Skin autofluorescence is associated with past glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Skin autofluorescence is associated with past glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354 Original article Skin autofluorescence is associated with past gl...

847KB Sizes 0 Downloads 67 Views

Available online at

www.sciencedirect.com Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

Original article

Skin autofluorescence is associated with past glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus M. Genevieve a,b , A. Vivot b , C. Gonzalez a,b , C. Raffaitin a,b , P. Barberger-Gateau b,c , H. Gin a,b , V. Rigalleau a,b,c,∗ a

Nutrition-Diabétologie, Bordeaux hospital, 33600 Pessac, France b Université Bordeaux Segalen, 33000 Bordeaux, France c Inserm, ISPED, Centre Inserm U897, Épidemiologie-Biostatistique, 33000 Bordeaux, France Received 21 September 2012; received in revised form 1st March 2013; accepted 12 March 2013

Abstract As skin autofluorescence (AF) can assess subcutaneous accumulation of fluorescent advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), this study aimed to investigate whether it was linked to glycaemic control and complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Using the AGE ReaderTM , AF was measured in T1DM patients referred to Haut-Levêque Hospital (Bordeaux, France); data on their HbA1c levels measured every 6 months as far back as the last 5 years were also collected. The association of AF with the patients’ past glucose control, based on their latest HbA1c values, and the means of the last five and 10 HbA1c values, and with diabetic complications was also examined by linear regression analysis. The sample included 300 patients: 58% were male; the mean age was 49 (SD 17) years and the mean diabetes duration was 21 (SD 13) years. The median skin AF measurement was 2.0 [25th–75th percentiles: 1.7–2.4] arbitrary units (AU), and this was associated with age (␤ = 0.15 per 10 years, P < 0.001) and diabetes duration (␤ = 0.17 per 10 years, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the skin AF measurement was also related to the means of the last five and 10 HbA1c values (␤ = 0.10 per 1% of HbA1c , P = 0.005, and ␤ = 0.13 per 1% of HbA1c , P = 0.001, respectively). In addition, the skin AF was associated with retinopathy (P < 0.001), albuminuria (P < 0.001) and decreased eGFR (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the skin AF is related to the long-term glucose control and diabetic complications. © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Type 1 diabetes; Skin autofluorescence; Advanced glycation end-products; HbA1c ; Microvascular complications

Résumé L’autofluorescence cutanée est associée au suivi glycémique et aux complications diabétiques chez les patients ayant un diabète de type 1. L’autofluorescence cutanée pouvant évaluer l’accumulation des produits fluorescents de glycation avancée, l’objectif de notre étude était d’analyser son association avec le contrôle glycémique et les complications des patients présentant un diabète de type 1. En utilisant l’AGE ReaderTM , nous avons mesuré l’autofluorescence cutanée chez les patients ayant un diabète de type 1 suivi tous les six mois sur cinq ans à l’hôpital Haut-Levêque (Bordeaux, France). Nous avons étudié sa relation avec le contrôle glycémique: la dernière HbA1c , la moyenne des cinq et dix dernières HbA1c , et avec l’existence de complications, par régression linéaire. Les 300 patients (58 % d’hommes) avaient une moyenne d’âge de 49 ± 17 ans et une durée de diabète moyenne de 21 ± 13 ans. L’autofluorescence cutanée médiane était de 2,0 [1,7–2,4] unités arbitraires (UA), associée à l’âge et à la durée de diabète (␤ = 0,15 pour 10 ans, P < 0,001 et ␤ = 0,17 pour dix ans, P < 0,001). Après ajustements pour l’âge et le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe), elle était liée à la moyenne des cinq dernières HbA1c (␤ = 0,10 pour 1 % d’HbA1c , P = 0,005) et des dix dernières HbA1c (␤ = 0,13 pour 1 % d’HbA1c , P = 0,001). L’autofluorescence cutanée était associée avec la présence d’une rétinopathie diabétique (P < 0,001), d’une micro- ou macroalbuminurie (P < 0,001) et d’une réduction du DFGe (P < 0,001). L’autofluorescence cutanée est liée au contrôle glycémique à long terme et aux complications (néphropathie et rétinopathie) chez les patients présentant un diabète de type 1. © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Mots clés : Diabète Type 1 ; Autofluorescence cutanée ; Produits de glycation avancée ; HbA1c ; Complications microvasculaires Abbreviations: AGEs, Advanced glycation end-products; T1DM, Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus; HbA1c , Glycated haemoglobin; BMI, Body mass index; eGFR, Estimated glomerular filtration rate; AU, Arbitrary units. ∗ Corresponding author. Nutrition–Diabétologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France. Tel.: +33 5 57 65 60 78; fax: +33 5 57 65 60 79. E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Rigalleau). 1262-3636/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2013.03.003

350

M. Genevieve et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

1. Introduction

2.3. Clinical data

Chronic hyperglycaemia is critical for the development of micro-angiopathic complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) via the increased production of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) [1,2]. Their levels in skin biopsies were predictive of later retinopathy and nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) cohort [3]. In clinical practice, AGEs can only be indirectly assessed by the regular assay of HbA1c levels and systematic screening for diabetes complications. However, the fluorescent properties of AGEs can help to improve their evaluation by measuring skin autofluorescence with an AGE ReaderTM [4]. Studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have indicated that skin autofluorescence is associated with diabetes complications [5] and predictive of cardiovascular events [6]. In T1DM, skin autofluorescence was higher in cases of retinopathy, although this relationship did not persist after adjusting for nephropathy [7]. Because nephropathy can be a consequence as well as a cause of AGE accumulation [8], the weak association with retinopathy questions the specificity of skin autofluorescence as a surrogate marker of the risk of diabetic complications. For this reason, the primary objective of the present study was to examine the association between skin autofluorescence on the forearm and glycaemic control over the past 5 years in adult patients with T1DM. A secondary objective was to investigate the association between skin autofluorescence and diabetic complications (retinopathy and nephropathy).

Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits (smoker vs never-smoker), duration of diabetes (years) and complications were recorded at the time of skin autofluorescence measurement. Retrospectively, the latest HbA1c value (n = 300; blood sampled 10 days before skin autofluorescence measurement) as well as the last five (n = 243) and 10 (n = 200) HbA1c values were noted in the patients who had the corresponding follow-ups. As specialized visits are scheduled every 6 months at our centre, these measurements reflected the patients’ glucose control over the previous 3 months, 2.5 years and 5 years, respectively, prior to the skin autofluorescence measurement. Using an independent ophthalmological examination, including retinal photography, fundoscopy and angiography when necessary, retinopathy was scored as either absent, background (micro-aneurysms, microhaemorrhages, hard exudates) or severe (pre-proliferative or proliferative). Micro-albuminuria was defined as an albumin excretion rate between 30 and 300 mg/24 h, and macro-albuminuria at a rate > 300 mg/24 h. Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [10] and defined as a value < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 .

2. Patients and methods 2.1. Subjects All consecutive patients with T1DM (n = 303) referred to the Nutrition-Diabetology unit of the University Hospital HautLevêque (Bordeaux, France) during 2009 were interviewed and examined. Of these patients, 300 gave their informed consent to participate in the study. 2.2. Skin autofluorescence measurement The accumulation of AGEs was estimated from skin autofluorescence as measured by the AGE Reader (DiagnOptics Technologies B.V., Groningen, Netherlands) and expressed in arbitrary units (AU) [9]. Autofluorescence was calculated by automated observer-independent analysis by dividing the average light intensity of the emission spectrum (300–600 nm) by the average light intensity of the excitation spectrum (300–420 nm). Reproducibility was indicated by a mean coefficient of variation of around 5%. The measurements were performed at a skin site on the forearm that was free of scars, lichenification and other abnormalities. In some subjects, the measurements on the contralateral forearm (n = 22), calf (n = 51) and forehead (n = 26) were also taken for comparisons. Subjects with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes V and VI could not be evaluated due to their skin pigmentation with ultraviolet (UV) reflectance < 10%.

2.4. Statistical analysis The results were expressed as percentages, medians and interquartile ranges or as means and standard deviations (SD) where appropriate. The comparisons of skin autofluorescence between sites (forearm vs contralateral forearm, calf and forehead), between men and women, and between smokers and never-smokers were performed by non-parametric tests. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated to analyze the relationship between skin autofluorescence values in forearm 1 and forearm 2, in forearm 1 and calf, and in forearm 1 and forehead. Separate univariable linear regression analyses were used to test the associations between skin autofluorescence (continuous variable) and complications: in the first model, retinopathy (three classes) was an independent variable, followed by reduced eGFR (three classes) and finally increased albuminuria (two classes). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between retinopathy (dependent variable dichotomized as absent vs background or severe) and skin autofluorescence measurements (continuous) adjusted for age (continuous) and eGFR (three classes). Also, the comparisons of skin autofluorescence between classes of complications were performed by non-parametric tests. In addition, the associations between forearm skin autofluorescence (dependent variable) and independent variables (glucose control at various times) were tested by univariable models, while multivariable linear models were adjusted for age (continuous) and eGFR (three classes). Separates analyses were carried out respectively in patients with a single HbA1c measurement (cross-sectional analysis, n = 300), with five past HbA1c measurements (n = 243) and with 10 past HbA1c measurements

M. Genevieve et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

351

Table 1 Characteristics of type 1 diabetes patients recruited at the Haut-Levêque Hospital (Bordeaux, France) according to HbA1c values. Latest HbA1c values (n = 300) Men (n, %) Age (years) HbA1c (%) Body mass index (kg/m2 ) Diabetes duration (years) Smoker (n; when information available, % of n) Albumin excretion rate (mg/24 h) Serum creatinine (␮mol/L) Retinopathy (n; when information available, % of n) No Background Severe

Last five HbA1c values (n = 243)

Last 10 HbA1c values (n = 200)

174 49.2 7.7 24.7

[58%] [17.4] [1.5] [4.2]

143 50.9 7.8 24.9

[58%] [16.5] [0.9] [4.2]

120 52.8 7.8 25.3

[60%] [15.3] [0.9] [4.3]

21.7

[13.7]

23.8

[12.5]

25.5

[12.1]

286

[25]

231

[24]

191

[24]

90

[287]

97

[305]

76

[239]

87

[57]

91

[61]

88

[51]

236

285

136 95 54

[48%] [33%] [19%]

98 87 51

196

[42%] [37%] [21%]

73 77 46

[37%] [39%] [24%]

Categorical variables are expressed as n [percentage], and continuous variables are expressed as means [SD].

(n = 200). A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. All the analyses were conducted using R statistics version 2.14.2 [11]. 3. Results 3.1. Study population characteristics A total of 300 T1DM patients were included in the study. Table 1 presents the main clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patients. 3.2. Skin autofluorescence in the forearm, calf and forehead There were no differences in skin autofluorescence between forearms or between forearm and calf (Table 2). However, skin autofluorescence was lower on the forehead than on the forearm (P < 0.001). Also, forearm values correlated with those from the other sites (r = 0.93 with other forearm, P < 0.001; r = 0.75 with the calf, P < 0.001; and r = 0.59 with the forehead, P < 0.01). In addition, skin autofluorescence was slightly higher in women than in men (P = 0.05), but did not differ between smokers and never-smokers (P = 0.7). 3.3. Skin autofluorescence and diabetes complications Skin autofluorescence on the forearm was higher in 50 patients who had micro-albuminuria or macro-albuminuria compared with those without albuminuria (Fig. 1a; Table 2). Furthermore, skin autofluorescence was associated with albumin excretion rate (␤ = 0.008 per 1 mg/day of albuminuria, P < 0.001), plasma creatinine level (␤ = 0.004 per 1 ␮mol/L of serum creatinine, P < 0.001) and with eGFR, as measured by CKD-EPI (␤ = –0.01 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m2 of GFR,

P < 0.001). Skin autofluorescence values increased with the decrease of eGFR (Fig. 1b). Retinopathy was present in 149 patients (52%), and skin autofluorescence was higher in the 95 patients who had background retinopathy vs no retinopathy and in the 54 with pre-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy (Fig. 1c). The presence of retinopathy was significantly associated with skin autofluorescence [odds ratio (OR): 2.45 for 1 AU, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–4.32; P < 0.01] independent of age and eGFR. Interestingly, skin autofluorescence was also greater when retinopathy was present in

Table 2 Skin autofluorescence (in arbitrary units, AU) in type 1 diabetes patients recruited at the Haut-Leveque Hospital (Bordeaux, France). Skin autofluorescence

P value

Forearm, n = 300

2.0

[1.7–2.4]

Contralateral forearm, n = 22

2.0

[1.8–2.3]

NS

Albumin excretion rate < 30 mg/24 h, n = 231 ≥ 30 mg/24 h, n = 50

2.0 2.4

[1.7–2.4] [1.9–2.8]

< 0.001

Estimated GFR (CKD-EPI) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 242 59–30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 28 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 8

2.0 2.6 2.9

[1.7–2.4] [2.3–2.9] [2.7–3.7]

< 0.001 < 0.001

Men, n = 174

2.0

[1.7–2.4]

= 0.05

Women, n = 126

2.1

[1.8–2.6]

Retinopathy: No, n = 136 Background, n = 95 Severe, n = 54

1.9 2.1 2.4

[1.7–2.2] [1.8–2.6] [2.3–2.7]

< 0.01 < 0.001

Data are presented as medians [25th–75th percentiles]; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration.

352

M. Genevieve et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

Fig. 1. Skin autofluorescence and diabetic complications. Significant relationships were found with: (a) albumin excretion rate at < 30 mg/day (1) and at ≥ 30 mg/day (2); (b) decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (1), at 59–30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (2) and at < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3); and (c) diabetic retinopathy (no retinopathy, 0; background retinopathy, 1; and severe retinopathy, 2).

patients with normal eGFR: no retinopathy (n = 119), autofluorescence = 1.9 AU, 95% CI: 1.7–2.2; background retinopathy (n = 78), autofluorescence = 2.1 AU, 95% CI: 1.8–2.5; and severe retinopathy (n = 34), autofluorescence = 2.3 AU, 95% CI: 1.9–2.5 (P < 0.001).

Table 3 Relationship between skin autofluorescence and HbA1c values measured at different times in type 1 diabetes patients recruited at Haut-Leveque Hospital (Bordeaux, France). HbA1c assessment

n

3.4. Skin autofluorescence and glucose control Skin autofluorescence on the forearm was associated with age (Fig. 2a) and duration of diabetes (␤ = 0.15 per 10 years, P < 0.001, and ␤ = 0.17 per 10 years, P < 0.001, respectively; Fig. 2b), and with the means of the last five HbA1c (␤ = 0.10 per 1% of HbA1c , P < 0.05) and last 10 HbA1c (␤ = 0.12 per 1% of HbA1c , P < 0.01) values, but not with the latest HbA1c value (P = 0.64). After adjusting for age as a continuous variable and eGFR divided into three categories, skin autofluorescence was found to be related to glucose control over the past 2.5 and 5 years (mean of last five HbA1c values: ␤ = 0.10 per 1% of HbA1c , P = 0.005; mean of last 10 HbA1c values: ␤ = 0.13 per 1% of HbA1c , P = 0.001), whereas the relationship with the latest HbA1c level did not reach significance (P = 0.26; Table 3). 4. Discussion Our main findings were the significant relationships between skin autofluorescence and: (1) long-term glucose control, as reflected by the means of the last five and 10 HbA1c values; and

Latest HbA1c Last 5 HbA1c Last 10 HbA1c

278 224 185

Skin autofluorescence (forearm) Regression coefficient (␤)

95 % CI

P value

0.02 0.10 0.13

−0.017–0.063 0.031–0.169 0.052–0.209

0.257 0.005 0.001

Data presented are regression coefficients.

(2) diabetes complications, including retinopathy and nephropathy. In the DCCT, skin biopsies taken 1 year before the end of the study showed increased skin glycated collagen variables in 215 patients with T1DM, while the levels were even higher in patients with poor glycaemic control [3]. In our present patients, the poor relationship between skin autofluorescence and the latest HbA1c value was consistent with the results of studies of T2DM showing non-significant (NS) [4] or weak [5,12] correlations. Statistical significance was also not reached in the two studies that included patients with T1DM [4,7], except when HbA1c was > 8%, as described in the recent report by Samborski et al. [13]. Turk et al. [14] reported a correlation (r = 0.77) between HbA1c and haemoglobin AGEs in 75 patients with diabetes of both types that was weaker (r = 0.37) in those with

Fig. 2. Skin autofluorescence (AU) on the forearm was associated with age (a), diabetes duration (b) and the means of the last five HbA1c values (c) in type 1 diabetic patients.

M. Genevieve et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

HbA1c < 8%. However, the close relationship observed in our study between skin autofluorescence and the means of the last five and 10 HbA1c values suggests that skin autofluorescence can provide additional information on longer-term glucose memory. Closer correlation of skin autofluorescence with the means of previous HbA1c values at 1 year of follow-up was also noted by Meerwaldt et al. [4] in 25 patients with T1DM. This was probably due to the long half-life of subcutaneous collagen to which AGEs link. Accumulation of AGEs is a time-dependent process that increases with chronic hyperglycaemia [15], but also with other mechanisms, involving oxidative stress, reduced eGFR [16], hepatic function [17] and blood lipid levels [18]. Accordingly, skin autofluorescence increases with age [9] and with reduced GFR [8]. The high levels of skin autofluorescence noted in our patients with diabetic complications could therefore have been due to their older age and more severe nephropathy: renal insufficiency is, by itself, associated to high skin autofluorescence even in non-diabetic subjects [16]. To discriminate among these influences, our patients were classified according to their severity of kidney injury, with results adjusted for age and eGFR. Skin autofluorescence was higher in patients who had diabetic complications, with marked differences in the small group with advanced complications: +25% with pre-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy; and + 30% with decreased eGFR. Such relationships have already been confirmed in patients with T2DM [19,20], and shown to be predictive of vascular events and mortality [6]. Three studies, involving 48 [21], 69 [22] and 133 [7] patients, respectively, found a relationship between skin autofluorescence and complications of T1DM. In the pioneering study by Meerwaldt et al. [21], skin autofluorescence was associated with coronary heart disease (OR: 7.8, n = 13), micro-albuminuria and hypertension. More recently, Chabroux et al. [7] noted an association between skin autofluorescence and nephropathy, and our present study has confirmed its association with macro-albuminuria and a reduced eGFR. Renal insufficiency is itself associated with high skin autofluorescence even in non-diabetic subjects [16], and mortality and skin autofluorescence are associated in dialysis patients [23]. In diabetic nephropathy, AGEs accumulate and lead to the release of proinflammatory cytokines and activate nuclear factor (NF)-␬B through binding to its receptor [16,24]. The absence of a link between retinopathy and skin autofluorescence, as mentioned by Chabroux et al. [7], was probably due to their smaller sample size; interestingly, they found elevated skin autofluorescence in 24 patients with severe retinopathy, although the contribution of retinopathy was no longer significant after adjusting for nephropathy. In our present study, skin autofluorescence increased with the severity of diabetic retinopathy even in patients with normal renal function. Nephropathy was not, therefore, the only explanation for the high skin autofluorescence in our patients with retinopathy. The main limitation of our study was its retrospective aspect, as skin autofluorescence would be of greater value if it could predict the complications of T1DM, as has already been seen in T2DM [5]. However, further follow-up of our patients should provide more information in that respect. Also, the fact that

353

diabetic retinopathy was assessed by an ophthalmological examination that did not systematically include retinal photography is another limitation that may have led to an underestimation of retinopathy. In our present patients, 52% had retinopathy after 22 years of diabetes, which is close to the 40% after 17 years reported by Chabroux et al. [7], who similarly evaluated retinopathy, and comparable to the 46% retinopathy rate after 15 years of diabetes in the EURODIAB study, which used retinal photography [25]. More work including more sensitive ophthalmological evaluations, especially for maculopathy, and also systematic evaluations of diabetic neuropathy are now required to further explore the links between skin autofluorescence and diabetic complications. Disclosure of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr S. Jarman, retired member of the University Victor Segalen, Bordeaux for revision of the English manuscript. Authors contributions: M.G. collected and analyzed data, and wrote and revised the manuscript. A.V. analyzed data and revised the manuscript. C.G. revised the manuscript. C.R. revised the manuscript. P.B.G. helped interpret the data, and wrote and revised the manuscript. H.G. collected and analyzed data, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. V.R. collected and analyzed data, and wrote and revised the manuscript. References [1] The DDCT research group. The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: The diabetes control and complication trial. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86. [2] Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature 2001;414:813–20. [3] Genuth S, Sun W, Cleary P, Sell DR, Dahms W, Malone J, et al. Glycation and carboxymethyllysine levels in skin collagen predict the risk of future 10-year progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the diabetes control and complications trial and epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications participants with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54:3103–11. [4] Meerwaldt R, Graaff R, Oomen PHN, Links TP, Jager JJ, Alderson NL, et al. Simple non-invasive assessment of advanced glycation endproduct accumulation. Diabetologia 2004;47:1324–30. [5] Lutgers HL, Graaf R, Links TP, Ubink-veltmaat LJ, Bilo HJ, Gans RO, et al. Skin autofluorescence as a non-invasive marker of vascular damage in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2654–9. [6] Jakus V, Rietbrock N. Advanced glycation end-products and the progress of diabetic vascular complications. Physiol Res 2004;53:131–42. [7] Chabroux S, Canouï-Poitrine F, Reffet S, Mills-Jo cour G, Morelon E, Colin C, et al. Advanced glycation end products assessed by skin autofluorescence in type 1 diabetics are associated with nephropathy, but not in retinopathy. Diabetes Metab 2010;36:152–7. [8] Gerrits EG, Smith AJ, Bilo HJG. AGEs, autofluorescence and renal function. Nephrol Dial transplant 2009;24:710–3.

354

M. Genevieve et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 39 (2013) 349–354

[9] Koetsier M, Lutgers HL, De Jonge C, Links TP, Smit AJ, Graaf R. Reference values of skin autofluorescence. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:399–403. [10] Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro 3rd AF, Feldman HI, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–12. [11] Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Austria, Vienna: Institute for statistics and mathematics of Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien; 2012. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 http://www.R-project.org [12] Gerrits EG, Lutgers HL, Kleefstra N, Groenier KH, Smit AJ, Gans ROBG, et al. Skin advanced glycation end product accumulation is poorly reflected by glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients (ZODIAC-9). Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:572–7. [13] Samborski P, Naskret D, Araszkiewicz A, Niedzwiecki P, ZozulinskaZiokiewicz D, Wierusz-Wysocka B. Assessment of skin autofluorescence as a marker of advanced glycation end product accumulation in type 1 diabetes. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2011;121:67–72. [14] Turk Z, Mesié R, Benko B. Comparison of advanced glycation end products on haemoglobin (Hb-AGE) and HbA1c for the assessment of diabetic control. Clin Chim Acta 1998;277:159–70. [15] McCance, Dyer DG, Dunn JA, Bailieke, Thorpe SR, Baynes JW, et al. Maillard reaction products and their relation to complications in insulindependant diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1993;91:2470–8. [16] Tanaka K, Yoshihiro T, Asai J, Nemoto F, Kusano Y, Suzuki H, et al. Skin autofluorescence is associated with renal function and cardiovascular diseases in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:214–20. [17] Smedsrød B, Melkko J, Araki N, Sano H, Horiuchi S. Advanced glycation end products are eliminated by scavenger-receptor-mediated endocytosis in hepatic sinusoidal kupffer and endothelial cells. Biochem J 1997;322:567–73.

[18] Galler A, Müller G, Schinzel R, Kratzsch J, kiss W, Münch G. Impact of metabolic control and serum lipids on the concentration of advanced glycation end products in the serum of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy and N(carboxymethyl)lysine Elisa. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2609–15. [19] Meerwaldt R, Links TP, Graaff R, Hoogenberg K, Lefrandt JD, Baynes JW, et al. Increased accumulation of skin advanced glycation end-product precedes and correlates with clinical manifestations of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 2005;48:1637–44. [20] Tanaka K, Tani Y, Asai J, Nemoto F, Kusano Y, Suzuki H, et al. Skin autofluorescence is associated with severity of vascular complications in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2012;29: 492–500. [21] Meerwaldt R, Lutgers HL, Links TP, Graaff R, Baynes JW, Gans RO, et al. Skin autofluorescence is a strong predictor of cardiac mortality in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:107–12. [22] Januszewski AS, Sachithanandan N, Karschimkus C, O’Neal DN, Yeung CK, Alkatib N, et al. Non-invasive mesures of tissue autofluorescence are increased in type 1 diabetes complications and correlate with a non-invasive measure of vascular dysfunction. Diabet Med 2012;29: 726–33. [23] Meerwaldt R, Hartog JW, Graaff R, Huisman RJ, Links TP, den Hollander NC, et al. Skin autofluorescence, a measure of cumulative metabolic stress and advanced glycation end products, predicts mortality in hemodialysis patient. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:3687–93. [24] Forbes JM, Cooper ME, Oldfield MD, Merlin CT. Role of advanced glycation end products in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:5254–8. [25] Sjolie AK, Stephenson J, Aldington S, Kohner E, Janka H, Stevens L, et al. Retinopathy and vision loss in insulin-dependent diabetes in Europe. The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Ophtalmology 1997;104:252–60.