Second messengers, the substantia gelatinosa and injury-induced persistent pain

Second messengers, the substantia gelatinosa and injury-induced persistent pain

PAIN Pain Supplement 6 (1999) X-S 12 Second messengers, the substantia gelatinosa and injury-induced persistent pain Karla R. Petersen-Zeitz”’ b, Al...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 59 Views

PAIN Pain Supplement

6 (1999) X-S 12

Second messengers, the substantia gelatinosa and injury-induced persistent pain Karla R. Petersen-Zeitz”’ b, Allan I. Basbauma* b.* “Departmenr.~ of Anatomy and Physiology. hW.M. Keck Foundation

Center,for

University of Cal(forrtia San Francisco.

Integrati\se Neuroscience,

Uniwr,ri@ of California

San Francisco,

San Francisco.

Box 0452.

CA 94143,

USA

San Francisco,

CA 94143,

USA

Abstract Although there is now unequivocal evidence that the circuitry within the substantia gelatinosa is a major contributor to the transmission and control of nociceptive messages, this was not known 35 years ago, when Pat Wall first focussed attention on this region. In addition to being the target of neurochemically distinct nociceptors, this region contains a heterogeneous population of excitatory and inhibitory interneurons. This review focuses on the contribution of second messenger systems that are found in the substantia gelatinosa. In particular the review highlights their critical contribution to the development of persistent pain conditions in the setting of tissue and nerve injury. Several of the studies used animals with deletions of genes that encode major second messenger molecules, including protein kinase A, C and nitric oxide synthase. Our laboratory has shown that mice with a deletion of the gene that encodes the gamma isoform of protein kinase C (which is almost exclusively expressed in a population of interneurons of the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa) have completely normal acute pain responses. However, the allodynia that characteristically develops after injury does not occur in these mice, particularly when it is generated by partial sciatic nerve injury. By contrast, deletion of genes that encode protein kinase A subunits only show deficits in the development of tissue inflammation-induced pain. These differences highlight the selectivity that characterizes the contribution of different second messenger molecules. Because of the restricted distribution of these molecules, it is likely that they are activated by different populations of primary afferent nociceptor and under very different conditions of injury. Understanding the circuitry within the substantia gelatinosa is thus critical to elucidating the mechanisms through which these second messenger molecules contribute to the development of

persistent pain in the setting of injury. 0 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. Kqwordst

Substantia

gelatinosa;

Second messenger

systems; Persistent pain conditions

1. Introduction Our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the transmission of nociceptive messages has changed considerably in the last 35 years, i.e. since the publication of the Gate Control Theory of Pain. For many of the intervening years, the emphasis was on the use of tract tracing and electrophysiological studies to identify the anatomy and physiology of the pathways through which information about acute noxious stimuli is transmitted from the spinal cord to the brainstem and thalamus. With a view to understanding the basis of pain conditions that were more clinically relevant, attention then turned to the long term consequences of injury, i.e. of maintained C-fiber input. Pat Wall’s studies were instrumental in focusing attention

* Corresponding 4845. E-mail address:

author.

Tel.:

[email protected]

+ l-415-476-5270; (AL Basbaum)

0304.3959/99/$20.00 0 1999 International PII: s0304-3959(99)00132-3

Association

fax: + l-415-4786-

on the mechanisms that regulate the flow of nociceptive information (Hillman and Wall, 1969) and on altered states of nociceptive processing that occur in the setting of injury (Cook et al., 1986), including increased spontaneous activity, lowered threshold, etc. In fact, a major rationale for proposing the Gate Control Theory (Melzack and Wall, 1965) was the recognition that clinically relevant pains cannot be explained by activity in a single class of afferent fiber. Rather, the activity of segmental and supraspinal modulatory systems are also critical determinants of the ultimate perception that is generated in the setting of injury. We could identify a host of areas that were influenced by Pat Wall’s remarkable insights into how the nervous system functions. In our view, however, Pat’s most important contribution to our present day understanding of the mechanisms through which nociceptive messages are processed derives from his early studies of the workings of the substantia gelatinosa. Most people who have read the Science paper describing Gate Control Theory will

for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V

recall Melzack and Wall’s critical discussion of the importance of the balance of large and small fibers to nociceptive processing. Readers remember the argument that pain is not just a function of the activity generated in C-fibers and they can readily discuss the emphasis that was placed on importance of large-fiber mediated inhibitory controls and on descending modulation. Perhaps because of our laboratory’s use of immunocytochemical and neurochemical approaches to dissect the circuits in the dorsal horn, it is our opinion that the focus of that paper on the workings of the substantia gelatinosa was particularly memorable. Indeed, based merely on its appearance in simple histological sections, Pat suggested that the substantia gelatinosa has a unique neurochemistry. How prescient can you get‘? Remember that 1965 was several years before immunocytochemistry was applied to the nervous system and before the demonstration that peptides are abundant in superficial dorsal horn of the spinal of the cord. The original ideas about the function of the substantia gelatinosa derived from Pat’s electrophysiological studies of the effects of small and large-fiber stimulation on the properties of dorsal horn neurons and on the propagation of dorsal root potentials (Wall, 1962; Mendell and Wall, 1964; Wall. 1967). Particular importance was placed on the contribution of presynaptic controls of primary afferent terminals via interneurons of the substantia gelatinosa (Wall, 1964). Today that concept is taken for granted, but it was remarkably controversial in the sixties, in part because of the paucity of anatomical evidence for presynaptic controls. At the conclusion of a talk describing his studies of the presynaptic controls that operate in the generation of positive and negative dorsal root potentials (Wall. 1964), Pat was confronted by Sir John Eccles who noted that ‘George Gray has informed me (i.e. Eccles) that he finds axo-axonic synapses to be very rare in the substantia gelatinosa’. Pat responded as only he can that ‘It is open season and the hunting is good with the electron microscope. You choose only to see synapses where the bubbles appear. but I can’t believe that there is only one type of anatomical synapse in the whole animal kingdom’. We’re not sure whether the bubbles referred to boutons or to vesicles, but Pat was obviously correct. Few people today would deny the importance of presynaptic controls. Today when we don’t see the ‘bubbles’ in the electron microscope, we turn to the possibility of volume conduction and so-called non-synaptic modes of transmission (Zoli et al., 1998). Pat’s mind was always open to the unconventional explanation and more often than not his novel interpretation was correct. There are probably also very few scientists in the field who realize that Pat Wall (in collaborative studies with Lennert Heimer) was the first to establish that the substantia gelatinosa is in fact targeted by primary afferents (Heimer and Wall, 1968). Previous studies argued that the afferents only target regions ventral to the substantia gelatinosa (Ralston, 1968). Although some of the anatomy upon which Pat’s ideas were generated have been modified (nota-

bly the extent to which large diameter afferents directly interact with substantia gelatinosa neurons), the importance of this region in the transmission of nociceptive messages has been documented repeatedly. Indeed. with every paper that appears. the neurochemical complexity of the substantia gelatinosa increases. A recent review (Snider and McMahon, 1998) highlighted the fact that in addition to containing a heterogeneous population of intemeurons (see below). two completely distinct populations of primary afferent nociceptor target the inner and outer parts of this region. The outer part of the substantia gelatinosa receives inputs from small diameter afferents that are rich in peptides (notably substance P and CGRP); the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa is targeted by afferents that contain few peptides. Rather these afferents express a unique purinergic (P2X:) receptor and a unique cell surface glycoprotein that can be labeled with the lectin IB4. The peptide and nc;n-peptide populations of afferents are also distinguished by their sensitivity in the adult, to different neurotrophins, nerve growth factor and glial-derived neurotrophic factor. respectively. Pat could not have imagined how chemically complex this region was, but his insights into the importance of the region have been confirmed many times over. Interest in the neurochemical complexity of the substantia gelatinosa, of course, is sustained because we assume that when we understand the functional correlates of this neurochemistry, we will have a much better insight into the causes of persistent pain. It is also hoped that these insights will lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches to treatment. Because of the long-standing interest that Pat has in the organization and function of this region of the spinal cord and because of his particular interest in the mechanisms through which long term changes are produced in the spinal cord, (remember that his student. Lorne Mendell. discovered wind-up (Mendell, 1966)). we dedicate the following review to him. Specifically. we will address recent studies that have identified second messenger systems that are activated by C-fiber inputs and that contribute to the persistent pain conditions produced by tissue ot nerve injury.

2. Cellular mechanisms

of spinal cord plasticity

As in other systems where long-term changes have been examined (e.g. hippocampus and cerebellum (Malenka and Nicoll, 1993)). the majority of studies that have addressed long term changes in nociceptive processing have addressed the effects induced via a glutamate action at the NMDA receptor (Wilcox, 1991). This follows, in part because of the implication of NMDA receptors in long term potentiation, because of the availability of antagonists to this receptor and because the major excitatory neurotransmitter of the C-fiber is glutamate. Indeed. there is considerable evidence that a glutamate action at the NMDA receptor underlies the induction and maintenance, not only of wind-up (Dicken-

K.R. Petersen-Zeit;

A.I. Bnshautn /Pain

son, 1990), but also of the central sensitization that is produced by intense electrical or chemical stimulation of C-fibers (Woolf and Thompson, 1991). Thus, injuryinduced hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with tissue or nerve injury (Davar et al., 1991; Coderre and Melzack, 1992; Mao et al., 1992b; Ren et al., 1992; Yamamoto and Yaksh, 1992; Tal and Bennett, 1993; Chaplan et al., 1997) and the electrophysiological correlates of these (Dickenson and Sullivan, 1987; Dougherty et al., 1993) are inhibited by systemic or intrathecal administration of NMDA receptor antagonists. Providing further evidence for the importance of presynaptic controls (particularly of the unconventional type that Pat championed in the early sixties), our own laboratory has provided a somewhat novel perspective on the mechanisms through which this NMDA-mediated facilitation of the transmission of nociceptive messages is generated. In the course of our immunocytochemical analysis of the distribution of the NMDARl subunit of the receptor, we noted that the receptor is expressed in both pre- and postsynaptic elements in the superficial dorsal horn (Liu et al., 1994). We next used double label studies and confirmed that the receptor is synthesized in dorsal root ganglion cells, transported to the central terminals of primary afferent terminals and localized to the vesicle release site of glutamatergic terminals. Our subsequent studies provided evidence that the presynaptic receptor is functional and that via an autoreceptor on the primary afferent, noxious inputs can generate enhanced release of primary afferent excitatory drive to postsynaptic neurons (Liu et al., 1997). On the other hand, neither activation of the pre nor the postsynaptic NMDA receptor is sufficient to sustain the long-term changes that occur as a result of persistent injury. Because the NMDA receptor is highly permeable to calcium, a number of calcium-dependent second messengers pathways, including protein kinase C (PKC), nitric oxide (NO), and alpha calcium-calmodulin kinase II (aCaMKII), are activated when Ca2+ is gated by the NMDA receptor (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Mao et al., 199.5; Mayer and Westbrook, 1987). These second messenger cascades, in turn establish long-term changes in neurons (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Coderre et al., 1993). In many respects the types of changes that have been observed in the development of long term potentiation in the hippocampus have been observed in the spinal cord, when inputs are generated in the setting of intense stimulation or persistent injury (Malinow et al., 1989; Coderre, 1992; Abeliovich et al., 1993; Meller et al., 1994; Mao et al., 1995; Lin et al., 1996). The problem with many of these studies is that the antagonists that have been used to implicate, for example PKC, are not at all selective for the multiple isoforms of this enzyme, or even for the particular class of enzyme. We, therefore, turned to a study of mice in which the genes that encode different second messenger molecules have been eliminated.

Supplemerzt 6

(I 999)X-S12

3. Cellular mechanisms kinase A

Sl

of spinal cord plasticity:

protein

Our first studies examined the contribution of the gene that encodes the RIP regulatory subunit of protein kinase A, which is a CAMP-dependent second messenger that is distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system (Malmberg et al., 1997a,b). Compared to their wild type littermates, we found that acute pain indices did not differ in mice that carry a null mutation in this gene. However, tissue injury-evoked persistent pain behavior, inflammation of the hindpaw and ipsilateral dorsal horn Fos expression were significantly reduced in the mutant mice, as was plasma extravasation induced by intradermal injection of capsaicin into the paw. Consistent with studies of Levine and colleagues (Taiwo et al., 1989) who implicated CAMPdependent mechanisms in the sensitization of primary afferent C-fibers, we also found that the enhanced thermal sensitivity observed in wild-type mice after intraplantar or intrathecal (spinal) administration of prostaglandin E2 was significantly reduced in the mutant mice. In contrast, indices of pain behavior produced by partial sciatic nerve section (Malmberg and Basbaum, 1998), namely thermal and mechanical allodynia, were not altered in the mutant mice. Based on these studies, we concluded that the RIP subunit of PKA is necessary for the full expression of tissue injuryevoked (nociceptive) pain but does not appear to be required for nerve injury-evoked (neuropathic) pain. Because the RIP subunit is only present in the nervous system, including small diameter trkA receptor-positive dorsal root ganglion cells, we suggested that in inflammatory conditions, the RIP subunit of PKA is specifically required for nociceptive processing in the central and peripheral terminals of small-diameter primary afferent fibers. On the other hand, although the animals showed a deficit in the response to intrathecally administered PGE?, these studies did not specifically point to the substantia gelatinosa as the locus of the central changes that influence the primary afferent terminal. In fact, we are still ignorant as to the cells of origin of the endogenous PGE, that can influence the terminal; it may be neuronal or glial-derived.

4. Cellular mechanisms kinase C gamma

of spinal cord plasticity:

protein

Our subsequent studies of the development of persistent pain conditions pointed directly to second messenger systems produced by substantia gelatinosa neurons. In these studies. we evaluated mice with a deletion of the gene that encodes the gamma subunit of protein kinase C (PKCy; (Malmberg et al., 1997a,b)). Importantly, this isoform of PKC (a calcium-dependent enzyme) is not present until after birth, so that developmental abnormalities or compensatory responses to its loss are less likely to have occurred. Furthermore, unlike other PKC isoforms, PKCy is

only expressed in the CNS. As for PKA, mice with deletion of PKCy were completely normal in tests of acute pain. This was true for noxious thermal and noxious mechanical stimuli. However. the PKCy null mice almost completely failed to develop a neuropathic pain syndrome (thermal and mechanical allodynia) after partial sciatic nerve section. Although PKCy is expressed in numerous places in the brain (particularly in the hippocampus and cerebellum) its expression in the spinal cord is restricted to a population of interneurons in the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa. When viewed in sagittal sections (Martin et al., 1999), the neurons have the characteristic morphology of the islet cells (Gobel, 1978). whose dendrites and axons arborize within the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa. In other words, the circuitry through which these interneurons are likely to influence the transmission of nociceptive messages must occur within the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa. Furthermore, based on our subsequent double label studies, we showed that markers of inhibitory interneurons rarely were found in the PKCy-containing interneurons (Martin et al., 1999). It follows that the great majority of the PKCy-containing intemeurons must be excitatory. Based on these observations, we believe that the failure to develop nerve injury induced thermal and mechanical allodynia reflects alterations in a circuit that involves the non-peptide population of C-fiber (which selectively targets the inner substantia gelatinosa), a PKCy-containing excitatory interneuron and a nociresponsive projection neuron. Given that the dendrites of overlying projection neurons of lamina I rarely penetrate the substantia gelatinosa (Gobel. 1978; Beal, 1979; Light et al., 1979). we further suggest that the circuit controlled via the PKCy-containing interneuron involves the lamina V neuron. In fact, our recent electrophysiological studies in the spinal cord of mice with a deletion of PKCy indicate that neurons of lamina V do not develop long term sensitization in the setting of injury, even though the response to acute noxious stimulation is comparable to that of the wild type mice (Martin and Basbaum, 1998). As noted above. one of the propositions upon which the Gate Control Theory of Pain is based is that there is a critical interaction of activity generated via inputs in small (A delta and C) and large fibers. Any disruption of the balance in activity in these different afferent groups could result in an abnormal pain condition. Of course Gate Control emphasized the ‘closing’ function of the large fibers. via their activation of inhibitory interneurons in the substantia gelatinosa. Often overlooked, however, is the fact the Gate Control circuit also included a direct excitatory input from the large fibers to the ‘transmission’ neuron. That connection made sense because of the evidence for the existence of wide-dynamic range neurons. which receive a convergent nociceptive and non-nociceptive input. Recent studies. of course, have provided evidence that under pathological conditions, the input transmitted via A beta (i.e. large diameter afferents) is a major contributor to the mechanical

allodynia that occurs (Campbell et al., 1988; Andersen et al., 1995). Furthermore, thtre is now considerable evidence that in the setting of injury large diameter afferents can sprout and eventually make contact with neurons with which they do not normally interact (Doubell et al.. 1997). One interesting possibility is that the PKCy-containing interneurons come under the influence of sprouted large diameter afferents, thus contributing to the allodynia observed in the setting of nerve injury. Calcium-dependent protein kinases have not only been strongly implicated in spinal cord mechanisms of sensitization, leading to allodynic and hyperalgesic conditions (Coderre. 1992; Mao et al., 1992a,b, 1993; Yashpal et al.. 1995; Peng et al., 1997) but they have also been implicated in the development of tolerance to the analgesic effects of morphine (Mayer et al., 1995). Most interestingly, based on studies of Mao and colleagues, it has been hypothesized that activation of PKC in neurons of the superficial dorsal horn contributes both to the development of sensitization in the setting of injury and to the development of morphine (Mao et al., 1995). For example, chronic administration of morphine not only produces tolerance but it also increases the level of PKC, notably within laminae I and II. The latter was concluded from the finding of an increase in membrane bound PKC under morphine tolerant conditions. The increase in membrane bound PKC was inferred from an increase in phorbol ester binding and was presumed to result from a translocation of the enzyme from the cytosol to the membrane during tolerance development. In light of the evidence for a contribution of NMDA receptor mechanisms to the development of tolerance (Trujillo and Akil. 1991: Elliott et al.. 1994) and because PKC has been shown to regulate the NMDA receptor (its phosphorylation reduces the magnesium block (Chen and Huang, 1992)), the authors hypothesized that the development of tolerance reflects a PKC-mediated increase in opioid regulation of the NMDA receptor. Numerous studies remain to be performed to confirm those observations, however, they provide further evidence for the critical importance of the substantia gelatinosa to the development of long term changes in nociceptive processing, in this case under conditions in which drugs that normally block the transmission of nociceptive messages, namely opioids, are administered.

5. Cellular mechanisms oxide

of spinal cord plasticity:

nitric

The fact that the PKCy appears to be concentrated in excitatory interneurons of the substantia gelatinosa provides some clues to the contribution of the excitatory population of interneuron, but we are left with the contribution of the far larger group of inhibitory interneurons. Perhaps Gate Control Theory’s most controversial aspect relates to the complex function that it assigned to the interneurons of the substantia gelatinosa. Although the Gate Control Theory model only

included a single inhibitory substantia gelatinosa interneuron, it was obvious that this was a black box formulation. The inhibitory interneuron included in the ‘Gate’ diagram was merely the final interneuron in a complex circuit located within the substantia gelatinosa. Because primary afferents are exclusively excitatory (or were certainly assumed to be so in 1965) the hypothesis that the C fibers inhibited the ‘inhibitory’ substantia gelatinosa neuron required that there were multiple intervening neurons involved. Activation of cascades of inhibitory interneurons leading to disinhibition was certainly a possibility and indeed recent studies have provided considerable evidence that loss of GABAergic inhibitory control in the substantia gelatinosa may underlie the development of persistent pain conditions (Hao et al., 1992). But this loss of GABAergic control would more likely account for the loss of large fiber-mediated inhibition, not for the enhancement produced via the activation of C fibers. Studies of the distribution and contribution of nitric oxide to nociceptive processing in the setting of injury, however, provide evidence that the GABAergic inhibitory interneurons are far more complex than previously imagined. Based on studies of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, it has been demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO), which is produced by the calcium/calmodulin dependent enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS), contributes to NMDA receptor-dependent long term potentiation (Schuman and Madison, 1991). Subsequent studies of its function in the context of nociceptive processing provided evidence for a comparable function in the spinal cord. For example, inhibitors of NOS do not alter the processing of acute nociceptive messages, but significantly reduce the hyperalgesia associated with persistent injury (Meller et al., 1992; Malmberg and Yaksh, 1993; Meller and Gebhart, 1993). Although it was not surprising to find that the enzyme is concentrated in the superficial dorsal horn (Bredt et al., 1991) and to show that the enzyme increases in a chronic arthritis model (Wu et al., 1998) it was quite surprising to find that the enzyme is almost exclusively found to colocalize with markers of GABAergic inhibitory intemeurons (Spike et al., 1993). How then can the same neuron mediate a facilitatory and an inhibitory control of nociceptive processing? Although the precise molecular mechanisms by which NO mediates injury-induced changes in spinal cord processing are not understood, some insight has been gained by further analysis of the neurochemistry of the substantia gelatinosa. Specifically, it has been suggested that NO signaling occurs primarily through the activation of soluble isoforms of guanylyl cyclase that increase intracellular cGMP levels to activate cGMP-dependent protein kinases. The cGMPdependent protein kinase, cGKI, however is not expressed in neurons intrinsic to the dorsal horn, but rather, is concentrated in small- and medium-diameter DRG neurons (Qian et al., 1996). This suggests that in order to mediate synaptic plasticity NO must either act through different cellular mechanisms in spinal cord neurons or that it must act upon neurons outside of the cells in which it is synthesized.

Because NO is a small, gaseous molecule, it is has been proposed that NO diffuses out of neurons in the substantia gelatinosa to act in a retrograde fashion on primary afferent neurons and that this activity underlies changes in nociceptive processing associated with injury (Meller and Gebhart. 1993). Importantly, cGMP analogs as well as guanylyl cyclase inhibitors have been demonstrated to have effects similar to those seen with activators and inhibitors of the NOS pathway (Meller et al., 1992; Garry et al., 1994). Thus the same substantia gelatinosa interneuron may exert presynaptic inhibitory as well as facilitatory controls upon primary afferents. Of course, the controls exerted via NOS would not have an anatomical substrate that can be observed in the electron microscope. This would clearly be one more example of presynaptic controls that cannot be identified when one only focuses on the ‘bubbles’ in the electron microscope.

6. Cellular mechanisms &aMKII

of spinal cord plasticity:

The studies described above provide strong evidence that the chemistry of the intemeurons of the substantia gelatinosa is key to understanding how long term changes are induced by injury and how these changes contribute to the development of persistent pain conditions. More recently, our attention has turned to other second messenger systems that are likely to contribute to the hyperexcitability that characterizes the injury state. The alpha isoform of calcium-calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (crCaMKII) is a neural-specific enzyme that has been implicated in prolonged changes in synaptic function (Hanson and Schulman, 1992). Among the proteins targeted by cuCaMKII are the AMPA and NMDA receptors and synapsin I (Benfenati et al., 1992; Kitamura et al.. 1993; McGladeMcCulloh et al., 1993; Omkumar et al., 1996; Barria et al., 1997). Abundantly expressed in postsynaptic densities, this enzyme is a serine-threonine kinase that is activated by the binding of calcium-bound calmodulin to a domain near its C-terminal end. This relieves the protein’s catalytic domain of autoinhibition and permits the enzyme to autophosphorylate a key threonine residue (Miller et al., 1988; Thiel et al., 1988; Lou and Schulman, 1989). Interestingly, Thr286 phosphorylation enables cuCaMKI1 to switch into an ‘on’ state that persists when calcium levels return to baseline (Saitoh and Schwartz, 1985; Miller and Kennedy, 1986; Miller et al., 1988). This calcium-independent activity of cvCaMKI1 has given rise to the hypothesis that the enzyme serves to store synaptic memories for postsynaptic neurons (Lisman, 1994). Indeed, aCaMKII does appear to be necessary for the development of prolonged synaptic changes, notably NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) at the CA3-CA1 synapse in the hippocampus (Malenka et al., 1989; Malinow et al., 1989; Silva et al., 1992). Importantly, the action of this enzyme is not limited

to the hippocampus. (wCaMKI1 has also been implicated in activity-dependent plasticity in adult mouse visual cortex and in whisker barrel cortex (Glazewski et al.. 1996; Kirkwood et al., 1997). Based on preliminary studies of the distribution of the enzyme in the spinal cord, we hypothesize that aCaMKI1 also contributes to the development of persistent changes in nociceptive processing at the spinal cord level. In fact, there is evidence that intracellular application of autophosphorylated cvCaMKI1 can enhance excitatory synaptic transmission of substantia gelatinosa neurons (Kolaj et al.. 1994). Although in situ studies found only moderate levels of aCaMKI1 in spinal cord (Benson et al., 1992) our immunocytochemical analysis found very high concentrations in superficial dorsal horn (Basbaum and Kennedy, 1986). Of particular interest, we recently found that a very high proportion of PKCy-containing interneurons of the inner part of the substantia gelatinosa cocontain uCaMKII. This observation is particularly interesting because there is evidence that the two second messenger systems interact in the generation of long term potentiation in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. For example, it has been demonstrated that the LTP produced by injection of calcium-calmodulin (which activates aCaMKI1) is blocked by inhibitors of PKC (Wang and Kelly, 1995). Given the colocalization of aCaMKI1 with PKCy in the substantia gelatinosa, we are very interested in determining whether these two molecules interact in the development of central sensitization.

7. Summary We have come a long way from the simple circuit that Gate Control Theory described. Gate Control Theory emphasized how large and small fibers close and open a gate, respectively, by turning a key that was inherent in the workings of a substantia gelatinosa interneuron. We now know that there are numerous ways to enhance nociceptive transmission. Clearly, the Gate can be opened and closed by a slew of keys, not all of which have been identified. The presence of many keys, of course, means that there are multiple substantia gelatinosa circuits through which the transmission of nociceptive messages can be reduced or enhanced. Among Pat’s incredible contributions to the growth of pain research was his recognition that the substantia gelatinosa is the depository of the keys. We do not know how many more keys are stored there, but we will continue to seek them out.

Acknowledgements This work was supported by: NS 14627. KRP is supported by a fellowship from the National Science Foundation.

References Abeliovich A. Chen C. Coda Y. Silva AJ. Stevens CF. Tonegawa S. Moditied hippocampal long-term potentiation in PKC gamma-mutant mice. Cell 1993:75: 12.53-1262. Andersen OK. Gracely RH. Arendt-Nielsen L. Facilitation of the human nociceptive reflex by stimulation of A-beta tibres in a jccondary hyperalgesic area sustained by nociceptive input from the primary hyperalgesic area. Acta Physiol Stand 1995;155:87-97. Barria A, Muller D. Derkach V. Griflith LC, Soderling TR. Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation [see comments]. Science 1997:276:X42-2045. Basbaum AI, Kennedy MB. Immunocytochemical localiration of the alpha subunit of type II Ca’ /calmodulin kinase (CaM) in the caudal medulla and spinal cord: specific labelling of the corticobpinal tract. Neurosci Abst 1986:12:144. Beal JA. The ventral dendritic arbor of marginal (Lamina I) neurons in the adult primate spinal cord. Neurosci Lett 1979:14:201-206. Benfenati F, Valtorta F. Rubenstein JL, Gorelick FS, Greengard P. Czernik AJ. Synaptic vesicle-associated Ca’ ’ icalmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is a binding protein for synapsin I. Nature (Land) 1992;359:417-420. Benson DL. Isackson PJ, Gall CM, Jones EG. Contrasting patterns in the localization of glutamic acid decarboxylase and Ca’ /calmodulin protein kinase gene expression in the rat central nervous system. Neuroscience 1992;46:825-849. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature (Land) 1993:361:31-39. Bredt DS, Glatt CE. Hwang PM, Fotuhi M. Dawson TM, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide synthase protein and mRNA are discretely localized in neuronal populations of the mammalian CNS together with NADPH diaphorase. Neuron 1991;7:615-624. Campbell JN, Ra,ja SN. Meyer RA. Mackinnon SE. Myelinated afferents signal the hyperalgesia associated with nerve injury. Pain 1988:32:X994. Chaplan SR. Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL. Etficacy of spinal NMDA receptor antagonism in formalin hyperalgesia and nerve injury evoked allodynia in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997:280:829%838. Chen L, Huang LY. Protein kinase C reduces Mg’ block of NMDAreceptor channels as a mechanism of modulation. Nature (Land) 1992;356:521-523. Coderre TJ, Melrack R. The role of NMDA receptor-operated calcium channels in persistent nociception after formalin-induced tissue injury. J Neurosci 1992:12:3671-3675. Coderre TJ. Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R. Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain 1993:52:259%285. Coderre TJ. Contribution of protein kinase C to central sensitization and persistent painfollowing tissue injury. Neurosci Lett 1992:140:181-1X4. Cook AJ, Woolf CJ, Wall PD. Prolonged C-fibre mediated facilitation of the flexion reflex in the rat is not due to changes in afferent terminal or motoneurone excitability. Neurosci Lett 1986:70:91-96. Davar G, Hama A. Deykin A, Vos B. Maciewicz R. MK-801 blocks the development of thermal hyperalgesia in a rat model of experimental painful neuropathy. Brain Res 1991:553:327-330. Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF. Evidence for a role of the NMDA receptor In the frequency dependent potentiation of deep rat dorsal horn nociceptive neurones following C tibre stimulation. Neurophannacology 1987;26:1235-1238. Dickenson AH. A cure for wind up; NMDA receptor antagonista ah potential analgesics. Trends Pharm Sci 1990: I1:307-309. Doubell TP, Mannion RJ. Woolf CJ. Intact sciatic myelinated primary afferent terminals collaterally sprout in the adult rat dorsal horn following section of a neighbouring peripheral nerve. J Comp Nemo1 1997;380:95-104. Dougherty PM, Palecek J, Zorn S, Willis WD. Combined application of

excitatory amino acids and substance P produces long-lasting changes in responses of primate spinothalamic tract neurons. Brain Res Rev 1993;18:227-246. Elliott K. Minami N, Kolesnikov YA, Pasternak GW, Inturrisi CE. The NMDA receptor antagonistsLY and MK-801, and the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine. attenuate analgesic tolerance to the mu-opioid morphine but not to kappa opioids. Pain 1994;56:69-75. Garry MG, Abraham E, Hargreaves KM, Aanonsen LM. Intrathecal injection of cell-permeable analogs ofcyclic 3’.5’-guanosine monophosphate produces hyperalgesia in mice. Em J Pharmacol 1994260: 129-I 3 1. Glazewski S. Chen CM, Silva A. Fox K. Requirement for alpha-CaMKlI in experience-dependent plasticity of the barrel cortex. Science 1996:272:421423. Gobel S. Golgi studies of the neurons in layer I and II of the dorsal horn of the medulla (trigeminal nucleus caudalis). J Comp Neurol 1978;180:375394. Hanson PI. Schulman H. Neuronal Ca’+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Ann Rev Biochem 1992;61:559601. Hao JX, Xu XJ, Yu YX, Seiger A,, Wiesenfeld HZ. Baclofen reverses the hypersensitivity of dorsal horn wide dynamic range neurons to mechanical stimulation after transient spinal cord &hernia; implications for a tonic GABAergic inhibitory control of myelinated fiber input. J Neurophysiol 1992:68:392-396. Heimer L, Wall PD. The dorsal root distribution to the subatantia gelatinoaa of the rat with a note on the distribution in the cat. Exp Brain Res 1968;6:89-99. Hillman P, Wall PD. Inhibitory and excitatory factors influencing the receptive fields of lamina 5 spinal cord cells. Exp Brain Res 1969:9:284-306. Kirkwood A, Silva A, Bear MF. Age-dependent decrease of synaptic plasticity in the neocortex of alphaCaMKI1 mutant mice. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 1997:94:3380-3383. Kitamura Y. Miyazaki A, Yamanaka Y, Nomura Y. Stimulatory effects of protein kinase C and calmodulin kinase II on N-methyl-o-aspartate receptor/channels in the postsynaptic density of rat brain. J Neurochem 1993:61:100-109. Kolaj M. Cerne R, Cheng G. Brickey DA. Randic M. Alpha subunit of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase enhances excitatory amino acid and synaptic responses of rat spinal dorsal horn neurons. J Neurophysiol 1994:72:2525-2531. Light AR, Trevino DL. Per1 ER. Morphological features of functionally identitied neurons in the marginal zone and substantia gelatinosa of the spinal dorsal horn. J Comp Neurol 1979:186:325-330. Lin Q. Peng YB. Willis WD. Possible role of protein kinase C in the sensitization of primate spinothalamic tract neurons. J Neurosci 1996; 16:3026-3034. Lisman J. The CaM kinase II hypothesis for the storage of synaptic memory. Trends Neurosci 1994;17:406412. Liu H, Wang H. Sheng M. Jan LY. Jan YN, Basbaum AI. Evidence for presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate autoreceptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 1994:91:8383-8387. Liu H. Mantyh PW, Basbaum AI. NMDA-receptor regulation of substance P release from primary afferent nociceptors. Nature (Land) 1997:386:721724. Lou LL. Schulman H. Distinct autophosphorylation sites sequentially produce autonomy and inhibition of the multifunctional Ca’ ‘/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. J Neurosci 1989:9:2020-2032. Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity: multiple forms and mechanisms. Trends Neurosci 1993:16:521-527. Malenka RC. Kauer JA, Perkel DJ. Mauk MD, Kelly PT, Nicoll RA, Waxham MN. An essential role for postsynaptic calmodulin and protein kinase activity in long-term potentiation. Nature (Land) 1989:340:554557. Malinow R, Schulman H. Tsien RW. Inhibition of postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII blocks induction but not expression of LTP. Science 1989;245:862-866, Malmberg AB. Basbaum AI. Partial injury to the sciatic nerve in the mouse:

neuropathic pain behavior and dorsal horn plasticity. Pain 1998:76:215-222. Malmberg AB. Yaksh TL. Spinal nitric oxide synthesis inhibition blocks NMDA-induced thermal hyperalgesia and produces antinociception in the formalin test in rats. Pain 1993;54:291-300. Malmberg AB, Brandon EP. Idzerda RL, Liu H. McKnight GS. Basbaum AI. Diminished inflammation and nociceptive pain with preservation of neuropathic pain in mice with a targeted mutation of the type I regulatory subunit of CAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Neurosci 1997a;l7:7462-7470. Malmberg AB, Chen C, Tonegawa S, Baabaum AI. Preserved acute pain and reduced neuropathic pain in mice lacking PKC gamma. Science 1997b:278:279-283. Mao J. Price DD. Mayer DJ, Hayes RL. Pain-related increases in spinal cord membrane-bound protein kinase C following peripheral nerve injury. Brain Res 1992a:588:144-149. Mao J. Price DD, Mayer DJ. Lu J. Hayes RL. Intrathecal MK-801 and local nerve anesthesia synergistically reduce nociceptive behaviors in rats with experimental peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1992b:576:2.54-262. Mao J. Mayer DJ, Hayes RL, Price DD. Spatial patterns of increased spinal cord membrane-bound protein kinase C and their relation to increases in “C-2.deoxyglucose metabolic activity in rats with painful peripheral mononeuropathy. J Neurophysiol 1993:70:470-48 1. Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ. Mechanisms of hyperalgesia and morphine tolerance: a current view of their possible interactions. Pain 1995:62:259-274. Martin WJ. Basbaum AI. Absence of prolonged sensitization in spinal cord nociceptive neurons: an electrophysiological analysis of protein kinase Cy mutant mice. Neurosci Abst 1998:24:880. Martin WJ, Liu H, Wang H, Malmberg AB, Basbaum AI. Inflammationinduced upregulation of protein kinase Cy immunoreactivity in rat spinal cord correlates with enhanced nociceptive processing. Neuroscience 1999;88: 1267-1274. Mayer ML, Westbrook CL. The physiology of excitatory amino acids in the vertebrate central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 1987;28: 197-276. Mayer DJ. Mao J. Price DD. The development of morphine tolerance and dependence is associated with translocation of protein kinase C. Pain 1995:61:3655374. McGlade-McCulloh E, Yamamoto H. Tan SE. Brickey DA, Soderling TR. Phosphorylationandregulationofglutamatereceptorsbycalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Nature (Land) 1993:362:640-642. Meller ST. Gebhart GF. Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Pain 1993:52:127-l 36. Meller ST, Pechman PS, Gebhart GF, Maves TJ. Nitric oxide mediates the thermal hyperalgesia produced in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat. Neuroscience 1992:50:7-10. Meller ST. Cummings CP. Traub RJ. Gebhart GF. The role of nitric oxide in the development and maintenance of the hyperalgesia produced by intraplantar injection of carrageenan in the rat. Neuroscience 1994:60:367-374. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965:150:971-979. Mendell LM. Wall PD. Preaynaptic hyperpolarization: a role for fine afferent hbres. J Physiol (Land) 1964;172:274-294. Mendell LM. Physiological properties of unmyelinated fiber projection to the spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1966;16:316-332. Miller SG. Kennedy MB. Regulation of brain type II Ca’+/calmodulindependent protein kinase by autophosphorylation: a Ca’ ’ -triggered molecular switch. Cell 1986:44:861-X70. Miller SG, Patton BL, Kennedy MB. Sequences of autophosphorylation sites in neuronal type II CaM kinase that control Ca’ -independent activity. Neuron 1988:1:593-604. Omkumar RV, Kiely MJ. Rosenstein AJ, Min KT, Kennedy MB. Identification of a phosphorylation site for calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I1 in the NRZB subunit of the N-methyl-o-aspartate receptor. J Biol Chem 1996;271:31670-3 1678.

s17

K.R. Petersen-Zeitz.

A.I. Basbaum /Pain

Peng YB, Lin Q. Willis WD. Involvement of proteinkinase C in responses of mt dorsal horn neurons to mechanical stimuli and periaqueductal gray descending inhibition. Exp Brain Res 1997;114:561-570. Qian Y, Chao DS, Santillano DR, Cornwell TL. Naim AC, Greengard P. Lincoln TM, Bredt DS. cGMP-dependent protein kinase in dorsal root ganglion: relationship with nitric oxide synthase and nociceptive neurons. J Neurosci 1996;16:3330-3138. Ralston III HJ. Dorsal root projections to dorsal horn neurons in the cat spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1968;132:303-330. Ren K, Hylden J, Williams GM. Ruda MA, Dubner R. The effects of a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, on behavioral hyperalgesia and dorsal horn neuronal activity in rats with unilateral inflammation. Pain 1992:50:331-344. Saitoh T, Schwartz JH. Phosphorylation-dependent subcellular translocation of a Ca”/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase produces an autonomous enzyme in Aplysia neurons. J Cell Biol 1985;100:835-842. Schuman EM, Madison DV. A requirement for the intercellular messenger nitric oxide in long-tenn potentiation. Science 1991:254:1.503-1506. Silva AJ. Stevens CF. Tonegawa S, Wang Y. Deficient hippocampal longterm potentiation in alpha-calciumcalmodulin kinase II mutant mice [see comments]. Science 1992;257:2Oll206. Snider WD. McMahon SB. Tackling pain at the source: new ideas about nociceptors. Neuron 1998;20:629%632. Spike RC. Todd AJ, Johnston HM. Coexistence of NADPH diaphorase with GABA, glycine, and acetylcholine in rat spinal cord. J Comp Neural 1993;335:32G333. Taiwo YO, Bjerknes LK, Goetzl EJ, Levine JD. Mediation of primary afferent peripheral hyperalgesia by the CAMP second messenger system. Neuroscience 1989;32:577-580. Tal M, Bennett GJ. Dextrorphan relieves neuropathic heat-evoked hyperalgesia in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1993;151:107-110. Thiel Cl. Czemik AJ, Gorelick F, Naim AC, Greengard P. Ca”/calmodulindependent protein kinase II: identification of threonine-286 as the autophosphorylation site in the alpha subunit associated with the

Supplement 6 (1999) S5-SI-3

generation of Ca”-independent activity. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 1988;85:6337-6341. Trujillo KA, Akil H. Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Science I99 1:25 1:85%87. Wall PD. The origin of a spinal cord slow potential. J Physiol (Londl 1962: 164:508-526. Wall PD. Presynaptic control of impulses at the tirst central synapse in the cutaneous pathway. Prog Brain Res 1964; 12:92-l 1S. Wall PD. The laminar organization of dorsal horn and effect\ of descending impulses. J Physiol (Land) 1967;188:403-423. Wang JH, Kelly PT. Postsynaptic injection of CA”/CaM induces synaptic potentiation requiring CaMKII and PKC activity. Neuron 199.5; 1S:443452. Wilcox GL. Excitatory neurotransmitters and pain. In: Bond MR. Charlton JE, Woolf CJ. editors. Proceedings of the VIth World Congress on Pain, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers. I99 1. pp. 9771 1 I Woolf CJ. Thompson SW. The induction and maintenance of central semitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 1991;44:293-299. Wu J, Lin Q, Lu Y, Willis WD, Westlund KN. Changes in nitric oxide synthase isoforms in the spinal cord of rat following induction of chronic arthritis. Exp Brain Res 199X:1 18:457465. Yamamoto T. Yaksh TL. Spinal pharmacology of thermal hyperesthesia induced by constriction injury of sciatic nerve: excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1992;49:121-128. Yashpal K, Pitcher GM, Parent A, Quirion R, Coderre TJ. Noxious thermal and chemical stimulation induce increases in ‘H-phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate binding in spinal cord dorsal horn as well as persistent pain and hyperalgesia, which is reduced by inhibition of protein kinase C. J Neurosci 1995;15:3263-3272. Zoli M. Torri C, Ferrari R, Jansson A, Zini 1. Fuxe K, Agnati LF. The emergence of the volume transmission concept. Brain Res Rev 199826: 1366147.