Robustness of periodic point free maps of the annulus

Robustness of periodic point free maps of the annulus

__ __ il!B $-I&& TOPOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS Topology and its Applications 69 (1996) 2 I 1-2 IS ELSBVIER Robustness of periodic point free maps...

310KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

__ __ il!B

$-I&&

TOPOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS Topology and its Applications 69 (1996) 2 I 1-2 IS

ELSBVIER

Robustness

of periodic point free maps of the annulus Glen R. Hall ‘I*, Mark Turpin b

Abstract We construct a diffeomorphism of the annulus into itself which has no periodic points such that when it is composed with any sufficiently small rigid rotation the resulting map still has no periodic points. Keywords: AMS

Periodic orbits; Closing lemma; Rotations

cluss~jication:

58F22;

58F02

1. Preliminaries

We move freely between the closed annulus A = Iw/Z x [0, l] and its universal cover x = R x [0, l] = {(lc,y): 0 < y < I}. We consider maps f: A + f(A) which are homeomorphisms onto their image and homotopically nontrivial. The simplest example is “rigid rotation” by Q E Iw denoted by R,, i.e., R,(z,

y) = (cc + CY,v).

This map preserves the circles {(x, w): 1~= constant}. If cr is rational, then every point is periodic. If a: is irrational R, has no periodic points, however, there exist arbitrarily small E # 0 such that (o + E) is rational so R, o R, = RCY+Ehas periodic orbits. Given a map f : A + f(A) as above, which has no periodic points, it is natural to ask if nearby maps have periodic points. The C’-closing Lemma of Pugh and Robinson [ 121 states that there exist arbitrarily small perturbations of f in the C’ topology which have periodic orbits. Because of the low dimension and simple topology of the annulus, it is reasonable to hope for a stronger result. For example, we might ask if perturbing * Corresponding author. 0166-X641/96/$15.00 0 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDIO166-8641(9S)OO108-S

f by composing

i.e.. R, o f for E arbitrarily

it with a small rigid rotation,

produce

a map with periodic orbits. Arbitrarily

periodic

orbits for circle homeomorphisms.

small perturbations

small, can

of this type produce

Franks has shown that if f : A +

A is an

area preserving homeomorphism without periodic points then there are arbitrarily E such that R, o f has periodic points in the interior of the annulus [6]. In this note we construct Theorem.

an elementary

There exists a map f : A +

image, is homotopic

example proving the following: f(A)

which is a C”

d~@eomorphisrn onto its

to the identip and which has no periodic points, for which there

exists an q > 0 such that if’ 1~1< rl then R, 0

This answers

small

a question

,f

has no periodic points.

in Hall [8]. (The relationship

between

the smoothness

of f

and the rotation number is discussed in Section 3.) Other examples of periodic point free annulus diffeomorphisms have been given by Fathi and Herman (see [5] and Boyland [3]), Handel [9] and Turpin [ 131. Set also Carroll [4] for a “nonclosing” example on the torus. To fix notation, we recall that the rotation number of a point (z, y) E A for a map f : A + A is defined as p(z,y)

=

lim n+oo

(f’“(Z!

y)) - 7r(n:,y) ‘71

when the limit exists, where ~(2, I/) = :E is the projection

2. Construction

onto the first component.

of the example

The example is given as a composition of a number of different maps: (1) We begin with a rigid rotation of the annulus by an irrational a, i.e., R,(z,

y) =

(z + N, y). The number

theoretic properties of (1 will be important when considering the smoothness of the final map (see Section 3). (2) In the next step we compose the map R, with a contraction in the radial direction CA given by

cs=

(r;6(y-;) +a>

where 0 < 6 < 1. The value of S will be fixed in step (3). The map C’s o R, has no periodic points and every point has rotation number (Y.The circle y = l/2 is invariant and is the global attractor associated with the attractor block formed by the entire annulus (see Fig. 1). For this map, for any E > 0 such that ((.y+ E) is rational, the map R, 0 (Cs o Ra) has a circle of periodic points on y = l/2. (3) Next we conjugate C,- o R, with a change of variables which makes the attracting invariant circle more complicated compared with the direction of rigid rotation. Fix 5 to be the disk with center (l/2, l/2) an d ra d’lus less than the minimum of a/2 and l/Z. Let D be a concentric disk with slightly smaller radius. Let @ : A -+ A be a C”

G.R. Hull, M. Turpin / Topology

C,o

R,(%

and its Applicurions

69 (1996)

211-215

1

213

y=l/2

Fig. 1.

x=1

x=0

Fig. 2.

diffeomorphism

which is equal to the identity

outside of 3 and is equal to a clockwise

rotation by 7r/2 about (l/2, l/2) in D. In 6 - D the concentric circles are rotated by interpolating rotation (see Fig. 2). We let g = @ o Cb o R, o ST’. The map g has the circle r = @({(z, l/2)}) as the global attractor and this circle is normally hyperbolic. The map g has no periodic points and every point has rotation number cr. We think of g as the map Cd o R, after a change of variables. The Lyapunov exponent along the invariant circle of g is one (see Herman [lo]) so the invariant manifold theorem of Hirsch, Pugh and Shub [ 1 l] implies that there exists &I > 0 such that if I&( < ~1, R, o g has a smooth invariant circle r,, near r. The perturbation R, of g pushes transverse to the invariant circle r in D but along r outside of 6. Every orbit intersects D (and 5 - D) with a frequency proportional to the length of the intersection of {y = l/2} with D (or 5 - D respectively). The annulus 6 - D can be chosen as small as we like. Here we fix the value of 6 in the definition of Cd from step (1). Choose N large enough so that for each point z on or near the invariant circle for each sequence of N preimages of z there are at least two points in D for each

point in 6 N D. Then choose b < I sufficiently

close to 1 so that SN > 3/4. Since

composition with R, for E > 0 pushes points in D “above” the invariant circle and only points in 5 - D are pushed “below” the invariant circle the condition on 6 guarantees that the net effect of composition with R, for E > 0 on every orbit sufficiently near the invariant circle is to be pushed “up”. The situation for E < 0 is similar. It follows that for small E the r, are pairwise disjoint and hence give a smooth foliation of the annulus near r. So far WC have no control over the rotation number of R, o g on the invariant circle r,. (4) In the final step, we adjust the map g so that the rotation number of R, o g on its invariant circle r, remains equal to CYfor all E sufficiently close to zero. To accomplish this we alter y by composing it with a homeomorphism k such that k(TE) = r, for each E with 1~1 < ~1. Then for each E the map R, o (g 0 k) will still have r, as a global attractor. We fix the map k with the following properties: (i) k(r,) = r, for each E with /E( < E], (ii) there exists 17> 0 such that the rotation number of R, o (g o k)jr, is equal to cy, for all E with /E/ < 7. To verify that such a map k exists WC use the fact that the r, form a smooth foliation of the annulus near r. Hence the maps R, o gj,i give a smooth family of circle homeomorphisms close to glr. Because !I(,. has rotation number o, the correction map k need only rotate along each r, so that the rotation number of R, o (9 o k) is CY. The map k is continuous because the rotation number of a circle homeomorphism is a continuous function of the homeomorphism in the Co topology (see Boyland [Z] to see that k is at least Lipshitz). The smoothness of k is considered in Section 3. Hence g o k is the required map because on the invariant circle r, of R, 0 (g o k) the rotation number is the irrational cy whenever 1~1< rl.

3. Differentiability The map g = @ o Cd 0 R,, 0 @-’ can be chosen to be C”” without difficulty. Since an analytic map sufficiently close to g will share all the necessary properties we may even assume that g is C”. However, the smoothness of the map k which corrects the rotation numbers is much more problematic. If we put smoothly varying coordinates on the circle r,, then the map R, o glr is conjugate to a one parameter family of circle homcomorphisms h, : R/Z + R/Z where the rotation number of ha is cy. We can embed this one parameter family in a two parameter family given by

he>/3= P + h,,. The smoothness of k is equivalent to the existence of a smooth function a(~) such that the rotation number of 1?,,,0(,) is o for all sufliciently small E. That the function P(E) is smooth follows from Arnold 111 and Herman [IO] when Q is sufficiently Diophantine.

(The family h,,p is not in “standard form”, however, when N is sufficiently

Diophantine,

it can be smoothly conjugated into standard from to any order in E.) When the irrational rotation number cy is sufficiently Liouville, the theory of circle maps forces us to predict that Ic will not be smooth (see Hall [7]). It is convenient collect these ideas as a

to

Conjecture.

If f : A + f(A) is a C” diffeomorphism of the annulus A onto its image which is homotopically nontrivial and isotopic to the identity and if there exists a sufficiently Liouville irrational number a and a point z E A such that the rotation number of f at z is p(z) = Q then there exists E arbitrarily close to zero such that R, o f has periodic points.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referee for a correction

and valuable

comments.

References

[ 11 V.I. Arnol’d, Small denominators

I: on the mapping of a circle into itself, Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 25 (1961) 21-86; also: Amer. Math. Sot. Transl. Ser. 46 (1961) 213-284. [2] P. Boyland, Bifurcations of circle maps: Arnol’d tongues, bistability and rotation intervals, Comm. Math. Phys. 106 (1986) 353-381. [3] I? Boyland, The rotation set as a dynamical invariant, in: R. McGehee and K. Meyer, eds., Twist Mappings and Their Applications, IMA Volumes in Mathematics 44 (Springer, Berlin, 1991). [4] C.R. Carroll, Rokhlin towers and C’ closing for flows on T’, Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 12 (1992) 683-706. ]5] A. Fathi and M. Herman, Existence de diffeomorphismes minimaux, Asterisque 49 (SociCtC Mathematique de France, 1977). ]6] .I. Franks, Rotation numbers for area preserving homeomorphisms of the open annulus, in: K. Shiraiwa, ed., Proceedings of the International Conference on Dynamical Systems and Chaos (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995) 123-128. [7] G.R. Hall, Resonance zones in two-parameter families of circle homeomorphisms, SIAM _I. Math. Anal. 15 (1984) 1075-1081. [8] G.R. Hall, Some promes on dynamics of annulus maps, in: Contemporary Mathematics 81 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1988). [9] M. Handel, A pathological area preserving Cm diffeomorphism of the plane, Proc. Amer. Math. Sot. 86 (1982) 163-168. [lo] M. Herman, Sur la conjugaison differentiable des diffeomorphismes du cercle, Publ. Math. IHES 49 ( 1979). [I I] M. Hirsch, C. Pugh and M. Shub, Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 583 (Springer, Berlin, 1977). [ 121 C. Pugh and C. Robinson, The C’ closing lemma, Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 3 (1983) 261-313. [ 131 M. Turpin, Rotation number properties of a class of annulus homeomorphisms, Thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA (1991).