Coordmatlon Chmmtrv Rtwews Elsevter Pubhshmg Company, Amsterdam - Prmted m The NetherlAnds
SOME ASPECTS OF THE COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
OF IRON(III)*
S A COTTON Departtmwt
of Chemrstr~. Queen Mar? Coliege. Mile End R_oad I ondon E I (Gt BRUNEI)
(Recewed October Sth, 1971)
CONTENTS Clocurl
185
ot symbols Introduction
186
Physwal techniques applicable to lrzn( III) complewx Magnetism (0 Electromc spectra \iI) (111) Electron paramagnetlc resonance blos\bauer spectroscopy (Iv)
186 187 187 189 191
Complews ot oxygen-cont.nnmg hgands hlonodcntate (0 BI- and terdentate (10 (111) XIl\ed 0,N donors Acids (carboxyhc and ammo) (Iv)
192 192 196 197 198
Complews-of nttrogendonor hgands hlonodentate (0 Bldentdte (and other) hgands (11)
199 199 201
Complexes ot hahdex
202
Complexes ot sulphur donors
‘05
Complexes of phosphorus and arsemc donors hlonodentate (1) Polydentate donors (II)
2r1 211 ‘12
Complexes of carbon donor5
211
Conclusion
214 215
Acknowledgements Appendlv
316
References
218
GLOSSARY peff V
6 sh H D. E
OF SYhlBOLS
effective magnetic moment (m Bohr magnetons, B \l ) vibrattonal stretchmg mode vibrational bendmg mode shoulder applied field zero-field spltttmg parameters
* No reprmts avadable Coot-d Chetn Rev,
8 (1972)
i-f firs s IlV B. C k
Hamdtoman operator spm quantum number total spm of ss stem mxrowave quantum Racah parameters orbital reduction factor
5 A COTTON
186
A INTRODUCTION Despite nation
,md blologlCdl
the mdustnal
chemistry
then, a number
unportdnce
of iron-contdmmg
of the metal hds been sadly neglected, of groups
hdd studled
a conslderable
systems,
the coordl-
especially m recent years
number
of complexes,
Before
the relevant
ref-
erences may be found m the book by SldgwlLk ’ and tn the treatises by Gmelm 2, Mellor 3 and Pascal 4 This comparative lack of Interest has been espeLra1ly mdrked m the case of ~ron(IlI),
largely owing
to the propertres
of the d’ Ion
Two of the prmcrpal physical techniques currently used for studying coordrndtron complexes are eiectromc absorption spectroscopy dnd pdrdmagnellc sus_eptlblhty measurements, for the high-spin Fe” ion, the free ion ground stdte IS 6S, becoming 6Al m a weak crystal tield There are no other sextuplet states, so that all exerted states of the c/s Ion hdve d dlfferent spm multlphcrty to the ground state, and transrtions to them arc spin-forbidden Hence the dbsorptlon bands due to V-4” transitrons are extremely weak dnd dre frequently obscured by charge-transfer bands trallmg mto the vrslble region of the spectrum A further consequence
of the ground state bemg an orbltal
smglet 12 that there 1s no orbltal
contrlbu-
tron to the mdgnetrc moment and thus the observed moments scarcely vary from the spmonly value It IS sometimes possible to dlstmgulsh between tetrahedral and octahedral coordination on the basis of electromc spectra, but no such dlstmctlon can be made as a result of mdgnetlc
measurements
that the study of rron(lI1)
It 1s probably mamly for these and certain chemical reasons complexes has been neglected until quite recently_
Thus IS unfortunate, as S = 112,312 and S/2 ground states are hnown to exist, and other physlcal teLhmques such as EPR, Mdssbauer and vlbratlonal spectra can grve a good deal of information about the electronic and molecular structure of ferric complexes. This review IS mainly concerned with describing complexes that have been Isolated m the sohd state, and solution data are only mentroned when they have a bearmg upon the species present m the sohd phase. All basic complexes have been excluded, as have polynuclear systems, which merit a separate, more theoretrcal, tredtrnent In dddrtron to the sources l-4 referred to earlrer, Colton and Canterford’s splendid book ’ also covers some of the ground considered here Before proceeding varrous spectroscopic
to the drscussron techniques
of complexes,
for studying
iron(lI1)
we briefly
consider
the usefulness
of
systems
B PHYSICAL TECHNIQUES APPLICABLE TO IRON(II1) COMPLEXES
-
Good treatments of EPR, Mdssbauer, electronic and vIbratIonal spectra are, for example, avdilable m Hill and Day’s text6 whilst numerous books and review volumes have dealt with magnetism and electromc spectra At a sampler level, Greenwood’s review ’ 1s probably still the best simple mtroductlon to Mossbauer spectra No really good simple mtroductlon to EPR exists although Goodman and Raynor have assembled ’ an excellent combmatlon of theoretical and experimental data and togethkr with d suitable text such as that by Atkms
187
COORDINATION CHI-WSTRY 01 IRON(II1)
and Symons”
this constitutes
a reasonable mtroduLtlon
to EPR
The ferric ion has five 3d electrons so that it IS evident that t&e: (S = _5/2), t&e: (S = 3/2) and t:g (.S = l/2) ground states might arlse. In tact, the t&e; configuration cannot be the ground are known
term m an octahedra1
in relatively
1 1 and 12) Mdgnetlc
or tetrahedral
few cases, normally susceptlblhty
where
measurements
&and
field lo and S = 3/2 systems
there is a strong (preferably
tetragonal
field (cf
over a temperature
refs.
range)
afford excellent means of determlmng the ground term Ions with a 6A 1 ground state (S = S/2) have moments close to the 5 92 6 M predlcted by the spm-only formula for an orbltdl singlet As there are no other states with the same spin multlphclty, large devlatlons cannot be due to the mixing-m of excited states into the ground state (as IS usually m the case of A or E ground srates) although h&-order perturbations are probably sible for slight devlatlons frequently noted.
invoked respon-
Any significant deviations are probably due either to impure materials (even a small amount of Fez O3 can cause slgmfkan t devlatlons) or to possible dlmer formatlon, where antlferromagnetlc interaction can lead to low pet7 values Little can be said about the magnetism of complexes with S = 3/2 ground to the paucity
of experimental
data. Generally
moments
states,
owmg
are close to 4.0 B,M , the spm-
only value being slightly less than thu, thus the ground term In these systems IS probably 4A2, for which only a small orbital contrlbutron to the moment 1s expected, m agreement with EPR results ” For a system with one unpaired electron, the ground state in an octahedra1 field is 2 Tzg, thus the preseme of an ‘orbital’ contrlbutron to the moment, which should thus be temperature-dependent, IS expected_ F~gg~s I3 has calculated the variation of peff with temperature as a function of the axial field, also makmg allowance for covalency F~gg~s and co-workers results and have, however, more recently shown l4 that this method can @ve ambiguous therefore the hmltatrons Inherent should be borne m mmd when mterpretmg results Moments reported he m the range 2 O-2 6 B M at ambient temperatures and decrease upon coolmg The presence of high-spm impurities even in very small amount can easdy inflate measured susceptlbrlltles, as has been noted for [Fe(S2Cz O,),] 3- (see p. 208) m particular This pomt 1s even more important m vrew of the mstablhty of many low-spm iron(ll1) complexes
(li) Electronrc spectra Although the basic features of the ‘W-d” spectra of high-spm ferric complexes to be reasonably well understood, much work remains to be done in this field.
appear
In a cubic crystal field, the ‘S free ion term transforms as 6A1 ; no other spm-sextuplet state exrsts (see Fig I), so that all d-d
Coord Chetm Rev, 8 (1972)
transltions
are spin-forbidden
and hence
rather
weak,
S
188
(typically, probably spur-orbit
extinction coefficients E N 0.01 - 0 1 m octahedral made possrble by admrxture of spm-quartet character coupling
Certain
free ran terms are independent nephelauxetrc effect
states originating
systems) These bands are mto the ground state vra
from the 4F(4A2),
of 1ODq thus gives an unusually
A_ CO-t-l-ON
aD(4E) direct
and 4G(4E,
measure
4A ,)
of the
Despite this however, certain problems arise and high-spin Fe3’ d-d spectra are generally more drfficult to assign than those of the rsoelectromc bin*+ complexes The mam reason for this IS that charge transfer absorptron occurs at lower energy ID the ferrrc complexes, and often most of the d-d bands are obscured No defimte assrgnment of the d-d bands in the electromc spectrum of the hexaquo ran seems yet to have been made, owing to the ready formatron of hydroxy complexes The best results we have are probably those of 3+ ion (see p_ 193) although even these authors felt Holt and Dmgle44 for the [Fe(urea)6] drsmchned to make defirnte assignments Few data are available for S = 3/2 systems, many transrtrons are spur-allowed so that extmctron coeffictents m the range l-100 may be expected, especrally as there 1s hkely to
be d good dedl of enhanLenlent through overlap wtth Lharge transfer bands
189
COORDINATION CHEhlISTRY OF IRON(III)
Ewald et When ’ T2 becomes the ground state we expect some spm-allowed transItIons al l5 have examined the spectra m the vlslble and UV regions of a number of iron-sulphur complexes_ They obtam reasonable 1ODq values of ca 20,000-25,000 cm-’ although the E values (up to 103) are unusually of charge correct.
transfer
(ui) Electron
transitions
paramagnetrc
high
mlxmg
However,
with “&d”
resonance
we know bands
httle at present
about
so that their assignments
the effects are probably
(EPR)
(a) S = .5/Z Whdst most early EPR work on high spm systems was concerned with the elucldatlon of the quartlc terms m the spm Hamlltoman for virtually cubic systems, we find that many of the parameters m the complete spm Hamdtoman l6 17, VIZ
-6S(S+
1)+3S’(S+
I)*]
+S;
+S”]
+A SI
may be neglected
for D values > ca 0 01 cm- ’ The terms m a and b are only really important m near-cubic fields whilst we usually neglect the hyperfine term because of the low abundance of “Fe (I = l/2, abundance 2 2%) We therefore rewrite the spm Hamdtoruan as f./=&HS+D[s;-35/12]
+EESC
-$I
where D 1s the ‘out-of-plane’ zero field sphttmg parameter and E- the ‘m-plane’ zero field sphttmg parameter_ The real g value 1s generally taken ‘* to be very close to 2 00 Real ami effectrve g values At this stage It IS very convenient to define the difference between real and effective g values. This IS necessary for systems where S > l/2, where It
IS often expedient to refer to features of the spectra by geft values rather than field values For high-spm Fe3’ at X-band frequencies (9 3 GHz) signals are often found which can be analysed
m terms of gl ca
Hamlltoman &f
1 100 gauss and g,, ca 3300 gauss
Takmg
a fictltlous
spm
with S = l/2, we define
hV =pHres
so that this signal can be described m terms of the effectme g valuesg, N 6 g,, N 7 In fact, this type of signal arlses from D (large) (2 ca 0 2 cni’ ), h (= EYD) N_O m the spm Ham&
toman, correspondmg to a strong trlgonal or tetragondl dlstortlon I9 (lt 1s Important to note that real g values are independent of microwave frequency whdst “effectlve”g values are frequency-dependent ) Coord
Cirem Rev, 8 (1972)
S A COTTON
190
Lrkewlse, d nearly rsotroptc resonance 1s sometimes found ca 1500 gauss at X-band and IS described as geff N 4 3, arising I9 from D > ca 0 2 cm-‘, X N l/3. Because of its isotropic nature and statIstica effects rt generally appears much more intensely than other transttrons and usually
domtnates the spectrum_ For near-cubrc systems (D N 0.00 1-O 05 cm-‘, h N 0) five transttrons appear, centred on g N 2.00, these are 15/2 > + 13/2 > ,13/2 > + I l/2 >, I l/2 > +1-l/2 > ,1-l/2 > *l-3/2 > and I-3/2 > -+I-5/3 > transitions Much of the EPR behaviour of high-spm dS systems 1s summarlsed in Dowsing and Gibson’s paper ” (b) S = 3/-3 The spin Hamtltonian H =/3gHS+
D[S;
is -
15/12]
+E[S;
-S;]
Typically for D large and h ca. 0, effective values g1 N 4, g,, N 2 are obtained as m the case ” of distorted Cr**Lcomplexes such as Cr(acac) s However, few data are available (c) S = 1/z The theory has been developed simple
spur Hamrltoman
H=P[gx is taken
H,.S,
by Bleaney
and O’Brien
and modtfied
by Grtffith*r
a
of the form
+g,,
HY S, +gr
and a low-symmetry
Hz Sri
perturbation
c(q), q(xz) and t@z) so that then form of the ground doublet to be
considered
energies
to split the one-hole
real functions
are A, - v/2 and v/2 respectively
Takmg
the
x=A4 Il+>-tBl~;>+cI-l+> x’=
AI-l->--f?I~;>+CIl->
where A, B and C are the coefficients of the wave functions of the ground doublet, the mteractton of these states with the magnetic field, the g values dre obtained
from
gx = 2[324C - B* + kB(C-A)&] g,, = 2[2AC gz = 2[A2
+ B* + kB(C+A)fi] -B*
+ C* + k(.4*-C*)]
and A*
+B*
+C*
= 1
where r’c1s the orbltal
reductron
factor.
The values
of V and A are related*’
to the coeffi-
cients A. B and C and hence V and A may be obtamed This, of course, 1s a shghtly modlfied crystal field approach and makes no allowance for mteractlon with charge-transfer states or configuratrons such as figeg The general effect of not mcludmg these terms 1s that inflated k values (often > 1 0) are obtamed A molecular orbrtal approach would be
COORDINATION TABLE
CHEMISTRY
Or
IRON(‘!I)
1
Reported
prmcrpal values of theg-tensor
Complex
kl
for low-spm Iron(II1)
I
iIT2I
complekes k3
I
hlednnn ’
Ref 199.219
(Ph4P)31Fe(SzC2(CN)2)31
2 225
2 114
1 986
a
Fe(SzCOEt)3
2 193
2 143
1 992
b
199
Fe(S2CSEt)3
2 178
2 131
1998
b
199
FdS2CPh)3
2 155
2 094
2 008
C
Fe(hIcCSCHCShle)3
2 14
2 09
2 01
.I
213
Te(MeCSCHCOUe)3
2 341
2 182
1 930
d
199
Fe(PhCSCHCOPh)s
2 330
2 171
I 950
e
199
re(PhCSCHC0MeJ3
2 333
2 175
1 933
e
199
Fe(MeCSCHCOPh)
3
Fe(S2Chhle2)3 IFe(py)2&C2002)2
Ied
199
2 308
2 177
1 938
e
199
2 111
2 076
2 015
f
197
2 13”
1 99 b
g
199
7- 13L’
199b
3
199
I+(blpy)3(Pf6)3
261
1 61 b
!
149
Fe(4,4’-dmb)3(PT6)3
2 64 a
1 3Sb
f
149
Fe(5,5’-dmb)3(PI-&
260”
160b
f
149
Fe(phen)s(PF,)3
2 69 a
1 lgb
f
149
&i-c(CN)6
2 35
092
f
21
] %HzO
KBalFe&C202)3
a
2 10
’ The followng abbrewatlons are used II, solid b, CHCI,, c PhMe d, CHZt&, e C6&,, f. CoIfl analague, g, py (all solvents frozen) d The followmg abbrevlatlons for hgands are used py = p\ rldme hip) = 3_.2-blpvrld>l 4 4 -dmb = 4.4 -dunethylblpy, 5.5’-dmb = 5 S’dlmeth) Iblp) , phen = 1, IO-phcnatthrolme
but so little IS known about the excited states that thrs 1s not at present possible Assignments of the electromc spectra are a prerequisite Prmclpal g values for low-spm
preferred
Iron(IIl) complexes are listed m Table 1
(IV) Mussbauer spectroscop) A conventent 6 = const
expression
F [ ix(o)
for the Isomer shift, 6, IS
12abwrber - Ix(O) IL”,1
- where Sr IS the difference m radu between the excited and ground states and the terms 111 x(O) refer to the S-electron density at the nucleus S-electron density depends upon both oxldatton state dnd co-ordmatlon number, m fact, a comept of “partial isomer shift”, whereby the total isomer shift may be regarded as the Coorri
CXem Rev , 8 (1972)
S A COTTON
192
sum of the partial Isomer shifts for the donor atoms (for the same oxldatlon state of t’le see so ref 149) A second parameter frequently obtained al metal) has been developed** ( from Mossbauer
spectra
IS the quadrupole
sphttmg,
A or AiE This occurs
when
there IS an
electric field gradlent (EFG) at the nucleus, there exist both ‘valence’ dnd ‘latttce’ contnbutlons to the EFG, the former arising from an uneven electron dlstrtbutlon. Thus, neglectmg lattice contnbutlons. octahedral high spm Fe3* (fzgei) should give rise to no quadrupole sphttrng,
whilst octahedral
low-spin
Fe3’ (tGg) should
exhlblt
such sphttmg
Experimental
results generally bear out these expectations, high-spm species have AE values of cd O-O 5 mm set-’ (g enerdlly at the lower end of the range) whilst A E values for low-spin system5 are frequently as much as 3 mm set’ A notable exceptlon to this IS the S = S/2 system ‘43 Fe [N(SIMe3)2] 3 where the quadrupole sphttmg 1s 5 12 mm set-’ This mdy drlse from dn exceptIonally large contrlbutlon from the ‘valence’ part, due to the strong tngondl field, and also the ‘valence’ and ‘lattice’ contrlbutlons having the same sign C -COMPLCXLS
DI- OXYGCNCONTAINING
LIGANDS
(I) Mormdentate (a) IVater
The salts of the oxydclds
Fe( NO3 )3 -9H2 0,
Fe(C104)3
1OH2 0 and Fez (SO4)3
1OH20
are well known, bemg obtained from acid solution as pale pmk soltds The nitrate appears, from EPR results to contain trlgonally dlstorted hexaquo-fernc Ions 23 with D z 0 08 cm-’ D values up to 0 2 cm-’ have been reported 24 for the hexaquo ion m several ferric nlums X-ray structural locate v(Fe-OH*)
study
would
be welcomed
m the perchlorate
for a hexaquo
and nitrate
complex,
Raman
study
falled to
complexes
The yellow ferric chloride hexahydrdte has been shown 25 to possess the structure trarzs-[FeC12(0H2)4]+C1--2H20, analogous to FeCl, -4H20 (ref 26) The far-IR spectrum of this compound has been reported 27 to Lontam absorption bands at 374-358 cm-’ and 305 cm-’ (possibly v(Fe-0H2) and v(Fe-Cl) respectively) wlulst the Raman spectrum 23 shows bands at 418 cm-’ and 298 cm-’ (v(Fe-OH,)) and 255 cm-’ (v(Fe-Cl)) The nature of the s?ecles present m aqueous solutions of ferric chlonde IS m some doubt, despite the amount of work done 2s-31 , solutions dilute m Fe3+ and concentrated m HCl contam largely FeCli, but at h&er Fe3’ concentrations octahedral and polymeric species are present EPR of FeC l3 *6H2 0 m AlC13 *6H2 0 has been studled 23 s2 and Interpreted m terms of the spin Hamiltomdn parameters D N 0.15 cm’ and X = 0 It has been suggested 23 that these parameters may be accounted for by the ferric Ion havmg assumed the configuration tram[ Fe(OH2 )4C12 !’ Treatment of FeC13 .6H2 0 with SbCls yields 33 the complex fraiu-[Fe(OH,), Cl2 ] +SbCl,.4H, 0, the crystal structure 34 and Raman spectra 23 h&ve been nnestlgated Another compound 1s (NH4j2 [FeCls -OH2 1, which forms beautiful red crystals when an aqueous solution of ferric chloride and ammonium chloride IS allowed to evaporate slowly The crystal structure has been reported 35 as has that of the mdrum
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
01- IRON(111)
193
analogue 36, the EPR spectrum of the drluted terms of D = 0 086 cm-’ , h = 0 1 1, conststent
icon complex wrth sltghtly
to be more fully mvestrgated are the mrxed hahde
has been Interpreted ” m dtstorted C4, symmetry Stall
specres 37 Ma [FeCl,
Brs -OH,]
and
Ma [ FeCla Bra OH2 ] (M = Rb. Cs). Other hydrates mclude FeBra -6Ha 0, about which httle ts known owing to tts tendency to decompose on heating There IS, of course. the possrbrhty that tt has a structure srmrlar to Fe& *6H20 Ferric fluortde forms two hydrates, FeF3 -3Ha 0 and FeFs -4tH20. the trthydrate
adopts
a nearly
regular
octahedral
structure
” m whtch
adjacent
octdhedra
share apices tn the direction of the c-axts The d-d spectr.t of ferric bromtde and fluortde species in aqueous solutton have been studied recently 3y, but JS with the chloride complexes more work IS requtred to clear up the sttudtton No complex ton [FeBrs OHa] ahas been reported, unlike [lnBrs OH2 ] *- (rets _ 23,40), a number of terrttluorrde complexes are known which contain water that IS possrbly coordmated4r They are of two types M2 FeFs xH2 0 (M = Na K, x = $.M=K,_Y= 1,M=Ti._r=3,~1=Ag,x=3)and MFeFs 7H20 (M = Cd Fe. Co, NI), the latter probably ions Further mvestrgdtron of these systems by modern welcome. (6) Ureas The complexes
contammg octahedral spectroscoptc methods
M(OH2 )c would be
(X = Cl04 N03, Cl) readily crystalhse from aqueous solutron 42 , EPR results 43 indicdte that they contain slightly dtstorted [Fe(urea)6] ‘+ tons, m accordance with the poldrised single-crystal electronic spectra of [Fe(uredje] 3*(C104)a, which is reported to be trrgondlly distorted 4. bands were noted at 12,500, 17,000, 23 030 and 23,320 cm-’ _ The sphttmg between the two htghest bdnds comcrdes wtth v(Fe-0) reported for these compounds by two groups of workers 43V45 The cychc ureas, ethylene urea (EU) and propylene (PU) form complexes 4G FeC13-2EU and FeC13 -2PU whtch may be of the type [FeLJCI,]‘FeCIZr Fe(urea),Xs
(L) Sulplloxlcles Most of the work has been concerned with dtmethylsulphoxtde (DMSO),Cotton and Francrs reported47 the yellow Fe(C104)s 6DMS0, red-brown FeBra 6DMS0, and FeC13 ‘?DMSO (yellow) FeC13 4DMSO (which IS converted mto FeC13 2DMSO at 50” C) was reported at thts time4’ whtist Fe(N03)3 6DMS0 has been prepared more recently49 The 2 1 ferric chloride complex has been shown So to possess the structure fratzs[Fe(DMS’3)4C12]‘FeC14. The hexacoordtnate chromophore possesses approximately 041, assigned the far-JR spectrum of Fe(DMS0j2C1a on local symmetry_ Johnson and Walton” the basis of a pentacoordmate structure, correctly, they assigned the bands at 463 and 290 cm’ to v(Fe-0) and v(Fe-Cl) respectively, but ignored ~3 of FeCli at 377 cm-’ A more whtlst EPR recent study of DMSO complexes has confirmed43 the asstgnment of Y(Fc-0) spectra have shown that the hexakls-DMSO Fe3+ Ions are shghtly dlstorted from effectwe O,, symmetry,
m accordance
with the predlctlons of Berney and Weber**
of ferric chloride with tetrahydrothlophen
been prepared, Coord
oxide 53 and dlphenylsulphoxlde
these are thought to possess stmtlar structures
Chern Rev,
8 (1972)
2 1 complexes 54 have also
to the DMSO dnalogue
S A COTTON
194
(d) @ndrue
.V-mrdes
A number of complexes
Fe(py0)6(C10,1)3
of pyridme N-oxide Itself have been prepared, the first bemg where IR spectra and conductance results ” + indicated the formula
bemg assrgned at 385 cm’ m the far-IR Fe(pyO),& [Fe(pyO), I 3+ ((3% 13, v(Fe-O) was first reported at about the same time 57. this complex affords an example of how an Incorrect structure can be asstgned on the basrs of mcomplete data Purely upon the basts of cryoscopic me,tsurements, a monomerrc, pentacoordmate structure was assrgned Later workers ” suggested the fonnulatron [Fe(pyO)? Cl2 ] +Cl-. based upon an incorrect mterpretatton of the far-IR spectrum As a result of exammmg the far-IR,Raman, and electromc mm- [Fe(pyO),Cl,] ‘(FeC14)-, slmllar spectra, most recent work 59 assigned tt the structure to that adopted by Fe(DMS0)2 Cl3 (ref 50) This evrdence was supported wrth the observatton that the complex is d 1 1 electrolyte m mtrobenzene and that, on treatment wth methanohc hthmm perchlorate, a complex [Fe(pyO),,C12]+ ClOi-HZ0 was formed The ferric bromide complex Fe(pyO)* Br3 was also prepared whilst a monomeric chloro complex Fe(pyO),CIJ could Jso be tsolated from ethereal solutton Fe(py0)3(NCS)3 was first reported sltghtly earl.er 6o and two nitrate complexes, Fe(pyO)B( NO3 )3 *2H2 0 and Fe(py0)4(N03)3 *HZ 0 have been made i9 The latter IS belteved to contam two mono-
dent&e nitrate groups Conbwtent rtsslgnment of v(Fe-0)
can be made ” to infrared bands m the region 320-
350 cm-‘. but the non-observatron of Raman bands asstgnable to v,,(Fe-0) m the hex&s-(py0) complexes has led to the suggestion that the [Fe(pyO),] 3+ ton IS very dtstorted, J theory supported by the observatton of a strong signal wtth getf ca 4 3 m the Xband EPR spectra of the 6 1 nitrate dnd penhlorate complexes The spin-HamIltomdn parameters D = 0.36 cm- _ h = 0 233 have been awgned to the [Fe(pyO),] 3+ Ion m the perchlorate
complex
59
A series of complexes of the type [FeC4-RC, HqNO)6] (C104)3 have been studred 6’ (R = OMe. Me, H, Cl, or NO, ), Y(Fe-0) being dsslgned to bands ca 400 cm-’ m the IR, &tTvalues lay m the range 5 97 - 6 07 B M (e) Anudes and related Iigands Drmethylformamtde (DMF) readtly complexes wrth rron(IlI), EPR and vrbrdtronal studies on Fe(DMF)6(C104)3 imply 43 that the complex IS structurally very srmdar to the I I dmrethylsulphoxtde analogues The hgand phenazone (pn) (PhN*CO-CH C(Me)N-Me) coordmates VU d carbonyl oxygen, and complexes Fe(pn)6(C’104)3, [Fe(pn)6] 3+ (FeX.& (X = Cl, Br) and Fe(pn)s(NCS)s are known 62 Far-IR Raman, and EPR support these structures 43 Yet another example of a complex contammg a FeL? Fe(HMPA)6(C104)3 (HMPA = hexamethylphosphoramrde OP(NMe2)3), reported IS 6 25 B M , whrch seems Donoghue and Drago 63, the reported magn etrc moment
results ion 1s
by rather
htgh The hexakts complex of trtmethylphosphate wtth ferric perchlorate has ,u,ft = 6 04 B M , and IS a 1 3 electrol) te in mtrobenzene 64. electromc spectral measurements imply that this hexacoordlnate species 1s also present m solutton Wtth N,iV-dunethylacetamlde
COORDINATlON
CHEMISTRY
(DMA) the complexes formed
195
OI- IRON(III)
Fe(DMA)6 (C104)3, Fe(DMA)2 Cl3 and Fe(DMAJ2 Cl3 - 2H2 0 are chloride complex IS a 1 1 electrolyte m DMA dnd thus IS prob.!-
65, the anhydrous
bly [Fe(DhlA)+Clz]+FeC1~
e-Caproiactam
(HNm=O)
Fe(Laprolacta!n)6(CIOa)3 dnd Fe(caprolactam)2C13 electrolytes !n nltromethdne and thus are probably (FeC14C12)+(FeCi4)
forms complexes66
which are. respeLt!vely. I 3 and I- I of the usual (FeL6)‘+(C10;)3 and
types
(j)Pf~ospfm~cand arsule oxides Conlpared to the l!gands discussed earlier, where SIX ligdnd molecules can coordinate to the metal ion, dt nlost only four phosphrne ox!de l!gands cdn coordmate to the ferric Ion Fe(Ph3P0)4(C104)3 was first prepared from alcohol!c soiut!on by Bann!ster dnd COttOn6’ from benzene solution 68 Fe(Ph3AsO),(C10q)3 whrlst Fe(Ph3 POj2 Cl3 was later prepared was or!g!nally prepared by d shghtly more !nd!rect method frotn ferric nitrate sod!um perchlorate and tr!pbenyldrs!ne oxide !n ethanol 69 although !t may be prepared by the direct react!on of ferric perchlorate and the l!gand 7fl Fe(Ph3 AsO)* Cl3 WJS prepared s!m!iar react!on to that utd!sed for the Ph3P0 dnalogue Pb!lhps and Tyree suggested that
the trlphenyl
and
[Fe(Ph3AsO)jC12]+FeCl~,
dence
arsme
oxide
‘O m the IR spectra
coOr&nattOn,
but In
complexes
should
be formulated
ds d result of conduct.mce
Fe(Burz3P0)4(C10~)3,
[Fe(Ph3As0)4r*(C104)a
!neasure!nents
of erther of the above perLhIorate
two perLh!orate
by cl 69
There
complexes
groups
IS no evi-
for perchlordte
are thought
to coordl-
nate 7! This reflects the lessened ster!L effect of Iz-dll\yl Lompared with phenql groups Far-IR asslgnrnents were v(Fe-OPBu”3) at 410 cm-’ and v(Fe-0CI03) at 315 ~ni’ Further studies of the tr!phenyl phosphine Jnd ars!ne ov!de systenis have been made 7o utlhsmg Raman IR dnd EPR spectroscopy !n re-euam!n!ng the perchlorate and recently chloride complexes. and !n character!s!ng the complexes FeL2 Br3 FeL2(N03 )3 a!!d complexes gave the (gl = 6. g,, = 3) type of EPR Fe(Ph3 PO), (NCS)3 Th e p erchlorate spectrum and were thus assigned square-planar rather thdn tetrahedral structures Fo! the D = phosphlne oxide complex. D = 0 84 cm-’ , h = 0 005 and for the arserlc analogue,
1 05 cm-’ h = 0 IR ddta md!cated
thdt the nitrate
Lompleucs
d!d not tontdin
‘!on!c
nitrate groups, and the EPR results suggested a tngonal-b!pyram!dal structure w!th monodentdte nitrates (D3~1) At the X-band, the EPR s!gnals were of the Cgl = 6.g,, = 2) type with a sl!gbt spI!tt!ng !n the g = 6 resonance this wds interpreted m terms of the signal re-
flecting the overall rather than the local symmetry
The D values are Cd_ 0 6 cni’
and X value
the D values ca 0 05 Fe(Ph3 PO)2 (NCS)3 wds thought to hdve d s!!i!!ldr structure of 0 07 cni-’ compared to 0 5.5 cni’ for the nitrate dnalogue shows th,!t the trrgondl tortion IS quite small here reflecting the s!!n!lar Dq values that NCS The halide complexes ev!dently possess the rrarls-[Fe(Ph3RO)JX-,
d!5-
and PhsPO create 1’ (FeX;) structure
the character!st!c v!brat!onnl fund,!mentals ot the FeX; ions were noted m both the tk-IR and Raman spectra and the EPR spectra evh!b!ted (get* = 2) resonances from the t-eX,, Ions and (gL = 6) resonances [Fe(Ph3R0)4X,]+,forR=P,X=C1
from the hexdcoordlnate chromophores in the ions the!!D=O63,X=OOl .mdforX=Br,D=
cm~‘,X=0.forR=As,X=Ci,D=O55c!ii~’.h=O01 Coord
Chem Rev.
8 (1972)
dndforX=Br.D-~.50cnl-‘=O
I90
196
S A COTTON
A!though v(Fe-0) spectra
may be assrgned to a band of medium-to-strong
of the arsine oxide complexes
m the region 400-435
cm-‘,
intensity m the IR no such consistent
as-
stgnment is possible for the phosphme oxide complexes_ Thus IS a good example of the lmutations of far-IR spectroscopy as a stereochemrcal tool It would be interesting to study the effects of small alkyl groups, unlike Fe(pyO)sCIs (ref 59) no complex Fe(PhsPO)sCls can be prepared ‘O, it appears, however, that alkyl substrtuents are less stereochemtcally demanding than phenyl groups’l (g) Mix ellarrems FeC13-ttz 0 and related systems were prepared many years ago * but httle IS known about them.
1 1 adducts
of ferric chloride
with benzophenone
and acetophenone
are known ’
whilst with benzanhrone,
C1,HloO, FeX3 benzathrone complexes (X = Cl, Br) have been values bemg 5.73 B M (X = Cl) and 6 02 B M. (X = Br) The dark brown ethoxtde Fe(OEt)s has been prepared from FeCls and NaOEt m ethanol ’ or from ferric chlorrde m ether-benzene on treatment with excess ammonia 76 Fe(Ohfe)3 IS also known The magnetic properties of these systems, which are hrgh-spur wtth abnormally large Curtc-Weiss constants. have been Interpreted “*” m terms of a trmuclear reported
7’ , petI
structure
mvolvmg
The alcoholates
Fe04
tetrahedra.
FeC13 *2ROH
(R = Me, Et, Pr”, Pr’, Bu”, Bul) have been reported
they are prepared from ferric chlorrde and the appropriate (II) BP and ter-dentate
“,“,
alcohol m benzene
hgands
Iron(III) forms three complexes with acetylacetone (acac), of whrch Fe(acac)s IS the best known It IS readily prepared as red crystals by the reaction of aqueous ferrtc chlortde wtth urea and excess acetylacetone The crystal structure “shows that the ferric Ion IS at the centre of a nearly perfect octahedron of oxygen atoms The ferric tris(tropolonate) complex, Fe(C, Hs O2 )s contains a much more distorted octahedron “, as one might expect from the more rrgrd nature of the hgand Smgle-crystal magnetrc susceptrbrhty measurements 83 on Fe(acac)s have determmed D to be -0 11 2 0 01 cm* whilst v(Fe-0) has been asstgned to far-IR bands at 434 and 300 cm-’ wrth the ard of metal Isotope substrtutron s4 q8’ Smgle-crystal electromc spectra have also been reported 86 Fe(acac)2 Cl and Fe(acac)Cls can be prepared either by refluxmg the appropriate quantities of FeCls and acac m benzene “, or by reaction of the stotchtometrtc amounts of FeCl, and Fe(acac)j _ Fe(acac), Cl has been shown 88 to possess a shghtly drstorted squarepyramtdal structure, with the Fe atom raised 0 51 A above the basal plane. The Mossbauer parameters are ” 6 = 0 60 mm see-r and AE = 1 mm set-’ , for Fe(acac)Cla , AE is go 0.44 mm set-’ Fowles et al. ” have reported camp lexes of 1,4-dtoxan which mclude Fe& -droxan, thus may have a polymeric structure mvolvmg bridging droxans and hence pentacoordmate
COORDINATION
ferric iron
d-d
197
CHEMISTRY OF IRON(II1)
bands
occur at 12.0, 15.2, 17.1, 19.0, 24-6,30-O,
cm-’ , it IS. however, not improbable that the structure is cause of the richness of d-d bands and also since Y(Fe-Cl) 1s htgh for Y(Fe-Cl) m a five-coordmate environment report ‘* concerned thus compound and two others, (droxan)3 -HCl, which are not well defined
More recently,
37 0 and 45.0 (x 103)
[Fe(droxan)~Cl~]‘(FeCl4)- beat 380 cni',whrch
was noted
but Lorrect for (FeC14)-. An earlter FeC!3(droxan)2
-2H2 0 and Fe&
(CaHlo02)
the 1 1 complex of ferric chlorrde with dlmethoxyethane
was reported Q3, this possibly involves pentacoordmate
rron(III), v(Fe-Cl) occurrmg at 1 I-0, 14 4,23
at 355 and 375 cm-’ and d-d bands 36.0 (x 103) cm-‘. Walmsley and Tyree 94 have mvestrgated some complexes to bands
formed
-
being
assigned
0,28.4,3
wrth liquids
1 5 and of the type
R = Bu” (Lr
) or Pr”O (L2)) preparmg [Fe(Lr )s] 3+(FeCl,I)s, 413 and [Fe(L2)* Cl2 ]+(FeCI,)- all of wh;ch have pcff values of ca. 6 1 PW-~)S13+(C10
R2 PO*CHa .PORa
(where
B.M at ambrent temperatures_ A related complex, [Fe(OMPA)3] 3f(FeC1;)3 (OMPA = octamethylpyrophosphoramide, (Me2 N), 0POPO(NMe2 )2) was reported by Joesten and Nykerk who found rt to be a 1 3 electrolyte m mtrobenzene 95 They report peff to be 12 8 B M., evidently
this 1s not pet- per Fe, which would
h&r_ The complex 1_c,~=6 13 BM
[Fe(btpyOz)s] (C104)s *3H2 0 (brpyO? at room temperature Q6 whilst v(Fe-0)
bands at 408 and 377 cm-’ 2,2’,2”-Terpyrrdme-l.l’,l”-trroxrde have prepared hrgh-spur complex
seem to be 6 4 B-M , which
the complexes
Because should
(terpy03) Fe(terpy03)C13
of the stereochemical
adopt
the mertdronal
= 2,2’-brpyrtdyl-2,2’-droxrde) has has been assrgned ” to far-IR
IS a terdentate
hgand.
and Fe(terpy03)2(C104)3,
requuements
IS strll very
of the hgand,
Rerff and Baker9’ which
are both
the ferric chloride
configuration
(m) Mcxed 0.N dorzors
Some of the most mterestmg
complexes
of this kmd of donor
ethylenebrs(sahcylrdenermmato)) and related hgands, by Pferffer and Tsumakr 99 Two forms of Fe(salen)Cl
are formed
by salen (N.N’-
the first examples being prepared have been xsolated, one being mono-
meric and having a molecule of mtromethane m the lattrce ‘00 whrlst the other 1s drmerrc lo1 _ The monomers follow Curie-Weiss behavlour, with peff values of 5.7-6 0 B M at 300°K and 0 values of 2-6O whilst the drmers have moments whrch drop from 5.1-5 4 B-M. at 300°K to 3.6-3.9 I3 M at 77°K (ref. 102) The latter results have been interpreted m terms of a bmuclear spm-free rron(II1) model, with J values of 6 5 -8 cm-’ Mossbauer spectra have been recorded for a number of these systems ‘03. as a result of this, certam reclassrfrcatrons were suggested. The pentacoordmate monomers generally give smaller Isomer shafts than the drmers, as one might expect More recently, adducts of the type Fe(saIen)*RCOz have been
studled lW, these exhibrted slmllar magnetic behaviour to the other systems, so it appears that both monomers and dlmers ex!st here too Coord Chem Rev
8 (L972)
S
198
A COTTON
Further examples of complexes mvolvmg 0-N donors are provided by complexes of IIf-substituted sahcyldldmunes (salHNR) whrch grve complexes FeC&(salNHR), (probably Fe(salNR)3 and Fe(salNR)2 X (X = Cl, five-coordmate [FeCl(salHNRj~ I “Cl;), octahedral Br) whrch may be dlso five-coordmate xylphenyl) sahcylaldrmme 5.0 + 0 05 B M at 29S°K,
‘OS The terdentate
bgand
derived
from N-(Z-hydro-
(LH,) gives complexes FeLX (X = CI, Br) wrth ~,t, values of so that they are probably drmertc ‘06 On refluxmg these m
pyrrdme, complexes FeLX(py)J are obtamed, which have ‘normal’ moments of 6 0 f 0 05 B-M. and are thus probably monomers, wrth one mole of lattice pyrrdme N,~.Dm~ethylethylenedn.tmme N-oxrde grves a rather unstable brown complex lo’, Fe(Me2 NO-CM2 -CH2 -NH2 )3(CIOd)3, which IS d 1 3 electrolyte and has flUerr= 5 80 B M , the hgand
IS presumably
brdentate
(IV) Acids One of the consprcuous ammo
dcrd complexes,
gaps m our knowledge
constdermg
of coor$inatron
the importance
too bttle attentron has been paid to then metal carboxylic dnd ammo actds m thus sectron
of ammo
complexes
compounds
concerns
acids m brologtcal We drscuss complexes
systems, of both
(a) Car3uxyktes Generally, rron(III), hke chromium(IlI), does not form monomerrc carboxyldtes, rnstead, specres based on a trtangular Fe30 chromophore are formed The magnehsm of a number of these systems has been mvestrgeted in both the solid state and solutron lo*, and interpreted m terms of antrferromagnettc behavrour A complex [Fe(en)(OHj2 (PhC02 )] has been Isolated ‘09 dnd the magnetrc behavrour on the bdsls of a spm-equd~brnrm The com%a296 = 2 74 B-M.; p;;r = 2 32 B M ) interpreted plex may not be monomeric, however The red crystallrne FeCI(MeC02 )2 IS reported to be formed from the reactron of anhydrous Fe& wrth anhydrous acettc actd, the dark brown bromide dnalogue FeCI(HCO,), 312 H20). Are these monomers9 By extractmg a mrxture of Fe(MeCO,), and [Fes(MeC02)80H]
IS known,
as IS rl’
w~tb acetrc acrd ‘I’, a
dark compound Fe2(MeC02)5 was obtamed, thus 1s presumably dtmeric Starke ‘12 has reported that reactron of forrmc or acetrc acid with non, in methanol m the presence of oxygen, produces species Fe(RC02)(OMe), However, more simple complexes are formed with oxalate and related Ions M3Fe(oxalate)3 lnHz 0 (M = Lr, Na, 22 = 0, M = K, t2 = 3) are typical. The structure of the potassmm salt has been determned ‘I3 : the stx oxygen atoms coordinated to the non atom form an approxrmate!y octahedral array, the O-Fe-O angles averaging ca 85” Smgle-crystal magnetic susceptrbrhty measurements have determined D. the zero-field splitting parameter, to be -0 55 cm’, reflecting the strong tngonal field 83 _ Lrttle mvestigatron seems to hdVe 5H20 where interestmg possrbrhbeen made of complexes 1I4 of the type Fe(D-tartrate), ties arrse.
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
199
OF IRON~III)
(b) Anmo acid complexes The amino acid DL-metionine [MeS(CH2)2 CH(NHI)C02 H] forms a tns-complex with occrlrs via the iron(III) having peff = 5 63 B M , it was suggested ‘I5 that coordmation amine and carboxylate functions More recently, It has been found that react:on between Fe3+ and L-cysteine m alcohol gives labde red, blue, and violet co‘nplexes ‘I6 _ The violet *2H2 0, It is uut:ally produced at -78” as a green complex was found to be Fe(cysteme)a
complex which changes lrreverslbly mto the purple complex on raising the temperature. Electromc spectral, ORD and CD measurements Indicated the blue species to be a 1 1 complex, the red species to be a 1 2 complex and the violet species I-3, all rnvolvmg S,Ocoordmatlon. It was suggested that the unstable green complex 1s an isomer of the violet tris-complex, havmg S,N-coordinatton Rdder and Bayer have reported Ii7 the EPR specrrum of an tron(III)-cysteme complex of unspecified compontton, havmggl = 2.33, gll = 1.94; evidently it 1s an (S = l/2) species, involvmg conslderable axial dlstortlon Iron salts give a deep purple colour with thloglycolhc acid m ammoniacal solution; no stable iron(llI) complex exists, but the species present 1s thought to contam iron “* EPR measurements on frozen solutions might be of value here (c) Cow~pkxes of EDT,!
only ferric
and related lrgarlds
Two types of EDTA coordmatlon have been discovered by X-ray dlffractlon studies, m the complexes Rb [Fe(EDTA)H2 0] *Hz 0 and Lt [Fe(EDTA)H* 0] l2Hz 0, ferric tons are surrounded by a hexadentate EDTA molecule and a water molecule, m Whdt may be regarded as a distorted penTagonal-blpyramldal configuration ‘I9 In Fe(HEDTA)-Hz 0, one carboxyhc group 1s protonated, and thus does not coordmate, so that the ethylenedtammetetraacetlc actd group IS pentddentate, 3 water molecule completes the distorted octahedral coordmation of the metal Izo The EPR spectrum of Fe(HEDTA)*H*O, doped into the isostructural Ga analogue, has m terms of the parameters been investigated “I , at 1 lOoK, the spectra were interpreted D=O69cK’,h=0.267( on coohng further, h appears to increase) The EPR of Fe3* doped into a NH,‘[Co(EDTA)*H,O] host has been reported I** and interpreted 123 m terms of the parameters
D = 0 769 cm-‘, X = 0.307.
-xH20 (0
-
as m the EDTA analogue. OF NITROGEN-DONOR
LICANDS
(I) Monodentate (a) Thiocyanate and cyanate Reaction of Fe(NCS)s and alkylammomum coord_ Chern.Rev, 8 (1972)
thlocyanates
m alcohol leads to the formatIon
S A COTTON
200
of the hexakrs
salts (R4N*)3 [Fe(NCS)6]
‘-
In the e]ectromL
spectrum
of the tetramethyl-
bands are noted at 10,640 cm-’ and 17,500 cnri’ , most of the specby the usual Fe-NCS charge-transfer absorption 126 Far-IR absorpt.ons assrgnabie to V(Fe-NCS) were noted r2’ at 298sh, 272 and 233 cm’, m the ethyl at 370 cxti'and G(Fe-NCS) at 98 cm’ iron(III)analogue, others 128 assign u(Fe-NCS) throcyanate complexes are all probably IV-bonded, the occurrence of a medium mtensrty
ammonium salt, d-d trum bemg obscured
band at ca 470 cm-’
m the IR being regarded
(Ph4As)“[Fe(NCO)s]
has been prepared
as dragnostrc
of thus 129_
from AgNCO and Fe&
m acetone
13’,
v(Fe-b CO) was assigned to a far-JR band at 4 10 cm-’ The coordmatron rs presumably terrhedrdl and thus rt IS likely to be N-bonded The h&-spur complex [Fe(N3)5 ] ‘- has been reported,
the structure
of the tetraphenylarsomum
salt shows the ferrrc ron to have
nedr-Da/, local symmetry Equatorral Fe-N distances, at 1 963-l 971 8, are shorter the axial Fe-N distance 261 , presumably due to &and-hgand repulston fb) Attitttottta No simple complexes merely
exist m aquous
solution,
dddition
of ammonia
to ferric
than
Salts
precipitating
the hydrous oxide However, treatment of anhydrous ferrrc chloride r3? wrth ammonia gas produces the very hygroscoprc, unstable comdnd ferric bromrde plexes FeCla -6NH3 and FeBrs -6NH3, about whrch very little IS known
A larger number of basic complexes have been Isolated. as well as species of the type (pyH)+(Fe&)and (pyW)s(Fe2 C19)3- (refs 133, 134) The ldtter complexes have all been shown I35 to contain FeC& 1011s On the other hand, some genume pyrrdme complexes have been made Fe(py),(NCS)s crystdls from alcohohc solution fdr-IR assrgnments ofv(Fe-NCS)
and Fe(qumohne)s(NCS)s were prepared as rrrdescent of the pyrrdme complex 13’ led to 136 A remvestrgdtron at 300 cm’ and v(Fe-py) at 249 cm-‘, the paucity of
far-IR bands suggests that this 1s the Jzc-isomer The complex Fe(py),C13 was also prepared by refrrgeratmg a drlute solutron of anhydrous ferric chlonde In pyrxdme 133Y*34. it forms very hygroscoplc red crystals A more recent investrgatron I38 suggests that rt rsfac-Fe(py)3C1s spy, the spur Hamrltoman parameters are D N 0 164 cm-‘. h = 0 100 whilst v(Fe-Cl) is dssigned to 300 and 250 cm-’ and v(Fe-N)
at 333 and cd 200 cm-’
Whrlst no characterrsable
product
could
be obtained
from the reactron of FeBrs and pyrrdme, the parameters D = 0 665 cm-‘, X = 0 033 were obtained from In(Fe)pysBr3 rmplymg afac structure Spectrophotometrrc studies of FeC13 m pyrrdme I39 suggest that three specres are present, FeCI;, an uncharged species [Fe(py),,Cls] and a metastable species of IOW Cl- Fe” ratio, possibly [Fe(py),& ]+
(d)Pyrazoles In an early study I40 of the complexmg ability of pyrazole, a complex Fe(pyrazole)4Cls was reported It was claimed, purely on the basrs of halogen analysis, that this was the correct formula for a complex which could not, however, be obtained m a pure state More r3’ has shown that thrs IS m fact Fe(pyrazole)3C13. EPR spectra (D = recent investigation
13’
COORDINATION
0 24 cm’,
CHCXIISTRY
201
Oi- IRON(II1)
h = 0 13). far-IR and Raman
results
imply
it IS m fact thejac-isomer.
A similar
complex Fe(3-methylpyrazole)3C13 may be Isolated. this ha> more Raman and far-IR bdnds than the pyrazole analogue, and m view of the EPR data (D cd 0.90 cn-’ , X = 0 3 I), d meridional
polydentate,
structure
wds assigned
the complex
dme)z Cl3 IS probably
The hgdnds pyrazme
Fe(pyrazme)s,2C13
a polymer
IS thought
dnd pyrimidme to be dmlen
are potentially *, whilst
Fe(pyrmn-
I38
This compound exhibits a number of interesting features, first prcpdred by Burger and Wannagat *‘I. the crystal structure shows that the Iron atom IS three-coordinate 14’ - The FeN3 and FeNSi units are pl,mdr, and the symmetry of the environment of the iron atom may be regarded as 031~) although the molecule hds only D3 symmetry overdll A prelnnmary study of the magnetlL dnd speLtros_opic properties of this complex showed that it obeyed the Cune-Weiss Idw to liquid nitrogen B-M _0 = - 10”) The Isomer shrft m the Mossbauer spectrum
temperatures (.u,~~ = 5 9 1 IS of the order expected for
a tercoordmate Fe3’ Ion (6 = 0 43 mm seL’ relative to nltroprusslde) but the quJdrupole splitting is extremely large (~Lz = 5 12 mm set-’ ) and this hds not yet been explamed The EPR spectra at X-bdnd (9 3 GHz) and Q-band (36 0 GHt) were interpreted m terms of the parameters D = 1 00 cm-‘. X = 0 Crystal field calculations m D3/, symmetry afford the d orbttal sequeme e’ +I 2370, cz’ -6980. err -8800 ‘m-l _ unplymg strong Interaction m the _u_lplane ‘43 (II) Bdettrate
(atrd other) hgatxis
Much preparative work has beep carried out with the llgdnds 1.10.phendnthrolme (phen) dnd 2,2’-blpyndfl (blpy) Addltlon of these hgands to aqueous solutions of ferric salts leads to the formdtlon
of brown hydroxy-brtdged dmers of the type ‘~4 If the tris-complexes of Fe” dre first prep,tred, [(phen )Z Fe(QH)z Fe(phen)z 1 4+ However they can be smoothly oxrdlsed to the blue [Fe(phen)J] ‘+ dnd [Fe(blpy),] 3+ complex ions “’ These systems are low-spm the magnetic moments ‘4611’7, hlossbauer parameters I’9 Is8 I50 (Table 1) have been obtamed F~ggls 146 Interprets the vana(Table 2) and-EPR spectra tion of magnetic
susceptlblhty
with temperature
m terms of dn axial field of ca #JO-600
cm-’ On the other hand, the EPR spectra are interpreted Iso m terms of a dtstortlon of SOO- I200 cni’ and postulate an E ground term. m contradlctron to the inferences of Ftgg~s The hmltatlons of the simple crystal field approach IS revealed by the rnagmtude ofk, the orbital reduction factor cdculated. 0 93-I 07 this results from the neglect uf factors such as configuratlon mteractlon ] ‘CIO; expected to be Other Iow-spm systems 14’ are of the type [Fe(bipy)2(CN), CIS (C,, ), which exhtblt a quadrupole sphttmg m the Mossbduer spectrum comparable to results have also been reported 14’. pcff values that of the tns-complex “’ Susceptibility of 2 40-2 00 B M were noted over the range 3,95--79°K and were interpreted in terms of a low-symmetry field of ~3: 500 cm-’ dnd a k value of 0 9-l 0 EPR results would be Coord
Chem Rev
8 (1972)
202
S A CO-ITON
welcome
Reaction of ferric chloride in ddute HCI wth phenanthrohne Bves 14’ a complex Fe, phen,Cl, whdst slmllar reactions in acetic acid lead “’ to Fe, phen, Cl6 iMeCO* H. This latter complex IS part of a series [Fe(phen)* Cl, ]‘X- nMeCOp H (X = C104, n = 1, X = as Cl, n = 2, X = FeC!&, n = 0.5). A complex Fe(phen)CfS was orlgmally Is2 formulated l
[Fe(phen)* Cl,, 1’ [FeC14 ] - as it gave a perchlorate [Fe(phen)z Cl2 ]'ClO; . Later studies 14’ indicated that this comp!ex (whrch could be Isolated m two crystalline modlficatrons) :s probably a chloro-bndged dlmer Fel(phen)3Cld is thought to be [Fe(phen)* Cl2 ]+[Fe(phen)C14] -; on treatment with methanohc LlC104, [Fe(phen)* Cl2 ]+ClO< IS obtained, whdst reaction with tetraethylammomum chloride yields [Et4N]+[Fe(phen)C14], which can also be prepared directly from (Et4N)+(FeC14)and phen m acetone. Clearly more work on these systems 1s desirable. Fe(en)3C13 has been prepared by direct reaction in absolute alcohol ls3, It IS low-spm, 2s might be expected
If the ethylenedrammes
are chelating.
The electromc
spectrum
was
anaiysed in terms of the parameters B = 500, C = 2000, Dq = 1950 cm-’ , B IS reduced to about 50% of the free ion value 2-(2’-Pyrldyl)umdazole (pyimH) and 2-(2’-pyndyl)benzirmdazole (pybelmH) form lowspin tris-complexes Is4 Fe(pylmH)3(C104)3 and Fe(pybelmH)3C13 as well as an ‘inner’ complex Fe(pyrm)3 m&H20 Two terpyrldyl
complexes
have been reported
as m the case of the analogous from the Iron(U) complex. thought to be Is6 One class of complexes
phenanthrohne
The chloride which IS rather
Is5 , Fe(terpy)C13 and Fe(terpy)* (ClO,), , complex, the perchlorate had to be prepared
complex
should
hard to classlty
be merrdlonal, is the rsocyamde
as InC13-terpy complexes
IS re-
ported over 60 years ago Is’. FeC13_2EtNC, FeC13*3EtNC and FeC13 -3PhNC were obtamed tmtlally ds 011s from ether, eventually yellow crystals were obtamed. No further work seems to have been reported on these complexes A rather exotic example of a ferric complex with only mtrogen-donor hgands IS a heptacoordinate complex whose structure has been reported by Flelscher and HawkInson Is’, a pentadentate macrocycle and two N-bonded thlocyanates make up the coordmatlon sphere, where Fe-N(macro) = 2 23 + 0 05 A and Fe-NCS = 2.01 f 0 02 A. This IS one of a series of complexes
form [FeBX*] ‘Y-, where B = 2,13-dimethyl-3, octadeca-1(18)2,12,14,16-pentaene, where X= Cl, Br,
160 which are of the general
6,9,12,18-penta-azablcyclo[12,3,1]
I or NCS, and Y = C104, BF4 or NCS They are S = 5/2 systems whrch are 1: 1 electrolytes - of especial interest IS the Felxl--I linkage, one of the few known Further study of this type of system would be mterestmg E COMPLEXES Ol- HALIDES
The specres considered m this sectron are those which contain only hahde ions coordlnated to iron(IlI), other ferric hahde complexes are discussed in other sections, especrally m sect. C
COORDINATION CHEhIISTRY OF IRON(II1)
203
t TABLE 2 iMossbauer parameters and magnenc moments a Temp
6 (mm set’)
Fe(phen)3(ClO4)3.3H20
80 80 300
1 e(bqw)3(C104)3-3HzO IFe(bw)tCCN)2
ICI04
jTe(phen)t(CN)2
I Cl04
0 36 0 32 0 24
AE b (mm scf_Ti)
171 1 80 I 63
I;ge% )’ 2 40 240 2 34 (294) 2 01 (81) 2 42 (300) 2 03 (80)
[Te(phen)zClz j+[Fe(phen)C14 j[Et4Nj+[Fe(phen)Ci4]-
80
0 63 065
0 05
80
0 05
5 57
[Te(phen)K12
80
06.5
0 05
5 91
77
040
1 36
fe( en)
j+ClO4-
3C13
2 45 (285) i 17 (80)
Te( terp) K13
80
ca 071
0 54
5 85
Fe( terpy)2(C10&
80
c3 033
343
2 16 (286) 191 (78)
Fe(pyimHMClO&
2 47 (295)
l-.e(p)un)s-*H20
2 52 (295)
d Data from rets 146, 148, 149. 151, 153 and 158 b Relative to sodium mtroprusslde ’ At ca 300%
unless otherwsc
stated
The tetrachloroferrate ion occurs nature of the Ion has been confirmed
m a number of complexes; the essentially tetrahedral by crystallographic mvestlgatlon, although lt 1s usually
shghtly dlstorted In (Ph4As)“(FeC14)‘the Cl-Fe-Cl angles are 16’ 107” and 1 14.5” whdst m [Fe(DMS0)4C12 ] ‘(FeCl.+)- they are 162 108.2” and 112 2”. Similar values have been reported for Na’FeC14- (ref 163) and (PC14)+(FeC14)- (ref lG4) Mcissbauer studies have also been made ‘35-“‘, reported isomer shifts are 0.45 mm set-’ for (FeCL)- and 0 5 I mm set -1
for (FeBr4)- Gmsberg and Robm 13’ showed that salts of the type (pyH+)s(Fe2 C19)3- are m fact composed of (FeC14)- ions, but they did prove that one form of Cs3 Fe2 Cl9 fact contam dlmerlc (Fe,C19)3- units The assignments of the d-d bands m the electronic spectrum of the tetrahaloferrate Ions IS still the subject of uncertainty as fine structure has been found at low temperatures 13’ unsuspected by others ‘M The mixed tetrahaloferrate ions also exist, FeC13 Br- and FeBr3C1- were prepared by Kraus and Heldlberg 37 and reexamined by Clausen and Good ‘67 who treated an alcoholic solution of the appropriate ferric halide with a tetraalkylammoruum hahde. FeC12 Brz- has also been Isolated 167 from bromine oxidation of alcoholic FeCl, , followed by addition of Coord
CIIem Rev,
8 (1972)
S A COTTON
104
TABLF 3 Vlbratiozul IundsrnentJls I65 for reCI;
raq
I-eBrj-
"1
330
700
"2
114 378 137
785 95
“3 v4
and FeBrq- (In cm-‘)
the Jkylammomum h&de The Mossbauer spectra 16’ show a gradual Increase m isomer shift as chlor’de IS replaced by bromide. no quadrupole sphttmg wds seen The far-IR spectra showed v(Fe-Cl) ‘n the region 350-390 cm-’ and Y(Fe-Br) ‘n the reg’on 260-300 cm-‘, J number of unass’gndbfe bands were, however, noted Fundamentals for Fet&- and FeBraare tabulated “’ ‘n Table 3 No <‘nlomc pentachlorldes
or bromides
h,jve been reported
but some pentafluortdes
known In the ease of mdmm(IlI) both InC14- and I&l:can be obtained, depend’ng t!le cho’ce of cond’t’ons (espeL’ally solvent), so that ‘t IS poss’ble that the unsolvated
are upon FeClg-
ion mtghht be obtamed In contrast, the stable dn’on’c spec’es for fluor’de IO’I IS 4’ FeFz-, v(Fe-F) has been asslgned m the 450-500 cm-’ m the IR ‘69,‘70 A number of tetra- and penta-fluor’des have been prepdred, but these are probably LI, Na) have pett values of 5 SO-S.95 have moments
of ca 4 8 B M (ref
polymers with fluor’de bndges, M3 FeFs B M at room temperature whilst CsFeF4
171) These ‘low’ moments
may reflect
(M = NH4, and K2 FeFs
antlferromagnetlc
mteractlon via br’dgmg fiuurmes. On heatmg (NH4)3 FeF6 to 140°C, NH4 FeF4 IS formed A detailed study IT3 of M, FeF, systems (M = LI, Na. K, Rb, Cs, Ag, T1 and NH4) showed that they contamed FeFz- octahedra, having Curre-Weiss magnetic behavlour to hquld
“*
mtrogen temperature v(Fe-F) was assigned at 450-500 cm-’ and G(F-Fe-F) at 270350 ‘In-’ m the fdr-IR A reLent EPR study ” has been made of the FeFz- ‘on m aqueous solution showmg the strength of fluor’de Loordmatlon to iron, the expected seven-hne spectrum was obtamed, Lharactensed by g,, = 2 0036 and aF ca 23 0 gauss it IS evident from the value of the isomer shift (0 69-O 71 mm set-’ ) m the Mossbauer but it was not spectra ‘35*‘65 of FeC13 and FeBr3 that the ferric ‘on IS hexacoordmate, It IS preclp’tated from sountil recently that the FeCIz- ‘on was isolated and charactensed. over the electronic lution “’ by large cdt’ons such as ICO(NH~)~] 3c There IS controversy spectral assignments, early workers 176 assqp a band at 18,730 cm-’ to 6A1 4 4 Tz and a band) whilst bdnd dt 22,080 cm-’ to 6A1 + 4A ‘, 4E (this IS probably a charge-transfer others 3’ assign bands at 9100, 11,550and 13,15Ocm-’ to 6AI +4A1, 6Al+4T2 and 6A I --f 4A,, 4E respectively, glvmg Dq values which appear rather low. More recently I”, these transtttons have been ascribed to bands at 8900, 12,800 and 18,000 cm-‘, g’vmg 1ODq
205
COORDINATION CHEMISTRY OI- IRON(II1) values m accordance at 9800,
13,600
with theory
and 17.900
178 and are consistent with the d-d bands of Cs:FezCb cm-’ The reported Isomer shift ‘G lI79 for FeClz- 1s ca. 0.75
mm set-* ; the absence
of a quadrupole
low-energy
spectrum
vibrational
splitting
of (FeC16)3-
lmphes
near octahedral
has been investigated
“’
symmetry_
The
I*‘, vJ(v,,Fe-Cl)
occurs in the range 248-257 cm-‘. v4(6Cl-Fe-Cl) at 181 cm-’ and vl (~~~Fe-cl) at 283 cm-’ _ One expects that (FeBr6)3- would be more unstable, owing to steric factors, it might be formed
m mel?s
No lodlde
complexes
are known
F COMPLEXES Or SULPCIUR DONORS Most of the recent “spin-equlllbna” dlthlocarbamate
interest
m fernc
complexes
m due to the posslblhty
complexes, especially with sulphur-contammg system, doyen of “spm-equlhbrla” compounds,
of obtaining
hgands In this section the will be dealt with first,
followed by dlscusslon of the other systems Metal complexes of sulphur-contdmlng hgands have been revlewed generally by Llvmgstone ‘*I, MKleverty “’ and Coucouvdnis’83 Mdgnetlc moments and hfossbauer parameters for some of these complexes are presented m Tables 4 and 5. (a) Dl~fzmcai-barnates
These black solids were mltldlly
prepared
by DeGpme
IfiJ ““,
but It was Cambl
et al
186-1go who studled a wide range of these compounds at 84, 194, 391 and 350%. They found that room temperature moments varied between 2 3 and 5 9 B M per ferric ion, depending upon the nature of the substltuent R m (R, NCSz)sFe Furthermore, the varlatlon
of susceptlblhty the moments Despite
all
regarded
with temperature Involved complete departure from Curie-Weiss behavlour, geneTally tended towards “low-spm” values as the temperature wds lowered
the inherent
as the correct
Cambl’s mterpretatlon equlhbrlum between S = l/2.
spin”,
lrmltatlons interpretation
m research
at this period,
of the results.
Cdmbl presented
m the words of Martin
what IS still
dnd co-workers’g’,
of thts rather confusing and novel behavlour in terms of”a thermal two magnetlcally lsomerlc forms” (currently termed “low-” dnd “high-
S = 512) was “remarkably
studied a series of N.fV-duubstltuted solution, finding that the anomalous
perceptive”
Martin
dlalkyldlthlocarbam~tes magnetism perslsted
dnd his co-workers
lmtlally
m both the solid state and in benzene and chloroform_ so
that, together with mol wt determmatlons, it WISestabhshed that the magnetic phenomena were not due to antlferromagnetlc (whether inter- or mtra-molecular) effects. It was found that four of the mneteen complexes then studied exhIbIted discrepdncles between the solid and solution magnetochemlstry results These were explamed “I as bemg due to the relaxatlon
of lattice forces !n solution which %mpress distortions on the Fe& octahedra m the sohd state”. The magnetic effects were ratlonahsed In terms of a thermal equlhbrmm between the two possible ground states, 2 T2 and 6A I, with the ’ T2 state being the ground state and the 6A 1 state bemg mLrea.srngly populated as the temperature rose lg2 _ The most reLent publication from these workers Is discussed magnetic measurements made Coord
over a range of temperatures and pressures, A V, the volume difference between the Cixm
Rev,
8 (1972)
206
S A COTTON
Msgnetlc moments of some low-spm compbes
of Sdonors
Complcv
wl (BM
Temperature 1
Ref
&I
Fe&CNButz2)j
2 46
300
207
Fe&CSEt)3
2 19 2 57 2 11 2 26
109
205
Fe(S2CPh)3
2 11 2 45
l-e(S2COhfe)3
Fe(hfcCSCHCS\fe)3 KBa[I-‘c(S2C20~)3j (PW%[I
301
6?C2(CN)2)3]
209
91
15
7 ‘8 __
293 100 293 100 297
2 50
293
1 73 2 00 20-t
-6H2O
103 295
2 2.5
215 218
94
(P~JP)z [ I e(S2C2(CN)2)2(S2CNhle2)]
‘-
2 53
Cd 290
(PhJP),[I-e(S2Cz(CN)2)2(S2CNCtt)l
*
2 60
cn 290
(P~~P)[~c(S~C~(CN)~)(S~CNE~~)~J
2 36
ca 290
(Ph403[Fe&C
2 50
ci3 290
C(CN)2)(S2C2(CN)2)2]3-
213
222
twc St&es, was found to correspond to a contraction of ca 0 1 A m the Fe-S bond on passing from high-spin to low-spm behavrour. The only published crystal structure IS of Fe(S2 CNBU’~~ )a, where
the configuratlon
1s rptermedrate
trrgonal
may be regarded
between
prismatic
as bemg at the corners
of the SIX sulphur and trlgonal of two parallel
atoms
antlpnsmatlc equrlateral
around
the iron atom
lg3 _ The sulphurs triangles,
whrch are ro-
tated by 32” from the trlgonal prlsmatlc configuration The Mossbauer spectra of a number of these compounds have been studled by several workers 144-1g7,the observed quadrupole splittings typically lay III the range 0.4-O 7 mm set-’ It is Important to note that only d smgle spectrum is noted at all temperatures that IS, not one that cdn be analysed as a supermlposltlon of spectra from both high- and low-spm specres This means that the relaxation time from one spm state to another 1s shortel than the hfetrme of the “Fe exctted state, and hence the Isomer shift and quadrupole splitting are functions of the proportions of high- and low-spm species at that temperature Attempts to observe EPR signals m the undiluted compounds were unsuccessful 1g7~1g8 but
Rickards et al lg7 diluted Fe(S,CNMe,)3 with the diamagnetic Co” analogue, and at 4 2°K obtained gl = 2 11 I, g2 = 2 076, and g3 = 2 015 Both the EPR parameters and the small Mossbduer quddrupole splittings (this complex 1s almost entirely low-sprn at 42°K) have
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
207
OF IRON(II1)
TABLE 5 Mossbauer
parameters
for low-spm
Iron(II1) complexes
Complex
with Sdonors
6 (mm set’
I-e(.$CPh)s
AE )” (mm SIX?)
Rcf
Temp (“K)
-O_lOb
I 87
ca 300
209
046
1 84
293
213
OS5
190
0 54
196
42
0 59 065
157 1.69
190 77
220
fe(PhCSCHCOPh)3 Fe(hIeCSCHCOMe)3
060 0 52
190 0 24
80 80
234 234
Fc(MeCSCHCOPh)3 Fe(PhCSCHCOMe)3
061
191
80
234
058 042
168 071
80 77
234
Fe(MeCSCHCSMe)3
Fe(S2CNMe2)3
; Relative
83
196
to nitroprusside
Relative
to “Co
m Pt
been taken to imply little deviation from 0, microsymmetry. The weakness of this correlation (and those for other Fe-S complexes of known structure lW) with structural results IS probably a consequence of neglectm, 0 factors such as configuration interaction lW. bearmg
m mmd the proxinuty of the Dq values for many of these systems to the ‘crossover’ region, it 1s easy to see how this may come about For a more complete descrlptlon of the magnetic phenomena
m the dlthlocarbamate
systems.
the reader
IS referred
to a recent
revlew2”
On treatment of the tns(dlalkyldlthlocarbamates) with small quantltles of concentrated hydrohahc acid, complexes of the formula FeX(S2 CiUR)2 (X = Cl. Br, 1) are obtdmcd Crystallographic
study
201 has shown
that the configuration
about
the non atom
1s dls-
torted square-pyramidal, w1t.h the iron atom slightly raised out of the S4 basal plane. The magnetic behavlour m both the sohd state and solution I2 has shown that there are three unpaired electrons (S = 3/Z), whilst bands m the far-IR spectra of FeX(S2CNEt2)2 (X = Cl, Br) at 353,309
and 225 cm-’ are assigned as v(Fe-S), (Fe-Cl) and (Fe-Br) respectively with a S = 3/2 ion with an apEPR results ” V202gwe g,=4, g,, N 2 at X-band, consistent preciable zero-field sphttmg Mossbauer results on solid samples 203 indicate a large quadrupole splitting (A.E N 3 8 mm see-’ ) but a low Q S has been noted 2W m DMF at 77°K a value sumlar to that notea for the tns(dlthlocarbamates), and m terms of salvation and hence hexacoordmatlon. Rapid removal of DMF from
(AE = 0 70 mm set-I),
Interpreted
these solutions partial
gives a product
dimerlsatlon
had taken
It IS clear that whilst Coot-d Chem Rev,
having
a four-line
an S = 3/Z system
8 (1972)
Mossbauer
specrrum,
It was suggested
that
place. 1s not possible
m a regular
octahedral
or tetra-
S A COTTON
10s
hedrdl field lo under the pomt group C + d ground state 4-A* can be obtamed It IS not surpnsmg, therefore, that many workers hdve studied the magnetic and spectroSLO~IC properties of~ron(ill)-sulphur Martin and his co-workers
The
xanthates
ferric Lhlorlde
Fe(ROCS2)3
complexes
m the years followmg
dnd thloxanthates
Fe(RSCS2
the dls.overles
)3 are readily
prepared
of
from
and the sodmm
salt of the hgand All the xanthates, except the ethylxanthdte, Jppear to be examples of ,I spm-equlare vlrtudlly pure low-spm I5 but the thloxdnthates hbrlur? system ‘05 The alhylthlouanthdte Lomplexes readily ehmmate CS2 to form the dlmerlc d1amagnetlL complexes [Fe(SR)(S2CSR)2] 2, where there are two mercaptide and two thloxanthate dnd no evldeme
bridges ‘06 ‘07 Fe(BufSCS2)3 of dlmer formatlon was found.
1s mere stable than the other thloxanthates this IS asLrlbable to sterlc factors The
structure of Fe(S2 COEt), has been de termmed ‘OR hhe Fe(S2 CNBu’*)3. It contams J very dlstorted arr.mgement of SIX sulphurs about the Iron atom (although the distortion 1s less marked) The dlthlobenzoate, Fe(S? CPh)g IS rather more stable than the foregomg systems, and IS prepared from ferric chloride and sodmm dlthlobenzodte, being purified by recrystalhsdtlon from apolar solvents the usual method for such systems Attempts to prepare FeCI(& CPh), analogous to the dlthlocarbamate systems. were unsuccessful ‘Og COUCOUm the v.m~s and Llppard 210 prepared the smnlar (also low-spm) system Fe@-tolCSz)3 Lourse of studying
the reactlons
of ferrtL chlortde
with Zn(p-tolCS& ,
when the complexes
Fe(~mACS3)2 (p-toICY& ) drid Fe(~+tolCS3)(/~-tolCS2 structure mcludmg magnetic
)* were JISO obtained The crystJ of the last-named complex shows that the coordmatlon of the iron IS octahedral, an FedWsL .s/C Imhage All these complexes are low-spun, with room temperature moments of 2 2-2 5 B M
When an aqueous Fe(MeCS.CHCS*Me),
solution Lontammg aLetylJc.etgne Cl4 IS produced “I. The crystal
and F&I; IS treated with Hz!% the violet structure 2’2 shows the complex to
be composed of (MeCSCHCSMe)’ and FeClj- Ions, upon dlthlontte or borohydrtde reduction, the red-brown complex Fe(MeCSCHCSMe)3 IS formed The g v&es ‘I3 of 2 14, 3 09 dnd 2 01 are typical of low-spin Iron(III) complexes “‘, Mossbauer and magnetic results are m accord with this The structure. determined by X-ray methods, shows that the octahedron of SIX sulphurs dround the iron atom IS only shghtly dIstorted *I’. the quadrupole sphttmg of cd 1.90 mm seL_’ IS rather large, however (c,J Dlthoo.ralarcs The dlthlooxalate ion binds to metals vta sulphur, Dwyer and Sargeson first synthewed the [ Fe(S2 C2 O2 )3 ] 3- Ion *I4 and found /.L,~ to be 2 9.5 B M This 1s very high for a low-span d5 ion. and the authors ascrlbe part of this value to the preseme of high-spm lmpur!tles Later workers *15 prepared samples of KBd[Fe(Sz C2 02)3] 6H2 0 having d mdgnetxc moment of 2 28 B.M . by studymg the Con1 and Crlll analogues, they showed that whilst dlthIooxalate does not lead to excepttonal 04 values, It does reduce the separation of the energy levels of the metal Ion by a constderable
amount,
maktng
sulphur
hgdnds appear
to be ‘strong’
hgands
COORDINATION
CHCMISTRY
Ol- IRON(lII1
209
In the spectrochemlcal sense The Ph4As’ salt IS Jso low-spm, but the (Ph3 PI2 M’ salts (M = Cu, Ag) are lugIt-spm ‘16. It was suggested thdt the metal M binds to two C=G groups and reduces& sufficiently for the change in spm state Treatment of [Fe(S, C2 O2 j3 ] 3- wxth I2 leads to the formation
of [Fel(S,
Cz O2 )t ] 3-_ whose
reported
magnetic moment at room temperature IS 4 03 B M . thts IS quite conststent wttli Its bemg an (S = 3/2) system (cf the monohalob~s(d~th~ocarb,unates)) The EPR spectrum has not been reported, we antlclpdte it being of the (gl = -l,g,, = 2) variety at X-bJnd On reiluxmg a CH2C12 solutmn of [Fe(S,C,02)3 ] 3-, [Fe2(S2C,02)5] 4-, ofunbnown structure, IS
formed (d) Dwymw-l There has been [(S2C2(CN)2 )‘-I [V(S,C2(CN)2)3
?d~throIcncs
atldrelated hgarzds
much interest
ln the structures of complexes of LW-dl~yano- I.?-dlthlolene complexes The envn-onment of the vanddmm Ion m (MeJN)2 ] is that of a very distorted oLtdhedron of sulphurs ‘17 (Phs P)3 [Fe(S2 CZ(CN)2 )3 1 IS prepared from FeCI, *6H, 0 dnd exLess Na2 S2 C2(CN)2. 111 the absence of air, as d darh red solid ‘I’. it 1s readily ouldlsed to the dlamomc species m soiutlon (this cdn be reduced ba& to the Iron(lI1) Lomplex with sulphltc, for ex.mlple) but IS quite stable m the solId state This 1s low-spm and the EPR spectrum *I9 1s qurte typlcsl of .m (S = l/2) species It should however. be noted that the separation of the tzs levels orlgmally suggested ‘I9 IS mLorrect 199 The Mossbduer spectrum Y’ “’ shows d IJrge qudin terms of d conslderdble dIstortIon from drupole sphttmg (CJ 1 6 mm see-’ ) interpreted of nieaningtul cubic symmetry In view of the controversy surroundm, n the dsslgqnient
states to the met&l Ion m such complexes, it is worth noting that on reducmg [Fe(S, C2(CN)2 I,] ‘- to the tn-.mlomL spccrcs. the Isomer shift mcredses from 0 50 to
oxldatlon
0 65 mm set-’ . mdlcatmg that the unpaired electron has entered dn orbital of largely metathc (presumably 3d) character “’ Recently 2t’ , the mixed l-l- I,‘-dlthlolene complexes have been prepared by treatmg
the complexes [Fe(S, C2(CN)2)z ] - with 1, I-dlthtolene hgand, followed by sulphlte reductIon_ Thus (Ph, P)3 [Fe {L-L)(S2 C,(CN), j2 ] (where L-L = c g S2 C C(CN)2. S2C N(CN)) were obtained They are low-spm. havmg room temperature moments of ca. 2 5 B-M at room temperature, however, no EPR or MbGbauer ddtahre yet avarlablc The complexes of the type [ Fe(& Ct (CN), )z ] - are m fact dmlertc. m the solId state,
the environment
of the Iron atom being pentacoordmdte
223*224 In solution, however, the
magnetic behavlour IS typical of an (S = 3/Z) spebies so thdt solvated monomers are probably formed_ A number of sohd complexes of the type [FeL( S, C z (CN)2 )* ] -, where L = m both the e g pyndme, have been prepared 225 which exhlblt S = 3/2 mdgnetll. behavlour sohd state and solution. when L = e g PPh,, blpy, phen, the behavtour IS typlcJl of an value m the (S = l/2) species (S = I /2) ton. The shift of gdv away from the free-electron
may be correlated with the declme m Lewis bastclty of the donor 19’ B&h 226 has very recently reported more adducts of the type [Fe(L”-)(S2 C2 X2 j2] Wan)- (X = CN CF3. L = Ph,PO, Ph3As0, py0. py, Cl, Br) which exhlblt 3 90-4 02 B M dt 296” K)
S = 3/Z mag*letlc
bchdvlour
(P,~~ =
210
S A COTTON
Reactlon of (Bun4N) [Fe {S,CZ(CF~)Z~Z J with tnphenylphosphme, m the presence of air, leads to the for-matron of the S = 3/2 complex (Bu n4N) [Fe(Ph,PO)IS*C2(CFJ)2}21 whrch has a square-based pyrarmdal structure, the non atom being 0.43 A above the basal plane 262 The EPR spectra of frozen acetone or dtchloromethane solutrons of [Fe(py)(S1 C2 (CN),)* ] - are consistent wrth the presence of an (S = 3/2) Ion wnh a defimte zero-field sphttmg,g, N 3.8,g,, N 2. In frozen pyrtdme solutron, however, a strongg, = 2 13,g,, = I 99 resonance IS observed, and this has been ascribed to the low-spur [Fe(py)a (S, C, (CN)t )a I-_ The Mossbauer data 220 for [FetPy)& C, (CN), )2 I- (S = 3/Z
6 = 0.59
l/2, mmsec-’ , A = 2 41 mm set-’ at 77°K) and [Fe(phen)(&Ca(CN)&]-(S= 6=057mmsec’-‘,A=1 80mmsec-’ at 77°K) are interesting as they provide evidence for strong dlstortlons of the field about the iron atom We have, so far, been concerned with complexes exhtbrtmg, at least partly, S = 3/2 or l/2 behawour. The trrs-complexes of 1,I-drcyanoethylene-2,2-drthrolene, [S2 C (CN)2 ] *-,
are high-spin (S = 5/2)227Y228 with reported moments of 5 89 - 5 95 B M At X-band, the EPR spectrum of (Pr “4N)3 [Fe(S,C C(CN),),] hasg, N 6 andg,, ~2, mlplymg a nearly octahedral coordmatlon of sulphurs about the ferric ion rgq_This 1s interesting m view of the fact that the metal-chelate ring IS only four-membered, and a greater dtstortlon might have been expected (e) Dithrophospkates The four complexes Fe(S,PR2)3 (R = Et EtO, Ph, PhO) were first prepared by Malatesta and Przzottr ‘*’ who found that they were h&-spur with peff N 5 9 B M , they are rather hygroscoprc black sohds Jorgensen 230 re-exammed Fe(S2 P(OEt),), and found that crystals of the uon(II1) complex doped mto the mdmm(II1) analogue are quote stable More recentiy, the temperature dependence of ,ueff has been exammed ” for a number of complexes Fe(S20Rz)3 (R = MeO, EtO, Pr”0, and Pr’O), over the range 96-300”K, peff values were in the range 5 61 - 5 85 B M , showmg the complexes to be genumely h&-spur.
(f) S,O dorlors ‘Mixed’ donors where one donor atom IS sulphur and the other oxygen wtll now be considered Fe(2-thropyrtdme N-oxrde)3 has been shown by magnettc measurements 231 and EPR lqq to be high-spin The related mono&no-fl-dtketonates Fe(Rr -CS*CHCO-R2)s (R = e g. Ph, OEt, CF3) were prepared by Ho and Lrvmgstone 232*233who studred-the magnetic properties and postulated a ‘sptn-equthbrtum between S = l/2 and S = S/2 specres, with the (S = l/2) form favoured at low temperatures. They showed that peff was field-mdependent, excludmg ferromagnetic specres, and that the analogous FeIr complexes were not obtamable. Room temperature peif values were 2 3 - 5.8 B M. for then choice of Ri, Ra, for Ri =pvaried from 2 11 B M at 83°K to 5 06 B M at 378°K. W’L R2 = -3, peff Fttzstmmons and co-workers 234 studied the Mossbauer spectra and magnetrc moments of the four complexes where Rr or R2 = Ph or Me. They found similar magnetrc behavtour to that found previously 2327233and, moreover, were able to detect the resonances from
COORDINATION
the separate
spm-Isomers
terns. The high-spm AE ~0,
whilst
1.9 mm.sec-’ complexes temperature
211
CHFMISYRY Ol- IRON(W)
m the Mossbauer
spectra,
m contrast
(S = S/3) species are chdracterlsed
the low-spm
to the dlthlocarbamate
SYS-
by S - 0 75 f 0.1 S mm.set-* ,
speLles have 6 - 0 65 + 0.05 mm set-’ , and AE values
up to
_The mdrvrdual spur-Isomers were also observed m the EPR spectra of the m both the soled state and frozen solution over a wide ‘99, which were obtained range, showing
that the ‘spin-equlhbnum
high-spm species were characterlsed S = I/2 species gave spectra closely
IS not just a solid state effect
The observation of separate EPR and Mossbauer resonances phes that the relaxatron trme from one spur-state to another electron spin relaxation tune and to the hfetlme of the “Fe (g) Other conlplexes Berzelms 235 reported
The
by nearly lsotroplc signals with geE N 4 3 whilst the srmllar to those of complexes of bldentate S donors.
the dark brown
for the two spur-isomers nnis long compared to both the exerted state.
Fe2(CS3)3
as the product of reacttcn between on this and Fe(SEt),, the wrth N&E: 236_ The Iatrer complex IS
FeC13 and NatCS3, but more recent work would be welcomed amorphous of especial
red product interest
of the analogous
m that a monodentate
reaction S donor
1s mvolved
The only example of a complex of a Se donor discussed m this work 1s the ted-brown 2FeC13*MeSe(CH2)3*SeMe whose reported 237 magnetic moment is 5.34 B M. Two possible structures are (I) a polymer with antiferromagnetic mteractlon, or (11) a species of the type [FeC12(MeSe(CH2)3SeMe)2]+ (FeC14)- whrch would require peff for the catlon of ca. 4 7 B M Thus it seems the complex 1s probably a polymer G COMPLEXES 01- PHOSPHOROUS
(I) Monoden
AND ARSENIC DONORS
tate
FeCl, .PPh3 and FeCl, *AsPh3 were prepared 238 by refluxmg Fe3(CO),2 m CHC13 with the &and for 12 h, addrtron of hexane to the concentrated mother-lrquors gave an od whrch on further treatment with hexane and ethanol gave yellow solids, recrystallisable from ethanol Far-IR assignments were v(Fe-P) at 525 cm-’ and v(Fe-Cl) at 370 and 320 cm-’ A number complexes complexes
of amine complexes of reportedly similar storchrometry were shown to be lron(II) and arsme by Blrchall 239, who found the Mossbauer spectra of the phosphme quite consistent with a pseudo-tetrahedral structure For FeC13 .PPhJ at 77”K,
6 = 0 54 mm set-’ and AE = 0 _2 1 mm set-’ , whilst FeCl, lAsPh3 gave 6 = 0 57 mm see-’ , AE=OZmmsec ’ On the other hand, Naldmi ?-XI exammed the reactions of rrlphenylphosphme and tnphenylarsme with a number of ferric salts. Ethereal solutions of Ph3P and Ph3As reacted with anhydrous FeC13 to give very dark red crystals of Fe(Ph3 R)2 Cl3 (R = P, As), which gave non-conducting
MeCN solutions.
the red Fe(Ph3P),(NCS)3, gave the yellow Coord Cllem Rev
ethanohc
Fe(Ph3R)2(N0s)3 8 (1972)
A slmdar ferric nitrate
reaction
occurred
on treatment
These were non-electrolytes
with Fe(NCS)3
t? give
with the hgands
m ether
m mtrobenzene.
All of
212
S A COTTON
these complexes were high-splr, 24’ reported complexes
Nyholm
with peff values of 5 75 - 6 14 B M at room temperature of various tertidry arsme$ of two types, FeC13(R’R;As)2
dnd (FeC13)2 (R’R~As)~ When R’ = Me, R” = Ph, both types of complex were isolated, when R’ = o-tolyl. R” = Me, only the former were obtamed, and when R’ and R” = p-tolyl or Me, only the latter were isolated The colour of the Lomplexes varied from yellow brown. Issheb and Bra& 242 Isolated the yellow FeCIJ *P(Cs H,, )3 from ethanol
to
(It) Polytleittate &mot-s
With this class of hgdnd. all those reported involve Arsenic as donor, mostly with the ltgand dears (cl-phenylenebisdimethylarsme) Reaction of dnhydrous FeC13 m ethanol or benzene with dears affords the crnnson FeCIJ ‘didrs whlLh IS m faLt 243 of an acetone [FeC12 (dlars)t ] ‘(FeCL )-, having petI = 4 55 B M per Fe atom Treatment solution of the complex with HCLO, afford< the red [Fe(dlars)2 C12]+C104-, wtth peft- = 3 34 B M 243 ‘4-1 the FeCl; ton IS of course high-spin Addltlon of dears to excess anhydrous FeBr3 m benzene affords the chocolate-brown FeBr3 -dears (&_tf = 4 57 B M per Fe). bemg fFe(dlars)2 Brz]’ (FeBr4)On careful hydrolys~s, the green [Fe(dlars), Br2 ]+Br- IS formed (this can also be prepared from a 1 1 ratlo of reactants tn ethmol) Fdr-IR assignments are v(Fe-Cl) at 376 cm-’ m [ Fe(dlars), Cl2 ]‘BF;, Y(Fe-Br) at 292 cm-’ m [Fe(dlars)2 Brz ]+BF,, and 273 and 306 cm-’ m [Fe(dlars)2 Brl ]‘Br- (refs 245, 246) The I,?-bts(dlmethyldrsnio)ethylene (edas) [Fe(edasJ2 C12]+(FeClJ)have been prepared, analogue. and the latter by direct reactlon of Methyl-bn(3-propane-dlmethylarsme)arsme llgdnd and the deep green complex Fe(NCS)3
B M . has been isolated 24s Reportedly, Further
mvestlgatlon
The analogous FeC13 m ethanol [Fe(TTA)Cl*]’ IL COUPLCXES
Wtthtn tammg
IS merited
tetradent,tte
complexes Fe(edas)3(C104)3 and the former by HN03 oxldatlon of the Fell the hgand with anhydrous FeC13 m ethanol 247 (TAS, MeAs[(CH2)3AsMet] 2) IS a terdentate -TAS, a non-electrolyte havmg &tt = 2 22
other ferric hcllldes form analogous complexes
here &and
TTA (= As[(CH2)3AsMel]
3) reacts with anhydrous
to form [Fe(TTA)C12]+(FeCla)pefl per Fe = 4 45 B M , so that pelt for IS CA 2 2 B M The chlorines are thought 249 to be (IS 01- CARBON
DONORS
this class, we shall discuss
cyclopentadlenyl
two types,
those contammg
cyanide
and those con-
type hgands
(a) Cyamde K3 Fe(CN)6 1s well known, as are pentacyano species of the type [Fe(CN)sX] ‘-, where X= q !+ 0, NO2 : these are all S = l/2 systems The blue sohds formed from reaction of Fe’II with Fe(CN)b4- or FeI* with Fe(CN)63-
are also famlllar, and appear to be bdsed upon d cubic array of iron atoms with CN- ions
COORDINATION
CHChlISTRY
Oi- IRON(II1)
213
contam along cube edges between them 250 Mossbauer spectra show that these complexes discrete ferrous and ferric tons, measurements on Fe(CN)63- have been made by a number of workers
L’8y2s1_ Magnetrc
measurements
over a temperature
range
I46 on KsFe(CN)e
have been mterpreted in terms of an orbital reductton factor k PL 0.8 and an axial field EPR results a’ grve k = 0.57, A = 220 cm-’ , the g values beingg, = 2 35, A = 400 cm-’ gY =2 lO,g, =0915 For K3Fe(CN)b, has been assigned
reportedly
havtng a monochmc
unit cell (CHID-p7_I,c).
2s2 to an IR band near 520 cm-‘,
dnd 6 (Fe-CN)
studtes in solution 253 give results rather stmtlar, although rather lower energy More work might be carried out m the field of cyanide simple
ligdnd affords
studred
complexes
Crystallographtc
where n-bonding
data \/ould
v(Fe-CN)
Raman
has been assrgned
complexes,
and delocahsatron
Y,,(Fe-CN)
near 400 cm-’
dt
ds thts relatively should
be readily
dlso be welcomed
Oxtdatron of ferrocene yrelds the ferrtcmmm ion, [Fe(n-Cs HS)2]+, whrch contams one unpaired electron and may be formally regarded as a ferric complex It seems that [ Fe(rr-Cs HS )2 ] I3 contams a planar ferrrcmmm Ion ‘~4. although the X-ray study was complicated by drsorder There has been controversy concermng the ground state m these systems, which mtght in Dsd symmetry, dnd, unttl recently, no definite g’)4(a1g’)’ be (alp*)2(e2gf)3 or (e2 EPR data were dvatlable Some carborane
systems
have been synthesrsed2s6
[(rr-CSHS)Fe(B9C2H1r)] Crystallographtc both the ‘carbollide’ and cyclopentadtenyl carbon
and three boron
atoms
bonded
2s6 such as [Fe(B9C2
study 2s7 of the latter hgands were n-bonded,
to the Iron atom,
HI1 )* ]- and
complex showed that the former havmg two
the rmgs were eclipsed,
in contrast
to ferrocene
the EPR of a number of rron(III)-carborane systems at Makl and Berry *” exammed 85”K, and found signals that could be descrtbed in terms of an axially symmetrtc g-tensor (see Table 6) and a certam amount of delocahsatron Comparrson wrth theoretrcai predrctrons indicated the ground state to be (alg1)2(e2g’)3 Recent EPR studies on highly purified samples of [Fe(lr-CsHs)2]+ salts gave srmrlar spectra at 77”K, rmplymg a stmrlar ground-state configuratton These workers ascnbe the prevrous
non-observatron
small quantrties
of impurity
of spectra
at 77°K
to the extensive
2sg Prms 260 has also Investigated
lure-broadenmg
effect
the EPR spectra
of
of some
ferrtcmtum systems HIS spectrum from {Fe(rr-CS H,)a}’ 13- IS not ds well resolved as those between the reported of Horsfield and Wasserman 2s9, it may account for some dtfferences g values (see Table 6), but it does appear that amon or solvent perturbations also are rmportant Hn results are m general concordance with other workers. the energy levels are The calculated separatron between the ]MJ I= S/3 and ]MJ I= 3/Z 2 Se2g3 < *elg arg ton, this small sphttmg levels is 800 cm-’ m the ferricinmm the short relaxation tunes above 77OK. Coord
Chem REV., 8 ( 1972)
IS undoubtedly
responsrble
for
S A COTTON
214 TABLE 6 Values ofg for ferrvaruum-type systems
Compound
g1
lFe(%&H1r)21I~e(BgHK2Mez)21-
3 94
1 532
2 79
1711
Glass ( l- 1 DMr CHCI3) Glass (1 1 DMF CHC13)
Medium
gll
j(nCsWre(BgC2Hlt)J
3
58
1 778
Gldss (1 1 DMI- CHC13)
Ire(B9H9C2HPh)2
I-
3 57
1 799
Glass (1 1 DMr CHC13)
I-
3 70
1 725
Powder
3 28
1 87
Smgle crystal
3 26
1 86
3 35
1 85
Pobder Glass (CH2C12)
3 15
1 82
Powder
3 20
190
Glass (H20)
4 35
1 26
Glass (DMF)
4 17
1 47
Glass (DMr)
3 98
1 58
Class ( DMl-)
3 83
167
Glass ( DMr)
3 88
1 68
Gla~.s (DMr)
3 69
1 73
Glass (DMF)
3 63
1 74
Glass (H2SO4)
3 62
1 76
Glass (DMl-)
lre(BgHgC2HPhJ2 l
IFeC~Cs~Js)z
1
(trlchloroxetdte)-
There IS obviously much scope here for work on complexes containing u-bonded carbon. .%I obvious reactlon which could be tried IS that of a benzyl Grlgnard with fernc chloride, m the hope of obtammg 1
Fe(CH2 Ph)3 or a related
compound
CONCLUSION Rather limited X-ray data are avadable (see Appendix)
but it IS clear that most FeII*
complexes mvolve approximately octahedral coordmatlon. Ferric iron readily complexes with oxygen donor hgands and with hahdes (except I-, because of the redox reaction Ee3+ + I- + Fe’+ +* I*) Its affrmty for monodentate nitrogen donors IS hmlted, the most stable ones seem to be those where Cl IS also present in the coordmatlon sphere. Fe-S complexes are also very important, although they often decompose
readily. Very little has been done with other donor atoms, and this remams a major omlssmn The Isolation, and more Important, characterrsatron of further stable phosphme complexes would bz a malor step forward. Much of the work performed
so far has been of a very haphazard nature, complexes
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
OF IRON(W)
215
have generally prepared with the sole object of comparison with other Ions, so :hat generai trends are obscured, and there is a need for a systematic approach Since the hrgh-spm d5 ion has no crystal-field stabrhzatron energy, mvestrgatton of unusual coordmation numbers (espectally pentacoordmate species) mrght prove rewarding; investigation \zf mteracttons between ferrtc salts and ammo acrds or nucleotrde bases could be mterestmg from the brological angle Generally speaking, there IS much scope for both experimental and theoretrcal work m the field One example of this hes m the field of electronic spectra, where, m S = S/2 systems, opportunity is afforded for calculatmg the D value from the electronic spectra and comparmg tt with the value obtained from EPR or single crystal susceptrbrhty measurements The D value IS related I9 to the sphttmg of the lowest 4T1 state by the equation
where 5 1s the spin-orbit coupling constant and E,, Ey, Ez the ener@es of the components of the 4Tl state relattve to the 6A1 ground state Lrkewrse, the mterpretatron of the electronic spectra of the low-spur complexes would be an important step towards an a M-0 scheme whtch would account for the bmdmg m these complexes, as well as for the Mossbauer and EPR parameters ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The reviewer w&es to thank Dr. Peter Thornton (Queen Mary College, London) for helpful comments upon the manuscript, and Dr. John Gibson (Imperial College, London) who introduced hrm to ferric complexes He is indebted to the Science Research Council for financial support
Coord
Chem
Rev,
8 (1972)
--
2 35-2
----p
4 I(CI)
I e(mc)2CI
K3I e(o’&te)3
We {(NSlh)&
I
~C(~dCl~)CIg(Cli3N02),
’ 1918(N)
2 064- 2 099(N)
I 879-1885(O),
2 238(Cl)
2 09(0112)
2 017-2,092(O), 2 29(N)
2 ~07(0~~2)
1 938-2,128(O), 2 304-2,346(N)
] eH20
LI[ I’e(LDTA)OH2
Cd[l c(DCI ~I)0112 ] 48H2O
2 lO6(Oll2)
I 974-2 085(O), 2 312-2322(N)
1 *l-l20
Rbll c(LDTA)0H2
P3/L
2
2
4
c2/1 Ai21a
8
PlJta
I?/a
N3
02N2CI
N2O5
142
100
125
II9
I20
N2O5
N2O4
25(N)
I’?., Ic
2 19-2
1 93-Z 03(o), 2 07(OH2)
I>IIAH)OH2]
[h(I
82
II3
X8
XI
164
163
I61
50,
35
34
7-r
38
__P-....
II9
06
6 4
RXc
2 008(O)
I_
Rcl
N2O5
06
4
I’?, /c
4
04Cl
4
I’? * /t1
m(0)
I 95(O), 2 213(CI) 2 01-2
Cl4
8
06
Cl4 Cl4
4 4
Cl4
2
04c12
I’lJta
I c( tropolon,~tc)3
31-120
I 986-2,004(O)
I c(mc)3
01
/‘?I 212, P/JClli
2 180-2218(CI) 2 182-2 I87(CI)
l~cl,+I~ccI;
NJ+I &Ii
CCIi
14
(l’h4A\)+I /‘/JC ?,
OCIS
4
4
141/a
t’JJlJl(J
O4Cl2
2
/‘4/ftirw~
14% 04c12
2 2
/‘4/u
--____
l/l ( lmwoplmrc
C?/lll
_-_
S]LILCgou]~
-cI_-P-_-______
2 19(CI)
2 l62(1 cc’&)
2 07(O), ? 37(U)
2 08(O),
(NII4)21l CCI5(Oll2)] [I c(Mc2S0)&t2 J+hCl~
e(0112)4&
1fSbCI~*4H20
2 36(U)
7, 08(O),
(I‘c(Otl~)~Cl~]+CI-.2tl~0
[I
I 94(1 ) 2 3O(CI)
1 94(O), 2 07(O),
31120
p-r
cl-3
__--
dfk-x)
ddtd tor won(lll) complcm
(A) --I_
Crysullogrrpho -_-_
AI’I’CNl)IX
I62
--
_
IJ m
COORDINATION CHEMISTRY OF iRON(II1)
Coard. Chem Rev, 8 (1972)
217
218
S A COTTON
RI-I l-RIINCCS 1 N V
Stdgutck, The Chemtcal EletltCtztS arid Ttznr Compourzds, Vols I and II. Oxford Unrverslty Press, London 1950 2 Gnzelztz’s Ilandhuciz dcr Anorgamschen Chcmre Verldg Chemlc, Wemhctm 1932 3 J W \lellor, Comprelzenszre Treatzse OH lnorgazzzc arzd Tlzeorerzul Chenzzstry Longmans Green. London, 1932 4 P Pascal, Noun razz TraztPde Clzzzzzzehlzneinle Masson, P,Iw, 1959 5 R Colton and J H Cantertord, Halzdes of the Fvst Row Trarzstttott Elements Wtley-Intersctence, Neu York, 1969 6 H A 0 H111and P Ddy, Physzcai Teclzmqzw~ III Advanced Inorgazzzc Chemzstry Wzley-Interxlencc, rrlew York, 1968 7 N N Greenwood, Cizem Brat 3 ( 1967) 56 8 B A Goodman and J B R.zynor, Adian Inorg Clzem Radzoclzem 13 (1970) 135 9 P W Atkms and M C R S> mons, Tlie Strzccrzzrc oj Izzorganzc Radzcals Elsevrcr, Amsterdam, 1967 10 J S Grztfith, J itzorg Nrtcl CXem 2 (1956) 1 11 J S Grzffith,Dlscuss Faraday SOC 26 (1958) 81 12 R L hfartm and A H Wbzte, Itzofg Chem 6 (1967) 7 12 13 B N I‘~ggzs, Irons Faraday Sot 57 (196 1) 199 14 B N I’I~~Is, M Gerlocb .md R Mason, Proc Ro, Sot. Ser A 309 (1969) 91 IS A H fwald, R L hl.xtzn, C Sznn Jnd A II Whzte, horg Clzem 8 (1969) 1837 16 J H Van Vlec?. .md W G PcnncJ , flzrl brag 17 ( 1934) 96 1 17 A Abrngam and hl H L Pry~e, Prop ROY Sot Ser_ A 205 (1951) 135 18 B R N&arvey, rransztzozz Mefal Clzem 3 ( 1966) 89 19 J S Grzflith,Mol P/z~s 8 (1964) 213, 217 20 R D Doxcsmgand J I Czbson J Clzc~z Plz~s SO (1969) 294 21 B Bleancy and hl C hl 0 Brzen, f’ro~ Phys Sot Londozz, Sect B 69 (1956) 1216, J S Griffith, TFze Theory Of Trazzsztzorz-Metal fofzs Cambrzdge Unzverszt> Press, London, 196 1 22 R l-1 Herbcr, R B Kmg and G K Werthclm, frzorg CIzerzz 3 ( 1964) 101 23 S A Cotton and J I‘ Gzbbon, J Chenz Sot A (1971) 1693 24 B Blc.mcy and R S Trenam, Proc Roy Sot Scr A 223 (1953) 1 25 hl D Lmd, J Cizem P~I_IS 47 ( 1967) 990 26 B R Pentold and J A Grrgor, Acta Crystallogr , 12 (1959) 850 27 Y Kerznarrcc, Compt Rend X8 (1964) 5836 28 E R.zbmo\rzt7 and W H Stockm+wr, J Amer Clzem Sot 64 ( 1942) 335 29 H L l‘rzedznan, J Amer C!zem Sot 74 (1952) 5 30 G W Bradv, %I B Robm .md J Varlmbz, Inorg C/zcnz 3 ( 1964) I168 31 S B.dt and A M A Ver\~e~,SpeLtrocl~rtzz Acta Part A 23 (1967) 1069 32 L-Y. Wang, J Chem Plzys 32 ( 1960) 598 33 R I‘ Wemland and C rczgc. Clrefzz Ber 36 ( 1903) 244 34 A Icrrarl, L C.w.11c.z .md XI L f.ml, Gazz Clznn Ital 87 (1957) 22 35 I Lmdqvlst, ,trh Kenzl 24A (1947) 1 36 H P Mug, I: Kummer and L Alexmder,J Avzer Chenz Sot , 70 (1948) 3064 37 I‘ Kr.nzs and T V Heidelberg, J PraXt Cizcnz 121 (1929) 364 38 G Teutcr, Acta Crystallogr 17 (1964) 1480 39 1 \V Breman, A M A Veraey And S Bait Spectroclzzm Arta Part A, 7-4 (1968) 1623 40 R C. Wallace, Z Knstallogr Mzrzeral 49 ( 19 11) 4 17 41 H RCmy and H Busch, Chem Ber 66 (1933) 96 1 42 G A Barbzerz, Attz Accad Naz Lzzzcez Rezzd Ci Scz Fzs Mat ,Vatur 22 (1913) 867 43 S A Cotton and J r Gzbson, J C/zem Sac A. (1971) 1690 44 S. Holt and R Dangle, Acfa Clrem Stand 22 (1968) 1091 45 R B Penland, S Mzzushuna, C Curran and J V Quaglzano, J Anzer Chem Sot 79 (1957) 1575 46 R J Berm, R R Benertto and H B Jonarsen, J Inorg Nucl Cilem 31 (1969) 1023
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
219
OF IRON(III)
47 F 4 Cotton and R rrancls, J Amer Chem. Sot 82 (1960) 2986 48 H L Schlafer and H P. Opttz, Z Anorg AIlg Chem , 3 13 (196 1) 178. 49 C H Langford and F M Chung, J Amer Chem Sot 90 (1968) 4485 SO hl J Bennett, f- A Cotton and D L Weaver, Acia CrysruiIogr, 23 (1967) 581 51 B r G Johnson and R-A W.dton, Spectrochn Acta 22 (1966) 1853. 52 C V Berney and J H Weber, Inorg Chem 7 (1968) 283 53 R Frances and F A Cotton, J Chem Sot (1961) 2078 54 C C. Prapakharan and C C Patel, J Inorg Nucl. Chent 32 (1970) 1223 55 J V Quagharto. J fUJIta, G Trzmz, D J Phtlllps, J A W~lmslcy and S Y Tyree
J Imer
C’hem Sot
84
83 (1961) 3770 R L Carlm, J Amer Chem SOL 83 (196 1) 3773 K Issheb and E I Krctblch, Z Afrlorg ClJern 313 (1961) 338 D X West, T J Delta and J hi W~lco\, J iuorg ,hcf Chem 3 I (1969; 3665 S A Cotton and J r Glbxon, J Cavern Sot A (1970) 2105 G Stephan xtd l-l Specker, Natcrrrr lsseuschafren, 55 (1968) 443 R Whyman, W L: Hatfield and J S Pasch.d, Inorg Chrm Acta l (1967) 113 R r Wemland and 0 S&mid, Arch Pharm (Wemkem~) 26 1 (1923) 4 J T Dono&uc and R S Drago, Inorg Chem 2 (1963) 1158 N Xl Kdra] annts, E C Bradshaw, L L Pytlwckl and XI M Labe\, J Inorq I?IIlcl Ckm 37 ( 1970) 1079 W C Bull, S K bladan and J r w1111\,1nm-g C’hcm , 2 (1963) 303 S K Xladan .utd H I1 Denh, J Inorg %cl Chem 27 (1965) 1049 E B.mmster .md r A Cotton, J C/JCUJ Sot (1960) 1878 \I J r rzer, W Gerrard and R Tx%alt\, J Ittorg ,\ucl Chem 2?i ( 1963) 637 D J Phdhps dnd S Y Tyree, J Amer Chem Sot 83 ( 196 1) 1806 S A Cotton and J I- Gibson, J Chem Sot A ( 197 1) 859 N 11 Karayanms, C \I Wkulskl, L L Pq tle!cskl and M \I Labcs, f~org Chcm 9 ( 1970) 582 A roster, C Cooper and G Y,trro\\, J Chm Sot ( 1917) 810 B P Susz and P Chdxtdon, Hell Chum Acra 41 ( 19.58) 1332 R C Paul, R Pxkosh .md S S Sandhu, Z Imorg /l/fg Cirenr 352 ( 1967) 322 P A Thlessen and 0 Koerner, 2 41zorg AIIg Chcm 19 1 ( 1930) 74 D C Bradley, R K Slultdnt and IV Wardla\%, J Chcm SM ( 1958) 126 R IV Adams, E Bishop, R L ‘&rtm and G Wmtcr,,?ust J Chcm 19 (1966) 207 R W Adams, G G Barraclough, R L Martm .md G U’mtcr, horg Chem 5 ( 1966) 346 E Lloyd, C B Brown, D G R Bonncll and W J Joucs J Chem Sot ( 1928) 658 R K hlultam, Indlarl J Chem 2 (1964) 508 R B Roof,Acrn Cr~srallogr 9 ( 1956) 781 J lboil 2nd C 11 Morgan, 7 LCJ Crlstallogr 23 ( 1967) 239 T A Hamor and D J b’atkm, C’hew~ Commttn ( 1969) 140 Al Gerloch, J Lews md R C Slnde, J Chem Sot A (19691 1422 K Naknmoto, P J \lcCarth>, A Ruby and A L \lxtell, J Amer Chcm Sot 83 ( 196 I) 1066
85 86 87 88 89
K Nakomoto, C Udovltch .md J Tdkcmoto, J Amer Chem Sot 92 (1970) 3973 T S PIper and R L Carlm, Inorg Chem 2 ( 1963) 263 D \I Purl and R C \lchotra J Less CWJVJO~J Merals 5 ( 1963) 2 P I Lmdle) and A W Smith, Chern CO~J~?JIUJ ( 1970) 1355 \I Cou, B IV I ttzsm~mon~, A W Smtth, L r Lorkuorthy .md K A Rogers, Chem Commw
56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
76 77 78 79 80
81 82
83
90 91
92 93 94 95
183 H B M.&wr and \I P Gupta, Indun J Chem 5 (1967) 208 C W A. foules, D A Rtce .md R A Wdton, J Cirern Sot A (1968) I842 P A \lcCusker,T J Lane. and S hl S Kennard, J &ner Chem Sot 81 (1959) 2974. G WA I‘owlcs, D A Rice Jnd R A Walton, J Inorg Ncrcl Chem 3 1 (1969) 31 19 J A Walmxley and S Y Tyree, horg Chrm 2 ( 1963) 3 12 M D Joesten and K Xl N> herk, 1tlorg Chem 3 ( 1964) 548
Coord
Chem Rev , 8 ( 1972)
( 1969)
S A COTTON P G Sunpson, A. Vmceguerra and J V Quaghdno, Irzorg Cizem , I?(1963) 283 A. Vmce_ruerra P G Szmp:on, Y Kakmtz and J V Quaghano, Inorg Chem 2 (1963) 286 W M Rezff and W A Baker, Jr , bzorg Cilem 9 ( 1970) 570 P. Ptexffcr and T Tsumakz, Jusrzrs Lzebzgs Amz Cizem , 503 ( 1933) 84 91 Gerloch, J LWIS, F E hfabbs and A_ Rzchards, ilrnfztre 212 (1966) 809 CI Gerloch and F E. Mabbh,J Chenr SOC A (1967) 1598 hl Gerloch, J Lewis, r I: Mabbs and A Rlchards,J C/rem Sot A (1968) 112 G M BJncroft, A G hladdock and R P Randl, J CiIem Sot A. (1968) 2939 J LenIs, F C blabbs, A Rrchsrdsdnd A S Thornley,J Cilem Sot A (1969) 1993 A. van den Bergen, K S Murray, Xl J O’Connor, N Rehak and B 0 West, Aust J Chem 21 (1968) 1505 106 K S Murray and B 0 West, Inorg Mrcl CIzem Lert 4 (1968) 439 107 J T Summers and J V Quaghano, horg Chenz 3 ( !964) 1767 108 A Cdrnshdw, B N Fzgg~s and J Lewzs, J Cizem SOC A (1966) 1656 109 P Thornton, J Cizem Sot A (1969) 632 110 A Rose&elm and P hluller, Z Atlorg Cizem 39 ( 1904) 175 111 H Hardt and W &loller, Z Azzorg AIZg Chem 313 (1961) 57 1I? K Starke, J Inorg A’zrcl CIzem 25 (1963) 823 I1 3 P Herpm Bull Sot Fr Mzrzeral Crzstallogr 8 1 (1958) 245 111 \I Baudran, AWI CJZUEPizys 19 ( 1900) 563 115 C A BfcAuldte, J V. Quaghdno and C Xl Vaildrmo, Inorg Chem 5 (1966) 1996 116 A Tornlta, H Hxal and S hfaklshlma, hzorg Cizem 6 (1967) 760 117 A Roder and E Bqer, Anger Cizem Int Ed tngl 6 (1967) 7-63 118 D L Leussmg and I M Kolthoff, J Amer Chem Sot 75 (1953) 390x 119 M D Lma, hl J Hamor, T A Hamor and J L Hodrd, Inorg Cilenz 3 ( 1964) 34 120 C H L Kennard, horg Chun Acra 1 (1968) 347 121 S A Cotton, J I- Gibson and N J Hdl, unpublished results 122 R Ads, K E Cnrlson, L S A Reyes and T Vanngard, Arh Kemz 25 ( 1966) 285 123 W E Blumbcg, u- A Ehrenberg, B G M~lmstrom and T Vanngard (Eds ), Mugzzerzc Resoo,zalzce uz Bzologrcal Sysrems Pergarnon, New York, 1967 124 W Klemn-, Z 4~org Cixcm 252 (1944) 225 125 G H Cohtn and J L Hoard, J Amer Cizem SOL 88 (1966) 3218 116 D 1 orster and D M L Goodgame, J Ckm Sot. (1965) 268 127 D rorster and D hl L Goodgdme, horg Cizem 4 (1965) 7 15 128 R J H Clark Jnd A D J Goodwm, Spectrocizzm Acto Part A 26 (1970) 323 129 J Leulh, R S Nyholm dnd P W Smith J Chem Sot (1961) 4590 130 D rorster Jnd D 11 L. Goodgme, J Chem Sot (1965) 262 131 W. Bdtz and E Bark, Z &zorg AIig Cheni 134 (1923) 125 132 r. Cphralm dnd S Mdlmann, Cizem Ber 50 (1917) 529 133 G Spacu, Am SCI L’nw Jussy, 8 (1914) 30 134 R I \\‘eirddnd and A Kzsslmg, Z Arzorg Allg Cizem 120 (1921) 209 135 A P Gm\brrg dnd hl B Robm, hot-g Cizem , 2 (1963) 817 136 G A Barblrrl and G Pampamm, Attz Accad Na= Lzrzcez Rend, CI SCI Fzs Mar Natw , 19 (19 10) 593 137 C D Burbndge, M J Cleare and D M L Goodgame,J C/rem Sot A, (1966) 1698 138 S-A Cotton and J 1 Gzbson,J Cizenz Sot A (1971) 1696. 139 H Petersen, Jr and R S Drago, Inorg Cizmz Acfa 3 (1969) 155 140 N A Daugherty and J H Swisher, Irzorg C/zem 7 (1968) 1651 14 1 H Burger and V Wdnndgat, Monatsil Clrem , 94 (1963) 1007 142 D C Bradley, M 9. Hursthouse and P F Rodesder, Cizern Commun , (1969) 14 K D Sales, B W I‘ltzs~mmons and C C Johnson, 143 E C Alyea, D C Bradley, R G Copperthwalte, Ciiem Commun (1970) 1715 144 A Games. L P Hammett and G H Walden, J Amer Cizem Sot 58 (1936) 3908 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
OF IRON(III)
221
145 F Biau, Monarsh. Clrem , I9 ( 1898) 647 146 B N Flgg~s, Tram Faradqv Sot 57 ( 1961) 204 147 A A Schdt, J Amer Chem Sot , 82 (1960) 3000 148 B N Flggls, J Lewis, F E Mabbs and G A Webb, J Chem Sot A, (1966) 422 149 R R. Berrett. B W Fltzsunmons and A A Owusu, J Chem Sot A (1968) 1575 1.50 R E desunone and R S Drago, J Amer Cilem Sac 92 (1970) 2343 151 C M Harrts and T N Lockyer, Chem Znd (London) (19.58) 1231 152 A Sunon, G Morgenster and W H Albrecht, Z Anorg AIlg Chem 230 (1937) 225 153 C A Renovltch and W A Baker, Jr, J Amer Chem Sot 90 (1968) 3585 154 B Chtsweli, F Lions and B S Xforrrs, Znorg Chem 3 (1964) 110 155 W hf Relff W A Baker. Jr and N E Erxckson J Amer Chem Sk_ 90 (1968) 4794 156 R A Walton, J Chem Sot A (1967) 1487 157 K A Hoffman and G Bugge, Chem Ber (40 (1907) 376 1 1.58 R L Coiims, R Petttt and W A Bdkcr, Jr J Znorg Nucf Chem 28 (1966) 1001 159 E Fielscher and S Hawkmson. J Amer CZzem Sot 89 (1967) 720 160 S bf Nelson P Bryan and D H Busch Ckem Commun (1966) 641 161 B Zasiow and R E Rundie, J Phys Chem , 61 (1957) 490 162 M J Bennett, F A Cotton and D L Weaver, Narure 2 12 (1966) 286
163 R R Richards and N W Gregory, J 164 T J Klstenmacher and G D Stucky, 165 G M Bancroft. A G hfaddock, W K 166 C K Jorgensen, Absorprlon Specrra
69 (1965) 239 Znorg Chem , 7 (1968) 2150 Ong and R H Prmce J Chem
Phys Chem
Sot A (1966) 723 and Chemtcal Bondmg m Comple_kes Pergamon, NC\\ York,
1962 167 C A Ciausen and M L Good, Znorg Chem , 9 (1970) 220 168 J S Avery C D Burbrldge and D XI L Goodgame, Specfrochrm Acta Part A 169 R D Peacock and D W A Sharp, J Chem Sot (1959) 2762 170 A de Lattre, J Chem. Phys 20 (1952) 1180 171 R S Nyhoim and A G Sharpe, J Chem Sot (195213579 172 D B Shmn, D S Crocket and H hl Haendler, Znorg C’hern 5 (1966) 1971 173 A Tressaud.
174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193
24 (1968)
1721
J Portler. S Shearer-Turreii, J -L Dupm dnd P fidgenmUiitr J Zfrorg Nt& C/rem , 32 (1970) 2179 H Levanon. G Stem and Z Luz. J Amer Chem Sot 90 (1968) 5292 W E. Hatfield, R Whyman, R C ray, K N Raymond and f Basoio, Znorg Stn , I1 (1968) 48 W E Hatfield, R C Fay, C E Pfiuger dnd T S Plper, J 4mer Cizem Sot , 85 ( 1963) 265 H Yamatera and A Kato, Bull CJtem Sot Jap 41 (1968) 2220 C K Jbrgensen, Dzscuss Toraday Sot 26 (1958) 110 C A Ciauscn and M L Good, Znopg Cfzem 7 (1968) 2662 D hf Adams and D hl hforrls, J Chem Sot A. (1968) 694 S E Llvmgstone, Quart Rev Chem Sot 19 ( 1965) 386 J A UcCleverty. Progr Znorg Chem 10(1968)49 D Coucouvams, Progr Inorg Chem 11 (1970) 233 bl Deiepme, Bull Sot Chum Fr 3 (1908) 643 hl. Dei@ne,C R Acad SCI 146 (1908) 981 L Cambl and L Szego, Chem Ber 64 (1931) 2591 L Cambl, L Szego and A Cagnasso, Attz Accad NQZ Lintel. Rend CI SCL FH , &Id Nat 15 (1932) 266 L Cambl, L Szego and A Cagnasso. Aftr Accad Naz Lmce:. Rend , CI Scr FKS, Mar Nar , 15 (1932) 329 L Cambl and L. Szegb. Cizem Ber 66 (1933) 656 L. Cambl and L. Mdatestn, Chem Ber 20 ( 1937) 2067 A H Wiute, R Roper, E Kokot, H Waterman and R L Martm. Arfsf J Chem 17 (1964) 294 A H Ewaid, R i h!drtm, 1 G Ross and A H White. hoc Roy Sot , Ser A. 280 (1964) 235 B.F Hoskms and B P Kelly, Chem. Commztn (1968) 1517
Coord
Chem Rev.
8 (1972)
222 194 R M Goldmg
S A CO-l-l-ON
and H J WhItfield. Truns Faraday Sot 62 (1966) 1713. 5 ( 1966) 1453 Frank and C R Abcledo, Itrorg Chent 196 R Rrckards, C lc. Johnson and H A 0 Hdl, J Chem PJtys 48 (1968) 523 1 197 R Rlckards, C E Johnson and H A 0 Hdl,J Chem Phys 53 (1970) 3118 198 S A Cotton, J.T Gibson and J P N Haxell, unpublished results 199 S A Cotton and J f G&son, J Chem Sot A. (1971) 803 hiartm and A H Whtte, Transttton Metal Chent 4 ( 1968) 113 200 R 201 B I Hosktns, R L Martin and A H White, Nature 211 (1966) 627 202 H.H Wrckman and F R Merrrtt, C/rem Phys Letr , 1 ( 1967) 117 203 H H Wlckman and A M. Trozzolo, lnorg CJtem 7 (1968) 63 204 3 L K F de Vrles, J M Trooster and E de Boer, Inorg CJtem , 10 (197 1) 8 1 205 A H Cwafd md E Srnn, *lust J CJlem , 21 (1968) 927 706 D Coucouvdnis, S J Lippard and J A Zubieta, J Amer. CJzem Sot 91 (1969) 761 207 D Coucouvanis, S J Ltppard and J A Zubieta, J Anter CJtem Sot 92 (1970) 3342 208 B r Hobkms and B P Kelly, CJtem Commroz (1970) 45 209 C Cervone. F D Camassei, M L Lucram and C Furlam, J Inorg Ntrcf Chem , 31 (1969) 1101 210 D Coucouvanrs and S J Lrppard, J 4mer CJtem Sot 90 (1968) 3287 21 1 K Knauer. P Hemmerrch and J D W Van Voorst ,_&lge\c Ciiem Itu Ed En@ 6 (1967) 262 ( 1968) 1673 212 R Mason, t D McKenzie, G B Robertson and G A Rusholme. CJzem Comnrrot 213 R. Beckett, G A Heath, B r Hoskins B P Kelly, R L Martin, I A G Roos and P L Welckhardt Irrorg ,Vuci CJtent Letr 6 (1970) 2.51 214 I- P Dwyer and A hl Sargeson J -lmer CJtem Sot 81 ( 1959) 2335 215 R L Cxhn and F Canzram, J CJzem PJz_vs 40 ( 1964) 37 1 116 D COULOUV~S R f Coffntan and D Ptitmgsrud. J Amer CJzem Sot , 92 (1970) 5004 II7 C 1 Stietel, Z Dart and H B Gray, J Amer CJzem Sot 89 (1967) 3353 218 J A M&leverty, J Locke, E J Wharton ,md M Gerloch, J CJrern Sot -l (1968) 816 219 S 9 Cotton and J 1 Crbron, CJtem Commtrrt (1968) 883 120 T Birchall and N N Greenwood, J_ CJtem Sot A (1969) 286 121 R Rrch,xrdp C C Johnson zmd H A 0 Hdl, J CJreuz Sot A ( 1971) 797 222 J A UcrCIe\erty D G Orchard and K Smith, J CJtem Sot A (197 1) 707 223 W C Hamilton and 1 Bern& Inorg CJtem , 6 ( 1967) 2003 224 A C. Bnlch 1 G Dance and R H Helm, J Amer CJtent Sot , 90 (1968) 1139 225 J A \lcCleverty, N M Atherton, N G Connell? and C J Wmscom, J CJtent Sot A (1969) 224 10 ( 197 I) 276 216 A L Bnlch, Ittorg CItem 227 J P l‘achler and D CouLouvarus, J Amer CJzem Sot 88 (1966) 3913 228 13 G \‘Cerdcn, E Bdhr and H B Grq , horg Ckttt , 5 ( 1966) 78 229 L MaIateht,! and R l&zottr, CJttm Itld (Mtlart] 27 (1945) 6 ‘13OC K Jbrgensen, J. Inorg ,Vttcl CJtem, 24 (1962) 1571 23 I J A W Ddzrel and M Thompbon, Attaf_vsr (Londonj 89 (1964) 707 232 R K Y Ho and S E Lnmgstone, Chem Contmun (1968) 217 21 (1968) 1987 233 R K Y Ho and S E Llvmgstone, Ausr J C/tern 234 M Cou, J Darken, B W rltzslmmons, A W Smith, L r Larkworthy and K A Rogers, C/rem Cortzn?trtt ( 1970) 105 235 J Berzehus, Pogg -Inn 6 (1826) 455 236 W l-erg1 and J Backer, Z 4trorg Mg CJtem 74 (1928) 396 237 E E Aynsley, N N Greenwood and J B Leach, CJtent Irtd (Londonj. (1966) 379 238 P P Sin& and R Rnest, Can J CJtem 46 (1968) 1773 239 T BIrchall, GUI J C/tern, 47 (1969) 1351 240 L Naldmr, Ga=r CJtrm fral, 90 (1960) 1231 241 R S Nlholm, J Proc Roy Sot N S 1%‘.78 (1944) 229 277 (1954) 254 242 K Issheb .md A. Brack, Z Anorg Allg Chem 243 R S Nyholm, J CJtem Sot (1950) 851 244 R S. Nyholm and R V Parrsh. CJtem Ittd (Londonj (1956) 470 195 E
COORDINATION
CHEMISTRY
Ol- IRON(III)
245 J Lea& R S Nyholm and G A Rodley, J Chem Sot , (1965) 1483 246 G S r Hazledean, R S Nyholm and R V Partsh, J C/rem Sot A ( 1966) 162 247 R D Feltbarn, H G Metzger and W Sliverthorn, Inorg C/rem 7 ( 1968) 2003 248 G A Barclay and R S Nyholm. Chem Ind (Londotz), (1953) 373 249 G A Barclay and A K Barnard, J Chem Sot ( 196 1) 4269 250 M B Robm, Inorg Chem 1 ( 1962) 337 251 N Costa, J Danon and R M Zavler,J Phys Cilem Solrds 23 ( 1962) 1783 252 J T R Dunsmurr and A P Lane J Chenz Sot A (1971) 776 253 W P Grrffith and G T Turner, J CIzcm Sac A (1970) 858 254 Y. Bernstem and F H Herbstem, Acru Crysruilogr , Seer 5 , 24 ( 1968) 1640 2.55 M r Hawthorne. D C Young and P A Wegner, J Amer Chem Sot 87 (1965) 1818 256 M F Hawthorne and R L Pllhng, J Amer Chem Sot 87 (1965) 3987 2.57 A Zalkm, D H. Templeton and T I: Hopkms, J_ Amer Chem Sot 87 (196.5) 3988 258 A H Makl and T E Berry, J Amer Chem Sot 87 (1965) 4437 259 A Horsfield and A Wasserman, J Chem Sot A (1970) 3202 260 R Prms, MO/ Phys 19 (1970) 603 261 J Drummond and J S Wood, Cilem Commun , (1969) 1373 262 K Knox and D 1% Mitchell,/ f?zorl: Nucl Chem 21 <1961) 253 263 E f Epstem, 1 Bern& and A L Balloh, C/zem Commun (1970) 136 Coord
Chern Rev
8 (1972)
223