SC19.04 Endobronchial Palliation in Thoracic Malignancies

SC19.04 Endobronchial Palliation in Thoracic Malignancies

S122 be repeated with ease and have been used for mediastinal restaging in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy in preparation for definitive su...

114KB Sizes 1 Downloads 39 Views

S122

be repeated with ease and have been used for mediastinal restaging in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy in preparation for definitive surgical intervention. Ultrasound image analysis of lymph nodes may assist bronchoscopists during EBUS-TBNA or EUS-FNA. Standard sonographic classification of lymph nodes can help characterize mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes as benign or malignant, which may guide the decision on which lymph nodes to sample. Newer imaging technology such as elastography can potentially enhance US guided image analysis of the lymph nodes.

SC19.04 Endobronchial Palliation in Thoracic Malignancies Zsolt Pápai-Székely Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Szent György University Teaching Hospital of Fejér County, Székesfehérvár/Hungary Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women; in men prostate cancer, while in women breast cancer is more common. About 14% of all new cancers are lung cancers. The American Cancer Society’s estimates for lung cancer in the United States for 2016 are: About 224,390 new cases of lung cancer (117,920 in men and 106,470 in women) About 158,080 deaths from lung cancer (85,920 in men and 72,160 in women) Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women; about 1 out of 4 cancer deaths are from lung cancer. Each year, more people die of lung cancer than of colon, breast, and prostate cancers combined. One third of the new lung cancer cases are candidates for surgery, and about half of the rest develops some kind of major airways involvement. This can be endobronchial tumor, extrinsic compression or combined. Besides lung cancer, metastases from other types of tumors are also candidates for intrabronchial treatments. There are different methods available for treating endobronchial malignancies, in most of the cases the combination of two or more procedure needed to reach optimal result. To reestablish the airway patency improves quality of life, and provides sufficient time to apply different lung cancer treatment, chemo, radio and immunotherapy Methods available include mechanical debulking, use of different types of laser, electrocautery, cryotherapy, intraluminal brachytherapy, argon-plasma coagulation, and microwave instruments. Different types of silicon and self-expandable metallic stents are useful for keeping the airways open after successful reopening. Balloon dilatation may help to insert stent to the compressed airways. The use of locally installed substances like chemo, different

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Vol. 12 No. 1S

angiogenesis inhibitors are in the focus again. With the use of endobronchial ultrasound the needle can easily be inserted into the peripheral or central tumor, and lymph nodes. Most of the procedures are done under general anesthesia, with the use of rigid bronchoscope. Ideally the bronchoscopist can choose from the different methods available, using the best appropriate one in the given situation. Sufficient training is necessary before starting each new method. Simulation, low fidelity models are available to learn without having the unnecessary risk in a real case. One has to be prepared for treating different complications, such as heavy bleeding from the tumor, or bleeding caused by the procedure itself. Well trained personnel are a must to start with these kinds of procedures. Anesthesiologist, assistants trained in endoscopic procedures are essential before starting the procedure. Keywords: lung cancer, bronchoscopy, palliation

SC20.01 Muscle-Sparing Thoracotomy: Can It Still Be Considered a Standard? Clemens Aigner Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik University Clinic Essen, Essen/Germany Muscle sparing thoracotomy has been a standard approach in thoracic surgery for a long time. Minimal invasive approaches have gained a widespread acceptance recently and were included in the treatment guidelines for early stage NSCLC by several societies. Prospective randomized trials comparing minimal invasive approaches versus muscle sparing thoracotomy in stage I NSCLC have already been performed more than twenty years ago and demonstrated equal morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless it took until 2013 that the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommended a VATS approach for clinical stage I NSCLC over a thoracotomy in experienced centers.1 No recommendation is made for more advanced stages. When analyzing national registry data still a high percentage of procedures in performed in an open way. This means that in current practice thoracotomy is still used as a standard approach by many surgeons. Minimal invasive approaches e both videothoracoscopic and robotic e are not different operations but different approaches towards performing an operation. It has been proven in several studies that in early stage lung cancer minimal invasive approaches in its various form lead at least to equivalent or even better oncologic outcome compared to an open approach. Nevertheless in more advanced stages this proof is lacking. Experienced centers reported individual series of minimal invasive approaches