Sleep and Movement Differentiates Actions of Two Types of Somatostatin-Expressing GABAergic Interneuron in Rat Hippocampus

Sleep and Movement Differentiates Actions of Two Types of Somatostatin-Expressing GABAergic Interneuron in Rat Hippocampus

Neuron Corrections Sleep and Movement Differentiates Actions of Two Types of Somatostatin-Expressing GABAergic Interneuron in Rat Hippocampus Linda K...

101KB Sizes 2 Downloads 63 Views

Neuron

Corrections Sleep and Movement Differentiates Actions of Two Types of Somatostatin-Expressing GABAergic Interneuron in Rat Hippocampus Linda Katona,* Damien Lapray, Tim J. Viney, Abderrahim Oulhaj, Zsolt Borhegyi, Benjamin R. Micklem, Thomas Klausberger,* and Peter Somogyi* *Correspondence: [email protected] (L.K.), [email protected] (T.K.), [email protected] (P.S.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.023

(Neuron 82, 872–886; May 21, 2014) In the original article, there was an error in the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical testing of firing rate changes. The corrected p values changed the evaluation of individual cells under certain behavioral and network states but do not change the conclusions of the paper for the overall population of a given cell type. The legend to Figure 5 (F and G) should say that the measured distribution of the O-LM cell was similar to the median (black) of the surrogate set (p = 0.9, during sleep; p = 0.4, during wakefulness; two-sample KS tests), the legend to Figure S4 should say that three O-LM cells (B) changed their firing rates significantly during sleep SWRs (two-sample KS-tests, n = 3 cells in total, p < 0.05, for all cells) and for cells LK06ah and LK13k in the awake condition, the measured rates were similar to those expected from the surrogate sets, whereas, the rate of ZsB43d was lower than expected (two-sample KS-tests, LK06ah, p = 0.2; LK13k, p = 0.1; ZsB43d, p < 0.05), and the last paragraph of the Results section should say that during wakefulness, the firing rate during SWRs was significantly lower for one O-LM cell and higher for the other three cells than that expected (CDFs p < 0.05 for n = 4 cells; Figures 5G and S4B and Table 2). The authors regret the error and any confusion this may have caused.

A Synaptotagmin Isoform Switch during the Development of an Identified CNS Synapse Olexiy Kochubey,* Norbert Babai, and Ralf Schneggenburger* *Correspondence: [email protected] (O.K.), [email protected] (R.S.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.024

(Neuron 90, 984–999; June 1, 2016) In the original article, a reciprocal expression regulation of Syt1 and Syt2 mRNAs that had been observed before in the chick ciliary ganglion and lumbar spinal cord (Lou and Bixby 1995; Campagna et al. 1997, respectively), was not mentioned. This work is now discussed in the corrected version of the paper, and the references have been added. The authors apologize for the oversight of the previous work. The authors would also like to point out that although Syt1 mediates a majority of fast release at pre-calyceal synapses, their work does not rule out the possibility that other, non-identified Ca2+ sensor(s) could contribute to release early on. A sentence to this effect was added to the Discussion section. The authors regret any confusion this may have caused.

Neuron 91, 1183, September 7, 2016

1183