Significance of the Δ5 and Δ4 steroidogenic pathways in the hamster preovulatory follicle

Significance of the Δ5 and Δ4 steroidogenic pathways in the hamster preovulatory follicle

3199 641 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE A5 AND A4 STEROIDOGENIC PATHWAYSIN THE HAMSTERPREOVDIATORYFOLLICLE Anastasia Makris, Dian Olsen and Kenneth J. Ryan Labo...

490KB Sizes 2 Downloads 50 Views

3199

641 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE A5 AND A4 STEROIDOGENIC PATHWAYSIN THE HAMSTERPREOVDIATORYFOLLICLE Anastasia Makris, Dian Olsen and Kenneth J. Ryan Laboratory of Human Reproduction and Reproductive Biology Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Received 12-19-83 ABSTRACT

Isolated hamster granulosa cells and theta from preovulatory follicles were incubated in vitro for 2 and 6 h in the absence/or presence of LH and steroidyubstrates. The purpose of the experiments was to determine, in theta, the relative activities of the A5 and A4 pathways under controlled conditions, and to compare the ability of' granulosa cells form progesterone from exogenous and theta to pregnenolone. The results of the experiments show that the Aspathway in theta predominates before and up to 2 h after LH stimulation. The delayed effect of LH after 2 h is a switch from A3 to A4 as the major Progesterone formation from exogenous pregnenolone metabolic pathway. is 7 to 10 times greater in unstimulated granulosa cells than in theta. Acute effects of LH lead to increased conversion of exogenous pregnenolone to progesterone in granulosa cells but not theta. LH does, however, acutely stimulate the thecal conversion of DHEA to androstenedione. The longer term effect of LH in both cell types is to increase pregnenolone conversion to progesterone. INTRODUCTION We

have

previously

(4-pregnene-3,20-dione) the

following

progesterone

isolated after by

initial

studies (O-5

the h)

is

inhibition.

cells

follicle first not The

progesterone synthesis

(1).

in

appears

sensitive

In

(2,3).

LH stimulated

acute

either

In

prevent

The temporal

characteristics

these

studies

are parallel

to the acute

TmEOXDI

the

intact

or

by LH-stimulated 4-6 h

synthesis

10 h time

progesterone

5 h.

S

in

progesterone

after

Volume 42, Number 6

has acute

by RIA until

puromycin

however,

tissue

CAMP-stimulated

synthesis

addition,

progesterone

follicular

seen only

biphasic

to

inhibitors,

is

or

vitro

is not measurable

(1).

phase of

LH-

progesterone

or theta

--in

hamster

15 min)

2)

LH stimulation

intact

I)

(with in

follicle

that

by the

characteristics.

granulosa

the

synthesis

synthesis

recombined

reported

or

course

synthesis

cycloheximide

accumulation of follicular

of

progesterone response

December 1963

to

Lli

and

granulosa are to

the

cells

or

dependent the

delayed

on using

in

various

investigators

respective (5-14)

result

of

by

metabolized

finally

for

up

an

to

steroidogenesis

the

h after

than

theta

from

the

acute the

the in

the

A5pathway; LH

surge

term

3) are,

synergism

(or

--in

A4

granulosa

a

ideas:

1)

vitro

LH

steroidogenic which

follicle

to progesterone LH

is

report

cells

on a per

of

this

pregnenolone

pregnenolone effect

the

follicular

in

A5 than of

of

and

following

surge

synthesis

LH

conve,,rsion

the

LH

to

observations

presented

test

active

converting

longer a A5to

cells

particular

that

data

to

a more

via

4-6

partial

The

after

androgens

granulosa

in

theory

designed

LH stimulates

prior

synthesis

pa th*ay s

and,

the

cells.

have

efficient 4)

granulosa

theta

to

and

steroidogenic

test

just

(3S-hydroxy-5-pregnen-ZO-one)

immediately the

2)

to

experiments

and

stimulation),

us

observations

isolated

The reported

ovarian,

pregnenolone

from

to

pathway;

led

isolated

progesterone

theta

synthesis.

in

These

tissue

follicle

between

terone

systems

thecal

.derived

prior

more

hamster

when

(4).

concerning

have

progesterone

and

of

seen

LH (1).

follicle surge

progea

enzyme

tissue

with

preovulatory

response

acute

synthesis

stimulated

gonadotropin

a synergistic

resulting

are

are

characteristics

implies

to

theta

preovulatory The

progesterone

is

to

direct

is

before basis, and thecal

a A4 pathway.

MATERIALS

AND METHODS

Adult LAK:LVG (SYR) hamsters (Lakeview Hamster Colony) were sacrificed at proestrus prior to the preovulatory LH surge (4). Reproductive cycles were established by vaginal smears (5). Preovulatory follicles were dissected (average 8/pair of ovaries), cleaned and pooled. The follicles were used intact or dissected as previously described (1) to obtain isolated theta and granulosa cells. Each incubation vessel in all the experiments contained either 1 follicle, theta from 1 follicle, or granulosa cells from 1 follicle (approximately 50,000 cells).

The tissue was incubated in 12 x 75 mm tubes containing 1 ml of McCoy’s medium (Grand Island Biological), 1% w:v BSA (Sigma). The tubes were placed in a 37’C Dubnoff water bath operating at 60 cycles/min. The incubation time varied with the experiment. Specific experiments called for addition to the incubation medium of LH and/or radioactive or non-radioactive steroids. The LH was human LH LER (960) kindly donated by Dr. Leo Reichert, National Institutes of Health. Non-radioactive steroids used in the incubations were pregnenolone and DHEA (30-hydroxy-5.-androsten-17-one). They were obtained from Sigma Chemical an9 purified prior to use by celite chromatography. Pregnenolone [7- H(N)] (lo-25 Ci/mmol) was obtained from New England Nuclear, purified prior to use by celite chromatography and diluted with non-radioactive pregnenolone to specific activities that were dependent on the dose added to the incubation vessels. At the end of the incubation period, the incubates were sonicated, and frozen at -2O’C until extracted for steroids. Non-radioactive steroids were extracted from the medium and tissue by ether and analyzed quantitatively by radioimmunoassay after celite chromatography. The extraction, separation, and radioimmunoassay of progesterone and androstenedione (4-androstene-3,17-dione) have been previously described (1). Separatio;i’ of pregnenolone and DHEA by celite chromatography was done by applying the samples in 1 ml trimethylpentane (TMP) to the column. Pregnenolone is eluted with progesterone using 4.5 ml TMP. DHEA eluted with 4 ml 5% ethylacetate in TMP (after an additional 5 ml TMP was added and the eluate discarded). Pregnenolone was measured by radioimmunoassay using Ab #ll developed by Ms. Roberta Todd at the LHRRB RIA Core facility. This antibody has a cross reaction of 14% with progesterone. The quantitative determination of both progesterone and pregnenolone in the same fraction was adjusted to account for cross reactivities of the respective antibodies. DHEA was measured by RIA using Ab 1111 also developed by the RIA core facility. This antibody has 0% cross reactivity with testosterone (17g-hydroxy-4-androsten -3-one) which elutes with DHEA off the celite column. 3 H-pregnenolone the remaining When was used as a substrate, radioactive substrate and radioactive products, progesterone (PI, A4-A, DHEA , DHT (17R-hydroxy-5 u-androstan-3-one) and testosterone (T), were separated using the following protocol. The samples were extracted with ethyl dried and reconstituted with a 1:l methylene ether, chloride:ethanol mixture. Samples were applied to scored silica gel plates (Analab) along with standards of the 6 steroids (on channels separate from the unknowns). The plates were run 2X in a 9:l chloroform:ether mixture. The channels with the standards were sprayed with 0.001% Direct Yellow 59 (Sigma) and the steroid zones located under uv. The silica gel: chloroform:ether sys tern isolated progesterone A4-A and T. Pregnenolone, DHT and DHEA co-eluted. This zone of co-eluted steroids was scraped into test tubes containing ethanol. The steroid mixture was separated from the silica gel by centrifugation and applied to aluminium oxide plates (Analab). The plates were run 2X in a 1: 1 cyclohexane:ethyl acetate system which separated the three steroids. The respective steroid zones were located using standards applied to separate channels, which were sprayed with 0.001% Direct Yellow 59 and inspected under UV light. The zones containing the isolated steroid fractions were scraped off into scintillation vials containing 8 ml HP

The amount of radioactivity was converted to Liquifluor (Beckman). since the specific activity of each dose of the nanograms 0 steroid, f substrate ( H-pregnenolone) used was different. Where applicable the data were analyzed statistically using ANOVA. RESULTS De

Production

Novo

Theta

and Granulosa Isolated

without in

of

plus

detectable 0.001).

the

other

LH (Table

groups

Table 1. progesterone cells --in vitro

showed

Control LH (100

that levels

progesterone produced

Preg

was

theta

were

Analysis only of

incubated

by the

RIA

DHEA by

for

of

the

Isolated

in any

(P<

of

the

pregnenolone

Prog

+ 240

2 h with

content

theta

produced

0.001)

groups,

and

DHEA

and none .

or DHEA.

(pg)

and

steroid

LH-stimulated

pregnenolone,

found

detectable

(pg)

ND1 13390

rig/ml)

Granulosa

and

De novo synthesis of pregnenolone (Fog>, and DHEA by isolated theta and in 2 h incubations + LH, n = 5.

Theta Control LH (100

and 1).

significant

No

Progesterone

2 LH in Two Hours cells

tissue

and

(P<

Cells

granulosa

100 rig/ml

media

Pregnenolone,

(preg), granulosa

DHEA (pg)

ND ND

ND *382

ND ND

ND ND

+ 46

cells ND ND

rig/ml)

Each incubate consisted of either isolated granulosa cells (50,000 cells) or theta from one preovulatory follicle. The steroids were measured by RIA and the results analyzed by ANOVA. The steroid measurement indicated by an asterisk (*> is fignificantly different from the respective control (P< 0.01). ND = non-detectable levels Pregnenolone

Conversion

to

Progesterone

by

Isolated

Theta

7Cells The conversion

of

exogenous

non-radioactive

pregnenolone

and

Granulosa

of

s (doses

of

10 to

1000

of

isolated

incubations LH was added

rig/ml)

at

To

to

To

to

the

2

at

to

progesterone

theta

added

(Fig.

both

the

h

645

TDEOXDI

was

1A)

2 and

incubations

and

determined

granulosa

in cells

6 h incubations. and

at

To

2 and (Fig.

6 h 1B).

Substrate

plus

4 h to

was

the

6 h

incubations. Thecal plus/minus seen

conversion LH

by

was

control

pregnenolone

measurable of

stimulate

progesterone 1B)

but

incubations

significantly

(Fig.

of

in

the

(Fig.

approximately

granulosa thecal

2 h incubations

IA)

cells

1A)

but

2 h

7-10X

lower

(Fig.

conversion

(Fig.

in

of did

so in

1B).

incubations than LH did

that not

pregnenolone granulosa

to cells

(P< 0.05).

25

I

IO

Fig.

1.

I

20

I

I

I

I

50 100 250 500 Pregnenolone nghnl

I

1000

Dose-response conversion of exogenous pregnenolone rig/ml) to progesterone in the absence or presence rig/ml) in 2 and 6 ,h incubations. Control: 2h0, 6ha 2h@ , 6h n . n=A. A: theta; B: granulosa cells.

(10-1000 of LH (100 . LH:

S Theta higher

that

(P<

had

0.01)

progesterone

all

was essentially

incubations

+ LH (Fig.

To

10 to TO

1000

plus

taken

conversion

of

in

the

index DHEA

of LH to

6

same as

at

significantly

To plus

4 h)

to

6

h

1A). granulosa

that

seen

cells in

the

in

respective

2 h

2 and 6 H Incubations for

degree

in

both

stimulate

2 and

DHEA was added

at

To

of 2 h

the

DHEA and

to

the

doses

of

200

LH added

ranging

2 h incubations,

amount

of

A4-A

A"

LH

6 h incubations

loo

Dose-response conversion of A4 -A by isolated theta in rig/ml). Control: 2h0, 6h 0.

at

conversion.

accumulation

60

6 h + 100 rig/ml

added

The

DHEA

2.

(Fig.

h incubations.

of

20

Fig.

(added

by

incubated

DHEA was

to

6 h showed

2B).

were

rig/ml.

an

10 rig/ml

Non-radioactive

2).

4 h as

ability

theta

(Fig

pregnenolone

the

DHEA by Theta

Isolated at

above

LPI for

dose-response

incubations

of

with

of

doses

pregnenolone

Conversion

incubated

conversion

at

The

been

?FBEOXDrn

6ClCl

and

-A

fo&d

at was

stimulated (P<

from

from

the

0.05).

DHEA at

The

2 h is

COO

rig/ml

exogenous DHEA (10-1000 2 and 6 h incubations LH: 2h0, 6hm.

rig/ml) to + LH (100

in

contrast

theta

to the unchanged

(Fig.

This

Dose-response

experiment

of

in Thecal

of

the A5

into

and A'

3H-pregnenolone

were

(2200 used.

ratios.

2 summarizes The amounts

translated

to

use d .

substrate essentially It

total

ratio

in

both

7.61,

indicating

the A5 rather

6

0.07

to

significantly towards

theA

h

than through

pathway,

calculated

specific

theta

groups

10 rig/ml (2200 at

were

(11,000 CPM/rig)

To and To +

DHEA/progesterone T and DHT found were

activity data

varied (not

levels.

A4 pathway

groups

direction

are

not

in DHEA,A4 -A, T,

of

was over 1 (1.3

3H-pregnenolone

the

to

through

.

had DHEA/progesterone

that

increasing

shown)

dose

The DHEA/progesterone groups

metabolism

the

with

2 h incubates.

and LH-stimulated

indicating the

3H-pregnenolone

rig/ml

was added

incubation

a preferential

change

1000

the

relative

and LH-stimulated

DHEA, A4 -A,

progesterone

2 h control

the

Isolated

LH at 2 h caused an increase

affecting

0.24

and

and the

from the control

The 6 h LH-stimulated from

data

because

Control

can be seen that

and DHT without

from

whether

respectively.

progesterone,

ng,

different

of

Doses of

The substrate

the

of

groups.

CPM/rig)

4 h to the 2 and 6 h incubates Table

determine

formed

2 h control

groups,

rig/ml

to

function

(a

pathways)

and LH-stimulated

100

,

order

of time of LH exposure.

4 treatment

and 6 h control

in

products

would change as a function .

CPM/rig)

in LPI-stimulated

Tissue

was performed

DHEA/progesterone

activities

divided

accumulation

1 and Table 1).

a-Pregnenolone

ratio

progesterone

longer of

term

ratios LH effect

3H-pregnenolone

the accumulation

ranging was to

metabolism

of progesterone.

Conversion Table 2. androstenedione (A4-A), DHEA by isolated theta.

Substrate n=5

P (rig/ml)

3H-pregnenolone to progesterone (PI, of testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and CONTROL(2 H) A4 -A

DIBA

T

DHT

DHgAf P

ng

10

0.15 0.11

0.24 0.15

0.06 0.17

0.05 0.06

0.33 0.13

1.54 1.33

100

0.65 0.62

1.73 2.38

1.57 3.50

0.73 1.64

3.70 1.16

2.66 3.83

1.90 11.90 5.14 14.70 3.36 10.10 8.80 16.10 ____-------------------------------------------------------------LH (2 HI 10 0.16 0.44 0.27 0.28 0.22 0.38 0.34 0.15

17.36 11.00

6.26 3.00

0.44 0.57

2.68 1.72

1000

100

0.78 1.61

3.10 4.80

12.70 6.10

2.10 3.34

1000

3.82 5.84

29.00 25.90

15.80 30.00

37.10 94.10

17.80 16.70

7.59 4.43

10

2.12 2.10

0.25 0.15

0.63 0.42

0.19 0.19

0.12 0.07

100

7.50 9.04

1.23 2.21

9.49 4.69

1.23 2.22

' 0.16 0.24

82.30 6.77 175.59 103.87 113.31 13.66 45.58 103.62 -------------------------------------------------------------------

8.21 3.30

0.08 0.12

LH (6 HI 0.52 0.69 9.39 22.60

1000

lost 10s t

3.97 2.98

.

Incubation of'the tissue was 2 or 6 h. LH was added at T . The substrate was added at T and T + 4 h to the 2 h and tf?e 6 h incubations, respectively. ' The radioactivity found was transposed to reight of steroid product (ng). Specific activities of the H-pregnenolone were 11,000 CPM/rig for 10 ngfml, and 2200 CPM/rig for 100 and 1000 rig/ml. Each dose/group consisted of only 2 incubation samples. The data derived from each sample is shown.

DISCUSSION The results that

phase 1

(acute)

of

the

experiments

synergistic

reported

progesterone

here synthesis

support

the

theory

by the hamster

follicle

depends

granulosa

cells.

Table

on thecal

1 shows

novo pregnenolone incubations. the

that

The probability

Both

de nova --

granulosa

non-stimulated

preferentially

with

synthesized

cells)

is

theta

and

prolonged

effect

from

which

0.07

resulted

to

0.24

in

ratios

progesterone

(1).

A5

(in

pathway

the data

2

h to

greater

the

synthesis

LH

DHEA

as

of

in Table of

2.

with

than 1.

activity

ratios

de nova --

be

shown in Table

for

significant

DHEA/progesterone

and significant

under

will

of values

2 h

of androgens

3H-pregnenolone

induce

LH was to

in

-de

in

pregnenolone

incubated

theta

exogenous

by the DHEA/progesterone

thecal

by

synthesize

of progesterone

thecal

the

indicated

indicated

pathway,

LH will

no detectable

through

metabolized

of

to progesterone

showed an accumulation

metabolized

of

with

no accumulation

conditions

that

conversion

stimulated

studies

same experimental

absence

theta

and DHEA with

Earlier

preferentially

pregnenolone

The

the A4 2 ranging

progesterone

by 4 to 6 h (1). Whether. the hamster synthesis

novo

oxidoreductase higher evidence

that

a

whether for

the

that

(13).

amount of cellular

A5

A4 pathway

the

associated associated

with with

(16).

existing newly active

than

DHEA is

not

has an altered known.

a pregnenolone-specific

e

-al.

found

cholesterol They

microsomal

structures

LH-stimulated

There

can be found that

that

LH can

and the

in

bovine

redirect

tissue

the A5

mitochondrial

is

and a separate

in follicular

found

due to -de

3l3-hydroxysteroid

enzyme system

oxidoreductase

Dimino

significant t0

existing

both

3l3-hydroxysteroid

tissue

becomes more significant

pregnenolone-specific

pregnenolone

indicates

DHEA-specific ovarian

of or

affinity

A4 pathway

from the

pathway

A4 pathway structures.

a

was was

Evidence

of

LH-stimulated

oxidoreductase

has

investigators rabbit

The and

undergoes

also

3P-hydroxy

a A5

was

stimulate

to not

thecal

stimulatory

effect

incubated

the

with

has

have

same acute

exogenous

cell

sys terns.

in theta,

and

of

post-coital

theta

6

(Fig.

incubations

was

conversion

of

seen to

LH

in

to progesterone

on theta h

1A

respective

effect

acute

effect

(Fig.

the

conversion

the

the

groups

the

in

The

however,

DHEA and

that

differences

pregnenolone

LH on

several

(21).

increase the

by

shown

LH on granulosa

conversion of

also

shift

tase

3g-hydroxysteroid

tissue

possible

oxidoreduc

LH did

1B).

ovarian

A4

of

indicates

cells

in

to

effect

steroid

granulosa

did

shown YoungLai

differential

1B)

(Fig.

been

(17-20).

ovary

associated

mitochondrial

when

1A) but An

acute

theta .

were

A4 -A measured

(Fig.

2).

Comparison and

granulosa

shows

than

(Fig.

seen

rabbit

relative

by

during where

thecal

significantly

of

to

convert

by

granulosa

theta.

between

LH stimulation

was increased

ability

1B)

granulosa

differences

6 h incubations

relative

accumulation

that

pre-coital

the

cells

progesterone

higher

after

of

and

theta

cells found

theta

and

conversion

but of

(Fig.

to

the

(Fig.

1A)

progesterone,

an order

(21).

granulosa

2 h incubations

(P< 0.01)

theta

pregnenolone

YoungLai

cells

unstimulated

of magnitude

same differences In

our

cells were

pregnenolone

studies, were

not

in

maintained

evident to

the

in

the

progesterone

1A and 1B).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This

work

was supported

by a grant

from

the

National

Institutes

of

Child Health and Human Development, ROl HD 14709-0181. thank the LHRRB RIA core facility, under the direction Todd for providing RIA materials and facilities.

We

would like to of Ms. Roberta

REFERENCES 1. Makris, A. and Ryan, K.J., Endocr. Res. Comm. 4(3+4), 233 (1977). 2. Makris, A. and Ryan, K.J., Abstr. # 29, 6th International Congr. on Hormonal Steroids, Jerusalem, Israel, 5-10 Sept., 1982. 3. Makris, A. and Ryan, K.J., (19831, submitted to Endocr. Res. Comm.. 4. Turgeon, J.and Greenwald, G.S., Endocrinology 90, 657 (1972). 5. Gougeon, A., Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochem. xophys. 1087 17(6), (1977). 6. Pupkin, M., Bratt, H., Weisz, J., Lloyd, C.W. and Balogh, K., J. Endocrinology 79, 316 (1976). 7. Bjersing, L., sstochemie l0, 295 (1967). 8. Ikonen, M., Niemi, H. Pesonen, S., and Timonen, S., Acta Endocr. (Kbh) 38, 293 (1961). 9. Rubin, B.L., Hamilton, J.A. and Driks, E.C., Endocrinology 2, 924 (1963). 10. Blaha, G.C. and Leavitt, W.W., Biol. Reprod. 2, 362 (1970). 11. Ryan, K.J. and Smith, O.T., Rec. Prog. Hormone Res. 21, 285 (1965). 12. Somma, M., Sander, T. and Lauthier, A., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 29, 457 (1969). 13. xbb, W. and Hagerman, D.D., Steroids 28, 31 (1976). 14. Mahajan, D..K. and Samuels, L.T., Sterxds 24, 713 (1974). 15. Ward, M.C., Anat. Rec. 94, 139 (1946). 16. Dimino, M.J., Elfont, E.A. and Berman, S.K., Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 112, 505 (1978). 17. Westwerdt, W., Mullet, 0. and Brandau, H., Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 112, 123 (1978). 18. Crisp, T.M. and Channing, C.P., Biol. Reprod. 2, 55 (1972). 19. Peluso, J.J., Steger, R.W. and Hatz, E.S.E., Biol. Reprod. 16, 600 (1977). 20. Shuchner, E.B. and Stockert, J.C., Protoplasma 76, 133 (1973). 21. YoungLai, E.V., Acta Endocrinol. (Kbh) 74, 775 (1973).