MANAGEMENTOFMALESEXUALDYSFUOJCTION/PENILESURGERY Tuesday, February 26,15.30-17.00 hrs,RoomII
P40
THE APPLICATION OF OPEN ENDOSCOPY FOR AUGMENTATION
706
705 ALBUGINEA-SAPHENOUS RELIABLE TECHNIQUE
“GASLESS” VIDEOASSISTED FALLOPLASTY
KourbatovDimitry Department
GRAFTS: AN FOR ENLARGEMENT
EFFECTIVE AND PHALLOPLASTY
Colombo Fulvio, Guarneri Andrea, Cazzaniga Alberta, Ceresoli Andrea, Grass0 Macola Gaetano, Kartalas Goumas Joannis, Austoni Edoardo
of Urology, Clinical Hospital 6, Moscow, Russia
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Nowadays, endoscopic technique widely applied for the performance of many conventional surgical operations. However. the management of some andrological problems hasn’t yet been successful. There are many alternatives to the conventional augmentation falloplasty but none of those techniques can be considered as the “gold standard” therapy. As a rule, their performance entails the need to make wide incisions resulting in rough scars. The penile girth enhancement methods also have many disadvantages. The application of endoscopy for a penis length and girth enhancement with minimum incisions would be of great benefit for a patient. MATERIALS & METHODS: We have got an initial clinical experience of the videoassisted endoscopy (OGVE) for the application of open “gasless” augmentation falloplasty. II patients (age 23-35) have been operated for the enhancement of the girth and/or length of the penis. Indications for operations were small penises with length in a state of erection less than 10-l I cm. The suspender and fundiforme ligaments were sectioned through a small 2.5 cm incision in the pubic area by means of OGVE. Girth enhance was performed using one or two vascularised subcutaneous fat flaps, also taken by OGVE from low abdomen wall region with the base near the pubic bone. Subcutaneous space was created around the penis by finger and OGVE dissection. Fat flaps were rotated downwards and stuffed in that space. Then the tips of flaps were fixed in the aubglanular area and to the Buck’s fascie beneath the pubic bone. Mini drains in to the subcutaneous space were placed. Every patient used weight device after operation. RESULTS: After augmentation falloplasty erected penile length enlarged at 2.2. 3.3 cm, and penis girth increased by 3.6-4.5 cm following 3-5 month postoperatively. All patients were satisfied with surgical correction. CONCLUSION: The application of endoscopy for a penis length and girth enhancement is considered to be potentially useful tool and rather beneficial for patients resulting in excellent functional and cosmetic outcome.
Department and School of Urology, University of Milan, S. Giuseppe HospitalAfaR, Milan, Italy INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Since 1995 we have been using an original technique that enables penile enlargement to be achieved by means of enhancement surgery on the corporal albuginea. We now are able to report the long-term results of our case-load. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between 1995 and 1998, 48 patients who wished to increase their penile diameter underwent enlargement phalloplasty with bilateral saphenous grafts. Patients considered eligible for surgery were either patients with penile hypoplasia (reconstructive surgery) or functional penile dysmorphophobia (cosmetic surgery). The average pre-operative penile diameter in a flaccid state and during erection was found to be 2.2 cm (1.6-2.9 cm) and 3.1 cm (2.2-3.9) respectively. Before surgery the patients were informed of the experimental nature of the surgical procedure, of the possible complications and of the need for a thorough follow-up for study purposes during the nine months following the operation. The increase in volume of the corpora cavernous was achieved by placing saphenous grafts into bilateral longitudinal openings in the albuginea along the whole length of the penis. A clinical check-up was carried out 9 months after surgery. Telephone interviews were used for the 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The average post-operative diameter of the flaccid penis was found to be 2.5 cm (1.7-3.2), with a statistically significant difference (p
708
707 HOW TO MANAGE PATIENTS REFERRING TO ANDROLOGICAL CLINICS FOR PENILE LENGHTENING PROCEDURES
SKIN
Mondaini
Rees Rowland,
Nicola’,
Gordon’.
Gontero
Caldarera
Ponchietti
Roberto’
‘Urology,
Careggi
Hospital,
‘Urology, King’s Hospital,
at the numbers
Clinical
history,
examination compared
of patients
including
recently
published
estimate
the length
the
presenting
length
of
circumference.
(Eur.
size.
according
No
patients
when (37.3%)
they
felt
39: 183-6).
“normal”
patients
one patient
thought
also
complained
a “normal”
IO (IS%)
penile
demonstration \urrery.
should
men
penis
were
be made
also
asked
to
subjects was
recalled
smaller
In our
helpful.
WC
&
carcinoma balanitis
Grafting
METHODS:
(mean age 42 years).
The aetiology
in 7 patients, Foumier’s xerotica
obliterans
and
was performed
of the patients’
gangrene
under
series,
suggest
in any men wcking
their
should
their
none
in the
erotic
Grafts
complications
were
assessed
for
were reviewed.
on penile
grafts were used in 12 cases with good take in 83%
successful,
prior to grafting resulted in
result. The use of split-skin graft on the glans was universally
but when used in the shaft resulted in a constriction
that inhibited
surgery
could be
CONCLUSION:
The use of split-skin
graft has been found to be a valuable
and none any
to show them how
documentation
Split-skin
erectile function, despite good take.
images.
lengthening
RESULTS:
a less satisfactory
In 25
of the patients
an opinion
patients
was: penile
in 2 patients, and single cases of
lymphoedema.
(10/12) and partial take in 17% (2112). Radiotherapy
“normal” percentile
were.
to our nomogram that
penile
starting
friend%’
after seeing
by the
range from
the 2.5
the problem
than
on fourteen
conditions
22 (32.8%) only
not able to eshmate
in the teenageyears
length. Moat
we
length
found the use of a nomogram
abnormality. to other
and
about
anatomical
penile
and
in the nomogram
tlaccid.
penis according
compared
length
was worried
classified as having a severely short they
MATERIALS
physical states
while
(I .5%)
both
disease.
age
correction.
accurate
were
show that most men who seek penile
penile
a median
penile
surgery
three years of experience of using grafts to treat benign, malignant and traumatic
over a
norms.
stretched
In penile reconstructive
cosmesis and function, and the postoperative
(22.4%)
started
of
fully
of a short penis only
42 (62.7%)
the problem
with
an
described
All
clinic
surgical
& OBJECTIVES:
seeking
penis.
of I2 cm).
their
CONCLUSION: Our data ocerestrmate
and
wa\ found to have a penile length
patient
to our nomogram.
childhood,
I5
and
measures
flaccid
range as previously
and only
patients
value
the
patients
and requesting
concerning
both
sired
penis.
57 (85%)
5
Urol.2001:
and erect,
IO to 17 cm (median penile
Urology. Institute of Urology, London. United Kingdom
full thickness and split skin grafts can be used. The aim of this study is to review
We wished
the accepted
sixty-seven
desired
of male patients
penis size with
questionnaire
reference
the
Minhas Suks, Kalsi Jas. Ralph David
Messina
is increasing. andrology
IIEF
RESULTS: 44 (65.7%) complained erect
Muir
RECONSTRUCTION
Andrea’,
“Urology.
to a University
penis”
in
of a normal
The number
of “short Data
recorded
to the normal
tlaccid
Kingdom,
of “short penis”
We evaluated
obtained.
were
both
United
their perceived
complaining
were
while
Filippo’,
Concerns about penile size and a
for the problem
and correlate
16-55)
circumference
London,
in the male population.
MATERIALS & METHODS: of 27 (range
Loro
INTRODUCTION
consultation
two year period
Di
Stefano' , Bongini
Biscioni
*Urology, Novara Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Italy,
Hospital.
& OBJECTIVES:
penis are common
to look
Alessandro’,
Italy
INTRODUCTION longer
Natali
S. Sriprasad’,
Florence,
College
Messina,
an andrological
Paolo’.
EmanueleJ.
IN PENILE
GRAFTING
of
wch
lengthening
a
technique
in penile reconstructive
surgery
penis. However on the shaft, a full-thickness
on both the shaft and glans of the graft is advisable to minimise the
risk of contracture. European Urology Supplements 1 (2002)No. 1, pp. 179