Journal Pre-proof SIRT1/PGC-1 pathway activation triggers autophagy/mitophagy and attenuates oxidative damage in intestinal epithelial cells Danyang Liang, Yisha Zhuo, Zeheng Guo, Lihua He, Xueyi Wang, Yulong He, Lexing Li, Hanchuan Dai PII:
S0300-9084(19)30359-1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.12.001
Reference:
BIOCHI 5802
To appear in:
Biochimie
Received Date: 22 May 2019 Accepted Date: 6 December 2019
Please cite this article as: D. Liang, Y. Zhuo, Z. Guo, L. He, X. Wang, Y. He, L. Li, H. Dai, SIRT1/PGC-1 pathway activation triggers autophagy/mitophagy and attenuates oxidative damage in intestinal epithelial cells, Biochimie, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.12.001. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. and Société Française de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire (SFBBM). All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT Oxidative stress leads to intestinal epithelial cells damage, which induces tight junction injury and systemic endogenous stress syndrome. The evidence suggests that SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway is closely associated with oxidative damage. However, the mechanism in protecting intestinal epithelial cells against oxidative stress dependant on autopahgy/mitophagy remains to be elucidated. In the current study, we investigated the functional role of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway on regulation of autopahgy/mitophagy and tight junction expression underlying the oxidative dysfunction in porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-1). Results demonstrated that H2O2 exposure caused high accumulation of ROS, with a decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential and an inhibition of the tight junction molecules in IPEC-1 cells. Also, COX IV mRNA expression and SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway were suppressed. Autophagy and PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy were activated following H2O2 treatment. Further research indicated that activation of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway caused by specific activator SRT 1720 resulted in elevating autophagy/mitophagy related markers and SIRT1 inhibitor EX 527 reversed these effects. Additionally, SIRT1 activation significantly suppressed the ROS generation, leading to increase mitochondrial membrane potential and COX IV expression. Most importantly, the expression of tight junction molecules contributing
to
maintain
intestinal
barrier
integrity
was
significantly
up-regulated. Collectively, these findings indicated that autophagy/mitophagy
elevation caused by SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation might be a protective mechanism
to
increase
tight
junction
integrity
stress-mediated ROS production in IPEC-1 cells.
against
oxidative
1
SIRT1/PGC-1
pathway
activation
triggers
autophagy/mitophagy
2
attenuates oxidative damage in intestinal epithelial cells
and
3 4
Danyang Liang, Yisha Zhuo, Zeheng Guo, Lihua He, Xueyi Wang, Yulong He,
5
Lexing Li, Hanchuan Dai
6
Danyang Liang: ORCID, 0000-0003-1649-3666
7
Yisha Zhuo: ORCID, 0000-0001-6610-5727
8
Zeheng Guo: ORCID, 0000-0002-8233-5714
9
Lihua He: ORCID, Email, 0000-0001-6629-2075
10
Xueyi Wang: ORCID, 0000-0001-7273-5792
11
Yulong He: ORCID, 0000-0002-2043-3896
12
Lexing Li: ORCID, 0000-0001-7939-7407 Hanchuan Dai: ORCID, 0000-0001-6753-9703
13 14
College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan,
15
Hubei 430070, China
16 17
Corresponding Author:
18
Hanchuan Dai
19
College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University,
20
No.1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
21
Tel. +8602787280408, E-mail.
[email protected] 1
22
ABSTRACT
23
Oxidative stress leads to intestinal epithelial cells damage, which induces tight
24
junction injury and systemic endogenous stress syndrome. The evidence
25
suggests that SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway is closely associated with oxidative
26
damage. However, the mechanism in protecting intestinal epithelial cells
27
against oxidative stress dependant on autopahgy/mitophagy remains to be
28
elucidated. In the current study, we investigated the functional role of
29
SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway on regulation of autopahgy/mitophagy and tight
30
junction expression underlying the oxidative dysfunction in porcine intestinal
31
epithelial cells (IPEC-1). Results demonstrated that H2O2 exposure caused
32
high accumulation of ROS, with a decrease of mitochondrial membrane
33
potential and an inhibition of the tight junction molecules in IPEC-1 cells. Also,
34
COX IV mRNA expression and SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway were suppressed.
35
Autophagy and PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy were activated following
36
H2O2 treatment. Further research indicated that activation of SIRT1/PGC-1α
37
pathway caused by specific activator SRT 1720 resulted in elevating
38
autophagy/mitophagy related markers and SIRT1 inhibitor EX 527 reversed
39
these effects. Additionally, SIRT1 activation significantly suppressed the ROS
40
generation, leading to increase mitochondrial membrane potential and COX
41
IV expression. Most importantly, the expression of tight junction molecules
42
contributing to maintain intestinal barrier integrity was significantly up-
2
43
regulated. Collectively, these findings indicated that autophagy/mitophagy
44
elevation caused by SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation might be a protective
45
mechanism to increase tight junction integrity against oxidative stress-
46
mediated ROS production in IPEC-1 cells.
47 48
KEYWORDS: SIRT1/PGC-1α; Oxidative damage; Intestinal epithelial cells;
49
Autophagy; Mitophagy
50 51
Abbreviations: IPEC, Porcine intestinal epithelial cells; ROS, Reactive
52
oxygen species; SIRT1, Silent information regulator 1; PGC-1α, Proliferator-
53
activated receptor γ coactivator 1α; LC3, Microtubule associated protein 1
54
light chain 3; ATG5, Autophagy-related proteins 5; qPCR, Quantity
55
Polymerase Chain Reactiton; DCFH-DA, 2',7'- Dichlorodi hydro fluorescein
56
diacetate; NAD+, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; ZO-1, Zonula occludens-
57
1; FBS, Fetal bovine serum; HRP, Horseradish Peroxidase; DEPC, Diethyl
58
Pyrocarbonate; PVDF, Polyvinylidene fluoride.
59 60 61 62 63
3
64
1. Introduction
65
Intestinal epithelial cells are essential to the maintenance of the symbiotic
66
relationship between gut microbiota and the host by constructing mucosal
67
barriers, secreting various immunological mediators and delivering bacterial
68
antigens [1, 2]. The intestinal mucosal epithelial barrier is the histological
69
basis for selective permeability of the intestinal mucosa, which prevents
70
conflict between gut microbiota and host immune cells that would result in
71
intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress [3]. The intestine has been
72
characterized as the motor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [4]
73
and is a key source of ROS. Various intestinal diseases and dysfunction have
74
been attributed to the excess production of ROS [5]. Oxidative stress caused
75
by ROS contributes to impairment of intestinal barrier integrity, eventually
76
leading to the pathogenesis of systemic bowel-origin stress syndrome [6, 7].
77
Recently, targeting cellular stress signaling and ROS have been proposed as
78
new therapies for intestinal diseases [7].
79
Oxidative stress is regarded as a defense mechanism and strongly related
80
with autophagy [8, 9]. As an evolutionarily material degradation and turnover
81
process, autophagy may decrease cellular oxidative stress by clearance of
82
reactive species generating organelles, damaged proteins, or alternatively
83
decrease specific antioxidants to maintain cellular homeostasis in response
84
to different stresses [10, 11]. Cellular oxidative and accumulation of ROS are
4
85
mediators of mitochondrial damage. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative
86
damage may contribute to pathogenesis of a variety of diseases [12].
87
Evidences suggested that PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is one of the
88
main pathways to eliminate the excessive mitochondria or damaged
89
mitochondria, which leads to mitochondrial quality control and may be
90
detrimental to cell survival [13]. PINK1 can recruit Parkin to the impaired
91
mitochondria as well as resulting in the recruitment of p62/SQSTM1 and
92
ubiquitinated mitochondria or other autophagy related proteins and induce
93
mitophagy.
94
autophagosomes and then degraded by autolysosomes to maintain the
95
homeostasis of mitochondria [14, 15].
Subsequently,
mito-aggresomes
are
phagocytosed
by
96
SIRT1 (silent information regulator of transcription 1) is a highly conserved
97
member of the family of NAD+-dependent Sir2 histone deacetylases, which
98
deacetylates downstream PGC-1α and consequently increases its activity [16].
99
SIRT1/PGC-1α has been reported to involve in the regulation of various
100
pathological processes related to oxidative stress, anti-aging, cell survival,
101
intestinal homeostasis [17-19]. SIRT1 can be activated by SRT 1720 and
102
resveratrol. The half-life of SRT 1720 is longer than that of resveratrol and its
103
affinity with SIRT1 is approximately 1000 times as strong as that with
104
resveratrol [20]. SIRT1 also has been demonstrated to improve mitochondrial
105
oxidative metabolism [21] and positively regulate autophagy and mitochondria
5
106
function under oxidative stress [22, 23]. Overexpression of SIRT1 stimulates
107
the formation of autophagosomes and elevates the basal levels of autophagy,
108
while SIRT1 deficiency arrests autophagy in response to nutrient deprivation
109
[13, 22, 24].
110
To explore the mechanism of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation against
111
cell damage, we performed a series of biochemical assays in IPEC-1 cells.
112
Our results elucidated a pathway whereby SIRT1 might function to decrease
113
oxidative stress injury and maintain intestinal epithelium integrity via
114
autophagy/mitophagy activation.
115 116
2 Materials and methods
117
2.1. Cell culture and treantment
118
IPEC-1 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (1:1) (Cat. no: SH30023.01B,
119
Hyclone, USA) medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (1027-106,
120
Gibco, USA), 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (15140122, Gibco, USA), 1‰ Insulin,
121
Transferrin, Selenium, Ethanolamine Solution (ITS-X) (51500056, Gibco,
122
USA), 5 µg/L EGF recombinant human protein (PHG0313, Gibco, USA), and
123
maintained in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
124
Loughborough, UK). Cells were seeded in 6- or 96-well plates (Corning, USA)
125
at 1 × 104 or 5×105 cells/well, respectively, and then stimulated with 300 µM
126
H2O2 [25] at a confluence of 70-80%.
6
127
To evaluate the functional role of SIRT1 on oxidative, autophagy and
128
mitophagy, the optimal working concentrations of specific activator SRT 1720
129
(925434-55-5, MCE, USA) and inhibitor EX 527 (49843-98-3, MCE, USA)
130
were screened. Cells were first treated with activator and inhibitor for 12 h,
131
and co-incubated with H2O2 for 12 h under the same conditions cited above.
132 133
2.2. ROS generation measurement
134
ROS concentration in IPEC-1 cells was measured by loading with the
135
fluorescent probe 2ʹ, 7ʹ-dichlorofluorescindiacetate (DCFH-DA) (Jiancheng,
136
Nanjing, China). Briefly, IPEC-1 cells were cultured in 96 well plate at a
137
concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well for 18 h. Supernatants were removed and
138
incubated with HBSS containing 10 µmol/L of the DCFH-DA and incubated at
139
37 °C for 30 min in dark. The cells were treated with 300 µmol/L H2O2 for 1 h.
140
ROS generation was detected by measuring fluorescence at 500/525 (Ex/Em)
141
wave lengths using fluorescence microplate (PE, USA).
142 143 144
2.3. Mitochondrial membrane potential detection 5,5′,6,6′-Tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1)
145
probe was employed to measure mitochondrial depolarization in IPEC-1 cells
146
with mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit (C2006, Beyotime, China).
147
IPEC-1 cells were stained with JC-1 for 15 min at 37 °C according to the
7
148
instruction of manufacturer. The JC-1 monomer and JC-1 polymer in the
149
mitochondria were detected by fluorescence microplate (PE, USA). The green
150
and red fluorescence values were collected after treating with JC-1 staining
151
working solution, and the change of mitochondrial membrane potential was
152
detected by the conversion ratio of fluorescence color.
153 154
2.4. RNA extraction and Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis
155
Total RNAs from cells were extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen,
156
Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the reverse transcription reaction was carried out
157
using first strand cDNA synthesis kit (FSK-101, Toyobo, Japan). qPCR was
158
performed using a standard protocol from the SYBR Green Realtime PCR
159
Master kit (QPK-201, Toyobo, Japan) on the LightCycler® 96 detection
160
system (Roche, Switzerland). Comparative quantification was calculated
161
utilizing the 2–∆∆Ct (cycle threshold) method and normalized to GAPDH levels.
162
All samples were performed in triplicate. The primers (Qingke, China) used
163
are listed in the Table 1.
164 165 166 167 168
8
Table1 Primers sequences of qPCR
169 Gene name
Forward primer
Reverse primer
GAPDH
GGTGAAGGTCGGAGTGAA
COX IV
TGG GCAGCAGTGGCAGAATGT
CCCGAAGGCACACCGAAGTAGA
SIRT1
ATTCTTGTGAAAGTGATGAGGATG
ATTGTTCGAGGATCTGTGCC
PGC-1α
GTGTCGCCTTCTTGTTCTTCTTTT
CGCATCCTTTGGGGTCTTT
PINK1
CTCTGGTCGACTACCCCGAT
ATGACGAGGAAGAGTGTCCG
Parkin
CCAAACCGGATGAGTGGTGA
CTTGTCAGAGGTCGGGTGTG
LC3 B
CCGAACCTTCGAACAGAGAG
AGGCTTGGTTAGCATTGAGC
Beclin1
AGGAGCTGCCGTTGTACTGT
CACTGCCTCCTGTGTCTTCA
p62
AGTGTCCGTGTTTCACCTTCC
TGCCCAGACTACGACTTGTG
ATG5
CCCTCTTGGGGTACATGTCT
CGTCCAAACCACACATCTCG
ZO-1
CGGCGAAGGTAATTCAGTGT
TCTTCTCGGTTTGGTGGTCT
Claudin-1
AGATTTACTCCTACGCTGGTGAC
GCAAAGTGGTGTTCAGATTCAG
Occludin
ATGCTTTCTCAGCCAGCGTA
AAGGTTCCATAGCCTCGGTC
CAGAAGGGGCAGAGATGA
170 171
2.5. Protein extraction and western blotting
172
The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (cat. no. PP1202, Aidelai, China) for 30
173
min on ice. Protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid
174
method (cat. no. PP0101, Aidelai, China). The proteins were separated by 8%
175
or 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis containing 0.1% SDS and
176
transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated for 2 h at
177
room temperature in blocking buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 137 mM NaCl, pH 8.0,
178
containing 0.1% Tween and 5% non-fat dry milk) and probed with antibodies 9
179
against LC3 (cat. no. 12741; 1:1000 dilution; CST, USA), Beclin1 (cat. no.
180
3495; 1:1000 dilution; CST, USA), p62 (cat. no. 5114S; 1:1000 dilution; CST,
181
USA), ATG5(cat. no. 12994S; 1:1000 dilution; CST, USA), PINK1 (cat. no.
182
6946S; 1:1000 dilution; CST, USA), Parkin (cat. no. 14060-1-AP; 1:1000
183
dilution; Proteintech, USA), SIRT1 (cat. no. 9475S; 1:1000 dilution; CST,
184
USA), PGC-1α (cat. no. ab106814; 1:1000 dilution; Abcam, USA), Claudin-1
185
(cat. no. D3H7C; 1:1000 dilution; CST, USA), GAPDH (cat. no. GB13002;
186
1:3000 dilution; Servicebio, China) at 4 °C overnight. After being washed 3
187
times with TBST, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-
188
IgG (cat. no. GB23303; 1:3000 dilution; Servicebio, China) at room
189
temperature for 2 h. GAPDH was used as an internal control. The reacted
190
proteins were visualized using an electrochemiluminescence (ECL) system
191
(Biotanon, China) and protein ratios were calculated following Image J
192
densitometric analysis.
193 194
2.6. Statistical analysis
195
Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent
196
experiments for each cellular experimental group. We evaluated the data by
197
two-tailed student's t-test with Graphpad Prism version 5.0 (Graphpad
198
software, USA). P value of less than 0.05 (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)
199
was considered as statistically significant difference.
10
200
3. Results
201
3.1. H2O2 exposure induces oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells
202
In order to explore the effect of oxidative stress in IPEC-1 cell, cells were
203
treated with 300 µM H2O2 for 12 h. Firstly, ROS levels, mitochondrial
204
membrane potential and COX IV mRNA expression were investigated by
205
using DCFH-DA fluorescent probe, JC-1 fluorescent probe and qPCR. Results
206
showed that ROS levels in IPEC-1 cells were increased after stimulation with
207
H2O2 (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, the mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 1B)
208
and COX IV mRNA expression (Fig. 1C) were significantly suppressed
209
following treatment with H2O2,, which indicated that the oxidative stress might
210
contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction in IPEC-1 cells. Additionally, tight
211
junction molecules including Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1 mRNA expression and
212
Claudin-1 protein levels were exerted. The data showed that the mRNA
213
expression levels of Occludin (Fig. 1D), ZO-1 (Fig. 1E) and Claudin-1 (Fig. 1F)
214
were significantly down-regulated. Also, Claudin-1 Protein expression was
215
inhibited (Fig. 1G-H). These findings suggested that oxidative stress resulted
216
in intestinal epithelial cells oxidative damage and triggered intestinal mucosal
217
barrier dysfunction.
11
218 219 12
220
Fig. 1. H2O2 exposure induced oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells. QPCR and
221
western blotting were performed for detecting COX IV and tight junction
222
molecules including Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1 mRNA expression and
223
Claudin-1 protein. A. ROS levels were detected by DCFH-DA fluorescent
224
probe; B. The membrane potential was investigated by JC-1 fluorescent probe;
225
C. COX IV mRNA expression; D. Occludin mRNA expression; E. ZO-1 mRNA
226
expression; F. Claudin-1 mRNA expression; G and H. Claudin-1 protein
227
expression. Data were shown as mean ± SEM of three independent
228
experiments. Significant difference from control (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
229 230
3.2. Oxidative stress triggers autophagy/mitophagy in IPEC-1 cells
231
Autophagy/mitophagy promotes cell survival under various stressors. To
232
further confirm the oxidative stress-induced autophagy/mitophagy in IPEC-1
233
cells, we measured the expression of autophagy/mitophagy associated
234
markers. The results demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression of
235
LC3 and Beclin1 were elevated following H2O2 treatment (Fig. 2A-C).
236
The p62 protein, also called sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), is one of the
237
selective substrates for autophagy, which can bind directly to LC3 and
238
GABARAP family proteins via a specific sequence motif. The results
239
demonstrated that p62/SQSTM1 is negatively correlated with autophagy
240
activity (Fig. 2A-C). It was suggested that PINK1/Parkin mediated mitophagy
13
241
appears to be the best understanding pathway in regulating mitochondria
242
homeostasis in oxidative stress. Thus, we tried to explore the expression of
243
PINK1 and Parkin. The data showed that the mRNA and protein expressions
244
of PINK1 and Parkin were significantly increased (Fig. 2D-F). These findings
245
indicated that oxidative stress might induce IPEC-1 cells autophagy and lead
246
to activate mitophagy process through PINk1/Parkin pathway.
247 248
Fig. 2. Oxidative stress activated autophagy/mitophagy program in IPEC-1
249
cells.
QPCR
and
western
blotting
14
were
performed
for
detecting
250
autophagy/mitophagy related markers including LC3, Beclin1, p62, PINK1 and
251
Parkin. A. LC3, Beclin1 and p62 mRNA expression; B and C. LC3, Beclin1
252
and p62 protein expression; D. PINK1 and Parkin mRNA expression; E and F.
253
PINK1 and Parkin protein expression. Data were shown as mean ± SEM of
254
three independent experiments. Significant difference from control (*P < 0.05,
255
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
256 257
3.3. SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway is activated by SIRT1 activator SRT 1720
258
SIRT1, known as NAD+-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1, deacetylates
259
proteins which contribute to cellular regulation of stressors and regulates the
260
activity of the PGC-1α. We investigated the expression of SIRT1/ PGC-
261
1αunder oxidative stress condition in IPEC-1 cells. The results showed that
262
the mRNA (Fig. 3A) and protein (Fig. 3C-D) expression of SIRT1 were down-
263
regulated in IPEC-1 cells after H2O2 treatment. Meanwhile, the levels of PGC-
264
1αmRNA (Fig. 3B) and protein (Fig. 3C-D) were also significantly decreased.
265
These data indicated that oxidative stress could inhibit SIRT1/PGC-1α
266
pathway in IPEC-1 cells. To further confirm the specific role of SIRT1 on
267
autophagy/mitophagy in IPEC-1 cell, cells were treated with SIRT1 activator
268
SRT 1720 (0 µM、1.25 µM、2.5 µM and 5 µM) and inhibitor EX 527 (0 µM、1
269
µM、5 µM、10 µM and 20 µM) to screen the optimal working concentration
270
on the expression of SIRT1 and PGC-1α. QPCR results preliminary illustrated
15
271
that the mRNA expression of SIRT1 (Fig. 4A-B) and PGC-1α (Fig. 4C-D) was
272
significantly increased or inhibited respectively along with the different
273
concentration of the activator and inhibitor. At a concentration of 1.25 µM SRT
274
1720 and 1 µM EX 527, the activation and inhibition were the most
275
pronounced. Next, western blotting was carried out to further verify the effects.
276
We found that 1.25 µM SRT 1720 has significant activation on the SIRT1 and
277
PGC-1α protein expression, and 1 µM EX 527 showed the strong inhibition
278
ability under oxidative stress conditions (Fig. 4E-H). These results indicated
279
that inhibition of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway caused by oxidative stress could be
280
elevated by SRT 1720 and reversed by EX 527.
281 282
Fig. 3. Oxidative stress inhibited SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway pathway in IPEC-1
16
283
cells. QPCR and Western blotting were performed for detecting the
284
expression of SIRT1 and its downstream PGC-1α. A. SIRT1 mRNA
285
expression; B. PGC-1α mRNA expression; C and D. SIRT1 and PGC-1α
286
protein expression. Data were shown as mean ± SEM of three independent
287
experiments. Significant difference from control (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
17
288 289
Fig. 4. SIRT1/PGC-1α expression in IPEC-1 cells treated with activator SRT
290
1720 and inhibitor EX 527. QPCR and Western blotting were performed for 18
291
detecting the expression of SIRT1/PGC-1α mRNA and protein. A and B.
292
SIRT1 mRNA expression; C and D. PGC-1α mRNA expression; E and F.
293
SIRT1 protein expression treated with 1.25 µM activator SRT 1720 and 1 µM
294
EX 527; G and H. PGC-1α protein expression treated with 1.25 µM activator
295
SRT 1720 and 1 µM EX 527. Data were shown as mean ± SEM of three
296
independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). NS: no
297
significant difference was observed.
298 299
3.4. Activation of SIRT1 enhances autophagy/mitophagy
300
To explore the role of SIRT1 on the regulation of autophagy/mitophagy in
301
IPEC-1 cells, we treated cells with the 1.25 µM activator SRT 1720 and 1 µM
302
inhibitor EX 527 respectively for 12 h and then co-incubated with H2O2 for
303
another 12 h. The mRNA and protein levels of LC3 and ATG5 were detected
304
by qPCR and Western Blotting. The data demonstrated that activation of
305
SIRT1 could significantly up-regulate mRNA and protein expression levels of
306
autophagy related markers LC3, but the activation was abolished by inhibitor
307
EX 527 (Fig. 5A-C). Notably, as a key protein involved in the extension of the
308
phagophoric membrane in autophagic vesicles, ATG5 contributed to gut
309
microenvironment [26]. The expression was also increased (Fig. 5D-F).
310
Afterwards, the effect of SIRT1 on the PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy
311
was checked. Activation of SIRT1 also promoted PINK1 and Parkin mRNA
19
312
and protein expression (Fig. 6). It was concluded that activation of SIRT1
313
might enhance oxidative stress-induced autophagy and result in elevation of
314
PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy.
315 316
Fig. 5. Evaluation of autophagy related gene after treatment with 1.25 µM
317
SRT 1720 and 1 µM EX 527. QPCR and western blotting were performed for
20
318
detecting autophagy related markers including LC3 and ATG5. A. LC3 mRNA
319
expression; B and C. LC3 protein expression; D. ATG5 mRNA expression; E
320
and F. ATG5 protein expression. Data were shown as mean ± SEM. of three
321
independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). NS: no
322
significant difference was observed.
323
324 21
325
Fig. 6. Evaluation of PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy after treatment with
326
1.25 µM SRT 1720 and 1 µM EX 527. QPCR and western blotting were
327
performed for detecting mitophagy related markers including PINK1 and
328
Parkin. A. PINK1 mRNA expression; B and C. PINK1 protein expression; D.
329
Parkin mRNA expression; E and F. Parkin protein expression. Data were
330
shown as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P <
331
0.01, ***P < 0.001). NS: no significant difference was observed.
332 333 334
3.5. Activation of SIRT1 ameliorates oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells The previous results showed that SIRT1 is abnormally expressed in
335
oxidative
damage
IPEC-1
cells.
Activation
336
autophagy/mitophagy. To investigate whether SIRT1 could ameliorate
337
oxidative damage, IPEC-1 cells were treated with activator SRT 1720 and
338
inhibitor EX 527 for 12 h and coincubated with H2O2 for another 12 h. ROS,
339
mitochondrial membrane potential and COX IV mRNA expression were
340
detected with DCFH-DA fluorescence probe, JC-1 fluorescence probe and
341
qPCR. Results showed that, compared with the H2O2 group, the ROS level
342
was significantly decreased (Fig. 7A). The membrane potential level (Fig. 7B)
343
and COX IV mRNA expression were increased (Fig. 7C) following H2O2
344
treatment, while SIRT1 inhibitor treatment showed the opposite effect. Also,
345
intestinal mucosal tight junction molecule Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1 mRNA
22
of
SIRT1
can
enhance
346
and Claudin-1 protein were checked by qPCR or Western blotting. The results
347
indicated that ZO-1 (Fig. 7D), Occludin (Fig. 7E), and Claudin-1 (Fig. 7F)
348
mRNA levels were increased following SRT 1720 treatment on the basis of
349
H2O2 stimulation. Further research indicated that Claudin-1 protein expression
350
was increased, and the inhibitor blocked the effect. These data suggested that
351
activation of SIRT1 could repair the damage of the intestinal barrier integrity,
352
and contribute to a significant antioxidant effect in IPEC-1 cells.
23
353 354
Fig. 7. Activation of SIRT1 could ameliorate oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells. 24
355
QPCR and western blotting were performed for detecting COX IV and tight
356
junction molecules including Occludin, ZO-1, Claudin-1 mRNA expression and
357
Claudin-1 protein; A. ROS level was investigated by DCFH-DA fluorescent
358
probe; B. The membrane potential was detected by JC-1 fluorescent probe; C.
359
COX IV mRNA expression; D. ZO-1 mRNA; E. Occludin mRNA expression; F.
360
Claudin-1 mRNA expression; G and H. Claudin-1 protein expression. Data
361
were shown as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **
362
P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). NS: no significant difference was observed.
363 364
4. Discussion
365
Intestinal epithelial cells play a critical role in the maintenance of gut
366
homeostasis, and involve in multiple biological processes, including digestion
367
and absorption, secretion, immunity, signal recognition [2]. Effective
368
management of intestinal remains a significant challenge to health system.
369
Oxidative stress has been considered as a central mediator and one of the
370
main pathogenic mechanisms of intestinal epithelial cells damage, which is
371
known to be characterized by excessive ROS production and results in cell
372
damage and subsequent complications [27, 28]. These responses are
373
associated with many pathogenic diseases such as microbial and viral
374
infections, exposure to allergens, radiation and toxic chemicals, autoimmune
375
and chronic diseases, damaging many components including proteins,
25
376
DNA/RNA and lipids [29, 30]. Our results indicated oxidative stress caused by
377
H2O2 leaded to ROS accumulation and inhibition of mitochondrial membrane
378
potential. Also, COX IV and tight junction molecules mRNA or protein
379
expression were suppressed. These findings demonstrated that oxidative
380
stress resulted in intestinal epithelial cells oxidative damage and triggered
381
intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction, which suggested that maintaining the
382
balance between oxidants and antioxidants was important to avoid oxidative
383
stress for alteration intestinal epithelial cells integrity.
384
SIRT1, the best-studied Sirtuin protein family member, is a nuclear and
385
cytoplasmic sirtuin involved in the control of histones a transcription factors
386
function [31]. SIRT1 may contribute to cellular function regulation by
387
deacetylating PGC-1α and involves in energy management, mitochondrial
388
biogenesis and various physiological processes including aging and stress
389
response [20, 32]. SIRT1 and PGC-1α are transcriptional coactivator of many
390
genes and play an important protective role against oxidative stress-related
391
diseases [32, 33]. As an NAD+-dependent deacetylase, SIRT1 can be
392
activated by a small molecule activator SRT 1270 and exerts multiple
393
pharmacological activities with beneficial health effects. It can repair DNA
394
damage, maintain the stability of the genome, regulate mitosis and control
395
oxidative stress [34]. In the present study, a performance of SIRT1/PGC-1α
396
pathway was noted following H2O2 treatment in IPEC-1 cells. The data
26
397
showed that the expression of SIRT1 and PGC-1α protein was decreased
398
under oxidative stress. SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation could be caused by
399
agonists SRT 1720, leading to a significant decrease of ROS and an elevation
400
of mitochondrial membrane potential and COX IV expression. However, this
401
activation could be reversed by SIRT1 antagonist, EX 527. These findings
402
suggested oxidative stress resulted in SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway malfunction,
403
and SIRT1/PGC-1α activity elevation caused by SRT 1720 might contribute to
404
antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress inhibition.
405
Accumulating evidences demonstrated that SIRT1 involved in oxidative
406
damage and might promote autophagosome formation through deacetylation
407
of key autophagy related molecules in the form of NAD+-dependence [35, 36].
408
Autophagy is usually considered as a protective process that prepares the cell
409
to survive under various stress conditions [37, 38]. Mitophagy dependant
410
PINK1/Parkin
411
eliminating damaged mitochondria, which is regarded as a defense
412
mechanism of mitochondrial function [39]. Autophagy/motophagy activation
413
contributes to remove the damaged or redundant organelles metabolites and
414
maintain the cell homeostasis [40]. In the present study, oxidative stress
415
significantly activated autophagy markers including LC3 and Beclin 1, and
416
p62 expression level was inhibited. Also, PINK1 and Parkin expression were
417
elevated after treatment with H2O2. The further results indicated autophagy
pathway is
thought
to
27
maintain
mitochondrial quality by
418
markers and PINK1/Parkin pathway were significantly increased compared
419
with H2O2 group. As suggested, LC3 and Beclin1 were autophagy markers
420
to monitor the autophagy flux, and p62 was an autophagic substrates to verify
421
the lysosome degradation [38]. PINK1/Parkin dependant-mitophagy is one of
422
the main pathways contributing to maintain the homeostasis and quality
423
control of mitochondria [41]. The data indicated that activation of SIRT1 could
424
further result in autophagy/motophagy activation based on the oxidative stress
425
in IPEC-1 cells.
426
Intestinal epithelial cells participate in digestion and absorption, secretion,
427
immunity, signal recognition and has been regarded as the center of stress
428
response. Dysfunctional Intestinal epithelial cells are often accompanied by
429
systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and even organ
430
dysfunction [42]. Oxidative stress can easily induce intestinal mucosal
431
epithelial structure damage, intestinal flora disorder, increasing intestinal
432
permeability and cause the multiple diseases [43, 44]. Tight junctions
433
represented by Occludin, ZO-1 and Claudin-1 are considered as a
434
cornerstone of barrier integrity and barrier function [45]. We found that the
435
expression of Claudin-1, ZO-1, Occludin mRNA expression and the Claudin-1
436
protein level were suppressed following oxidative stress. SIRT1/PGC-1α
437
pathway activation caused by SRT 1720 resulted in expression elevation of
438
tight junction proteins. SIRT1 inhibitor EX 527 could reverse the effect. These
28
439
findings allowed us to infer that the imbalance of cellular redox system
440
promotes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and contributes to
441
barrier dysfunction. SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation could effectively
442
protect the intestinal mucosal barrier from free oxygen radical damage.
443
In conclusion, H2O2 exposure induces IPEC-1 cells oxidative damage and
444
mitochondrial
dysfunction,
which
resulted
445
1αpathway activity and led to autophagy/motophagy activation. SIRT1/PGC-
446
1α pathway activation contributed to autophagy/mitophagy elevation and
447
ameliorated oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells (Fig. 8). These results indicated
448
that autophagy/mitophagy elevation caused by SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway
449
activation would be a protective mechanism to increase tight junction integrity
450
against oxidative stress -mediated ROS production in IPEC-1 cells and
451
suggested that SIRT1/autophagy/mitophagy/oxidative stress might be an
452
effective potential target and research design idea for intestinal stress injury.
29
in
decreased
SIRT1/PGC-
453 454
Fig. 8 Schematic illustration of SIRT1/PGC-1α on oxidative atress, autophagy
455
and mitopahgy. Oxidative stress induces IPEC-1 cells integrity damage and
456
resulted
457
autophagy/motophagy elevation. SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway activation might
458
ameliorate oxidative damage in IPEC-1 cells through autophagy/mitophagy
459
process.
in
decreased
SIRT1/PGC-1α
pathway
460 461 462
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing financial interests.
463 464
Author contributions 30
activation,
and
465
Danyang Liang and Hanchuan Dai conceived and designed the study.
466
Danyang Liang, Yisha Zhuo, Zeheng Guo, Lexing Li performed the
467
experiments. Danyang Liang, Lihua He, Xueyi Wang, Yulong He and
468
Hanchuan Dai analyzed the experimental data. Danyang Liang and Hanchuan
469
Dai wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
470 471
Acknowledgments
472
This work was sponsored by National key Research and Development
473
Program (Grant no. 2016YFD0501210), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei
474
(Grant no. 2018CFB444), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central
475
Universities of China (Grant no. 2011QC004).
476 477
References
478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495
[1] M.D. Hu, L. Jia, K.L. Edelblum, Policing the intestinal epithelial barrier: Innate immune functions of intraepithelial lymphocytes, Current pathobiology reports 6 (2018) 35-46. [2] R. Okumura, K. Takeda, Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis, Experimental & molecular medicine 49 (2017) e338. [3] J.R. Araújo, J. Tomas, C. Brenner, P.J. Sansonetti, Impact of high-fat diet on the intestinal microbiota and small intestinal physiology before and after the onset of obesity, Biochimie 141 (2017) 97-106. [4] M. Meng, N.J. Klingensmith, C.M. Coopersmith, New insights into the gut as the driver of critical illness and organ failure, Current opinion in critical care 23 (2017) 143-148. [5] L. Zheng, H. Wei, H. Yu, Q. Xing, Y. Zou, Y. Zhou, J. Peng, Fish Skin Gelatin Hydrolysate Production by Ginger Powder Induces Glutathione Synthesis To Prevent Hydrogen Peroxide Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress via the Pept1-p62-Nrf2 Cascade, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 66 (2018) 11601-11611. [6] M. Iizuka, K. Sasaki, Y. Hirai, K. Shindo, S. Konno, H. Itou, S. Ohshima, Y. Horie, S. Watanabe, Morphogenic protein epimorphin protects intestinal epithelial cells from oxidative stress by the activation of EGF receptor and MEK/ERK, PI3 kinase/Akt signals, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology 292 (2007) G39-52. [7] S.S. Cao, Cellular Stress Responses and Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, 31
496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538
Gastroenterology research and practice 2018 (2018) 7192646. [8] S.M. O'Grady, Oxidative stress, autophagy and airway ion transport, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology 316 (2019) C16-c32. [9] Y.N. Qiu, G.H. Wang, F. Zhou, J.J. Hao, L. Tian, L.F. Guan, X.K. Geng, Y.C. Ding, H.W. Wu, K.Z. Zhang, PM2.5 induces liver fibrosis via triggering ROS-mediated mitophagy, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 167 (2018) 178-187. [10] S. Nakamura, T. Yoshimori, Autophagy and Longevity, Molecules & Cells 41 (2018) 65-72. [11] F. Song, L. Li, D. Liang, Y. Zhuo, X. Wang, H. Dai, Knockdown of long noncoding RNA urothelial carcinoma associated 1 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis via modulating autophagy, 234 (2019) 7420-7434. [12] C. Barrera, R. Valenzuela, M.A. Rincon, A. Espinosa, F. Echeverria, N. Romero, D. Gonzalez-Manan, L.A. Videla, Molecular mechanisms related to the hepatoprotective effects of antioxidant-rich extra virgin olive oil supplementation in rats subjected to short-term iron administration, Free radical biology & medicine 126 (2018) 313-321. [13] M. Lazarou, D.A. Sliter, L.A. Kane, S.A. Sarraf, C. Wang, J.L. Burman, D.P. Sideris, A.I. Fogel, R.J. Youle, The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy, Nature 524 (2015) 309-314. [14] C. Vives-Bauza, C. Zhou, Y. Huang, M. Cui, R.L. de Vries, J. Kim, J. May, M.A. Tocilescu, W. Liu, H.S. Ko, J. Magrane, D.J. Moore, V.L. Dawson, R. Grailhe, T.M. Dawson, C. Li, K. Tieu, S. Przedborski, PINK1dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (2010) 378-383. [15] Y. Yan, T. Finkel, Autophagy as a regulator of cardiovascular redox homeostasis, Free radical biology & medicine 109 (2017) 108-113. [16] S. Tang, Y. Fang, G. Huang, X. Xu, E. Padilla-Banks, W. Fan, Q. Xu, S.M. Sanderson, J.F. Foley, S. Dowdy, M.W. McBurney, D.C. Fargo, C.J. Williams, J.W. Locasale, Z. Guan, X. Li, Methionine metabolism is essential for SIRT1-regulated mouse embryonic stem cell maintenance and embryonic development, The EMBO journal 36 (2017) 3175-3193. [17] J. Li, L. Feng, Y. Xing, Y. Wang, L. Du, C. Xu, J. Cao, Q. Wang, S. Fan, Q. Liu, F. Fan, Radioprotective and antioxidant effect of resveratrol in hippocampus by activating Sirt1, International journal of molecular sciences 15 (2014) 5928-5939. [18] K. Hasegawa, S. Wakino, K. Yoshioka, S. Tatematsu, Y. Hara, H. Minakuchi, N. Washida, H. Tokuyama, K. Hayashi, H. Itoh, Sirt1 protects against oxidative stress-induced renal tubular cell apoptosis by the bidirectional regulation of catalase expression, Biochemical and biophysical research communications 372 (2008) 51-56. [19] W. Wei, L. Li, Y. Zhang, Geriletu, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, Y. Xing, Vitamin C protected human retinal pigmented epithelium from oxidant injury depending on regulating SIRT1, TheScientificWorldJournal 2014 (2014) 750634. [20] S.J. Mitchell, A. Martin-Montalvo, E.M. Mercken, H.H. Palacios, T.M. Ward, G. Abulwerdi, R.K. Minor, G.P. Vlasuk, J.L. Ellis, D.A. Sinclair, J. Dawson, D.B. Allison, Y. Zhang, K.G. Becker, M. Bernier, R. de Cabo, The SIRT1 activator SRT1720 extends lifespan and improves health of mice fed a standard diet, Cell reports 6 (2014) 836-843. [21] J.A. Funk, S. Odejinmi, R.G. Schnellmann, SRT1720 induces mitochondrial biogenesis and rescues mitochondrial function after oxidant injury in renal proximal tubule cells, The Journal of pharmacology 32
539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581
and experimental therapeutics 333 (2010) 593-601. [22] I.H. Lee, L. Cao, R. Mostoslavsky, D.B. Lombard, J. Liu, N.E. Bruns, M. Tsokos, F.W. Alt, T. Finkel, A role for the NAD-dependent deacetylase Sirt1 in the regulation of autophagy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2008) 3374-3379. [23] X. Ou, M.R. Lee, X. Huang, S. Messina-Graham, H.E. Broxmeyer, SIRT1 positively regulates autophagy and mitochondria function in embryonic stem cells under oxidative stress, Stem cells 32 (2014) 1183-1194. [24] X. Liu, S. Cai, C. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Luo, B. Xing, X. Du, Deacetylation of NAT10 by Sirt1 promotes the transition from rRNA biogenesis to autophagy upon energy stress, Nucleic acids research 46 (2018) 9601-9616. [25] Y. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, A. Fu, L. Gong, W. Li, Y. Li, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 alleviates the oxidative stress of IPEC-1 via modulating Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and decreasing ROS production, Applied microbiology and biotechnology 101 (2017) 3015-3026. [26] L. Yang, C. Liu, W. Zhao, C. He, J. Ding, R. Dai, K. Xu, L. Xiao, L. Luo, S. Liu, W. Li, H. Meng, Impaired Autophagy in Intestinal Epithelial Cells Alters Gut Microbiota and Host Immune Responses, Applied and environmental microbiology 84 (2018). [27] R. Okumura, K. Takeda, Maintenance of intestinal homeostasis by mucosal barriers, Inflammation and regeneration 38 (2018) 5. [28] L. Chen, J. Zhang, C. Li, Z. Wang, J. Li, D. Zhao, S. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Huang, X. Guo, Glycine Transporter-1 and glycine receptor mediate the antioxidant effect of glycine in diabetic rat islets and INS-1 cells, Free radical biology & medicine 123 (2018) 53-61. [29] G. Diaz de Barboza, S. Guizzardi, L. Moine, N. Tolosa de Talamoni, Oxidative stress, antioxidants and intestinal calcium absorption, World journal of gastroenterology 23 (2017) 2841-2853. [30] T. Hussain, B. Tan, Y. Yin, F. Blachier, M.C. Tossou, N. Rahu, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: What Polyphenols Can Do for Us?, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2016 (2016) 7432797. [31] I. Carnevale, L. Pellegrini, P. D'Aquila, S. Saladini, E. Lococo, L. Polletta, E. Vernucci, E. Foglio, S. Coppola, L. Sansone, G. Passarino, D. Bellizzi, M.A. Russo, M. Fini, M. Tafani, SIRT1-SIRT3 Axis Regulates Cellular Response to Oxidative Stress and Etoposide, Journal of cellular physiology 232 (2017) 1835-1844. [32] K. Kaarniranta, J. Kajdanek, J. Morawiec, E. Pawlowska, J. Blasiak, PGC-1alpha Protects RPE Cells of the Aging Retina against Oxidative Stress-Induced Degeneration through the Regulation of Senescence and Mitochondrial Quality Control. The Significance for AMD Pathogenesis, 19 (2018). [33] T. Zhang, Y. Chi, Y. Kang, H. Lu, H. Niu, W. Liu, Y. Li, Resveratrol ameliorates podocyte damage in diabetic mice via SIRT1/PGC-1alpha mediated attenuation of mitochondrial oxidative stress, Journal of cellular physiology 234 (2019) 5033-5043. [34] J.C. Milne, P.D. Lambert, S. Schenk, D.P. Carney, J.J. Smith, D.J. Gagne, L. Jin, O. Boss, R.B. Perni, C.B. Vu, J.E. Bemis, R. Xie, J.S. Disch, P.Y. Ng, J.J. Nunes, A.V. Lynch, H. Yang, H. Galonek, K. Israelian, W. Choy, A. Iffland, S. Lavu, O. Medvedik, D.A. Sinclair, J.M. Olefsky, M.R. Jirousek, P.J. Elliott, C.H. Westphal, Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, Nature 450 (2007) 712-716. [35] S.B. Song, S.Y. Jang, H.T. Kang, W. Bie, U. Jeoun, G.S. Yoon, Hwang, E. Seong, Modulation of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and ROS Generation by Nicotinamide in a Manner Independent of SIRT1 and Mitophagy, Molecules & Cells 40 (2017) 503-514. 33
582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613
[36] Y. Li, P. Wang, X. Yang, W. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. He, W. Zhang, T. Jing, B. Wang, R. Lin, SIRT1 inhibits inflammatory response partly through regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome in vascular endothelial cells, Mol Immunol 77 (2016) 148-156. [37] D. Peña-Oyarzun, R. Bravo-Sagua, A. Diaz-Vega, L. Aleman, M. Chiong, L. Garcia, C. Bambs, R. Troncoso, M. Cifuentes, E. Morselli, C. Ferreccio, A.F.G. Quest, A. Criollo, S. Lavandero, Autophagy and oxidative stress in non-communicable diseases: A matter of the inflammatory state?, Free Radical Biology and Medicine 124 (2018) 61-78. [38] L. Li, C. Huang, Y. He, Z. Sang, G. Liu, H. Dai, Knockdown of Long Non-Coding RNA GAS5 Increases miR-23a by Targeting ATG3 Involved in Autophagy and Cell Viability, Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology 48 (2018) 1723-1734. [39] Y. Kurihara, T. Kanki, Y. Aoki, Y. Hirota, T. Saigusa, T. Uchiumi, D. Kang, Mitophagy plays an essential role in reducing mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species and mutation of mitochondrial DNA by maintaining mitochondrial quantity and quality in yeast, The Journal of biological chemistry 287 (2012) 3265-3272. [40] F. Song, L. Li, D. Liang, Y. Zhuo, X. Wang, H. Dai, Knockdown of long noncoding RNA urothelial carcinoma associated 1 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis via modulating autophagy, (2018). [41] A. Rakovic, J. Ziegler, C.U. Martensson, J. Prasuhn, K. Shurkewitsch, P. Konig, H.L. Paulson, C. Klein, PINK1-dependent mitophagy is driven by the UPS and can occur independently of LC3 conversion, Cell death and differentiation (2018). [42] S. Randall-Demllo, M. Chieppa, R. Eri, Intestinal epithelium and autophagy: partners in gut homeostasis, Frontiers in immunology 4 (2013) 301. [43] S. Cao, H. Wu, C. Wang, Q. Zhang, L. Jiao, F. Lin, C.H. Hu, Diquat-induced oxidative stress increases intestinal permeability, impairs mitochondrial function, and triggers mitophagy in piglets, Journal of animal science 96 (2018) 1795-1805. [44] Y.Q. Xu, Y.Y. Xing, Z.Q. Wang, S.M. Yan, B.L. Shi, Pre-protective effects of dietary chitosan supplementation against oxidative stress induced by diquat in weaned piglets, Cell stress & chaperones 23 (2018) 703-710. [45] A.A. Almousa, F. Meurens, E.S. Krol, J. Alcorn, Linoorbitides and enterolactone mitigate inflammation-induced oxidative stress and loss of intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, International immunopharmacology 64 (2018) 42-51.
34
Highlights
1.
H2O2 exposure
triggered
intestinal
mucosal
barrier
dysfunction,
autophagy/motophagy activation and suppressed SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway.
2. Activation of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway enhanced autophagy and PINK1/Parkin -mediated mitophagy.
3. Activation of SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway contributed to ameliorate oxidative damage in intestinal epithelial cells.
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing financial interests.