Accepted Manuscript Research papers Similarity of the temporal pattern of soil moisture across soil profile in karst catchments of southwestern China Xuezhang Li, Xianli Xu, Wen Liu, Liang He, Rongfei Zhang, Chaohao Xu, Kelin Wang PII: DOI: Reference:
S0022-1694(17)30722-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.045 HYDROL 22325
To appear in:
Journal of Hydrology
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
29 October 2016 7 August 2017 21 October 2017
Please cite this article as: Li, X., Xu, X., Liu, W., He, L., Zhang, R., Xu, C., Wang, K., Similarity of the temporal pattern of soil moisture across soil profile in karst catchments of southwestern China, Journal of Hydrology (2017), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.045
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
Similarity of the temporal pattern of soil moisture across soil profile
2
in karst catchments of southwestern China
3
Xuezhang Lia,b, Xianli Xua,b,*, Wen Liuc, Liang Hed, Rongfei Zhanga,b,e, Chaohao
4
Xu a,b,e, Kelin Wanga,b
5 6
a Key Laboratory for Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of
7
Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
8
b Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, Chinese
9
Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, China
10
c College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University,
11
Changsha 410125 China
12
d National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China
13
e University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
14
*Corresponding author at: Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of
15
Sciences, Changsha 410125, China. Tel.: +86-731-84619760
16
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (Xuezhang Li);
[email protected]
17
(Xianli Xu);
[email protected] (Wen Liu);
[email protected] (Liang He);
18
[email protected] (Rongfei Zhang);
[email protected] (Chaohao Xu);
19
[email protected] (Kelin Wang).
20
1
21
Summary:
22
Knowledge of dynamics of profile soil moisture is of importance for soil moisture
23
prediction and modelling. However, information on the relationships between soil
24
moisture at the surface and subsurface layers is relatively inadequate. The objective of
25
this study was to examine the similarities in the overall and scale specific temporal
26
patterns of soil moisture across soil profile. Soil moisture was measured at five soil
27
depths using time-domain reflectometry in two sampling plots over 242 days in a
28
karst depression. Spearman rank correlation and wavelet coherency analyzes were
29
used to determine overall and scale-dependent similarities of temporal patterns of soil
30
moisture, respectively. Results showed that soil moisture in farmland was higher than
31
grassland especially in 10-50 cm depths. The surface depth had higher variability for
32
both farmland and grassland. Spearman rank correlation coefficients between any two
33
soil depths were significant, indicating strong depth persistence in the overall
34
temporal pattern of soil moisture. The similarity decreased as the distance between
35
depths increased. Wavelet coherency analysis indicated that soil moisture temporal
36
pattern had a higher depth persistence in the farmland than grassland. Soil depth had a
37
larger influence than land uses on the similarity in soil moisture temporal pattern, and
38
the relative humidity and precipitation had larger effect than air temperature
39
controlling the change of soil moisture at larger scales. These scale specific similarity
40
in the temporal pattern of soil moisture can be used to guide estimating deeper soil
41
moisture and to improve sampling strategies for soil moisture prediction with a higher
42
prediction accuracy. 2
43
Keywords: Soil moisture, scale-dependence, wavelet coherency, temporal scale, karst
44
landscape, pedohydrology
45
3
46
1. Introduction
47
Soil moisture is a key variable in understanding a variety of hydrological and
48
climatic processes on various spatial and temporal scales (Brocca et al., 2009a;
49
Heathman et al., 2009). Soil moisture has been shown to improve streamflow
50
prediction (Brocca et al., 2009b; Anctil et al., 2008), irrigation management (Souza et
51
al., 2011), and climate modeling (Koster et al., 2004; Berg and Mulroy, 2006).
52
In southwest China, karst areas cover approximately 4.26×10 5 km2, and belong to
53
one of the largest karst regions in the world (Feng et al., 2016). Karst area is a special
54
style of landscape occurring on soluble rocks with high heterogeneity. The unique
55
dual system of karst landscape can result in rapid hydrological processes (Nie et al.,
56
2012; Butscher and Huggenberger, 2009) such as rapid transport of surface water to
57
groundwater. Therefore, the appearance, storage and circulation of water in karst
58
aquifers are apparently different than in non-karst areas. It was reported that
59
hydrological processes of karst landscape have mainly been investigated in surface
60
layers (Chen et al., 2010; Cerdà, 1998). For example, Chen et al. (2010) investigated
61
the temporal dynamics of surface soil water under different land uses on a karst
62
hillslope and found that land uses had significant effect on surface soil moisture.
63
However, knowledge of surface soil moisture is often inadequate to understand
64
hydrological processes of the relatively thin soil profile in karst landscape. In addition,
65
although the precipitation is abundant, this area experiences a seasonal drought which
66
inhibits plant growth (Nie et al., 2011). The frequent and serious droughts were
67
harmful to ecosystems and society (Cai et al., 2014). Therefore, the evolution of soil 4
68
moisture dynamics across soil profile may be helpful for hydrological modeling,
69
water resource management and vegetation restoration.
70
Soils were heterogeneous and their water content changed spatially and
71
temporally (Western et al., 1999). Nevertheless, the pioneering work of Vachaud et al.
72
(1985) had shown that the rank of soil moisture at different times and locations will
73
remain the same at a certain probability. In general, this temporal persistence of
74
spatial pattern of soil moisture also can be termed as rank persistence (Chen, 2006).
75
To date, the rank persistence of soil moisture in spatial dimension were studied
76
temporally in time series (Zhao et al., 2010; Liu and Shao, 2014; Li et al., 2016), and
77
vertically in soil depth series (Hu and Si, 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015b).
78
For instance, Liu and Shao (2014) found that the most time-stable location can
79
estimate soil water storage with a high accuracy of prediction even over multiple
80
years. Hu and Si (2014) observed that mean water content of 0-3.8 m profile was
81
predicted well by the most time stable depth at a point scale. However, there was little
82
knowledge on the similarity of soil moisture in temporal dimension across soil profile.
83
The continuous measurement of soil moisture could enable us to completely grasp the
84
similarity information of soil moisture across soil profile. It was of importance to
85
study temporal pattern of soil moisture for understanding its dynamic characteristics.
86
Soil moisture is affected by different factors operating in different intensities and
87
scales (Biswas and Si, 2011a; Seyfried, 1998). Kachanoski and de jong (1988) used
88
the spatial coherency analysis to identify the similarity of the spatial patterns as a
89
function of spatial scale. However, information on the scale-dependent of soil 5
90
moisture temporal patterns on the influencing factors was not addressed in other
91
literatures. Spearman rank correlation analysis can be used to identify the overall
92
persistence of soil moisture temporal patterns at the measurement scale. Unfortunately,
93
this analysis lost the scale and occasion information. Because the scale of the
94
processes controlling soil moisture may not always be the same as the measurements
95
scale (Blöschl and Sivapalan, 1995). Moreover, a factor can have different
96
correlations over scales and occasions that may neutralize each other over the entire
97
measurement scales (Biswas and Si, 2011b). Spectral analysis and spatial coherency
98
can reveal the scale-dependent relationships between variables, but are only
99
applicable to stationary systems (Si, 2008). Generally, soil moisture series behavior
100
belongs to non-stationary system. Wavelet coherency, however, can deal with
101
non-stationary data series, and thereby provide an opportunity to analyze the temporal
102
patterns of soil moisture at multiple scales. Wavelet coherency has been used to
103
identify the scale-location specific correlations between soil properties (Biswas and Si,
104
2011a, b; Yates et al., 2007; Shu et al., 2008). However, there is no information
105
available about the scale and occasion specific depth persistence of the temporal
106
pattern of soil moisture.
107
For a deeper insight on the issues above, this study used soil moisture data
108
measured continuously by time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes for 242 days in a
109
karst landscape. The overall and scale-dependent similarities of the temporal patterns
110
of soil moisture were identified using Spearman rank correlation and wavelet
111
coherency analyses, respectively. The specific objectives of this study were: (1) to 6
112
analyze the depth persistence of temporal patterns of soil moisture in a karst typical
113
depression, and (2) to confirm the scale-dependence of soil moisture on controlling
114
factors.
115
7
116
2. Materials and methods
117
2.1 Site description
118
The study was carried out in Guzhou catchment located in Huanjiang County of
119
northwest Guangxi, China (Fig. 1). Guzhou catchment is a typical karstic peak-cluster
120
depression area with a flat depression surrounded by steep mountains. The catchment
121
has an area of 1.87 km2 with an elevation of 375 to 816 m a.s.l., and has 0.17 km2 of
122
farmland mainly located in the depression. A subtropical mountainous monsoon
123
climate dominates with mean annual air temperature of 18.5℃and mean annual
124
rainfall of 1389 mm, mostly falling from late April to September. The calcareous soils
125
initiated from limestone contain few rock fragments and have an average depth of
126
50-80 cm in the depression and 10-30 cm on hillslope, respectively (Chen et al. 2010).
127
In late 2002, some farmlands (corn) in the depression were converted into forage
128
grassland (hybrid Napiergrass Guimu-1) to feed cattle for economic benefits. In late
129
2014, a sample plot (5×5 m) was established from representative farmland and
130
grassland for soil moisture measurements, respectively.
131
2.2 Sampling and measurements
132
2.2.1 Soil moisture measurements
133
In each sample plot, the TDR (Hydra Probe II) probes were installed in order to
134
better understand profile soil moisture dynamics. The TDR probes were vertically
135
installed at depths of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 cm, respectively, with soil moisture data
136
recorded each 30 min for 242 days from March 12, 2015 to November 8, 2015. There
137
were 58080 measurements in total during the sampling period for each sample plot, 8
138
and we used daily average value of each depth in this study.
139
2.2.2 Meteorological variables measurements
140
Meteorological data were collected from a microclimate station (HOBO U30
141
station made by Onset Computer Corp., MA, USA) installed near both of the sample
142
plots in the depression. The meteorological data included precipitation, wind speed,
143
air temperature, relative humidity, and global radiation. For this study, the
144
meteorological variables were converted to represent daily average values for air
145
temperature and relative humidity. Precipitation was presented as daily accumulated
146
values. Considering the significant influence, air temperature, precipitation and
147
relative humidity were selected to analyze their effects on profile soil moisture in the
148
temporal dimension.
149
2.2.3 Measurements of other main characteristics
150
A portable global positioning system (GPS) was employed to locate the sampling
151
sites and record the corresponding elevation (above sea level). From each sample plot,
152
three undisturbed soil core samples were collected by cutting rings (5 cm in height; 20
153
cm2 cross section) for measurements of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (KS)
154
using the constant-head method (Klute and Dirksen, 1986) and of soil bulk density
155
(BD). In addition, a soil corer was used to collect disturbed soil samples from each of
156
the five layers corresponding to those used for soil moisture measurements. The
157
disturbed soil samples were air-dried and divided into two sub-samples. One
158
sub-sample was passed through a 1-mm sieve to analyze soil particle size distribution
159
using a MS 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) 9
160
which was calibrated by Sieve-Pipette Method (Feng et al., 2013). The other
161
sub-sample was passed through a 0.25 mm sieve for the determination of soil
162
organic-carbon (SOC) content by the K2Cr2O7 method. Aboveground biomass (AGB)
163
were measured by clipped from three 1×1 m quadrats in each sample plot. The plant
164
samples were oven-dried at 75 ℃ for 72 h to obtain dry weights. Detailed
165
descriptions of the surface soil (0-10 cm) and vegetation characteristics for the sample
166
plots are shown in Table 1.
167
2.3 Methodology
168
2.3.1 Assessment of the depth persistence of temporal patterns of soil moisture
169
(1) Spearman’s rank correlation analysis
170
The non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation test introduced by Vachaud et al.
171
(1985) was applied to evaluate the similarly of the overall temporal pattern of soil
172
moisture. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient is expressed as follows: n
(
6∑ i =1 Rij − Rij '
)
2
(1)
173
rs = 1 −
174
where Rij and Rij’ are the ranks of the soil moisture observed at time i in soil layers j
175
and j’, respectively, and n is the number of observations. A Spearman’s rank
176
correlation value closer to 1 indicates the stronger tendency of similarity of soil
177
moisture in time series between different soil depths.
178
(2) Wavelet coherency analysis
n( n 2 − 1)
179
Wavelet coherency of two temporal series of soil moisture across soil profile was
180
used to describe the depth persistence of temporal pattern in this study. Wavelet
181
coherency analysis requires the calculation of wavelet coefficients for each of the two 10
182
data series and associated cross-wavelet spectrum. A detailed introduction on the
183
theory of the wavelet transform (Farge, 1992; Kumar and Foufoula-Georgiou, 1997)
184
and the wavelet coherency (Grinsted et al., 2004; Si and Zeleke, 2005; Si, 2008) can
185
be found.
186
(3) Significance testing
187
The significance test for wavelet coherency can be performed against a Gaussian
188
white or red noise or permutation test (Pardo-Iguzquiza and Rodriguez-Tovar, 2000).
189
A white noise shows that the data series are independently and identically distributed
190
normal random variables (Si and Zeleke, 2005). However, soil properties are usually
191
autocorrelated (Isaaks and Srivastava, 1989), thus a white noise is not appropriate. For
192
a red noise, the data of variables are dependent on those in a short sampling interval
193
with a univariate lag 1 autoregssive (AR1) process (Torrence and Compo, 1998; Si
194
and Farrell, 2004). There are many soil properties exhibiting the red noise-like
195
behavior ( Grinsted et al., 2004; Torrence and Compo, 1998; Si and Farrell, 2004),
196
including soil moisture, soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and so on. Therefore, red
197
noise-like behavior is treated as the background or the null hypothesis for a statistical
198
test. In this study, soil moisture can be approximated using AR1 processes according
199
to Torrence and Compo (1998).
200
For a given AR1 process with a lag-1 autocorrelation coefficient r, a temporal
201
series can be generated using the Monte Carlo simulation. In this study, we generated
202
1000 realizations of a temporal soil moisture series, then computed the wavelet power.
203
At each scale, the 1000 wavelet powers were sorted into ascending order. If 95% of 11
204
the wavelet power bellow the 950th wavelet coherency value, then 95% level is the
205
95% confidence level (Si and Zeleke, 2005). The wavelet coherency can reflect
206
relationships between variables at each scale and occasion. The phase information can
207
also be identified using the wavelet coherency analysis.
208
2.4 Statistical analysis
209
Exploratory analysis was conducted by Microsoft Office Excel (Microsoft
210
Corporation Inc., Redmond, USA). Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was
211
implemented with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Wavelet coherency analysis
212
was performed using the MATLAB R2015a (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA)
213
software with code written by Grinsted et al. (2004).
214
12
215
3. Results
216
3.1 The temporal pattern of soil moisture in the various soil depths
217
Fig. 2 showed the daily dynamics of soil moisture of five selected soil layers for
218
both farmland and grassland with corresponding air temperature and precipitation.
219
The precipitation has obvious seasonal change, mainly falls during late April to late
220
September. However, the change of air temperature was relatively small compared
221
with precipitation, ranging from 12.5 to 28.5 ℃ with coefficient of variation of
222
14.7% (Table 2). Mean soil moisture ranged from 0.39 to 0.62 cm3 cm-3 across soil
223
profile for the farmland. Mean soil moisture in 0-10 cm depth was apparently lower
224
than the deeper soil depths (20-50 cm). The standard deviation of soil moisture was
225
the highest in the 0-10 cm depth and declined in deeper depths (Table 2). The
226
coefficient of variation was the highest (10.7%) in 0-10 cm depth, and gradually
227
decreased to 2.7% in 30-40 cm depth. For the grassland, mean soil moisture changed
228
relatively small across soil profile, ranging from 0.32 to 0.43 cm3 cm-3 (Table 2). The
229
standard deviation and coefficient of variation exhibited similar trend across soil
230
profile in comparison with the farmland (Table 2). The difference of mean soil
231
moisture in 0-10 cm depth was low between farmland and grassland, however, the
232
mean soil moisture of 10-50 cm depths was significantly higher in farmland than
233
grassland.
234
The response of soil moisture to air temperature was not significant in visual for
235
both land uses. However, soil moisture was sensitive to the precipitation, especially in
236
shallow soil layers. There were three deep depressions during the sampling period, 13
237
including Apr. 25, Jul. 20, and Oct. 30 2015, respectively (Fig. 2). For instance,
238
during the period of Apr. 3 to Apr. 25 with little rainfall, the soil moisture in 0-10 cm
239
depth decreased from 0.37 to 0.29 cm3 cm-3 and 0.38 to 0.26 cm3 cm-3 for farmland
240
and grassland, respectively; but seemed no change (decreased only from 0.57 to 0.56
241
cm3 cm-3 and 0.39 to 0.38 cm3 cm-3) for farmland and grassland in the 40-50 cm depth
242
(Fig. 2), respectively.
243
3.2 Similarity in the overall temporal pattern of soil moisture in the soil profile
244
Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs) between any two soil depths for both
245
farmland and grassland were statistically significant (p < 0.001), indicating strong
246
similarities between soil depths. The value of rs decreased gradually with increasing
247
depth interval for both farmland and grassland (Table 3). For instance, rs was 0.909
248
between soil moisture of the 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm and was 0.540 between the 0-10
249
cm and 40-50 cm for grassland. However, rs between any two depths of farmland
250
were relatively larger than that of grassland (Table 3). In addition, the value of rs
251
ranged from 0.929 to 0.980 for farmland, but from 0.540 to 0.952 for grassland.
252
3.3 Similarities in the scales of temporal pattern of soil moisture in the soil profile
253
The scales were divided into three groups based on the similarities among the
254
wavelet coherency graphs between any two soil depths, including small (< 4 d),
255
medium (4-16 d), and large (> 16 d) scales.
256
For the farmland, the significant correlations existed in most of the time series at
257
small scales between soil moisture of the 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths, but gradually
258
reduced with increasing depth interval (Fig. 3). Most of the occasions had significant 14
259
correlations for soil moisture at medium scales between the 0-10 cm and 10-20, 20-30,
260
30-40, and 40-50 cm depths (Fig. 3), respectively, except for a few occasions.
261
However, there were significant correlations over the whole time series for the scales
262
of 16-32 d between 0-10 cm depth and any other depths (Fig. 3). For the grassland,
263
there were no significant correlations for soil moisture only at the beginning of the
264
time series between the 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths, but there were more occasions
265
with no significant correlations between 0-10 and the deeper depths at small scales
266
(Fig. 4). Significant correlations were found nearly across all the time series at
267
medium scales between the 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths (Fig. 4a). However, there were
268
no significant correlations at medium scales between 0-10 cm and other depths (20-30,
269
30-40, and 40-50 cm), mainly located at Mar. 12 to Apr. 15 and Aug. 2 to Oct. 6 (Fig.
270
4b, c, d). Soil moisture between 0-10 cm and other two depths (10-20 and 20-30 cm)
271
were significantly correlated nearly across the entire time series at scales of 16-32 d
272
(Fig. 4a, b), while significant correlations between 0-10 and the other two depths
273
(30-40 and 40-50 cm) mainly concentrated between Apr. 25 and Oct. 6 (Fig. 4c, d).
274
In terms of wavelet coherency analysis, significantly correlated occasions covered
275
most of the time series intermittently at the small scales (Fig. 5). The soil moisture
276
was significantly correlated between farmland and grassland at the medium scales for
277
each depth across the entire time series in additional to a few occasions (Fig. 5).
278
However, the significant correlations between farmland and grassland were observed
279
across all over the time series at scales of 16-32 d for all depths (Fig. 5).
15
280
The difference in wavelet coherency between different depths or land uses can be
281
determined in terms of area of significant correlation (Figs. 3-5; Table 4). The total
282
area representing significant correlations at different scales gradually decreased with
283
increasing depth interval for both farmland and grassland (Table 4). For instance, the
284
significant area was 0.99 between 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths for farmland, and
285
gradually decreased to 0.76 between 0-10 and 40-50 cm depths. The total area of
286
significant correlation between the same depths was relatively higher for farmland
287
compared to grassland (Table 4). However, the total area representing significant
288
correlation of each depth between farmland and grassland changed within a small
289
extent, ranging from 0.79 to 0.91 (Table 4).
290
Wavelet coherency analysis was also carried out to reveal the temporal
291
relationships between the soil moisture and air temperature, relative humidity, and
292
precipitation (Figs. 6 and 7). Significant correlations between soil moisture and
293
temperature in 0-10 cm depth for farmland displayed at some occasions in small and
294
medium scales (Fig. 6a). Significant effects of relative humidity on soil moisture in
295
the 0-10 cm depth can be found at some occasions in small scales and all over the
296
time series at scales of 16-32 d (Fig. 6b). The significant correlations between soil
297
moisture and precipitation existed at lots of occasions for all scales (Fig. 6c).
298
Moreover, a similar trend was observed between soil moisture and temperature,
299
relative humidity, and precipitation for the 40-50 cm depth (Fig. 6d, e, f). For
300
grassland, the relationships between soil moisture and influencing factors were similar
301
to that of farmland for both 0-10 and 40-50 cm depths (Fig. 7). For farmland, the 16
302
significant area between soil moisture and influencing factors for both 0-10 and 40-50
303
cm depths increased in the order of temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation,
304
respectively (Table 5). However, relative humidity had the largest effect on soil
305
moisture in the 0-10 cm depth for grassland, while precipitation in the 40-50 cm depth
306
(Table 5).
307
Additionally, type of correlation can be examined according to the direction of
308
arrows. The left directed arrows of significant areas indicated positive correlation,
309
while the right directed arrows suggested negative correlation. Soil moisture was
310
observed correlated positively with relative humidity and precipitation but negatively
311
with air temperature (Figs. 6 and 7).
312
17
313
4. Discussion
314
In comparison with farmland, soil moisture of the 10-50 cm depth was lower for
315
grassland. This can be attributed to that the grassland had much more aboveground
316
biomass but much lower soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Table 1), and then
317
consumed more soil water and generated more runoff. Though soil profiles of both
318
farmland and grassland in karst depression contained high soil moisture (Table 2), the
319
total amount of water stored in soil profile in karst region may be lower even than
320
some semiarid or arid areas such as the Loess Plateau in north of China. There were
321
two reasons to explain this phenomenon. One reason was that the soil thickness only
322
ranged from 10-30 cm on hillslope to 50-80 cm in depression (Chen et al., 2010),
323
resulting in the lower soil water storage. The other reason was that the unique dual
324
structure of soil had strong water permeability (Butscher and Huggenberger, 2009;
325
Nie et al., 2012) in karst regions. Therefore, severe water shortage caused by extreme
326
droughts occurring in this area should be considerable for hydrological management
327
and policy making.
328
Soil moisture was affected by many influencing factors, including static (e.g., soil
329
texture, bulk density, topography) and dynamic (e.g., temperature, precipitation,
330
relative humidity) factors (Reynolds, 1970; Crow et al., 2012). Static factors
331
controlling soil water holding capacity had major control on variability of soil
332
moisture in spatial series (Vachaud et al., 1985; Mohanty and Skaggs, 2001; Starks et
333
al., 2006; Cosh et al., 2008; Li et al., 2015a). For example, Mohanty and Skaggs
334
(2001) found that soil type, as characterized by bulk density, sand and clay content, 18
335
was responsible for nearly 50% of the temporal stability. However, the change of soil
336
moisture in temporal dimension was mainly determined by the dynamic factors such
337
as precipitation. In this study, there was a remarkable response of soil moisture to the
338
precipitation during the period with frequent rains for both farmland and grassland.
339
For instance, the soil moisture fluctuated at higher values with rainfall during the Apr.
340
28 and Jul. 3 2015 (Fig. 2). It was reported that soil moisture can be predicted
341
appropriately by the static factors in spatial dimension (Hu and Si, 2013). Similarly,
342
the dynamic factors may play a more important role in predicting the soil moisture in
343
time dimension.
344
High spearman rank correlation coefficients between soil moisture series at any
345
two depths indicated strong similarity of the overall temporal patterns across soil
346
profile, in accordance with the findings by Li et al. (2015b), and Jia et al. (2013). This
347
may be due to the limited soil texture heterogeneity across the soil profile at the same
348
location. However, the correlation coefficients between the surface depth and
349
subsurface depths gradually decreased with increasing depth interval. These results
350
are in agreement with those from other literatures (Biswas and Si, 2011a; Li et al.,
351
2015b; Zhang and Shao, 2013). For example, Biswas and Si (2011a) found a higher rs
352
of soil water storage with a smaller interval of soil in both recharge and discharge
353
period. This is because the impact of hydrological processes controlling the temporal
354
patterns of soil moisture gradually decreased with increasing soil interval, leading to
355
less variability (Table 2) in the subsurface. The range of rs for farmland was higher
356
than for grassland, indicating the effects of plant utilization. In this study, grass can 19
357
consume a large amount of water in comparison with corn and then weaken the
358
overall similarity of soil moisture in temporal series.
359
The depth persistence of temporal pattern for soil moisture can be referred to as
360
rank stability (Chen, 2006). Rank stability of soil moisture presents a practical basis
361
for exploring statistical methods for imputing missing values of soil moisture data.
362
For example, Dumedah and Coulibaly (2011) evaluated the six selected methods
363
based on rank stability conception for infilling missing values of soil water data, and
364
found that the merged method can consistently provide the best evaluation accuracy
365
across all locations. In addition, the easy-to-measure surface soil moisture can be used
366
to estimate soil moisture in the subsurface or soil profile to reduce time and labor cost.
367
Hu and Si (2014) verified that soil moisture at the most time stable depth can predict
368
soil moisture of soil profile well at both point and hillslope scales.
369
The total area of significant coherency at the different scales gradually decreased
370
with increasing depth interval for both farmland and grassland, in agreement with
371
other studies (Biswas and Si, 2011a; Li et al., 2015b). These results implied a
372
reduction in the degree of similarity in soil moisture temporal patterns and coincided
373
with the results of the Spearman rank correlation analysis. However, there was a
374
reduction of total area of significant coherency between the same depths from the
375
farmland to grassland, suggesting that the similarity was lower in grassland. This can
376
be attributed to plant species: on the one hand, the root system of hybrid Napiergrass
377
utilized soil moisture unevenly in soil profile could weaken the depth persistence of
378
soil moisture temporal patterns; on the other hand, the hybrid Napiergrass with higher 20
379
aboveground
biomass
could
affect
crucial
hydrological
process
such
as
380
evapotranspiration and rainfall redistribution. In addition, soil depth had a larger
381
effect than plant series on the similarities in soil moisture temporal patterns. For
382
example, the ranges of area of significant correlation between depths for farmland and
383
grassland were 0.23 and 0.45, respectively (Table 4). However, the range of area of
384
significant correlation between farmland and grassland was 0.12 (Table 4).
385
The correlations of soil moisture between different depths were significant at most
386
of scales and occasions, whereas soil moisture significantly correlated with the
387
meteorological factors at some specific scales. This is because the underlying
388
processes between influencing factors and soil moisture may not operate at the same
389
scales. Therefore, processes that were dominant at one scale may not have a
390
significant effect at other scales (Zeleke and Si, 2005). In this study, for example, soil
391
moisture was more deterministic as affected by the relative humidity at greater scales
392
(Figs. 6 and 7), while soil moisture significantly correlated with temperature at some
393
occasions for small scales. Meteorological factors had more effects on changes of soil
394
moisture in comparison to static factors, and the relations between these
395
meteorological factors and soil moisture temporal patterns were scale-dependent. The
396
scale influences of controlling factors were also reported by other researchers (Biswas
397
et al., 2011a, b; Li et al., 2015b; Hu and Si, 2013). Biswas et al. (2011a) found that
398
elevation had obvious effects on soil moisture spatial patterns at greater scales.
399
However, Li et al. (2015b) and Hu and Si (2013) found that soil texture significantly
400
correlated
soil moisture
at
greater
scales. 21
An
important
application of
401
scale-dependence was that some variables can be predicted at specific scale for a
402
higher
403
scale-dependence were successful performed (Hu and Si, 2013; He et al., 2015). Hu
404
and Si (2013) predicted soil water appropriately using multivariate empirical mode
405
decomposition in a Canadian prairie area and a watershed on the Chinese Loess
406
Plateau. He et al. (2015) found that the hybrid wavelet neural network model can
407
improve the monthly rainfall forecasting accuracy over Australia compared with the
408
reference models. Additionally, since soil moisture temporal patterns can be well
409
predicted with more meteorological factors at larger time scales, it was not necessary
410
to carry out sampling activities frequently especially for artificial sampling.
accuracy
of
prediction.
Some
411
22
presented
methods
derived
from
412
6. Conclusions
413
This study investigated the similarities in soil moisture temporal pattern across
414
soil profiles in a karst landscape using Spearman rank correlation and wavelet
415
coherency analyses. Soil moisture was relatively lower in grassland than farmland for
416
each soil depth, which can be attributed to the higher aboveground biomass in
417
grassland and the higher soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in farmland. The change
418
of soil moisture was sensitive to precipitation rather than air temperature, indicating
419
that the precipitation may have a larger effect than air temperature for soil moisture
420
prediction in temporal dimension.
421
The overall soil moisture temporal pattern of the surface depth was more similar
422
to the depths closest to the surface and gradually decreased with the increase in
423
distance between the depths. Therefore, the easy-to-measure surface soil moisture can
424
be used to estimate soil moisture at deeper depths. The relationships between soil
425
moisture and controlling variables were obviously dependent on temporal scales. The
426
significant effect of temperature was found at small temporal scales, while the
427
significant effects of the relative humidity and precipitation were observed at larger
428
temporal scales. The scale information of soil moisture variations may improve the
429
performance of soil moisture estimation.
430
23
431
Acknowledgement
432
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
433
China (41471233; 41571130073; 41601223; 41501478), Youth Innovation Team
434
Project of ISA, CAS (2017QNCXTD_XXL), and the “100 talents program” (2060299)
435
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Special thanks go to the editor and anonymous
436
reviewers for their constructive suggestions which greatly improve the manuscript.
437
24
438
References
439
Anctil, F., Lauzon, N., Filion, M., 2008. Added gains of soil moisture content
440
observations for streamflow predictions using neural networks. J. Hydrol. 359 (3-4),
441
225-234.
442
Berg,
443
Saskatchewan/Nelson River basin given macroscale estimates of the initial soil
444
moisture status. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 51 (4), 642-654.
445
Biswas, A., Si, B.C., 2011a. Depth persistence of the spatial pattern of soil water
446
storage in a hummocky landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75 (3), 1099-1109.
447
Biswas, A., Si, B.C., 2011b. Identifying scale specific controls of soil water storage in
448
a hummocky landscape using wavelet coherency. Geoderma 165 (1), 50-59.
449
Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., 1995. Scale issues in hydrological modeling: a review.
450
Hydrol. Process. 9, 251–290.
451
Brocca, L., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., Morbidelli, R., 2009a. Soil moisture temporal
452
stability over experimental areas in Central Italy. Geoderma 148, 364-374.
453
Brocca, L., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., Singh, V. P., 2009b. Assimilation of observed
454
soil moisture data in storm rainfall-runoff modeling. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (2), 153-165.
455
Butscher, C., Huggenberger, P., 2009. Modeling the temporal variability of karst
456
groundwater vulnerability, with implications for climate change. Environ. Sci.
457
Technol. 43 (6), 1665–1669.
458
Cai, W.J., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., Rensch, P.V., Collins, M., Vecchi, G.,
459
Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M.J., Wu, L.X., England, M.H., Wang, G.J.,
A.A.,
Mulroy,
K.A.,
2006.
25
Streamflow
predictability
in
the
460
Guilyardi, E., Jin, F.F., 2014. Increasing frequency of extreme EI Niño events due to
461
greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Change 4 (2), 111-116.
462
Cerdà, A., 1998. The influence of geomorphological position and vegetation cover on
463
the erosional and hydrological processes on a Mediterranean hillslope. Hydrol.
464
Process. 12, 661–671.
465
Chen H.S., Zhang W., Wang K.L., Fu W., 2010. Soil moisture dynamics under
466
different land uses on karst hillslope in northwest Guangxi, China. Environ. Earth Sci.
467
61, 1105-1111.
468
Chen, Y.J., 2006. Letter to the editor on “rank stability or temporal stability”. Soil Sci.
469
Soc. Am. J. 70, 306.
470
Cosh, M.H., Jackson, T.J., Moran, S., Bindlish, R., 2008. Temporal persistence and
471
stability of surface soil moisture in a semi-arid watershed. Remote Sens. Environ. 112
472
(2), 304-313.
473
Crow, W.T., Berg, A.A., Cosh, M.H., Loew, A., Mohanty, B.P., Panciera, R., de
474
Rosnay, P., Ryu, D., Walker, J.P., 2012. Upscaling sparse ground-based soil moisture
475
observations for the validation of coarse-resolution satellite soil moisture products.
476
Rev. Geophys. 50 (2), 3881-3888.
477
Dumedah, G., Coulibaly, P., 2011. Evaluation of statistical methods for infilling
478
missing values in high-resolution soil moisture data. J. Hydrol. 400 (s1-2), 95-102.
479
Farge, M., 1992. Wavelet transform and their applications to turbulence. Annu. Rev.
480
Fluid Mech. 24, 395–457.
481
Feng, T., Chen, H.S., Polyakov, V.O., Wang, K.L., Zhang, X.B., Zhang, W., 2016. Soil 26
482
erosion rates in two karst peak-cluster depression basins of northwest Guangxi, China:
483
comparison of the RUSLE model with
484
217-224.
485
Feng T., Chen H.S., Zhang W., Wang K.L. Comparative Study on Determining Soil
486
Particle Size Distribution Measured by Laser Diffraction and the Sieve-Pipette
487
Method in Karst Regions. Research of agricultural modernization, 2013, 34(1):
488
100-103 (in Chinese).
489
Grinsted, A., Moore, J.C., Jevrejeva, S., 2004. Application of cross wavelet transform
490
and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Proc. Geoph. 11,
491
561–566.
492
He, X.G., Guan, H.D., Qin, J.X., 2015. A hybrid wavelet neural network model with
493
mutual information and particle swarm optimization for forecasting monthly rainfall. J.
494
Hydrol. 527 (17), 88-100.
495
Heathman, G.C., Larose, M., Cosh, M.H., Bindlish, R., 2009. Surface and profile soil
496
moisture spatio-temporal analysis during an excessive rainfall period in the Southern
497
Great Plains, USA. Catena 78, 159-169.
498
Hu, W., Si, B.C., 2013. Soil Water prediction based on its scale-specific control using
499
multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Geoderma 193 (2), 180–188.
500
Hu, W., Si, B.C., 2014. Can soil water measurements at a certain depth be used to
501
estimate mean soil water content of a soil profile at a point or at a hillslope scale? J.
502
Hydrol. 516 (6), 67-75.
137
CS measurements. Geomorphology, 253,
27
503
Isaaks, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics, Oxford
504
Univ. Press, New York.
505
Jia, X.X., Shao, M.A., Wei, X.R., Wang, Y.Q., 2013. Hillslope scale temporal stability
506
of soil water storage in diverse soil layers. J. Hydrol. 498 (18), 254-264.
507
Kachanoski, R.G., de jong, E., 1988. Scale dependence and the temporal persistence
508
of spatial patterns of soil-water storage. Water Resour. Res. 24, 85-91.
509
Klute, A., Dirksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils. In: Klute, A.
510
(Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp.
511
694–700.
512
Koster, R.D., Dirmeyer, P.A., Guo, Z.C., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., Gordon, C.T.,
513
Kanae, S., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Lu, C.H., Malyshev, S., McAvaney,
514
B., Mitchell, K., Mocko, D., Oki, T., Oleson, K., Pitman, A., Sud, Y.C., Taylor, C.M.,
515
Verseghy, D., Vasic, R., Xue, Y.K., Yamada, T., 2004. Regions of strong coupling
516
between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 305 (5687), 1138–1140.
517
Kumar, P., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1997. Wavelet analysis of geophysical applications.
518
Rev. Geophys. 35, 385–412.
519
Li, X.Z., Shao, M.A, Jia, X.X, Wei, X.R., 2015a. Landscape-scale temporal stability
520
of soil water storage within profiles on the semiarid loess plateau of china. J. Soils
521
Sediment. 15 (4), 949-961.
522
Li, X.Z., Shao, M.A., Jia, X.X., Wei, X.R., 2016. Profile distribution of soil-water
523
content and its temporal stability along a 1340-m long transect on the Loess Plateau,
524
China. Catena 137, 77-86. 28
525
Li, X.Z., Shao, M.A., Jia, X.X., Wei, X.R., He, L., 2015b. Depth persistence of the
526
spatial pattern of soil-water storage along a small transect in the loess plateau of china.
527
J. Hydrol. 529, 685-695.
528
Liu, B.X., Shao, M.A., 2014. Estimation of soil water storage using temporal stability
529
in four land uses over 10 years on the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 517, 974–984.
530
Mohanty, B.P., Skaggs, T.H., 2001. Spatio-temporal evolution and time-stable
531
characteristics of soil moisture within remote sensing footprints with varying soil,
532
slope, and vegetation. Adv. Water Resour. 24 (s 9–10), 1051-1067.
533
Nie, Y.P., Chen, H.S., Wang, K.L., Tan, W., Deng, P.Y., Yang, J., 2011. Seasonal water
534
use patterns of woody species growing on the continuous dolostone outcrops and
535
nearby thin soils in subtropical China. Plant Soil 341 (1-2), 399-412.
536
Nie, Y.P., Chen, H.S., Wang, K.L., Yang, J., 2012. Water source utilization by woody
537
plants growing on dolomite outcrops and nearby soils during dry seasons in karst
538
region of southwest china. J. Hydrol. s 420–421 (4), 264-274.
539
Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., Rodriguez-Tovar, F.J., 2000. The permutation test as a
540
nonparametric method for testing the statistical significance of power spectrum
541
estimation in cyclostratigraphic research. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 181, 175–189.
542
Reynolds, S.F., 1970. The gravimetric method of soil moisture determination. Ⅱ:
543
typical required sample sizes and methods of reducing variability. J. Hydrol. 11,
544
274-287.
545
Seyfried, M., 1998. Spatial variability constraints to modeling soil water at different
546
scales. Geoderma 85, 231–254. 29
547
Shu, Q., Liu, Z., Si, B.C., 2008. Characterizing scale and location dependent
548
correlation of water retention parameters with soil physical properties using wavelet
549
techniques. J. Environ. Qual. 37 (6), 2284-2292.
550
Si, B.C., 2008. Spatial scaling analyses of soil physical properties: a review of
551
spectral and wavelet methods. Vadose Zone J. 7, 547–562.
552
Si, B.C., Farrell, R.E., 2004. Scale-dependent relationship between wheat yield and
553
topographic indices: a wavelet approach. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68 (68), 577-587.
554
Si, B.C., Zeleke, T.B., 2005. Wavelet coherency analysis to relate saturated hydraulic
555
properties to soil physical properties. Water Resour. Res. 41, W11424.
556
Souza, E.R.D., Montenegro, A.A.D.A., Montenegro, S.M.G., Matos, J.D.A.D., 2011.
557
Temporal stability of soil moisture in irrigated carrot crops in Northeast Brazil. Agr.
558
Water Manage. 99 (1), 26-32.
559
Starks, P.J., Heathman, G.C., Jackson, T.J., Cosh, M.H., 2006. Temporal stability of
560
soil moisture profile. J. Hydrol. 324 (1–4), 400–411.
561
Torrence, C., Compo, G.P., 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. B. Am.
562
Meteorol. Soc. 79, 61–78.
563
Vachaud, G., Passerat de Silans, A., Balabanis, P., Vauclin, M., 1985. Temporal
564
stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function. Soil Sci. Soc.
565
Am. J. 49, 822–828.
566
Wang, Y.Q., Hu, W., Zhu, Y.J., Shao, M.A., Xiao, S., Zhang, C.C., 2015. Vertical
567
distribution and temporal stability of soil water in 21-m profiles under different land
568
uses on the loess plateau in china. J. Hydrol. 527, 543-554. 30
569
Western, A.W., Grayson, R.B., Günter, B., Willgoose, G.R., Mcmahon, T.A., 1999.
570
Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water
571
Resour. Res. 35 (3), 797-810.
572
Yates, T.T., Si, B.C., Farrell, R.E., Pennock, D.J., 2007. Time, location, and scale
573
dependence of soil nitrous oxide emission, water, and temperature using wavelet
574
coherency analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D09104.
575
Zeleke, T.B., Si, B.C., 2005. Scaling relationships between saturated hydraulic
576
conductivity and soil physical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69 (6), 1691-1702.
577
Zhang, P.P., Shao, M.A., 2013. Temporal stability of surface soil moisture in a desert
578
area of northwestern China. J. Hydrol. 505, 91–101.
579
Zhao, Y., Peth, S., Wang, X.Y., Lin, H., Horn, R., 2010. Controls of surface soil
580
moisture spatial patterns and their temporal stability in a semi-arid steppe. Hydrol.
581
Process. 24 (18), 2507-2519.
582
31
Farmland
TDR
Guzhou 583
Grassland
584 585 586 587
Fig. 1 Location of the study area, sampling position and time domain reflectometry
588
(TDR) system in Guzhou catchment in northwest Guangxi, China.
589
32
590 591
592 593
Fig. 2 Evolution of soil moisture in various soil depths for farmland and grassland
594
with corresponding temperature, relative humidity and precipitation above.
33
595 596
Fig. 3 Wavelet coherency of soil moisture in the time series between (a) the 0 to 10
597
and the 10 to 20 cm depths, (b) the 0 to 10 and the 20 to 30 cm depths, (c) the 0 to 10
598
and the 30 to 40 cm depths, and (d) the 0 to 10 and the 40 to 50 cm depths for
599
farmland. The y-axes are the scales in days. The color bars indicate the values of the
600
wavelet coefficients, the solid black lines represent the 5% significance levels, and the
601
arrows indicate the phase relationships. 34
602 603
Fig. 4 Wavelet coherency of soil moisture in the time series between (a) the 0 to 10
604
and the 10 to 20 cm depths, (b) the 0 to 10 and the 20 to 30 cm depths, (c) the 0 to 10
605
and the 30 to 40 cm depths, and (d) the 0 to 10 and the 40 to 50 cm depths for
606
grassland. The y-axes are the scales in days. The color bars indicate the values of the
607
wavelet coefficients, the solid black lines represent the 5% significance levels, and the
608
arrows indicate the phase relationships. 35
609 610
Fig. 5 Wavelet coherency of soil moisture in the time series between farmland and
611
grassland in the (a) 0 to 10, (b) 10 to 20, (c) 20 to 30, (d) 30 to 40, and (e) 40 to 50 cm
612
depths. The y-axes are the scales in days. The color bars indicate the values of the
613
wavelet coefficients, the solid black lines represent the 5% significance levels, and the
614
arrows indicate the phase relationships.
36
615 616
Fig. 6 Wavelet coherency between soil moisture and temperature, relative humidity,
617
and precipitation in the time series for the (a, b, and c) 0-10 and (d, e, and f) 40-50 cm
618
depths for farmland. The y-axes are the scales in days. The color bars indicate the
619
values of the wavelet coefficients, the solid black lines represent the 5% significance
620
levels, and the arrows indicate the phase relationships.
37
621 622
Fig. 7 Wavelet coherency between soil moisture and temperature, relative humidity,
623
and precipitation in the time series for the (a, b, and c) 0-10 and (d, e, and f) 40-50 cm
624
depths for grassland. The y-axes are the scales in days. The color bars indicate the
625
values of the wavelet coefficients, the solid black lines represent the 5% significance
626
levels, and the arrows indicate the phase relationships.
627
38
628
Table 1 Summary statistics of surface soil properties and AGB for farmland and grassland,
629
respectively.
630 631 632
Variabl BD (g es cm-3) Farmlan d 1.43±0.05 Grassla nd 1.45±0.04 BD, bulk density; Ks, aboveground biomass.
Ks (mm min-1)
Clay Silt Sand SOC (g AGB (g -1 (%) (%) (%) kg ) m-2) 11.3±0. 57.4±1. 31.3±1. 0.026±0.024 9 3 0 8.9±1.2 287±19 15.0±1. 50.5±1. 34.6±1. 0.004±0.002 1 4 7 11.1±1.5 907±142 saturated soil hydraulic conductivity; SOC, soil organic carbon; AGB,
39
633 634
Table 2 Statistical summary of meteorological parameters and soil moisture in the various soil
635
depths for farmland and grassland, respectively. Parameter
Max
Min
Mean
SD
CV (%)
Temperature (℃) Precipitation (mm) Relative humidity (%)
28.5 75.9 99.8
12.5 0 69.7
23.0 7.1 89.7
3.4 14.2 7.1
14.7 199.9 7.9
Layer (cm)
Max (cm3 cm-3)
Min (cm3 cm-3)
Mean (cm3 cm-3)
SD (cm3 cm-3)
CV (%)
0.45 0.58 0.54 0.65 0.62
0.28 0.45 0.45 0.55 0.52
0.39 0.54 0.51 0.62 0.58
0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02
10.7 5.4 4.1 2.7 3.3
0.42 0.38 0.40 0.46 0.45
0.25 0.23 0.29 0.39 0.35
0.36 0.32 0.36 0.43 0.41
0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02
10.7 10.1 6.6 3.6 4.9
Farmland 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Grassland 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 636 637
SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation.
40
638 639
Table 3 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between soil moisture of various soil depths for
640
farmland and grassland, respectively. Depth (cm) Farmland 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Grassland 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50
641 642
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
1.000
0.980 1.000
0.952 0.977 1.000
0.929 0.968 0.966 1.000
0.946 0.963 0.964 0.965 1.000
1.000
0.909 1.000
0.802 0.952 1.000
0.613 0.824 0.910 1.000
0.540 0.780 0.846 0.944 1.000
All correlations were significant at P < 0.001.
41
643 644
Table 4 Significant area for soil moisture between the 0-10 cm depth and the other soil depths for
645
farmland and grassland, and between farmland and grassland for various soil depths. Land uses Farmland
Grassland
Farmland vs grassland
Significant area 0-10 vs 10-20 0-10 vs 20-30 0-10 vs 30-40 0-10 vs 40-50 0-10 vs 10-20 0-10 vs 20-30 0-10 vs 30-40 0-10 vs 40-50 0-10 vs 0-10 10-20 vs 10-20 20-30 vs 20-30 30-40 vs 30-40 40-50 vs 40-50
0.99 0.95 0.78 0.76 0.95 0.86 0.68 0.50 0.79 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.91
646 647
42
648 649
Table 5 Significant area between soil moisture and temperature, relative humidity, and
650
precipitation in the 0-10 and 40-50 cm soil depths for farmland and grassland, respectively. Significant area
Depth (cm) 0-10
40-50
Farmland 0.18 0.36 0.44 0.24 0.29 0.39
Soil moisture vs temperature vs relative humidity vs precipitation Soil moisture vs temperature vs relative humidity vs precipitation
651 652
43
Grassland 0.12 0.49 0.41 0.18 0.18 0.50
653
Highlights
654
(1) Investigated depth persistence of temporal pattern of soil moisture.
655
(2) Correlation coefficient decreased with increasing distance between
656 657 658 659 660 661
soil layers. (3) Soil layer had a higher effect on similarity of soil moisture than land use. (4) Precipitation and relative humidity affected soil moisture at large scales. (5) Scale-dependence information was useful for soil moisture prediction.
662
44