Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau

Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau

Agricultural Sciences in China August 2009 2009, 8(8): 994-999 Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau ZHENG Hon...

282KB Sizes 0 Downloads 24 Views

Agricultural Sciences in China

August 2009

2009, 8(8): 994-999

Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau ZHENG Hong-mei1, HU Tian-ming2, WANG Quan-zhen2, ZHANG Guo-yun3 and SONG Jiang-hu2 College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China 3 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Molecular Biology of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, P.R.China 1 2

Abstract This work analyzed the genetic diversity of Kobresia accessions at the molecular level, and further obtained the necessary information for breeding and germplasm evaluation. Genomic DNA of Kobresia was amplified with four E+3 and M+3 primer combinations with AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism). AFLP analysis produced 164 scorable bands, of which 154 (93.96%) were polymorphic. The mean Nei’s gene diversity index (H) was 0.2430, and the Shannon’s information index (I) was 0.4012, indicating the abundant genetic diversity of Kobresia. The 11 Kobresia accessions from Tibetan Plateau, China, can be classified into five groups after cluster analysis based on the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method arithmetic average) method. In general, there was abundant genetic diversity among Kobresia accessions resources, and the genetic coefficient was unrelated to their geographic latitude. Natural habitats influenced genetic differentiation of Kobresia. Key words: Kobresia, genetic diversity, AFLP

INTRODUCTION Kobresia Willd., a perennial grass, belongs to the sedge family and carex subfamily; most members of the sedge family are constructive species on the alpine meadow. Kobresia was enjoyed by cattle for its softness and rich quality, and is also an important plant for controlling soil erosion and maintaining ecology balance (Zhou et al. 1982). This study will promote ecological construction of alpine rangeland, improve natural grassland, and develop the grassland-animal husbandry industry. The method of AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) has been applied to study the biodiversity (Barrett et al. 1998; Bohn et al. 1999), map construction (Caicedo et al. 1999; Zhong et al. 2004), cultivar identification (Renganayaki et al. 2001; Lombard et al.

2000), locating, isolating genes (Julio et al. 2006; Dong et al. 2000), heterosis prediction (He et al. 2002), molecular marker assisted breeding (Lokko et al. 2005), and so on. Great progress has been made in the research of many plants, such as wild cocksfoot, lupin, leymus chinensis, tobacco, corn, and so on (Peng et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2002; Hai et al. 2002; Hao et al. 2003). Although some preliminary researches have also been done on Kobresia germplasm resources by RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) molecular markers (Li et al. 2006; Zhao et al. 2006), the study on Kobresia by AFLP has not been reported in literature. The main objective of the present study is to analyze Kobresia genetic diversity in different habitats by AFLP molecular marker and provide evidence for comprehensive evaluation of Kobresia germplasm.

This paper is translated from its Chinese version in Scientia Agricultura Sinica. Correspondence HU Tian-ming, Professor, E-mail: [email protected]

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60305-3

Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau

995

MATERIALS AND METHODS

separation production (Bassam et al. 1991).

Materials

Data statistic and analysis method

Eleven plant accessions representing seven different species were sampled from Tibet alpine on September 2006. Details on these genotypes including geographic origin and geographic information system (GIS) data, wherever possible, are provided in Table 1. Sampling vouchers were deposited at the herbarium of Northwest A&F University, China.

Data analysis By AFLP polymorphic bands statistical method, each allele was scored as present (1) or absent (0) for each loci. Each band was scored which is clear and repeated, and the size ranged from 100-500 bp in length. Analysis method The percentage of polymorphic loci, Nei’s gene diversity index (Nei 1973), Shannon’s information index (Lewontin 1972), and gene flow (Nm) were calculated using POPGENE1. 31 (Yeh et al. 1999). The numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system (NTSYS-pc 2.1) was constructed using unweighted pair group method arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrograms of AFLP, the Mantel (1967) test statistic (Z) infered correlation genetic coefficient based on the geography distance matrix using the Mxcomp procedure of NTSYS-pc (Nei and Li 1979). Principal coordinate analysis was carried out by EIGEN.

Methods Genomic DNA of each accession was extracted from a pool of 30 plants using the modified CTAB method (Chen and Ronald 1999). DNA concentration was measured using a UV spectrophotometer, and concentrations were adjusted to 50 ng —L-1 for PCR analysis. AFLP optimized procedure refers to Vos’s method and other previous research (Vos et al. 1995; Yan et al. 2004). PAG electrophoresis and silver staining detect electrophoretic

Table 1 The environmental data for the different accessions of Kobresia Species

Code

Origion

K. royleana (N.) B. K. macrentha Boeck. K. littledalei C. B. Clarke K. royleana (N.) B K. prattii C. B. Clarke K. caillifolia Decne K. littledalei C. B. Clarke K. littledalei C. B. Clarke K. humilis C. A. Mey K. humilis C. A. Mey K. pygmaea C. B.

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11

Langkazi Langkazi Langkazi Naqu Dangxiong Dangxiong Naqu Dangxiong Naqu Dangxiong Naqu

Altitude (m) 4 455 4 455 4 455 4 456 4 278 4 278 4 456 4 278 4 456 4 278 4 456

Latitude and longitude 28°59´11N 28°59´11N 28°59´11N 31°26´34N 30°29´35N 30°29´35N 31°26´34N 30°29´35N 31°26´34N 30°29´35N 31°26´34N

90°26´04E 90°26´04E 90°26´04E 92°16´32E 91°05´58E 91°05´58E 92°16´32E 91°05´58E 92°16´32E 91°05´58E 92°16´32E

Habitat Alpine steppe Alpine meadow Alpine meadow Alpine steppe Alpine steppe Alpine meadow Marshy meadow Marshy meadow Alpine steppe Alpine steppe Alpine meadow

RESULTS Genetic diversity of Kobresia Different primers were screened and all were found to be polymorphic. The band numbers and the fragment length were different in each primer. Four primers were identified out of the 20 primers (Fig.1). AFLP markers, which amplified 154 polymorphic bands, showed high levels of polymorphism by the PIC value ranging from 87.80% (primer pair E-ACC + M-CAA) to

Fig. 1 AFLP fingerprint of 11 Kobresia accessions.

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

996

ZHENG Hong-mei et al.

96.97% (primer pair E-ACA + M - CTG) with an average of 93.96% across the germplasm assayed (Table 2). The mean Nei’s gene diversity index (H) of all accessions was 0.2430, the Shannon’s information index (I) was 0.4012, indicating that the genetic diversity of Kobresia is very rich. E-ACC+M-CAG, E- ACA+MCAG, E-ACA+M-CTG, E-ACC+M-CAA detected effective number of alleles (Ne) ranged from 1.2393 to 1.2838; gene diversity ranged from 0.1586 to 0.1894 (Table 3). The above indicators suggested that the genetic germplasm of Kobresia showed great variability within species, high polymorphic, and abundant genetic diversity.

Analysis of Kobresia germplasm genetic distance and cluster analysis

Table 2 The AFLP amplified result of Kobresia accessions

Table 3 Estimates of genetic diversity among Kobresia (mean ± SD)

Primers

Total loci

E-ACC+M-CAG EACA+M-CAG E-ACA+M-CTG E-ACC+M-CAA Total Average

47 43 33 41 164 41

Proportion of polymorphic loci

Polymorphic loci 45 41 32 36 154 38.5

95.74 95.34 96.97 87.8

A matrix of the Jaccard’s coefficients of similarity based on the data of AFLP markers was calculated between accessions as shown in Table 3. Similarity coefficient of pairwise comparisons among different accessions yielded values ranging from 0.1159 to 0.4390, its mean value for all possible pairwise comparisons was 0.2774. Maximal genetic distance came from accession C1 and accession C10, minimum genetic distance came from accession C3 and accession C4, genetic identity among accession of Kobresia reached 0.56098 to 0.88415 (Table 4).

Primer combinations

Effective number of alleles

Nei’s gene diversity

Shannon’s information index

E-ACC+M-CAG E-ACA+M-CAG E-ACA+M-CTG E-ACC+M-CAA

1.2838 ± 0.2883 1.2781 ± 0.2770 1.2393 ± 0.2735 1.2439 ± 0.3028

0.1894 ± 0.1456 0.1871 ± 0.1457 0.1602 ± 0.1553 0.1586 ± 0.1595

0.3176 ± 0.1892 0.3122 ± 0.1958 0.2614 ± 0.2274 0.2622 ± 0.2222

93.96

Table 4 Coefficient in the accessions of Kobresia ID C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

1.0000 0.2379 0.2379 0.2317 0.2744 0.3110 0.2805 0.2805 0.2866 0.3720 0.3598

0.7621 1.0000 0.2439 0.2988 0.3171 0.3293 0.3232 0.3232 0.2927 0.4146 0.4390

0.7621 0.7561 1.0000 0.1890 0.2317 0.2073 0.3232 0.2988 0.2927 0.3415 0.3780

0.7683 0.7012 0.8110 1.0000 0.1402 0.2378 0.2561 0.2195 0.2134 0.3232 0.3475

0.7256 0.6829 0.7683 0.8598 1.0000 0.3049 0.2256 0.2378 0.2073 0.3049 0.3536

0.6890 0.6707 0.7927 0.7622 0.6951 1.0000 0.3598 0.3720 0.3659 0.4024 0.4268

0.7195 0.6768 0.6768 0.7439 0.7744 0.6402 1.0000 0.1829 0.2134 0.2988 0.4085

0.7195 0.6768 0.7012 0.7805 0.7622 0.6280 0.8171 1.0000 0.1159 0.2866 0.3963

0.7134 0.7073 0.7073 0.7866 0.7927 0.6341 0.7866 0.8841 1.0000 0.2805 0.3415

0.6280 0.5854 0.6585 0.6768 0.6951 0.5976 0.7012 0.7134 0.7195 1.0000 0.3902

0.6402 0.5610 0.6220 0.6524 0.6463 0.5732 0.5915 0.6037 0.6585 0.6098 1.0000

Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal); genetic distance (below diagonal).

The eleven accessions can be classified into five major genetic groups when genetic similarity is 0.74 (Fig.2). Accessions C6, C9, C10, and C11 cluster together, accessions C7 and C8 are in one group, accessions C3, C4, and C5 had a closer relationship, and accessions C1 and C2 do not group with any others.

Genetic structure of Kobrsia Supposing genetic equilibrium by means of POPGENE32 software, genetic diversity within Kobresia accessions

Fig. 2 The dendrogram generated by AFLP data using UPGMA method among 11 Kobresia accesions.

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau

997

is 0.223, the total index of genetic diversity is 0.2430; genetic differentiation level was calculated according to the total index of genetic diversity and genetic diversity within accessions (Fig. 3). The gene differentiation coefficient values (0.0932) showed that most of the genetic variability resided among individuals within accessions, whereas only 9.32% resided among accessions. The number of migrants per generation indicates genetic variance among and within populations. Mean gene flow is 4.8639, which correlates to high genetic variance among Kobresia populations of the species.

Fig. 4 Relationship between coefficient and elevation interval among accessions of Kobresia.

Fig. 3 A two-dimensinal PCO plot of 11 Kobresia accessions.

Effects of altitude on genetic similarity within accessions The relationship between genetic similarity coefficient and altitude within Kobresia accessions was analyzed using Matel test (Mantel 1967), the result is r = 0.75363, P = 1.0000 > 0.05, which suggests that there is no correlation between them (Fig.4).

DISCUSSION The high efficiency of genetic diversity for Kobresia by AFLP The results show that AFLP was stabile and repeatable which could completely reveal the hereditary feature of germplasm resources especially with close genetic relationship. For the first time, AFLP was adopted in the research of molecular markers on Kobresia

accessions. Four primer pairs were used, and produced 164 polymorphic loci, with an average of 38.5 polymorphic bands per primer pair by AFLP. Each primer amplified an average of 9.9 and 12 DNA polymorphic bands by RAPD, according to results of predecessors’ research. It can be concluded that the detection efficiency of polymorphic bands per primer is higher by AFLP than by RAPD (Zhao et al. 2006; Barrett et al. 1998). AFLP clearly detected DNA special polymorphic fragment and reflected genetic difference, deification, and classifications within Kobresia accessions. The results of the ratio between polymorphic loci, genetic similarity, and cluster analysis suggest the relatively abundant genetic diversity within Kobresia accessions by AFLP.

Genetic structure analysis The materials were grown in different habitats in this experiment, and were separately collected from discontinuous distribution places Langkazi, Naqu, Dangxiong, China, thereby creating genetic differentiation among accessions. Kobresia’s main mode of reproduction is rhizome asexual propagation, assisted by the wind-pollinated character. The special life history characteristics of Kobresia cause gene flow among accessions. The

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

998

ZHENG Hong-mei et al.

migrant number of per generation 4.8639 (Nm) suggests that genetic drift does not lead to Kobresia’s genetic diversity. Hong et al. (2001) suggest that heritable variation of asexual plants is not less than that of the sexual reproductive; environmental heterogeneity may play an important role in clone plant genetic variation. It concludes that genetic variation of Kobresia accessions depends on different habits, which is a result of adaptation to ecological surroundings over a long period of time.

Genetic similarity and cluster analysis The relationship between genetic variation and geographical environment is an issue of universal concern. 11 Kobresia accessions were clustered into 4 groups based on the genetic similarity data using hierarchical cluster analysis. The result showed that C6, C9, C10, and C11 clustered together with close relationship; C7, C8, C3, C4, and C5 clustered together; C1 and C2 separately clustered. As for the geographic distribution, C1, C2, and C3 were collected from Langkazi; C6, C5, C8, and C10 were collected from Dangxiong; and C4, C7, C9, and C11 from Naqu. It is concluded from cluster analysis that the genetic coefficient is unrelated to their geographic latitude. Most same Kobresia species accessions are clustered together, but some accessions also are special, thus suggesting that many factors affect Kobresia genetic differentiation (Fig.2).

Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Key International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2006DFA33630), and the Key Science and Technology Research Program of Tibet, China (2005011) .

References Barrett B A, Kidwell K K, Fox P N. 1998. AFLP-based genetics diversity assessment among wheat cultivars from the pacific northwest. Crop Science, 38, 1261-1271. Bassam B J, Caetano-Anollés G, Greshoff P M. 19991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 196, 80-83. Bohn M, Utz H F, Melchinger A E. 1999. Genetics similarities

among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Science, 39, 228- 237. Caicedo A L, Gaitán E, Duque M C, Toro Chica O, Debouck D G, Tohme J. 1999. AFLP fingerprinting of Phaseolus lunatus L. and related wild species from South America. Crop Science, 39, 1497-1507. Chen D H, Ronald P C. 1999. A rapid DNA minipreparation method suitable for AFLP and other PCR applications. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 17, 53-57. Dong N V, Subudhi P K, Luong P N, Quang V D, Quy T D, Zheng H G, Wang B, Nguyen H T. 2000. Molecular mapping of a rice gene conditioning thermosensitive genic male sterility using AFLP, RFLP and SSR techniques. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100, 727-734. Hai L, Xiao S H, Yan C S, Zhang X Y. 2002. Analysis of genetic difference between species in Lupins by AFLP. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 35, 911-915. (in Chinese) Hao C Y, Wang L F, Dong Y S, Shang X W, Zhang X Y. 2003. Genetic diversity of wheat varieties released in northwest spring wheat region revealed by AFLP. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 4, 285-291. (in Chinese) He G H, Hou L, Li D M, Luo X Y, Niu G Q, Tang M, Pei Y. 2002. Predication of yield components in hybrid rice by using molecular markers. Acta Genetic Sinica, 29, 438-444. (in Chinese) Hong R M, Wang Y S, Yang J H. 2001. Analysis of phenotypic and genetic variation in colonial population of Leymus chinensis and others. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 32, 313-319. Julio E, Verrier J L, Dorlhac de Borne F. 2006. Development of SCAR markers linked to three disease resistances based on AFLP within Nicotiana tabacum L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112, 335-346. Lewintin R C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology, 6, 391-398 Li Q X, Zhao Q F, Cui Y, Ma S R. 2006. Genetic diversity of Kobresia setchwanensis along the east-southern of QinghaiTibet plateau. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 42, 69-73. (in Chinese) Liu J, Zhu Z Q, Liu G S, Qi D M, Li F F. 2002. AFLP variation analysis on the germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis. Acta Botanica Sinica, 44, 845-851. Lokko Y, Danquah E Y, Offei S K, Dixon A G O, Gedil M A. 2005. Molecular markers associated with a new source of resistance to the cassava mosaic disease. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 873-881. Lombard V, Baril C P, Dubreuil P, Blouet F, Zhang D. 2000. Genetic relationships and fingerprinting of rapeseed cultivars by AFLP: Consequences for varietal registration. Crop

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Research of Genetic Diversity in Seven Kobresia by AFLP in Tibetan Plateau

999

Science, 40, 1417-1425. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a

analysis of Pigeon pea germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 5, 342-345. (in Chinese)

generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209220.

Yang Y C, Zhou Q M, Yin H Q, Zhu L S. 2006. Studies on genetic diversity and relationship in tobacco germplasms by AFLP

Nei M, Li W H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings

analysis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 39, 2194-2199. (in Chinese)

of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 76, 52695273.

Yeh F C, Yang R C. 1999. A joint project. POPGENE VERSION 1.31. University of Alberta And Tim Boyle, Centre for

Peng Y, Zhang X Q, Liu J P, Yi Y J. 2006. AFLP analysis on genetic diversity of wild Dactylis glomerata L. germplasm

International Forestry Research August. [2006-07-20]. ftp:// ftp. microsoft.com/Softlib/MSLFILES/HPGL.EXE

resources. Hereditas, 28, 845-850. (in Chinese) Renganayaki K, Read J C, Fritz A K. 2001. Genetic diversity

Zhao Q F, Li Q X, Ma S R, Cui Y, Wang G. 2006. RAPD analysis of genetic diversity of Kobresia humilis along the

among Texas bluegrass genotypes (Poa arachnifera Torr.) revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers. Theoretical and

eastern of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 26, 2494-2501. (in Chinese)

Applied Genetics, 102, 1037-1045. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for

Zhong D, Pai A, Yan G. 2004. AFLP-based genetic linkage map for the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Journal of

DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research, 23, 4407- 4414. Yan L, Guan J P, Zong X X. 2004. Optimization of AFLP

Heredity, 9, 53-61. Zhou X M. 1982. Kobresia Meadow of China. Science Press,

fingerprinting and screening of primer pairs in genetic diversity

Beijing. (in Chinese) (Edited by ZHANG Yi-min)

© 2009, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.