Vol. 41,No.
1, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REPRESSION OF OXIDATIVE
PHOSPHORYLATION
IN ESCHERICHIA COLI B BY GROWTH IN GLUCOSE AND OTHER CARBOHYDRATES
Walter Department
P. Hempfling
of Biology,
River
University
Campus Station,
of Rochester,
Rochester,
N.Y.
14627
Received August 5, 1970 Sumnary A simplified method for the assay of oxidative phosphorylation in intact bacteria is described. Using this method it is shown that the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation in Escherichia coli B grown in glucose-containing media is less than 10% of that of organismsgrown in media containing noncarbohydrate substrates. Growth in media containing galactose, lactose or mannitol yields cells capable of only half the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation of fully competent cells. The incorporation of casamino acids into the growth medium has no effect on glucose repression of oxidative phosphorylation. Stimulation of respiration by the uncoupler 2,4-dibromophenol occurs only in organisms in which all three sites of oxidative phosphorylation are functional. Introduction Escherichia tionary
coli
period
B, grown
of growth,
is
in tryptic capable
soy broth
of oxidative
and harvested phosphorylation
in the stawith
an
. apparent
efficiency
Bacteria
harvested
efficiency
during
f 0.3 moles the
of phosphorylation,
cose.
Using
based
on that
cally
in a variety
which
are
suggest phorylation Materials
of 3.5
a method previously
part is
logarithmic
growth
however,
apparently
of oxidative
described
of media
a function that
of assay
carry
it
of the enzymatic
period
due to the
repression.
--and Methods
Escherichia
cqJ
B was maintained
as described'. 9
cells
growing
lower of glucells aerobi-
at efficiencies
medium.
apparatus
presence in intact
phosphorylation
of the growth
of NADH oxidized'.
show considerably
can be shown that
or structural
to catabolite
per mole
phosphorylation
out oxidative
of the composition
subject
Pi esterified
The results
of oxidative
phos-
VoL41,No.
BIOCHEMICAL
1, 1970
The media of growth
employed
in the
composition:
presence
- 10 ml/l;
5 g/l;
and substrate E. coli
times within removed after
when
the cold in cold buffer
grown
at 12,000
the effects
of the
NaCl - 0.3
- 30 mfi, pH 7.0;
Difco
to be used for
700 ml of medium
in tryptic were
the optical
Tris-Cl
into
When the effect
inoculation)
g/l;
at 300 rpm on a New Brunswick
the contents
10 min.
to test
a solution
NH4Cl - 0.5
in the medium
(5%, v/v)
cells
stated,
and,
COMMUNICATIONS
following
g/l;
trace
Casamino
Acids
- 15 mM_.
shaken
When examining
Soy Broth
substrates,
phosphate
B was cultivated
were
Tryptic
- 0.8 g/l;
potassium
inoculation
Cultures
Fisher
of various
MgS04'7H20
metals2
before
were
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
soy broth
chilled
of various
substrates
imnediately
x g for
Cells
buffer,
10 min.
0.1 1,
at a concentration
pH 7.5,
of about
in 2.8
1 Fernbach
flasks.
platform
shaker
were in ice,
were
washed
and were
15 mg/ml
finally
(dry
at the
and then
1.0 * 0.1
harvested
at 37'.
removed
was tested
at 650 nni reached
and the contents
of 12 hr
flasks
immediately
density
a period
harvested
flasks
(2.5
were
to 6 hr
by centrifuging
twice
by resuspending
suspended
weight)
in
in the same
and kept
in ice
until
used. The respiratory with
a Clark
piration
oxygen
3 fl
the anthrone
were
of bacterial
electrode
glucose
in 0.1 MTris-Cl Glucose
activity
in the
in a vessel
was added
buffer,
oxidative
to a washed
portion
incubated
at 30"
32
phosphorylation for
7 min under
, pH 7.0,
cell
suspension
of the culture
to each of 4 samples
added
5 ~1 of 0.1!2,4-dibromophenol The 4 samples
The P/2e'
value
(Set
To initiate (0.6
res-
- 0.8 mg/ml)
fluid
was assayed
a stream
1).
1 ml suspensions
of bacteria
of He'.
time
activity
(Set
expressed
3) received is
10
At zero 500-1000
To each of 4 other in methanol
remaining finally
twelve
0.5 I+, specific
added
7.0.
of 3.5 ml volume,
at 23-25'
pH 7.5
supernatant
To assay
Pi32.
was measured
by
procedure3.
of Tris-phosphate
Of
suspensions
samples
(DBP) 30 set
20 ~1
cpm/mumole, (Set before
2) was addition
20 ~1 of 0.5 MTris-Pi,
the amount
of pi32
esterified
was
pH after
-
Vol. 41, No. 1, 1970
5 set
of exposure
presence (Set
BIOCHEMICAL
of the uncoupler
3).
the
Pi32
injected
intra-
addition into
later
(Set (Set
under
two samples
of
of each set
the addition
of aerobic
in the cold
method
of Hagihara
for
pH 7.5,
Tris-Cl
buffer
5 set
ethanol'.
The remaining 5 - 10 set
were
of total
and organic
portion
phosphate
Mk II scintillation
An Ansitron
before
centrifuged
and 1 ml of the supernatant
the measurement
and Lardy'.
followed
samples
5 set
To each of two
reagent
The acid-treated material
was rapidly
of Set 2 followed
1 ml of the terminating
buffer.
of
at 15 min
1.8 fi HC104 and 1.2 5 Na2S044.
to remove denatured
of each was removed
0.15,
of 1.4 L KOH in 85% (v/v)
received
the
equilibration
Accordingly,
buffer,
1 ml of aerobic
in
of NADH oxidized
isotopic
spaces. Tris-Cl
incorporated
amount
of Set 1 and two samples
by 1 ml of a solution
samples
by the
He assured
1 ml of aerobic
of Set 3 was added
later
the amount
and extracellular
by 1 ml of a solution
samples
1) minus 2) divided
15 min of incubation
P 32 between alter
to oxygen
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
by the
counter
was
used. NADH was determined Set 3 as previously
in heated,
neutralized
portions
of the samples
in which
the time
of
1.
described
Results Table growth, coli
1 shows the results
glucose 6 growing
lation
within
out full
oxidative
prevents
both
yield
dependent
compounds phosphorylation
were
tested of cells
at the
at the time
for
11
in
the
glucose
phosphoryto
acquisition
of
by the
is exhausted,
phosphorylation. of glucose
r.
The
disappearance,
utilized.
the ability grown
of
the ability
is demonstrated
of oxidative
of glucose
oxidative
That
time
course
was followed.
of glucose
upon growth
added
of such a culture, per mole
of full
is gained.
and the development
60 - 70 g dry weight Other
incapable
phosphorylation is
efficiency
the exhaustion
chloramphenicol,
growth
is
90 min after
oxidative
that
growth
oxidative
soy broth
phosphorylation
observation
molar
and phosphorylation
in tryptic
although
carry
is
utilization
of an experiment
their
to affect presence,
the efficiency and the results
of
VoL41,No.
Table
BlOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCH
1,197O
Efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation growth in tryptic soy broth.
1.
Time
0
Cella density
hr
in r.
nPib
Residual glucose
coli
B during
ANADHb
Apparent P/2e'
0.07
14.2
2.0
0.62
9.2
0.47
1.43
0.33
3.5
1.92
0.6
0.30
0.82
0.36
5.2
2.48
0
3.69
1.13
3.3
5.8
2.70
0
3.48
0.81
3.9
6.3'
1.84
0.12
0.53
0.23
aOptical
density dry
'30
ug/ml
chloramphenicol
are
given
in Table
weight.
in media
oxidation previously
titious
Pi. carry
contains
Class
out
reported
that
are
of cells
capable grown
but only
during
the
to the class
the rate
of substrate
little
by DBP.
rate
15 min anaerobic employed
for
addition
glucose
grown
12
is
(Class
uptake
less
than
the medium also glucose
containing
intermediate A compounds
consumption of DBP.
C) do
during
in media
Class
preincubation growth
during
even when
containing
by the
found
phosphorylation
of oxygen
oxidative
(some 5 - 10%) by adven-
of oxygen
Cells
of oxidative
of full
value
of Pi32
rate
Organisms
consumption
phosphorylation,
and their
separable.
capable
of oxygen
of dilution
in media
their
are
were
The mean P/2e'
oxidative
A compound,
changed
esterified
of compounds
in a medium containing
not much increased
glucose, is
grown
hr.
A compounds
because
significant
B compounds
containing dation
Class
Organisms
is
between
classes
some 1.7 - fold.
a Class
oxidation
Three
2.
at 3.6
and DBP increases
that
not
added
containing
phosphorylation glucose
-
at 650 nm.
bvmoles/g
grown
mII
COMMUNICATIONS
during
and those glucose
The amounts period
in a manner
differ perhaps
oxi-
of Pi according related
to
BIOCHEMICALANDBIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
Vol.41,No.1,1970
Table
2.
Oxidative of various
Substrate
AP.a1
--Class
phosphorylation substrates.
A
in g. coli
NADHa
Apparent P/2e'
4.63 3.52 6.24 6.07 3.60 4.80 5.36 4.15 4.60
1.52 1.06 1.61 1.83 1.14 1.70 1.92 1.08 1.18
APi
presence
GlucoseC oxidation
4.05 7.05 6.24 9.14 8.83 8.21 8.73 7.14 10.63
Mean (12)e S.D.
3.3 0.4
RCRd
2
1.80 1.45
s:
1.47 1.81
:;
1.88 1.87
7.9 1.0
iI::
B
Lactose Mannitol Galactose
3.16 1.98 2.25
1.91 1.00 1.15
:?I 2:o
9.00 5.76 7.14
ii:
7.1 1.1
Mean (6) S.D. --Class
Anaerobicb
in the
A
None Formate Acetate Lactate Glycerol Succinate Malate Glutamate Ribose
--Class
B grown
COMMUNICATIONS
0.93 1.00 1.14
zi 52
A::
C
Glucose Glucose t glycerol Glucose + lactate
0.17 0.31
1.83 2.08
0.10 0.15
2.36 1.74
88 74
1.15 0.92
0.58
3.03
0.20
2.10
65
1.19
Mean (6) S.D.
apmoles/g
dry weight.
bPi esterified 'dj d
during
15 min anaerobic
preincubation
(pmoles/g
dry weight).
02/min/mg.
Respiratory the presence
eNumber
glucose oxidation of DBP.
rate
in
of samples.
the ability capable
ratio of steady state Control Ratio: of 140 IJM DBP to that in the absence
to carry of glucose
out oxidative oxidation
as well
phosphorylation. being
tested. 13
able
All to oxidize
preparations the compound
are
BIOCHEMICALAND
Vol.41,No.1,1970
Variation no effect
of the concentration
on the
although
it
is
ability
by the presence
of casamino
of glucose
possible
that
BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
to repress
repression
or absence
acids
of added
carbon
(zero
oxidative
by Class
COMMUNICATIONS
to 10 g/l)
had
phosphorylation,
B compounds
could
be affected
sources.
Discussion Growth to all
in glucose
three
is
growth
is
not
sites
membranes,
derepression
of new cytochromes
have not
but
totally
unable
fully
uniformly
throughout
or
B compounds it
if
site
in a mannitol-containing
medium,
they
not did
permit note
following
the
glucose-grown that
oxidative
that
the
aerobic
is
effect
anaerobic
and Johnson"
found
that
molar
growth
yield
I.
e,
the are repressed
of the absence
grown
of a has
aerobically.
oxidation
However,
on glucose
but
in respiration DBP, fi-Cl-CCP
by r.
coli
growth
predicted Hadjipetrou,
of Aerobacter
methods
efficiency,
Like
molar
aerobic
Their
m-Cl-CCP
conditions.
than
anaerobically
uncoupler-sensitive
uncoupler
lower
14
with
of phosphorylation
the aerobic
operated.
of the popu-
595 , and glucose
mitochondria
grown
glucose
was considerably
phosphorylation
have appeared
of less
to aerobic during
a fraction
of
mitochondria'.
capable
of the
present
of phosphorylation
that
of changes
consumption
E.
of yeast
in
repression
phosphorylation
in yeast
same organism
calculation
from
oxygen
Hernandez
the
an increased
a shift
stimulates
is
partial
whether
synthesis
Hempfling,
bring
Reports
evidence
Massive
of quinones
about
it
of new proteins,
component. (W.P.
but
and amounts
not clear
I)
of synthesis,
synthesis
involved
out oxidative
(Site
have provided
did
is
the synthesis
than
by the
one or two sites
--et al8
Pi esterification
kinds
the population.
to repress
Cavari,
is not
to carry
competent
phosphorylation
been shown
about
common
to chloramphenicol,
or some other
of the
phosphorylation,
remainder
single
changes Class
is
brought
of the two,
been excluded.
oxidative lation
is
of components
Derepression
by the response
and flavoproteins
although
the synthesis
phosphorylation.
as indicated
a combination
preparation)
to repress
of oxidative
dependent
known if
appears
if
8'. yield
it
of
was assumed 11 reported --et al
aerogenes
was
Vol.41,No.1,1970
that
BIOCHEMICAL
expected
from
Such inconsistencies repressive
the
operation
might
effects
reported
related
compounds.
affects
repression
of other
some effects
of glucose
that
be due to a general terminal
electron
of three
be resolved
on oxidative
The results
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
of oxidative
by an investigation
phosphorylation
here
To what
sites
extend
extent systems
repression as yet
in the ability
of the
properties
of oxidative undetermined,
on enzyme synthesis
deficiency
phosphorylation. possible
of the substrates
the repressive
is
COMMUNICATIONS
in growing
used. of glucose
and
phosphorylation but
it
is
possible
microorganisms
to conserve
energy
technical
assistance.
may
through
transport.
Acknowledgments Thanks work
are
was supported
due Diane by Grant
K. Beeman for No. 68-8217
expert from
the
National
Science
This Foundation.
References Hempfling, W.P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 205, 169 (1970). Vishniac, W. and M. Santer. Bacterial. Rev., 21, 195 (1957). Ashwell, G. in S.P. Colowick and N.O. Kaplan (ed), Meth. Enzymol., Vol. III, P. 84 (1957). Hagihara, B. and H.A. Lardy. J. Biol. Chem., 235, 889 (1960). 54: Ohnishi, R., K. Kawaguchi and B. Hagihara. J. Blol. Chem., 241, 1797 (1966). 6. Kovac, L., H. Bednarova and II. Greksak. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 153, 32 (1968). and C.W. Sharp. Arch. Biochem. 7. Jayaraman, J., C. Cotman H.R. Mahler 116, 224 (19661. Biophys., Cavari, B.r Y. Avi-Dar and Ii. Grossowicz. J. Bacterial., 96, 751 (1968). and N. Grossowicz. Biochem. J., 103; 601 (1967). :: Cavari, B.Z., Y. Avi-Dor Hernandez, E. and M.J. Johnson. J. Bacterial., 94, 99G (lm). E: Hadjipetrou, L., J. Gerrits, F.A.G. Teulings andT.H. Stouthamer. J. Gen. Microbial., 36, 139 (1964).
:: 3.
15