Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol.
ELSEVIER
& Biol. Psychiat. 2001, Vol. 25, pp. 519-533 Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Sclence Inc. Pnnted m the USA. All rights reserved 0278-5846/01/S-see front matter
PII: S 0 2 7 8 - 5 8 4 6 1 0 0 ) 0 0 1 8 4 - 6
SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF CLOZAPINE, CLOMIPRAMINE AND THEIR METABOLITES BY R E V E R S E D - P H A S E LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY LIONELLA PALEGO, LILIANA DELL'OSSO, DONATELLA MARAZZITI. LUCIANO BIONDI, NANNINA SARNO, ANTONIO CIAPPARELLI. ANNALISA GIROMELLA, GINO GIANNACCINI, ANTONIO LUCACCHINI and GIOVANNI B. CASSANO Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Biotechnology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy (Final form, March 2001)
Abstract
Palego, Lionella, Liliana Dell'Osso, Donatella Marazziti, Luciano Biondi, Nannina Sarno, Antonio Ciapparelli, Annalisa Giromella, Gino Giannaccini, Antonio Lucacchini and Giovanni Battista Cassano: Simultaneous analysis of clozapine, clomipramine and their metabolites by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol, Psychiat. 2001,25,pp. 519-538.~Y2001El~erSc~nceInc. i. The authors present here a sensitive and rapid reversedphase liquid chromatographic method which enables the simultaneous analysis in plasma of two different drugs and their metabolites: the atypical neuroleptic clozapine and the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine. 2, Samples and the internal standard (dibenzepine) were extracted through an automated solid-phase procedure, evaporated to dryness and injected into the chromatograph, Mobile phase was a mixture of water and acetonitrile (63:37, v:v) containing TEMED and triethylamine. The total chromatographic time was of 14 min and analyte peaks were detected by means of an ultraviolet spectrophotometer preset at 254 nm. 3, Results revealed an assay sensitivity of 5 Mg/L for clozapine or norclozapine and of i0 ~g/L for clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine, Recoveries for these drugs and their metabolites were more than 60% and their coefficient of variation (within day and day-to-day) ranged from 1.3 % to 2.5 %. In spiked plasma, within day and day-to-day coefficients of variability (CV) were less than 5%, The simultaneous evaluation of these two drugs with adequate sensitivity and precision makes it particularly useful for therapeutic drug monitoring during mona- or polypharmacotherapy,
519
L. Palego et al.
520
Kevwords:
clomipramine, clozapine, their demethylated dibenzepine, reversed-phase liquid chromatography
metabolites,
Abbreviations: obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), photodiode array detector (PDA). reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC). selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) Introduction
The
use
of
atypical
clozapine
(@Leponex).
serotonin
reuptake
fluoxetine,
current
of as
well
as
et al,
In
clomipramine tricyclic 1980:
mood
concurrent
(McDougle
et al,
clozapine
or exacerbate
1994:
exists
al,
1993:
drug-drug
concerning
clozapine
and
analytical
Biondi
drug
of
clozapine of
et
al.
Montgomery, for
during
1996).
treatment
to clomipramine
As very
However,
few
the
by adverse information
interactions
between
and Hedenmalm,1996). rapid
and
two
it
and sensitive
clomipramine
these
OCD
disorders
et al.
may be tempered
(Spigset
with
to precipitate
1999).
of a simple,
monitoring
1995:
approach
Steinert
al,
et al.
employed
(Marks
spectrum
pharmacological
to dispose
features
commonly
symptoms
et
Frankeburg,
Cassano
positively
interaction,
clomipramine
subwith
drugs
for
the
during
treatment.
Normal the
the
technique
therapeutic patient
responds
and
a potential
of polypharmacotherapy
and
could be useful
are
which
some
clozapine
useful
1994:
has revealed
becoming
of
OCD
psychotic
Fuchs.
is
of
et al.
a
obsessive-compulsive
for schizophrenia usefulness
cases,
potent
psychotic
treating
1988: Piccinelli some
as
fluvoxamine.
1991:
one of the most
Moreover,
et
with
et al,
(@Anairanil),
with
effects
disorders
combination
in
highly
(Baldessarini
for
such
schizophrenia
particular,
be,
patients
the
pharmacotherapy
McElroy
antidepressants
may
(Tejera
to
sertraline
symptoms
1990;
Zohar et al,
1996),
the
drugs,
clomipramine,
and
for
negative
(Calabrese 1997),
addition
neuroleptic-refractory
predominant 1991),
in
inhibitors
paroxetine
increasingly types
antipsychotic
and most
reversed-phase published
liquid
techniques
chromatographic for
detecting
methods these
S i m u l t a n e o u s a n a ~ s i s o f c l o ~ p i n e , c l o m i p r a m i n e a n d t h e i r metabolites
compounds
(Godbillon
Volpicelli the
et
al,
analysis
of
metabolites A
and Gauron,
1993), a
single
in biological
RPLC
method
quantitative
with
and
Hating
they were
specific
here.
standard,
starting
by
clozapine
and
UV
detection of
for
the
clozapine,
using
1988;
and
to its
that
plasma as
by
has
the
previously
metabolites
simultaneous norclozapine.
in
dibenzepine
from
their
al,
limited
compound
desmethylclomipramine
developed
et
all
fluids,
analysis
clomipramine
1981;
although
521
been
internal
described
Weigmann
and
for
Hiemke
(1992). Methods
Druas
All
reagents
Distilled
were
water
of
analytical-grade
(Sigma
acetonitrile
(Riedel-de
(J,T, Backer,
Deventer,
Chemical Haen,
tetramethylethylenediamine (Milan,
Italy),
Holland)
and
Dibenzepine (Milan.
acetic
(the
internal
from
from
(Rome, obtained
provided
(Milan,
RBI
desmethylclomipramine
Italy);
(Milan, were
Italy);
gifts
from
Sigma
(Deventer,
was
from
standard)
methanol
Backer
Merck
Italy)
N,N,N',N'-
obtained
J.T.
better,
and
clozapine was generously
Institute
purchased
FRG)
was
from
acid
or
Milan,
were HPLC grade.
(TEMED)
triethylamine
Italy);
Research
Seelze,
Holland)
(RG]
Co.,
Italy). from
RBI
by Sandoz
norclozapine
was
clomipramine
and
Novartis
(Milan,
Italy), The
stock
prepared months. of
solution
in methanol
and
the
internal
stored
at
standard
-20°C
for
(1 g/L) less
From this stock solution a working standard
dibenzepine
1:50
of
was
in methanol
obtained
to yield
a
by diluting
than
6
solution
the stock
final dibenzepine
was
solution
concentration
of 20 mg/L, Stock prepared
standard in
solutions
methanol
and
of
analytes
stored
at
(I g/L)
-20°C.
were
Working
also
plasma
L. Pale~ e t a l .
522
standards stock
solutions
solution and
(drug-free
spiked
with
drug-free
as
follows:
1:4
were
plasma
of i mg/L of clozapine,
desmethylclomipramine.
diluted
plasma)
This
made to
by
yield
norclozapine, solution
(250 Ng/L);
diluting a
was
then
1:20(50
final
clomipramine serially
~g/L)
and
1:40
Model
168
(25 ~g/L).
AeDaratus A
Model
116
photodiode
liquid
array
chromatograph
detector
(PDA)
Instrument,
Milan,
system
chromatography
for
Gold
PC,
were
performed column
used
at
(5
Italy), for
20-22°C
~m
Chromatography
the
division
from
by
250
package
x
4.6
diameter)
mm
5.0)
Analysis
were
reversed-phase C18
Milan,
210A
(Beckman)
phase extraction, a
Speedvac
isocratic 1.5
trap
liter,
(Savant)
(Savant,
separation
ml/min
i00 M1
loop
(Beckman).
samples were essicated
centrifuge
condensation at
and
was
linked
RT4104)
performed
flow-rate.
Mobile
a
by
The
injection For
to dryness to
preset
phase
(Waters
Italy),
chromatograph was also fitted with a manual sample valve
Beckman
(version
Symmetry
Millipore,
(Beckman
the
chromatography. a
of
a
Beckman
managed
software
with
particles
all
both
and
solidthrough
refrigerated
at
pumping
-80°C. mobile
composition
The phase
was
per
370 ml of acetonitrile and 630 ml of distilled water,
containing adjusted
0.5 %
(v:v) TEMED
and 0,01%
to pH 6.5 with acetic
and Hiemke,
1992).
acid
The monitoring
(v:v)
triethylamine,
(modified
wavelenght
from Weigmann on the PDA was
254 nm, Experimental Procedure Blood tubes
was withdrawn
from
out-patients psychotic accordingly at
the
in
the morning
fasting drug-free (5 men
features to DSM
and (n=8)
5 women) or
OCD
IV diagnostic
"Dipartimento
di
into
lithium
healthy volunteers with
mood
(n=l)
or
criteria,
Psichiatria,
and
heparin from i0
disorders anorexia 1994,
with (n=l),
recruited
Neurobiologia,
Simultaneousanalysisofclo~pine, clomipramineandtheir metabolites Farmacologia patients the
e Biotecnologie"
gived
study,
their
The
patients,
(mean ± S,E.M.), doses
of
of
whose
(Table
and
only
(Table
collected
12-15
hours
i).
until
the
solid-phase
plasma
sample
reversed
were
mixed
and
wad
its
at
The
this
by
cartridges of
were
water:
washed
Weigmann
of
internal through Italy),
samples
5% methanol
The
plasma
conditioned
with
(I ml) in water
1 ml of methanol.
was
evaporate
to
dryness
for 45 min at 45°C through
was
and
1 ml
correct
then,
with
For
(Waters).
to
at
slightly
Milan,
order
in
weeks. a
then passed
added
were
centrifuged
20 ~g/L
Waters,
to a refrigerated
residue of
and
taking
and stored
two
the
the
receiving
metabolites.
of
(Oasis,
after
blood
employed
described
years
were
and
processor
eluate
~i
intake
in
constant
were
collected within
50 Ml
1 ml
samples
linked
I00
1.98
days
2
automated
cartridges
centrifuge
phase.
±
patient's
last
and
with
Oasis
and
final
-80°C,
of
was
that
drugs were eluted with
The
30,2 12
All
introduced
patients
authors
clozapine
sample
methanol
centrifugating
of Pisa,
be
while
performed the
from
for recovery.
loaded
the
cartridges
a
Five
(I Mg dibenzepine)
standard
of
(v:v):
was
phase on
internal 1 ml
for
solution
mounted levels
assay,
procedure (1992)
than
ml
Plasma
extraction,
Hiemke
to
was
more
I0
after
at 3,000 x g for i0 min,
standard
I)
clomipramine,
clozapine
modified
age
the pharmacotherapy,
clozapine
-20°C
consent
were at the steady state receiving
clozapine
beginning both
of the U n i v e r s i t y
informed
523
condensation
dissolved
suspension
in
were
600
by
a Speedvac trap preset
~i
injected
of
mobile
into
the
chromatograph. Statistical Standard
Analysis calibration
four different compounds) software
curves
concentrations
were
obtained
(Beckman)
from
the
for (25,
by
analytes 50,
means
250 and of
least-squares
the
in
plasma
I000 ~g/L Gold
linear
at of
system
regression
L. P a l e g o
524
of
the
peak
height
(dibenzepine)
Plasma L e v e l s
ratios
versus
of
~ al.
the
analyte/internal
standard
the known amount of the analytes.
in P a t i e n t s Taking C l o z a p i n e
(CL) and C l o m i p r a m i n e
(CMI).
Dose
CL
NCL
(~L)
(~grL)
1.72
122
33
0.27
1.40
30
10
0.33
40
1.17
149
20
0.13
169
5.20
297
92
0.31
389
5.80
395
86
0.21
481
Cn*
Dose
CMI*
ratio
Sum
(~gIL)
CMI
DCMI
ratio
(~g/L)
(~grL)
Sum
(~L)
155
2.40
0.96
100
32
0.32
132
98
121
1.23
0.12
0.73
203
14
0.07
217
67
71
1.05
138
1.95
3.12
41
32
0.78
73
222
165
0.74
387
1.76
0.60
13
21
1.60
34
141
115
0.81
256
139
1.11
262
197
176
0.89
47.9 ±
0.51 ±
195 ±
145±
129 ±
0.94 ±
274 ±
13 °
0.16 °
47 °
29 °
19 °
0.09 °
47 °
3.05
0.83
2.5 ±
1.25 ±
123
0.56 °
0.47 °
147
±
38 °
219
373
*Doses are mg per day of clozapine or c l o m i p r a m i n e / K g body weight, °Data in bold represent the mean ± S,E,M, of the correspondent column values. NCL = N o r c l o z a p i n e and DCMI = N-desmethylclomipramine, Results
In Table standard
2, r e t e n t i o n
are
potentially interference
interferring was
had been tested, retention < 0,5%
times
reported,
observed
of all
together
analytes
with
psychotropic for
any
drug
and
those drugs, or
internal of
other Minimal
metabolite
Within and between run v a r i a n c e
(CV) of
that the
time of the a n a l y t e s and the internal s t a n d a r d was
(data not shown),
Simultaneousana~sisofclo~pine, clomipramineandtheir metaboli~s 2
Tabl~
Potential
Time
Interferences
Drug Dibenzepine
Retention time 2.80
Diazepam
3.29
Norelozapine
3.50
Desmethyldiazepam
3.92
Paroxetine
5.19
Haloperidol
5.72
Fluvoxamine
6.49
Nortriptyline
6.64
Imipramine
6.74
Clozapine
7.12
Norfluoxetine
8.67
Fluoxetine
Drugs
were
mg/L)
and
detection
The
9.81
Desmethylclomipramine
10.91
Clorpromazine
11.02
Clomipramine
13.82
injected evaluated
as
extracted
through
the
spiked
plasma
reported
method
samples with
(I
U.V
at 254 nm.
analytical
recovery
spiked with
two different
~g/L)
the
and
efficiencies
were
ranging
1.3
from
dibenzepine,
from
for norclozapine, and
525
was
measured
concentrations
internal
standard
constant
(I
(coefficient
to
2.5)
and
93
to 96 %
averaged for
in drug-free
plasma
of analytes
(50-250
mg/L). of from
clozapine,
Extraction
variation, 89 from
to 95
CV
92%
for
to
99%
from 77 to 93% for N - d e s m e t h y l c l o m i p r a m i n e
from 72 to 80% for c l o m i p r a m i n e
526
L. Palego et al.
Detection
Limit
Figure
i
drug-free
shows
a
control
typical
plasma
dibenzepine
(DBZ,
background,
without
chromatogram
spiked
img/L).
with
The
the
internal
baseline
contaminant
obtained shows
a
from
a
standard very
low
of about
4:1)
plasma peaks.
0,03 .....
"
i
0,025 ?
:
I
0,02
,~ 0,015 < 0,01 0,005
0
5
10
15
time, m;-
Fig, i: Blank plasma extract spiked with the internal standard (img/L) DBZ: Dibenzepine
The was
detection
assessed
extract
by
limit
(signal
analyzing
and was of 5 ~g/L
of i0 ~g/L
and
i000
~g/L.
curves
they were From
were
linear
linear
to noise
ratio
replicates
for clozapine
for clomipramine
Calibration weeks
15
of
blank
plasma
and norclozapine
and
and N-desmetilclomipramine,
evaluated
repeatdly,
in the analysed
regression
range
analysis
mean
over
two
from 25 to slope
(±
Simultaneous analysisofclozapine, clomipramineandtheir S.D,) 5.1
and
intercept
± 0.3
for
clozapine
0.4 for n o r c l o z a p i n e for
clomipramine
0.9993)
(± S.D,)
values
(r= 0.9994);
(r= 0.9997);
(r=
were:
0.9992):
711
2560
3141
metabolites
1065
527
± 45.8
± 25.6
and
and
12.1
±
± 156.6 and 5.4 ± 0.2
± 97
and
8,1
± 0.I
(r=
for desmethylclomipramine.
Accuracy and P r e c i s i o n M e t h o d ' s a c c u r a c y and p r e c i s i o n were d e t e r m i n e d of plasma
from d r u g - f r e e
healthy volunteers
different
concentrations
of all
analytes
and
medium
corresponding
to
Intra-assay
concentrations. running
15
low
replicates
assay v a r i a t i o n for 15 days
was
per
established
spiked
(50 and
with
was
per
by running
plasma
evaluated
run.
two
300 Ng/L),
analyte
variation specimen
in a pool
while
by
inter-
two runs per day
(Table 3). The CV range was between
2.3 and 4,9.
I n t r a - A s s a y and I n t e r - A s s a y V a r i a t i o n of A n a l y t e Plasma L e v e l s
Inter-Assay (n = 15)
Intra-Assay (n = 15 )
Mean, mg/L (4- SD)
(CV, %)
50 4- 2
(4.5)
514- 2.3
(4.5)
298 4- 9.5
(3.2)
302 4- 13
(4.4)
51 ± 1.8
(4.6)
51 4- 2.5
(4.9)
Clozapine
Norclozapine
Mean, mg/L (± SD)
(CV,%)
302 + 8.0
(2.6)
301 ± 14.
(4.8)
Cl0mipramine
55 4- 2.4
(4.5)
49 4- 1.8
(4.6)
301 ± 5.4
(2.3)
300 4- 15
(4.3)
Desmethylelom.
49 4- 1.8
(4.6)
52 :h 2.0
(4.0)
298 4- 12
(4.2)
288 + 9.4
(3.5)
Patient Plasma L e v e l s and Chromatoarams.
Table presented
1 shows as
mg
individual per
day/Kg
and body
mean
values
weight,
of
plasma
drug
doses,
levels
for
L. P a l e ~ etal. 528
each
analyte,
metabolite Figure
the
ratio
metabolite/drug
and
the
sum
+ drug. 2
shows
taking clozapine
a
chromatogram
obtained
from
a
patient
and clomipramine,
0,03
DJ i
0,025 0,02 0,015 0,01 NCL 0,005 0 0
5
10
15
ti.~ (mi.) Fig.2.
Chromatogram
patient
in Table
i.
desmethylclomipramine:
This method
paper for
high
detection, clozapine single
rather phase,
specific
previously
their metabolites is increasingly
of schizophrenia,
time-consuming UV
determination
of
and
wavelenght
sensitive of
metabolites
The methods
although
and
determination
liquid
clomipramine sub-types
a
simultaneous
and their desmethyl
compounds~
that
the
last N-
NCL=Norclozapine.
performance and
to
CL=Clozapine:CMI=Clomipramine;DCMI=
reports
the
clomipramine by
corresponding
reported
clozapine.
in human plasma
chromatography were
analytical
using
for clomipramine,
built
for detection
combination
of
used
treatment
in the
and mood expensive and/or
of each compound,
clozapine
disorders, to
UV
change
analytical this method
of
Since assay column
of and
some it is
mobile for
can considerably
Simultaneousana~sisofclo~pine, clomipramineandtheir metabolites improve
the
study
interactions.The that
proposed
alone,
but
of
clozapine
method
by
we
and
described
Weigmann
and
introduced
clomipramine
here
is quite
Hiemke
some
(1992)
drug-drug similar
for
modifications
529
to
clozapine
in
order
to
obtain also a good detection of clomipramine, Solid-phase modified
extraction
from Weigmann and Hiemke
work of our research pak
cartridges
group
were
cartridges
significantly for
have
obtained
been
consuming, acetic
since
the drugs,
filled
with
we
instead
of
which
1 ml
a
(Haring
et
al,
1988:
1993).
SSRIs
increase
(approximately Kabra
et al,
loss
of
their from
1981).
method
compensated
Weigmann
We
chose
slightly
2 ml acid
In
order
to
separating
column
(Waters)
improving
symmetry
(data not shown), for
UV
detection
of
for this compound at 254 nm
absorbance to 215
the time-
C18
and Hiemke, in
nm)
1992;
for
the
(Walace
to preset
sensitivity
by
was
some authors suggest
200
which
for
particles,
methods
Conversely,
extraction
raise
Symmetry
clozapine report maximum average et al,
Oasis
Moreover,
methanol,
usually
silica
described
of
used was more
of sample elution
employed
where Sep-
analyte
method,
previously
of peaks and method's sensitivity Previously
the
previous
the volume
synthetic
2000),
and desmethylclomipramine
the
problems
slightly
introduction
improved
procedure
in methanol
resolve basic
by
been
(1992) and from a previous
The
clomipramine
evaporation
has
(Palego et al,
used.
recoveries sample
procedure
Volpicelli
that TCAs and
far
UV
the PDA
at
clomipramine
concentrating
region
and Dahl,
the
1967:
254
has
sample
nm: been
before
injection, Extraction recoveries values
as
were
(Godbillon Volpicelli
procedure well in
and
the
as
highly
within range
Gauron,
et al,
was
of
1981;
1993),The
day
reproducible and
those Weigmann
and
day-to-day reported and
sample
precison by
Hiemke.
others 1992:
limit of detection was of 5 ~g/L
for clozapine and norclozapine,
and of i0 ~g/L
for the other
L. Ps]e~ etaL
530
analytes, more
indicating
than
that
adequate
for
the sensitivity
the
therapeutic
of the method was drug
monitoring
of
these compounds, Blank
plasma
Chromatograms clomipramine separation, 2.5-15
revealed
obtained and
showed
interferences
retention
norclozapine
clean
range.
(1991)
and Perry et al,
those
reported
by Volpicelli
higher
norclozapine
should
be
that
column
(1991),
the
discrepancy.
these
Since
if
cotreatment
greater
with
number
of
and Gauron
(1981)
interference other
TCAs
with was
investigate
patients
and will
with
have
used and
from found
However, a
it
different
were
able
which may account of
patients
which
may
to for
taking
clarify plasma (1990),
or
this
produce
involving this
a
point,
concentrations by Godbillon
No
significant
benzodiazepines,
makes
mono-
clozapine
those observed
Mavissakalian
in
who
investigations,
phenothiazines, found,
Lovedahl
we were not able to determine
patients,
and
as
with
ratio.
C-6)
number
Further
consistent
and
while differing
and
Clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine were also quite
the
well
authors
clomipramine
interactions.
of
in
clozapine
(1993),
levels,
the
clozapine alone was too small, drug-drug
al.
(Spherisorb
measure also clozapine-N-oxide
degree
as
et
with
peaks
consistent
concentrations
considered
chromatographic
good
other
plasma
concentrations
norclozapine/clozapine ratio were
extract.
treated
a
with
Our
et al.
plasma
patients
clozapine,
without
min
a from
method
SSRIs
or
useful
to
polypharmacotherapy
with
these drugs, In conclusion, patient's
clinical
this method will response,
effects due to pharmacological facilitate
the investigation
correlations response,
between
analyte
enable
compliance
the monitoring and
interactions. of more plasma
potential
This method may
throughly levels
of
side
and
the possible therapeutic
Simultaneous analysis of clozapine, clomipramine and their metabolites
531
Conclusions The method
present which
clomipamine desmethyl
paper
enable plasma
reports levels
metabolites
a simple
the measurement as
well
in patients
and
rapid
ol either as
during
their
analytical
clozapine
or
respective
the pharmacological
treatment.
Ref@rencss AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, Committee on nomenclature & Statistic: Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, IV Edition, American Psycbiatric Association Washington DC 1994. BALDESSARINI R,J., and FRANKENBURG Clozapine: A novel antipsychotic agent, N. 324; 746-54.
F,R., (1991) Engl. J. Med,,
BIONDI M, FEDELE L, ARCANGELI T, and PANCHERI P (1999) Development of obsessive-compulsive symptoms during clozapine treatment in schizophrenia and its positive response to clomipramine. Psychother Psychosom, 68:111-2. CALABRESE J,R., MELTZER H,Y., and MARKOVITZ Clozapine prophylaxis in rapid cycling bipolar Clin, Psychopharmacol., 10: 48-50.
P,J., (1990 disorder. J
CASSANO G~B., CIAPPARELLI A., and VILLA A., (1997 Clozapine as a treatment tool: only in resistant schizophrenics?, Eur, Psychiatry, 12: 347s-51s, CENTORRINO F,, BALDESSARINI R.J,, FLOOD J,G.~ KANDO J.C,, and FRANKENBURG F.R,, (1995) Relation ol leukocyte counts during clozapine treatment to serum concentrations of clozapine and metabolites, Am, J, Psychiatry 152, ~: 6102. CENTORRINO F., B A L D E S S A R I N I R.J., F R A N K E N B U R G F~R,, KANDO J., VOLPICELLI S,A~, and FLOOD J.G,, (1996) Serum levels of clozapine and norclozapine in patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, Am. J. Psychiatry~ 153, ~: 820-2. FUCHS DC (1994) Clozapine treatment of bipolar in a young adolescent. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 33:1299-302 GODBILLON clomipramine
J., or
and GAURON imipramine
S., and
(1981) their
disorder
Determination of mono-demethylated
:532
L. Palego et al.
metabolites in human liquid chromatography,
blood or plasma by J, Chromatogr,, 204:
high-performance 303-311.
HARING C., H U M P E L C.. AUER B., SARIA A,, BARNAS C., ELEISCHACKER W., and HINTERHUBER H (1988) Clozapine plasma levels determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, J. Chromatogr,, 428, 160-66, KABRA P,M., MAR N,A,, and MARTON Simultaneous liquid chromatographic amitriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine, doxepin and nordoxepin, Clin, Chimica Acta,
L.J,, (1981) analysis of desipramine, iii: 123-32.
LOVEDAHL M.J,, PERRY P,J, and MILLER D,D,, (1991) The assay of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography,Ther. Drug Monitor. 13: 69-72, MARKS I,, STERN R., MAWSON D,, COBB J, and MC DONALD R (1980) Clomipramine and exposure for obsessive compulsive rituals, Br. J, Psychiatry, 136:1-25, MC DOUGLE CJ, GOODMAN WK, and PRICE LH (1994) Dopamine antagonists in tic-related and psychotic spectrum obsessive compulsive disorder J Clin Psychiatry 55 Suppl:24-31 MC ELROY S.L., DESSEIN E,C,, POPE H.G.Jr,, COLE J,O., KECK P.E., FRANKENBURG F.R., AIZLEY HG, and O'BRIEN S (1991) Clozapine in the treatment of psychotic mood disorders, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. J, Clin. Psychiatry, 52: 411-4, MONTGOMERY S.A., (1996) obsessive-compulsive'disorder, ll(Suppl.5): 23-29,
Long-term management of Int, Clin, Psychopharmacol,,
MAVISSAKALIAN M . , JONES B . , OLSON S , , and PEREL J,M., (1990) The relationship of plasma clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine to response in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Psychopharmacol. Bull., 26: 119-22. PALEGO L, MARAZZITI D, BIONDI L, GIANNACCINI G, SARNO N, ARMANI A, LUCACCHINI A, CASSANO GB, and DELL'OSSO L, (2000) Simultaneous plasma level analysis of clomipramine, ndesmethylclomipramine and fluvoxamine by reversed-phase liquid chromatography, Ther Drug Monitoring.22:lg0-94, PERRY P.J, MILLER D.D. , ARNDT S,V,, and CADORET R.J,, [1991) Clozapine and norclozapine plasma c o n c e n t r a t i o n s and clinical response of treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients. Am.J.Psychiatry, 148:231-5. PICCINELLI M, PINI S, BELLANTUONO C, and WILKINSON G,, (1995) Efficacy of drug treatment in obsessive-compulsive disorder, A meta-analytic review. Br J Psychiatry, 166:42443.
Simultaneous analysis of clozapine, clomipramine and their metabolites
533
RIHMER Z., BARSI J., BELSO N., PESTALITY P,, and GYORGY S., (1996) Antidepressant-induced hypomania in obsessive compulsive disorder. Int. Clin, Psychopharmacol,, ii, i: 203-5, STEINERT T, SCHMIDT-MICHEL PO, and KASCHKA WP (1996) Considerable improvement in a case of obsessive-compulsive disorder in an emotionally unstable personality disorder, borderline type under treatment with clozapine. Pharmacopsychiatry 29:111-4 SPIGSET O, and HEDENMALM treatment with clomipramine study of therapeutic drug Psychopharmacol 16:412-4 TEJERA CA, Clomipramine schizophrenia.
K
(1996) Hyponatremia during perphenazine, or clozapine: monitoring samples, J Clin
MAYERHOFF DI and RAMOS-LORENZI J (1993) for obsessive-compulsive symptoms in J Clin Psychopharmacol 13:290-1
VOLPICELLI S.A., CENTORRINO F . , PUOPULO P . R . , KANDO J , , FRANKENBURG F . R . , BALDESSARINI R , J , and FLOOD JG [ 1 9 9 3 ) Determination of c l o z a p i n e , norclozapine and c l o z a p i n e - N o x i d e i n s e r u m by l i q u i d chromatography, Clin. Chem, 39: 1656-59. WEIGMANN H,, and HIEMKE C., (1992) Determination of clozapine and its major metabolites in human serum using automated solid-phase extraction and subsequent isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, J, Chromatogr., 583: 209-216. WALACE J.E., and DAHL E.V., (1967) The determination of amitriptyline by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. J, Forensic Sci, , 12: 484-496, ZOHAR J., INSEL T.R,, ZOHAR-KADOUCH R,C,, HILL J,, and MURPHY D.L., (1988) Serotonergic responsivity in obsessivecompulsive disorder: effect of chronic clomipramine treatment. Arch, Gen, Psychiatry, 45: 167-172. Inouiries and renrint reouests should be addrsssed Dr, Lionella Palego, Dipartimento di Psichiatria, Biotecnologie University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56100-I, Pisa,
Neurobiologia, Italy,
to:
Farmacologia
e