Safety of Thoracentesis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Safety of Thoracentesis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

lymphocytes, they may lack the destructive immune response necessary to cause clinically significant pneumonitis. None of these considerations provide...

304KB Sizes 109 Downloads 125 Views

lymphocytes, they may lack the destructive immune response necessary to cause clinically significant pneumonitis. None of these considerations provide an explanation for the development ofCMV pneumonitis, or the unusual mode of its presentation, in our patient. Nevertheless, this case and its management identifies CMV as a potential cause of pulmonary nodules in AIDS and emphasizes that CMV rarely may cause clinically significant lung disease. In such cases, specific antiviral therapy may be of benefit. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors thank Nadine Lurie for editorial assistance.

REFERENCES 1 Meyers JD, Flournoy N, Thomas ED. Nonbacterial pneumonia 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 9

10

after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a review of ten years' experience. Rev Infect Dis 1992; 4:1119-32 Jacobson MA, Mills J. Serious cytomegalovirus disease in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108:585-94 Stover DE, White DA, Romano PA, Gellene RA, Robeson WA. Spectrum of pulmonary diseases associated with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Med 1985; 78:429-37 Wallace JM, Hannah J. Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in patients with AIDS: findings in an autopsy series. Chest 1987; 82:198203 McKenzie R, Travis WD, Dolan SA, Pittaluga S, Feuerstein 1M, Shelhamer J, et ale The causes of death in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a clinical and pathologic study with emphasis on the role of pulmonary disease. Medicine 1991; 70:326-43 Jacobson MA, Mills J, Rush J, Peiperl L, Seru ~ Mohanty PIC, et ale Morbidity and mortality of patients with AIDS and firstepisode Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia unaffected by concomitant pulmonary cytomegalovirus infection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144:6-9 Bozzette SA, Arcia J, Bartok AE, McGlynn LM, McCutchan )A, Richman DO, et ale Impact of Pneumocystis carini; and cytomegalovirus on the course and outcome of atypical pneumonia in advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Infect Dis 1992; 165:93-8 Miles PA, Baughman ~ Linnemann CC. Cytomegalovirus in the bronchoalveolar lavage 8uid of patients with AIDS. Chest 1990; 97:1072-76 Millar AB, Patou G, Miller RF, Grundy JE, Katz DR, Weller ~ et ale Cytomegalovirus in the lungs of patients with AIDS. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141:1474-77 Grundy JE, Shanley JD, Griffiths PD. Is cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in transplant patients an immunopathologic condition? Lancet 1987; 2:996-99

Safety of Thoracentesis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients· Jeffrey f McCartney, M.D.; ]ames W Adams II, M.D., and lbtrlck B. Hazard, M.D., F.C.C.~

F.C.C.~;

As practicing inteosivists, we frequently diagnose pleural effusions in mechanically ventilated patients and routinely perform thoracentesis even when the patient is on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In light or a recent report, *From the Baptist Memorial Hospital-Medical Center, Memphis, Tenn. Reprint requem: Dr. McCartney, Memphis Critical Care Associates, 920 Madison Avenue, Suite 822, Memphis 38103

1820

we have reviewed our experience. It is or interest that aU thoracenteses were performed with patients in the lateral (Chat 1993; 103:1920-21) decubitus position.

S

afety and effectiveness of diagnostic thoracentesis is well established.' This procedure is generally considered safe following routine preparation and techniques. The importance of properly diagnosing pleural effusions and their underlying causes should be equivalent in patients with or without mechanical ventilation. Unfortunately, the safety of thoracentesis in mechanically ventilated patients is poorly addressed in the current medical literature. We have not hesitated to perform diagnostic thoracentesis in patients on mechanical ventilators and report our experience herein. We use the lateral decubitus position in all patients and believe that our rate of complications is equivalent to that of patients not receiving mechanical ventilation. METHOD

Over a 26-month period, from July 1989 to September 1991, 31 thoracenteses were performed on 26 mechanically ventilated patients. Any patient who underwent the procedure during this time was included in the study Patient ages ranged from 19 to 92 years. All thoracenteses were performed by one of two board-eertified critical care physicians or residents and fellows under staff supervision. The effusions were initially found by clinical examination or chest radiograph and most were confirmed by a lateral decubitus chest radiograph or ultrasonography. Each of the thoracenteses was performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the side to be "tapped" in the downward position. In order to prevent the patient from sinking into the bed, each patient was placed on a firm surface, such as a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) board. As the patients were already receiving mechanical ventilation, sedation or paralysis was used as needed on an individual patient basis to facilitate this positioning. After preparation in sterile fashion with iodophor solution, the site to be punctured was determined by ultrasound localization, the area of maximal dullness by percussion, or a location just inferior to the scapular tip. Local anesthesia with 1 percent lidocaine was used. The same No. 21gauge needle used for anesthesia was then used to puncture the pleural space and confirm the presence of the 8uid. This injection of anesthetic agent and puncture of the pleural space was carried out with the needle and syringe kept perpendicular to the skin surface. This was done to ensure entry into the pleural space and not continued movement of the needle merely within the subcutaneous tissues. If 8uid was not encountered, the syringe was withdrawn and anesthetic agent was administered at another location. This was usually in a more lateral direction. Fluid was encountered with the small needle in all cases before proceeding. The needle and syringe used for anesthesia were removed, and further penetration for pleural 8uid removal was then achieved with a disposable thoracentesis catheter-over-needle assembly. Amounts of 8uid removed were determined according to the indication for thoracentesis. After the procedure, the needle was removed and a bandage was placed over the puncture site. The CPR board was then removed and the patient returned to the supine position. Portable chest roentgenograms were then obtained in all patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Flo., and tidal volume were not adjusted. Respiratory rates were increased in patients who received paralytic agents. Absence of pneumothorax was confirmed by the follow-up chest radiograph. Chest radiographs were reviewed by the staff critical care physician soon after the procedure and followed up by routine radiology interpretation later.

Safety of ThoI8C8nteS18 in MechanicaJIy Ventilated Patients (McCartne~

Adems,Hazard)

RESULTS

Of the 31 thoracenteses, 25 were performed with the patient on PEEP from 5 to 20 em HIO. At least five of the patients had known prior chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Volumes extracted ranged from 50 ml to 1,500 ml. Four chest tubes were required out ofthe 31 thoracenteses. One was employed for a complicated parapneumonic effusion characterized by a pH less than 7.20. Two chest tubes were placed after follow-up chest radiographs revealed pneumothoraces. In the fourth patient, an intrapleural catheter with one-way valve was placed for pneumothorax. In no thoracentesis did the patient experience significant bleeding (requiring transfusion) or acquire a site infection (defined as pus at site, inflammation at site, or need for antibiotics). There were no deaths associated with the procedure. DISCUSSION

Thoracentesis, while not without hazard, is a safe and valuable aid in the diagnosis of causes of pleural effusions.s-s While the guidelines for thoracentesis in nonmechanically ventilated patients are well established, there are few data indicating the safety of this procedure in mechanically ventilated patients.3-5 Although pneumothorax is a greatly feared complication of thoracentesis, especially in mechanically ventilated patients on PEE~ we encountered only three pneumothoraces in our series of 31 procedures. As one series of ventilated patients reported up to 38 percent incidence of spontaneous pneumothorax," this incidence of pneumothorax is not excessive. This experience is also consistent with the incidence of pneumothorax after thoracentesis in nonventilated patients. I.. Each was found by routine radiograph and there was no evidence of tension at the time of diagnosis. The lateral decubitus position is not effective in preventing pneumothorax in needle lung biopsy 7 However, we believe that the use of the described technique using the lateral decubitus position with the patient on a firm surface,

adequate sedation or paralysis, and careful puncture of the pleural space with a small needle confirming the presence of Huidmake thoracentesis a safe procedure in mechanicially ventilated patients. Further benefits to the lateral decubitus position also arise. Once the patient is rolled over onto his side it is much easier to hold the sedated patient than in a sitting position. Also, ventilator tubing and endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes are more simply managed and hopefully less likely to be pulled out in the decubitus position. CONCLUSION

Pleural effusion is not an uncommon occurrence in mechanically ventilated patients and generally requires thoracentesis for the complete diagnostic and therapeutic approach. We believe that the described technique using the lateral decubitus position makes this a safe procedure even in mechanically ventilated patients on PEE~ ACKNOWLEDGMENT: We wish to thank our staff at Memphis Critical Care Associates for their invaluable assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

REFERENCES 1 Godwin JE, Sahn SA. Thoracentesis: a safe procedure in mechanically ventilated patients. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:800-02 2 CoUinsTR, Sabn SA.Thoracentesis: clinical value, complications, technical problems, and patient experience. Chest 1987; 91:81722

3 Sokolowski ~ Burgher L~ Jones FL, Patterson JR, Selecky PAtGuidelines for thoracentesis and needle biopsy of the pleura. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140:257-58 4 Seneff MG, Corwin ~ Gold LH, Irwin RS. Complications associated with thoracentesis. Chest 1986; 90:97-100 5 Sahn SA. The pleura. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138:184-234 6 DeLatorre FJ, Tomasa A, Klamburg J, Leon C, Soler M, Ruis J, et ale Incidence of pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in patients with aspiration pneumonia requiring ventilatory support. Chest 1977; 72:141-44 7 Berger R, Smith D. Efficiency of the lateral decubitus position in preventing pneumothorax after needle biopsy of the lung. South Moo J 1988;81:1140-43

CHEST I 103 I 6 I JUNE, 1993

1921