ELSEVIER
Journal of Mdccdar
Liquids67 (1995)133- 155
Second-order nonlinear optics in isotropic liquids: Hyper-Rayleigh scattering in solution.
In honour of Prof. Em. Pierre Huyskens on the occasion of his retirement
Koen Clays, Eric He&-i&x,
Myriam Triest, and Andre Persoons
Laboratory of Chemical and BiologicalDynamics Centerfor Research in Molecular Photonicsand Electronics Universityof Leuven, Celestijnenlaan2000, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
The incoherent second-order nonlinear light scattering in a macroscopically isotropic molecular liquid has emerged as a simple and widely applicable determination
of the ftrst hyperpolarizability
technique
technique has become widely known as hyper-Rayleigh scattering. field-induced
second-harmonic
molecular hyperpolarizabilities. also limits its applicability
for the experimental
of nonlinear optical molecules in solution.
The
Until recently, elecnic-
generation was the only solution technique
to determine
Apart from being more complex a technique, the applied field
to neutral and dipolar solutions.
In this paper, we present the
specific advantages of the new hyper-Rayleigh scattering technique and exemplify its wider scope with results from three different kinds of molecular materials: octopoles, biological chromophores, and quantum colloids. 0167-7322/95/$09.50 0 1995E1sevierScienceB.V. All rights reserved SSD/O167-7322(95)00872-l
134
I. Introduction
The high peak power available in the early pulsed laser sources led to the experimental discovery of nonlinear optical (IVLO) effects in the 1960’s. Frequency-doubling centrosymmetric scattering
crystal was the first of these effects to be 0bserved.l
in isotropic samples was discovered only a few years later.:!
in a non-
Elastic harmonic The spatial and
temporal profile of the optical output of the early pulsed lasers did not allow for accurate intensity measurements of the second-order scattered light, precluding the retrieval of a value for the hyperpolarizability of the molecules in solution. The application of an electric field over a solution of dipolar molecules3 induced the polar order necessary for second-order nonlinear optical effects to be observed on a macroscopic scale. The electric-field-induced
second-
harmonic generation (EFISHG) technique kcame the standard technique for the experimental determination
of the fast hyperpolarizability.4‘6
The electro-optically
Q-switched Nd:YAG
laser is a reliable source for the fundamental beam. The interaction between orienting field and dipolar molecules is well known.7
Over a period of some 20 years, EFISHG was used to
measure a wealth of hyperpolarizability
data on dipolar molecules,8~g leading to snucmre-
property relationships that are strongly biased towards the dipolar paradigm
The necessary application of an electric field to induce the polar order on a macroscopic scale has a number of disadvantages.
First of all, the technique is inherently
limited in
applicability to neutral and dipolar molecules. The interaction of the orienting DC field with the second hyperpolarizability contribution
also generates light at the second-harmonic
frequency.
This
is normally neglected. The experimental result is then the scalar product of the
vector part of the hyperpolarizability tensor with the dipole moment vector. Therefore, one has to know the magnitude and the relative orientation of the dipole moment with respect to the hyperpolarizability.
The angle between the two is normally assumed to be either 0 or 180
degrees. One is then left with the problem of estimating the dipole moment in its own reaction field.7 The calculation of the local field factor normally uses the Lorentz approximation.
The
ultimate result is only the vector part of the hyperpolruizability tensor. Finally, the cell design is not straightforward
and does not allow routine measurement
or even automation
of the
procedure.
Injection
seeding of Q-switched lasers is a technique
longitudinal mode to lase.1°-12 and spatial pulse profile. characteristics,
This preventsmode
to allow only one single
beating and results in a smooth temporal
Using this fundamental
laser source with much improved
we recurred to the original elastic harmonic light scattering to overcome the
135
limitations
of the EFISHG technique.
It proved possible to systematically
Rayleigh scattering @IRS) intensity of the nonlinearly
study the hyper-
scattered light as a function of the
fundamental light intensity and concentration of NLO molecules, which results in a value for the molecular
hyperpolarizability.
13 The systematic
study of structural,
solvent, and
wavelength dependence of this value has led to a reconsideration of the molecularstructural requirements for efficient second-order effects.
In this contribution the theoretical basis of hyper-Rayleigh scattering is briefly recalled in Section II. The experimental set-up, originally developed with Q-switched nanosecond pulsed lasers, but now also extended to tunable femtosecond continuous wave laser sources, is described in Section III. As a typical example of the new classes of materials that can be measured by HRS, octopolar molecules and their hyperpolarizability
are discussed in Section
IV. The discovery of a large nonlinear effect in the protein Bacteriorhodopsin systematic
study of the NLO properties of biological chromophores.
led us to a
An overview of the
results from this ongoing study is presented in Section V. The third-order NLO properties of quantum colloids
have been studied for some time.
In section VI, we present the first
preliminary results on the second-order susceptibility of these artificial materials.
II. Theoretical framework On the microscopic level, the induced dipole moment per molecule is
Here, pi is the component of the induced dipole moment along the molecule-fixed i-axis, is the &component
of the second-rank, first-order (3x3 = 9 elements) polarizabity
piik is the #-component hyperpolarizability
of the third-rank,
second-order
tensor fi, yijkl is the ijkl-component
first
third-order
tensor x and Ej is the electric-field
(3x3~3~3 = 81 elements)
second hyperpolarizability
component along the@&.
The classical Einstein summation convention applies.
At the macroscopic
tensor a,
(3x3~3 = 27 elements) of the fourth-rank,
aii
level, the analogous equation applies.
Limiting the analysis to
second-order effects, the induced dipole moment per volume unit Pi (2 0)becomes
(2)
136
The ikl-component Bikr (-2W;
of the
macroscopic
second-order
nonlinear
susceptibility,
0, W) is only zero when averaged over time or space. Translational fluctuations
(density fluctuations)
result in a nonzero linear susceptibility,
leading to first-order
linear
Rayleigh scattering. For second-order effects, spatial and/or temporal orientational fluctuations are the cause of a non-zero susceptibility
Bi~,(-261;0,0)
scattering. Correlations between the values Bikl,l(-20;
leading to hyper-Rayleigh
O, O) and Bj~,2 (-2 0; O, W) for
two different volumes 1 and 2 are assumed to exist only over distances small compared to the wavelength.
The intensity
of the hyper-Rayleigh
signal then becomes proportional
to
dv . For randomly oriented individual molecules, them are no specific phase( Bikl,l Bjmn,2) av relations between the scatteredfieldr. This allows the summation of the individual scattering intensities.
The intensity of the harmonic scattered light then becomes proportional
concentration direction
of the NLO molecules and to (&,,,flXYr)(IV.
cosines
over all possible directions
to the
Averaging the product of the
for an isotropic
system then gives the
transformation between molecule-fixed axis and laboratory coordinates. The resulting formulae ,143
where ij and k are the molecule-futed Cartesian coordinates, while X, Y and Z refer to the laboratory frame. These expressions form the basis of the analysis of the scattering intensities for different polarizations towards values for molecular hyperpolarizability tensor components. The number of non-zero tensor components depends on the specific symmetry of the molecule. consequence, symmetries.
is different for different molecular p ( ~)l(p:,) The first reports of harmonic light scattering did not include an actual value for the depolarization ratio,
hyperpolarizability be measured,
tensor components, but the relative ease with which depolarization ratios can
spurred the study of tetrahedral molecules.
hyperpolarizability depolarization
As a
There is only one non-zero
tensor component for this specific symmetry,
ratio of 3/2. The deviation of the experimentally
p,,
resulting
in a
observed ratio .from this
theoretical value was then interpreted as indicative of molecular interaction.2J5
137
For the historically important class of asymmetrically para-substituted electron systems, there is only one dominant tensor component.
conjugated IF-
This is the charge-transfer
component along the direction of the molecular z-axis. Tbe term &
is then by far the largest
in Eqs. 3 and 4. The total intensity of the harmonic scattered light can then be written as
The proportionality factor G includes all the theoretical factors, such as the wavelength, angular and distance dependence
of the scattered intensity and the average of the products of the
direction cosines (i.e. l/7 or l/35, depending on the polarization), as well as the instrumental factors, including the solid angle of photon collection, the detection efficiency and gain. The quadratic dependence of the second-order scattered light intensity on the fundamental
light
intensity is always experimentally observed. From this dependence, the quadratic coefficient I,,lG
1s
obtained.
N, is the number
density (the concentmtion in number of molecules per
cubic centimeter) of species with major hyperpolarizabiity simple two-component to a linear concentration
tensor component p,,,,.
For a
mixture of solute and solvent assuming the same symmetry, this leads dependence of 12w/Ii
as a function of
intercept is determined by the first hyperpolarizabiity,
N, of
the solute.
The
density and molecular weight of the
solvent, the slope by the concentration and the hyperpolarizability of the solute. Both contain the proportionality
factor G. When a value for the hyperpolarizability of the solvent is known,
this G can be calculated and used to obtain a value for the hyperpolarizability
of the solute, or
the other way around. This method effectively eliminates the need for local field correction factors at optical frequencies and is referred to as the internal reference method. hyperpolarizability
When the
of the solvent is not known, or when the solvent used is cenuosymmetric,
a
calibration with an external reference - with the appropriate local field correction factors - can be performed.
When solute and solvent, or unknown and reference, are of different symmetry, the averages of the products of the direction cosines can not be factor& out. They have to be taken into account when deducing a value for the hyperpolarizability harmonic scattered intensities.
from the relative second-
III. Experimental set-up and measurement procedure The originally developed instrument uses the high peak power pulses of a Q-switched Nd-YAG laser.
The intense infrared light pulses (8 ns, c 10 mI, 1064 nm) of an injection
seeded laser are focused in a small cell. The experiments are performed well below-threshold for other nonlinear
effects, such as stimulated
Brillouin
and Raman scattering.
The
fundamental light intensity is varied by means of a half-wave plate between polarizers, to check the quadratic dependence of HRS signal on IR intensity.
The second-order scattered light is
collected with a retroreflecting concave mirror and an aspheric condenser, discriminated against linear scattering by appropriate filters, and measured by gated integrators. procedure is computer-controlled.
The measurement
Insertion of an analyzing polarizer allows depolarization
measurements for the resolution into specific hyperpolarizability tensor components. A detailed description
of this nanosecond
version of the HRS instrument, including laser system and
modulation requirements, sample volume considerations and photon collection efficiency, has been given previously. l6 The special aspects of injection seeding and its advantages relevant for nonlinear
optical conversion
processes in general and hyper-Rayleigh
scattering
in
particular, have also been discussed. l7
With the advent of femtosecond conlinuous-wave mode-locked laser sources with high repetition
rate, hyper-Rayleigh
scattering experiments have become much more simple to
perform.
The 82 MHz pulse repetition rate of a self-mode-locked Titanium-doped
laser can for all practical purposes be considered quasi-continuous.
sapphire
Hence, we can think of this
laser as a source of continuous high power and increase the sensitivity with lock-in detection techniques.
The high peak power (1 Watt average power at 82 MHz in 80 fsec pulses gives
140 kWatt peak power) will broaden the femtosecond pulse by passing through optical elements with non-zero group velocity dispersion.
So-called femtosecond optics are thus
necessary in the femtosecond version of the HRS instrument.
The gated detection electronics
can be replaced by a chopper and a phase-sensitive detector. The intensity variation and photon collection is exactly the same as for the nanosecond version. The experimental details of the femtosecond version of the HRS instrument, including the special requirements for the optics, have been discussed recently. 18 The advantages of this system include the simpler, and hence cheaper, detection electronics, and the wavelength tunability.
139
IV. Octopolar molecules The first applications of the hyper-Rayleigh scattering technique were in the accurate determination of the solvent dependence of the hyperpolarizability values of dipolar molecules and in the sensitive measurement of the low values for some small saturated molecules.
This
enabled us to extend the Equivalent Internal Field model from conjugated monosubstituted benzene and stilbene derivatives to fully saturated molecules. l3 It was soon realized however, that HRS was also applicable to new classes of molecules that could not be measured with EFISHG. Ionic molecules are one example. lgv20 Another interesting class of molecules are the ones with an octopolar charge distribution.21
These octopolar molecules are characterized
by the absence of all vector-like properties, such as ground- and excited-state dipole moment, but they have a non-zero first hyperpolarizability.
However, before harmonic light scattering
emerged as an experimental tool to measure its value, the NLO properties of octopoles could not be studied on the molecular level, because the absence of a dipole moment also precludes EFISHG measurements.
The advantages of integrating nonpolar species for NLO applications
range from easier non-centrosymmenic total nonlinearity
crystallization, less dipolar aggregate formation, higher
(more hyperpolarizability
transparency trade-off.21
tensor components)
and better efficiency-
The major problem for device implementation
is the macroscopic,
ordering of apolar species in structures other than crystals. The familiar poling technique in polymer matrices is not applicable. One way of introducing order could be photo-assisted22 or all-optical poling.23
We have used hyper-Rayleigh hyperpolarizability
scattering
of the tricyanometbanide
for the determination
anion C[CN]S-.
of the first
For two reasons, this species
cannot bc measured by EFISHG: first, a charged ion will migrate in the field and no electric field can be established over the conducting solution and, secondly, an apolar molecule would not orient in the field. The potassium salt of cyanoform was synthesized following a known procedure24 and purified by crystallization. symmetry.
This highly polarizable anion is planar with D’jh
For this symmetry, all but four components of the hyperpolarizability
tensor are
zero, and they all have the same absolute value in the transparency regime. With the x-axis taken along a C-C-N bond direction and the z-axis perpendicular to the plane defined by the plane of the molecule, /3,
= - /?,
= - /3,
= - p,.
The value of this component was
determined in water, methanol, and ethanol. Methanol was used as the internal reference for the measurement in that solvent. Since methanol has another symmetry (approximately CSv) with other non-zero hyperpolatizability
components, a value for the pzZZ component
(0.26 x
lo-30 esu, with the z-axis along the C-O bond) was deduced by tensorial analysis, based on
140
quantumchemical
calculations.
The p._
value for the tricyanomethanide
anion in methanol
was found to be (7.0 f 1.5) x lo-30 esu at 1064 nm. Measurements in other solvents were referred to the measurement in methanol (external reference method). The p,
values for the
three solvents were identical within experimental error. The dielectric property of the solvent has little if no influence on the nonlinear optical properties of octopolar species. The-two-level model cannot be invoked to calculate a dispersion-free value for the hyperpolarizability, there is no (difference transparency
since
between the) dipole moment of ground- and excited state.
The
down to 300 nm ensures however that little if no resonance enhancement
is
observed.
This promising value of 7 x lo-30 esu for a small octopolar ion spurred the interest in this new class of molecules.
With the availability of a simple experimental
measure the hyperpolarizability
technique to
of these apolar molecules, more systematic and comparative
studies led us to step away from the strictly dipolar paradigm.25
V. Biological
chromophores
The study of the nonlinear optical properties of biological chromophores was prompted by the finding
of a very large NLO effect in the protein
Bacteriorhodopsin
(bR).26
Bacteriorhodopsin is the light-energy transducing protein present in the Purple Membrane of the bacterium Halobacterium Halobium.27-2g Under extreme conditions (oxygen deprivation), these halophilic bacteria can convert light energy to chemical energy (stored in adenosine uiphosphate,
ATP, molecules) through the establishment of a proton gradient over the Purple
Membrane.
Photoexcitation
protonation-deprotonation
of bR triggers a complex photocycle that involves a chain of from one side of the membrane to the other.
It is now firmly
established that the key element in the light absorption and the subsequent photocycle is the retinal chromophore.
This moiety is covalently linked to the protein backbone by a protonated
Schiff base linkage to the &-amino group of the Lysine-216 amino acid residue. Because of this unique photochemical received
considerable
behaviour and the excellent thermal and temporal stability, bR has attention
for potential
applications
in molecular
opto-electronic
The molecular hyperpolarizability of bR is unusually high and attempts have been made to measure its value using two-photon spectrosc~py~~~~~ and oriented poly(viny1 alcohol) ruatrice~.~~ With both these in&t
techniques, the actual value for the hyperpolarizabillty was
141
highly
dependent on the estimation of some critical parameters. Due to the presence of charged
amino acid residues on the protein surface, the more conventional Second-Harmonic scattering
Generation
was the natural
Electric-Field-Induced
(EFISHG) technique could not be used. technique
for the direct measurement
Hyper-Rayleigh of the molecular
hyperpolarizability of the protein, without any a priori assumptions.
The protein bacteriorhodopsin
(SIGMA) was solubilized in Triton X-100 (5% vol.) in
au acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0). The kinetics of the solubilization process have been studied in great detai1.37
It has been demonstrated
that this solubilization
finally results in one
monomeric protein molecule per one micelle of Triton X-1OO.38 The effect of the ongoing
30,000
25,000
0
20
40
60
80
Time (hours)
Fig. 1 : Time dependence of the hyperpolarizability of bR during the solubilization in Triton X-100 (5% vol.) in an acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0).
100
142
solubilization from oligomeric to monomeric form has a pronounced effect on the second-order scattered light, and, hence, on the effective value of the molecular hyperpolarizability. HRS intensity drops by a factor of 100 during the solubilization.
The
From the quadratic relation
between the second-order scattered light intensity and the hyperpolarizability. this intensity drop translates into a lo-fold drop in value for j.3. This is exemplified in Fig. 1. The data were taken with time intervals in the order of hours. The solid hue is a fit to the equation
Pqy= P*R(1+nexP - t/ Glrs1”
(6)
_-
a
0
I
I
I
I
20
40
60
80
time
100
(hours)
Fig. 2. Time dependence of the hydrodynamic diameter of the Triton X- 100 micelles with (squares) and without (circles) Bacteriorhodopsin.
143
The factor (1 + n exp
- f/‘cchs). (decaying to 1 upon complete solubilization)
takes into
account that at the onset of the solubilization bR is present as a mixture of oligomers, resulting from the slow decomposition of the purple membrane by the smfactant.
. The factor n thus
represents the initial degree of association. The relaxation time Zchrs for solubilization
of 37
hours, as determined by correlated HRS, is in good agreement with the time constant for solubilization obtained from quasi-elastic (linear) light scattering (Fig. 2). The micelle diameter d,# decreased according to
da
= dbR,sol
+ c
exp - ‘1~qds
(7)
A value of 36 hours was found for the decay time ZPers. The initial particle diameter d ea.0- dbR,sol + c = 17 nm determines the volume of the associated protein and surfactant molecules. The particle diameter found after complete solubiization, def,, = dbR.sol = 11 .S nm is in good agreement with previously reported values for bR in the same surfactant.39~40 The hyperpolarizability in good agreement
value found for bR after complete solubilization (2100 x lo-30 esu) is with the previously
reported values from two-photon
absorption
spectroscopy (2250 x lo-30 esu)34*35 and the value measured in oriented poly(viny1 alcohol) manices (2500 x lo-30 esu).36
In order to understand the high hyperpolarizability
of bR, a systematic theoretical and
experimental study of the NLO properties of various retinal derivatives was started. Since me hyperpolarizability is sensitive to the local electric field at the chromophore binding site, it was postulated that HRS on retinal derivatives would reveal information on the exact structure of the retinal binding pocket. The exact structure of this binding site is still subject to great uncertainty and in literature only modest agreement exists. interaction
It turned out, however, that a bulk solvent
could not simulate the highly specific chromophore-apoprotein
interactions.
Nevertheless, the measurements gave a lot of information on the influence of the molecular structure on the p value, when compared to quantum chemical calculations.
The experimental
and theoretical results are in excellent agreement for the effects of chain elongation nonlinearity-to-transparency
and
trade-off.
The first hyperpolarizability /3 of vitamin A acetate, retinoic acid, retinal Schiff base, retinal and protonated retinal Schiff base (PRSB), measured in methanol at 1064 nm, are given in Table I, along with the wavelength of maximal absorption and the two-level extrapolated values p0.
144
R
amax
(nm)
in MeOH
00
OICH
-If
3
ho64 (lo-30
PO esu)
( 10m30 esu)
in MeOH
in MeOH
326
140
80
351
310
160
365
470
220
380
730
300
445
3600
900
0 Vitamin A acetate
h
0 OYH
Retinoic acid
b
N’ Bu
Retinal Schiff base
AO Retinal
AN’
Bu A+
PRSB
Table I : Dependence of the experimental and static first hyperpolarizabiiity on the position of the absorption band maximum.
The observation that substituting the end gmup of the retinal polyene system for a more electron withdrawing group induces a bathochromic shift in the position of the absorption band maximum
was studied systematically
for the first time in 1967.41
After these early
considerations, a vast number of retinal derivatives have been prepared, especially for achieving a better understanding protonated
of the chromophore-apoprotein
Schiff base its characteristic
incorporated
in the bacteriorhodopsin
interactions
that give the retinal
absorption spectrum and photocycle
when it is
binding pocket.42 We have chosen for the tabulated
derivatives because of their commercial availability (SIGMA) and convenient wavelength of maximal absorption (326-445 nm).
The hyperpolarizability molecule
without
of retinal is higher than one would generally expect for a
a strong electron donor-acceptor
system.
Using quantum
chemical
calculations that take into account the polarity of the solvent, we have been able to demonstrate that this is due to the favourable degree of bond length alternation of the retinal polyene chain in polar solvents.26p43
Furthermore, the aldehyde group has been found to be a very efficient
electron acceptor for polyenes.44
The strong trade-off between nonlinearity and transparency, or the dependence of the hyperpolarizability contribution
on the position of the main absorption maximum confirms that the major
to the optical nonlinearity can be attributed to the first low lying, dipole allowed,
state. Quantum chemical calculations indeed show that the evolution of /3 is governed by the dipole moment variation between the two states and also by the position of the absorption band maximum Amax. For the protonated retinal Schiff base, these calculations also predict some two-photon resonance enhancement.45
The observed slope of a plot of log(&)/log(Amax)
is
7.7 and is to be compared with the slope of similar plots for benzene derivatives (4.4) and stilbene derivatives (8.7).8 Thus for a given ;Imax, the optical nonlinearity offered by retinal derivatives is intermediate between that offered by benzene and stilbene derivatives. disadvantage
A main
of these molecules is their instability when exposed to air and light for long
periods of time, which will limit their applicability in nonlinear optical devices.
The influence of the conjugation length on the hyperpolatizability is a recurring theme in second-order nonlinear optic~.~~~~~~~ An exponential increase of the hyperpolarizability the number
of double bonds has always been observed.
hyperpolarizability polyenes with 2,3,6
of /kyclocitral,
pionone,
We have measured
retinal and PApo-8’-carotenal.
and 10 double bonds, respectively.
with
the first
These are pure
146
The spectral properties of these molecules have been studied in detail to determine the nature of the electronic states of retinaL4*
The general similarity between the absorption
spectra of the polyenones, such as j%ionone, and the corresponding polyenals supports the fact that the hyperpolarizability polyenals.
of p-ionone can readily be compared to that of the other three
For j?-cyclocitral, the presence of a weak, but well-separated n-n* band is noted
below the onset of the main absorption band, that corresponds to the lAg-lBu four derivatives.
transition in the
Upon chain elongation, the n-rc* band is completely swamped by the
1Bu transition shifting to higher wavelengths.
1Ag-
As was the case for retinal, we expect this state
to give the largest contribution to pin the long and short chain derivatives.
2.55
Fig. 3. Transparency-nonlinearity
trade-off for all-tram derivatives in methanol.
The molecules are (with increasing /3 and &ax): Vitamin A acetate, Retinoic acid, Retinal Schiff base Retinal, PRSB.
2.65
147
The
observed exponential dependence of /I on the number of double bonds is given by
log(p) = 3.54 log(n) - 0.481 for the values at 1064 nm and log@)) = 2.35 log(n) - 0.248, where n is the number of double bonds in the polyene system, including the CO bond. The magnitude of the slope falls in the range of the observed slopes for the aw-diphenylpolyene derivatives, where 2 double bonds are counted for each phenyl unit. These derivatives were substituted with a strong electron donor-acceptor system and the magnitude of the slope was shown to be dependent
upon the nature of the end groups.
Because of the difference
in
counting schemes used and the different end groups, there is no simple way to compare these results.
It can be argued, however, that for a polyene system, substituted
electron donor-acceptor demonstrate
with a stronger
system the magnitude of the slope should be higher.
the superiority
This would
of the double bond to the phenyl ring for achieving
a large
hyperpolarizability.
C
Fig. 4: ~cyclocitml
(a), @ionone (b), retinal (c), and PApo-8’carotenal
Table II : Dependence of the experimental and static first hyperpolarizability on the number of double bonds in the polyene chain.
(d).
148
VI. Quantum colloids The properties of bulk material such as metals and semiconductors are determined by electrons that are not associated with individual nuclei as in single molecules.
The optical
nonlinearity in this class of materials is thought of as arising from the electronic characteristics of the bulk material. When a metal particle decreases in size, its properties deviate from those of bulk material and become size dependent. This phenomenon is referred to as the quantumsize effect. Many terms are used to describe these ultra small particles such as, quantum-dots, nanocrystals, Q-particles, clusters, etc. The particles in the quantum-size region show discrete large-molecule like electronic states that shift to higher energy with smaller particle size caused by charge carrier confinement.
This perturbation of the energy levels leads to new optical
properties that may find applications in the optical data processing field. There are two reasons for the choice of silver as the metal to study. surfaces are known to generate a second-harmonic
First, silver
signal in reflection. The first to report
second harmonic generation from a silver film was Brown. @ Wokaun subsequently observed SHG obtained
from silver island films50 and Bloembergen
harmonic generation
from metal surfaces.5l
started the study of second-
Since then considerable
progress is made in
understanding the nonlinear responses of simple metal surfaces5* In centrosymmetric approximation,
media there is no second-order optical response in the dipole
but at a surface or interface, where the inversion symmetry is broken, the
nonlinear susceptibility
is non vanishing in this approximation.
generated at the interface.
Thus a strong SHG signal is
Because of this surface sensitivity
SHG should be strongly
influenced by electronic properties localized at the interface, i.e. surface or interface states. On the other hand, quadrupole and higher-order terms may contribute to a bulk SHG response that may interfere with the surface response.
So both terms, the bulk and the surface response,
contribute to the induced nonlinear polarization of the medium, but their magnitudes and phases relative to each other are not known. The second reason for investigating silver particles is that the study of the enhancement of surface phenomena due to microscopic surface roughness53 included not only the SurfaceEnhanced-Raman-Spectroscopy enhancement
(SERS)54 but also other phenomena:
Chen observed an
of the SH signal when the silver surface was microscopic roughened.55
Even
more interesting was the measurement of a fifty-fold increase in the SH intensity of a silver surface covered with pyridine opposed to the SHG intensity observed in the absence of pyridine.56 With the I-IRS technique is it now possible to investigate whether these phenomena occur on silver colloid surfaces too.
149
All reagents used were of analytical grade and the aqueous solutions were prepared with distilled and filtered (milliQ system) water, The silver sols were prepared according to the method of Creighton by introducing
1mM silver nitrate (AgN03,
100mL) with vigorous
stirring into an ice-cold solution of 2 mhJ sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 300mL).57
The
yellow sol obtained was heated to about 60-62°C and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The colloids formed were stable (no precipitation or change in colour) over several weeks. The sols showed the characteristic single visible extinction band of silver particles near 400 nm, with little variation in the absorption curves depending on the particle sire. The size of the colloidal particles was determined with the Quasi-Elastic-Light-Scattering
(QELS) technique.58
The particles had a diameter in the range 20-35 run.
1,400
I
I
I
I
1200
1600
t
0
400
800
2000
fundamental intensity (a.u.) Fig 5. The enhancement of the HRS signal of silver colloids in the presence of pNA.
150
Figure 5 shows the results for the hyper-Rayleigh experiments on silver colloids. The open circles show the quadratic dependence for para-nitroaniline(RNA) at a concentration of 0.4 mM in water. The filled circles are for silver colloids with a diameter of 20 nm at a concentration
of 0.25 mM Ag in water. The triangles finally show the dependence
of the
hyper-Rayleigh signal at optical frequency 2w on the incident intensity at frequency o for paranitroaniline in the presence of silver colloids, both at the same concentration. increase of the SHG signal of pNA in the presence of silver colloids.
There is a clear
There are several
explanations for this effect. The simplest one is that the alignment of the pNA molecules upon adsorption on the silver colloid-surface
causes the increase in SHG.
The fact that pNA
molecules actually adsorb on silver colloids is shown in the absorption spectrum of the solution after the sol has coagulated and precipitated: there is in solution no pNA detectable. However, as SHG has been reported for centrosymmetric
molecules absorbed on silver surfaces, 5g the
alignment only could not explain for this enhancement. destabilization
There is also the possibility
of a
of the colloids upon adding pNA. The disturbing of the electric double layer
could result in a little aggregation of the colloids, but no significant change of diameter was found with QELS measurements. Other physical mechanisms for an enhancement originate either from the electrodynamic effect, associated with a localized surface-plasmon resonance, 60 or from the charge-transfer effect involving an electron transition between the molecule and the metal surface.6162
There is also an enhancement of the SHG signal observed by us of silver
colloids in the presence of pyridine. Which effect is responsible for the enhancement is not yet clear. The effect of the silver particle diameter on the SHG signal of silver colloids is shown in Fig. 6. There is a strong size-dependence of the second-harmonic intensity: when the particle diameter increases, the signal increases.
The fluorescence of the colloidal solution shifts
towards 532 nm above 35 nm particle diameter, disturbing the measurements
At this diameter
the quadratic dependence of the SHG signal on the incident beam is lost and becomes a thirdorder dependence.
Colloids with a 20-35 nm diameter are rather large to be called quantum-
dots and to exhibit quantum-size effects. However the surface plasmon is a collective excitation that is characteristic of solids, therefore its quantum-size effect is expected to occur at larger scales than those of atomic-based properties such as ionization energies or binding energies. Since the surface plasmon is a surface localized excitation, its intensity is roughly proportional to the surface area_63 This could explain the increase of the SHG signal.
The fmt results of actual measurements of the hyperpolarizabiity
of silver colloids are
shown in Fig. 7. To conduct these measurements it was necessary to use an external reference, pNA in methanol, as the hyperpolarizability of water is not known ($NA = 34 x lo-30 esu).
151
_
800
I
I
I
0
600 500 0 0
400 300 00
200 ??
100 0
??
0 25
I
I
I
I
27
29
31
33
35
diameter Ag-colldids (nm)
Fig. 6. The dependence of the quadratic coefficient in HRS on the particle diameter for the silver colloid particle.
As expected, the hyperpolarizability hyperpolarizability
of the colloids is dependent on their particle size. The
value for a colloid with 21 nm particle diameter amounts to (7 x 105) x lo-
30 esu per colloid particle, which becomes, with au average of 7 x 105 Ag atoms per colloid, a j3 of 1 x lo-30 esu per Ag atom in the colloid particle. The second-order nonlinear effect in these colloid particles is believed to be caused by defects, disturbing the symmetry of the colloids.
Hence, the hyperpolarizability
single atom. plasmons.
value cannot simply be divided down to a value per
The nonlinear scattering is a collective effect, very much the same as surface
Further measurements will be necessary to make any definite remarks on the size-
dependence of the hyperpolarizabiity
of silver colloids and on the importance of defects.
20
21
22 23 24 particle diameter (MI)
25
26
Fig. 7. The hyperpolarizabihty of the silver colloids with different sizes.
VII. Perspectives
We have demonstrated the wide applicability of the hyper-Rayleigh scattering technique: results were given for octopolar, biological and quantum-sized systems. The non-degenerate version of hyper-Rayleigh extension
scattering, with two different input frequencies,
of the existing technique.
In stead of the second-harmonic
is the natural
frequency
in the
degenerate case, sum and difference frequency are generated in parametric light scattering. This parametric
version of hyper-Rayleigh
determination of first hyperpolarizabities measurements.64
scattering can also be used for the experimental and has some specific advantages for depolarization
153
The wavelength-tunable
laser source for HRS, either the Optical Parametric Oscillator
(OPO) for the nanosecond version, or for example the Ti:sapphim laser with its femtosecond pulse train, opens the perspective for completely automated dispersion studies. The internal reference method will be very valuable, since the dispersion, i.e. the resonance enhancement of the larger, conjugated, solute molecule is in a wavelength region where the dispersion of the small, saturated solvent molecule is negligible. hyperpolarizability
An essentially dispersion-free value for the
of the solvent can then be taken as the reference over the wavelength range
of interest. Acknowledgements
Koen Clays is indebted to the Research Council of the University of Leuven for a postdoctoral fellowship.
Eric Hendrickx is a Research Assistant of the Belgian National Fund
for Scientific Research. This research is supported by grants from the Belgian (IUAP- 16) and Flemish government (EIT 1181) and from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FKFO 9.0012.92). References
1. P.A. Franken, A.E. Hill, C.W. Peters and G. Weinrich, Phys. Rev. Len. 7, 118 (1961). 2.
R.W. Terhune, P.D. Maker and C.M. Savage, Phys. Rev. L.&r. 14,681 (1965).
3. G. Mayer, C. R. Acad. SC. Paris 267B, 5457 (1968). 4.
B.F. Levine and C.G. Bethea, J. Chem. Phys. 63,2666 (1975).
5.
K.D. Singer and A.F. Garito,J. Chem. Phys. 75, 3572 (1981).
6.
G.R. Meredith, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 48 (1982).
7. C.J.P. Biittcher, The Reaction Field (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973). 8.
L.-T. Cheng, W. Tam, S.H. Stevenson, G.R. Meredith, G. Rikken and S.R. Marder, J.
Phys. Chem. 95, 10631 (1991).
9.
L.-t. Cheng, W. Tam, S.R. Marder, A.E. Stiegman, G. Rikken and C.W. Spangler.1.
Phys. Chem. 95, 10643 (1991).
10.
R.L. Schmitt and L.A. Rahn, Appl. Opt. 25,629 (1986).
11.
B. Zhou, T.J. Kane, G.J. Dixon and R.L. Byer, Opt. L&t. 10, 62 (1985).
12. T.J. Kane and R.L. Byer, Opt. Lett. lo,65 (1985). 13.
K. Clays and A. Persoons, Phys. Rev. Mt. 66,298O (1991).
14.
S.J. Cyvin, J.E. Rauch and J.C. Decius, J. Chem. Phys. 43,4083 (1965).
15.
R. Bersohn, Y.-H. Pao and H.L. Frisch, .I. Chem. Phys.45, 3184 (1966).
154
16.
K. Clays and A. Persoons, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63.3285(1992).
17. K. Clays, A. Persoons and L.De Maeyer, in Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 3 (Ed: M. Evans and S. Kielich, John Wiley dc Sons, Inc., ) pp. 455 (1994) 18.
K. Clays and A. Persoons, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65,219O (1994).
19.
T. Verbiest, E. Hendrickx, A. Persoons and K. Clays, Proc. Sot. Photo-Opt. Instrwn.
Eng. 1775, 206 (1992). 20.
H. Nakanishi,
X.M. Duan, S. Okada, A. Watanabe,
M. Matsudsa, K. Clays, A.
Persoons and H. Matsuda, Proc. Sot. Photo-Opt.Instrum. Eng. 2143, paper 05 (1994). 21.
J. Zyss, Nonlinear Opt. 1,3 (1991).
22.
Z. Sekkat and M. Dumont, Appl. Phys. B 54,486 (1992).
23.
f. Charra, F. Kajzar, J.-M. Nunzi, P. Raimond and E. Idiart, Opt. Lett. 18,941(1993).
24.
S. Trofimenko, E.L. Little and H.F. Mower, J. Org. Chem. 27,433 (1962).
25.
T. Verbiest, K. Clays, C. Samyn, J. Wolff, D. Reinhoudt and A. Persoons, J. Am.
Gem. Sot. 116,9320(1994). 26.
K. Clays, E. Hendrickx, M. Triest, T. Verbiest, A. Persoons, C. Dehu and J.-L. Braas,
Science 262, 1419 (1993). 27.
W. Stocckenius and R.A. Bogomolni, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 52,587 (1982).
28.
R.B. Birge, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1016, 293 (1990).
29.
D. Oesterhelt, C. Bratichle and N. Hampp, Quart. Rev. Biophys. 24,425 (1991).
30.
C. Braiichle, N. Hampp and D. Oesterhelt, Adv. Mat. 3,420 (1991).
31.
C. Braiichle, Appl. Opt. 31, 1834 (1992).
32.
T. Miyasaka, K. Koyama and I. Itoh, Science 255,342 (1992).
33.
Q.W. Song, C. Zhang, R. Gross and R. Birge, Opt. Lett. 18,775(1993).
34. R.R. Birge and C.-F. Zhang, J. Chem. Phys. 92,717s 35.
(1990).
R.R. Birge, P.A. Fleitz, A.F. Lawrence, M.A. Masthay and C.F. Zhang, Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst. 189, 107 (1990). 36.
J.Y. Huang, Z. Chen and A. Lewis, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 3314 (1989).
37.
N.A. Dencher and M.P. Heyn, FEBS Letters 96,322 (1978).
38.
J.A. Reynolds and W. Stoeckenius, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 2803 (1977).
39.
H.B. Osborne, C. Sardet and A. Helenius, Eur. J. Biochem. 44,383 (1974).
40.
M. Seigneuret, J.-M. Neumann and J.-L. Rigaud, J. Biof. Chem. 266, 10066 (1991).
41.
B. Rosenberg and T.M. Krigas, Photo&m. Photobiof. 6,769 (1967).
42.
T. Baasov and M. Sheves, Biochemistry 25,5249 (1986).
43.
K. Clays, E. Hendrickx and A. Persoons, accepted for publication in Nonlinear Opt.
(1994).
44.
S.R. Marder, C.B. Gorman. L.-T. Cheng and B.G. Tiemann, Proc. Sot. Photo-Opt.
Instrum. Eng. 1775, 19 (1992). 45.
E. Hendrickx,
K. Clays, A. Persoons,
C. Dehu and J.-L. Bredas, submitted
for
publication in J. Am. Chem. Sot. (1994). 46.
M. Barzoukas, M. Blanchard-Desce,
D. Josse, J.-M. Lehn and J. Zyss, Chgm. Phys.
133, 323 (1989). 47.
R.A. Huijts and G.L.J. Hesselink, Chem. Phys. Left. 126, 209 (1989).
48.
P.K. Das and R.S. Becker, J. Phys. Chem. 82, 2081 (1978).
49.
F. Brown, R.E. Parks and A.M. Sleeper, Phys. Rev. L.&t. 14, 1029 (1965).
50.
A. Wokaun, J.G. Bergman, J.P. Heritage, A.M. Glass, P.F. Liao and D.H. Olson,
Phys. Rev. B 24, 849 (1981). and P.S. Pershan, Phys. Rev. 128, 606 (1962).
5 1.
N. Bloembergen
52.
D.A. Koos, V.L. Shannon and G.L. Richmond, Phys. Rev. B 47,473O (1993).
53.
M. Moskovits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 783 (1985).
54.
M. Fleichmann,
55.
C.Y. Chen, A.R.B. decastro and Y.R. Shen, Phys. Rev. Left. 46, 145 (1981).
56.
C.Y. Chen, T.F. Heinz, D. Richard and Y.R. Shen, Phys. Rev. Left. 46, 101 (1981).
57.
J.A. Creighton, C.G. Blatchford and M.G. Albert, Trans. Farad. Sot. 75, 790 (1979).
58.
B.J. Beme and R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering (Wiley Interscience,
P.J. Hendra and A.J. McQuillan, Chem. Phys. L&t. 26, 163 (1974).
New York,
1975). 59.
T.F. Heinz, C.K. Chen, D. Richard and Y.R. Shen, Chem. Phys. Left. 83, 180 (198 1).
60. Y.R. Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (John Wiley, New York, 1984). 61. 62.
A. Otto, J. Timper and I. Pockrand, Phys. Rev. Left. 45,46 (1980). B. Park, M.S. Kim, Y.D. Kim, E.C. Jung and C.S. Jung, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 5080
(1993). 63.
F. Ouyang, P.E. Batson and M. Isaacson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15421 (1992).
64.
T. Verbiest, M. Kauranen and A. Persoons, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1745 (1994).