1995,15(4) :431-441
vd'atheThiacta!7cientia
l~tmJl~fIl SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION EQUATION WITH ABSORPTION· Zhao Junning(~1~~) Dept. of Math. , Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China.
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the existence and nonexistence of singular solutions for a
porous medium equations with convection and absorption terms.
Key words
1
Convection diffusion equation, singular solution, existence and nonexistence.
Introduction Consider the Cauchy problem u,
=
L1u
u(x,O)
where m
>
l,p
m
+ -ad-b;(u) a";
= 0
> 0, and b.Cs)
x
E C
1
-
u"
in ST = R N X (O,T),
(1.1)
E RN\{O},
(1.2)
(R ) .
Equation (1. 1) arises from many applications. We will not recall them here, since they can be found in many papers, for example in [IJ [2J. The case when the initial datum is a measure is also a model for physical phenomena (see [3 J [4 J). For the case b.Cu')
= 0, it was shown in [5J and [6J respectively, that if m > 1,0 < p < m
+ ~, the
problem (1. 1) (1. 2) has a solution which satisfies the initial condition u(x,0)=8(x),
where 8(x) denotes the Dirac mess. concentrated at the origin and that if p
(1.3)
>
m
+~,
the problem (1.1) (1.3) has no solution. In addition, it was shown in [7J and [8J that for b.Cu') = 0, max {l ,m}
< p < m < ~ O. 1) -
O. 2) has a very singular solution, i,
e. a solution w with the following properties w
E C(Sr\{ (O,O)})
w(x,O)
=
0
if
x
(1.4)
E RN\{O}
• Received Apr. 13,1992. Supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China.
(1.5)
432
ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA
lim t-O+
I
w(x,t)dx
Ixl
=
+
00,
for every r
Vol. 15
> o.
(1.6)
=
t1cp(u) - u" some similar results have
For the general porous medium equation u,
been obtained in [9J by using a method different to that in [7J[8J. In this paper, we are interested in the effect of the convection term aCht on the exis~t
tence and nonexistence of singular solutions to Cauchy problem (1. 1) - (1. 2). For the case m'
=
l,b;(u)
=
uq ,
J. Aguirre, M. Escobeto[lO] and W. Liu[lO] proved that if 1 < p <
1
+ ~ and 1 < q < 1 + ~, O. 1) , O. 3) has a unique solution and that if p > 1 + ~ and
1
< q<
p
t
1, O. 1) O. 2) has no singular soluton and that if 1 < p
~ p ~ 1 , then
(1. 1)
O.
< 1 + ~, 1 < q
2) has a very singular solution. Here we use the method simi-
lar to that in [9J to improve and generalize the results in [10-IIJ. We assume that Ib~(s)
I<
Msq-l
if s
> o.
(1.7)
We shall prove the following theorems. Suppose that (1.7) holds and let 0 < p
Theorem 1
< m + N2
0
+ N2 .
Then (1. 1) (1. 3) has a solution. Theorem 2
Suppose that (1.7) holds and let p ~ m
+
2 N' 0
mN+ 1 nN + 2 P ·
Then (1. 1) (1. 3) has no solution. Theorem 3
Suppose that (1.7) holds and let m
2 N' 0 < q
< p.
Then
(1.1) (1.2) has a very singular solution. Suppose that (1.7) holds and let p
Theorem 4
2 > m + N' 0< q < p -
1
N. Then
(1.1) (1.2) has no very singular solution. Clearly, for the case m
= 1,
b, = u" , Theorem 1- Theorem 4 weakened the condi-
tions of index q in [10J [11J.
2
Proof of Theorem 1 Definition 2. 1
A solution u of (1. 1), (1. 3) is a nonnegative function defined in Sr
such that 1.
2.
u
E
It
T
3.
lim t-O+
Ll(Sr)
(1/.u
I
n LtXJ(R
+ /iTJum -
N
X (r,T))
n C(Sr\{(O,O)}), for every
t:
E
bi(u)1/Zi - TJuP)dxdt = 0, for every 1/ E Q(8T )
u(x,t)¢(x)dx
=
¢(O), for every ¢
RN
E
c: (R
N
(O,T), ,
) .
We first discuss the solutions of equation (1.1) with initial date
u(x,O)
= kNh(kx)
(2.1)
No.4
Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION
where h(x) E' C';' (R N )
,
h(x)
>
I
0,
RN
= 1,
h(x)dx
433
> o.
k
Such solutions are defined as in Definition 2. 1. Without loss of generalities, in the following context, we use C to denote the constants independent of k , although they may change from line to line in the same proof. In this section we suppose that the hypotheses of Theorm 1 are satisfied. Denote BR(xo)
Lemma 2.1
=
{x E R N
I<
R}.
The problem (1.1) (2.1) have a nonnegative solution u, E LOCJ(ST)
C(ST) which satisfies
I
RN
Proof
Ix - Xo
:
Uk(x,t)dx
+
II
S,
ufdxdt
<
n
1.
We consider the approximte problem of (1. 1) (2.1) u,
= Llum + ~b;(u) aXt
-
uP
+ (l)P
in B; X (O,T),
(2.3)
on Ixl = n,
u(x,t) = (l)N+l n
(2.2)
(2.4) It is well known that (2. 2) - (2. 4) has a unique classical solution U,tn and (l)N+1 n
<
< B(k),
Ukn
where B(k) is a constant independent of n, By [12J, for every compact set K CST' the {Ukn} is ~quicontinuous on K . Thus we can select a subsequence from {u,tn} , which denotes again by {u,tn} , such that for any compact set K C ST U,tn -. u,
as n -.
(X)
in C(K).
It is easy to verify that u, is a solution of (1. 1) (2. 1). Set o., Vkn
+ 1J)2
----1
(vin
Notice that
=
Ukn -
(l )N+l, n
so that o.;
=
Ix I
0 on
n, We multiply (2. 2) by
. . over B n X (0 , T) . an d Integrate It
rJ =rJ
a':: bi(Ui.)
JOB.; JOB.
~~Jv"b~(s
CAL; 0
(vin
Vi.
+ 1J) 2: 1
dxdt
+ (l)N+l) n
(S2
s
1dsdxdt
+ 1J) 2
=o.
Using an analogous argument with Lemma 2. 1 in [9J, we can prove Lemma 2. 1. u,
>
Without loss of generalities, in the following lemmas, we assume u, E C 2 (ST) and 0. Otherwise we consider the approximate problem
434
ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA
Lemma 2. 2
The solution UJ. of (1.1) (2.1) satisfies
[J o
where 0
< a<
Proof
Vol. 15
min {~, m
Let ~(x)
E
BR(x
(uJ.)m+~-adxdt <
+~-
q} and C(a) is a constant independent of
C~(B2R(XO))'
< ~<
0
1, ~ = 1 if
+ U~)-1~2 and integrate over ST to obtain
(1.1) by u~(1
sa 2 -1 adx~ dx RN o · S
JJ = - [J
+
UIt ( X . T }
o
R
N
(2.6)
C(a)
O)
+ (m
4ma
a )2
-
x
Xo
and k •
E BR(xo). We multiply
[J 0
ui a m-a 2 2 2 RN (1 + UJ.a)21 \1UJ. I ~ dxdt
-2u: +1 a\I UJ.m • \I ~~dxdt - 2JTJ N u, 0 R
J"'. b (s) 1 +sa I
i
0
-;ds~~x.dxdt
S
I
Using Schwarz's inequality, we get m-a ~ dxdt [JR +uiau~)21 \1ui21
o
N
2
(1
o
R
1
N
0
R
N
~ I \I ~ Iuidxdt,
where the hypotheses (1. 7) is used. Let UJ.l = max{uJ.,l}.
Then by Sobolev's imbedding inequality (see [13
[J o
R
N
2 ~2U!1+N-adxdt~
J
O
p74J)
2JTJ Uk1dx}N. 0
B ZR
R
N
m-a 1\I(~uiT)12dxdt.
Notice that
[LN¢frurl+-k-adxdt
{I + [LN¢fr-2Ui'I+adxdt + [LN¢2 r-l u:dxdt}
{[JRN¢2rU';1+N-adxdt ,-~
This implies
2
0
2
(2.7)
Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION
No.4
435
and Lemma 2. 2 is proved. Lemma 2. 3
The solution (1.1) (2. 1) satisfies
(2.8)
where C·
(p
=
Proof
11)
p':) •
Since C* t" p2.} is a solution of (1. 1) by comparison principle we can obtain
(2.8).
For every ball B R (x o ) C R N \ {O} and 0 <
Lemma 2. 4
r
< 1 + ~ the solution u, of
(1. 1) (2. 1) satisfies
(2. 9) and
(2.10)
Proof
Let~(x)EC~(RN), O<~
tiply (1.1) by ~2U~(Y Y
>
0) and integrate over ST to obtain
+1 1f RNC;eau;r+l (
R
N
X
,t
)d
+ (m4mY + y)2 ftf RNC;e21 \l u,r+m 12d
x
0
u!+r-lUkx.~x.dxds •
2ftf 0
•
R
N
2
f"i rrb~(r)dr~~x.dxds 0
,
d
s
I
+ - l - f N ~2(kNh(kx))r+ldx Y+ 1 R • Since supp ~ C R N \ {O}, h E C~ (R N )
X
(2.11)
we have
~2kNh(kx)
=
0
if k is large enough. Hence, we obtain from (2.11) that supf ~2ur+l(x,t)dx+[fN ~21\lu:~mI2dxds O
Using the imbedding inequality, we have [of R N
~sur+m+2k+~dxdt 2
N~2ur+ldx + [ f 0
RN
I \l (~u:tr)
12dxdt}1+~ (2. 12)
for some s
>
O.
436
ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA
For t: E (
~,
Vol. 15
1) , set
R = R( r + 1 2 1
1')
1
1
and let ~l be a cutoff function in B R1(xo) with ~l 2 Denote 1 N by K and choose r such that
=
=
0,1,2,···,
1 on B R1+1 •
+
r= r = N
= 2q
where d
mN
+q - 2 -
+K
d - q m - 1
+K
if q
1
if q
>m,
< m,
1.
We first dicuss the case q
> m,
From (2. 12), we get
I [ojf 1+1ut+KI+1dxdt< { (1 - C 2R2([f.J B
1
r)
R
Ud+K1dXdt+[f ur;-q+d+K1dxdt) }K. oj B R1 1
BR
Without loss of generality, we can assume
[J o
B
ut+K'dxdt
>
for any 1 > 1.
1
R1
and then we have
([L
R
1
K'
+1
1
ut+ + dxdt ) R'dxdt I
1
<
1 2[ f oj
C
(R(l -
Hence the Standard Moser's iteration yields
BrRSX~f.T)U! <
{(O - ;)R)N+2[L
r))
r
ut+ K1d xdt, BR
I
1
Rdxdt
for
t:
1
E (2' 1).
(2. 13)
From (2. 13), we get
Applying Schwarz's inequality, we get 1 sup Ul< 2
B-rRX (O.T)
1
sup u l+C(r){(O_l)R)N+2[f ut+rdxdt}r.
BRX (O.T)
r
0
J
BR
Hence by [14 p161 Lemma 3. IJ, we get
and Lemma 2. 4 when q
>m
is proved.
The proof of (2.9) is similar to the proof of (2. 10). Proof of Theorem 1
By Lemma 2. 2- Lemma 2. 4, q <
m
+ ~ and using an argu-
ment similar to the proof of Theorem 1 in [9J, we can prove Theorem 1.
No.4
3
Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION
437
Proof of Theorem 2 The proof of Theorem 2 proceeds via two lemmas. Let p>m+
Lemma 3.1
~, o
t ~p,
whereqis the constant in 0.7).
Then any solution of (1. 1) (1. 3) satisfies
[J
u/ d xdt
{u~t
+ um~~ - b;(u)~x. - uP~}dxdt =
o BR
<
>
for any R
00,
0
(3.1)
and
[J o
R
N
0,
(3.2)
•
for any ~ E C~ (R N X (- T, T». Proof
The proof of (3.1) is similar to the proof of Lemma 3.2 in [9J, we omit it.
We now prove (3.2). Let
'b(
+
Ixl 2
where ~(x,t) E C;;" (R N X (- T ,T», Y = m -1 1](s)
= 1 if s > 2,
1](s)
Since for every k
= 0 if S < 1 and
>
1]k(S)
=
t~) ~(x,t)
+ ~ and TJ E C= (R) has the properties: 1](ks).
0,
follows from Definition 2.1 that
[LN(U¢'it
satisfies
u
+ UmLi¢'i -
b,(U)¢'h; - uP¢'i)dxdt = O.
Therefore, it is sufficient to verify that as k --.
00
[J «: ~1]k~dxdt --. 0, [J um~1]k - \J~dxdt--.O, [J b;(U)1]kx.~dxdt--.O. [J o
o
R
R
N
u1]kt~dxdt --. 0,
0
N
R
N
0
R
N
•
Set Then
[JRNUTJit~dxdt I
I
D
A:
I[LNumLiTJi~dxdtl < CkJL.umdxdt, I[JRNum\lTJi
0
\l~dxdtl < C
I[LNb,(U)TJiz,Uxdtl
<
C
./kHD.umdxdt,
./kJL
uidxdt;
i
Noting that
IDkl =
measure of D,
(mN+2)
= Ck--2-,
(3.3)
438
ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA
Vol. 15
we obtain by means of Holder's inequality
C{JL.uPdxdt}.
k~JL.udxdt =
kJL.Umdxdt = C( JL.UPdxdt)~ . .fkJL.u
9dxdt
< C(JL.uPdxdt) '.
Since
(3. 3) is proved. Similarly to the proof of Lemma 3. 2 in [9J, we can prove the following lemma. Lemma 3. 2
Suppose that
[J o
BR
u
satisfies
uPdxdt
<
for every R
00
> 0,
and
[ ojr
R
N
(uet
+ um~e -
for any
~
E
b.(u)ex .
C~ (R
Then limr N u(x,t)X(x)dx
t-oJ
R
-
upe)dxdt
•
=
N
=
° (3.4)
X (- T ,T) ) .
° for any X E C~(RN).
By Lemma 3.1- Lemma 3.2 and using an argument similar to that in the proof of' Theorem 2 in [9], we can prove Theorem 2.
4 Proof of Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 We discuss the solution of equation (1.1) with initial data u(x,O)
where h Ca:') E
=
(4. 1)
k N + 1h(kx) ,
C;;'(R h(x) > 0, LNh(X)dx = 1. N
) ,
It is well-known that (1.1) (4.1) has a nonnegative solution u, E LrxJ(O,T;L 1(R N )
)
n C(5
T )
and \lu'; E L 2(B R X
os.r».
Similarly to proof of Lemma 2. 3, we can prove (4.2) Moreover, we have the following estimates. Lemma 4.1 isfies
Let BR(x O ) CRN\{O}. Then the solution of problem (1.1) (4.1) sat-
Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION
No.4
439
(4.3) Let ~ E CC; (R N )
Proof
choose 1J
=
U:~2 (a
a
0 < ~ < 1, ~ (z)
,
> m) in Definition 2. 1 to
r
=
1 if x E B R(xo) , supp ~ C R N \ { 0 }. We
obtain
l l ui+l(x,T)e2dx+ rr uf+ae J JR + JR
=-
+
2dxdt+
N
rr J J ~u:V'~.
2
_1_
a
+
r
IJR N
JrrJR.
N
e2\l ui . \lui
0
rr J J Jr"ib;(s)sads~~x.dxdt
V'u';dxdt - 2
RN
0
N
0
0
R
N
0
r
(k N+ 1 h ( k x ) )a+l~2dx.
(4.4)
Notice that
and kN+1h(kx)
= 0 on supp
~
if k is large enough. From (4. 4) we obtain
rr
J0 JR Since p
N
~2ur+adxdt <
> max {q ,m },
Lemma 4.2
where 0 < r
crr I V'~12u!+adxdt + C + crr I V'~lu1+adxdt. J JR J JR 0
N
N
0
(4.5)
(4. 3) follows from (4. 5), as in the proof of Lemma 2. 2.
Let BR(xo) C RN\{O}. Then the solution u, of (1.1) (4.1) satisfies
< 1+
2 N.
The proof of Lemma 4. 2 is similar to that of Lemma 2. 4. By Lemma 4. 1, Lemma 4. 2, (4. 2) and using an argument similar to that in the proof of Theorem 3 of [9J, we can prove Theorem 3. To prove Theorem 4, we need the following lemma. Lemma 4.3
Let p
> m + ~, 0 < q < P - ~, where q is the constant in
Then there exist constants C 1 ,C2 ,C3 such that any solution u(x,t)
u
of (1.1) (1.2) satisfies
+ t)-P:"l + C ( lx 1 + t)-p:"m + C ( lx 1 + t)-2(/-q> , 2
2
3
where C 1 ,C2,C3 depend only on N ,m,p,q. Proof
Let Xo E R N \ { 0 }, 0
< to < T
and let 0 < R
0.7).
< IXo I.
2
(4.6)
440
Vol. 15
ACTA MATHEMATICA SCIENTIA
We consider in the set
G= {(x,t): Ix-xol
where r
= Ix
C(R 2 -
=
v(x,t)
r2
+ t)-p-m, 2
Xo I and C is a constant such that
-
=
Lv
~vm
vt -
CiJ;ax; (v)
-
+
> -
u"
0
. G tn.
(4.7)
In fact, noting that 2C- (R 2 -
vt = -
p-m
~Vm = 8m(m
r
+ t )__p-m
2
2_ _ 1
4C- (R 2 'VI. = -
p-m
c
+ P)C"(R 2 _
+ t) __2_p-m
+ t)-p:!mr 2 + p4mN cm(R 2 - m
r2
(p - m)2
r2
r2
1(
XOi )
x; -
+ t)-;~~
we have > -
Lv
-2C - (R 2 -
p - m
+ t) __2_p-m
p-m
4M m cq
-
p-m 2
-
r
_ 8(m
(p -
2
(R 2
r2
-
+
8m(m P)cm(R2 - r 2 (p - m)2
2C
2
--(R -
p-m
r
4mN cm(R2 _ r 2
P- m
m)2
4M mcq(R 2 - r 2
-
-
+ t) m-p-2q p-m-r + C P(R 2 -
-!:.L { + t)-p-m CP -
+ p) Cmr2 _
1
+ t)_-1L p-mr2
+ t)-~
4mN cm(R 2 _ r 2
-
_(R >
r2
p-m
2
r2
-2p + t)p-m
+ t') p+m-2 p-m
+ t')
q + t )p+m-2 p-m r }
where the hypothesis (1. 7) is used. To satisfy (4. 7), it is sufficient to take p+m-2q + to)p-m + C 2 + t o)(---p=-m+2:)p-q ,C2 ,C depend only on N, P .q, Since v = + on CG and u Cx, 0) = 0
C where C 1
= C1 (R 2 + to) (p-m)(p-l> p+m-2
+C
2(R
1
2
1
1
3(R
00
3
it follows from the comparison principle (see [15J) that u(xo,t o)
for every 0 < R
1(R
Z
+ to)-P-l + C 2(R + to)-p-m + C
+ t o)-2(P-q)
(4.8)
(0, T). Hence (4. 6) follows by letting R
= IXo I.
1
1
Z
< IXo I and every to E
Proof of Theorem 4 By Lemma 4.3, if p > m
3(R
+ ~, q <
f B u(x,t)dx < C(R) R
where C(R) does not depend on t. Thus limf u(x,t)dx 1-0
BR
<
C(R)
and this implies that (1. 1) (1. 2) has no very singular solution.
2
1
p - ~ we have
No.4
Zhao: SINGULAR SOLUTIONS FOR A CONVECTION DIFFUSION
441
References 1
Peletier L A. The porous media equation, Application of Nonlinear Analysis in the Physical Sciences. Pitman, 1981.229-241.
2
W u Zhouqun. Degenerate quasilinear parabolic equation. China: Advance in Mathematics, 1987 , 16 (2) : 121-158.
3
Kamin S. Source-type solutions for equations of nonstationary filtrations. J. Math. Analysis Applic , 1978,63.
4
Zeldovich Ya B, Raizer Yu P. Physics of shock waves and high - temperature hydrodynamic phenomena, Vol.
n. NowYork-London: Academic Press, 1969.
5
Brezis H, Friedmen A. Nonlinear parabolic equations involving measures as initial conditions. J.
6
Kamin S, Peletier L A. Source - type solutions of degenerate diffusion equations with absorption.
7
Brezis H, Peletier LA, Terman D. A very singular solution of the heat equation with absorption.
8
Peletier LA, Terman D. A very singular solution of the porous media equation with absorption. J.
9
Zhao Junning. Source-type solutions of degenerate quasiliear parabolic equations. J. Differential E-
Math. Pures Appl. ,1983,62: 73-79. Israel Journal of Math. , 1985,50(3) Arch. Rational Anal. ,1986,95: 185-207 Diff.Equ. ,1986,65:396-410. quations, 92(2) :179-198 10
Aguirre J, Escobedo M. Source solutions for a convection diffusion problem: global existence and blow-up. preprint.
11
Liu Wenxiong. Singular solutions for a convection diffusion equation with absorption. IMA, preprint Series 653, Univ. of Minnesota.
12
DiBenedetto E. Continuity of weak solutions to a general porous media equation. Indiana Univ. Math.J. ,1983,32:83-118
13
Ladyzenskaja 0 A, Solonnikov V A, U ralceva N N. Linear and quasiliear equations of parabolic type. Trans. of Math. Mono. Providence, 1968.
14
Giaquinta M. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems. Princeton Univ. Press, 1983.
15
Zhao Iunning, Uniqueness of generalized solution for the first boundary value problem of degenerate parabolic equation. Acta Mathematica Scientia . 1986,6(1):63-70.