Risk of Adverse Neurocognitive Outcomes With PCSK-9 Inhibitors

Risk of Adverse Neurocognitive Outcomes With PCSK-9 Inhibitors

JACC VOL. 69, NO. 22, 2017 Letters 2774 JUNE 6, 2017:2769–76 ...

302KB Sizes 0 Downloads 21 Views

JACC VOL. 69, NO. 22, 2017

Letters

2774

JUNE 6, 2017:2769–76

<25

CHD Events (%)

F I G U R E 1 CHD Event Rates in Primary Prevention Trials

mg/dl

were

not

associated

with

adverse

neurocognitive events. The impact of lipid-lowering medication on cognitive function is an area of

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1

y = 0.0599x - 3.3952 R2 = 0.9305 p=0.0019

ongoing research with mixed evidence. A separate WOSCOPS-P

WOSCOPS-S

including

a

similar

collection

of

clinical trials found a significantly increased risk of adverse

AFCAPS-P

AFCAPS-S

meta-analysis

neurocognitive

events

among

patients

treated with PCSK9 inhibitors (2). The concern over cognitive impact and lipid-

ASCOT-P

altering drugs is based on the reduced availability of lipid-soluble nutrients in the circulation. PCSK9

ASCOT-S

inhibitors offer new lows for lipids, with endpoint 55

75

95

115

135

155

175

195

LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl)

LDL-C values <30 mg/dl in many patients. The study by Robinson et al. (1) compared patients with LDL-C concentrations of <15 mg/dl and <25 mg/dl. The primary endpoint for the PCSK9 inhibitor trials

CHD event rates in primary prevention trials are directly proportional to the on-treatment absolute level of LDL cholesterol. The event rate is predicted to approach 0 at an LDL concentration of approximately 57 mg/dl. AFCAPS ¼ Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis

reviewed was reduction of calculated LDL-C. Studies accounted for the documented underestimation of

Prevention Study; ASCOT ¼ Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial; CHD ¼ coronary

calculated LDL-C by measuring LDL-C by ultracen-

heart disease; LDL ¼ low-density lipoprotein; WOSCOPS ¼ West of Scotland Coronary

trifuge separation. Robinson et al. (1) reported a

Prevention Study. Reprinted with permission from O’Keefe et al. (3).

median

difference

calculated patients

versus and,

of

only

measured thus,

3

mg/dl

LDL-C

suggested

between

across that

all the

Cian P. McCarthy, MBBCh, BAO *John W. McEvoy, MBBCh, MHS

underestimation did not play a significant role.

*Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of

measured and calculated values is significantly

However, the variability in differences between

Heart Disease, and Division of Cardiology

greater at lower LDL-C concentrations (3). Based

Department of Medicine

on our data, a calculated LDL-C of 25 mg/dl can

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

have an actual measured LDL-C value between 7 and

Blalock 524C

45 mg/dl. This phenomenon is actually supported

600 North Wolfe Street

in their report as the range of discrepancies spanned

Baltimore, Maryland 21287

from 14 mg/dl to þ160 mg/dl for patients with

E-mail: [email protected]

LDL-C

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.076

with 24 mg/dl to þ26 mg/dl when LDL-C was

Please note: Both authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

REFERENCES

concentrations

of

<15

mg/dl

compared

between 15 and 25 mg/dl. Misclassification of even small numbers of patients could skew the data significantly for this analysis of cognitive abnormalities. It would be important to rely

1. Ford I, Shah ASV, Zhang R, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin, statin therapy, and risk of coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2719–28.

on the measured LDL-C concentrations to compare

2. Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, et al. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;316:1289–97.

More importantly, providers and patients should be

3. O’Keefe JH Jr., Cordain L, Harris WH, Moe RM, Vogel R. Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2142–6.

Risk of Adverse Neurocognitive Outcomes With PCSK-9 Inhibitors

patients with neurocognitive events to those without. aware of the limitations of calculated LDL-C when managing patients with very low concentrations of LDL-C. *Jeffrey W. Meeusen, PhD Leslie J. Donato, PhD Allan S. Jaffe, MD *Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic 200 First Street Southwest Rochester, Minnesota 55905

The paper by Robinson et al. (1) suggested that

E-mail: [email protected]

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.583

JACC VOL. 69, NO. 22, 2017

Letters

JUNE 6, 2017:2769–76

Please note: Dr. Jaffe is a consultant for and has received honoraria from Abbott, Alere Beckman, ET Healthcare, NeurogenomeX, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, Sphingotec, theheart.org, and Singulex. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. P.K. Shah, MD, served as Guest Editor-in-Chief for this paper. Robert Giugliano, MD, served as Guest Editor for this paper.

randomized controlled trial showed that anakinra

REFERENCES

to most other inflammatory diseases, and we may

1. Robinson JG, Rosenson RS, Farnier M, Chaudhari U, Sasiela WJ, Merlet L, et al. Safety of very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with alirocumab: pooled data from randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69: 471–82.

consider abandoning the term idiopathic also in this

has a spectacular effect in these patients (5), and the term idiopathic seems inappropriate for a disease treated with anti-interleukin-1 agents. The pathogenesis of pericarditis is now comparable

2. Khan AR, Bavishi C, Riaz H, Farid TA, Khan S, Atlas M, et al. Increased risk of adverse neurocognitive outcomes with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10. 3. Meeusen JW, Snozek CL, Baumann NA, Jaffe AS, Saenger AK. Reliability of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Cardiol 2015;116: 538–40.

condition. Antonio Brucato, MD *Anna Valenti, MD Bernhard Maisch, MD *Medicina Interna Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (Torre 4 Piano 4) Piazza OMS 1 24127 Bergamo

Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis

Italy

Still Idiopathic?

Please note: The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Cremer et al. (1) underlined relevant clinical points

REFERENCES

and the role of cardiac magnetic resonance in their

1. Cremer PC, Kumar A, Kontizas A, et al. Complicated pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2311–28.

E-mail: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.072

excellent review. The authors also raised important issues concerning pathogenesis, with which we agree and wish to expand. The term idiopathic pericarditis seems unfortunate in both the first attack and in recurrences and a label of our diagnostic ignorance or unwillingness to search for it. In a biopsy study including 259 patients with large pericardial effusion, the underlying cause was identified by molecular and immunity-histological methods: 12% viral, 35% autoreactive/lymphocytic, 2% bacterial, 15% traumatic, 28% malignant, and 8% other (2). On the other hand, the term idiopathic may be reassuring for the physician but may alarm the

2. Maisch B, Rupp H, Ristic A, et al. Pericardioscopy and epi- and pericardial biopsy- a new window to the heart improving etiological diagnoses and permitting targeted intrapericardial therapy. Heart Fail Rev 2013;18: 317–28. 3. Imazio M, Brucato A, Doria A, et al. Antinuclear antibodies in recurrent idiopathic pericarditis: prevalence and clinical significance. Int J Cardiol 2009; 136:289–93. 4. Caforio AL, Brucato A, Imazio M, et al. Anti-heart and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies: evidence for autoimmunity in idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis. Heart 2010;96:779–84. 5. Brucato A, Imazio M, Gattorno M, et al. Effect of anakinra on recurrent pericarditis among patients with colchicine resistance and corticosteroid dependence. JAMA 2016;31:1906–12.

patient, who does not understand why all the other

REPLY: Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis

diseases, such as hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis,

Still Idiopathic?

and others, are not idiopathic, whereas their disease is. In acute pericarditis, most cases of idiopathic

Dr. Brucato and colleagues raise an important issue in

pericarditis are viral in the first attacks, whereas

the nomenclature of pericardial disease: diagnoses of

recurrences are often due to too rapidly tapered

most patients with acute or recurrent pericarditis are

drug regimen. Other cases seem immune mediated

labeled idiopathic. As the authors note, the term

or autoinflammatory. Possible noninvasive clues

idiopathic elicits a sense of complacency among

for autoimmunity are antinuclear (3) or antiheart (4)

physicians. For patients, the response is the opposite.

antibodies (50% of adults), dry eyes, arthralgias, and

They feel frustrated and alarmed that their clinicians

a

an

seem to know so little about their disease. Given this

autoinflammatory pathogenesis involving a pivotal

predicament, why has idiopathic persisted in peri-

role for inflammosome are acute attacks followed

carditis, and what should the criteria be to abandon

by

the term?

subacute

course.

complete

Conversely,

resolution,

clues

strikingly

for

elevated

C-reactive protein, high fever, and pleuropulmonary

Conventionally, excluding patients with cardiac

are

injury syndromes and underlying autoimmune dis-

generally antinuclear-antibodies negative. A recent

ease, most patients’ conditions are referred to as

and

systemic

involvement;

these

patients

2775