SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH ABSORPTION

SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH ABSORPTION

1995,15(4) :431-441 vd'atheThiacta!7cientia l~tmJl~fIl SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH ABSORPTION· Zhao Junning(~1~~) De...

835KB Sizes 0 Downloads 64 Views

1995,15(4) :431-441

vd'atheThiacta!7cientia

l~tmJl~fIl SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH ABSORPTION· Zhao Junning(~1~~) Dept. of Math. , Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China.

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the existence and nonexistence of singular solutions for a

porous medium equations with convection and absorption terms.

Key words

1

Convection diffusion equation, singular solution, existence and nonexistence.

Introduction Consider the Cauchy problem u,

=

L1u

u(x,O)

where m

>

l,p

m

+ -ad-b;(u) a";

= 0

> 0, and b.Cs)

x

E C

1

-

u"

in ST = R N X (O,T),

(1.1)

E RN\{O},

(1.2)

(R ) .

Equation (1. 1) arises from many applications. We will not recall them here, since they can be found in many papers, for example in [IJ [2J. The case when the initial datum is a measure is also a model for physical phenomena (see [3 J [4 J). For the case b.Cu')

= 0, it was shown in [5J and [6J respectively, that if m > 1,0 < p < m

+ ~, the

problem (1. 1) (1. 2) has a solution which satisfies the initial condition u(x,0)=8(x),

where 8(x) denotes the Dirac mess. concentrated at the origin and that if p

(1.3)

>

m

+~,

the problem (1.1) (1.3) has no solution. In addition, it was shown in [7J and [8J that for b.Cu') = 0, max {l ,m}

< p < m < ~ O. 1) -

O. 2) has a very singular solution, i,

e. a solution w with the following properties w

E C(Sr\{ (O,O)})

w(x,O)

=

0

if

x

(1.4)

E RN\{O}

• Received Apr. 13,1992. Supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China.

(1.5)

432

ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA

lim t-O+

I

w(x,t)dx

Ixl
=

+

00,

for every r

Vol. 15

> o.

(1.6)

=

t1cp(u) - u" some similar results have

For the general porous medium equation u,

been obtained in [9J by using a method different to that in [7J[8J. In this paper, we are interested in the effect of the convection term aCht on the exis~t

tence and nonexistence of singular solutions to Cauchy problem (1. 1) - (1. 2). For the case m'

=

l,b;(u)

=

uq ,

J. Aguirre, M. Escobeto[lO] and W. Liu[lO] proved that if 1 < p <

1

+ ~ and 1 < q < 1 + ~, O. 1) , O. 3) has a unique solution and that if p > 1 + ~ and

1

< q<

p

t

1, O. 1) O. 2) has no singular soluton and that if 1 < p

~ p ~ 1 , then

(1. 1)

O.

< 1 + ~, 1 < q

2) has a very singular solution. Here we use the method simi-

lar to that in [9J to improve and generalize the results in [10-IIJ. We assume that Ib~(s)

I<

Msq-l

if s

> o.

(1.7)

We shall prove the following theorems. Suppose that (1.7) holds and let 0 < p

Theorem 1

< m + N2

0
+ N2 .

Then (1. 1) (1. 3) has a solution. Theorem 2

Suppose that (1.7) holds and let p ~ m

+

2 N' 0

mN+ 1 nN + 2 P ·


Then (1. 1) (1. 3) has no solution. Theorem 3


Suppose that (1.7) holds and let m

2 N' 0 < q

< p.

Then

(1.1) (1.2) has a very singular solution. Suppose that (1.7) holds and let p

Theorem 4

2 > m + N' 0< q < p -

1

N. Then

(1.1) (1.2) has no very singular solution. Clearly, for the case m

= 1,

b, = u" , Theorem 1- Theorem 4 weakened the condi-

tions of index q in [10J [11J.

2

Proof of Theorem 1 Definition 2. 1

A solution u of (1. 1), (1. 3) is a nonnegative function defined in Sr

such that 1.

2.

u

E

It

T

3.

lim t-O+

Ll(Sr)

(1/.u

I

n LtXJ(R

+ /iTJum -

N

X (r,T))

n C(Sr\{(O,O)}), for every

t:

E

bi(u)1/Zi - TJuP)dxdt = 0, for every 1/ E Q(8T )

u(x,t)¢(x)dx

=

¢(O), for every ¢

RN

E

c: (R

N

(O,T), ,

) .

We first discuss the solutions of equation (1.1) with initial date

u(x,O)

= kNh(kx)

(2.1)

No.4

Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION

where h(x) E' C';' (R N )

,

h(x)

>

I

0,

RN

= 1,

h(x)dx

433

> o.

k

Such solutions are defined as in Definition 2. 1. Without loss of generalities, in the following context, we use C to denote the constants independent of k , although they may change from line to line in the same proof. In this section we suppose that the hypotheses of Theorm 1 are satisfied. Denote BR(xo)

Lemma 2.1

=

{x E R N

I<

R}.

The problem (1.1) (2.1) have a nonnegative solution u, E LOCJ(ST)

C(ST) which satisfies

I

RN

Proof

Ix - Xo

:

Uk(x,t)dx

+

II

S,

ufdxdt

<

n

1.

We consider the approximte problem of (1. 1) (2.1) u,

= Llum + ~b;(u) aXt

-

uP

+ (l)P
in B; X (O,T),

(2.3)

on Ixl = n,

u(x,t) = (l)N+l n

(2.2)

(2.4) It is well known that (2. 2) - (2. 4) has a unique classical solution U,tn and (l)N+1 n

<

< B(k),

Ukn

where B(k) is a constant independent of n, By [12J, for every compact set K CST' the {Ukn} is ~quicontinuous on K . Thus we can select a subsequence from {u,tn} , which denotes again by {u,tn} , such that for any compact set K C ST U,tn -. u,

as n -.

(X)

in C(K).

It is easy to verify that u, is a solution of (1. 1) (2. 1). Set o., Vkn

+ 1J)2

----1

(vin

Notice that

=

Ukn -

(l )N+l, n

so that o.;

=

Ix I

0 on

n, We multiply (2. 2) by

. . over B n X (0 , T) . an d Integrate It

rJ =rJ

a':: bi(Ui.)

JOB.; JOB.

~~Jv"b~(s

CAL; 0

(vin

Vi.

+ 1J) 2: 1

dxdt

+ (l)N+l) n

(S2

s

1dsdxdt

+ 1J) 2

=o.

Using an analogous argument with Lemma 2. 1 in [9J, we can prove Lemma 2. 1. u,

>

Without loss of generalities, in the following lemmas, we assume u, E C 2 (ST) and 0. Otherwise we consider the approximate problem

434

ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA

Lemma 2. 2

The solution UJ. of (1.1) (2.1) satisfies

[J o

where 0

< a<

Proof

Vol. 15

min {~, m

Let ~(x)

E

BR(x

(uJ.)m+~-adxdt <

+~-

q} and C(a) is a constant independent of

C~(B2R(XO))'

< ~<

0

1, ~ = 1 if

+ U~)-1~2 and integrate over ST to obtain

(1.1) by u~(1

sa 2 -1 adx~ dx RN o · S

JJ = - [J

+

UIt ( X . T }

o

R

N

(2.6)

C(a)

O)

+ (m

4ma

a )2

-

x

Xo

and k •

E BR(xo). We multiply

[J 0

ui a m-a 2 2 2 RN (1 + UJ.a)21 \1UJ. I ~ dxdt

-2u: +1 a\I UJ.m • \I ~~dxdt - 2JTJ N u, 0 R

J"'. b (s) 1 +sa I

i

0

-;ds~~x.dxdt

S

I

Using Schwarz's inequality, we get m-a ~ dxdt [JR +uiau~)21 \1ui21
o

N

2

(1

o

R

1

N

0

R

N

~ I \I ~ Iuidxdt,

where the hypotheses (1. 7) is used. Let UJ.l = max{uJ.,l}.

Then by Sobolev's imbedding inequality (see [13

[J o

R

N

2 ~2U!1+N-adxdt~
J

O
p74J)

2JTJ Uk1dx}N. 0

B ZR

R

N

m-a 1\I(~uiT)12dxdt.

Notice that

[LN¢frurl+-k-adxdt
{I + [LN¢fr-2Ui'I+adxdt + [LN¢2 r-l u:dxdt}

{[JRN¢2rU';1+N-adxdt ,-~
This implies

2

0

2

(2.7)

Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION

No.4

435

and Lemma 2. 2 is proved. Lemma 2. 3

The solution (1.1) (2. 1) satisfies

(2.8)

where C·

(p

=

Proof

11)

p':) •

Since C* t" p2.} is a solution of (1. 1) by comparison principle we can obtain

(2.8).

For every ball B R (x o ) C R N \ {O} and 0 <

Lemma 2. 4

r

< 1 + ~ the solution u, of

(1. 1) (2. 1) satisfies

(2. 9) and

(2.10)

Proof

Let~(x)EC~(RN), O<~
tiply (1.1) by ~2U~(Y Y

>

0) and integrate over ST to obtain

+1 1f RNC;eau;r+l (


R

N

X

,t

)d

+ (m4mY + y)2 ftf RNC;e21 \l u,r+m 12d

x

0

u!+r-lUkx.~x.dxds •

2ftf 0



R

N

2

f"i rrb~(r)dr~~x.dxds 0

,

d

s

I

+ - l - f N ~2(kNh(kx))r+ldx Y+ 1 R • Since supp ~ C R N \ {O}, h E C~ (R N )

X

(2.11)

we have

~2kNh(kx)

=

0

if k is large enough. Hence, we obtain from (2.11) that supf ~2ur+l(x,t)dx+[fN ~21\lu:~mI2dxds O
Using the imbedding inequality, we have [of R N

~sur+m+2k+~dxdt 2


N~2ur+ldx + [ f 0

RN

I \l (~u:tr)

12dxdt}1+~ (2. 12)

for some s

>

O.

436

ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA

For t: E (

~,

Vol. 15

1) , set

R = R( r + 1 2 1

1')

1

1

and let ~l be a cutoff function in B R1(xo) with ~l 2 Denote 1 N by K and choose r such that

=

=

0,1,2,···,

1 on B R1+1 •

+

r= r = N

= 2q

where d

mN

+q - 2 -

+K

d - q m - 1

+K

if q

1

if q

>m,

< m,

1.

We first dicuss the case q

> m,

From (2. 12), we get

I [ojf 1+1ut+KI+1dxdt< { (1 - C 2R2([f.J B

1

r)

R

Ud+K1dXdt+[f ur;-q+d+K1dxdt) }K. oj B R1 1

BR

Without loss of generality, we can assume

[J o

B

ut+K'dxdt

>

for any 1 > 1.

1

R1

and then we have

([L

R

1

K'

+1

1

ut+ + dxdt ) R'dxdt I

1

<

1 2[ f oj

C

(R(l -

Hence the Standard Moser's iteration yields

BrRSX~f.T)U! <

{(O - ;)R)N+2[L

r))

r

ut+ K1d xdt, BR

I

1

Rdxdt

for

t:

1

E (2' 1).

(2. 13)

From (2. 13), we get

Applying Schwarz's inequality, we get 1 sup Ul< 2

B-rRX (O.T)

1

sup u l+C(r){(O_l)R)N+2[f ut+rdxdt}r.

BRX (O.T)

r

0

J

BR

Hence by [14 p161 Lemma 3. IJ, we get

and Lemma 2. 4 when q

>m

is proved.

The proof of (2.9) is similar to the proof of (2. 10). Proof of Theorem 1

By Lemma 2. 2- Lemma 2. 4, q <

m

+ ~ and using an argu-

ment similar to the proof of Theorem 1 in [9J, we can prove Theorem 1.

No.4

3

Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION

437

Proof of Theorem 2 The proof of Theorem 2 proceeds via two lemmas. Let p>m+

Lemma 3.1

~, o
t ~p,

whereqis the constant in 0.7).

Then any solution of (1. 1) (1. 3) satisfies

[J

u/ d xdt

{u~t

+ um~~ - b;(u)~x. - uP~}dxdt =

o BR

<

>

for any R

00,

0

(3.1)

and

[J o

R

N

0,

(3.2)



for any ~ E C~ (R N X (- T, T». Proof

The proof of (3.1) is similar to the proof of Lemma 3.2 in [9J, we omit it.

We now prove (3.2). Let
'b(

+

Ixl 2

where ~(x,t) E C;;" (R N X (- T ,T», Y = m -1 1](s)

= 1 if s > 2,

1](s)

Since for every k

= 0 if S < 1 and

>

1]k(S)

=

t~) ~(x,t)

+ ~ and TJ E C= (R) has the properties: 1](ks).

0,
follows from Definition 2.1 that

[LN(U¢'it

satisfies

u

+ UmLi¢'i -

b,(U)¢'h; - uP¢'i)dxdt = O.

Therefore, it is sufficient to verify that as k --.

00

[J «: ~1]k~dxdt --. 0, [J um~1]k - \J~dxdt--.O, [J b;(U)1]kx.~dxdt--.O. [J o

o

R

R

N

u1]kt~dxdt --. 0,

0

N

R

N

0

R

N



Set Then

[JRNUTJit~dxdt I
I

D

A:

I[LNumLiTJi~dxdtl < CkJL.umdxdt, I[JRNum\lTJi

0

\l~dxdtl < C

I[LNb,(U)TJiz,Uxdtl

<

C

./kHD.umdxdt,

./kJL

uidxdt;

i

Noting that

IDkl =

measure of D,

(mN+2)

= Ck--2-,

(3.3)

438

ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA

Vol. 15

we obtain by means of Holder's inequality

C{JL.uPdxdt}.

k~JL.udxdt =

kJL.Umdxdt = C( JL.UPdxdt)~ . .fkJL.u

9dxdt

< C(JL.uPdxdt) '.

Since

(3. 3) is proved. Similarly to the proof of Lemma 3. 2 in [9J, we can prove the following lemma. Lemma 3. 2

Suppose that

[J o

BR

u

satisfies

uPdxdt

<

for every R

00

> 0,

and

[ ojr

R

N

(uet

+ um~e -

for any

~

E

b.(u)ex .

C~ (R

Then limr N u(x,t)X(x)dx

t-oJ

R

-

upe)dxdt



=

N

=

° (3.4)

X (- T ,T) ) .

° for any X E C~(RN).

By Lemma 3.1- Lemma 3.2 and using an argument similar to that in the proof of' Theorem 2 in [9], we can prove Theorem 2.

4 Proof of Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 We discuss the solution of equation (1.1) with initial data u(x,O)

where h Ca:') E

=

(4. 1)

k N + 1h(kx) ,

C;;'(R h(x) > 0, LNh(X)dx = 1. N

) ,

It is well-known that (1.1) (4.1) has a nonnegative solution u, E LrxJ(O,T;L 1(R N )

)

n C(5

T )

and \lu'; E L 2(B R X

os.r».

Similarly to proof of Lemma 2. 3, we can prove (4.2) Moreover, we have the following estimates. Lemma 4.1 isfies

Let BR(x O ) CRN\{O}. Then the solution of problem (1.1) (4.1) sat-

Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION

No.4

439

(4.3) Let ~ E CC; (R N )

Proof

choose 1J

=

U:~2 (a

a

0 < ~ < 1, ~ (z)

,

> m) in Definition 2. 1 to

r

=

1 if x E B R(xo) , supp ~ C R N \ { 0 }. We

obtain

l l ui+l(x,T)e2dx+ rr uf+ae J JR + JR

=-

+

2dxdt+

N

rr J J ~u:V'~.

2

_1_

a

+

r

IJR N

JrrJR.

N

e2\l ui . \lui

0

rr J J Jr"ib;(s)sads~~x.dxdt

V'u';dxdt - 2

RN

0

N

0

0

R

N

0

r

(k N+ 1 h ( k x ) )a+l~2dx.

(4.4)

Notice that

and kN+1h(kx)

= 0 on supp

~

if k is large enough. From (4. 4) we obtain

rr

J0 JR Since p

N

~2ur+adxdt <

> max {q ,m },

Lemma 4.2

where 0 < r

crr I V'~12u!+adxdt + C + crr I V'~lu1+adxdt. J JR J JR 0

N

N

0

(4.5)

(4. 3) follows from (4. 5), as in the proof of Lemma 2. 2.

Let BR(xo) C RN\{O}. Then the solution u, of (1.1) (4.1) satisfies

< 1+

2 N.

The proof of Lemma 4. 2 is similar to that of Lemma 2. 4. By Lemma 4. 1, Lemma 4. 2, (4. 2) and using an argument similar to that in the proof of Theorem 3 of [9J, we can prove Theorem 3. To prove Theorem 4, we need the following lemma. Lemma 4.3

Let p

> m + ~, 0 < q < P - ~, where q is the constant in

Then there exist constants C 1 ,C2 ,C3 such that any solution u(x,t)
u

of (1.1) (1.2) satisfies

+ t)-P:"l + C ( lx 1 + t)-p:"m + C ( lx 1 + t)-2(/-q> , 2

2

3

where C 1 ,C2,C3 depend only on N ,m,p,q. Proof

Let Xo E R N \ { 0 }, 0

< to < T

and let 0 < R

0.7).

< IXo I.

2

(4.6)

440

Vol. 15

ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA

We consider in the set

G= {(x,t): Ix-xol
where r

= Ix

C(R 2 -

=

v(x,t)

r2

+ t)-p-m, 2

Xo I and C is a constant such that

-

=

Lv

~vm

vt -

CiJ;ax; (v)

-

+

> -

u"

0

. G tn.

(4.7)

In fact, noting that 2C- (R 2 -

vt = -

p-m

~Vm = 8m(m

r

+ t )__p-m

2

2_ _ 1

4C- (R 2 'VI. = -

p-m

c

+ P)C"(R 2 _

+ t) __2_p-m

+ t)-p:!mr 2 + p4mN cm(R 2 - m

r2

(p - m)2

r2

r2

1(

XOi )

x; -

+ t)-;~~

we have > -

Lv

-2C - (R 2 -

p - m

+ t) __2_p-m

p-m

4M m cq

-

p-m 2

-

r

_ 8(m

(p -

2

(R 2

r2

-

+

8m(m P)cm(R2 - r 2 (p - m)2

2C

2

--(R -

p-m

r

4mN cm(R2 _ r 2

P- m

m)2

4M mcq(R 2 - r 2

-

-

+ t) m-p-2q p-m-r + C P(R 2 -

-!:.L { + t)-p-m CP -

+ p) Cmr2 _

1

+ t)_-1L p-mr2

+ t)-~

4mN cm(R 2 _ r 2

-

_(R >

r2

p-m

2

r2

-2p + t)p-m

+ t') p+m-2 p-m

+ t')

q + t )p+m-2 p-m r }

where the hypothesis (1. 7) is used. To satisfy (4. 7), it is sufficient to take p+m-2q + to)p-m + C 2 + t o)(---p=-m+2:)p-q ,C2 ,C depend only on N, P .q, Since v = + on CG and u Cx, 0) = 0
C where C 1

= C1 (R 2 + to) (p-m)(p-l> p+m-2

+C

2(R

1

2

1

1

3(R

00

3

it follows from the comparison principle (see [15J) that u(xo,t o)

for every 0 < R


1(R

Z

+ to)-P-l + C 2(R + to)-p-m + C

+ t o)-2(P-q)

(4.8)

(0, T). Hence (4. 6) follows by letting R

= IXo I.

1

1

Z

< IXo I and every to E

Proof of Theorem 4 By Lemma 4.3, if p > m

3(R

+ ~, q <

f B u(x,t)dx < C(R) R

where C(R) does not depend on t. Thus limf u(x,t)dx 1-0

BR

<

C(R)

and this implies that (1. 1) (1. 2) has no very singular solution.

2

1

p - ~ we have

No.4

Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION

441

References 1

Peletier L A. The porous media equation, Application of Nonlinear Analysis in the Physical Sciences. Pitman, 1981.229-241.

2

W u Zhouqun. Degenerate quasilinear parabolic equation. China: Advance in Mathematics, 1987 , 16 (2) : 121-158.

3

Kamin S. Source-type solutions for equations of nonstationary filtrations. J. Math. Analysis Applic , 1978,63.

4

Zeldovich Ya B, Raizer Yu P. Physics of shock waves and high - temperature hydrodynamic phenomena, Vol.

n. NowYork-London: Academic Press, 1969.

5

Brezis H, Friedmen A. Nonlinear parabolic equations involving measures as initial conditions. J.

6

Kamin S, Peletier L A. Source - type solutions of degenerate diffusion equations with absorption.

7

Brezis H, Peletier LA, Terman D. A very singular solution of the heat equation with absorption.

8

Peletier LA, Terman D. A very singular solution of the porous media equation with absorption. J.

9

Zhao Junning. Source-type solutions of degenerate quasiliear parabolic equations. J. Differential E-

Math. Pures Appl. ,1983,62: 73-79. Israel Journal of Math. , 1985,50(3) Arch. Rational Anal. ,1986,95: 185-207 Diff.Equ. ,1986,65:396-410. quations, 92(2) :179-198 10

Aguirre J, Escobedo M. Source solutions for a convection diffusion problem: global existence and blow-up. preprint.

11

Liu Wenxiong. Singular solutions for a convection diffusion equation with absorption. IMA, preprint Series 653, Univ. of Minnesota.

12

DiBenedetto E. Continuity of weak solutions to a general porous media equation. Indiana Univ. Math.J. ,1983,32:83-118

13

Ladyzenskaja 0 A, Solonnikov V A, U ralceva N N. Linear and quasiliear equations of parabolic type. Trans. of Math. Mono. Providence, 1968.

14

Giaquinta M. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems. Princeton Univ. Press, 1983.

15

Zhao Iunning, Uniqueness of generalized solution for the first boundary value problem of degenerate parabolic equation. Acta Mathematica Scientia . 1986,6(1):63-70.