Medical Hypotheses 76 (2011) 474–478
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Medical Hypotheses journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mehy
Role of insulin and testosterone in prostatic growth: Who is doing what? Ajit Vikram, Gopabandhu Jena ⇑ Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history: Received 15 September 2010 Accepted 21 November 2010
Previous studies have demonstrated increased incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in insulin-resistant individuals. In addition to androgens, prostatic growth is sensitive to the peptide growth factors including insulin. Experimental studies employing intervention of selective b-cell toxin streptozotocin and castration suggest that depletion of either insulin or testosterone results in the severe prostatic atrophy (>80%). Exogenous testosterone and diet-induced experimental hyperinsulinemia induces prostatic enlargement in rats. Further, hyperinsulinemia sensitizes prostate towards the growth promoting effect of testosterone, and testosterone augments prostatic growth even in the hypoinsulinemic rats. However, in castrated rats diet-induced hyperinsulinemia fails to promote prostatic growth. Based on these evidences it is hypothesized that in the presence of testosterone insulin plays an important role in the prostatic growth. The epidemiological reports witnessing increased incidences of prostatic enlargement in men with metabolic syndrome, which are known to have increased level of insulin, provides a validating clue to the hypothesis. Further, the hypothesis suggests that targeting insulin signaling pathway could be a new objective for the treatment of prostatic enlargement. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common problem of the aged men population [1]. It is associated with increase in the contractility and/or enlargement of the prostate gland. About 60% of men aged over 50 years have histological evidence of BPH [1]. Today prostatic hyperplasia is the 4th most prevalent disease in the men aged over 50 years [2]. Although, very few studies have been conducted to examine the prevalence of BPH in India, it was found to be in parallel to that of Western countries [3,4]. Despite the high prevalence in the aged men population, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the pathogenesis of BPH is far from complete understanding. Androgens have long been implicated in the prostatic growth, and are known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of BPH. In addition to the androgens, prostatic growth is sensitive to the peptide growth factors such as transforming growth factors, epithelial growth factor, insulin like growth factor, growth hormone and insulin. The increased incidence of BPH in the insulin-resistant individuals has drawn the attention of scientific community to the growth promoting effects of insulin [5]. Experimental hypoinsulinemia and castration causes dramatic decrease in the weight of the prostate gland. However, diet-induced hyperinsulinemia causes increase in the cellular proliferation and the
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 172 2214683x2152; fax: +91 172 2214692. E-mail (G. Jena).
addresses:
[email protected]
(A.
Vikram),
[email protected]
0306-9877/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.11.024
enlargement of the prostate gland. Further, castration leads to the atrophy of the prostate gland in hyperinsulinemic rats [6] and insulin delays castration associated increased apoptosis in the prostate of diabetic rats [7]. Furthermore, diet rich in saturated fat affects the expression of androgen receptor, alpha-adrenergic receptor, peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma (PPARc) in the prostate gland and sensitizes the gland to the growth promoting effects of testosterone [8,9]. Recently Fan et al. reported that insulin like growth factor-1/insulin signaling activates androgen signaling through direct interaction of Foxo-1 with androgen receptor [10]. Based on the experimental and clinical evidences, it was hypothesized that in the presence of testosterone insulin plays an important role in the prostatic growth.
Hypothesis Experimental evidences Depletion of either testosterone (by castration) or insulin (by b-cell selective toxin streptozotocin) results in the remarkable decrease in the weight of prostate gland in rodents. However, at normal level of testosterone or insulin, hyperinsulinemia (induced by high-fat diet feeding) and at normal serum concentration of insulin, hypertestosteronemia (by exogenous administration of testosterone) leads to prostatic enlargement. Hyperinsulinemic condition further augments testosterone induced enlargement of the prostate gland. However, hyperinsulinemia fails to promote
475
A. Vikram, G. Jena / Medical Hypotheses 76 (2011) 474–478 Table 1 Effect of different experimental condition/intervention on the testosterone and insulin level and subsequent effect on the prostate gland. SI. no
Experimental condition/intervention
Level of testosteronea
Level of insulina
Prostatic growthb
References
1 2 3 4 5 6
Control Castration Streptozotocin treatment Testosterone administration High-fat diet feeding High-fat diet feeding and testosterone administration High-fat diet feeding followed by castration Streptozotocin treatment and testosterone administration Streptozotocin treatment and insulin administration
Normal Low Normal or sub-normal High Normal Exogenous administration of testosterone
Normal Normal Low Normal High [9]/not determined[35] High
Normal Smaller Smaller Larger Larger Larger
[9,27,29,51] [52–54] [27–31,51] [9,55,56] [9,35] [9]
Low Exogenous administration of testosterone propionate Sub-normal
High Low
Smaller Larger
[6] [14]
Exogenous administration of insulin
Larger
[9,30,31,51]
7 8 9
a The ‘low’ and ‘high’ was defined by us based on the experimental data presented in the respective literature. High; at least 25% increase from the control value of referred experiment. Low; at least 25% decrease from the control value of referred experiment. b The ‘smaller’ and ‘larger’ was defined by us based on the experimental data presented in the respective literature. Smaller; at least 15% decrease from the control value of the referred experiment. Larger; at least 15% increase from the control value of the referred experiment.
prostatic growth in the castrated rats (Table 1). Further, organ culture experiments suggest that presence of both testosterone and insulin promotes the nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) and protein synthesis and best maintains the prostatic cellular integrity then testosterone or insulin alone [11–13], and presence of insulin is required for the full restorative effect of testosterone on the prostate of castrated rats [14].
Integration of evidences and presentation of the hypothesis Based upon these experimental evidences it can be concluded that (i) testosterone as well as insulin is having prostate growth promoting effects, (ii) presence of testosterone is essential for insulin mediated enlargement of the prostate gland, (iii) in hyperinsulinemic rats synergistic increase in the prostate growth is observed in response to the testosterone, (iv) increased level of testosterone can promote prostatic growth even under hypoinsulinemic condition. The phenomenon is depicted with the help of an analogy in
Fig. 1. These observations are potentially important since epidemiological data suggests increased incidence of BPH in insulin-resistant individuals and provides an explanation for the prostatic enlargement in men with hypogonadism.
Limitations and assumptions Effect of different experimental condition on the prostate weight and biochemical parameters were derived from different studies, where animals of different age and strain have been utilized. To overcome the biasness or faulty conclusions, which might result due to the inter-experimental variations, at least 25% increase or decrease as compared to control value of the referred study in the estimation of the level of testosterone or insulin was considered as high or low respectively. Similarly, in case of prostate size, at least 15% increase or decrease in the weight of prostate gland as compared to that of age matched control group of the referred study was considered as larger or smaller, respectively.
Fig. 1. A hypothetical model depicting the interplay between levels of insulin and testosterone (thickness of the line indicates level of hormone) in the prostatic growth. The present analogy uses levels of hormones as positive and negative potentials, and prostatic growth as glow of the bulb. Key 1 and 2 describes the nature of the influence of insulin and testosterone levels respectively on the prostatic growth. The red double headed arrow in Key 2 indicates the requirement of a minimal level of testosterone to allow the bulb to glow, while the dotted line connection in Key 1 indicates that low level insulin will allow the bulb to glow. With this model we intend to convey the message that (i) threshold level of testosterone (the red double headed arrow in Key 2) is essential for the prostatic growth, (ii) once the threshold level of testosterone is achieved, the increase in the insulin level can promote the prostatic growth, (iii) at very low level of insulin (the continued dash line in Key 1), rise in the testosterone level can promote prostatic growth. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
476
A. Vikram, G. Jena / Medical Hypotheses 76 (2011) 474–478
Epidemiological and clinical observations
Discussion and implications
Recently we have reviewed the inter-relationships between different insulin-resistance associated factors and their possible involvement in the pathogenesis of BPH [5]. Several studies indicates increased incidences of prostatic enlargement and surrogate markers of BPH in men with insulin-resistance syndrome [15–19]. Men undergone sex-reversal demonstrates decrease in the cell number as well as atrophy of the prostate gland [20,21]. However, very less information is available about the size of prostate gland in hypoinsulinemic (type 1 diabetes) individuals.
The optimal concentration of insulin is essential for the functional integrity of the prostate gland [28], and rise in the circulating concentration of insulin results in the enlargement of prostate gland in vivo [9]. Recently it has been reported that dietary intake of saturated fat causes increased expression of PPARc and androgen receptor in the prostate of rats. High-fat diet consisting of approximately 30% animal fat (lard) has long been utilized as a standard method of inducing insulin-resistance in experimental animals which is associated with compensatory rise in the insulin level [32–34]. Although, distinct explanations have been provided, several experimental studies indicates the enlargement of ventral prostate in rats kept on diet rich in saturated fat [8,9,35–37]. Animal studies have indicated enhanced MEK/ERK signaling and increased cellular proliferation in the prostate of diet-induced insulin-resistant rats [6,9,38]. In contrast, few studies suggest that dietary fat (fatty acids) can directly affect the prostatic growth [8,37]. However, the reversal of hyperinsulinemia as well as prostatic enlargement in high-fat diet-fed rats with insulin-sensitizer pioglitazone emphasizes that insulin is playing a central role in the prostatic cell proliferation and growth [6,9,38]. Further, longterm (6 week) administration of exogenous insulin in normal (0.75 IU/kg) and STZ induced hypoinsulinemic (4 IU/kg) rats led to increase in the prostate weight [9]. Other laboratories have also reported restoration of ventral prostate weight in the streptozotocin-induced hypoinsulinemic rats with exogenous insulin [27, 28,31]. Although, these experiments provide evidence for the role of insulin in the prostatic growth, the possibility of the direct role of fat in the prostatic growth cannot be denied. To clearly discern the role of fat and insulin-resistance associated compensatory hyperinsulinemia in the prostatic growth further studies utilizing genetically engineered model such as prostate specific deletion of insulin-receptor or androgen receptor or PPAR alpha/gamma receptor is required. In ventral prostate organ culture experiments co-existence of testosterone and insulin has been found to increase the nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) and protein synthesis than testosterone or insulin alone suggesting the synergistic association between testosterone and insulin [11,13,26]. Further, better reversal of diabetes associated prostatic deformations with the simultaneous use of insulin, testosterone and estrogen then any of them alone indicates the importance of the co-existence of insulin with the steroidal hormone [39]. However, the presence of estrogen makes it difficult to derive direct interpretations about the nature of interaction between insulin and testosterone. Moreover, few more studies have also provided evidence for the synergistic interaction of testosterone and insulin [12,40]. The recent finding that (i) insulin activates androgen-receptor signaling through Foxo-1 (a substrate of PI-3Kinase) [10], and (ii) enlargement of prostate gland in E6-AP over-expressing cells with increased PI-3Kinase activity [24] provides molecular basis and strengthens the hypothesis of synergistic association between insulin and testosterone in the prostatic growth. Aging and androgens is largely accepted to play an important role in the etiopathogenesis of BPH [1,41–43]. Massachusetts Male Aging Study showed steady decrease in the serum androgen levels after 40 years of age despite of increase in the prostate volume [44,45]. Several possible explanations such as change in the estrogen/testosterone ratio, expression of androgen receptor and 5areductase enzyme and production of dihydrotestosterone has been proposed to explain this phenomenon [46–48]. Synergism between insulin and testosterone provides another possible explanation for the development of BPH in men with hypogonadism (sub-normal level of testosterone). The level of testosterone in hypogonadism
Possible molecular mechanisms Insulin signaling initiates on its interaction with the receptor, and branches into two main pathways; one is IRS/PI-3 kinase pathway, primarily concerned with the metabolic effects, second is MEK/ERK pathway, mediating gene-expression and growth-stimulating effects of the hormone [22]. Androgen signaling involves binding of testosterone or dihydrotestosterone to the androgen receptors, the agonist-receptor complex interacts with the DNA and stimulates expression of several growth-regulating proteins [23]. Recently Fan et al. reported IGF-1/insulin signaling activates androgen signaling through direct interaction of Foxo 1 with androgen receptor [10]. Further, in a recent study, Srinivasan et al. reported that E6-associated protein, a dual function steroid hormone receptor coactivator and ubiquitin-protein ligase regulates PI-3Kinase-Akt signaling and prostatic growth [24]. The association between increased activity of PI-3Kinase pathway with the enlargement of prostate gland, and activation of androgen-receptor signaling by the insulin signaling through Foxo-1, which is a substrate of PI-3Kinase provide molecular evidence for the synergistic action of insulin and testosterone in the prostatic growth. Further, hyperinsulinemia is a frequently noted condition in the insulin-resistant individuals, which might augment androgen signaling in the prostate through increased inactivation of the Foxo-1 by IRS/PI3-K branch of the insulin signaling. Furthermore, insulin is known to increase the expression of 5-alpha reductase enzyme (mRNA and protein), which is responsible for the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (10 times more potent than testosterone) in the granulose cells [25]. However, these aspects remain to be experimentally examined in the prostate gland. Hypothesis criticism The hypothesis presented here can be argued basically due to three major drawbacks; (i) lack of transgenic and/or gene knockout study investigating the effect of prostate specific deletion of insulin-receptor and androgen receptor to provide an conclusive support to the hypothesis, (ii) epidemiological findings reporting the size of the prostate gland in type 1 diabetics, and (iii) absence of clinical evidence for the synergistic action of testosterone and insulin on the prostate gland. However, empirical experimental data such as (i) ventral prostate organ culture experiments examining the effect of testosterone and insulin together or alone [11,13,26], (ii) effect of testosterone on the prostate gland in normal and hyperinsulinemic animals [9], (iii) effect of experimental and genetically induced diabetes on the prostate gland [14,27– 31] and (iv) epidemiological evidences indicating increased incidences of BPH in insulin-resistant individuals provide strength to the hypothesis [15,16,18]. Further, literature also supports molecular basis for the interaction between insulin and androgen signaling [10,24].
A. Vikram, G. Jena / Medical Hypotheses 76 (2011) 474–478
is much higher as compared to the castrate level, which might be sufficient for the insulin to elicit its growth promoting effects. Epidemiological findings have also enumerated insulin-resistance associated compensatory hyperinsulinemia as an important risk factor for the prostatic enlargement [15,16,18]. Further, recent studies indicating the association of metabolic syndrome with hypogonadism [49] underlines the importance of the present hypothesis. Considering the epidemiological reports and experimental evidences, it appears that both insulin and testosterone promotes the growth of prostate gland. However the presence of testosterone is a pre-requisite condition for insulin to elicit its growth promoting effects. Further, mechanistic investigations employing transgenic animal models can help to better understand the role of insulin in the pathogenesis of BPH. Currently, pharmacological agents acting on the androgen signaling are the only strategy to control static component of the BPH. However, the socio-psychological side effects such as impotence and loss of libido necessitate a new class of drug for the management of BPH. Screening of new chemical entities which can selectively modulate the insulin signaling in the prostate gland could be new objectives in the new drug development and for the rationale therapeutics of the BPH. Recently a peptide insulin receptor antagonists have been reported [50]. However, its effect on the prostatic growth under hyperinsulinemic condition has not been evaluated. This type of compounds with proper toxicological evaluation and formulation strategies to act selectively in the prostate gland could be a new pharmacological option for the treatment of BPH patients. Conflict of interest statement None declared. Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the financial assistance received from National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, India. References [1] Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, et al. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 1984;132:474–9. [2] Issa MM, Regan TS. Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia – present and future impact. Am J Manag Care 2007;13:S4–9. [3] Mathur SK, Gupta S, Marwah N, et al. Significance of mucin stain in differentiating benign and malignant lesions of prostate. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2003;46:593–5. [4] Mittal BV, Amin MB, Kinare SG. Spectrum of histological lesions in 185 consecutive prostatic specimens. J Postgrad Med 1989;35:157–61. [5] Vikram A, Jena GB, Ramarao P. Insulin-resistance and benign prostatic hyperplasia: the connection. Eur J Pharmacol 2010;641:75–81. [6] Vikram A, Jena GB, Ramarao P. Pioglitazone attenuates prostatic enlargement in diet-induced insulin resistant rats by altering lipid distribution and hyperinsulinemia. Br J Pharmacol 2010;161:1708–21. [7] Damas-Souza DM, Oliveira CA, Carvalho HF. Insulin affects tissue organization and the kinetics of epithelial cell death in the rat ventral prostate after castration. J Androl 2010;31:631–40. [8] Escobar EL, Gomes-Marcondes MC, Carvalho HF. Dietary fatty acid quality affects AR and PPAR gamma levels and prostate growth. Prostate 2009;69: 548–58. [9] Vikram A, Jena GB, Ramarao P. Increased cell proliferation and contractility of prostate in insulin resistant rats: linking hyperinsulinemia with benign prostate hyperplasia. Prostate 2010;70:79–89. [10] Fan W, Yanase T, Morinaga H, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1/insulin signaling activates androgen signaling through direct interactions of Foxo1 with androgen receptor. J Biol Chem 2007;282:7329–38. [11] Ichihara I. Some ultrastructural effects of testosterone and insulin on the ventral prostate of rats in organ culture. Cell Tissue Res 1977;181:327–37. [12] Nguyen-Le XK, Briere N, Corcos J. The effects of insulin, transferrin and androgens on rat prostate explants in serum-free organ culture. Biofactors 1997;6:339–49.
477
[13] Santti RS, Johansson R. Some biochemical effects of insulin and steroid hormones on the rat prostate in organ culture. Exp Cell Res 1973;77:111–20. [14] Sufrin G, Prutkin L. Experimental diabetes and the response of the sex accessory organs of the castrate male rat to testosterone propionate. Biochemical and electron microscopic observations. Invest Urol 1974;11: 361–9. [15] Hammarsten J, Damber JE, Karlsson M, et al. Insulin and free oestradiol are independent risk factors for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2009;12:160–5. [16] Hammarsten J, Hogstedt B. Hyperinsulinaemia as a risk factor for developing benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2001;39:151–8. [17] Hammarsten J, Hogstedt B, Holthuis N, et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome-risk factors for the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1998;1:157–62. [18] Nandeesha H, Koner BC, Dorairajan LN, et al. Hyperinsulinemia and dyslipidemia in non-diabetic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Chim Acta 2006;370:89–93. [19] Parsons JK, Carter HB, Partin AW, et al. Metabolic factors associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2562–8. [20] de Voogt HJ, Rao BR, Geldof AA, et al. Androgen action blockade does not result in reduction in size but changes histology of the normal human prostate. Prostate 1987;11:305–11. [21] Shabsigh A, Chang DT, Heitjan DF, et al. Rapid reduction in blood flow to the rat ventral prostate gland after castration: preliminary evidence that androgens influence prostate size by regulating blood flow to the prostate gland and prostatic endothelial cell survival. Prostate 1998;36:201–6. [22] White MF, Kahn CR. The insulin signaling system. J Biol Chem 1994;269:1–4. [23] Bennett NC, Gardiner RA, Hooper JD, et al. Molecular cell biology of androgen receptor signalling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010;42:813–27. [24] Srinivasan S, Nawaz Z. E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, E6-associated protein (E6AP) regulates PI3K-Akt signaling and prostate cell growth. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010. PMID:20826237. [25] Kayampilly PP, Wanamaker BL, Stewart JA, et al. Stimulatory effect of insulin on 5a-reductase type 1 (SRD5A1) expression through an Akt-dependent pathway in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2010;151:5030–7. [26] Ichihara I, Santti RS, Pelliniemi LJ. Effects of testosterone, hydrocortisone and insulin on the fine structure of the epithelium of rat ventral prostate in organ culture. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1973;143:425–38. [27] Ikeda K, Wada Y, Foster Jr HE, et al. Experimental diabetes-induced regression of the rat prostate is associated with an increased expression of transforming growth factor-beta. J Urol 2000;164:180–5. [28] Suthagar E, Soudamani S, Yuvaraj S, et al. Effects of streptozotocin (STZ)induced diabetes and insulin replacement on rat ventral prostate. Biomed Pharmacother 2009;63:43–50. [29] Vikram A, Tripathi DN, Ramarao P, et al. Intervention of D-glucose ameliorates the toxicity of streptozotocin in accessory sex organs of rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2008;226:84–93. [30] Yono M, Mane SM, Lin A, et al. Differential effects of diabetes induced by streptozotocin and that develops spontaneously on prostate growth in Bio Breeding (BB) rats. Life Sci 2008;83:192–7. [31] Yono M, Pouresmail M, Takahashi W, et al. Effect of insulin treatment on tissue size of the genitourinary tract in BB rats with spontaneously developed and streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2005;372:251–5. [32] Buettner R, Parhofer KG, Woenckhaus M, et al. Defining high-fat-diet rat models: metabolic and molecular effects of different fat types. J Mol Endocrinol 2006;36:485–501. [33] Srinivasan K, Patole PS, Kaul CL, et al. Reversal of glucose intolerance by pioglitazone in high fat diet-fed rats. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2004;26:327–33. [34] Srinivasan K, Viswanad B, Asrat L, et al. Combination of high-fat diet-fed and low-dose streptozotocin-treated rat: a model for type 2 diabetes and pharmacological screening. Pharmacol Res 2005;52:313–20. [35] Cai X, Haleem R, Oram S, et al. High fat diet increases the weight of rat ventral prostate. Prostate 2001;49:1–8. [36] Rahman NU, Phonsombat S, Bochinski D, et al. An animal model to study lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: the hyperlipidaemic rat. BJU Int 2007;100:658–63. [37] Xue L, Yang K, Newmark H, et al. Induced hyperproliferation in epithelial cells of mouse prostate by a Western-style diet. Carcinogenesis 1997; 18:995–9. [38] Vikram A, Jena G, Ramarao P. Insulin-resistance reduces botulinum neurotoxin-type A induced prostatic atrophy and apoptosis in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2011;650:356–63. [39] Favaro WJ, Padovani CR, Cagnon VH. Ultrastructural and proliferative features of the ventral lobe of the prostate in non-obese diabetic mice (NOD) following androgen and estrogen replacement associated to insulin therapy. Tissue Cell 2009;41:119–32. [40] Le Goascogne C, Sananes N, Gouezou M, et al. Testosterone-induced meiotic maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes: evidence for an early effect in the synergistic action of insulin. Dev Biol 1985;109:9–14. [41] Griffiths K, Eaton CL, Harper ME, et al. Steroid hormones and the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 1991;20:68–77. [42] Montie JE, Pienta KJ. Review of the role of androgenic hormones in the epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Urology 1994;43:892–9.
478
A. Vikram, G. Jena / Medical Hypotheses 76 (2011) 474–478
[43] Partin AW, Oesterling JE, Epstein JI, et al. Influence of age and endocrine factors on the volume of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1991;145:405–9. [44] Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, et al. Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:589–98. [45] Gray A, Feldman HA, McKinlay JB, et al. Age, disease, and changing sex hormone levels in middle-aged men: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:1016–25. [46] Bonnet P, Reiter E, Bruyninx M, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate aging: differences in types I and II 5a-reductase and steroid hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels, but not in insulin-like growth factor mRNA levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:1203–8. [47] Heracek J, Hampl R, Hill M, et al. Tissue and serum levels of principal androgens in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Steroids 2007;72:375–80. [48] Liu CC, Huang SP, Li WM, et al. Relationship between serum testosterone and measures of benign prostatic hyperplasia in aging men. Urology 2007;70: 677–80. [49] Makhsida N, Shah J, Yan G, et al. Hypogonadism and metabolic syndrome: implications for testosterone therapy. J Urol 2005;174:827–34.
[50] Schaffer L, Brand CL, Hansen BF, et al. A novel high-affinity peptide antagonist to the insulin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;376:380–3. [51] Soudamani S, Yuvaraj S, Malini T, et al. Experimental diabetes has adverse effects on the differentiation of ventral prostate during sexual maturation of rats. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2005;287:1281–9. [52] Antonioli E, Cardoso AB, Carvalho HF. Effects of long-term castration on the smooth muscle cell phenotype of the rat ventral prostate. J Androl 2007;28:777–83. [53] Kawamura H, Kimura M, Ichihara I. The effect of androgen and estrogen on secretory epithelial cells and basal cells of the rat ventral prostate after longterm castration. Ann Anat 1993;175:569–75. [54] Kiplesund KM, Halgunset J, Fjosne HE, et al. Light microscopic morphometric analysis of castration effects in the different lobes of the rat prostate. Prostate 1988;13:221–32. [55] Rudolfsson SH, Bergh A. Testosterone-stimulated growth of the rat prostate may be driven by tissue hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. J Endocrinol 2008;196:11–9. [56] Thiyagarajan M, Kaul CL, Ramarao P. Enhancement of alpha-adrenoceptormediated responses in prostate of testosterone-treated rat. Eur J Pharmacol 2002;453:335–44.