Journal of Pediatric Surgery APRIL 1994
VOL 29, NO 4
Separation
of Brachio-Thoraco-Omphalo-Ischiopagus Conjoined Twins By L. Spitz, M.D. Stringer,
E.M. Kiely,
Bipus
P.G. Ransley, and P. Smith
London, England l Separation of 3-year-old brachio-thoraco-omphalo-ishiopagus bipus conjoined twin girls is reported. Detailed preoperative assessment and a multidisciplinary approach were essential prerequistes to surgery. The difficulties of managing the extensive body wall defect resulting from separation are discussed. Despite the use of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal tissue expanders, a large area of prosthetic material was required to reconstruct the abdominal wall. Skin cover was achieved using a combination of meshed allogeneic skin, homograft split skin, and autologous cultured keratinocytes. One twin died in the early postoperative period, but the other has recovered well and is awaiting further rehabilitative treatment. Copyright 0 1994 by W.8. Saunders Company
INDEX WORDS:
Conjoined twins; tissue expansion.
T
HE MANAGEMENT of conjoined twins provides many dilemmas for the pediatric surgeon. This is particularly true if the twins are extensively joined and yet capable of independent existence. We report the separation of 3-year-old brachio-thoracoomphalo-ischiopagus bipus conjoined twins and focus on the difficulties of obtaining body wall closure in the presence of such an extensive union. CASE REPORT Conjoined twin girls were born in 1988, to a 2%year-old mother (gravida 4, para 3) after an uncomplicated pregnancy. They were diagnosed antenatally in early pregnancy and delivered by elective cesarean section at 38 weeks’ gestation, weighing 4.5 kg. There were no major neonatal problems, and after detailed radiological investigations they were discharged home, at 4 months of age. They were readmitted at 2% years of age when twin 2 required treatment for pneumonia. The twins were referred to the Hospital for Sick Children, London, in January 1992 for assessment of possible separation. The twins were healthy and intelligent; they were joined from the forearms and shoulder to the pelvis (brachiothoraco-omphalo-ischiopagus bipus) and faced each other obliquely at approximately 120” (Fig 1). Their conjoined circumference measured 78 cm. They had two independent, normal lower limbs, two normal upper limbs, and independently functioning but conjoined upper limbs. Twin 2 had a marked scoliosis. The perineum had the appearance of a single female, and the rectum was distended, with soft feces.
JournalofPediatric Surgery, Vol29, No 4 (April), 1994: pp 477-481
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Investigations Routine investigations were supplemented by detailed echocardiography, gastrointestinal contrast studies, total body magnetic resonance imaging, cystoscopy with retrograde studies, radioisotope scans (DMSA and technetium 99m-HIDA), electromyography (EMG) of the pelvic floor musculature, and visceral angiography. Orthopedic, physiotherapy, and psychological assessments were obtained. The results are summarized in Table 1, and Fig 2 shows the extent and complexity of the anatomic union.
Preoperative Preparation The investigations showed no anatomic bar to separation, and attention was then focused on the problems of abdominal wall and skin cover postseparation. Two l,OOO-mLSilastic tissue expanders (Dow Corning Corp, Midland, MI) were inserted into the peritoneal cavity via an upper midline abdominal incision.’ Two smaller expanders were positioned subcutaneously in the midline over the anterior and posterior chest wall. During the same operation, the fused forearms were divided, and a skin biopsy specimen was taken to provide autologous cultured keratinocytes for later use. During the next 10 weeks, the tissue expanders were regularly injected, achieving an intraperitoneal volume of 2,250 mL and an increase in abdominal girth from 54 cm to 80 cm. This was well tolerated, but supplementary nasogastric tube feeding was required because of anorexia and weight loss. The subcutaneous chest wall expanders became infected and were removed; however, 6 weeks before separation, a cervical subcutaneous tissue expander was inserted and successfully filled to 300 mL. One week before separation, a multidisciplinary planning meeting was held to rehearse all aspects of the operation and postoperative care. Considering the EMG findings, it was decided to leave twin 1 with the bladder and urethra and twin 2 with the anus and rectum.
From the Departments of Paediattic, Urologic, and Plastic Surge’?: The Hospital for Sick Children, London, England. Date accepted: April 22, 1993. Address reprint requests to M.D. Stringer, MD, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Clarendon Wing, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, England. Copyright 0 I994 by W.B. Saunders Company 0022-346819412904-OOOl$O3.OOlO
477
SPITZ ET AL
478
established.
The tissue expanders
were deflated
before
positioning
the twins in the prone
position. After separation of the upper arms, the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the back were incised in the midline. from the shoulder to the coccyx. The wound was covered with a sterile adhesive plastic drape before the twins were returned to the supine position. A midline incision was made from the shoulder to the pubis. After an initial exploratory laparotomy, the chest wall was divided. and the common pericardial envelope was bisected and reconstructed as separate pericardial sacs. The hepatic bridge was divided using ultrasonic dissection and diathermy, and hemostasis was achieved with sutures and fibrin sealant. Twin 2’s ileum was divided at the point of small bowel fusion and anastomosed to the proximal transverse colon. An initial attempt to preserve the ileocecal region failed: it was inadvertently devascularized because the unusual vascular anatomy was not fully appreciated. The ileum of twin 1 was preserved to the ileocecal valve and exteriorized as a terminal stoma. Most of the bladder was retained by twin I in continuity with the urethra. while a small segment adjacent to the left ureteric orifice was tubularized and exteriorized as a vesicostomy in twin 2. The uterus and vagina were bisected in the sagittal plane and repaired over Silastic stents. After ligation of multiple bridging vessels, complete separation of the twins was achieved. Two surgical teams were involved in the reconstructive phase of Table 1. Anatomic Findings
Musculoskeletal Separate, complete racic deformity
vertebral columns,
&fused
diaphragms;
each with hemipeivis; thoracic scoliosis
tho-
(twin 2);
bony fusion of scapular necks, pelves, & ribs; soft tissue union of conjoined
upper limbs Cardiovascular
Structurally
normal & separate hearts in a common
independent
pericardial
vena cavas & aortas; each aorta terminated
single common
sac;
as a
iliac artery; large single ileocolic artery from
SMA (twin 1) and single IMA from twin 2; hepatic, pelvic, & scapular bridging vessels with cross circulation Gastrointestinal Independent
small bowels united 20 cm proximal
valve; single large colon and rectum; anal sphincter
& puborectalis
slightly better contribution
innervation
from ipsilateral
to ileocecal of external
spinal cord, but
from twin 2 Hepatobiliary
Fusion and overlap of left hepatic lobes; normal, separate extrahe. patic portal venous & biliary systems & hepatic veins Genitourinary Single kidney in each, but pelvic position
in twin 1; separate ipsi-
lateral renal vessels and ureters; single bladder with two ureteric orifices; Fig 1.
Appearance of the conjoined twins at time of referral.
single urethra, vagina, & uterus; single pelvic ovary in
each, but extra ovary at lower pole of kidney in twin 2 Other
Separation On April 1, 1992 the twins were 3 years 7 months old and weighed 16.5 kg. Each was anesthetized. independent arterial and central venous access were obtained, and full monitoring was
Pancreas and spleen in each twin Abbreviations: teric artery.
SMA, superior mesenteric
artery; IMA, inferior mesen-
SEPARATION
OF CONJOINED
479
TWINS
to cardiopulmonary
resuscitation.
grafts were harvested.
During
and the twin died.
identify the cause of death, but the myocardium. cally normal. appeared
I required
Twin required
although histologi-
pale and poorly developed.
intensive therapy for 2 weeks. Her ureteric stent
replacement
tive problems
Split skin
the autopsy. it was not possible to
hy open cystotomy; however, her postopera-
were otherwise
confined
split akin was usefully applied wall. and the abdominal
to the wound.
to granulating
Homograft
areas on the chest
wound edges were approximated
by serial
tucks in the prolcnc mesh. Four weeks later, her abdominal drhisced,
and new prolcne
ingrowth of granulation subsequent
intense
mesh was applied.
wound
On this occasion,
tissue through the mesh was awaited,
wound
contraction
mesh. Sheets of autologous cultured
enabled
keratinocytes
excision
and
of the
were applied to
accelerate wound healing. The twin was discharged home 4 months after
separation
treutmcnt mrnt
(Fig
awaiting
and has since undergone
successful
lithotripsy
ot two small hladder calculi and further wound debride4).
She continues
readmission
to receive
physiotherapy
and
is
for a lower limb prosthesis and release of a
Icft elbow contracturc.
DISCUSSION
The
reported
incidence
of conjoined
twins is
150,000 to 1:200,000 births, and more than two thirds
are femalc.‘-J Despite their monozygotic origin, they may vary considerably in size, appearance, internal
Fig 2.
Diagrammatic
the operation.
Despite
a huge abdominal diaphragm,
illustration of the anatomic findings.
the tissue expansion, chest wall defects and
defect
remained
incisions. which enabled
the approximated
convex. In twin 1. a pectoralis medially to obtain further skin was applied Edinburgh, entially
repair
of the
ribs to become
England)
more
major muscle flap was transposed
chest wall coverage.
to exposed tissues. Prolene with a polythene
to close the
operating
(Fig 3). After
thoracic closure was achieved with the aid of lateral rib
abdominal
Meshed
allogeneic
mesh (Ethicon
Ltd.
liner was sutured circumfer-
wall
in each
twin.
time was IS hours, and the estimated
The
blood
total
Ioss was
1,800 ml..
Postoperative Results The twins were paralyzed and ventilated, sive care support. Twin 2 remained eral perfusion. teriorated
hyperpyrexia,
and coagulopathy.
and treatment
day. hypotension
(microbiological
de-
inotropic
cultures were
with steroids. On the third postoperative
developed.
line; an echocardiogram
which was unresponsive
showed an overloaded
tile left ventricle with no pericardial pulmonary
Her condition
despite aggressive fluid and blood replacement.
support. a change of antimicrobials negative),
and received full inten-
critically ill. with poor periph-
to adrena-
and poorly contrac-
effusion. Attempts
to measure
capillary wedge pressure were unsuccessful. The follow-
ing day. profound
hradycardia
developed,
which was unresponsive
Fig 3. Immediate postoperative appearance extensive abdominal and chest wall defects.
of twin 1. Note the
480
Fig 4. Appearances separation.
SPITZ ET AL
of the surviving twin’s wound 8 months after
anatomy, and personality.l*“Bj When separation is both anatomically feasible and nonurgent, the optimal time for surgery is probably during infancy.1,6,7 Later division, as in the present case, adds to the psychological and physical problems of separation, not least because there is an increase in postural deformities and a decrease in thoracic flexibility with age. The importance of detailed investigation and careful multidisciplinary assessment before separation cannot be overstated. In our case, magnetic resonance imaging provided excellent anatomic detail,x but angiography was an invaluable adjunct in precisely defining the vascular supply to the bowel and kidneys. Nevertheless, there were operative difficulties because the dual blood supply to the mobile single colon was not symmetrical; there was a dominant ileocolic supply from twin 1, and only one inferior mesenteric artery originated from twin 2. The body wall and skin defects resulting from separation posed the greatest challenge in the separation of these twins. A myocutaneous flap derived from either the common fused limb of ischiopagus tripus twins’,’ or from a nonsalvageable twin was not available. Prosthetic material has been used by others, but it has the associated complications of infec-
tion and dehiscence.5,6,“’ Relaxing incisions are associated with a prohibitive morbidity.lt,lz Successful expansion of the abdominal cavity by artificial pneumoperitoneum has been reported, but the final increase in abdominal girth was less than 20 cms13~‘J;in our case it was 26 cm. Subcutaneous tissue expanders have undoubtedly assisted primary skin closure in cases of thoracopagus twins.15,‘hZuker et al (1986) first reported the use of intraperitoneal tissue expanders in the separation of ischiopagus tetrapus twins, although the expansion achieved was insufficient to allow complete primary closure.h Our previous experience with abdominal tissue expansion confirmed the value of the intraperitoneal site,’ which was well tolerated by our patients. However, the same degree of expansion could probably have been achieved in 8 rather than 11 weeks, thus reducing the period of anorexia. Despite tissue expansion, the degree of union in this case demanded the extensive use of prosthetic material. Skin cover was aided by a variety of techniques, including the novel use of autologous cultured keratinocytes. The cause of death in twin 2 remains uncertain. The clinical picture suggested uncontrolled sepsis; however, all microbial cultures were negative, autopsy findings were not supportive, and there was no clinical response to broad spectrum antibiotics and antifungal agents. Adrenal insufficiency in conjoined twins However, in our case there was has been reported. I7316 no improvement with hydrocortisone, and the adrenal gland was found to be histologically normal at the time of autopsy. The thoracic closure was not unduly tight,7 and the echocardiographic findings were not indicative of such a problem. Myocardial insufficiency after separation is a possible cause. When conjoined, twin 2 had a consistently higher resting pulse rate than twin 1 and may have been partially dependent on twin l’s cardiac output. There were no preoperative studies of cardiac output or attempts to quantitate the degree of vascular shunting. Twin 1 is healthy and thriving 8 months after separation. She requires regular physiotherapy, currently to correct postural deformities, and in the future to encourage walking with an artificial limb. Additional surgery will be required to improve the function in her left arm. As with other ischiopagus twins who have survived separation, this twin may also need further treatment to establish full urinary continence.‘y,zO ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge the skill and dedication of their medical and nursing colleagues involved in the care of the twins. They also thank Professor I.M. Leigh of the Experimental Dermatology Laboratory, The Royal London Hospital, for providing the cultured keratinocytes.
SEPARATION
OF CONJOINED
481
TWINS
REFERENCES 1. Spitz L, Capps SNJ, Kiely EM: Xiphoomphaloischiopagus tripus conjoined twins: Successful separation following abdominal wall expansion. J Pediatr Surg 26:26-29, 1991 2. Hanson JW: Incidence of conjoined twinning. Lancet 2:1257, 1975 3. Edmonds LD. Layde PM: Conjoined twins in the United States, 1970-1977. Teratology 25:301-308, 1982 4. Hoyle RM: Surgical separation of conjoined twins. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:549-562,199O 5. Boles ET Jr. Vassy LE: Thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins: Successful surgical separation. Surgery 86:485-492. 1979 6. Zuker RM, Filler RM. Lalla R: Intra-abdominal tissue expansion: An adjunct in the separation of conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg21:1198-1200, 1986 7. O’Neill JA, Holcomb GW, Schnaufer L, et al: Surgical experience with thirteen conjoined twins. Ann Surg 208:299-312, 1988 8. Richardson RJ, Applebaum H, Taber P, et al: Use of magnetic resonance imaging in planning the separation of omphalopagus conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 24:683-684, 1989 9. Mestel AL, Golinko RJ, Wax SH. et al: Ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins: Case report of a successful separation. Surgery 69:75-83, 1971 10. Hisano K, Nakamura K, Okada M. et al: Separation of conjoined twins using chest wall prosthesis. J Pediatr Surg 24:928929, 1989
11. Peterson CG, Hill AJ Jr: Separation of conjoined thoracopagus twins. Ann Surg 152:717-729. 1960 12. She YX. Li ZC. Song LC, et al: Successful separation of xipho-omphalopagus twins. Z Kinderchir 40:237-240. 1985 13. Eades JW, Thomas CG Jr: Successful separation of ischiopagus tetrapus conjoined twins. Ann Surg 164:1059-1072, 1966 14. Hung WT. Chen WJ, Chen HT, et al: Successful separation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 21:920-923, 1986 15. Ricketts RR, Zubowicz VN: Use of tissue expansion for separation and primary closure of thoracopagus twins. Pediatr Surg Int 2:365-368,1987 16. Elias DL, Baird WL, Zubowicz VN: Applications and complications of tissue expansion in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg26:15-21, 1991 17. Aird I: The conjoined twins of Kano. Br Med J 1:831-837, 1954 18. Diaz JH. Furman EB: Perioperative management of conjoined twins. Anesthesiology 67:965-973, 1987 19. Hoyle RM, Thomas CG Jr: Twenty-three-year follow-up of separated ischiopagus tetrapus conjoined twins. Ann Surg 210:673679, 1989 20. Shapiro E. Fair WR, Ternberg JL, et al: lschiopagus tetrapus twins: Urological aspects of separation and IO-year follow up. J Ural 145:120-125. 1991