SOLUTION BY THE STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD OF A QUASILINEAR TWO-PHASE PROBLEM OF THE STEFAN TYPE WITH WEAK CONSTRAINTSON THE INPUT D.4TA OF THE PROBLEM* R. D. BACHELIS
and V. G. MELAMED Moscow
(1) “Solution of a quasilinear problem papers: and (2) “Solution of a quasilinear method”,
(THE complete texts of the author’s of the Stefan type by the straight-line
problem of the Stefan type in the case of an initial function which is non-differential and inconsistent with the boundary conditions”, have been deposited in VINITI: (1) No. 3941-72 Dep. 20~; (2) No. 3942-72 Dep., 15p.) The existence it is required the conditions
of a solution
of the following
y(Y
is proved:
to find U(X, t) on (0 < I < I, 0 < t < T),
(A(x, u)u,), - c(x, u) Ut = 0, u(y(t),
problem
0
=
(t) j!/‘(t)
0, =
t =
Y (0)
10, Tl,
k~s=y~~~--o
t E (0, Tl,
-
=
Yn E
huxi.,=8(f!+0,
on
[O, ~1 from
x E (0, v(t)) u (2 (L), I), (0, l),
10, Tl, kIx=o = ‘I,(4 u(0, t)), hUxlx=l= !?2(4 u(I, t)), u(5, 0) = (r;(J), 5 E K44,
(A)
y(t)
t E
t E P, 77,
where h, C, qi, i = 1, 2; y, c$ are given functions of their arguments. The existence of a solution of (A) is proved for a !I’* > 0 satisfying the inequality T*max(
max h(s,cp)Jf,
[
rnin y(z)]-’ \E[o II
where M is a Lipschitz
max k(z,q)M,
max Qi(t,O), !Elo.r*l
Ic,lO.Y,l
xauo.~l
max Q~(r,o)l :I: G[O.T’l
< min (2 - y0, Yo),
constant
for c5(x).
Also in the first paper the uniqueness of the solution found is proved. By the scheme of Rote, we specify an h > 0 and put N = [T’IL-I]. L,, = nh, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . , N. The system (A) is replaced by the system of ordinary differential
*Zh.
v>hisl.
Mat. mat. Fiz.,
12, 3, 828-829,
342
1972.
Solution
equations
(B) for Us,
. . . , N.
The following
by the straight-line
y, on the straight theorem
343
method
lines
(.t, t,,), 0 < I < I, ?z = I, 2,
is also proved.
Theorem 1 Let (I):
y0 E (0, l),
4 (x) be differentiable
in the closed
intervals
[O, ~01,
[go, 11, Cp(s) < O* z E [O, YOI?rPCs)2 Ot s E [YOt‘1, cf(YO)= O; (2) Qi9 q1 and q2 are non-decreasing and non-increasing
(t, u), i = 1, 2, be continuous,
functions of u, respectively, q?(t, 0) 2 0, 0 < t G T’; (3) A, C, A,, ,A, are continuous with respect to all the arguments for u # 0, where A, AZ, $, satisfy a Lipschitz condition on u for u < 0 and u > 0, and as u + 0 f 0 the continuous limits limh(s, u), limc(2, U), lim h,, lim i.,, hl > h(z, u) > h? > 0, cl
go
~(5,
U)
2
cp >
Y E [0, T']
every
and is unique.
o,
Y(S)
exist.
Then for
an h E (0,y] such that the solution
(B) exists
a~,
there exists
>
o;
at,
az,
cl,
Q,
yl
=
const
Here the y, E (0, I), Ii, (2) < 0, z E [O, Y”), u,(z)
> 0, x E (4,
II
IU”(Z) 1, Iu,,‘(s) 1, 1(y, - ynei) /h 1 are kmnded by constants.
and
Theorem 2 Let all the conditions of Theorem 1 be satisfied and in addition h(x, (I) E ~(t, u) E C(434),q(z) E P.1 on IO, ~01U [YO, 11, y(x) be continuous, the a Lipschitz condition on t. functions qi(t, n) E C(‘,‘), i = 1, 2, and satisfy P5),
Finally, q'(Z) =
let the matching qz(l,
and is unique
cp(!))
conditions
be satisfied.
in the class
h(O, CF(0) )#(O)
Then u(x, t), y(t),
of sufficiently
a(k CP(I)) of (A), exists
= qi (0, CP(011, the solution
smooth solutions.
In the second paper Theorem 1 is generalized schitz condition on [O, Z]. The following theorem
for a d(x) satisfying is also proved.
a Lip-
Theorem Let all the conditions qi(t,
u), i = 1, 2, satisfy
of Theorem a Lipschitz
1 be satisfied. condition
In addition,
on t and u; (2)
a Lipschitz u P 0 there exist h,,, h,,, ;I,,,, c+, c,,, satisfying arguments. Then a solution of (A) exists for t E [0, T’], Therefore, a proof of the existence of a solution does not require matching of the boundary and initial
Note. the case
let:
(1)
for
z E [O, I], condition on both
(A) has been given which conditions.
T(Z) > 0, 5 E [0, yO], cp(~) G 0, z E [yo, I] is reduced The case considered above by replacing x by I - x.
Translated by J. Berry
to