Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wollo, Ethiopia

Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wollo, Ethiopia

Accepted Manuscript Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wol...

418KB Sizes 1 Downloads 65 Views

Accepted Manuscript Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wollo, Ethiopia Million Tsegaw, Gashaw Andargie, Getnet Alem, Minale Tareke PII:

S0022-3956(16)30537-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.016

Reference:

PIAT 2993

To appear in:

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Received Date: 21 June 2016 Revised Date:

15 October 2016

Accepted Date: 20 October 2016

Please cite this article as: Tsegaw M, Andargie G, Alem G, Tareke M, Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wollo, Ethiopia, Journal of Psychiatric Research (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Screening HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) among HIV positive

2

patients attending antiretroviral therapy in South Wollo, Ethiopia

RI PT

3

Million Tsegaw 1, Gashaw Andargie2, Getnet Alem3, *Minale Tareke4

5

1

Department of Psychiatry, Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, Ethiopia

6

2

Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar,

7

Gondar, Ethiopia

8

3

9

Ethiopia. 4

Research and Training directorate, Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa,

M AN U

10

SC

4

Bahir Dar University, College of Medicine and Health science, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia,

11

* Corresponding author

13

P.O. Box +251 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

14

TE D

12

Email addresses: [email protected], [email protected] ,[email protected],

16

[email protected]

18 19 20

AC C

17

EP

15

21 22 23

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

25

Background: The vast majority of people living with HIV/AIDS reside in low and middle

26

income countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Despite the huge

27

number of service users in the local area, cognitive disorder among HIV patients has not been

28

extensively studied and there is a dearth of knowledge on the subject. The objective of this study

29

was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder

30

among people living with HIV/AIDS in antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics. Methods:

31

Institution based cross sectional study was conducted from April to May, 2015 at Dessie Referral

32

Hospital & Kombolcha Health Center. International HIV Dementia Scale was used to screen

33

HIV associated neurocognitive deficits. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess

34

predictors of neurocognitive disorders. Result: The risk of HIV associated neurocognitive

35

disorder was 36.4%. Those who had CD4 count of 500 cells/dl or less (AOR =2.368(1.524,

36

3.680)), no formal education (AOR =4.287(2.619, 7.016)), poor medication adherence (AOR =

37

1.487(1.010, 2.180)) and older age (AOR =3.309(1.259, 8.701)) were found to be significantly

38

associated with HIV associated neurocognitive disorders. Conclusion: The risk of HIV-

39

associated neurocognitive disorder was found to be high among people living with HIV/AIDS.

40

This emphasizes the need of regular cognitive screening for early identification and appropriate

41

intervention.

43

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

42

RI PT

24

Key words: HIV, people living with HIV/AIDS, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder

44 45 46 47 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

48

Introduction

49

Global statistics estimated that 35 million people were living with Human Immunodeficiency

51

Virus/Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) in 2013, of which 24.7 million live

52

in Sub-Sahara Africa/resource limited settings/ where little HIV neurology research is conducted

53

(Meyer AC, 2014).

54

In Ethiopia, according to 2007 single point estimate, about 1.12 million people were living with

55

HIV in 2009, of which 336,160 were eligible for Highly Active Anti-retroviral Therapy

56

(HAART). There were an estimated of 131145 new infections and 44751 AIDS related

57

deaths(Hapco, 2010).

58

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can cause a spectrum of neuropsychological

59

impairment known collectively as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND).Though the

60

incidence of HIV-associated dementia has reduced in the HAART era; the prevalence of milder

61

forms of HAND has increased(Cross et al., 2013a, Nabha et al., 2013, Woods et al., 2009).

62

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) is used to describe a spectrum of disorders

63

that range from asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment to minor neurocognitive disorder to

64

clinically severe dementia. The most severe form HIV-associated dementia also referred to as the

65

AIDS dementia complex or HIV encephalopathy is considered an AIDS-defining illness(Fauci et

66

al., 2015).

67

HAND is characterized by impaired cognitive functioning and reduced mental activity that

68

interferes with work, domestic and social functioning. HAND and HIV/AIDS have complex and

69

bidirectional relationship, with reported neurocognitive impairment/cognitive deficits up to 99%

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

50

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

in symptomatic patients and 33% in non-symptomatic cases. This dramatic impact of HIV/AIDS

71

left untreated; leading to decreased patient’s quality of life, reduced ability to perform daily

72

activities, poor medication adherence and shorter survival time(Larsson et al., 2009, Breuer et

73

al., 2011).

74

A population-based longitudinal cohort study conducted to determine the risk factors of HAND

75

among HIV-infected patients revealed that increased age, increased length of survival with

76

diagnose of HIV-1infection, low Cluster of Differentiation(CD4) cell counts, and high viral load

77

(>100,000copies/ml) had strong association with HAND(McCombe et al., 2013).

78

There are limited studies which showed the magnitude of HIV associated neurocognitive

79

disorders and associated factors among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) in Sub-Saharan

80

region(Nakku et al., 2013), particularly in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to determine the

81

magnitude and associated factors of HAND among PLHA. Hence, the findings might have

82

importance to stakeholders and policy makers working in neuro- psychiatric areas by showing its

83

prevalence and the factors associated with it.

84

METHODS

85

Study Settings and Population

86

A cross sectional study was conducted at Dessie Referral Hospital (DRH) and Kombolcha

87

Health Center (KHC) HIV care clinic. Dessie is located in South Wollo administrative zone,

88

Amhara, National Regional state, North East Ethiopia. Dessie is the capital town of South Wollo

89

zone, which is located 401 km Northeast of Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia). The town

90

has an estimated population of 279,423(2012) and has one public referral hospital, three general

91

private hospitals, and four government health centers, all are providing antiretroviral therapy

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

70

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(ART) services. Dessie Referral Hospital is the only referral hospital which serves for more than

93

five million people of the South Wollo zone and neighboring zones. Dessie Referral Hospital and

94

Kombolcha Health Center give service on average for 5100 and 3000 attendants monthly with

95

four delivery units, respectively.

96

The study population was PLHA aged between 18 to 65 years who had treatment follow up at

97

DRH and KHC ART clinic during study period. Those with severe medical illness related

98

/unrelated to HIV disease at the time of data collection, severe psychiatric disorders (e.g.,

99

schizophrenia), intellectual disability and physical disabilities (upper limb amputation/defect)

M AN U

SC

RI PT

92

were excluded from the study.

101

Sample size and Sampling procedures

102

The sample size was calculated using the formula [n = ((zα/2)2 p (1-p))/ d2] for estimating a

103

single population proportion at 95% confidence interval (CI) (Zα/2 = 1.96), 5% margin of error.

104

Proportion of population living with HIV and who had HAND was taken as 38%,(Lawler et al.,

105

2010a) and by adding 10% contingency for non response rate, a total of 595 study populations

106

were involved.

107

Data Collection and quality control

108

A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics and

109

clinical factors of HIV/AIDS. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) was used as a

110

screening tool to identify individuals who are at risk of HAND. The presence of HAND was

111

screened by the sum of a 3 item IHDS score of ≤9.5 in this study.

AC C

EP

TE D

100

112

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

113

The IHDS consists of three subtests:

114

A. Timed finger tapping test:  The number of finger taps of the first two fingers of the non-dominant hand is measured

116

by instructing the participant to open and close the fingers as widely and as quickly as

117

possible over a 5-second period.

RI PT

115

The finger tapping test is scored as follows :( 4 = 15 in 5 seconds, 3 = 11-14 in 5 seconds,

119

2 = 7-10 in 5 seconds, 1= 3-6 in 5 seconds, 0= 0-2 in 5 seconds)

SC

118

B. The alternating hand sequence test: Individual was asked to perform the following

121

movement with the non-dominant hand as quickly as possible over a 10s period;

M AN U

120

122

 clench the hand in a fist on a flat surface;

123

 put the hand flat on the surface with the palm down; and

124

 Put the hand perpendicular to the flat surface on the side of the fifth digit. The three hand positions are demonstrated to the participant by the examiner, and the participant

126

was allowed to perform the sequence correctly twice for practice before the 10 second subtest is

127

performed. The number of sequences correctly performed within 10seconds up to a maximum

128

number of 4 is scored. A participant unable to perform the alternating hand sequence was

129

assigned a score of 0.

130

C. The verbal recall subset (Registration):

131

Registration (new learning) was also measured by reciting four words to the subject and then

132

asking him/her to repeat them immediately. The words are repeated by the examiner until the

133

subject can repeat all four words correctly. The subject was asked to recall the four words after

134

the timed finger tapping and alternating hand sequence tests.

AC C

EP

TE D

125

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The number of items recalled was scored out of 4. For words not recalled, the subject was

136

prompted with a ‘semantic’ clue as follows: Animal (dog), piece of clothing (hat), vegetable

137

(bean), and color (red).A half-point is assigned for each correct word recalled after prompting. A

138

total score out of 12 is calculated for each participant, with each of the three subtests contributing

139

4 points to the total score. Any participant with a score 9.5 or less was screened as risk for

140

HAND.

141

Adherence was assessed using Morsiky-8 item scale. The presence of poor adherence was

142

explained by sum of Morisky 8- item medication adherence scale score of 3-8.

143

Pre-coded and pre-tested Amharic version questionnaires were used to collect data by face to

144

face interviewing the participants. Three trained clinical nurses were recruited from Dessie

145

Health center for data collection and screening of people living with HIV/AIDS for HAND.

146

Data quality control issues were insured by conducting pre- test on 5% of the study participants.

147

Training was given for data collectors and supervisor on the questionnaire, how to screen HAND

148

using IHDS, the purpose of the study and how to approach respondents and obtain consent.

149

Filled questionnaires were checked daily for their completeness and consistency by the principal

150

investigator and supervisor.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

151

RI PT

135

152

Data management and analysis

153

The data was coded, checked, cleaned and entered into computers using software

154

epidemiological information (Epi- info) and then exported into statistical package for social

155

sciences (SPSS version 20) for analysis. The data was presented by mean, frequency, percentage

156

and odds ratio for different variables using descriptive statistics. Bivariate analysis was used to 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

assess the relationship between each independent variables and outcome variable. Variables that

158

met p-value < 0.2 were selected for further analysis using multivariate logistic regression

159

analysis in order to control confounding effects.

160

RI PT

157

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from University of Gondar and Amanuel Mental Specialized

162

Hospital. A formal letter of permission was obtained from Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital

163

and was submitted to Dessie Referral Hospital and Kombolcha Health Center. Each participant

164

was informed about the purpose of study. Confidentiality of respondents was maintained. An

165

informed consent was obtained from each respondent, following patient willingness data was

166

collected and any one not willing to take part in the study was not obliged at time of data

167

collection.

168

Results

169 170

Socio-demographic characteristics

171

Five hundred ninety three (593) people living with HIV/AIDS were involved in the study,

172

making the response rate of 99%. The mean age of the respondents were 38.6 ± 10.6 years.

173

Among the study participants 309(52.1%) were females and 377(63.6%) were married (table1).

174 175

HIV Associated Neurocognitive disorder (HAND)

176

Among the study participants who screened for HAND, 216(36.4%) of them had scored 9.5 or

177

less on IHDS. Procedural implementation of international HIV dementia scale (IHDS) was as

178

follows: The first measurement on IHDS was timed finger tapping, on this part motor speed was

179

assessed, 184(30.7%) were did very well scoring 4 out of 4. On the second part psychomotor

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

161

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

speed measurement was assessed, of whom 310 (52.3%) had performed the sequential procedure

181

scoring 4 out of 4.Thirdly, memory recall was assessed and was found as 368 (62.1%) had

182

recalled all the four items without any clue scoring 4 out of 4.

183 184

HAND and Clinical factors

185

Duration of being on HAART were also assessed, and was found that about 580(97.8%) had

186

been on HAART for more than 2 years (Table 2).

187 188

Factors associated with HAND

189

Bivariate and multivariate analysis showed that the association between HAND and age,

190

educational status, medication adherence and CD4 count were statistically significant. After

191

adjusting other variables(sex, ethnicity, religion, marital status, occupational status and clinical

192

factors like duration of taking HAART, clinical stage), the chance of having HAND among age

193

group 56-65(AOR=(3.309 CI(1.259,8.701)) was more likely as compared to age group 18-25

194

years. The multivariate analysis indicates that the risk of HAND was 3.3 times higher in those

195

participants having increased age.

196

This study also revealed that the likelihood of having the risk of HAND among PLHA was twice

197

in primarily educated participants (AOR= 2.005 CI (1.343, 2.994)) and/ or was around four times

198

in those who cannot read & write (AOR= 4.287 CI (2.619, 7.016)) as compared to those

199

educated secondary and above.

200

Participants who had poor medication adherence to ART, the odds of developing the risk of

201

HAND was 1.48 times higher (AOR = 1.487 CI (1.010, 2.180)). Similarly, having CD4 count of

RI PT

180

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

The clinical data reviewed during the time of study showed that 411 (69.3%) had HIV stage T1.

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

<= 500cells/µl were around twice more likely to have the risk of HAND (AOR =2.368 CI

203

(1.524, 3.680)) when compared to those with CD4 count of >500cells/µl (Table 3).

204 205

Discussion

206

In this study, the risk of HAND among people living with HIV/AIDS was 36.4% by using

207

international HIV dementia scale (IHDS) as screening tool and IHDS performance was greatly

208

influenced by increased age, no or low level of education, lower CD4 count and poor medication

209

adherence.

SC

RI PT

202

M AN U

210

The finding of this study was in line with the study done in Botswana (38%)(Chibanda et al.,

212

2014), in Thailand (37.5%) (Heaps et al., 2013), and in China (37.31%) (Zhang et al., 2012) were

213

found to have HAND. In all cases, the common predictors explained were older age, no or low

214

level of education, lower CD4 count and poor medication adherence.

215

However, the risk of HAND in the current study was higher than a cross-sectional study done in

216

Singapore (22.7%)(Chan et al., 2012), in Malawi (15%)(Kelly et al., 2014), in Cameroon

217

(21.1%) (Njamnshi

218

(24.8%)(Mossie TB et al., 2014).The differences might be accounted to the neurovirulence strain

219

differences, older age, being unable to read and write notified as a more powerful predictors.

220

On the other hand, this study was lower than study done in United State (52%), a prospective

221

cross-sectional study at Washington University Hospital (41%) (Cross et al., 2013b), in Uganda

222

(64.4%)(Nakku et al., 2013), and in Switzerland (83%) (Fasel et al., 2014). The discrepancy in

223

the prevalence rate might be accounted to the neurovirulence strain/clade/ differences, the

224

differences in the common predictors for the development of HAND as stated by lower CD4

TE D

211

AC C

EP

et al., 2008) ,and at Debre markos Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

count ,no or low level of education, and poor medication adherence. Other possible reasons for

226

the differences between the present study and other studies were mainly due to differences in the

227

method, using different cut-off points, consequences of unappreciated cultural nuances,

228

differences in the sample size used and certain environmental factors. The discrepancies might

229

also be explained from the difference in study population and demographic characteristics which

230

play a great role in the development of HAND

231

In this study, HAND was significantly associated with age group ranged 56-65 years which was

232

nearly consistent with the study done in Kenya and Botswana(Lawler et al., 2010b, Chibanda et

233

al., 2014).

234

Regarding educational level, being unable to read and write was significantly associated with

235

higher risk of developing HAND which was in line with the Sub-Saharan countries findings

236

(Breuer et al., 2011, Cross et al., 2013b).This might be because of better neuropsychological

237

test performance; better awareness about the chronic course of the illness and good follow-up

238

resulted in good medication (ART) adherence.

239

In the present study, there was statistically significant association between the clinical factors

240

like low CD4 count and poor medication adherence. This finding is supported by other studies,

241

as studies demonstrate that these factors, were the predictive variables in the development of

242

HAND in the setting where universal access to care and treatment available(McCombe et al.,

243

2013, Fasel et al., 2014).

244

Overall; the results of the present study provides additional information to assist with screening

245

of HAND to local area. The finding also gives key information about the impact of HAND on

246

socio-demographic variables, clinical and other related factors. Collectively, this work facilitates

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

225

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

efforts to understand the neurological complications of HIV infection, which remains a global

248

concern.

249

Strengths and limitations of this study

250

The strength of this study is the first on HAND in a representative sample in Ethiopia and used a

251

method of screening that is applicable to local clinical practice. Although we used standard

252

morsiky-8 item scale for assessing adherence, we didn’t measure plasma drug concentrations.

253

Even if International HIV Dementia Scale is suited for screening HAND in resource limited

254

settings or in low- and middle income countries independent of language and culture, it is not

255

validated in Ethiopia

SC

M AN U

256

RI PT

247

Conclusion

The risk of HAND was found to be high among PLHA at Dessie Referral Hospital and

258

Kombolcha Health Center. Increased age, no or low level of education, lower CD4 count and

259

poor medication adherence were significantly associated with HAND. Screening of HIV

260

associated Neurocognitive disorders for all PLHA should be done for early diagnosis and

261

treatment in order to decrease/delay/ neurocognitive dysfunctions. This finding will provide a

262

foundation for future neurocognitive studies and clinical neurocognitive outcomes in HIV

263

clinics. In order to improve the detection of patients with clinically significant HAND in study

264

area, future research should address the wider impact of HAND using cohort study.

265

References

266 267 268 269

BREUER , E., MYER , L., STRUTHERS , H. & JOSKA , J. A. 2011. HIV/AIDS and mental health research in subSaharan Africa: a systematic review. . African Journal of AIDS Research. , 10, 101-122. CHAN , L. G., KANDIAH, N. & CHUA, A. 2012. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in a South Asian population:contextual application of the 2007 criteria. . BMJ open.

AC C

EP

TE D

257

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

CHIBANDA, D., BENJAMIN , L., WEISS, H. A. & ABAS , M. 2014. Mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in people living with HIV/AIDS in low-and middle-income countries. JAIDS, 67, 554567. CROSS , H. M., COMBRINCK, M. I. & JOSKA, J. A. 2013a. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: Antiretroviral regimen, central nervous system penetration effectiveness, and cognitive outcomes. South African Medical Journal., 103, 758-762. CROSS , S., ÖNEN , N., GASE , A., OVERTON , E. T. & ANCES, B. M. 2013b. Identifying Risk Factors for HIVAssociated Neurocognitive Disorders Using the International HIV Dementia Scale. . J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 8, 1114-22. FASEL , D., KUNZE, U., ELZI , L., WERDER , V., NIEPMANN , S. & MONSCH , A. U. E. A. 2014. A short tool to screen HIV-infected patients for mild neurocognitive disorders-a pilot study. BMC Psychology, 2. FAUCI, K., LONGO, H. & LOSCALZO, J. 2015. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, United States, McGraw-Hill Education. HAPCO, F. 2010. Report on Progress towards Implementation of the UN Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS. AA: Federal ministry of health., 6-14. HEAPS, J., VALCOUR , V., CHALERMCHAI, T., PAUL, R., RATTANAMANEE, S. & SIANGPHOE , U., ET AL 2013. Development of normative neuropsychological performance inThailand for the assessment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol., 35, 1-8. KELLY , C. M., VAN OOSTERHOUT, J. J., NGWALO, C., STEWART, R. C. & BENJAMIN, L. E. A. 2014. HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) in Malawian Adults and Effect on Adherence to Combination Anti-Retroviral Therapy. PLoS ONE., 9. LARSSON , B. O., SÄLL, L., SALAMON, E. & ALLGULANDER, C. 2009. HIV infection and psychiatric illness. . Afr J Psychiatry, 12, 115-128. LAWLER, K., MOSEPELE, M., RATCLIFFE, S., SELOILWE, E., STEELE, K., NTHOBATSANG, R. & STEENHOFF, A. 2010a. Neurocognitive impairment among HIV-positive individuals in Botswana: a pilot study. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 13. LAWLER, K., MOSEPELE , M., RATCLIFFE , S., SELOILWE, E., STEELE, K. & NTHOBATSANG† R, E. A. 2010b. Neurocognitive impairment among HIV-positive individuals in Botswana: a pilot study. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 13. MCCOMBE, J. A., VIVITHANAPORN, P., GILL , M. & POWER , C. 2013. Predictors of symptomatic HIVassociated neurocognitive disorders in universal health care. . HIV medicine, 14, 99-107. MEYER AC 2014. Neurology and the Global HIV Epidemic. Semin Neurol, 34, 70-77. MOSSIE TB, KASSA AW & TEGEGNE MT 2014. HIV dementia among HIV positive people at Debre markos hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. . American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 2, 18-24. NABHA, L., DUONG, L. & TIMPONE , J. 2013. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: perspective on management strategies. . Drugs., 73, 893-905. NAKKU , J., KINYANDA , E. & HOSKINS , S. 2013. Prevalence and factors associated with probable HIV dementia in an African population : A cross-sectional study of an HIV / AIDS clinic population. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 126. NJAMNSHI , A. K., DJIENTCHEU VDE, P., FONSAH, J. Y., YEPNJIO, F. N., NJAMNSHI, D. M. & MUNA, W. E. 2008. The International HIV Dementia Scale is a useful screening tool for HIV-associated dementia/cognitive impairment in HIV-infected adults in Yaoundé-Cameroon. . J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 49, 393-7. WOODS , S. P., MOORE, D. J., WEBER , E. & GRANT, I. 2009. Cognitive neuropsychology of HIV-associated neurocognitive. disorders. . Neuropsychology review., 19, 152-168. ZHANG, Y., QIAO, L., DING , W., WEI , F., ZHAO, Q. & WANG, X. E. A. 2012. An initial screening for HIVassociated neurocognitive disorders of HIV-1 infected patients in China. . J Neurovirol. , 1-12.

AC C

270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

317

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

318

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Acknowledgements This study received financial support from University of Gondar and AMSH. We would like to thank Dessie Referral Hospital and Kombolcha health Center administrative and technical staffs

RI PT

for their indispensible co-operations before & during data collection. We are also grateful to the study participants without whom the current study would not have been realized. Finally, we

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

would like to thank Bahir Dar University for facility to write up in appropriate manner.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1: Distribution of PLHA by their socio-demographic characteristics, DRRH & KHC, ART clinic, July 2015(n= 593).

Male

Frequency 284

Age

Female 18-25

309 40

26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 Married Not married

237 167 82 67 377 216

Religion

Occupation

SC

40.0 28.2 13.8 11.3 63.6 36.4

No education Primary Secondary and above Orthodox Muslim Protestant Others Employed Unemployed

102 197 294 298 279 12 4 166 427

17.2 33.2 49.6 50.3 47.0 2.0 .7 28.0 72.0

Amhara Oromo Tigray Others

524 42 20 7

88.4 7.1 3.4 1.2

AC C

EP

Ethnicity

52.1 6.7

M AN U

Educational status

TE D

Marital status

Percent (%) 47.9

RI PT

Variables Sex

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2: Distribution of PLHA by their clinical status at DRH & KHC, ART clinic, July 2015 (n=593).

T1

Percent (%)

411

69.3

58 116 8

CD4 count(cell/dl)

<=500 >500

361 232

Duration of taking HAART

<= 2years > 2years

13 580

Treatment by regimen

First line Second line

9.8 19.6 1.3 60.9 39.1

M AN U

Stage I Stage II Stage III

RI PT

Clinical stage

Frequency

SC

Variables

562 31

2.2 97.8

94.8 5.2

TE D

Table 3: Bivarate and multivariate analysis to show the association between socio-demographic and clinical factors with HAND among PLHA in DRH & KHC ART clinic, 2015 Variables

HAND

Yes No

1.00

9

31

1.00

26-35

88

149

2.077(0.915, 4.715)

36-45

78

89

2.073(0.896, 4.792)

46-55

45

37

2.979(1.223,7.252)

56-65

41

26

4.375(1.759,10.880)

3.309(1.259,8.701)*

71

31

4.171(2.598,6.598)

4.287(2.619,7.016)*

81

116

2.039(1.385,3.001)

2.005(1.343,2.994)

Secondary &above >500cell/µl

109

185

1.00

1.00

44

123

1.00

1.00

<=500cell/µl

217

209

0.447(0.299,0.670)

2.368(1.524,3.680)*

AC C

Educational Unable to read &write status Primary

CD4 count

AOR(95%CI)

18-25

EP

Age

COR(95%CI)

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Medication

Good

70

152

1.00

1.00

adherence

Poor

191

180

1.771(1.239,2.533)

1.487(1.010,2.180)*

RI PT

Note: * =p<0.05, 1.00 = Reference, COR = Crude odd ratio at 95 % CI, AOR =Adjusted odd

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

ratio at 95 % CI.

3