Restriction of Lactase Gene Expression Along the Proximal-toDistal Axis of Rat Small Intestine Occurs During Postnatal Development EDMOND H. H. M. RINGS,* ANTOON F. M. MOORMAN,§ and HANS A. BuLLER*
STEPHEN D. KRASINSKI,P ERIK H. VAN BEERS,* JAN DEKKER,* ROBERT K. MONTGOMERY,? RICHARD
J. GRAND,’
*Center for Liver and Intestinal Research, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, and §Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and ‘Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Back@wund/Aims: Developmental changes of lactase activity along the proximal-to-distal axis of the small intestine are poorly understood. A study to delineate lactase gene expression at the cellular level was undertaken. Methods: The topographical regulation of lactase was studied in conjunction with sucrase-isomaltase in proximal, middle, and distal segments of O-, 7-, 14-, 16, 16, 21-, and 28dayold and adult rats using in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and ribonuclease protection assays. Results: From 0 to 16 days, lactase messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein were abundant along the total length of the small intestine. However, at weaning, lactase mRNA and protein were no longer detectable in the terminal ileum. After 28 days, zones of reduced lactase expression were found in the duodenum and terminal ileum. These zones demonstrated expression of lactase protein in scattered enterocytes along the villus (patchy expression). In contrast, sucrase-isomaltase was first detected at 16 days, with patchy expression along the total small intestine; at 21 days it was abundant. Conclusions: Concordant changes in both lactase mRNA and protein detection during development suggest that the horizontal gradient of lactase enzyme expression is dependent on lactase mRNA abundance. Furthermore, zones of patchy lactase expression appear around weaning and flank the area of high lactase expression in the midintestine. Patchy expression is also found for sucraseisomaltase before weaning.
declines
around
gradient
in the small
is found
in the jejunum,
S
In adult
humans,
intestine.3
High
whereas
ileum show low or no lactase activity.
whether
or
shown that the total amount
enzyme
activity
the duodenum
and
Studies in rats have
of lactase enzyme activity
in
contrast to total protein content remains constant during postnatal development at the level found before weaning.* Although cific activity activity
the postweaning
and the regional
decrease in lactase-spe-
distribution
along the proximal-to-distal
of the specific
(horizontal)
axis of
the small intestine are well established, the mechanisms responsible for these phenomena at the molecular level are poorly Studies
understood. have
shown
that
lactase
messenger
RNA
(mRNA) levels in humans, as well as in rats, change coordinately with the amount of enzyme activity, suggesting transcriptional control of lactase expression.*-” In contrast, several studies have shown a discrepancy between lactase enzyme and mRNA levels during development in mammals, suggesting posttranscriptional trol mechanisms.73s Other studies suggest different
conphe-
notypes for the expression of lactase in the human population, which are controlled at either the transcriptional or posttranslational level.9-11 Maiuri et al.‘* have shown the presence of a patchy pattern of expression in lactase-deficient
mall intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.23-62; subsequently referred to as lactase) plays an important role in the nutrition of newborn mammals. The enzyme hydrolyzes both lactose and phlorizin through two independent catalytic sites’ and also functions in the digestion of glycolipids in adulthood.* During development in most mammals, lactase enzymespecific activity is high around the time of birth and
weaning.
not they have elevated or low lactase levels, the enzyme activity is found in a characteristic proximal-to-distal
could be declines. renzsonn has been
adult
humans
and suggested
that
this
the mechanism by which lactase-specific activity This observation was recently confirmed by Loet a1.i3 Patchy lactase protein expression also described in rabbits and adult rats.‘*
Abbreviations used in this papec PAP, peroxidase-antiperoxidase; RNase, ribonuclease. 0 1994 by the American Gastroenterological Association OOIB-5085/94/$3.00
1224 RINGS
Around
GASTROENTEROLOGY
ET AL.
weaning,
of microvillus
a transition
membrane
that sucrase-isomaltase tivity
decreases
throughout sition
hydrolases.
activity
and
further
enables
occurs in the expression increases when lactase ac-
remains
constant
development.15
the young
rodent
solid food. The expression
It is well known at high
levels
This enzymatic to switch
tran-
from milk to
of both lactasei62’7 and sucrase-
isomaltase’8~‘9 have been described
along the cryptMItts
(vertical) axis in the small intestine. Lactase is expressed at high levels before birth. In the prenatal period, both lactase mRNA length
and protein
of the villus.”
expression
are present
A restriction
along
of 16-, 18-, 21-, and 28day-old
intestine
for the postweaning lactase protein. midpoint and eighths
region,
without
along the total length redistribution
of the villus.”
of lactase mRNA
of differentiation sentation
detectable
intestine
saline
(PBS), pH
of the enterocytes.
of lactase mRNA
base to
was detectable
This topographic
indicated
a new aspect
This postnatal
expression
7.4. Tissue
formaldehyde (40:40:20,
PBS
and
[a-3rS)deoxycytidine and [a-32P)uridine
from Du Pont-New
bosch,
the Netherlands,
was from Ilford, purchased
pre-
England.
from Sigma Chemical
Specifications Lactase
mRNA
weaning
cDNA,
investigated. specific
lactase
in conjunction
maltase.
This
localization ization,
gene
with
study along
tine during
the postnatal
and the regional
we have studied level
development
To correlate
activity
expression
postnatal
lactase
development
mRNA using
and protein
and ribonuclease
(RNase)
performed
ME) DNA
Breeding
Labo-
LMP Agaprobes
according
were to the
method.20
in situ hybridization
in rat small intestines, using
previously
we
published
The in situ hybridization procedures for lactase and sucrase-isomaltase were performed on closely adjacent sec-
reaction
Zeist, the Netherlands, Center animal facilities
of Pennsylvania,
protocols.“~*’
conditions from TN0
using a par-
(NuSieve
of the hybridization
of sections from rats of each age were processed
Animals ratories, Medical
labeling
l-
partial
rat sucrase-isomaltase
at 15°C with [a-35S]dCTP,
tions to allow comparison
Materials and Methods rats were purchased
Rockland,
To localize lactase mRNA
intes-
in situ hybrid-
rat lactase
was detected
an 827-bp
&RI-
lactase
Localization of Lactase and Sucraselsomaltase mRNA by In Situ Hybridization
of sucrase-iso-
assays.
Wistar
multiprime
at the molecular
axis of the small
immunohistochemistry,
protection
decline
of lactase
a 1.8-kb
(cDNA)
a 2.3-kb
PA). The agarose-purified
labeled overnight
of this activity,
using
a gift of Dr. P. G. Traber, University
Philadelphia,
G5
Probes
DNA
mRNA
(pRSI-1,”
rose; FMC BioProducts,
the expression
describes
along
Sucrase-isomaltase
tial rat cDNA
also has not been
gradient
the horizontal
level.
and protein
from
emulsion
(type XIV) was
Co. (St. Louis, MO).
was derected
derived
were pur-
‘s-Hertogen-
research Pronase
of Molecular
cDNA.”
axis during
water
(1350 Ci/mmol)
Nuclear,
and nuclear
London,
The exact distribution and pattern of expression of both hydrolases along the horizontal axis around the time of
the horizontal
and
(800 Ci/mmol)
England
clone,
at the cellular
acetone,
5’-triphosphate
5’-triphosphate
chased
along the vertical
mRNA
and
in 4% para-
Chemicals
Bluescript
of lactase
phosphate-buffered
methanol,
of the complementary
has not been studied
in the lumen of the
with
respectively).
PstI insert
localization
and
for in situ hybridization
axis is comparable to that of sucrase-isomaltase mRNA expression in adult human and rat small intestines.““”
The
of the proximal
was fixed by immersion
in
of the
and distal quarters
Fecal content gently
pattern
segments,
of proximal
was flushed
immunohistochemistry
mRNA
lactase mRNA
tip, whereas lactase protein
the midpoints
were examined.
small
and distal
the total
in lactase
was found only from the villus
the midvillus at the villus
of the intestine,
No. 5
rats were analyzed
and expression
The most proximal
distal halves, and the midpoints
was observed along the vertical axis after birth.
Lactase mRNA
distribution
Vol. 106,
using
aliquots
to allow comparison
ages. Hybridization
of probe
from
of mRNA
was carried
patterns.
Series
under identical
the same labeling
expression
out overnight
at different
at 44°C. The
and housed at the Academic at constant temperature and
probe concentration was approximately 0.5 ng/pL and contained 5 X 10’ cpm/pL. Slides were dipped into liquid emul-
humidity on a la-hour light-dark cycle. The rats had free access to standard chow and water. Intestinal tissue samples
sion (Ilford G5 emulsion), and autoradiography was performed after slides were stored at 4°C for 5 days. The emulsion was
were obtained
from rats 0, 7, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 28 days after
birth and from adult rats. Sections
from two animals
of each
age were studied.
Tissue Processing Total small intestines
were dissected
rapidly. Intestinal
sections were from most proximal, middle, and most distal segments of small intestine from rats 0, 7, 14, 2 1, and 28 days after birth
and from adult
rats. Nine
segments
of the small
developed at 18%.
by dipping
the slides for 4 minutes
Tissue was counterstained
into developer
and dehydrated.
were mounted in Malinol (Chroma, Stuttgart, photographed using Agfa Pan APX 25 (15 DIN) Leverkusen, Germany). Control experiments for in situ hybridization trol hybridizations with pBR322 vector DNA,
Sections
Germany) and film (Gevaert, included conwhich was la-
beled as described above. To confirm the specificity, hybridization was also performed under more stringent
in situ condi-
RESTRICTION
May 1994
tions (higher hybridization Data are presented better
preserved
and washing
temperature
for the lower stringency tissue morphology
at 5O’C).
conditions,
as previously
which
Antibodies antibody
immunohistochemistry
against
rat lactase** used for
has been described
previously.”
The
was used in the form of ascites from pristane-primed
BALB/c mice and diluted antibody
against
chemistry
in PBS. The monospecific
rat sucrase-isomaltase
has been described
polyclonal
antibody
State University,
previously.23
Shreveport,
all biosynthetic
Results
indirect
was used in
in PBS. This antibody
(PAP) technique.” fin sections. ranging
lactase antibody
the other
the sucrase-isomaltase incubations
dilutions.
antibody
without
dilution
comparable
dilution
for
guanidinium ugation
segment
lactase protein
1C).
This pattern
mRNA
isothiocyanate
through
al.** RNA was quantified A 2607 its purity integrity
as described
by optical density
was determined
bromide
somal RNA bands in nondenaturing tection
for antisense
assays were either
cially. A template from
characterized subcloned
1.8-kb
derived
rat lactase cDNA.*
Biotechnologies,
earized with E&I
scribed with T7 RNA polymerase, A mouse p-actin as a template The template
cDNA
The template
yielding
fragment (Ambion,
yielding
260 bases. The protected
200 bases. Antisense
from a previously was
was tran-
an antisense
probe
was 117 bases. Inc., Austin,
TX) served
for an antisense probe of rat p-actin mRNA. was linearized with PstI and transcribed with
SP6 RNA polymerase, mately
commer-
Inc., New Haven, CT) and lin-
before transcription.
of 186 bases; the protected
of ribo-
fragment
RNA
an antisense fragment
probes were synthesized
in 0- and
sucrase-isomaltase
tive protein
2 shows lactase mRNA expression
weaning
and immunoreac-
along the proximal-to-distal
in 14- and 28-day-old
axis
rats. At 14 days,
the proximal, middle, and distal small intestine (Figure 2A, B, and C, respectively). Similarly, at this age lactase protein is present in the same three segments (Figure
was constructed
This
intestine
of
at
BamHI site of pIBI31
into the dephosphorylated
(International
or obtained
lactase mRNA
of the small expression
was found
lactase mRNA
1.2% agarose gels.
constructed
for mature
from
Profile of Lactase Expression Around Weaning
around
and its
staining
is clearly detectable
to the tip of the villus (Figure
et
RNA probes for use in RNase pro-
BamHI fragment
a 117-bp
measurements
by A2&A2a0 ratios,
was assessed by ethidium
Templates
by Chirgwin
No
1A). from
was found at these time points (data not shown).
Figure in
buffer and purified by ultracentrif-
cesium chloride
rats.
por-
region (Figure
of lactase gene expression
the total length
7-day-old
included
was homogenized
to the midvillus
junction
antibody.
of intestine
junction
rat (Figure
can only be detected
1B). In contrast,
RNase Protection Assays A l-2-cm
as shown in the middle
the crypt-villus along
for the
results were
The optimal
was 1:2000. Controls
the primary
paraf-
in serial dilutions,
The optimal
was 1:2000, although
with
the crypt-villus
is lined by a monolayer
of a 7-day-old
At this age, lactase mRNA
peroxidase-antiperoxidase on 7-pm-thick
epithelium,
tion of the small intestine
by immunohistochemistry
were performed
1:50 to 1:3200.
In rats the small intestine
recognizes
of differentiated
Lactase was visualized
All incubations
from
obtained
was detected unconjugated
Profile of Lactase Expression in Suckling Rats
Yeh, Louisiana
forms of the protein.*s
Lactase protein the
X lo* cpm) was added to 5 /,tg of sample
polyclonal
lmmunodetection of Lactase in Rat Small Intestines using
to a proantisense
The synthesized antisense actin probe (-5.0 X lo* cpm) was added to 0.5 pg of sample RNA. Yeast tRNA was analyzed in each experiment to correct for background.
(Sucrase-isomaltase
LA.) The antibody
the form of serum and diluted
according
et a1.25 The synthesized
RNA.
used for immunohisto-
was a gift of Dr. K.-Y.
1225
5.0 X lo4 cpm/fmol;
assays were performed
by Sambrook
lactase probe (-5.0
The monoclonal
EXPRESSION
that of the actin probe was 4.0 X lo3 cpm/fmol. RNase protection
described.”
GENE
of the lactase probe was approximately
tocol described
antibody
OF RAT LACTASE
probe of approxiwas approximately using a commer-
cially available kit (Riboprobe Gemini II; Promega Biotec, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Probes were labeled using [c&~~P)IJTP. The specific activity
is present
20, E, and F, respectively).
and is expressed abundantly
In contrast,
in
Figure 2G shows
that in the proximal part of the small intestine of the 28-day-old rat, lactase mRNA is limited to the lower part of the villus. In the middle part of the small intestine, lactase mRNA is still abundant and located from the base of the villus to the midvillus region (Figure 2H), whereas no lactase mRNA is found in the distal small intestine (Figure 21). Figure 2J shows that lactase protein can no longer be detected intestine at 28 days. In contrast,
in the proximal small in the middle part of
the small intestine and similar to lactase mRNA in this segment, lactase protein is abundant (Figure 2K). Consistent with the absence of mRNA in the distal small intestine at 28 days, Figure 2L shows no detectable lactase protein. Figure 3 shows an autoradiogram of RNase protection assays for lactase mRNA expression along the proximalto-distal axis before and after weaning (14- and 2%dayold rats) in segments comparable to those in Figure 2.
1226
RINGS
GASTROENTEROLOGY
ET AL.
Vol. 106,
No. 5
Figure 1. Profile of lactase gene expression in 7-day-old rats. (A) Standard hematoxylin and azophloxine staining of intestinal sections; villi are lined by a single layer of enterocytes. (6) Expression of lactase mRNA in an area from the villus base to approximately half of the height of the villi. (C) Expression of lactase protein; immunohistochemical staining from the villus base to the tip (bar = 100 pm).
In Figure
2A, lanes 2, 3, and 4 show comparable
of lactase mRNA and distal
at 14 days in the proximal,
small intestine,
7 show lactase mRNA in Figure
respectively. decrease
intestine.
2A). As shown
in lactase
mRNA
The middle segment
is still
expresses abundant lactase mRNA, and no expression is found in the distal segment, as shown by in situ hybridization
(Figure
21). Actin
mRNA
shows little
from 14 to 28 days along the intestine
(Figure
change 2B).
Patchy Expression of Lactase and Sucrase-lsomaltase Protein in the Intestinal Epithelium sucrase-isomaltase weaning small
protein
expression
around
using
immunohistochemistry.
SA). The middle lactase expression
cytes along the vertical lactase protein segment
At
16
days, lactase protein is present in all enterocytes along the villus, as shown in Figure 4A. Patchy lactase protein
of this
segment
5B). Individual
axis of the intestine
The distal
shows entero-
express the
part of this 0.5-cm-long
shows that the lactase protein
is detectable
on
all apical membranes of enterocytes along the villi (Figure 5C). Patchy expression also was found in control experiments with different
concentrations
tern was confirmed
by staining
was uniformly
the time of
part (Figure
of the protein
on their apical surface, while others show
no lactase protein.
of patchy
at 16,2 1, and 28 days after birth in the proximal intestine,
patchy
does not show any expression
in consecutive
4 shows a detailed analysis of lactase and
Figure
this segment (Figure
middle,
Lanes 5, 6, and
at 28 days (Figure
2G, a marked
found in the proximal
levels
sections.
of antibody.
In contrast,
sucrase-isomaltase
stained in these segments
expression
The pat-
of the same enterocytes with no evidence
(data not shown).
Patterns of expression were compared for lactase and sucrase-isomaltase in adjacent sections of small intestine. In 14-day-old Figure
rats, lactase expression
2, and no sucrase-isomaltase
was as described could
in
be detected.
In 21-day-old rats, both lactase and sucrase-isomaltase mRNA were detectable in the proximal segment of the small intestine (data not shown). Both lactase and su-
expression is observed at 2 1 days (Figure 4B). Immunoreactivity is found in scattered enterocytes, but adjacent cells show no lactase protein staining. Lactase protein is
erase-isomaltase mRNA could be found in the middle part of the intestine, with a comparable pattern of expres-
no longer detectable 28 days after birth (Figure 4C). In directly adjacent sections, analysis was performed
was present
to elucidate
sucrase-isomaltase
expression.
At 16 days,
sucrase-isomaltase is characterized by patchy expression, as shown in Figure 40. At 21 days, patchiness is no longer observed in the proximal segment (Figure 4E); sucrase-isomaltase is present in all enterocytes on the villus. This pattern is maintained during subsequent development, as shown in Figure 4F at 28 days. Interestingly, in the 21-day-old rat a striking pattern of expression of lactase protein is seen. A relatively short transition zone exists in the proximal intestine, as shown in Figure 5. In a short segment of the duodenum (length, 0.5 cm), three different patterns of expression of lactase protein can be recognized. The most proximai part of
sion along the vertical axis of the small intestine; from the crypt-villus
junction
mRNA
to the midvil-
lus. Neither mRNAs were present in crypt epithelial cells. In the distal part, however, restriction of lactase expression and disappearance of the lactase mRNA signal are observed (Figure 6A). In contrast, sucrase-isomaltase mRNA remains present in the distal ileum (Figure 6B). Consequently, lactase protein is no longer detectable (Figure 6C), and sucrase-isomaltase protein is clearly detectable in an adjacent section of the same region (Figure 6D). Table 1 summarizes the immunoreactivity data obtained using monoclonal antilactase and anti-sucraseisomaltase antibodies in different segments of the small intestine around weaning. Figure 7 integrates the data
May 1994
RESTRICTION OF RAT LACTASE GENE EXPRESSION
1227
Figure 2. Lactase mRNA and immunoreactive protein expression along the proximal-ttiistal axis around weaning in 14 and 28dayold rats. (A, B and C) Lactase mRNA expression along the horizontal axis of the small intestine at 14 days. Lactase mRNA is present and expressed at high levels in the proximal (A), middle (B), and distal(C) small intestine. (D, E, F) Expression of lactase protein at 14 days. Lactase protein is present in the proximal (D), middle (E), and distal (F) small intestine. (G, H and I) Lactase mRNA expression along the ho rizontal axis of the small intestine at 28 days. In the proximal part of the small intestine, lactase mRNA can be detected only at the base of the villus (G). In the middle part of the small intestine, lactase mRNA is clearly detectable (H). No lactase mRNA is detectable in the distal small intestine (I). (J, K and L) Expression of lactase protein at 28 days. Lactase pro tein is hardly detectable along the crypt-villus axis in the proximal small intestine(J). Lactase protein is abundant in the middle part of the small intestine (K). Lactase protein is not de tectable in the distal small intestine (L) (bar = 100 urn).
shown in Figures
2-6
and Table
1 to take into account
is found
over the time course
indicated
in the terminal
the growth
of the small intestine
studied.
16 days, lactase protein is found along the
in the midintestine
of the small intestine,
both proximally
total
At
length
as indicated
dark shaded area. At 18 days a restriction in the terminal sion, as indicated
ileum,
characterized
by the light
by the
is observed
by patchy
expres-
shaded area. No protein
by white
ileum
at 21 and 28 days, as
areas. The zone of high expression is flanked
and distally,
by zones of patchiness
from the time of weaning
onward. However,
sucrase-isomaltase
protein
cannot
be de-
tected before 16 days (data not shown). Patchy expression
1228
GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 106, No. 5
RINGS ET AL.
is identified
along the total length
days, as indicated
(d.1Id
14
28
e--‘Qc Itn PMD
PMD
by the light
a patchy expression
% w
the proximal
of the intestine
at 16
shaded area. At 18 days
of sucrase-isomaltase
is found at both
and distal ends of the small intestine.
phenomenon
is soon replaced by expression
cytes during
the postweaning
This
on all entero-
period, as indicated
by the
dark shaded area for 21 and 28 days.
Discussion Although
186 nt around nized
the decrease in lactase-specific
the time of weaning phenomenon,
throughout
adult
total
in mammals lactase
activity
is a well-recog-
activity
remains
high
life. This decrease in specific activity,
which is obtained
by dividing
content,
reflects
several
studies
measuring
enzyme activity
possible
by protein
mechanisms.”
lactase mRNA
Several
levels have proposed
that the decrease is the result of posttranscriptional
117
trol mechanisms,‘.’
while others have suggested
conthat the
primary control is at the transcriptional level.“*5 The availability of lactase cDNA probes, as well as antibodies, now allows analysis of changes in the pattern of lactase mRNA
and protein
of expression
at the cellular
level. In
addition, correlation of the different measurements can provide an answer to the question of the level at which
260 200
the regulation
of this small intestinal
The pattern is representative length
of lactase expression of the expression
of the intestine
enzyme occurs. shown
in Figure
of lactase along
before weaning.
1 the
Lactase mRNA
and protein as well as enzyme activity are found in all segments studied in 0-, 7-, and 14-day-old rats in a similar pattern. However, as described recently in newborn rats, the expression
of lactase mRNA
the lower portion of the villus, found in all villous enterocytes.” sion along the vertical remains
constant
axis is established
throughout
is confined
to
whereas the protein is This pattern of expresafter birth and
life. The finding
suggests
either that only enterocytes at the crypt-villus junction synthesize lactase mRNA, which is degraded during mi-
1234567% Figure 3. Lactase mRNA expression along the proximal-ttiistal axis around weaning analyzed by RNase protection assays. (A) Lactase mRNA expression at 14 days in the proximal, mlddle. and distal small intestine (lanes 2. 3, and 4, respectively) and at 28 days (lanes 5, 6, and 7. respectively). At 28 days, a marked decrease in mRNA is found in proximal intestine (lane 5), the middle segment still expresses high levels of lactase mRNA (lane 6), and no expression is found in the distal segment (lane 7). (8) Actin mRNA is present in virtually equal amounts along the intestine at 14 days (lanes 2, 3, and 4) and 28 days (lanes 5, 6, and 7). Lane 1 demonstrates the unprotected lactase and actin riboprobes. Lane 8 shows hybridization of the labeled probes with tRNA.
gration
up the villus,
villus synthesize
or that all enterocytes
lactase mRNA,
along
but with different
the rates
of synthesis and/or degradation between the lower and upper halves of the villus. On the other hand, the presence of lactase protein along the total length of the villus indicates that after biosynthesis, lactase protein is inserted into the microvillus membrane as a stable enzyme. Interestingly, a comparable pattern of sucrase-isomaltase mRNA expression confined to the lower half of the villus has been described in both human and rat small intestines.1s3i9 As stated above, before weaning, lactase mRNA and protein are found along the total small intestine. However, after 14 days of life, a gradual restriction is observed
May 1994
RESTRICTION OF RAT LACTASE GENE EXPRESSION
1229
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical analysis of lactase and suerase-isomaltase protein expression around the time of weaning in the proximal small intestine. (A) At 16 days, lactase protein is present at all enterocytes along the villus. (6) Patchy lactase protein expression is observed at 21 days. (C) Lactase protein is not detectable at 28 days. (D) Patchy suerase-isomaltase expression is found at 16 days in directly adjacent sections. (E) At 21 days, sucrase-isomaltase is present in all enterocytes on the villus. (F) At 28 days, sucrase-isomaltase is observed in all enterocytes on the villus tip, although some cells at the extreme end of the villus tip are faintly stained (bar = 50 pm).
along this horizontal axis. As shown in Figure 2, expression of lactase remains high in the middle small intestine at 28 days of life, with abundant lactase mRNA and protein. In the proximal intestine at 28 days, however, hardly any lactase protein can be visualized, with some detectable
lactase mRNA
only at the base of the villi.
tative measurements of lactase mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity using RNase protection assays, rocket immunoelectrophoresis, and enzyme quantification, respectively, in combination with measurements of transcriptional rate have confirmed that the expression of lactase is predominantly
regulated
at the transcriptional
This marked decrease in lactase mRNA in this segment, compared with the proximal segment in the 14-day-old rat, is also demonstrated by the RNase protection assay
level (Krasinski et al., submitted manuscript). Restriction of lactase expression to the midintestine is accompanied by gradual reduction in the lactase ex-
in Figure 3A (lanes 2 and 5, respectively). However, the slight difference in histological presentation between
pression in the flanking regions. This gradual reduction is characterized by transient patchy protein expression, as shown in Figure 4. This pattern is similar to previously
lactase mRNA
and protein
at 28 days, which was found
only in this segment, can be attributable to technical limitations of the immunohistochemical method, or it can indicate subtle modifications of the principal mechanism of regulation. In contrast, the distal portion of the small intestine shows neither lactase protein nor mRNA. This decrease in lactase mRNA at the cellular level is confirmed by the RNase protection assays, as shown in Figure 3. Thus, primary control of lactase gene expression seems to be at the transcriptional level. Recently, quanti-
described observations in humans and animals.‘2-‘4*2” However, the initial patchy pattern of sucrase-isomaltase in the total intestine before weaning is a novel observation and suggests that patchiness may reflect a developmental regulatory phenomenon. The patchy expression was found only for lactase or sucrase-isomaltase protein and not for lactase or sucrase-isomaltase mRNA. Whether this is real or caused to technical limitations of the in situ hybridization is currently under investigation.
1230
GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 106, No. 5
RINGS ET AL.
Figure 5. lmmunodetection of lactase protein in the most proximal part of the small intestine of a 2ldayold rat (length of segment, 0.5 cm). Three different patterns of lactase protein expression can be recognized: (A) no lactase protein in the most proximal part of this segment; (B) patchy lactase expression in the middle part of the segment; and (C) lactase protein in all enterocytes in the distal part of the segment (bar = 100 pm).
The restriction
of lactase mRNA
from the time of weaning portant
factors.
First,
pressing
lactase during
an area comparable
onward
and protein signifies
postweaning
to that found
development
finding
amounts
of lactase mRNA
Second,
this limited
expression
This corroborates
in the midintestine
more proximally
excovers
in the total intestine
period.
out development.4
several im-
the area in the midintestine
in the preweaning of constant
found
our earlier through-
area of lactase
and patchy
could have implications
expression
for the physio-
logical conditions under which lactose is hydrolyzed, and these findings correlate well with those of others in adult humans. 12,13Around weaning, an upsurge of lactase expression occurs in a relatively short segment in the proximal intestine, of high coincides gion, activity
is seen in the midintestine,
with high levels of activity.
a decrease found
As shown stricted
as shown in Figure 5 at 21 days. A plateau
expression
in expression
in distal
in Figure
proximally
parallels
segment
which
to this re-
the decrease
in
of the small intestine.3
6, the expression and distally
Distal
of lactase
is re-
at 21 days, whereas su-
erase-isomaltase mRNA is found over the full length of the intestine. This finding indicates that in the same enterocyte
different
ble for the control development. Figure 6. Comparison between lactase and sucrase-isomaltase mRNA and protein expression in the distal small intestine of a 21day-old rat. (A) Expression of lactase mRNA in the distal small intestine; no lactase mRNA is detectable. (B) Expression of sucraseisomaltase mRNA in an adjacent section; sucraseisomaltase mRNA is present in the distal ileum. (C) Lactase protein is not detectable in the distal small intestine. (D) Sucrase-isomaltase is clearly detectable in an adjacent section (bar = 100 pm).
regulatory
factors must be responsi-
of these two disaccharidases
At later stages of development, tase mRNA and protein expression
during
the restriction in lacis even more accentu-
ated (Table 1; Figure 7). This postweaning, region-specific restriction of lactase protein at the cellular level parallels the decline of lactase mRNA abundance, indicating control of expression at the transcriptional level. Earlier studies from our laboratory also suggested this
May 1994
RESTRICTION OF RAT LACTASE GENE EXPRESSION
1. Summary of lmmunoreactivity
Table
Data for Disaccharidase
Distribution
1231
During Development
Segmentb Age (length? Lactasez2 16 days 18 days 21 days 28 days SucraseZ3 16 days 18 days 21 days 28 days
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+/+/+ + +
(36 (48 (58 (86
cm) cm) cm) cm)
+/_
+/-
+/-
+/-
+ + + +
(36 (48 (58 (86
cm) cm) cm) cm)
+/+/+ +
+/+/+ +
+/+ + +
+/+ + +
+/+ + +
8
9
+
+
+/-
+/_
+/-
+/+/+ +
+/+/+ +
+/+/+ +
“Total length of small intestine from pylorus to coecum. “Nine segments were taken from total small intestine (see Materials and Methods). f, Continuous immunoreactivity on brush borders of all enterocytes along the vilius; +/-, staining on brush borders of random enterocytes along the villus (patchy expression); -, no immunoreactivity on brush borders of enterocytes along the villus.
primary
control
phenomenon Although
mechanism.*,’
This study
at the histological other investigators
this
also have found a decrease
in lactase mRNA
levels, specifically
around
they
weaning,
confirms
level for the first time.
suggest
in the distal
posttranscriptional
ileum and
along
the length
of the intestine.
specific factors has recently
tase and sucrase-isomaltase.2sS29 nisms also may contribute of these genes.
Other
The presence
been described
of such
for both lac-
However,
other mecha-
to the regulation
of expression
investigators
have presented
evi-
pretranslational regulation.7S27 Our data suggest that the characteristic pattern of both lactase and sucrase-isomal-
dence that the decrease in lactase-specific activity is associated with a change in the rate of enterocyte turnover.
tase expression
Changes
trol,
possibly
is more likely under by a gradient
transcriptional
in DNA-binding
confactors
in the synthesis
development
rate of lactase protein
or in degradation
of the protein,
during have also
been reported.’ The restriction be intrinsic.
the observations
21 d
S
L 20 d S Figure 7. Distribution of lactase (L) and sucrase-isomaltase (S) pm tein along the horizontal axis of small intestine in 16-, 18-, 21-, and 28-day-old rats. This graphic representation is based on data in Table 1. Numbers l-9 indicate the locations of the segments examined (see Materials and Methods), which are presented in Table 1. Disaccharidase distribution along the small intestine, as measured at the nine sites, is represented by different shadings. Changes occurring between two points are arbitrarily shown at midpoint. Bars represent intestines at relative length. The white segment represents no immunodetection. The lightly shaded segment represents patchy expression; only isolated cells express protein (as in Figure 40). The middle darkly shaded segments represent patchy expression; approximately half of the enterocytes along the villus express protein (as in Figure 48). The darkly shaded sections represent expression in all enter* cytes (as in Figure 4A). Arrow, ligament of Treitz.
recently
is not influenced
suckling, suggesting cytes and a minimal
role for luminal
concerning
imprinted programed
appears
and extended
in this study, in newborn
of lactase expression
pothesis L
of lactase gene expression
As we reported
to by
rats the pattern by prevention
of
information in enterofactors.” The hy-
positional
information
in
the intestine along the duodenal-to-colonic axis is strongly supported by data of Rubin et a1.,30 who studied fetal intestinal isografts from normal and transgenic mice for the expression absence
of luminal
of fatty acid-binding
protein
in the
factors.
This study shows the restriction of lactase gene expression along the small intestine during postnatal development around the time of weaning. Concurrently, an upsurge along ingly, zymes villus
of sucrase-isomaltase gene expression can be seen the total length of the small intestine. Interestdepending on the stage of development both enshow patchy protein expression along the cryptaxis.
References 1. Wacker H, Keller P, Falchetto R, Legler G, Semenza G. Location of the two catalytic sites in intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase. Comparison with sucraseisomaltase and with other glycosi-
1232
RINGS ET AL.
dases, the membrane anchor of lactase-phlorizin Biol Chem 1992;267:18744-18752.
GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 106, No. 5
hydrolase.
J
2. Bijller HA, van Wassenaer AG, Raghavan S, Montgomery RK, Sybicki MA, Grand RJ. New insights into the lactase and glycosylceramidase activities of rat microvillus membrane (MVM) lactasephlorizin hydrolase. Am J Physiol 1989;257:G616-G623. 3. Newcomer AD, McGill DB. Distribution of disaccharidase activity in the small bowel of normal and lactase-deficient subjects. Gastroenterology 1966;51:481-488. 4. Biiller HA, Kothe MJC, Goldman DA, Grubman SA, Sasak WV, Matsudaira PT, Montgomery RK, Grand RJ. Coordinate expression of lactase-phlorizin hydrolase mRNA and enzyme levels in rat small intestine during development. J Biol Chem 1990;265:6978-6983. 5. Escher JC, de Koning ND, van Engen CGJ, Arora S, Bijller HA, Montgomery RK, Grand RJ. Molecular basis of lactase levels in adult humans. J Clin Invest 1992;89:480-483. 6. Montgomery RK, Bijller HA, Rings EHHM, Dekker J, Grand RJ. Lactose intolerance and regulation of small intestinal lactase activity. In: Berdanier CD, Hargrove JL, eds. Nutrition and gene expression. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1993:23-53. 7. Freund JN, Duluc I, Raul F. Discrepancy between the intestinal lactase enzymatic activity and mRNA accumulation in sucklings and adults. FEBS Lett 1989; 248:39-42. 8. Sebastio G, Villa M, Sartorio R, Guzzetta V, Poggi V, Auricchio S, Mantei N, Semenza G. Control of lactase in human adult-type hypolactasia and in weaning rabbits and rats. Am J Human Genet 1989;45:489-497. 9. Lloyd M, Mevissen G, Fisher M, Olsen W, Goodspeed D, Genini M, Boll W, Semenza G, Mantei N. Regulation of intestinal lactase in adult hypolactasia. J Clin Invest 1992;89:524-529. 10. Sterchi EE, Mills PR, Fransen JAM, Hauri HP, Lentze MJ, Naim HY, Ginsel L, Bond J. Biogenesis of intestinal lactasephlorizin hydrolase in adults with lactose intolerance. Evidence for reduced biosynthesis and sloweddown maturation in enterocytes. J Clin Invest 1990;86:1329-1337. 11. Witte J, Lloyd M, Lorenzsonn V, Korsmo H, Olsen W. The biosynthetic basis of adult lactase deficiency. J Clin Invest 1990;86:1338-1342. 12. Maiuri L, Raia V, Potter J, Swallow D, Ho MW, Fiocca R, Finzi G, Comaggia M, Capella C, Quaroni A, Auricchio S. Mosaic pattern of lactase expression by villous enterocytes in human adult-type hypolactasia. Gastroenterology 1991;100:359-369. 13. Lorenzsonn V, Lloyd M, Olsen WA. lmmunocytochemical heterogeneity of lactasephlorizin hydrolase in adult lactase deficiency. Gastroenterology 1993; 105:51-59. 14. Maiuri L, Rossi M, Raia V, D’Auria S, Swallow D, Quaroni A, Auricchio S. Patchy expression of lactase protein in adult rabbit and rat intestine. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:1739-1746. 15. Leeper LL, Henning SJ. Development and tissue distribution of sucraseisomaltase mRNA in rats. Am J Physiol 1990;258:G52G58. 16. Rings EHHM, Biiller HA, de Boer PAJ, Grand RJ, Montgomery RK, Lamers WH, Charles R, Moorman AFM: Messenger RNA sorting in enterocytes. Colocalization with encoded proteins. FEBS Lett 1992;300:183-187. 17. Rings EHHM, de Boer PAJ, Moorman AFM, van Beers EH, Dekker J, Montgomery RK, Grand RJ, Birller HA. Lactase gene expression during early development of rat small intestine. Gastroenterology 1992;103:1154-1161.
18. Traber PG. Regulation of sucrase-isomaltase gene expression along the crypt-villus axis of rat small intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1990; 173:765-773. 19. Traber PG, Yu L, Wu GD, Judge T. Sucrase-isomaltase gene expression along the crypt-villus axis of human small intestine is regulated at the level of mRNA abundance. Am J Physiol 1992; 262:G123-G130. 20. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 1984; 137:266-267. 21. Moorman AFM, de Boer PAJ, Vermeulen JLM, Lamers WH. Practical aspects of radio-isotopic in situ hybridization on RNA. Histothem J 1993;25:251-266. 22. Quaroni A, lsselbacher KJ. Study of intestinal cell differentiation with monoclonal antibodies to intestinal cell surface components. Dev Biol 1985; 111:267-279. 23. Yeh KY, Yeh M, Holt PR. Differential effects of thyroxine and cortisone on jejunal sucrase expression in suckling rats. Am J Physiol 1989; 256:G604-G612. 24. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 1979; 18:5294-5299. 25. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989. 26. Nichols BL, Carrazza F, Nichols VN, Putman M, Johnston P, Rodrigues M, Quaroni A, Shiner M. Mosaic expression of brushborder enzymes in infants with chronic diarrhea and malnutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 14:371-379. 27. Duluc I, Galluser M, Raul F. Freund JN. Dietary control of the lactase mRNA distribution along the rat small intestine. Am J Physiol 1992;262:G954-G961. 28. Troelsen JT, Olsen J, Noren 0, Sjbstrbm H. A novel intestinal trans-factor (NF-LPHI) interacts with the lactase-phlorizin hydrolase promoter and co-varies with enzymatic activity. J Biol Chem 1992;267:20407-20411. 29. Traber PG, Wu GD, Wang W. Novel DNA-binding proteins regulate intestine-specific transcription of the sucrase-isomaltase gene. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12:3614-3627. 30. Rubin DC, Swietlicki E, Roth KA, Gordon JI. Use of fetal intestinal isografts from normal and transgenic mice to study the programming of positional information along the duodenal-to-colonic axis. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:15122-15133.
Received July 28, 1993. Accepted November 2, 1993. Address requests for reprints to: Edmond H. H. M. Rings, M.D., Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, G8-260, Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, Melbergdreef 9,1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Fax: (020) 5664440. Dr. Rings is a clinical research fellow (KWO) at the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This work was supported in part by Nutricia and the Irene Kinderziekenhuls Foundation, The Netherlands (H.A.B., E.H.V.B.); by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Grant ROl DK 32658 and by the Center for Gastroenterology Research on Absorptive and Secretory Processes (NIH grant P30 DK 34926) (R.K.M., R.J.G.); and by a NATO Collaborative Research Grant. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1993, Boston, Massachusetts, and pub lished in abstract form (Gastroenterology 1993;104:A643).