Safety of Fibrinogen Concentrate and Cryoprecipitate in Cardiovascular Surgery: Multicenter Database Study

Safety of Fibrinogen Concentrate and Cryoprecipitate in Cardiovascular Surgery: Multicenter Database Study

Accepted Manuscript Safety of fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate in cardiovascular surgery: multi-center database study Takuma Maeda MD, MPH,...

NAN Sizes 0 Downloads 19 Views

Accepted Manuscript

Safety of fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate in cardiovascular surgery: multi-center database study Takuma Maeda MD, MPH, PhD , Shigeki Miyata MD, PhD , Akihiko Usui MD, PhD , Kimitoshi Nishiwaki MD, PhD , Hitoshi Tanaka MD, PhD , Yutaka Okita MD, PhD , Nobuyuki Katori MD, PhD , Hideyuki Shimizu MD, PhD , Hiroaki Sasaki MD, PhD , Yoshihiko Ohnishi MD , Yuichi Ueda MD,PhD PII: DOI: Reference:

S1053-0770(18)30388-4 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.001 YJCAN 4749

To appear in:

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Received date:

20 March 2018

Please cite this article as: Takuma Maeda MD, MPH, PhD , Shigeki Miyata MD, PhD , Akihiko Usui MD, PhD , Kimitoshi Nishiwaki MD, PhD , Hitoshi Tanaka MD, PhD , Yutaka Okita MD, PhD , Nobuyuki Katori MD, PhD , Hideyuki Shimizu MD, PhD , Hiroaki Sasaki MD, PhD , Yoshihiko Ohnishi MD , Yuichi Ueda MD,PhD , Safety of fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate in cardiovascular surgery: multi-center database study, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (2018), doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.001

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Safety of fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate in cardiovascular surgery: multi-center database study Takuma Maeda, MD, MPH, PhD1,2,*[email protected], Shigeki Miyata, MD, PhD2, Akihiko Usui, MD, PhD3, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki, MD, PhD4, Hitoshi Tanaka, MD, PhD5,Yutaka Okita, MD, PhD5, Nobuyuki Katori, MD, PhD6, Hideyuki Shimizu, MD, PhD7, Hiroaki Sasaki, MD, PhD8,

aDepartment

of Anesthesiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

of Transfusion Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

cDepartment

of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

dDepartment

of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

eDepartment

of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

AN US

bDivision

CR IP T

Yoshihiko Ohnishi, MD1 ,Yuichi Ueda, MD,PhD9

f

Department of Anesthesiology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

gDepartment hDepartment

of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

*Correspondence

of Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan

M

iPresident

author: Department of Anesthesiology and Division of Transfusion Medicine,

Abstract

To

investigate

whether

administering

fibrinogen

concentrate

or

CE

Objectives:

PT

Fax: +81-6-6872-8175

ED

National Cerebral and, Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan,

cryoprecipitate is associated with increased postoperative thromboembolic events and improved mortality in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery.

AC

Design: Multi-center retrospective cohort study using propensity-score analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis to control for confounders. Setting: Four hospitals (one national cardiovascular center and three university hospitals).

Participants: Patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between January 2010 and October 2012 (n=1047). Interventions: We compared outcomes in patients treated with fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate (fibrinogen group) with those not receiving these products (no-fibrinogen group) based on propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analysis 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

was then performed to confirm the results. Measurements and Main Results: Among 1047 patients enrolled in this study, 247 patients received fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate. The median amount of administered fibrinogen was 3 g (interquartile range: 2–4 g). Eighty-seven patients were excluded from the propensity score matching because of missing data. Propensity score-matched analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of

CR IP T

thromboembolic events or 30-day mortality rate between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the fibrinogen group showed no significant difference in thromboembolic events (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.95; P=0.408) or mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–1.12; P=0.081) compared with those in the no-fibrinogen group.

Conclusions: Administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate was associated

AN US

with neither thromboembolic events nor 30-day mortality in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. Administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate are safe and do not appear to increase thromboembolic events and mortality in thoracic aortic surgery patients.

ED

cardiovascular surgery.

M

Keywords: fibrinogen; fibrinogen concentrate; cryoprecipitate; massive bleeding;

Complex cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be associated

PT

with excessive bleeding1. Because several previous studies reported an association between bleeding and mortality2

3,

an optimal hemostatic strategy is desirable.

CE

Fibrinogen, which reaches critically low levels first among the clotting factors during

AC

major blood loss and volume replacement4, is a promising hemostatic target in cardiovascular surgery5 6. The Japanese Red Cross, which is the only organization in Japan to collect and supply blood for use in transfusion, does not provide cryoprecipitate, and fibrinogen concentrate is approved in Japan only for patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency. Therefore, some hospitals produce cryoprecipitate in their own transfusion divisions, or they administer fibrinogen concentrate off-label.

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Theoretically, administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate raises plasma fibrinogen levels rapidly without volume overload, reversing coagulopathic bleeding by enhancing the strength of blood clot formation, resulting in less intraoperative bleeding However, recent results of randomized control trials studying this issue are

contradictory

9 10 11, 12,

likely because of their relatively small sample sizes and the

CR IP T

7 8.

difficulty involved in enrolling patients with severe bleeding into randomized control trials. An added concern is potential thromboembolic complications that worsen patients’

outcomes

because

fibrinogen

concentrate

and

cryoprecipitate

are

AN US

procoagulatory drugs. In fact, several studies have shown an association between elevated plasma fibrinogen and risk of arterial and venous thrombosis

13 14.

However,

there is only limited evidence regarding the safety of fibrinogen concentrate and

M

cryoprecipitate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

We hypothesized that concentrated fibrinogen products (fibrinogen concentrate and are

associated

with

ED

cryoprecipitate)

improved

mortality

without

increased

postoperative thromboembolic events. The goal of this multicenter study was to

PT

investigate our hypothesis using the database from the Japanese nationwide registry

CE

for cardiovascular surgery, which we combined with data on the administration of fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate retrieved from electronic medical records in

AC

each hospital, analyzing the data using propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis.

Materials and Methods

Patients and study design

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study involved four hospitals: National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (Osaka, Japan), Keio University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan), Kobe University Hospital (Hyogo, Japan), and Nagoya University Hospital (Aichi, Japan). This study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution and met

CR IP T

the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was waived by the board because of the anonymous nature of the data. We enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years undergoing thoracic vascular surgery with CPB between January 2010 and December 2012. Thoracic vascular surgery was divided into four groups: root surgery,

AN US

arch surgery, thoracic surgery, and combined surgery. Root surgery included mainly ascending artery replacement with or without additional surgeries such as valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting. Arch surgery included mainly total

M

arch replacement with or without additional surgeries such as valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting. Thoracic surgery included mainly descending thoracic

ED

aneurysm and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs. Combined surgery included mainly

PT

patients undergoing total arch replacement and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

CE

Data collection

Data were collected from the hospitals’ electronic medical databases, which are

AC

uploaded to the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Database. This database consists of clinical information for all patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery in almost all hospitals in Japan, the details of which were described elsewhere15. The variables contained in the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Database are almost identical to those in the Society for Thoracic Surgeons' National Database, which collects detailed clinical information for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the Japan Adult Cardiovascular

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Database lacks data on the administration of fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate; therefore, we retrieved this data from electronic medical records in each hospital and incorporated the data into the analyses.

CR IP T

Outcomes

The primary outcome was thromboembolic events (postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and limb ischemia) during intensive care unit (ICU) stay. We defined thromboembolic events as: postoperative stroke, newly-emerged

AN US

paralysis of the central nerve system persisting more than 72 hours before discharge; postoperative myocardial infarction, newly-elevated cardiac biomarkers (creatine phosphokinase isoenzymes or creatine kinase MB isoenzyme greater than twice the

M

upper limit of the reference range, or elevated troponin); and postoperative pulmonary embolism diagnosed by lung perfusion scintigraphy or angiography; and limb ischemia

ED

and any complication caused by limb ischemia. The secondary outcome was 30-day

CE

PT

mortality.

Management of anticoagulation, and cardiopulmonary bypass

AC

This was an observational study, and anticoagulation and cardiopulmonary bypass management were neither controlled nor standardized. Usually, we administered 300– 400 U/kg of unfractionated heparin as a priming dose for anticoagulation for CPB to achieve an activated clotting time > 400 seconds. After CPB discontinuation, we used protamine to neutralize heparin. Postoperatively, patients were transferred to the ICU for monitoring and mechanical

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ventilation; patients were extubated when standard criteria were met. Usually, dynamic mechanical thromboprophylaxis (intermittent compression devices or pneumatic compression devices) or graduated compression stockings were used

CR IP T

postoperatively if there were no contraindications.

Transfusion practices

This was an observational study, and transfusion practices were neither controlled nor standardized. We usually administer red blood cells with a target hemoglobin level of 9–

AN US

10 g/dL, and this policy did not change through the study period. The administration of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrate were at the discretion of attending anesthesiologists

and

cardiac surgeons.

Usually,

FFP

was

administered

for

M

international normalized ratios > 1.5, and platelet concentrate was administered for platelet counts < 100 000 platelets/µL. In the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular

ED

Center, cryoprecipitate was transfused if fibrinogen was < 150 mg/dL. Usually, one pool of cryoprecipitate was prepared from 1440 ml of FFP, and the pool contained

PT

approximately 2 g of fibrinogen. In Nagoya University Hospital and Kobe University

CE

Hospital, fibrinogen concentrate (Fibrinogen HT; Japan Blood Products Organization, Tokyo, Japan) was administered if fibrinogen was < 150 mg/dL at weaning from CPB or

AC

when the attending surgeon believed that fibrinogen concentrate was required because of surgical bleeding. In Keio University Hospital, neither fibrinogen concentrate nor cryoprecipitate was used intra- or postoperatively; only FFP was administered, targeting a fibrinogen concentration of 120–150 mg/dl based on surgical hemostasis. As an antifibrinolytic agent, tranexamic acid was used at the anesthesiologist’s discretion.

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Statistics First, we eliminated patients with missing characteristics data (Fig 1). Then, we performed propensity score (PS) matching to balance patients’ backgrounds between the fibrinogen administration group (patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate or

CR IP T

cryoprecipitate) and no-fibrinogen group (patients not receiving fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate). PS was calculated to predict the probability of receiving fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate based on the predictors in Table 1 using a logistic regression model. We performed one-to-one patient matching between fibrinogen and

AN US

no-fibrinogen groups with the closest estimated PS within one caliper (≤ 0.2 of the pooled standard deviation of estimated logits) using the nearest-neighbor method. We estimated the balance in baseline variables using standardized differences, where >

M

10% was considered imbalanced16. We compared 30-day mortality and perioperative thromboembolic events between the groups using the 2 test.

ED

Second, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to confirm the results. To calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for 30-day mortality

PT

and thromboembolic events during ICU stay, variables with a P-value < .2 with

CE

univariate logistic regression analysis were selected for the multivariate logistic regression model with a forced entry of use of fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate.

AC

Regarding “age”, we calculated odds per 10 years and, as for “duration of operation” and “duration of CPB”, we calculated odds per 1-hour increase, for easier understanding, clinically. Multiple imputation was used for the multivariate logistic regression analyses to account for variables with missing data (n=1047). We performed all statistical analyses using IBM SPSS, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Results

CR IP T

We enrolled 1047 patients during the study period. Postoperative outcome parameters in the four hospitals are shown in the supplementary table (Supplementary Table). To perform PS matching, we excluded 87 patients because of missing characteristics data, and analyzed data for 960 study patients. Our PS matching created 191 pairs of

AN US

patients with and without fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate administration (Fig. 1). The median amount of administered fibrinogen was 3 g (interquartile range: 2–4 g) in the fibrinogen group, which was calculated by assuming that one pool of

M

cryoprecipitate contained 2 g of fibrinogen.

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the unmatched and PS-matched groups.

ED

After PS matching, standardized differences for the measured covariates, except degree of urgency, type of surgery, and hospitals, were < 0.1, suggesting that groups were

PT

generally well-balanced. Table 2 shows the proportion of 30-day mortality and the

CE

incidence of thromboembolic events between the PS-matched groups. We found no significant difference in the incidence of both outcomes between the groups. Even with

AC

1:2 and 1:3 matching, we found no significant difference in the incidence of both outcomes between the groups (data not shown). Next, to confirm these results, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. We identified several variables that differed between patients who experienced perioperative thromboembolic events (N=105) and those who did not (N=942) (Table 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that carotid vessel disease (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.24–4.07;

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

P=0.008) and duration of operation (per 1-hour increase: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.29; P=0.003) were significantly associated with thromboembolic events. However, administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate was not associated with thromboembolic events. Similarly, age (per 10-year increase: OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03–

CR IP T

1.97; P=0.031), preoperative resuscitation (OR, 14.07; 95% CI, 3.77–52.5; P<0.001), and duration of operation (per 1-hour increase: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02–1.40; P=0.028) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality (Thirty-five of 1047 patients died). However, administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate was not associated

M

AN US

with 30-day mortality (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18–1.12; P=0.081) (Table 4).

ED

Discussion

This study investigated whether administering fibrinogen concentrate or to

treat

PT

cryoprecipitate

bleeding

is

associated

with

increased

postoperative

CE

thromboembolic events and/or improved mortality in patients undergoing thoracic vascular surgery with CPB. In this multicenter retrospective study using national

AC

registry data, PS matching revealed that administering fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate was associated with neither thromboembolic events nor 30-day mortality, which was confirmed by multivariate logistic regression models with a multiple imputation method for missing data. Previous randomized controlled trials have attempted to confirm the efficacy, but not the safety, of fibrinogen concentrate. 9 10 11, 12 These studies, given a low event rate of

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

adverse events, are rarely powered to address safety issues. For example, death was reported in only 2/60 patients in the fibrinogen group, and none occurred in the control group in a recent randomized controlled trial12. Another randomized controlled trial reported thromboembolic events in 6/78 patients (7.7%) in the fibrinogen group and

CR IP T

10/74 patients (13.5%) in the placebo group11. A recent retrospective single-center cohort study suggested that perioperative administration of fibrinogen concentrate to bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery is not associated with increased incidence of major adverse cardiac and thromboembolic events and mortality17, which is consistent with

AN US

our findings. Contrasting with the previous study, which investigated patients undergoing cardiac surgery (with the exception of patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta17), we investigated patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery, which

M

can be a more complex surgery with a higher risk of massive bleeding. We also enrolled patients from four different institutions, which potentially contributed to external

ED

validity18.

The ideal clinical situation in which to use fibrinogen concentrate or

PT

cryoprecipitate remains unknown. Theoretically, fibrinogen is the first coagulation

CE

factor to reach critically low levels during major blood loss and volume replacement, functioning both as a source of fibrin and as a mediator of platelet aggregation 4.

AC

Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that rapid increases in fibrinogen levels would be more beneficial in patients undergoing complex surgery with a high risk of massive bleeding. To test this hypothesis, we investigated patients who underwent thoracic aortic surgery. Fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate were not used at all in one hospital, which may have worked in favor of PS matching because neither fibrinogen concentrate nor cryoprecipitate was used, even in severe cases. Our results confirmed

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

the safety of fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate in our chosen patient population. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the OR of fibrinogen or cryoprecipitate use for 30-day mortality missed statistical significance (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18–1.12; P=0.081). In our additional logistic regression analysis dividing

CR IP T

fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate as explanatory variables, we found that fibrinogen concentrate may effectively reduce mortality (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05–0.84). Further studies with a higher study power may clarify the effect of using fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate.

AN US

We acknowledge several limitations of this study. First, because of the observational nature of this study, inference of causality is limited. Also, patients may have left the study, and misdiagnosis of rare adverse events is possible. For example,

M

spinal cord ischemia might present as stroke and be misidentified as a thrombotic complication. It is also possible that some events could have been missed because of the

ED

absence of standardized protocols. Second, although this study was based on multicenter data, the data were collected retrospectively. Despite using PS matching to

PT

reduce bias related to confounding, we cannot eliminate the possibility that there may

CE

be unobserved confounders such as differences in perioperative management between hospitals, practices, other blood product management systems, and the high likelihood

AC

that bleeding patients receive fibrinogen. Our PS matching results are generalizable only among patients in the PS range included in the paired analysis, and these results may not be applicable to patients with scores outside this range. However, we conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis using a multiple imputation method for missing data, and confirmed the robustness of the results. Third, our database lacked data on antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid used intraoperatively and

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

anticoagulation therapy with antiplatelet or anticoagulation agents preoperatively, which may also have affected our results. Fourth, we lack laboratory data for perioperative fibrinogen levels or viscoelastic tests, which may be useful in guiding appropriate use of fibrinogen products, and this may have affected our results. Fifth, we

CR IP T

experienced 105 thrombotic events and 35 deaths. Considering this small number of deaths, the logistic regression analysis may have been affected by overfitting.

In conclusion, this study revealed that treatment with fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate was associated with neither thromboembolic events nor 30-day

AN US

mortality in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery.

Acknowledgments

M

This research was supported in part by the Research Grant for Regulatory Science of

ED

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

PT

(AMED) and a grant-in-aid from the Takeda Science Foundation. We thank Jane Charbonneau,

CE

DVM, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

AC

Source of support:

This research was supported in part by the Research Grant on Regulatory Science of

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development,

AMED, and a grant-in-aid from the Takeda Science Foundation.

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Conflicts of interest:

Yuichi Ueda received speaker honoraria and consulting fee from CSL Behring K.K. (Tokyo, Japan).

Shigeki Miyata received research support and speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

CR IP T

(Tokyo,Japan), Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (Osaka, Japan), and CSL Behring K.K.

(Tokyo, Japan). None of the other authors declare any conflicts of interest.

1.

AN US

References

Sniecinski RM, Levy JH: Bleeding and management of coagulopathy. J

2.

M

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:662-667,2011

Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, et al.: Increased mortality,

ED

postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation 116:2544-2552,2007 Koch CG, Li L, Duncan AI, et al.: Morbidity and mortality risk associated

PT

3.

CE

with red blood cell and blood-component transfusion in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Crit Care Med 34:1608-1616,2006 Hiippala ST, Myllyla GJ, Vahtera EM: Hemostatic factors and replacement

AC

4.

of major blood loss with plasma-poor red cell concentrates. Anesth Analg 81:360-365,1995 5.

Karkouti K, Callum J, Crowther MA, et al.: The relationship between

fibrinogen levels after cardiopulmonary bypass and large volume red cell transfusion

in

cardiac

surgery:

an 13

observational

study.

Anesth

Analg

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

117:14-22,2013 6.

Collins PW, Solomon C, Sutor K, et al.: Theoretical modelling of fibrinogen

supplementation

with

therapeutic

plasma,

cryoprecipitate,

or

fibrinogen

concentrate. Br J Anaesth 113:585-595,2014 Bolliger D, Szlam F, Molinaro RJ, et al.: Finding the optimal concentration

CR IP T

7.

range for fibrinogen replacement after severe haemodilution: an in vitro model. Br J Anaesth 102:793-799,2009 8.

Solomon C, Pichlmaier U, Schoechl H, et al.: Recovery of fibrinogen after

AN US

administration of fibrinogen concentrate to patients with severe bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Br J Anaesth 104:555-562,2010 9.

Rahe-Meyer N, Solomon C, Hanke A, et al.: Effects of fibrinogen

M

concentrate as first-line therapy during major aortic replacement surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology 118:40-50,2013 Ranucci

M,

Baryshnikova

ED

10.

E,

Crapelli

GB,

et

al.:

Randomized,

double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of fibrinogen concentrate supplementation

Rahe-Meyer N, Levy JH, Mazer CD, et al.: Randomized evaluation of

CE

11.

PT

after complex cardiac surgery. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e002066,2015

fibrinogen vs placebo in complex cardiovascular surgery (REPLACE): a double-blind

AC

phase III study of haemostatic therapy. Br J Anaesth 117:41-51,2016 12.

Bilecen S, de Groot JA, Kalkman CJ, et al.: Effect of Fibrinogen

Concentrate on Intraoperative Blood Loss Among Patients With Intraoperative Bleeding During High-Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 317:738-747,2017 13.

Wilhelmsen L, Svardsudd K, Korsan-Bengtsen K, et al.: Fibrinogen as a 14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 311:501-505,1984 14.

van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR: High levels of fibrinogen are

associated with the risk of deep venous thrombosis mainly in the elderly. J Thromb Haemost 1:2677-2678,2003 Okita Y, Miyata H, Motomura N, et al.: A study of brain protection during

CR IP T

15.

total arch replacement comparing antegrade cerebral perfusion versus hypothermic circulatory arrest, with or without retrograde cerebral perfusion: analysis based on the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

16.

AN US

149:S65-73,2015

Austin PC: The use of propensity score methods with survival or

time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in

17.

M

randomized experiments. Stat Med 33:1242-1258,2014

Fassl J, Lurati Buse G, Filipovic M, et al.: Perioperative administration of

ED

fibrinogen does not increase adverse cardiac and thromboembolic events after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 114:225-234,2015 Bellomo R, Warrillow SJ, Reade MC: Why we should be wary of

PT

18.

AC

CE

single-center trials. Crit Care Med 37:3114-3119,2009

15

AC

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient enrollment

Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics in the Unmatched and Propensity-Matched 16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Groups Unmatched Groups Fib/Cryo

No

Standardi

Fib/Cryo

No

Standardi

administr

Fib/Cryo

zed

administr

Fib/Cryo

zed

ation

administr

Differenc

ation

administr

Differenc

(n=247)

ation

es, %

(n=191)

ation

es, %

(n=713)

(n=191)

CR IP T

variable

Matched Groups

Age (year)

67 (58-75)

69 (59-77)

-1.8

67 (59-76)

69 (60-77)

-2.7

Gender (%

163 (66.0)

487 (68.3)

-4.9

128 (67.0)

126 (66.0)

2.2

Height

163

164

-7.9

164

162

6.7

(cm)

(156-169)

(157-171)

Weight (kg)

60.3

61.6

(51-69)

(53-70)

124 (50.2)

345 (48.4)

64 (25.9)

185 (25.9)

177 (71.7)

535 (75.0)

27 (10.9)

males)

91 (47.6)

86 (45.0)

4.8

-0.1

46 (24.1)

51 (26.7)

-6.0

-7.6

136 (71.2)

129 (67.5)

8.0

77 (10.8)

0.4

19 (9.9)

22 (11.5)

-5.1

27 (10.9)

62 (8.7)

7.5

21 (11.0)

23 (12.0)

-3.3

2 (0.8)

5 (0.7)

1.3

4 (2.1)

2 (1.0)

8.4

28 (11.3)

61 (8.6)

9.3

24 (12.6)

23 (12.0)

1.6

8 (3.2)

14 (2.0)

8.0

6 (3.1)

5 (2.6)

3.1

19 (7.7)

62 (8.7)

-3.7

12 (6.3)

17 (8.9)

9.8

failure (%) Liver

M

ED

CE

dysfunctio

PT

(%) Renal

2.9

3.6

on (%) Diabetes

58.9

(51.5-67.0)

emia (%) Hypertensi

60.4

(52.0-69.5)

(%) Hyperlipid

(156-170)

AN US

Smoking

-10.5

(157-170)

n (%)

AC

Cerebrovas cular

accident (%)

Preoperati ve resuscitati on (%) COPD

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

moderate to

severe 30 (12.1)

76 (10.7)

4.7

21 (11.0)

16 (8.4)

8.9

13 (5.3)

26 (3.6)

7.8

7 (3.7)

5 (2.6)

6.0

11 (4.4)

8 (1.1)

20.3

6 (3.1)

4 (2.1)

6.6

66 (26.7)

109 (15.3)

28.3

46 (24.1)

40 (20.9)

7.5

CCS (II-IV)

12 (4.9)

21 (2.9)

9.9

8 (4.2)

8 (4.2)

0

NYHA

182 (73.4)

437 (61.3)

26.7

137 (71.7)

133 (69.6)

4.6

good

182 (73.7)

M

(%) Peripheral

518 (72.7)

2.3

141 (73.8)

143 (74.9)

-2.4

moderate

60 (24.3)

185 (25.9)

-3.8

46 (24.1)

45 (23.6)

1.2

poor

5 (2.0)

10 (1.4)

4.8

4 (2.1)

3 (1.6)

3.9

Duration of

497

412

54.6

473

434

4.0

operation

(390-630)

(349-502)

(381-573)

(372-547)

Duration of

237

203

225

218

CPB (min)

(189-307)

(161-245)

(183-287)

(182-263)

Preoperati

9 (3.6)

25 (3.5)

0.7

7 (3.7)

7 (3.7)

0

elective

158 (64.0)

546 (76.6)

-27.9

127 (66.5)

112 (58.6)

16.3

urgent

20 (8.1)

41 (5.8)

9.3

10 (5.2)

20 (10.5)

-19.6

emergent

66 (26.7)

123 (17.3)

23.0

52 (27.2)

57 (29.8)

-5.7

salvage

3 (1.2)

3 (0.4)

8.8

2 (1.0)

2 (1.0)

0

vascular Old myocardial infarction (%) Congestive failure (%) Reoperatio n (%)

(II-IV)

AC

PT

CE

(min)

ED

LV function

ve

AN US

heart

CR IP T

disease (%)

54.9

9.4

shock

(%)

Urgency

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Arrhythmi

24 (9.7)

65 (9.1)

2.1

18 (9.4)

17 (8.9)

1.8

Lowest

24.5(22.1-

25.0

-18.2

24.5

24.0

-2.9

core

26.4)

(22.0-28.0)

(22.0-26.6)

(21.2-26.7)

a (%)

temperatur Type of cardiac surgery

CR IP T

e (˚C) Root

50 (20.2)

161 (22.6)

-5.7

38 (19.9)

34 (17.8)

5.4

arch

134 (54.3)

410 (57.5)

-6.6

102 (53.4)

118 (61.8)

-17.0

thoracic

51 (20.6)

120 (16.8)

9.8

43 (22.5)

29 (15.2)

18.8

combined

12 (4.9)

22 (3.1)

9.1

8 (4.2)

10 (5.2)

-4.9

NCVC

103 (41.7)

336 (47.1)

-10.9

99 (51.8)

65 (34.0)

36.6

Keio

0 (0)

198 (27.8)

-87.7

0 (0)

37 (19.4)

-69.3

30 (12.1)

135 (18.9)

-18.8

25 (13.1)

60 (31.4)

-45.2

114 (46.2)

44 (6.2)

67 (35.1)

29 (15.2)

-47.1

University Kobe University Nagoya

102.1

ED

Hospital

M

Hospital

AN US

Hospital

University Hospital

PT

Numerical data are presented as medians (1st quartile–3rd quartile). Categorical data are presented as number (%). Abbreviations: Fib, fibrinogen concentrate; Cryo, cryoprecipitate; COPD, chronic

CE

obstructive pulmonary disease; CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional classification; NYHA, New York Heart Association; NCVC, National Cerebral

AC

Cardiovascular Center

Table 2. Postoperative outcome parameters in the propensity-score-matched groups 19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

characteristic Thrombosis

Fibrinogen/cryoprecipitate

No Fibrinogen/cryoprecipitate

P

group (n=191)

group(n=191)

27 (14.1)

28 (14.7)

0.884

6 (3.1)

10 (5.2)

0.307

(%) 30-day mortality (%)

CR IP T

Categorical data are presented as number (%).

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients' thrombosis events in the intensive care units Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR

95% CI

Fibrinogen/

1.65

1.08-2.52

0.021

95% CI

P

1.22

0.76-1.95

0.408

1.10

0.95-1.27

0.192

1.12

0.95-1.32

0.188

Gender (male)

1.55

0.97-2.46

0.064

1.22

0.71-2.07

0.474

Smoking (missing 1)

1.59

1.06-2.40

0.026

1.26

0.78-2.03

0.342

DM

1.66

0.95-2.91

0.075

1.37

0.74-2.53

0.323

Carotid vessel disease

2.29

1.31-4.00

0.004

2.25

1.24-4.07

0.008

1.76

0.94-3.30

0.078

1.37

0.70-2.70

0.362

1.51

0.88-2.59

0.139

1.20

0.66-2.18

0.560

1.75

0.76-4.02

0.190

1.03

0.40-2.68

0.955

1.39

0.86-2.24

0.178

1.02

0.59-1.78

0.943

1.14

1.07-1.22

<0.001

1.17

1.05-1.29

0.003

1.19

1.06-1.35

0.004

0.99

0.78-1.14

0.559

cryoprecipitate use Age (per 10 years

PT

Peripheral vascular

ED

severe

M

increase)

COPD moderate to

P

OR

AN US

covariates

disease (missing 51)

CE

Old myocardial

infarction (missing 2)

AC

Reoperation

Duration of operation (per 1 hour increase) Duration of CPB (per 1 hour increase) (missing 77)

Type of cardiac surgery (missing 31) Root

1

1

(reference)

(reference) 20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Arch

1.00

0.60-1.67

0.999

0.76

0.44-1.30

0.307

Thoracic

0.86

0.44-1.68

0.660

0.57

0.27-1.21

0.142

Combined

2.80

1.14-6.90

0.025

1.75

0.68-4.54

0.249

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; missing (n),

AC

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

missing data for the number of patients (n)

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 30-day mortality Multivariate analysis

OR

95% CI

P

OR

95% CI

P

Fibrinogen/

1.11

0.52-2.33

0.794

0.44

0.18-1.12

0.081

1.22

0.94-1.58

0.133

1.42

1.03-1.95

0.03

Renal failure

2.09

0.84-0.18

0.109

2.02

0.71-3.35

0.16

Carotid vessel

2.59

1.10-6.11

0.029

2.08

0.74-5.45

0.17

16.6

6.3-43.9

<0.001

13.0

3.59-47.3

<0.001

2.51

1.01-6.24

0.047

2.54

0.90-7.16

0.08

1.23

<0.001

1.20

1.02-1.43

0.02

<0.001

1.23

0.91-1.65

0.17

CR IP T

covariates

M

Univariate analysis

cryoprecipitate use Age (per 10 years

AN US

increase)

disease Resuscitation (missing 1) COPD moderate to severe Duration of

ED

operation (per 1 hour increase) (per 1 hour

1.38

1.17-1.63

PT

Duration of CPB

1.13-1.34

77)

CE

increase) (missing Urgency

AC

elective

1

1

(reference)

(reference)

Urgent

1.05

0.24-4.59

0.946

0.67

0.11-4.12

0.66

Emergent

2.16

1.02-4.59

0.045

1.25

0.77-2.05

0.65

Salvage

18.7

3.23-108.0

<0.001

1.59

0.17-14.7

0.68

0.16-0.96

0.04

Type of cardiac surgery (missing 31) Root Arch

1

1

(reference)

(reference)

0.51

0.22-1.14 22

0.102

0.39

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Thoracic

0.84

0.36-2.31

0.839

0.81

0.26-2.56

0.72

Combined

1.26

0.27-5.93

0.774

0.77

0.33-1.81

0.76

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; P, p-value; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; missing (n), missing data for the number of

AC

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

patients (n)

23