- Email: [email protected]
Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies
SMALES AND ETEMADI
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
6. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:161-7. 7. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-6. 8. Wat P, Cheung GS. Incidence of post-operative sensitivity following indirect porcelain onlay restorations: preliminary results. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1995;3:3-7. 9. Sorensen JA, Choi C, Fanuscu MI, Mito WT. IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:130-6. 10. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61. 11. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:229-31. 12. Anusavice KJ. Dental ceramics. In: Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, editors. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 655-719. 13. Kra¨mer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after 4 years—a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-31. 14. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:619-26. 15. Broderson SP. Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:535-9. 16. Etemadi S, Smales RJ, Drummond PW, Goodhart JR. Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin-bonded porcelain restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:691-7. 17. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76. 18. McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dent Update 2001;28:84-90.
Noteworthy Abstracts of the Current Literature
19. Hannig M, Schmeiser R. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997;28:79-83. 20. Dailey B, Gateau P, Covo L. The double-inlay technique: a new concept and improvement in design. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:624-7. 21. Albers HF. Ceramometal bonded inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:122-30. 22. Sewitch T. Resin-bonded metal-ceramic inlays: a new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:408-11. 23. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC, Lee RB. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 109-14. 24. Dixon WJ, editor. BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981. p. 555-75. 25. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981. p. 212-36. Reprint requests to: DR. SOHEILA ETEMADI DEPARTMENT OF DENTISTRY SHAHED UNIVERSITY KESHAVARZ BLVD, ITALIA ST. TEHRAN, IRAN FAX: 0098-21-896718 E-MAIL: [email protected] 0022-3913/$30.00 Copyright ª 2004 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.011
Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies Fondriest J. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23: 467-79.
Closely matching natural teeth with an artificial restoration can be one of the most challenging procedures in restorative dentistry. Natural teeth vary greatly in color and shape. They reveal ample information about patients’ background and personality. Dentistry provides the opportunity to restore unique patient characteristics or replace them with alternatives. Whether one tooth or many are restored, the ability to assess and properly communicate information to the laboratory can be greatly improved by learning the language of color and light characteristics. It is only possible to duplicate in ceramic what has been distinguished, understood, and communicated in the shade-matching process of the natural dentition. This article will give the reader a better understanding of what happens when incident light hits the surface of a tooth and give strategies for best assessing and communicating this to the dental laboratory.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.
JUNE 2004
553 YMPR409-413_proof 28 May 2004 1:56 am
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
6. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:161-7. 7. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-6. 8. Wat P, Cheung GS. Incidence of post-operative sensitivity following indirect porcelain onlay restorations: preliminary results. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1995;3:3-7. 9. Sorensen JA, Choi C, Fanuscu MI, Mito WT. IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:130-6. 10. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61. 11. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:229-31. 12. Anusavice KJ. Dental ceramics. In: Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, editors. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 655-719. 13. Kra¨mer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after 4 years—a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-31. 14. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:619-26. 15. Broderson SP. Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:535-9. 16. Etemadi S, Smales RJ, Drummond PW, Goodhart JR. Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin-bonded porcelain restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:691-7. 17. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76. 18. McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dent Update 2001;28:84-90.
Noteworthy Abstracts of the Current Literature
19. Hannig M, Schmeiser R. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997;28:79-83. 20. Dailey B, Gateau P, Covo L. The double-inlay technique: a new concept and improvement in design. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:624-7. 21. Albers HF. Ceramometal bonded inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:122-30. 22. Sewitch T. Resin-bonded metal-ceramic inlays: a new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:408-11. 23. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC, Lee RB. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 109-14. 24. Dixon WJ, editor. BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981. p. 555-75. 25. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981. p. 212-36. Reprint requests to: DR. SOHEILA ETEMADI DEPARTMENT OF DENTISTRY SHAHED UNIVERSITY KESHAVARZ BLVD, ITALIA ST. TEHRAN, IRAN FAX: 0098-21-896718 E-MAIL: [email protected] 0022-3913/$30.00 Copyright ª 2004 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.011
Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies Fondriest J. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23: 467-79.
Closely matching natural teeth with an artificial restoration can be one of the most challenging procedures in restorative dentistry. Natural teeth vary greatly in color and shape. They reveal ample information about patients’ background and personality. Dentistry provides the opportunity to restore unique patient characteristics or replace them with alternatives. Whether one tooth or many are restored, the ability to assess and properly communicate information to the laboratory can be greatly improved by learning the language of color and light characteristics. It is only possible to duplicate in ceramic what has been distinguished, understood, and communicated in the shade-matching process of the natural dentition. This article will give the reader a better understanding of what happens when incident light hits the surface of a tooth and give strategies for best assessing and communicating this to the dental laboratory.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.
JUNE 2004
553 YMPR409-413_proof 28 May 2004 1:56 am