JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SPECIROSCOPY
120,28-48 (1986)
Rotation-Inversion Spectrum of Monodeutero Isocyanamide, HDNNC MANFREDWINNEWISSERANDJORGENREINSTAEDTLER Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut der Justus-Liebig-Universitiit. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, D-6300 Giessen, West Germany The rotation-inversion spectrum of the isotopic-ally substituted species of isocyanamide HDNNC was observed in the region from 100 to 400 GHz. The 173 observed transitions arising from the inversion states O+and O- were assigned and analyzed using a Watson Hamiltonian (Sreduction). The two Hamiltonians are coupled by an u-type Coriolis resonance (AK. = 0) allowed by the C, molecular symmetry of HDNNC. The off-diagonal matrix elements of this resonance, which are proportional to K,, with the coefficient R,,, were included in the fitting program. The rotational constants found arc:
A B C
0+ State
O- State
196 324.84 (49) MHz 10 243.45800 (58) MHz 9 909.53965 (47) MHz
196 301.96 (64) MHz 10 243.29170 (56) MHz 9 909.53972 (44) MHz
Centrifugal distortion constants were also determined. The inversion splitting between the O+ and O- states was determined to be EbV = 352 1.30(53) MHz and the Coriolis resonance coefficient was found to be R. = 2O4.12(13) MHz. The nuclear quadrupole hypcrfine structure induced by the two nitrogen nuclei was analyzed and the coupling constants were determined. The nuclear quadrupole coupling constants of the normal species, H2NNC, were reanalyzed. Improvements in the spectrometer software since the earlier work made it possible to analyze large numbers of rotation-inversion lines exhibiting nuclear quadrupole inkX&iOnS. 0 1986 AcademicRess, Inc. I. INTRODUCTION
In continuation of our investigations of the high-resolution gas phase spectra of the different isomers of cyanamide, H$JNC (l-6), we have studied the first isotopomer of isocyanamide, namely HDNNC. The millimeter-wave spectrum of the parent species, H2NNC, was observed and analyzed by SchXer et al. (7,8). The inversion splitting between the states O+and O- was found to be 0.369 cm-’ which is indicative of a high barrier to planarity for this pyramidal molecule (8). As can be seen from Fig. 1, isocyanamide is a slightly asymmetric prolate top molecule (qrH x -0.9983, KHD = -0.9965). As in cyanamide the configuration is nonplanar. The barrier to planarity of the NH2 group is low enough so that the effect of inversion of the NH2 group with respect to the heavy NNC group is observable. In a recent communication Jensen and Winnewisser (9) have used this data and calculated the lowest four inversion energies of isocyanamide employing the semirigid invertor Hamiltonian developed by Jensen and Bunker (20). The calculation was based on an ab initio inversion potential function 0022-2852186 $3.00 Copyright 0 1986 by.Acadcmk Ress, Inc. All rightsof reproductionin any form x-cservcd.
28
ROTATION-INVERSION
H2NNC
:
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC x.b *
OH2
29
50pm 77
\
::b HDNNC
OH
\ +-_____ *=(1
0
_______ N F
L Y:N
o--C
I
/-
FIG. I. Structures of isocyanamide (HJWJC and HDNNC) in the principle axis system predicted from ab initio calculations by Vincent and Dykstra (18). The position vectors of the permanent electric dipole moments are also indicated.
calculated by Dykstra and Jasien (I 2) which was refined by fitting to the experimental data (8). The results of these calculations yielded the potential function I’,, = -4313.7~’
+ 2226~~ + 30.9$,
(1)
where p is the out-of-plane angle expressed in radians (see Fig. 1). The potential coefficients are given in cm-‘. The inversion energy for the O- state was calculated to be 0.37 cm-’ relative to the O+state and for the If and I- states 874.07 and 892.07 cm-‘, respectively, with a barrier to planarity of 2070 cm-i. This result of course contrasts with the inversion behavior of HzNCN which exhibits a low barrier to planarity of 5 10 cm-’ and an inversion splitting between the O+and O- states of 49.279 cm-’ using a semirigid bender Hamiltonian (12-14). Independently of the work by Brown et al. (12-Z4), Read et al. (15) measured and analyzed the millimeter- and submillimeterwave rotation-inversion spectrum of cyanamide and arrived at similar results. The separation of the Of and O- states in HDNNC should become even smaller than in H*NNC. One should expect, as for the normal species, intrasystem a-type transitions, and intersystem c-type transitions connecting rotational states of the O+ system with those of the O- system, resulting in a rotation-inversion spectrum.
30
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER
Concerning the molecular structure of H$JNC and its chemical stability relative to other isomers there have been several ab initio calculations (16-20). By comparing the rotational constants calculated from ab initio structures with the experimentally obtained values and the shifts induced by the deuterium substitution, we have found that the molecular structure given by Vincent and Dykstra (18) is closest to the experimental observations. However, to obtain a complete substitution structure for H*NNC, it will be necessary to complete the measurement of further isotopically substituted species. II. EXPERIMENTAL (I)
PROCEDURES
Chemical Preparation of HDNNC
Following the method of our preparation of H2NNC (7, 8) the lithium salt of diazomethane [HNNC]-Lif was hydrolyzed with a slightly acid buffer solution of KDzPO4 in D20 yielding mainly isocyanamide-d, . However, in contrast to the earlier work, the lithium salt of diazomethane was prepared using directly diazomethane and methyl lithium as described by Eistert et al. (21). After mixing 100 cm3 of ether at a temperature of -2°C with a 40% solution of potassium hydroxide, KOH, 15 g Nnitroso-N-methylurea were added while the entire solution was stirred: H2NCON(NO)CH3 + KOH = [H2NCOO]- K+ + HzCNz + H20. After decanting and drying with solid potassium a solution of pure diazomethane in ether. This was added slowly to an ether solution of methyl of - 15°C. The reaction was carried out under
hydroxide pellets for 2 hr, one obtains solution kept at a temperature of 0°C lithium, CH3Li, kept at a temperature a dry Nz gas atmosphere:
HzCNz + LiCH3 = [HCN*]- Li+ + CH4. To this suspension of the lithium salt of diazomethane, we added under continuous stirring 13 cm3 of a saturated potassium dideuterophosphat solution in DzO. The ether solution was then separated from the aqueous solution by decanting and dried over P40r0. Further purification of HDNNC was carried out by removing the solvent and the volatile by-products at a temperature of -30°C until the vapor pressure was down to 0.3 Pa: [HCN2]- Li+ + D+ = HDNNC + Lif. About 10 min are required to vaporize isocyanamide to a pressure of about 1 to 2 Pa in the 16-liter glass absorption cell, when the sample storage vessel is kept at -30°C. Under these conditions the half-life of isocyanamide was found to be 10 min at room temperature and a pressure of 1 Pa. From the recorded spectra we were able to identify not only monodeuterated isocyanamide, but also the dideuterated and normal species. Since the normal species H2NNC appeared instantaneously when we evaporated the monodeutero isocyanamide into the cell, we concluded that isocyanamide is able to easily exchange its hydrogen atoms by wall collisions. By flushing the cell with water vapor having a H:D ratio of 50:50, we were able to achieve the approximate isotope substitution ratios HH:HD: DD = 25:50:25. Therefore, we always had a mixture of three isotopic species in the absorption cell, which made the assignment of weak lines rather difficult.
ROTATION-INVERSION
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC
31
(2) Submillimeter- Wave Spectrometer The spectrometer used for the present measurements is described in detail elsewhere (22, 23). The characteristics of the spectrometer are: l frequency range 100-500 GHz, or for strong lines up to 800 GHz; l Gordy-type frequency multiplication technique, point contact Zener diode, and frequency stabilized Ok&klystrons from 50 to 85 GHz as radiation sources; l InSb detector operating at 1.7 K, l minimal absorption coefficient 3 X lop8 cm-’ at 250 GHz, using a 2-m glass absorption cell with a diameter of 10 cm; l absolute frequency accuracy 30 kHz over the entire frequency range. Over the last few years we have improved mainly the data acquisition and processing system (24). Using a data averager (PAR 4202) and a personal computer (Apple IIe) with a specially built interface, we were able to transfer the 256 point spectra, together with some additional information collected by the dedicated personal computer, from the spectrometer to a main frame computer (CDC Cyber 680). Using this computer, several evaluation and fitting programs could be implemented to analyze the spectra; e.g., a nuclear quadrupole fitting program for two nuclei was used in the analysis of the quadrupole hyperlme structure presented later. III. THEORETICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
HDNNC showed the typical pattern of a slightly asymmetric prolate top rotor with almost equidistant K, = 0 lines for successive J values centered within the K, = 1 doublets. These intrasystem transitions involve the inversion-invariant component pL,of the electric dipole moment. The inversion-variant component pe of the electric dipole moment is involved in the c-type intersystem transitions which are also shown in the Fortrat diagrams given in Fig. 2 for HDNNC and in Fig. 3 for H2NNC. From the comparison of the two Fortrat diagrams it can be seen that the substitution of one hydrogen by deuterium drastically alters the rotation-inversion spectrum: The band center of the ‘QObranches is shifted from 272 to 186 GHz, while the inversion splitting has decreased from 11.1 to 3.5 GHz. In contrast to the transitions observed for the parent species, H&NC, lines arising from HDNNC exhibit no nuclear spin statistics. (1) Molecular Symmetry and Coriolis Resonance In the rigid nonplanar monodeutero isocyanamide molecule, as it is shown in Fig. 1, only the identity symmetry operation is feasible. Due to the finite height of the barrier to planarity, the probability of inversion of the NHD group is nonzero and so the symmetry operation of inversion, i.e., the change of the signs for all coordinates, is also feasible. This symmetry operation may be shown to be equivalent to the point group operation of reflection in the xz plane. According to Bunker (25) HDNNC thus belongs to the C,(M) symmetry group. It was shown earlier (7,8) that the normal species H$INC belongs to the &(M) symmetry group. In order to find out which energy levels of the two lowest inversion states O+ and O- are allowed to influence each other through a Coriolis resonance, we consider the symmetry of the wavefunctions of the energy eigenvalues. Matrix elements of the
32
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER
J
40
:
35
‘:
30
:
25
‘1
20
:
15
‘1
10 5 0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400 450 frequency /Gffz
FIG. 2. Part of the Fortrat diagram of HDNNC. The a-type intrasystem transitions of the qQi and the qR branches are plotted as squares and the c-type intersystem transitions of the ‘Pa, ‘Q, and ‘&, branches are drawn as rhombs. The band center of these c-type transitions is located at 186 GHz. Solid symbols represent measured lines while the position of the open symbols were calculated. A centered dot indicates incomplete or approximate measurements. In the u-type qRbranch only the K, = 1 transitions are shown.
25
FIG. 3. Part of the Fortrat diagram of HrNNC. The u-type intrasystem transitions of the qQ, and the qR branches are plotted as squares and the c-type intersystem transitions of the ‘PO,Q,, and ‘& branches are drawn as rhombs. The band center of these c-type transitions is located at 272 GHz. Solid symbols represent measured lines while the position of the open symbols were calculated. A centered dot indicates incomplete or approximate measurements. In the u-type qR branch only the K. = 1 transitions are shown.
ROTATION-INVERSION
33
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC
Hamiltonian which are nonzero can only be formed by wavefunctions total symmetry: (!I’(Hl\k’) # 0 * I’(*) = I’(*‘).
of the same (2)
The total wavefunction is composed of the rotational wavefunction, the wavefunction for the inversion motion, and the other degrees of freedom which remain unchanged for all energy levels involved in the observed transitions. Therefore these parts of the total wavefunction are neglected in the following symmetry considerations: k = *rot * !I&. Thus the irreducible representation IV)
(3)
of the wavefunction is = IV,)
(4)
* JWid
Papousek and Spirko (26) showed that all the inversion states *l+(n) (n = 0, 1,2, * * - ) exhibit A’ symmetry, while the !I-(@ (n = 0, 1,2, - - - ) states belong to the A” symmetry species. Table I shows the irreducible representations of the rotation and inversion wavefunctions. Concerning the symmetry of the rotational wavefunctions for the Wang matrices, the reader is referred to Gordy and Cook (27). From Table I, we can deduce the following selection rules for energy levels that could affect each other by Coriolis resonance: (1)
Au = odd,
AJ = 0,
AK, = odd,
AK, = odd
(2)
Av = odd,
AJ=O,
AK, = even,
AK, = odd.
Only resonances of the second type, so called u-type Coriolis resonances, were observable in the recorded spectra of monodeutero &cyanamide. The connecting matrix element of the Hamiltonian is (J, K,, Kc, v[HIJ, K,, Kc f 1, v + 1) = R,K,.
(5)
In order to introduce the molecular constant R, into the least-squares fitting program to reproduce the experimental results, the entire structure of the fitting program had to be altered. (2) The Hamiltonian The Hamiltonian which was used in the analysis of the measured transition frequencies consists of four parts: (1) the pure inversion Hamiltonian Hi,, (2) Watson’s S-reduced Hamiltonian for the O+ inversion state H&O+), (3) Watson’s L&reduced Hamiltonian for the O- inversion state H&O-), and (4) the Coriolis resonance term TABLE 1 Possible Irreducible Representations of the Rotation-Inversion
Wavefunctions for C, Symmetry
34
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER TABLE II Observed and Calculated Transition Frequencies of Monodeutero Isocyanamide, HDNNC
LYl8l -
16, 191 0,191 201 0.20,
-
17, ,8( L9,
0;17, 0.18, 0.19,
119905.9611 159865.8235 119843.9196
199866.8942 119842.8531
219792.3195
219191.1999
*59132.0,09 279597.8682
259731.1991 279 696.9158
3196*0.41*6 339516.8408 3,91,9.,0**
279697.9212 (56, 299660.1910 (55, 319620.4961199, 339 576.8461151, 359 929.6481 ,631 379478.1124175, 199429.8927191,
0.0218 -0.5,55
L 0
0.0110
L
0.0231
I
3196,9.2,,, 339 576.9341 379476.6916
60 946.,653,136, 61 162.8656,1712, 121 909.,*ol
223459.3869 243,6,.3082 264 06L.lW6 284 J6*.9,,4 321918.996, 345236.0080 985 798.6002
120895.9958 L6L 181.9799 I** 33L.9167
16,1*9.*400 181 333.3171 221616.3710
221614.9986
261891.3496 *8*ll*5.3849
261890.63cl4
322 289.1591 342 410.6749
322 289.8395 342 421.0672 382 108.1695 102 932.5332
120 912.1313
69 966.cmO ,,a*, 8005,.5,0, ,,IOI, 99195.6961 ,*0*9, 119919.808L 12291 139890.0329 (811 159866.8324162, 1,9843.,*.99,57; 199818.5715 (57, 219791.18291961 239762.1321 (55, *59731.,110 193,
-0.029,
1
3,9111.*573,78~ ,991**.3**0,96,
-0.599,
0
ROTATION-INVERSION
SPEDRUM
35
OF HDNNC
TABLE II-Continued
0.0146 o.oo*l
1 1
-0.0032 -0.0055 -0.0041 -0.0401
1 L 1 I
-0.0196 -0.1395
1 0
-2.ZL23 -9.9461
0 0
0.0214
0.5
0.0482 0.0913
0.5 0
0.0295 0.0619
0.5 0
0.0321
1
0.0180
1
0.0236 -0.0010
1 1
-0.0019
0.5
0.2128 0.0110
0 1
0.0197 0.0136
I I
-0.0234 0.0266
, I
-0.0302 0.0012
1 1
0.0019
0.5
-0.0231
0.6
-0.0395 -0.0695
0.5 0
-0.0582 -0.0928
0.5 0
-0.0016
1
-0.0168
1
0.0068 0.0110
1
1
1
-0.0315 -0.0015
0.0371 0.0512
1 1
-0.2261 0.0606
0 1
O.OZLS -0.0258
1 1
0.0207 0.0031
1 1
-0.0189 -0.0400
L 1
0.0119
1
-O.OPOS
1
0.026, 0.0036
1
-0.0315 -0.0282
1
0.0130 0.0283
1
1
1
-0.0104 -0.0335
0.0101
1
-0.0539
,
0.0215 O.O,SI
I 1
-0.0158 -0.0521
L 1
0.0315
1
-0.0429
I
0.0486
I
0.0521
,
-0.0129 -0.0487
1 1
9.5417
0
0.0801 0.0808
, I
I
1
1
1
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER TABLE II-Continued c-type 0-- 0’
c-type o+.-oFreg”e”c,er ,“HZ
abr.-ca,c.
abrerred CalC”l.,Std.D~“.,,hl”Z Yt.
Frequencler /II”1
c.bl.-CaIC.
obrerred C.lC”I.,Std.Der.I/“HZ Yt.
2,3018.0987 2*,,40.5,**
Hmh, connecting the two pure rotational Hamiltonians. Furthermore centrifugal distortion constants up to the eighth order had to be included in order to fit the lines with high K, values. The Hamiltonian may be given as (28) @A = H&O+)
(6)
IX& = A,~O-) + Ei”, a-o-
= firoin”
(7)
ROTATION-INVERSION
31
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC K, = 2
E hc /cm-l
0+
0-
211.1 J=23 210.6
I
195.6 J = 22
J=21
3=20 166.3
J= 19
140.31
140.01
FIG. 4. Part of the energy level diagram of HDNNC. The small ax&s on the energy levels symbolize their shift due to the Coriolis resonance observed in the spectra. The irrtrasystem transitions indicated by long arrows were used in Fig. 5 to illustrate the intluence of the resonance on the transition frequencies.
H,
= l/2@ + C)P’ + {A - [(B + C)/2]}P; - DJp
- &pP:
- D&
+ [(B - C)/4 + d,P2](p: + P?) + d*(p4++ P!) + H&E + &Jp*E
- J&Fe
- LKJP*e,
(J, Kcz,Kc,O+IHroinvIJ~ Kz,Kcf l,O-) = R&a,
(8) (9)
where A, B, C are the rotational constants, and DJ, DJK, DK, dl, d2 are the quartic centrifugal distortion constants. The quantities HJK and HKJ are sextic centrifugal distortion constants and the LJK and Lm are centrifugal distortion constants of eighth order. Ra is the Coriolis resonance coupling constant. P, P,, P,, and P, are the operators for the total angular momentum and its components, respectively. The ladder operators aregivenbyp, =P,kI’P,. IV. ANALYSIS OF THE MMW DATA OF HDNNC
As mentioned above the rotation-inversion spectrum consists of u-type intrasystem and a c-type intersystem transitions. In terms of selection rules, this can be written: AUinv= 0,
AJ=O,fl,
AK, = 0,
AK,= fl
AL+,,“=1,
AJ=O,kl,
AK,=rtl,
AK, = 0.
38
WINNEWISSER AND RJZINSTAEDTLER
ot
I 1.
7 I.
I.
I.
I.
I.
14
16
18
20
22
I.
24
I.
26
J"
FIG. 5. Effect of the Coriolis resonance on the u-type qR2-branch Of intrasystem transitions. The difference between the calculated frequencies allowing for Coriolis resonance (R. # 0) and ignoring the resonance (R.= 0)is plotted versus the rotational quantum number J. Again solid symbols represent observed transitions, while the dotted symbols indicate uncertain assignments. The O- intrasystem transitions show the same deviations with opposite sign.
Figures 2 and 3 give an overview of the dominant series in the spectrum for the HDNNC species and the parent species. For clarity the high K, transitions allowed in the frequency range shown have not been entered. The u-type intrasystem transitions are indicated by squares (Kl), while the c-type intersystem transitions are plotted using rhombs (0). The solid symbols represent measured transitions, while the positions of the open symbols were calculated using the adjusted molecular constants listed in Table II and the Hamiltonian presented in Section III. Symbols with a centered dot indicate transitions which were measured and assigned, but were not included in the fit due to resonances which were not analyzed, or which were not measured for all K, values (in the u-type R branch). (1) a-Type Spectrum The most intense lines in the spectrum belong to the u-type R branch. The assignment of those lines was, with some exceptions, straightforward. All transitions appeared as close doublets in the spectra, due to the small difference of the effective rotation constants in the two inversion states O+ and O-. The intensity ratio of the doublets is 1: 1 in contrast to the normal species (7, 8), due to the absence of nuclear spin statistics. The frequency interval between the doublet lines is smaller in monodeutero isocy-
ROTATION-INVERSION
39
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC
TABLE III Parameters of Isocyanamide (HDNNC and H2NNC) for Watson’s S-Reduced Hamiltonian in the Y-Axis Representation Parameter
HDNNC
H2NNCa 0-
0+
A
/MHz
196
6
/MHZ
10
C
/MHz
324.84(49)b 243.458
196
OOL58)
9 909.539
10
68147)
301.96(64) 243.291
9 909.539
4.625
282
686.50120.00)
70(56)
10
761.522
23(33)
72144)
10
525.292
19127)
831891
DJ
/kHz
DJK
/kHz
OK
/MHZ
dl
/Hz
-223.49(23)
d2
/Hz
-50.38(69)
5.269
/HZ /HZ
LJK
/Hz
LKJ
/Hz
R,
/MHz
451150)
421.79(12)
316.89(12)
214.OOl18.00)
55.63(181
-176.04(10) -34.34166)
1.74(21)
HJK HKJ
Einv
averaged
0.90(33)
-272.6t7.5)
-63O.Ol20.0) -0.304135)
-0.055(10) 4.17(13)
22.7t1.3)
204.12(13) 3
/MHZ
Number
of
Data
(Std.
dev.
of
a)
From
b)
Numbers
ref. in
521.30(53)
11
173 fit)
/kHz
061.80(9.20)
240
29.3
25.0
(8). parentheses
are
standard
deviations
in
units
of
the
last
digits.
anamide than in H*NNC. This is indicative of the fact that the two inversion states O+ and O- are lower in energy and thus closer together than in HJVNC. The asymmetry splitting of the K, = 1,2,3 transitions and the nuclear quadrupole hype&e structure of transitions with small K, were used to confirm the assignment of the lines observed unambiguously. For some of the low Jtransitions the quadrupole components of the inversion doublet lines overlapped and a detailed calculation had to be carried out to evaluate the coupling constants and the unsplit line positions. (2) c-Type Spectrum The quadrupole hyperfine structure of the c-type transitions was extrapolated from that observed in the normal species H&NC (8, 23). We were able to assign two series of transitions which showed the typical splitting and almost constant 2:l intensity ratio, which was also observed for the parent species (see Figs. 6d and 7d). These transitions had to be the two ‘Qo branches. The J assignment was made by comparing
40
WINNEWBSER
AND REINSTAEDTLER
a
b
I.5 3 i 5 2
I.0
I.0
.5
.5
% L
p
;: ; ”
<
0.
0.
-.5 -.5
161064.5
161065
161665.5 hqumcy
161666 Mfz
161065.5
161067
161133.5
161134.0 161134.5 161135.0 rrequncy m
161135.5
c ;
2.0
2.0
1.5
f E i L
1.n
I.0
0.
0.
% 5 2 ; ”
-.5
-1.U
126652
126653
126654
126655
FrG. 6. Typical quadrupole hyperhne structures of transitions of HDNNC. The upper traces were observed, while the lower traces were calculated using a least-squares fitting program. (a)-(c) each show two transitions with overlapping quadrupole structures. The numbering (a) to (d) of the figures corresponds to the lineshape types quoted in Table N: Fig.
Transition
Unperturbed frequency (MHz)
8 (5, 4,0+)- 7 (5, 3,0+) 8 (5, 4,0-)- 7 (5, 3,0-) 8 (4, 5,0+)- 7 (4, 4,0+) 8 (4, 5,0-)- 7 (4, 4,0-) 6 (4, 3,0+)- 5 (4, 2,0+) 6 (4, 3,0-)- 5 (4, 2,0-) 33 (1,33,0_)-33 (0,33,0+)
161 086.2461 161085.0937 161 135.1745 161 133.9509 120 853.6136 120 852.6761 113 251.0918
the predicted and the measured frequency differences between adjacent transitions of different J. The final confirmation of this assignment was achieved by application of the Ritz combination principle. The transitions belonging to the inverted P branch were assigned after the first fit was carried out and the rotationql Fonstants were precise enough to predict these transitions. However, we were unable to assign’all measured lines. Some rather weak lines were observed, which may be c-type tra&ions of higher K, subbands, transitions from molecules in vibrationally excited states, or from other
ROTATION-INVERSION
41
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC b 3
1.5
;
5 2
I.0
-d L
P
.5
; ;;
0. ” -.5
-.a
-.6
-.4
170134.5
-.2 shlIt
i
.2
.4
.6
-.6
/Hfz
170135.0 frqquency /mz
170135.5
-.4
-.2
170071.0 d
0 shift
.2
.4
.6
.B
A&
170071.5 frqumcy &Hz
170072.0
~i~~~~I~~~~~._‘~i~~~~;~‘T_7
-1.0
-1.0 -1.5
-I
169975.5
-.5 rhlfl
0 Rib
169576 169976.5 frqumcy
I
.5
-1.5
-1
-.5
i shill
.5 /Mb
I
1.5
2
I..I...I..I..
169577 lm77.5 t-Hk
lsmll
FIG. 7. Typical quadrupole hyperfme structures of transitions of HJVNC. The upper traces were observed, while the lower traces were calculated using a least-squares fitting program. The numbering (a) to (d) of the figures corresponds to the lineshape types quoted in Table V: Fig.
Transition
Unperturbed frequency (MHz)
a b
8 (4, 5,0-)- 7 (4, 4,0_) 8 (5, 4,0+)- 7 (5, 3,0+)
170 135.0316 170 071.5125
:
288 (6, (1,28,0+)-28 3,0-)- 7 (6, (0,28,0-) 2,0-)
216 169 976.7151 813.2329
isotopic species (H*NNC, DzNNC). For DJWC some strong a-type R-branch transitions were assigned, but the information they yielded was insufficient to determine precise rotational constants. (3) Influence of the Coriolis Resonance and Analysis of the Spectrum By employing our earlier method (8,23) of analysis with two separate Hamiltonians for the two inversion states O+ and O-, which are separated by the inversion splitting energy +JL, we were unable to fit and reproduce all measured transition frequencies for HDNNC. Some lines showed approximately equal deviations of opposite sign in the O+ and O- data sets. Inspection of the energy level diagram displayed in Fig. 4 and
42
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER TAR1 F IV
Quadrupole Coupling Constants Determined from Selected Transitions of HDNNC Transition vl
J(Ka.Kc,
-
Unperturbed
J(Ka.Kc.
frequency
VI
6( 3, 4,0+1
- 5( 3. 3.0+)
120
61 3. 4.0-j
- 5( 3. 3.0-j
120
880.9669
8( 5, 4,o+j
- 7( 5. 3,Of)
161
086.2461
8( 5, 4,O‘)
- 7( 5, 3.0-j
161
085.0937
91 6, 4,0+)
- 8( 6. 3.0+)
181
160.2672
9( 6, 4.0-j
- 8( 6. 3.0-I
181
159.0614
'.atNH)
Xbb(NH1
xbblNCl
Xaa(NCl
Typea
881.9303
8( 4, 5.o+j
- 7( 4. 4,o+j
161
135.1745
8( 4, 5.0-j
- 7( 4. 4.0-1
161
133.9509
9( 5, 5,o+j
- 8( 5. 4.0+)
161
219.7060
9( 5. 5.0-j
- 8( 5, 4.0-1
161
216.4048
5.02716)
0.31
1.9
-0.95
h
b
5.1911141
0.31
1.9
-0.95
A
b
5.149(331
0.31
1.9
-0.95
A
b
5.068(15)
0.3!
1.9
-0.95
6
b,c
4.945(l)
0.31
1.9
-0.95
8
b,e
-0.95
C
b
6( 4. 3.0+)
- 5( 4, 2,0+)
120 853.6136
6( 4, 3,0-I
- 5( 4, 2.0-j
120
852.6761
6.11
0.31
1.66(l)
5( 1, 5.0-1
- 5( 0. 5,0+1
187
161.7858
5.11
0.051(12)
1.64
-0.82
0
6( 1, 6.0-J
- 6t 0, 6,0+1
186
163.2984
5.11
0.171t84)
1.64
-0.82
D
7( 1, 7.0-1
- 71 0, 7,0+1
185
033.8765
5.11
0.311(O)
1.64
-0.82
D
81 1, 8,0-l
- 81 0, 8,0+)
183
723.9431
5.11
0.404114)
1.64
-0.82
D
91 1. 9,0-1
- 9( 0. 9.0+1
182
257.8224
5.11
O.OOlf24)
1.64
-0.82
D
16( 1.16.0-I
-16(
0.16.0+)
167
943.5303
5.11
0.36211)
1.64
-0.82
D
16( 1,16,0+1
-16(
0.16.0-1
160
956.2184
5.11
0.40316)
1.64
-0.82
D
17( 1,17,0-1
-171 0,17.0+)
165
373.8684
5.11
0.383(2)
1.64
-0.82
D
17( 1,17,0+1
-171 0,17,0‘)
158
390.3918
5.11
0.396(l)
1.64
-0.82
D
32(
1,32,0+)
-32(
109
907.4587
6.11
0.367(O)
1.64
-0.82
D
33(
1.33.0-J
-33(
0.33.0’l
113
251.0918
5.11
0.408(O)
1.64
-0.82
0
33(
1,33,0+x
-33(
0,33.0-l
106
347.9305
5.11
0.400(351
1.64
-0.82
D
529.9924
0,32.0-)
19(
0.19.0-1
-18(
1,17.0+1
169
19(
0.19,0+1
-18(
1,17.0-I
162 681.7328
5.11
0.390(6)
1.64
-0.82
D
5.11
0.400(4)
1.64
-0.82
0
221
0,22,0-1
-21(
1.20,0+)
218 351.2258
5.11
0.37918)
1.64
-0.82
D
22(
0,22.0+1
-21(
1,20.0-)
211 426.1326
5.11
0.393(45)
1.64
-0.82
D
231
0,23,0-j
-22(
1.21,0+)
234 132.6903
5.11
0.320(22)
1.64
-0.82
D
23(
0,23.0+)
-22(
1,21.0-)
227 215.9259
5.11
0.381llOl
1.64
-0.82
D
a)
The
typ(ca1
llnerhapes
observed
transition
b) Doublet.
COnsfstIng
quadrupole C) Meakly Table
patterns
split
Notes
are shown
in Fig.
61-d.
where
a, b, c, or d corresponds
e
to the type of the
proflle. The asymmetry
of the D+ and 0- transitions. were
lineshape.
fitted
doublet
was
unresolved.
Both
slmultaniausly.
4 weight
of 0.5 was
used
in the calculation
of the average
Constants
III
VI.
d) Ouadrupole calculating e) Perturbed
pattern
is perturbed
the average quadrupole
values
llneshape:
by the Corlolls in Table Coupling
resonance.
The coupling
VI. Constants
were
not used.
constants
were
not used
in
ROTATION-INVERSION
5
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC
6
7
a
43
9
J” FIG. 8. Change of the x66 (NH) quadrupole coupling constant as a function of J quantum number due to the decreasing influence of the Coriolis resonance.
the symmetry of the wavefunctions of the energy eigenvalues indicate the possibility of a Coriolis resonance interaction. After the inclusion of the a-type Coriolis resonance interaction terms in the Hamiltonian as discussed above, we were able to reproduce almost all the transition frequencies within the experimental accuracy. The observed and calculated transition frequencies are given in Table II. The influence of the Coriolis resonance on the transition frequencies was observable in the a-type R branch for K, = 1 lines with low J quantum numbers and for K, = 2 lines with high J quantum numbers. In the c-type @branch transitions at low J, the effects of the Coriolis resonance could also be observed (see following section). An example of the influence of the Coriolis resonance. on the rotational energy eigenvalues is sketched in Fig. 4. To demonstrate the effect of these Coriolis-induced shifts of the energy eigenvalues on the measured transition frequencies, Fig. 5 shows the shift in frequency relative to the unperturbed line positions of the a-type R-branch transitions (K, = 2,0+ system) versus the rotational quantum number J. The unusual frequency shifts can be understood by inspection of the energy level diagram and the energy shifts indicated there. Unfortunately, we were unable to observe all the shifted lines shown in Fig. 5; again the solid symbols represent the measured transitions. With the Hamiltonian given in Eqs. (6)-(g), we fitted the 173 measured and assigned transitions, using the least-squares method. The adjusted rotational constants are listed in Table III. We found that none of the centrifugal distortion constants differed significantly for the two inversion states O+ and O-. Therefore, they could be fitted for both states together in order to reduce the number of variable parameters, without any significant loss in accuracy. To allow a direct comparison with the rotational constants of HJVNC, we have included the average value of those constants in Table III. The measured transition frequencies and their deviations from the calculated values, together with some predicted line frequencies, are listed in Table II. The standard deviation of the best fit (Table III) was 29.3 kHz for 173 transitions which corresponds to the absolute frequency accuracy of the spectrometer. (4) Nuclear Quadrupole Hyperjine Structure in HDNNC Monodeuterated isocyanamide, HDNNC, possesses three nuclei which have nuclear quadrupole moments. These are the two nonequivalent nitrogen nuclei, indicated as
44
WINNEWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER TABLE V Quadrupole Coupling Constants Determined from Selected Transitions of H,NNC Transition
J(Ka,Kc,
Unperturbed
V) - J(Ka,Kc,
VI
Frequency
Kaa("H'
Xbb(NH'
%a(%)
xbblNC)
Typea
Notes
8( 4, 5.0')
- 7( 4, 4,0+1
170
139.3605
5.156(15)
0.4
1.64
-0.82
A
b
B( 4, 5.0-j
- 7( 4, 4.0-i
170
135.0316
5.050(22)
0.4
1.64
-0.82
A
b
8( 5. 4.o+j
- 7( 5, 3,0+)
170
071.5125
5.092(120)
0.4
1.64
-0.82
B
b
5( 3. 3,0+1
- 4( 3, z.o+j
106
372.2150
5.393(62)
0.4
1.669113)
-0.9
C
b,c
8( 6, 3.0+1
- ?( 6. 2.0')
169
980.5033
5.153(17)
0.4
1.836121)
-0.9
c
b
8( 6. 3.0-j
- 7( 6. 2.0-j
169
976.7151
5.193(22)
0.4
1.818(33)
-0.82
C
b
5.14616)
0.4
1.876(6)
-0.9
C
b
5.113(25)
0.4
1.867(O)
-0.9
C
b
22(
1.22.0+1
-22(
0.22,0-1
232
664.4074
5.12
0.628(4)
1.6
-0.9
0
23(
1,23,0+)
-23(
0.23,0-)
230
224.6412
5.12
0.633(13)
1.8
-0.9
0
24(
1,24,0+)
-24(
0.24.0-I
227
700.3279
5.12
0.632(l)
1.8
-0.9
0
251
1.25.0')
-25(
0,25.0-j
225
094.1624
5.12
0.629(15)
1.8
-0.9
0
26(
1.26,0+)
-261
0,26,0-)
222
408.9819
5.12
0.652(S)
1.8
-0.9
0
27(
1.27,0+)
-2?[
0,27.0-)
219
647.6711
5.12
0.741(l)
1.8
-0.9
0
28(
1,2B.O+)
-28(
0.28.0-)
216
813.2329
5.12
0.638(2)
1.8
-0.9
D
291
1,29.0+)
-29(
0.29,0-)
213
908.7939
5.12
0.662143
1.8
-0.9
D
21( 0,21.0-)
-2O(
1.19.0+)
160
580.9721
5.12
0.619(31
1.8
-0.9
0
221
0.22.0+1
-21f
1.20.0-1
157
552.9493
5.12
0.612(25)
1.8
-0.9
0
24(
0.24.0-1
-23(
1.22.0+)
216
019.6268
5.12
0.643(11)
1.8
-0.9
cl
a) The
typical
observed bl The
lineshapes
transition
asymmetry
c) Perturbed average
doublet
quadrupole values
are
shown
in Fig.
7a-d,
where
a, b, c, or d corresponds
to the
type
c
of the
profile. was
unresolved.
pattern.
in Table
the coupling
constants
were
not used
in the calculation
of the
VI.
NH and NC, and the deuterium
nucleus. All three nuclei have nuclear spins of 1. Thus, a complex hyperfme pattern can be expected for each rotational transition, as has been observed and analyzed for example in diazirine (3). However, no transition observed showed more than four hyperfine features as can be seen from Fig. 6. Most of the transitions show only the 2: 1 doublet splitting mentioned earlier and displayed
ROTATION-INVERSION
SPECTRUM OF HDNNC
45
TABLE VI Mean Values of Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling Constants (in MHz) of HDNNC and H&WC HDNNC
xaaINH' XbbiNH)
Xcc'NH' ’
Xbb - xcc)(NH) xaa(%'
’
H*NNC
present work
Schafer (8,23)
5.093(84)a
5.129144)
5.300(500)b
0.391(14)
0.635114)
present work
-5.404
-5.764
5.875
6.399
1.65 c
1.849(23)
-6.ooof6oo~b 0.7
-6.7
1.8
xbbCNC)
-0.83 d
-0.92 d
0.0
Xcc(Nc)
-0.83 d
-0.92 d
-1.8
xbb - Xcc)(NC)
0.0
0.0
1.8
Numbers fn parentheses are the standard deviations of the average values in units of the last digits. Estimated standard deviation, see Schafer (23). Only one transition was evaluated. There was no additional splitting observable in the c-type transitions, therefore (xbb - Xc,) = 0 for the NC-nucleus.
in Fig. 6d. As in HzNNC (see Fig. 7) only the 14N-nuclear quadrupole interactions are observed, the influence of the deuterium quadrupole could not be resolved. In the analysis of the quadrupole splitting a whole-line fitting program was used which adjusts the quadrupole coupling constants of the two nuclei, the linewidth, and the position of the unsplit line frequency to reproduce the lineshape recorded with the spectrometer. We analyzed the quadrupole hyperhne structures of 30 transitions. The individual results are shown in Table IV. As is generally the case for a near-prolate top molecule at moderate or high J, the a-type transitions were influenced mainly by the X~ coupling constants, while the splittings of the c-type transitions were determined by the (xbb - xcc) values. Usually a cyanide nitrogen exhibits a much stronger quadrupole coupling than the isocyanide nitrogen (29,X)). Thus, we expected small values for the quadrupole coupling constants of the isonitrile nitrogen Nc, while the amide nitrogen NH should show a stronger quadrupole coupling. The xa of the Nc was determined from a line profile analysis of the transition shown in Fig. 6c. Since the c-type transitions observed showed no additional splitting due to the Ne atom, we deduced that the difference (xbb - xcc) is almost zero for Nc. From this assumption we calculated the coupling constants xbb and xcc listed. Since a small difference (x~ - xcc) would only afkct the f&ted linewidth of the c-type transitions, the possible uncertainties of these two constants are consid-
46
WINNEWISSER
AND
REINSTAEDTLER
TABLE VII Remeasured Transition Frequencies of HJVNC Transition
Frequencies
/MHz
Difference
valuea
(new
/MHZ
J(K,.K,, v) - J(K,.K,, v)
new value
old
- old)
5( 3, 2,0+1 - 4( 3, 1,0+1
106 372.2150
106 372.266
-0.0510
8( 4, 4,0+) - 7( 4. 3,o+j
170 139.3605
170 139.3757 b
-0.0152 b
81 4, 4,0-) - 71 4, 3,O'1
170 135.0316
170 135.0328 b
-0.0012 b
8( 5, 3,0+) - 7( 5, 2,o+j
170 071.5125
170 071.5353 b
-0.0228 b
8( 6, 2,0+) - 7( 6, l,O+)
169 980.5033
169 980.4945 b
0.0088 b
8( 6, 2.0-j - 7( 6, 1,0-l
169 976.7151
169 976.7068 b
0.0083 b
22( 1,22,0+1 -22L 0,22.0-1
232 664.4074
232 664.404
0.0034
23( 1,23,0+) -23( 0,23,0-j
230 224.6412
230 224.646
-0.0048
24( 1,24,0+) -24( 0,24,0-)
227 700.3279
227 700.350
-0.0221
25( 1,25,0+) -251 0,25.0-)
225 094.1624
225 094.1573 b
0.0051 b
26( 1,26,0+) -26( 0,26,0-j
222 408.9819
222 408.9654 b
0.0165 b
271 1,27,0+) -27( 0,27,0-j
219 647.6711
219 647.6537 b
28( 1,28,0+) -28( 0,28,0-j
216 813.2329
216 813.234
-0.0011
29( 1,29,0+1 -29( 0,29,0-j
213 908.7939
213 908.775
0.0189
0.0174 b
211 0,21,0-) -2Of 1.19,0+)
160 580.9721
160 581.0209 b
-0.0488 b
22( 0,22,o+j -21( 1,20,0-j
157 552.9493
157 552.9317 b
0.0176 b
24( 0,24,0-j -231 1,22.0+)
216 019.6268
216 019.627
a)
Obtained
b)
Calculated
by
SchPfer from
the
et
al.
constants
-0.0002
(8,231. given
by
Schafer
et
al.
(8,231.
erably larger than for xaa (Nc). The quadrupole coupling constants of the Nu atom were determined from several transitions showing the 2: 1 doublet splittings. The typical lineshapes are shown in Fig. 6. The errors attached to the constants listed in Table VI are the standard deviations of the average values from all analyzed transitions listed in Table IV. By analyzing the quadrupole structure of some of the low J c-type Q-branch transitions, the influence of the Coriolis resonance on the quadrupole hyperhne structure of these lines could be observed. Figure 8 shows the change of xbb(NH) with decreasing J value, or increasing strength of the Coriolis resonance. This effect is an additional aspect of the Coriolis resonance described above. (5) Nuclear Quadrupole Hyperfine Structure in HzNNC After completing the quadrupole hyperfine structure analysis of HDNNC, we found a discrepancy between the coupling constants obtained for HDNNC and those reported
ROTATION-INVERSION
SPECTRUM
47
OF HDNNC
TABLE VIII Barrier to Planarity and Inversion Splitting between 0’ and O- States of Some Amines (in cm-‘) Inversion spllttlnq
Barrier
MOleCUl.2
parent
2023a
Ammonia
0.7943=
monodeutero
dideutero
n.4os93b
a.17o74b
Cyanamide
51oc
49.568d
33e
15e
Anlllne
526f
40.Bf
24.4f
13.4f
Isocyanamlde
20704
0.368h
al Papousek and Splrko I.261 c) Brown
et al.
bl Cohen and Picket (311 d) Read
113)
0.015j
0.11751
et al.
(15)
e) Tyler et al. 132)
fl Kydd and Krueger (331
g) Vincent and Dykstra (18)
hl Scha'fer et
i) present work
jl Jensen and Wu'new~sser
al.
(8,23) (9)
for the normal species (8, 23) as given in Table VI. Therefore a reanalysis was mandatory. We measured 17 selected transitions of the normal species, HzNNC, and reanalyzed the hyperhne structure. The results of the individual analyses are listed in Table V. We were able to confirm the xna constants reported earlier within their quoted uncertainties, but the xbb and xcc constants reported by Schafer et al. (8, 23) were in error. We found that a sign error had probably occurred in the calculation of xbb and xcc from the difference (Xbb - xec). In order to illustrate this, we have included in Table VI not only the newly found coupling constants, but also the old values given by Schafer et al. (8,23). As can be seen from Table VI, the nuclear quadrupole coupling constants for the two isotopic species of isocyanamide agree very well. In Table VII, we compare the transition frequencies of H2NNC recently measured, with those given by Schafer et al. (8, 23). v.
DISCUSSION
From the results collected above, we have shown that the rotation-inversion spectrum of monodeuterated isocyanamide presents distinct aspects different from that of the parent species. A set of observable Coriolis resonances has been identified and included in the analysis. A further resonance, which probably affects the c-type Qbranch transitions at high J, could not yet be analyzed. From the observed shifts of the rotational constants upon deuterium substitution, we conclude that the ab initio structure calculated by Vincent and Dykstra (18) represents the molecular structure very well. For a complete experimentally determined structure more isotopomers have to be measured and analyzed. The quadrupole hyperline structure of both isotopic species was analyzed extensively. This was made possible through the improved software. We can now contribute the HDNNC entries to Table VIII where the inversion splittings of various molecules are compared. The change of the inversion splitting upon deuteration is much larger, relative to the value in the H2 species, than in the other listed amines.
48
WINNBWISSER AND REINSTAEDTLER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors expresssincerethanks to Dr. Brenda P. Winnewisserfor many helpful discussionsand criticallyreadingand commentingon the manuscript.We alsothankDr. J. Koput for hishelpand comments withthe Coriolisresonancediscussion. The chemical preparation of HDNNC was carried out by F. Holland.
We thank him for his help. The experimental work was in part supported by funds from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie. All calculations were carried out at the Hochschulrechenzentrum of the JustucLiebig-University, a service which is gratefully acknowledged. RECEIVED:
April 17, 1986 REFERENCES
I. M. BIRKAND M. WINNEWISSER, Chem. Phys. Lett. 123,382-385 (1986). 2. M. BIRKAND M. WINNEWISSER, Chem. Phys. Lett. 123,386-389 (1986). 3. M. WINNEWISSER, K. MOLLER,AND A. GAMBI, The microwave, infrared and ultraviolet spectra of diazirines: Interpretation and physical aspects, in “The Chemistry of Diazirines” (M. T. H. Liu, Ed.), CRC Press,Boca Raton, 1986/1987. 4. J. VOGTAND M. WINNEWISSER, Z. Nuturforsch. 38a, 1138-1145 (1983). 5. J. VOGT, M. WINNEWISSER, K YAMADA, AND G. WINNEWISSER, Chem. Phys. 83,309-318 (1984). 6. E. !~C-FER AND M. WINNEWISSER, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 97, 154- 164 (1983). 7. E. SC~FER, M. WINNEWISSER, AND J. J. CHRISTIANSEN, Chem. Phys. L&t. 81,380-386 (1981). 8. E. SCHAEFER AND M. WINNEWISSER, Ber. Bunsenges.Phys. Chem. 86,780-790 (1982). 9. P. JENSEN AND M. WINNEWISSER, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (1985/1986). 10. P. JENSEN AND P. R. BUNKER,J. Mol. Spectrosc. 94, 114- 125 (1982). II. C. E. DYKSTRAAND P. G. JASIEN,unpublished results, 1982. 12. R. D. BROWN,P. D. GODFREY,ANDB. KLEIB~MER, J. Chem. Sot. Chem. Commun., 784-785 (1985). 13. R. D. BROWN,P. D. GODFREY,ANDB. KLEILI~MER, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 114,257-273 (1985).
14. B. KLER@MER,Microwave Spectroscopy and Theoretical Models of Nonrigid Molecules,” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Chemistry, Monash University, 1986. 15. W. G. READ,E. A. COHEN,AND H. M. PICKET&J. Mol. Spectrosc. 115,316-332 (1986). 16. B. T. HART,Austr. J. Chem. 26,461-476 (1973). 17. J. B. MOFFAT,J. Mol. Struct. 52,275-280 (1979). 18. M. A. VINCENTANDC. E. DYKSTRA,J. Chern. Phys. 73,3838-3842 (1980). 19. K. ICHIKAWA,Y. HAMADA,Y. SUGAWARA,M. TSUBOI,S. KATO,ANDK. MOROKUMA,J. Chem. Phys. 72,301-312 (1982). 20. C. THOMSONANDC. GLIDEWELL, J. Comp. Chem. 4, l-8 (1983). 21. B. EISTERT,M. REGITZ,G. HECK,AND H. SCHWALL,Aliphatische diazoverbindungen, in “HoubenWeyl, Bd. X/4” (E. Mtiller, Ed.), Verlag, Stuttgart, 1968. 22. E. SCHAEFER ANDM. WINNEWISSER, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 87,327-334 (1983). 23. E. mFER, Dissertation D26, Fachbereich 14, Chemie, Justus-Liebig-Universitiit Giessen, 1982. 24. J. REINSTAEDTLER, Diplom thesis, Fachbereich 13, Physik, Justus-Liebig-Univetsitit Giessen, 1985. 25. P. R. BUNKER,“Molecular Symmetry and Spectroscopy,” Academic Press, New York, 1979. 26. D. PAFOUSEK AND V. SPIRKO,Top. CWT. Chem. 68,60-102 (1976). 27. W. GORDYAND R. L. COOK, Microwave molecular spectra, in “Techniques of Chemistry,” Vol. 18, Wiley, New York, 1984. 28. J. K. G. WATSON,Aspects of quartic and sextic centrifugal effects on rotational energy levels, in “Vibrational Spectra and Structure” (J. R. Durig, Ed.), Vol. 6, Else& Scientitlc, New York, 1977. 29. L. E. SNYDER,J. M. HOLLY, AND D. BUHL,Astrophys. J. 215, L87 (1977). 30. F. C. DE LUCIAAND W. GORDY, Phys. Rev. 187,58 (1969). 31. E. A. COHENAND H. M. PICKET,J. Mol. Spectrosc. 93,83-100 (1981). 32. J. K. TYLER,J. SHERIDAN, AND C. C. C&TAIF&J. Mol. Spectrosc. 43,248-36 1 (1972). 33. R. A. KYDDAND P. J. KRUEGER,Chem. Phys. Let. 49,539-543 (1977).