Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-and-thrust belts: From model to nature

Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-and-thrust belts: From model to nature

Journal Pre-proof Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-and-thrust belts: From model to nature Sreetama Roy, Santanu Bose, Puspendu Saha PII: ...

6MB Sizes 0 Downloads 43 Views

Journal Pre-proof Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-and-thrust belts: From model to nature Sreetama Roy, Santanu Bose, Puspendu Saha PII:

S0191-8141(19)30339-6

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104012

Reference:

SG 104012

To appear in:

Journal of Structural Geology

Received Date: 16 August 2019 Revised Date:

4 February 2020

Accepted Date: 9 February 2020

Please cite this article as: Roy, S., Bose, S., Saha, P., Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-andthrust belts: From model to nature, Journal of Structural Geology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jsg.2020.104012. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Credit Author Statement S.B., S.R. and P.S. designed the research; S.R. and P.S. did the experiments. S.B. and S.R. contributed equally to the analysis of experimental results and writing the manuscript.

1

Spatial variations of ductile strain in fold-and-thrust belts:

2

from model to nature

3

Sreetama Roya, Santanu Bosea,b*, Puspendu Sahac

4 5 6 7

Department of Geology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata – 700019 Department of Geology, Presidency University, Kolkata – 700073 c Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032

a

b

8

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

9

Abstract:

10

Fold and thrust belts (FTBs) accommodate tectonic convergence through folding

11

and faulting of crustal rocks during a collisional event between two continental plates.

12

Although evidence of distributed deformation is common in FTBs that usually leads to

13

continuous foliations and regionally occurring ductile structures of multiple orders, it has

14

rarely been given much attention assuming the zones of localized deformation, like shear

15

zones and brittle faults, as potential locales for accommodating the amount of convergence.

16

This study presents 3D laboratory-scale models, using viscous thin sheet as crustal layers, to

17

understand the evolution of ductile strain in a tectonic wedge. We varied the degree of

18

mechanical coupling at the basal decollement (i.e., weak versus strong) to investigate this

19

issue at constant convergence velocity in all experiments to avoid the influence of rate-

20

dependence on viscous rheology. Our results reveal that the strength of basal decollement

21

controls the mode of wedge growth and hence, the strain pattern particularly towards the

22

hinterland. The weak decollement models yield a zone of constriction towards the central part

23

of hinterland, explaining the occurrence of isolated patches of L-tectonites and cross-folds in

24

FTBs; while the strong decollement condition allows gravity driven flow to be active in the

25

hinterland, leading to orogen-parallel recumbent folds. In contrast, both weak and strong

26

decollement models produce deformation that characterises the commonness of pervasive, 1

27

hinterland dipping ductile fabrics towards the mountain front. We correlate our findings to

28

show that spatio-temporal variations in basal coupling are responsible for varying occurrence

29

of ductile structures in FTBs.

30

31

Key words: Fold-and-thrust belts, Viscous rheology, Ductile structures, Constrictional

32

deformation, L- tectonites, Weak and strong decollement

33 34

35

1. Introduction: A fold-and-thrust belt is a long zone of deformed crustal rocks, formed by the

36

collision between two continental plates. A series of theoretical and experimental studies have

37

been carried out in the past three decades to understand the structural evolution of this

38

deformed crustal section (Tapponnier et al., 1982; Platt, 1986; Le Pichon et al., 1992;

39

Houseman and England, 1993; Lallemand et al., 1994; Willett, 1999b; Beaumont et al., 1999;

40

Mandal et al., 2009; Vanderhaeghe, 2012; Ruh et al., 2012; Jamieson and Beaumont, 2013).

41

These studies have considered varying rheology of crustal rocks from frictional-plastic

42

(Chapple, 1978; Davis et al., 1983; Dahlen et al., 1984; Malavieille, 1984, 2010; Mulugeta,

43

1988; Liu et al., 1992; Storti et al., 2000; Persson, 2001; Graveleau et al., 2012; Bose et al.,

44

2014b, 2015) to viscous (England and McKenzie, 1982; Emerman and Turcotte, 1983;

45

England et al., 1985; Houseman and England, 1986; Cohen and Morgan, 1986; Buck and

46

Sokoutis,1994; Ellis et al., 1995; Royden, 1996; Willett, 1999a; Rossetti et al., 2000;

47

Chattopadhyay and Mandal, 2002; Vanderhaeghe et al., 2003) and visco-elasto-plastic (Erdős

48

et al., 2015; Jaquet et al., 2018). The mechanical behaviour of crustal rocks is commonly

49

modelled by frictional plastic rheology that involves friction laws (Byerlee, 1978). Using the

50

theory of brittle failure, the laboratory models validated the concept of critically tapered

2

51

wedge model to explain the wedge-shaped geometry of mountain belts and the process of

52

sequential thrusting from hinterland to foreland (Davis et al., 1983; Dahlen et al., 1984).

53

According to this model, dynamic equilibrium within the wedges maintains a critical balance

54

between overlying gravitational load on the basal decollement and the tangential shear stress

55

along it. Using scaled laboratory experiments, a large number of workers have subsequently

56

shown that a number of parameters, like thickness of homogeneous sand layers (Liu et al.,

57

1992; Marshak and Wilkerson, 1992; Mandal et al., 1997), basal decollement slope

58

(Mulugeta, 1988; Saha et al., 2013; Bose et al., 2014b), and geometry of the indenter (Byrne

59

et al., 1988, 1993; Ratschbacher et al., 1991; Lu and Malavieille, 1994; Gutscher et al., 1996,

60

1998; Bonini et al., 1999; Dominguez et al., 2000; Persson, 2001; Persson and Sokoutis,

61

2002; Koyi and Vendeville, 2003) play a vital role in regulating the geometric evolution of a

62

tectonic wedge. All these models have shown that the frontal propagation of a wedge is

63

indeed punctuated by a series of sequential thrusts, splaying from the basal decollement.

64

Introduction of kinematic factors, like frictional resistance at the basal decollement

65

(Mulugeta, 1988; Liu et al., 1992; Lallemand et al., 1992; Gutscher et al., 1996, 1998; Mandal

66

et al., 1997; Konstantinovskaia and Malavieille, 2005; Saha et al., 2016), the rate of

67

convergence (Ratschbacher et al., 1991) and surface processes (Koons, 1989, 1990; Storti and

68

McClay, 1995; Storti et al.,2000; Konstantinovskaia and Malavieille, 2005; Hoth et al., 2006,

69

2008; Malavieille, 2010) have refined our understanding in predicting the spacing between

70

successive imbricate thrusts with horizontal shortening and influence of surface erosion on

71

wedge development. However, these models for crustal deformation using brittle theories

72

cannot explain the regional occurrence of penetrative ductile fabrics and associated folds and

73

boudinage structures in orogenic belts (Grasemann et al., 1999; Ring and Brandon, 1999;

74

Kassem and Ring, 2004; Law et al., 2004; Jessup et al., 2006; Xypolias and Kokkalas, 2006;

75

Larson and Godin, 2009; Law, 2010; Thigpen et al., 2010a, 2010b; Xypolias, 2010; Xypolias

3

76

et al., 2010; Cottle et al., 2015; Bauville and Schmalholz, 2015; von Tscharner et al., 2016;

77

Butler et al., 2019). The occurrence of penetrative ductile structures in FTBs thus implies a

78

significant role of an alternative mechanism, such as distributed ductile deformation during

79

the evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. The association of brittle and ductile structures

80

throughout the entire mountain belts indicates the crustal rocks to deform over varying time

81

scales, where fracturing and brittle faults develop mostly over short time scale (Sibson, 1982)

82

and large scale ductile deformation in the crustal rock takes place by creeping in long time

83

scale (Hauck et al., 1998; Schmid et al., 1996). Moreover, field investigations reveal that

84

geometry of ductile structures varies significantly from hinterland to foreland (Coleman,

85

1996; Carosi and Palmeri, 2002; Jessup et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2013). The frontal part of all

86

mountain belts is usually characterised by pervasive development of along-strike ductile

87

foliations, associated with upright to inclined folds, whereas the hinterland region is

88

dominated by complexly deformed fold structures that include interfering of fold types

89

(Murphy, 1987; Godin, 2003; Williams and Jiang, 2005; Culshaw et al., 2006; Williams et al.,

90

2006; Denèle et al., 2009; Kellett and Godin, 2009; Godin et al., 2011). A number of

91

theoretical and experimental studies have used viscous models for explaining the

92

development of such ductile structures in mountain belts (Buck and Sokoutis, 1994;

93

Medvedev, 2002; Chattopadhyay and Mandal, 2002; Lujan et al., 2010). Earlier studies have

94

even shown the crustal deformation to occur often in association with diffusion creep in

95

sediments at low temperature similar to viscous fluid rheology at large scale (Rutter, 1983;

96

Emerman and Turcotte, 1983; Wheeler, 1992).

97

In recent times, a number of mechanical models have been proposed to show the

98

contribution of ductile deformation in mountain building processes. For example, Bose et al.,

99

2014a showed that the influence of ductile deformation is crucial in the development of a

100

series of terrane-scale transverse structural domes in the eastern Himalayas. Their 4

101

interpretation on the development of complex fold patterns in the Rangit window of

102

Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya (DSH) is consistent with the mechanism of superposed buckling

103

of ductile folds (Ghosh et al., 1992). Moreover, Butler et al., 2019 have emphasized the

104

importance of buckle folding in predicting the geometry of subsurface structures in fold-and-

105

thrust belts. Besides widespread occurrence of common ductile structures, many FTBs also

106

exhibit patchy occurrences of L-tectonites or L>S tectonites towards the hinterland (Flinn,

107

1956, 1958, 1959; Hossack, 1968; Chapman et al., 1979; Holst and Fossen, 1987; Sylvester

108

and Janecky, 1988; Passchier et al., 1997; Braathen et al., 2000; Poli and Oliver, 2001;

109

Piazolo et al., 2004; Sullivan, 2006, 2013). L-tectonites are generally considered as an

110

expression of pure constrictional strain field (Treagus and Treagus, 1981, Ramsay and Huber,

111

1983; Ghosh et al., 1995). However, it is not clear how the constrictional strain field evolves

112

in fold-and-thrust belts in the framework of collisional setting under unidirectional stress

113

field. In addition, reports of cross folds and transverse ductile fabrics from many FTBs (Glen

114

and Walsche, 1999; Bell et al., 2004; Little, 2004) further substantiate the relevance of the

115

development of contractional strain field orthogonal to the bulk shortening direction in a

116

collisional belt.

117

Using laboratory experiments, this study reinvestigates the significance of the viscous

118

wedge model for explaining the occurrences of varying ductile structures in fold-and-thrust

119

belts. Our models demonstrate that constrictional strain field can locally develop towards the

120

hinterland of a growing FTB over weak basal decollement, leading to L tectonites and cross

121

folds. Strong decollement condition, in contrast, allows gravity driven flow to occur in the

122

hinterland, giving rise to the localization of orogen-parallel recumbent folds. Our experiments

123

suggest that both weak and strong decollement produce pervasive, hinterland dipping ductile

124

fabrics towards the frontal part of fold-and-thrust belts. Based on our laboratory experiments,

5

125

we conclude that distributed ductile strain has a strong control on the structural evolution of

126

fold-and-thrust belts.

127

128

2. Experimental Approach:

129

2.1

130

Material and Model Set up: We used a conventional sandbox-like deformation box (e.g., squeeze box under

131

normal gravity) as shown in Mulugeta (1988). The box was made of transparent acrylic.

132

Linearly viscous polydimethyl-siloxane (PDMS, manufactured by Dow Corning under the

133

trade name SGM36; see Weijermars, 1986 for PDMS properties) was chosen as a modelling

134

material to explore crustal flow trajectory in response to continuous horizontal shortening.

135

While the linear viscous PDMS used in our experiments greatly simplifies the modelling of

136

flow behaviour in heterogeneous crustal rocks, it provides considerable insights on internal

137

deformation within a viscous wedge. The viscosity of PDMS (5 × 104 Pas) is also suitable for

138

understanding the interaction of gravity flow in a collisional setting.

139

A rectangular PDMS slab of dimension (40 cm length, 25.3 cm width and 2.0cm

140

thickness) was prepared separately to simulate the undeformed crustal rocks in fold-and-thrust

141

belts. Four side walls and the basal plate of the deformation box were carefully washed, dried

142

and. then the lateral walls were coated with a weak lubricant before placing the PDMS slab

143

within the deformation box (Fig. 1). The weak lubricant was used to minimise the frictional

144

resistance along the interface between the PDMS slab and the inner walls of the deformation

145

box. The interface between the basal acrylic plate and the PDMS slab is considered as the

146

basal decollement surface. We performed two sets of experiments by varying the decollement

147

strength (weak or strong). The weak decollement was simulated by lubricating the basal plate

148

uniformly with a low viscosity (~ 4068 m Pas) fluid (See Supplementary Fig. S1) and strong

149

decollement was simulated with no lubrication on the basal plate. The viscosity of the fluid 6

150

was measured using a Cone-and-plate (CP-40, conical plate of diameter 40 mm and an angle

151

of 1°) measuring system in an Anton Paar MCR 92 Rheometer under laboratory room

152

temperature of 25°C. In all experiments we kept the piston speed (~ 1.97 × 10-4 ms-1)

153

constant to nullify the effects of rate dependence on viscous models. The model was

154

deformed by moving the vertical side wall (backstop), guided by a rigid piston connected to a

155

computer-controlled step-up motor, over the basal plate (Fig. 1). In our experiments, we

156

ensured the condition of constant volume of wedge material during the entire experimental

157

run and care has been taken so that no material can leak through the 1mm slit between the

158

rigid backstop and basal plate.

159

We analysed our model results in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system

160

(Fig. 1). During experimental run, the model was allowed to grow vertically along the X-axis.

161

The model-width (along the Y-axis) was kept constant in order to obtain the condition of no

162

rotation on the YZ and XY planes of bulk strain (Pfiffner and Ramsay, 1982). Hence, our

163

experiments were performed under bulk plane strain condition. In order to continuously

164

monitor the evolution of 3D strain pattern during the wedge growth, we stamped dry carbon

165

powder as circular passive markers on two surfaces (top surface and front lateral surface) of

166

the initial model corresponding to YZ and XZ planes. However, we could not monitor the

167

progressive change in strain pattern along the XY plane. In our model setup, the XY plane

168

(~backstop wall) is attached to the moving piston. The calculation of strain variations on the

169

XY plane were obtained from the strain ratios on YZ plane. It is possible because we ran our

170

experiments under bulk plane strain condition at constant volume (Bajolet et al., 2013). Two

171

digital cameras were positioned at a fixed distance to record progressive stages of

172

deformation for top-view and sectional-view (Fig.1) at regular preset time intervals during the

173

experimental runs. We then measured the displacement of passive markers by tracking the

174

successive change in positions of the material points using the ImageJ software. Using SSPX

7

175

software, strain maps for both XZ and YZ planes were computed from the displacement data

176

using the Grid Distance Weighted (GDW) method (Cardozo and Allmendinger, 2009). It is to

177

note that computed strain maps do not reveal the topographic outline observed on the XZ

178

section of the model because the GDW method uses a uniform grid spacing consisting of

179

square cells to calculate strain distribution in the deformed state (Cardozo and Allmendinger,

180

2009). Strain is calculated at the centre of each square cell using all the stations (i.e. using the

181

total number of passive marker points in our model). The individual stations are weighted on

182

the basis of their distance from the centre of the square cells by a specific weighting factor.

183

Moreover, it is essential to note that the GDW method of strain computation involves

184

calculation of strain on a surface that is either flat (slice) or on a surface that follows the

185

topography of the data. In our calculation, we computed strain at all stations (centre of

186

circular markers) in the deformed stage to obtain a first order strain magnitude for the entire

187

model length. Strain magnitudes are calculated based on the finite displacement between

188

neighbouring points, leading to either extension (positive) or contraction (negative).

189

190

2.2 Scaling of the model: The selection of analogue materials and modelling approach took into account the

191

necessity of ensuring proper scaling of our experiments with nature (Table -1). The ratio

192

between model length and thickness of 20:1 scales to nature in the order of 106. This implies

193

that an initial model length of 40 cm (

194

while the initial slab thickness (ℎ ) of 2 cm and width of 25.3 cm of our model correspond to

195

a crustal thickness (ℎ ) of ~ 20 km and a lateral extent of ~ 253 km respectively. The

196

rheological behaviour of analogue materials (PDMS) is governed by constitutive equations of

197

viscous flow, implying the importance of time for appropriate scaling of a viscous model to

198

its natural prototype. The convergence velocity (V ) of 1.97 × 10-4 ms-1 in our experiments

199

corresponding to the plate velocity (V ) of 3.1 cm/yr (De Mets et al., 2010; Argus et al.,

) represents a stretch of ~ 400 km in nature (

8

)

200

2011), leads to a strain rate ratio ( ) ~ 4.5 × 10-12, between nature and model and a time ratio

201

(

202

hour corresponds to ~23Ma in a natural system and an experimental strain rate (

203

4 -1

204

are scaled with natural prototype by considering a balance between the ratio of viscous force

205

and gravitational force as follows:

) ~ 2 × 1011. A time ratio (

) of 2 × 1011 in our experiment means that model run of one

s in our models approximately simulates the natural strain rate ( ) of 10-15 s-1. Our models

=

206 207

where,

,

,

,

and



---------------------eq.1



are the viscosity, strain rate, density, acceleration due to

208

gravity and length ratios between nature and model respectively.

209

As the ratio of gravitational acceleration (

210

( ) is an inverse of the time ratio ( =

211

) is 1 with negligible error and the strain rate ratio

), equation 1 given above is thus simplified as follows:



-----------------------------eq.2

212

From equation 2, the viscosity ratio (

213

of crustal rocks (

214

the order of 104 Pas.

215

) of 2 × 10-

) is computed to be 5.6 × 1017, such that the viscosity

) is in the order of 5.6 × 1021 Pas for a viscosity of model material (

) in

We also calculated the Argand number, Ar, as a ratio between gravitational stress (

216

and horizontal compressional viscous stress (

) from our deformed model width (w),

217

following Medvedev (2002) (Table -1). From our models of weak decollement (Fig. 2a), the

218

gravitational stress [

219

compressive viscous flow stress [

220

the wedge is ~ 56.285Pa respectively, leading to Ar of ~6.82. In case of models with strong

221

decollement, the value of Ar becomes ~ 8.42 corresponding to the gravitational stress [

222

965 kgm-3 × 9.8ms-2 × 8.78×10-2m] of ~ 830.324Pa and normal compressive viscous flow

223

stress, [

= 965 kgm-3 × 9.8ms-2 × 4.06×10-2m] is ~ 383.954Pa and normal = (5×104 Pas × 1.97×10-4 ms-1) / (17.5×10-2 m)] within

= (5×104 Pas × 1.97×10-4 ms-1) / (10×10-2 m)] of ~ 98.5 Pa respectively. Such 9

=

)

224

values of Argand number are considered to be relevant for describing force balance in

225

evolving orogenic wedges (England and McKenzie, 1982; Dewey et al., 1986; Cruden et al.,

226

2006).

227 228

3. Experimental results:

229

3.1 Weak Decollement

230

Rectangular PDMS slab of 2.0 cm thickness produced a crude wedge-shaped geometry

231

adjacent to the hinterland buttress after the model was shortened by ~ 3.3% (Fig. 2a). During

232

this stage of shortening (initial stage), wedge grew mostly vertically and thereby,

233

continuously increased the wedge elevation near the hinterland buttress. With continued

234

shortening for about 10.5%, the wedge elevation reached to 2.98 cm. At this stage, the width

235

of the deformed wedge became 8.3 cm with a surface slope (α) of the wedge around 10.15°

236

(Figs. 2a, 3a). However, further shortening of 5.9 cm (i.e., total model shortening = 10.08 cm)

237

increased the surface slope (α) by 2.65°, indicating decrease in the rate of vertical growth as

238

shown in Fig.3a. We designate this declining stage of vertical growth rate as intermediate

239

stage of wedge evolution. However, the decrease in vertical growth rate allowed the wedge to

240

propagate horizontally in the frontal direction during the intermediate stage (Fig. 2a). This

241

reflects a distinct shift in the mode of wedge evolution from initial vertical growth to

242

widening of the deformation wedge in the intermediate stage. However, it is interesting to

243

note that the maximum elevation of the growing wedge varied along the Y-axis of the model

244

near the hinterland buttress during the intermediate stage. The highest elevation of the wedge

245

was attained adjacent to both lateral walls (front wall and back wall), developing a trough like

246

geometry in the central part of the model (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig.S2). We anticipated the

247

cause of such variable wedge elevation to be the narrow dimension of the deformation box

248

along Y-axis of bulk strain. We then performed a second set of experiments with large model

10

249

width (35 cm), keeping the thickness of the initial model constant (2.0 cm). However, this set

250

of experiments also revealed similar topographic variations towards the hinterland (See

251

Supplementary Fig. S3), suggesting little or no effects of confinement on our first set of

252

model results (Souloumiac et al., 2012). We discuss the cause and implication of such

253

localized topographic highs near the lateral walls in section 4.2. Further shortening of the

254

model, in contrast, started to lower the wedge slope (α) (Figs. 2a, 3a). Our experiments show

255

that the entire amount of horizontal shortening was then used to increase the width of the

256

deforming wedge by complete cessation of the vertical growth. We mark this stage of wedge

257

growth as final stage of wedge evolution. The preceding discussion reveals that the horizontal

258

shortening of the model facilitates the wedge to grow continuously in the frontal direction

259

though the vertical growth of the wedge ceases after a threshold elevation near the hinterland

260

buttress. This observation from our experimental results is consistent with the occurrence of

261

low surface slope in natural fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., α has been estimated to be around 4°

262

for the entire Himalayan wedge, Avouac (2007), though our models had a horizontal

263

decollement in contrast to dipping basal decollement (Main Himalayan Thrust) below the

264

Himalayan wedge. Moreover, our experimental results also do not account for syntectonic

265

surface erosion, which would also be likely to lower the surface slope of a tectonic wedge.

266

Passive circular markers stamped on the XZ section immediately deformed into

267

ellipses near the hinterland buttress with the onset of model deformation. The long axes of

268

strain ellipses at the initial stage were oriented approximately normal to the basal plate i.e

269

along the X-axis of bulk strain. However, the orientation of their long axes underwent

270

anticlockwise rotation in the rear part of the model with progressive shortening, giving rise to

271

a zone of steeply inclined (>70°) strain ellipses (Fig. 2a). At this stage, aspect ratios of

272

ellipses also increased substantially. Strain maps from the XZ section distinctly reveal this

273

change in the magnitude of longitudinal strain from 2.05% to 29.7% in the hinterland with

11

274

progressive shortening (Fig. 2b). Strain maps in successive stages also show progressive

275

change in the orientation of extensional axis, corresponding to the major axis of strain

276

ellipses. The deformation of passive markers towards the frontal direction evolved by varying

277

inclinations of strain ellipses with depth. The amount of inclination decreased with depth,

278

developing an asymptotic trace of the long axes of strain ellipses (Fig. 2a). Such a depth-wise

279

variation in the inclination of strain ellipses towards the foreland can be compared with

280

previous theoretical studies on the evolution of viscous wedge (Pollard and Fletcher, 2005).

281

Passive markers on the YZ section (top surface), also deformed to ellipses near the

282

hinterland with the initiation of bulk shortening, where long axis of ellipses were oriented

283

along the Y-axis of bulk strain (Fig. 4a). The aspect ratio of strain ellipses varied between 1.1

284

and 4.9 during the initial stage of wedge growth (Fig. 4a). The increased rate of frontal ward

285

propagation of deformation during the intermediate stage of wedge growth is marked by

286

continuous increase in the aspect ratios of passive markers towards frontal direction.

287

However, at this stage (~26% shortening) the aspect ratio of strain ellipses near the hinterland

288

buttress stopped increasing (Fig. 4a). Instead, the aspect ratios started to decrease by

289

decreasing the length of the major axis of strain ellipses. This phenomenon of contraction of

290

the major axes became prominent when the model was shortened by at least ~38% (Fig. 4a).

291

With further shortening, a large number of strain ellipses transformed to almost circular shape

292

in the central part of the hinterland, indicating the development of a local compressional strain

293

field close to the hinterland buttress, along Y-axis of bulk strain (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, the

294

length of diameters of the new deformed circles decreased by 16% of the diameter of

295

undeformed passive markers in the initial model. Models with large dimension (40cm × 35cm

296

× 2cm) also yielded similar results (See Supplementary Fig.S3). However, the aspect ratios of

297

strain ellipses continued to increase towards the frontal direction with progressive shortening

298

for both sets of experiments (Figs. 4a, Supplementary Fig. S3). Strain maps from YZ sections

12

299

of this model distinctly demarcate a zone of overall compression (marked by dashed white

300

line in Fig. 4c) near the hinterland buttress, leading to the localization of overall

301

compressional strain field. Analysis of our model results thus suggests the relevance of

302

viscous wedge models for explaining the prevalence of patchy occurrences of L-tectonites and

303

cross folds in fold-and-thrust belts (Sylvester and Janecky, 1988; Passchier et al., 1997;

304

Braathen et al., 2000; Piazolo et al., 2004; Sullivan, 2006, 2013; Das et al., 2016), which

305

demand the existence of along-strike shortening during orogenic wedge growth. Our model

306

results show that the occurrence of orogen-parallel ductile fabrics towards the frontal part of

307

fold-and-thrust belts is consistent with the orientation of strain pattern revealed from our

308

experiments (Fig. 4c).

309

310

311

3.2 Strong decollement Strongly coupled decollement experiments developed a steep surface slope (α=31.61°)

312

during the initial stage of wedge growth when the model was shortened by ~ 10.76% (Fig.

313

5a). With increasing the amount of shortening (~34.9% i.e., ~14 cm of shortening), the

314

surface slope steepened further to ~37.84° over a relatively narrow wedge (~7.0 cm) (Fig. 5a),

315

However, the wedge height near the hinterland stopped increasing after reaching a threshold

316

elevation (8.36 cm) and further shortening (>35%) eventually lowered the wedge slope (Figs.

317

3b, 5a). However, the mechanism of lowering the wedge slope over strong decollement is

318

drastically different from that of the weak decollement experiments discussed in section 3.1,

319

where it was controlled by increasing the frontal propagation rate of the deforming wedge. In

320

contrast, the lowering of topographic slope for strong decollement is associated with lateral

321

flow of wedge material from the hinterland towards the foreland along the topographic slope.

322

It also hints that the frontal propagation of the wedge was not significant over strong

323

decollement. We also envisage the initiation of such lateral flow of wedge material as a 13

324

consequence of large elevation difference (~ 6 cm) between the hinterland and foreland over a

325

narrow (~ 7 cm) deformation wedge (Fig. 5a). The activation of material flow along the

326

wedge slope is distinct from the progressive rotation of passive markers on the XZ section,

327

where the dip of the long axis of strain ellipses near the hinterland continuously decreased to

328

become approximately sub-horizontal till the model was shortened by ~43% (Fig. 5a). The

329

development of a narrow wedge indicates that the amount of horizontal shortening was

330

largely accommodated by increasing the wedge elevation during the entire wedge growth. It is

331

to note that the maximum value of wedge height attained over strong decollement was

332

substantially larger than that developed over weak decollement experiments for an equivalent

333

amount of shortening (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the wedge height remained constant along the Y-

334

axis of bulk strain near the hinterland buttress in contrast to the varying wedge elevation over

335

weak decollement. This finding not only signifies a strong influence of decollement strength

336

on the mode of viscous wedge evolution, but also validates our model results with little or no

337

effects of lateral confinement in our experiments. Towards the frontal part of the wedge, the

338

passive markers on the XZ section were uniformly inclined towards the hinterland and

339

thereby, separated the hinterland segment from the foreland of a deforming wedge by a sharp

340

contrast in the orientation of strain ellipses (Fig. 5a). Based on our model results, we infer that

341

the presence of regional occurrence of low foliation dips towards the hinterland might be an

342

expression of a strong basal decollement beneath the fold-and-thrust belts. Additionally, our

343

experiments show that the orientation of strain ellipses in the upper part of the model wedge

344

started to rotate backward towards the hinterland after a significant amount of shortening

345

(>10%, Fig. 5a). According to our experiments, the mechanism of the back-rotation of the

346

strain ellipses is consistent with the occurrence of north-verging back folds reported from

347

orogenic hinterland of the Nepal Himalaya (Godin et al., 2011). Although our laboratory

348

experiments provide new insights on the evolution of ductile structures in fold-and-thrust

14

349

belts, scaling of topography in our models shows significant exaggeration compared to natural

350

prototype. We attribute this dichotomy to the absence of isostatic compensation in our

351

experiments, where models were deformed over a rigid basal plate for understanding the

352

mechanics of crustal deformation in orogenic belts. In addition, absence of surface erosion in

353

our experiments might have also played a role to increase the wedge elevation.

354

The strain maps computed from the displacement of passive markers on the XZ

355

section (Fig. 5b) revealed the progressive change in the magnitude and orientation of

356

extensional strain from hinterland to foreland with continuous shortening. The amount of

357

longitudinal strain increased from 22.7% (initial stage) to 135% (intermediate stage) in the

358

hinterland with progressive shortening. Further shortening, however, did not reveal much

359

changes in the magnitude of strain, but exhibited significant variations in the orientations of

360

extensional axis, particularly towards the hinterland. Interestingly, this change in the

361

orientation of strain ellipses is accompanied by lowering of wedge slope in our models (Figs.

362

3b, 5a). We attribute the combination of rotation of strain ellipses on the XZ section and

363

decrease in wedge slope to the activation of gravity flow in the hinterland. Finally, the

364

extensional axes near the hinterland became almost horizontal in consistence with the

365

orientation of strain ellipses after a large amount of shortening (Figs. 5a, 5b).

366

On the YZ section (i.e. top surface, Fig. 6a), deformation of passive markers showed

367

distinct differences in their orientation from that of the weak decollement (Fig. 4a). At the

368

initial stage, the long axes of strain ellipses (aspect ratio ~ 1.5) were oriented parallel to the Y

369

axis of bulk strain near the hinterland buttress (Fig. 6a). However, after a horizontal

370

shortening of 9.5% in the model, the former short axes of the ellipses in the initial stage

371

started to lengthen and eventually, transformed to major axis of the strain ellipses with

372

progressive shortening. Such a switch from minor to major axis of the finite strain ellipse

373

became evident when the amount of shortening was fairly large (32%). The computed strain 15

374

maps also revealed consistent orientation of extensional axes towards the hinterland with

375

increasing deformation (Fig.6c). In the finite model, the orientation of deformed passive

376

markers also developed two distinct zones of contrasting orientation of strain ellipses

377

corresponding to hinterland and foreland segments on the YZ- plane: (i) parallel to the Z- axis

378

of bulk shortening towards the hinterland, and (ii) parallel to the Y- axis of bulk strain

379

towards the foreland. Analysis of our model results from YZ sections thus led us to conclude

380

that the change in the direction of the long axis of strain ellipses must have resulted due to the

381

activation of the lateral flow of wedge material from hinterland to foreland (Figs. 6a, 6c). The

382

zone separating the two segments of contrasting orientation of strain ellipses on YZ section

383

fairly coincides with the intensely stretched zone of strain ellipses of very high aspect ratio on

384

the XZ section (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, this zone also marks the region of topographic slope

385

break on the XZ section. Based on above discussion regarding the distribution of strain

386

patterns on the XZ and YZ planes over strong decollement, we infer that localization of large

387

strain near the topographic slope break on the XZ section can be a potential site for large scale

388

thrusting event in orogenic belts.

389

4. Discussion:

390

4.1 Wedge topography

391

Our experiments described above show that the degree of coupling at the basal

392

decollement is an important parameter that regulates the first-order topographic evolution of

393

mountain belts. The ratio of vertical growth to horizontal propagation of a tectonic wedge

394

increases with increasing the degree of basal coupling. Our model results suggest that weak

395

decollement promotes a tectonic wedge to grow horizontally for a large extent, forming a

396

gentle surface slope (Figs. 2a, 3a). On the other hand, strongly coupled decollement leads to a

397

narrow wedge with steep surface slope (Figs. 3b, 5a). This variation in the development of

16

398

viscous wedge geometry at different decollement strengths corresponds well with previous

399

studies for varying Ramberg number, Rm (Medvedev, 2002). Higher value of Rm develops

400

wedges similar to weak decollement experiments, whereas lowering the value of Rm gives rise

401

to a narrow wedge with steep surface slope similar to our models over strong decollement.

402

Lowering the rate of frontal propagation over strong decollement allowed the wedge to grow

403

vertically at a faster rate towards the hinterland, resulting in variations in internal gravitational

404

potential due to a large elevation difference from hinterland to foreland. This lateral variation

405

in elevation eventually resulted in the initiation of gravity driven flow towards the frontal

406

direction. The onset of gravity flow has been clearly recognized by continuously tracking the

407

successive positions of passive markers on the XZ section (Fig.5b). The displacement vectors

408

showed a large vertical component in the initial stage of wedge growth, which in turn reduced

409

greatly with the onset of gravity flow. The reduction of vertical component was also evident

410

from progressive narrowing of spacing between successive flow vectors (Fig. 5b). The

411

influence of gravity driven flow in the formation of wedge geometry in our experiments is

412

consistent with earlier theoretical models (Copley, 2012). Furthermore, tracing the terminal

413

points of deformed passive markers, which were initially aligned horizontally in the

414

undeformed model, gave rise to a recumbent fold like geometry on the XZ plane with a

415

convex upward topographic profile (Figs. 5a, 5b). Knowing fully well that our experiments

416

are much simpler than that of natural deformation in FTBs, it provides an alternative

417

explanation for the development of orogen-parallel recumbent folds that are reported from

418

many fold-and-thrust belts. The development of convex-upward topographic profile similar to

419

our models is also not uncommon in nature, rather it shows strong consistence to explain the

420

bathymetric profiles across the Kurile, Ryukyu and Aleutian accretionary wedges (Emerman

421

and Turcotte, 1983). This study also revealed the crustal rocks to behave as a Newtonian fluid

422

similar to our experiments.

17

423

The geometry of viscous wedges discussed above over weak and strong decollement

424

show close resemblance to the geometry of brittle wedges at varying frictional resistance on

425

the basal decollement (Davis et al., 1983; Gutscher et al., 1996; Schott and Koyi, 2001; Bose

426

et al., 2009). This implies that the magnitude of shear stress on the basal decollement

427

essentially guides the development of first-order mountain topography, irrespective of crustal

428

rock rheology. The viscous wedge models, however, have provided much insights on the

429

distribution of ductile strain during the evolution of a tectonic wedge.

430

4.2 Analysis of internal strain in a viscous wedge

431

Our experiments on viscous wedge distinctly reveal the cause of spatially varying

432

ductile structures in fold-and-thrust belts. Although the formation of a viscous wedge is

433

phenomenologically similar for both strong and weak decollements described in many earlier

434

studies (Emerman and Turcotte, 1983; Rossetti et al., 2000; Chattopadhyay and Mandal,

435

2002), strain pattern within the wedge varies drastically with changing decollement rheology.

436

Our experiments under plane strain condition, show that uniformly weak basal decollement

437

condition may lead to along-strike variations in ductile structures towards the orogenic

438

hinterland. We discuss below how the kinematic condition at the basal decollement can

439

influence the evolution of ductile structures in fold-and-thrust belts.

440

The weak decollement experiments developed a self-regulating convergent flow in the

441

central part of the hinterland on the YZ section, resulting in continuous decrease in the aspect

442

ratio of strain ellipses during the intermediate stage of the wedge growth. The decrease in

443

aspect ratio transformed some strain ellipses even to circular shape (Fig. 4a). However, the

444

surface area of the deformed circular markers has been reduced significantly (~by 30%) from

445

that of the undeformed stage, suggesting the wedge material to stretch vertically along X-axis

446

in order to conserve the volume under plane strain. We correlate the significance of this

447

vertical stretching interpreted from our models as a probable mechanism for the development 18

448

of patchy L-tectonites in FTBs. Strain maps computed from the model results at successive

449

steps distinctly define a zone of overall compressional regime on the YZ section

450

corresponding to the occurrence of circular strain markers (Fig. 4c). Based on our

451

experimental results, we attribute this compressional zone as responsible for the development

452

of cross folds, L-tectonites and dome-basin structures documented from many fold-and-thrust

453

belts (Sylvester and Janecky, 1988; Passchier et al., 1997; Glen and Walsche, 1999; Braathen

454

et al., 2000; Piazolo et al., 2004; Bell et al., 2004; Little, 2004; Sullivan, 2006, 2013; Das et

455

al., 2016). Our experimental results thus seemingly contend the interpretation of orogen-

456

parallel ductile stretching in the Greater Himalayan sequence of the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri

457

Himalaya (Parsons et al., 2016). However, their analyses suggest that the orogen-parallel

458

crustal stretching in the Annapurna Dhaulagiri Himalaya must have resulted in a flattening

459

(oblate/sub-oblate) strain regime. The difference between our model results and natural

460

observations suggest that bulk plane strain condition might play a crucial role for localizing

461

the compressional regime towards the hinterland, leading to the formation of L-tectonites and

462

orogen-transverse ductile fabrics in FTBs. However, factors causing the plane strain

463

deformation condition in natural situation have still remained unclear, albeit the assumption

464

of plane strain condition has been widely used for understanding the evolution of FTBs at

465

large scale (Willett, 1992; Beaumont et al., 1992; Fullsack, 1995). Integrating our model

466

results and structural imprints in FTBs we envisage that along-strike rheological variations

467

(Jamieson et al., 2007) might constrain the deformation to occur under plane strain condition

468

in orogenic belts. In such situations, the laterally occurring relatively stronger crustal rocks

469

can act as lateral walls similar to our laboratory experiments. In addition, we also show that

470

laterally varying rheology of basal decollement can also lead to along-strike compressional

471

regime towards the hinterland above weak decollement segment (Supplementary Fig. S4),

472

giving rise to orogen-transverse ductile structures in fold-and-thrust belts.

19

473

In order to reveal better insights on the progressive evolution of three dimensional

474

strain state over weak decollement, we plotted strain ratio data of 495 passive markers in a

475

Flinn diagram to evaluate the progressive growth of tectonic wedges. Analysis of Flinn plots

476

at successive stages reveal that tectonic wedges evolve through spatial and temporal

477

variations in deformation. For example, at the initial stage, flattening strain governs the

478

development of ductile structures in the entire wedge (Fig.7a). However, with increasing

479

shortening, strain pattern changes remarkably from hinterland to foreland. The flattening

480

strain, however, continued to control the deformation in the frontal part of the wedge (Fig.

481

7c), whereas the hinterland part of the wedge shows the development of localized

482

constrictional strain field (Fig. 7b). Based on our model results over weak decollement, we

483

provide a generalised 3D structure of wedge geometry to show the characteristic strain pattern

484

variations from hinterland to foreland in figure 8.

485

We also investigated the incremental evolution of strain pattern from our model results

486

(Fig. 9) by adopting the protocol described by previous workers (Fischer and Keating, 2005;

487

Cardozo and Allmendinger, 2009). After a significant amount of shortening (>30%), the

488

strain maps at successive incremental steps show marked differences in the strain pattern in

489

the central zone of compression, compared to the strain maps computed from finite strain

490

(Figs. 4c, 9). For example, Fig. 9d clearly reveals that the compressional zone partly

491

transformed to extensional regime, close to the hinterland buttress. Further increments of bulk

492

shortening converted the entire zone of compression as in Fig. 9c to a zone of extension (Fig.

493

9e). Interestingly, the orientations of extension axes within the transformed zone are found to

494

orient along the direction of bulk shortening, i.e. parallel to Z-axis. This observation further

495

validates the localization of convergent flow along the Y-axis of bulk strain in our models.

496

Based on our model results, we attribute the dissimilarity between the finite and incremental

497

strain maps to the mode of convergence in fold-and-thrust belts. The strain maps computed

20

498

from finite strain (Fig. 4c) represent a collisional setting of continuous convergence,

499

developing the strong compressional regime towards the hinterland, whereas incremental

500

strain maps indicate the evidence of intermittent breaks during the convergence between two

501

continental plates. The above discussion thus suggests that segmented episodes of

502

convergence in collisional belts may play a crucial role in the localization of cross folds and

503

orogen-transverse ductile fabrics in FTBs (Glen and Walsche, 1999; Bell et al., 2004; Little,

504

2004). The gradual change of compressional strain field to extensional regime further builds a

505

coherent reasoning to explain why L-tectonites are rare in fold-and-thrust belts.

506

For strongly coupled basal decollement, the attainment of steep wedge slope (~

507

32.48°) set the wedge to deform internally under the action of gravity and thereby, rotated the

508

earlier steeply dipping strain ellipses to become almost sub-horizontal on the XZ-plane

509

towards the hinterland (Figs. 5a, 5b). The evidence of gravity flow is also distinct from the

510

orientation of strain ellipses (parallel to the direction of bulk shortening) in the hinterland

511

zone of YZ- section (Fig. 6a). However, alignments of strain ellipses towards the foreland on

512

both XZ and YZ sections indicates relatively weak or no influence of gravity driven flow

513

(Figs. 5a, 6a). Based on our experiments, we infer that the phenomenon of episodic

514

gravitational collapse and spreading of overlying crustal rocks in the Nepal Himalaya

515

described by previous workers (Bell and Sapkota, 2012) is likely to have occurred when the

516

rheology of the MHT (basal decollement) below the Nepal Himalaya was relatively strong.

517

The deformation of strain markers on the XZ section in experiments over strong decollement

518

(Fig. 5b) suggest that the gravity driven flow can be responsible for the development of

519

orogen-parallel recumbent folds in fold-and-thrust belts (Valdiya, 1981; Coward et al., 1982,

520

1988; Brun et al., 1985; Searle and Rex, 1989; Jain and Manickavasagam, 1993; Godin, 2003;

521

Banerjee et al., 2015). Moreover, based on our analogue models over strong decollement we

522

predict that occurrence of recumbent fold zone in fold-and-thrust belts can be considered as a

21

523

separator between the foreland and hinterland. Earlier studies also ascribed the influence of

524

gravity driven flow in building the architecture of orogenic belts (Copley, 2012). Flinn plots

525

from the deformed models show that deformation of tectonic wedge over strongly coupled

526

decollement is entirely governed by flattening type of deformation (Fig. 10).

527

4.3 Implications on Himalayan fold-and-thrust belts

528

This study has significant implications in interpreting the development of ductile

529

structures and first-order topographic evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. Geological records

530

suggest that fold-and-thrust belts are characterised by penetrative ductile foliations and

531

associated buckle folds of multiple orders. In Himalayan tectonics, multi-ordered folds have

532

recently been reported from the Darjeeling-Sikkim section of the eastern Himalaya (Bose et

533

al., 2014a). Their studies have advocated the concept of superposed buckling as responsible

534

for the development of multi-ordered dome-basin structures. In a recent study, Das et al.,

535

2016 reported the presence of L-tectonites in the hanging wall rocks (e.g., Lingtse granite) of

536

Main Central Thrust (MCT) from the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya (DSH). Strain analysis

537

from our weak decollement experiments relate the development of these L-tectonites towards

538

the extreme hinterland of the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalayan wedge during the intermediate

539

stage of the wedge growth in response to Indo-Asia collisional event and subsequently

540

transported southward to the present location during the MCT thrusting. Combining our

541

experimental findings and field structures described from DSH it appears that the Main

542

Himalayan Thrust (basal decollement) beneath the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalayan wedge was

543

relatively weak, resulting in the development of cross folds, L-tectonites and dome-basin

544

structures. Although L-tectonites are rare in the Himalayan belts, there are reports of patchy

545

occurrences of L-tectonites from NW Himalaya (Singh and Thakur, 2001; Dipietro and

546

Pogue, 2004). Recently, we also recorded isolated patch of L-tectonites in the high grade

547

rocks of Arunachal Himalaya (N 28° 23.485', E 095° 55.363'). The spatially varying 22

548

occurrence of Himalayan L-tectonites is consistent with the localization of patchy

549

constrictional strain field in our experimental models over weak decollement (Fig. 4).

550

Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya also witnessed the development of multi-ordered

551

recumbent folds (Banerjee et al., 2015). According to our experimental results, gravity driven

552

flow over strong decollement plays a role in developing recumbent folds in tectonic wedges.

553

However, co-existence of dome-basin structure (Bose et al., 2014a), L-tectonites (Das et al.,

554

2016) and orogen-parallel recumbent folds (Bose et al., 2014a, Banerjee et al., 2015) in the

555

DSH reflects temporal variations in the MHT rheology (decollement strength) beneath the

556

Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya during the evolution of Himalayan fold-and-thrust belts. On the

557

west of DSH, the evidences of north-verging folds at shallow crustal level (Godin et al., 2011)

558

and gravitational collapse towards the hinterland of the Central Nepal (Bell and Sapkota,

559

2012) indicate the Himalayan wedge to grow over relatively stronger MHT. These findings

560

not only reconcile our experimental studies with laterally varying ductile structures of

561

Himalayan belts, but also provide a strong basis for understanding the cause of along-strike

562

variations of topography and seismic activities in the Himalayan wedge (Singer et al., 2017;

563

Bai et al., 2019).

564

5. Conclusion:

565

This study provides an analysis of three-dimensional strain pattern for explaining the

566

cause of spatially varying ductile structures in fold-and-thrust belts. The recognition of

567

systematic variations in ductile structures across the orogenic belts is useful for gaining first-

568

order understanding on the rheology of basal decollement during the growth of mountain

569

belts. Development of isolated patches of L-tectonites and cross-folds in orogenic hinterland

570

signify either laterally varying crustal rheology or decollement strength in fold-and-thrust

571

belts. Our models over strong decollement show that localization of gravity driven flow in the

23

572

hinterland may lead to orogen-parallel recumbent folds in fold-and-thrust belts. The

573

development of pervasive, hinterland dipping ductile fabric in the frontal part of fold-and-

574

thrust belts indicates overall flattening type of deformation for both weak and strong basal

575

decollements.

576

577

578

Acknowledgements We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and Joao Hippertt

579

for editorial handling. SB acknowledge financial supports from the project funded by SERB,

580

Government of India, (Project No. EMR/2015/000910). SR received the Inspire fellowship

581

(No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160071) for doctoral research and PS acknowledge

582

the postdoctoral research project (No. F.4-2/2006(BSR)/ES/17-18/0035), funded by UGC.

583

584

References:

585

Argus, D. F., Gordon, R. G., DeMets, C. (2011). Geologically current motion of 56 plates

586

relative to the no‐net‐rotation reference frame. Geochemistry, Geophysics,

587

Geosystems, 12(11).

588

Avouac, J. P. (2008). Dynamic processes in extensional and compressional settings-mountain

589

building: from earthquakes to geological deformation. Treatise on geophysics, 6, 377-

590

439.

591

Bai, L., Klemperer, S. L., Mori, J., Karplus, M. S., Ding, L., Liu, H., Dhakal, S. (2019).

592

Lateral variation of the Main Himalayan Thrust controls the rupture length of the 2015

593

Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. Science Advances, 5(6), eaav0723.

24

594 595

596 597

598

Bajolet, F., Replumaz, A., Lainé, R. (2013). Orocline and syntaxes formation during subduction and collision. Tectonics, 32(5), 1529-1546. Banerjee, S., Matin, A., Mukul, M. (2015). Overburden-induced flattening structure in the Himalaya: mechanism and implication. Current Science, 1814-1821. Bauville, A., Schmalholz, S. M. (2015). Transition from thin-to thick-skinned tectonics and

599

consequences for nappe formation: Numerical simulations and applications to the

600

Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland. Tectonophysics, 665, 101-117.

601

Beaumont, C., Ellis, S., Pfiffner, A. (1999). Dynamics of sediment subduction‐accretion at

602

convergent margins: Short‐term modes, long‐term deformation, and tectonic

603

implications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B8), 17573-17601.

604 605

Beaumont, C., Fullsack, P., & Hamilton, J. (1992). Erosional control of active compressional orogens. In Thrust tectonics (pp. 1-18). Springer, Dordrecht.

606

Bell, T. H., Ham, A. P., & Kim, H. S. (2004). Partitioning of deformation along an orogen

607

and its effects on porphyroblast growth during orogenesis. Journal of Structural

608

Geology, 26(5), 825-845.

609

Bell, T. H., Sapkota, J. (2012). Episodic gravitational collapse and migration of the mountain

610

chain during orogenic roll‐on in the Himalayas. Journal of Metamorphic

611

Geology, 30(7), 651-666.

612 613

Bonini, M., Sokoutis, D., Talbot, C. J., Boccaletti, M., Milnes, A. G. (1999). Indenter growth in analogue models of Alpine‐type deformation. Tectonics, 18(1), 119-128.

614

Bose, S., Mandal, N., Acharyya, S. K., Ghosh, S., Saha, P. (2014a). Orogen-transverse

615

tectonic window in the Eastern Himalayan fold belt: A superposed buckling

616

model. Journal of Structural Geology, 66, 24-41. 25

617

Bose, S., Mandal, N., Mukhopadhyay, D. K., Mishra, P. (2009). An unstable kinematic state

618

of the Himalayan tectonic wedge: Evidence from experimental thrust-spacing

619

patterns. Journal of Structural Geology, 31(1), 83-91.

620

Bose, S., Mandal, N., Saha, P., Sarkar, S., Lithgow-Bertelloni, C. (2014b). Thrust initiation

621

and its control on tectonic wedge geometry: An insight from physical and numerical

622

models. Journal of Structural Geology, 67, 37-49.

623

Bose, S., Saha, P., Mori, J. J., Rowe, C., Ujiie, K., Chester, F. M., Kirkpatrick, J. (2015).

624

Deformation structures in the frontal prism near the Japan Trench: Insights from

625

sandbox models. Journal of Geodynamics, 89, 29-38.

626

Braathen, A., Nordgulen, Ø., Osmundsen, P. T., Andersen, T. B., Solli, A., Roberts, D.

627

(2000). Devonian, orogen-parallel, opposed extension in the Central Norwegian

628

Caledonides. Geology, 28(7), 615-618.

629 630

631 632

633

Brun, J. P., Burg, J. P., Ming, C. G. (1985). Strain trajectories above the Main Central thrust (Himalaya) in southern Tibet. Nature, 313(6001), 388. Buck, W. R., Sokoutis, D. (1994). Analogue model of gravitational collapse and surface extension during continental convergence. Nature, 369(6483), 737. Butler, R. W., Bond, C. E., Cooper, M. A., Watkins, H. (2019). Fold–thrust structures–where

634

have all the buckles gone?. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 487,

635

SP487-7.

636

Byerlee, J. (1978). Friction of rocks: Pure and Applied Geophysics. V, 116, 615-626.

637

Byrne, D. E., Davis, D. M., Sykes, L. R. (1988). Loci and maximum size of thrust

638

earthquakes and the mechanics of the shallow region of subduction

639

zones. Tectonics, 7(4), 833-857.

26

640 641 642 643

Byrne, D. E., Wang, W. H., Davis, D. M. (1993). Mechanical role of backstops in the growth of forearcs. Tectonics, 12(1), 123-144. Cardozo, N., Allmendinger, R. W. (2009). SSPX: A program to compute strain from displacement/velocity data. Computers Geosciences, 35(6), 1343-1357.

644

Carosi, R., Palmeri, R. (2002). Orogen-parallel tectonic transport in the Variscan belt of

645

northeastern Sardinia (Italy): implications for the exhumation of medium-pressure

646

metamorphic rocks. Geological Magazine, 139(5), 497-511.

647

Chapman, T. J., Milton, N. J., Williams, G. D. (1979). Shape fabric variations in deformed

648

conglomerates at the base of the Laksefjord Nappe, Norway. Journal of the Geological

649

Society, 136(6), 683-691.

650 651 652

Chapple, W. M. (1978). Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 89(8), 1189-1198. Chattopadhyay, A., Mandal, N. (2002). Progressive changes in strain patterns and fold styles

653

in a deforming ductile orogenic wedge: an experimental study. Journal of

654

Geodynamics, 33(3), 353-376.

655

Cohen, S. C., Morgan, R. C. (1986). Intraplate deformation due to continental collisions: a

656

numerical study of deformation in a thin viscous sheet. Tectonophysics, 132(1-3), 247-

657

259.

658 659

660 661

Coleman, M. E. (1996). Orogen-parallel and orogen-perpendicular extension in the central Nepalese Himalayas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 108(12), 1594-1607. Copley, A. (2012). The formation of mountain range curvature by gravitational spreading. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 351, 208-214.

27

662

Cottle, J. M., Larson, K. P., Kellett, D. A. (2015). How does the mid-crust accommodate

663

deformation in large, hot collisional orogens? A review of recent research in the

664

Himalayan orogen. Journal of Structural Geology, 78, 119-133.

665

Coward, M. P., Butler, R. W. H., Chambers, A. F., Graham, R. H., Izatt, C. N., Khan, M. A.,

666

Williams, M. P. (1988). Folding and imbrication of the Indian crust during Himalayan

667

collision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A,

668

Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 326(1589), 89-116.

669 670

671

Coward, M. P., Jan, M. Q., Rex, D., Tarney, J., Thirlwall, M., Windley, B. F. (1982). Structural evolution of a crustal section in the western Himalaya. Nature, 295(5844), 22. Cruden, A. R., Nasseri, M. H., Pysklywec, R. (2006). Surface topography and internal strain

672

variation in wide hot orogens from three-dimensional analogue and two-dimensional

673

numerical vice models. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 253(1), 79-

674

104.

675 676 677

Culshaw, N. G., Beaumont, C., Jamieson, R. A. (2006). The orogenic superstructureinfrastructure concept: Revisited, quantified, and revived. Geology, 34(9), 733-736. Dahlen, F. A., Suppe, J., Davis, D. (1984). Mechanics of fold‐and‐thrust belts and

678

accretionary wedges: Cohesive Coulomb theory. Journal of Geophysical Research:

679

Solid Earth, 89(B12), 10087-10101.

680

Das, J. P., Bhattacharyya, K., Mookerjee, M., Ghosh, P. (2016). Kinematic analyses of

681

orogen-parallel L-tectonites from Pelling-Munsiari thrust of Sikkim Himalayan fold

682

thrust belt: Insights from multiple, incremental strain markers. Journal of Structural

683

Geology, 90, 61-75.

684 685

Davis, D., Suppe, J., Dahlen, F. A. (1983). Mechanics of fold‐and‐thrust belts and accretionary wedges. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 88(B2), 1153-1172. 28

686 687

DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. (2010). Geologically current plate motions. Geophysical Journal International, 181(1), 1-80.

688

Denèle, Y., Olivier, P., Gleizes, G., Barbey, P. (2009). Decoupling between the middle and

689

upper crust during transpression-related lateral flow: Variscan evolution of the Aston

690

gneiss dome (Pyrenees, France). Tectonophysics, 477(3-4), 244-261.

691

Dewey, J. F., Hempton, M. R., Kidd, W. S. F., Saroglu, F. A. M. C., Şengör, A. M. C. (1986).

692

Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia—a young

693

collision zone. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 19(1), 1-36.

694 695 696

DiPietro, J. A., and Pogue, K. R. (2004). Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of the Himalaya: A view from the west. Tectonics, 23(5). Dominguez, S., Malavieille, J., Lallemand, S. E. (2000). Deformation of accretionary wedges

697

in response to seamount subduction: Insights from sandbox

698

experiments. Tectonics, 19(1), 182-196.

699

Ellis, S., Fullsack, P., Beaumont, C. (1995). Oblique convergence of the crust driven by basal

700

forcing: implications for length-scales of deformation and strain partitioning in

701

orogens. Geophysical Journal International, 120(1), 24-44.

702 703 704

Emerman, S. H., Turcotte, D. L. (1983). A fluid model for the shape of accretionary wedges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 63(3), 379-384. England, P., Houseman, G., Sonder, L. (1985). Length scales for continental deformation in

705

convergent, divergent, and strike‐slip environments: Analytical and approximate

706

solutions for a thin viscous sheet model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid

707

Earth, 90(B5), 3551-3557.

708 709

England, P., McKenzie, D. (1982). A thin viscous sheet model for continental deformation. Geophysical Journal International, 70(2), 295-321.

29

710

Erdős, Z., Huismans, R. S., van der Beek, P. (2015). First‐order control of syntectonic

711

sedimentation on crustal‐scale structure of mountain belts. Journal of Geophysical

712

Research: Solid Earth, 120(7), 5362-5377.

713

Fischer, M. P., Keating, D. P. (2005). Photogrammetric techniques for analysing

714

displacement, strain, and structural geometry in physical models: Application to the

715

growth of monoclonal basement uplifts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 117(3-

716

4), 369-382.

717 718 719 720 721 722

Flinn, D. (1956). On the deformation of the Funzie conglomerate, Fetlar, Shetland. The Journal of Geology, 64(5), 480-505. Flinn, D. (1958). On the nappe structure of north-east Shetland. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 114(1-4), 107-136. Flinn, D. (1959). On certain geological similarities between north-east Shetland and the Jotunheim area of Norway. Geological Magazine, 96(6), 473-481.

723

Fullsack, P. (1995). An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for creeping flows and its

724

application in tectonic models. Geophysical Journal International, 120(1), 1-23.

725

Ghosh, S. K., Mandal, N., Khan, D., Deb, S. K. (1992). Modes of superposed buckling in

726

single layers controlled by initial tightness of early folds. Journal of Structural

727

Geology, 14(4), 381-394.

728 729

730 731

Ghosh, S. K., Khan, D., Sengupta, S. (1995). Interfering folds in constrictional deformation. Journal of Structural Geology, 17(10), 1361-1373. Glen, R. A., Walshe, J. L. (1999). Cross‐structures in the Lachlan Orogen: the Lachlan Transverse Zone example. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 46(4), 641-658.

30

732 733

734

Godin, L. (2003). Structural evolution of the Tethyan sedimentary sequence in the Annapurna area, central Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 22(4), 307-328. Godin, L., Yakymchuk, C., Harris, L. B. (2011). Himalayan hinterland-verging superstructure

735

folds related to foreland-directed infrastructure ductile flow: Insights from centrifuge

736

analogue modelling. Journal of Structural Geology, 33(3), 329-342.

737

Grasemann, B., Fritz, H., Vannay, J. C. (1999). Quantitative kinematic flow analysis from the

738

Main Central Thrust Zone (NW-Himalaya, India): implications for a decelerating strain

739

path and the extrusion of orogenic wedges. Journal of Structural Geology, 21(7), 837-

740

853.

741 742 743

Graveleau, F., Malavieille, J., Dominguez, S. (2012). Experimental modelling of orogenic wedges: A review. Tectonophysics, 538, 1-66 Grujic, D., Hollister, L. S., Parrish, R. R. (2002). Himalayan metamorphic sequence as an

744

orogenic channel: insight from Bhutan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 198(1-2),

745

177-191.

746

Gutscher, M. A., Kukowski, N., Malavieille, J., Lallemand, S. (1996). Cyclical behavior of

747

thrust wedges: Insights from high basal friction sandbox experiments. Geology, 24(2),

748

135-138.

749

Gutscher, M. A., Kukowski, N., Malavieille, J., Lallemand, S. (1998). Episodic imbricate

750

thrusting and underthrusting: Analog experiments and mechanical analysis applied to

751

the Alaskan accretionary wedge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid

752

Earth, 103(B5), 10161-10176.

753

Hauck, M. L., Nelson, K. D., Brown, L. D., Zhao, W., Ross, A. R. (1998). Crustal structure of

754

the Himalayan orogen at∼ 90 east longitude from Project INDEPTH deep reflection

755

profiles. Tectonics, 17(4), 481-500.

31

756 757 758 759

Holst, T. B., Fossen, H. (1987). Strain distribution in a fold in the West Norwegian Caledonides. Journal of structural geology, 9(8), 915-924. Hossack, J. R. (1968). Pebble deformation and thrusting in the Bygdin area (southern Norway). Tectonophysics, 5(4), 315-339.

760

Hoth, S., Kukowski, N., Oncken, O. (2008). Distant effects in bivergent orogenic belts—how

761

retro-wedge erosion triggers resource formation in pro-foreland basins. Earth and

762

Planetary Science Letters, 273(1-2), 28-37.

763

Hoth, S., Adam, J., Kukowski, N., Oncken, O. (2006). Influence of erosion on the kinematics

764

of bivergent orogens: results from scaled sandbox simulations. Tectonics, Climate and

765

Landscape Evolution, 398, 201.

766

Houseman, G., England, P. (1986). Finite strain calculations of continental deformation: 1.

767

Method and general results for convergent zones. Journal of Geophysical Research:

768

Solid Earth, 91(B3), 3651-3663.

769

Houseman, G., England, P. (1993). Crustal thickening versus lateral expulsion in the Indian‐

770

Asian continental collision. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 98(B7),

771

12233-12249.

772

Jain, A. K., Manickavasagam, R. M. (1993). Inverted metamorphism in the intracontinental

773

ductile shear zone during Himalayan collision tectonics. Geology, 21(5), 407-410.

774

Jamieson, R. A., Beaumont, C. (2013). On the origin of orogens. Bulletin, 125(11-12), 1671-

775

776

1702. Jamieson, R. A., Beaumont, C., Nguyen, M. H., Culshaw, N. G. (2007). Synconvergent

777

ductile flow in variable‐strength continental crust: Numerical models with application

778

to the western Grenville orogen. Tectonics, 26(5).

32

779

Jaquet, Y., Duretz, T., Grujic, D., Masson, H., Schmalholz, S. M. (2018). Formation of

780

orogenic wedges and crustal shear zones by thermal softening, associated topographic

781

evolution and application to natural orogens. Tectonophysics, 746, 512-529.

782

Jessup, M. J., Law, R. D., Searle, M. P., Hubbard, M. S. (2006). Structural evolution and

783

vorticity of flow during extrusion and exhumation of the Greater Himalayan Slab,

784

Mount Everest Massif, Tibet/Nepal: implications for orogen-scale flow

785

partitioning. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 268(1), 379-413.

786

Jessup, M. J., Newell, D. L., Cottle, J. M., Berger, A. L., Spotila, J. A. (2008). Orogen-

787

parallel extension and exhumation enhanced by denudation in the trans-Himalayan

788

Arun River gorge, Ama Drime Massif, Tibet-Nepal. Geology, 36(7), 587-590.

789

Kassem, O., Ring, U. (2004). Underplating-related finite-strain patterns in the Gran Paradiso

790

massif, Western Alps, Italy: heterogeneous ductile strain superimposed on a nappe

791

stack. Journal of the Geological Society, 161(5), 875-884.

792

Kellett, D. A., Godin, L. (2009). Pre-Miocene deformation of the Himalayan superstructure,

793

Hidden valley, central Nepal. Journal of the Geological Society, 166(2), 261-275.

794

Konstantinovskaia, E., Malavieille, J. (2005). Erosion and exhumation in accretionary

795

orogens: Experimental and geological approaches. Geochemistry, Geophysics,

796

Geosystems, 6(2).

797

Koons, P. O. (1989). The topographic evolution of collisional mountain belts; a numerical

798

look at the Southern Alps, New Zealand. American journal of Science, 289(9), 1041-

799

1069.

800 801

Koons, P. O. (1990). Two-sided orogen: Collision and erosion from the sandbox to the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geology, 18(8), 679-682.

33

802

Koyi, H. A., Vendeville, B. C. (2003). The effect of décollement dip on geometry and

803

kinematics of model accretionary wedges. Journal of Structural Geology, 25(9), 1445-

804

1450.

805

Lallemand, S. E., Malavieille, J., Calassou, S. (1992). Effects of oceanic ridge subduction on

806

accretionary wedges: experimental modeling and marine observations. Tectonics, 11(6),

807

1301-1313.

808

Lallemand, S. E., Schnürle, P., Malavieille, J. (1994). Coulomb theory applied to accretionary

809

and nonaccretionary wedges: Possible causes for tectonic erosion and/or frontal

810

accretion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B6), 12033-12055.

811

Larson, K. P., Godin, L. (2009). Kinematics of the Greater Himalayan sequence, Dhaulagiri

812

Himal: implications for the structural framework of central Nepal. Journal of the

813

Geological Society, 166(1), 25-43.

814

Law, R. D. (2010). Moine Thrust zone mylonites at the Stack of Glencoul: II-results of

815

vorticity analyses and their tectonic significance. Geological Society, London, Special

816

Publications, 335(1), 579-602.

817

Law, R. D., Searle, M. P., Simpson, R. L. (2004). Strain, deformation temperatures and

818

vorticity of flow at the top of the Greater Himalayan Slab, Everest Massif,

819

Tibet. Journal of the Geological Society, 161(2), 305-320.

820 821

Le Pichon, X., Fournier, M., Jolivet, L. (1992). Kinematics, topography, shortening, and extrusion in the India‐Eurasia collision. Tectonics, 11(6), 1085-1098.

822

Little, T.A. (2004). Transpressive ductile flow and oblique ramping of lower crust in a two

823

sided orogen: Insight from quartz grain-shape fabrics near the Alpine fault, New

824

Zealand. Tectonics, 23 (2).

825 826

Liu, H., McClay, K.R., Powell, D., 1992. Physical models of thrust wedges, in: McClay, K.R. (Ed.), Thrust Tectonics. Springer Netherlands, pp. 71-81. 34

827

Lu, C. Y., Malavieille, J. (1994). Oblique convergence, indentation and rotation tectonics in

828

the Taiwan Mountain Belt: Insights from experimental modelling. Earth and Planetary

829

Science Letters, 121(3-4), 477-494.

830

Lujan, M., Rossetti, F., Storti, F., Ranalli, G., Socquet, A. (2010). Flow trajectories in

831

analogue viscous orogenic wedges: Insights on natural orogens. Tectonophysics, 484(1-

832

4), 119-126.

833

Malavieille, J. (1984). Modélisation expérimentale des chevauchements imbriqués:

834

application aux chaînes de montagnes. Bulletin de la Société géologique de

835

France, 26(1), 129-138.

836

Malavieille, J. (2010). Impact of erosion, sedimentation, and structural heritage on the

837

structure and kinematics of orogenic wedges: Analog models and case studies. Gsa

838

Today, 20(1), 4-10.

839

Mandal, N., Chattopadhyay, A., Bose, S. (1997). Imbricate thrust spacing: experimental and

840

theoretical analyses. In Evolution of geological structures in micro-to macro-scales (pp.

841

143-165). Springer, Dordrecht.

842

Mandal, N., Mitra, A. K., Bose, S. (2009). Orogenic processes in collisional tectonics with

843

special reference to the Himalayan Mountain chain: a review of theoretical and

844

experimental models. In Physics and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (pp. 41-65).

845

Springer, New York, NY.

846 847 848 849 850 851

Marshak, S., Wilkerson, M. S. (1992). Effect of overburden thickness on thrust belt geometry and development. Tectonics, 11(3), 560-566. Medvedev, S. (2002). Mechanics of viscous wedges: Modeling by analytical and numerical approaches. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B6). Mulugeta, G. (1988). Modelling the geometry of Coulomb thrust wedges. Journal of Structural Geology, 10(8), 847-859.

35

852

Murphy, D. C. (1987). Suprastructure/infrastructure transition, east-central Cariboo

853

Mountains, British Columbia: geometry, kinematics and tectonic implications. Journal

854

of Structural Geology, 9(1), 13-29.

855

Parsons, A. J., Ferré, E. C., Law, R. D., Lloyd, G. E., Phillips, R. J., Searle, M. P. (2016).

856

Orogen‐parallel deformation of the Himalayan midcrust: Insights from structural and

857

magnetic fabric analyses of the Greater Himalayan Sequence, Annapurna‐Dhaulagiri

858

Himalaya, central Nepal. Tectonics, 35(11), 2515-2537.

859

Passchier, C. W., den Brok, S. W. I., Van Gool, J. A. M., Marker, M., Manatschal, G. (1997).

860

A laterally constricted shear zone system—the Nordre Strømfjord steep belt,

861

Nagssugtoqidian Orogen, W. Greenland. Terra Nova, 9(5‐6), 199-202.

862

Persson, K. S. (2001). Effective indenters and the development of double-vergent orogens:

863

insights from analogue sand models. Geological Society of America Memoirs, 193,

864

191-206.

865 866

Persson, K. S., Sokoutis, D. (2002). Analogue models of orogenic wedges controlled by erosion. Tectonophysics, 356(4), 323-336.

867

Pfiffner, O. A., Ramsay, J. G. (1982). Constraints on geological strain rates: arguments from

868

finite strain states of naturally deformed rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid

869

Earth, 87(B1), 311-321.

870

Piazolo, S., Alsop, G. I., Nielsen, B. M., Van Gool, J. A. M. (2004). The application of GIS to

871

unravel patterns of deformation in high grade terrains: a case study of indentor tectonics

872

from west Greenland. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 224(1), 63-78.

873

Platt, J. P. (1986). Dynamics of orogenic wedges and the uplift of high-pressure metamorphic

874

rocks. Geological society of America bulletin, 97(9), 1037-1053.

875

Poli, L. C., Oliver, G. J. H. (2001). Constrictional deformation in the Central Zone of the

876

Damara Orogen, Namibia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 33(2), 303-321.

36

877 878

879 880 881

Pollard, D., Fletcher, R. C. (2005). Fundamentals of structural geology. Cambridge University Press. Ramsay, J. G., Huber, M. I. (1983). Strain analysis. The techniques of modern structural geology. Ratschbacher, L., Merle, O., Davy, P., Cobbold, P. (1991). Lateral extrusion in the Eastern

882

Alps, part 1: boundary conditions and experiments scaled for gravity. Tectonics, 10(2),

883

245-256.

884

Ring, U., Brandon, M. T. (1999). Ductile deformation and mass loss in the Franciscan

885

subduction complex: implications for exhumation processes in accretionary

886

wedges. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 154(1), 55-86.

887

Rossetti, F., Faccenna, C., Ranalli, G., Storti, F. (2000). Convergence rate-dependent growth

888

of experimental viscous orogenic wedges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 178(3-

889

4), 367-372.

890

Royden, L. (1996). Coupling and decoupling of crust and mantle in convergent orogens:

891

Implications for strain partitioning in the crust. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid

892

Earth, 101(B8), 17679-17705.

893

Ruh, J. B., Kaus, B. J., Burg, J. P. (2012). Numerical investigation of deformation mechanics

894

in fold‐and‐thrust belts: Influence of rheology of single and multiple

895

décollements. Tectonics, 31(3).

896 897 898

Rutter, E. H. (1983). Pressure solution in nature, theory and experiment. Journal of the Geological Society, 140(5), 725-740. Saha, P., Bose, S., Mandal, N. (2013). Varying frontal thrust spacing in mono-vergent

899

wedges: An insight from analogue models. Journal of earth system science, 122(3), 699-

900

714. 37

901

Saha, P., Bose, S., Mandal, N. (2016). Sandbox modelling of sequential thrusting in a

902

mechanically two-layered system and its implications in fold-and-thrust belts. Journal of

903

Geodynamics, 100, 104-114.

904

Schmid, S. M., Pfiffner, O. A., Froitzheim, N., Schönborn, G., Kissling, E. (1996).

905

Geophysical‐geological transect and tectonic evolution of the Swiss‐Italian

906

Alps. Tectonics, 15(5), 1036-1064.

907

Schott, B., Koyi, H. A. (2001). Estimating basal friction in accretionary wedges from the

908

geometry and spacing of frontal faults. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 194(1-2),

909

221-227.

910 911

912

Searle, M. P., Rex, A. J. (1989). Thermal model for the Zanskar Himalaya. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 7(1), 127-134. Sibson, R. H. (1982). Fault zone models, heat flow, and the depth distribution of earthquakes

913

in the continental crust of the United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of

914

America, 72(1), 151-163.

915

Singer, J., Obermann, A., Kissling, E., Fang, H., Hetényi, G., Grujic, D. (2017). Along‐strike

916

variations in the H imalayan orogenic wedge structure in B hutan from ambient seismic

917

noise tomography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18(4), 1483-1498.

918

Singh, K., Thakur, V. C. (2001). Microstructures and strain variation across the footwall of

919

the Main Central Thrust Zone, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Asian Earth

920

Sciences, 19(1-2), 17-29.

921 922 923 924

Souloumiac, P., Maillot, B., Leroy, Y. M. (2012). Bias due to side wall friction in sand box experiments. Journal of Structural Geology, 35, 90-101. Storti, F., McClay, K. (1995). Influence of syntectonic sedimentation on thrust wedges in analogue models. Geology, 23(11), 999-1002. 38

925

Storti, F., Salvini, F., McClay, K. (2000). Synchronous and velocity‐partitioned thrusting and

926

thrust polarity reversal in experimentally produced, doubly‐vergent thrust wedges:

927

Implications for natural orogens. Tectonics, 19(2), 378-396.

928 929

Sullivan, W. A. (2006). Structural significance of L tectonites in the eastern-central Laramie Mountains, Wyoming. The Journal of geology, 114(5), 513-531.

930

Sullivan, W. A. (2013). L tectonites. Journal of Structural Geology, 50, 161-175.

931

Sylvester, A. G., Janecky, D. R. (1988). Structure and petrofabrics of quartzite and elongate

932

933

pebbles at Sandviksfjell, Bergen, Norway. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 68(1), 31-50. Tapponnier, P., Peltzer, G. L. D. A. Y., Le Dain, A. Y., Armijo, R., Cobbold, P. (1982).

934

Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with

935

plasticine. Geology, 10(12), 611-616.

936

Thigpen, J. R., Law, R. D., Lloyd, G. E., Brown, S. J. (2010). Deformation temperatures,

937

vorticity of flow, and strain in the Moine thrust zone and Moine nappe: Reassessing the

938

tectonic evolution of the Scandian foreland–hinterland transition zone. Journal of

939

Structural Geology, 32(7), 920-940.

940

Thigpen, J. R., Law, R. D., Lloyd, G. E., Brown, S. J., Cook, B. (2010). Deformation

941

temperatures, vorticity of flow and strain symmetry in the Loch Eriboll mylonites, NW

942

Scotland: implications for the kinematic and structural evolution of the northernmost

943

Moine Thrust zone. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 335(1), 623-662.

944 945

Treagus, J. E., Treagus, S. H. (1981). Folds and the strain ellipsoid: a general model. Journal of Structural Geology, 3(1), 1-17.

39

946 947

Valdiya, K.S., 1981. Tectonics of the central sector of the Himalaya. Zagros Hindu Kush Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution, 3, pp.87-110.

948

Vanderhaeghe, O. (2012). The thermal–mechanical evolution of crustal orogenic belts at

949

convergent plate boundaries: A reappraisal of the orogenic cycle. Journal of

950

Geodynamics, 56, 124-145.

951

Vanderhaeghe, O., Medvedev, S., Fullsack, P., Beaumont, C., Jamieson, R. A. (2003).

952

Evolution of orogenic wedges and continental plateaux: insights from crustal thermal–

953

mechanical models overlying subducting mantle lithosphere. Geophysical Journal

954

International, 153(1), 27-51.

955

Von Tscharner, M., Schmalholz, S. M., Epard, J. L. (2016). 3-D numerical models of viscous

956

flow applied to fold nappes and the Rawil depression in the Helvetic nappe system

957

(western Switzerland). Journal of Structural Geology, 86, 32-46.

958

Weijermars, R. (1986). Flow behaviour and physical chemistry of bouncing putties and

959

related polymers in view of tectonic laboratory applications. Tectonophysics, 124(3-4),

960

325-358.

961 962

963 964

965 966

Wheeler, J. (1992). Importance of pressure solution and Coble creep in the deformation of polymineralic rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 97(B4), 4579-4586. Willett, S. D. (1992). Dynamic and kinematic growth and change of a Coulomb wedge. In Thrust tectonics (pp. 19-31). Springer, Dordrecht. Willett, S. D. (1999). Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B12), 28957-28981.

40

967 968

969

Willett, S. D. (1999). Rheological dependence of extension in wedge models of convergent orogens. Tectonophysics, 305(4), 419-435. Williams, P. F., Jiang, D. (2005). An investigation of lower crustal deformation: Evidence for

970

channel flow and its implications for tectonics and structural studies. Journal of

971

Structural Geology, 27(8), 1486-1504.

972

Williams, P. F., Jiang, D., Lin, S. (2006). Interpretation of deformation fabrics of

973

infrastructure zone rocks in the context of channel flow and other tectonic

974

models. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 268(1), 221-235.

975

Xu, Z., Wang, Q., Pêcher, A., Liang, F., Qi, X., Cai, Z., Cao, H. (2013). Orogen‐parallel

976

ductile extension and extrusion of the Greater Himalaya in the late Oligocene and

977

Miocene. Tectonics, 32(2), 191-215.

978 979

980

Xypolias, P. (2010). Vorticity analysis in shear zones: a review of methods and applications. Journal of Structural Geology, 32(12), 2072-2092. Xypolias, P., Kokkalas, S. (2006). Heterogeneous ductile deformation along a mid-crustal

981

extruding shear zone: an example from the External Hellenides (Greece). Geological

982

Society, London, Special Publications, 268(1), 497-516.

983

Xypolias, P., Spanos, D., Chatzaras, V., Kokkalas, S., Koukouvelas, I. (2010). Vorticity of

984

flow in ductile thrust zones: examples from the Attico-Cycladic Massif (Internal

985

Hellenides, Greece). Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 335(1), 687-

986

714.

987

988

Figure captions:

41

989

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of experimental setup. Inset showing initial model geometry with

990

reference to Cartesian coordinate system. Vertical and horizontal scale bars shown in diagram

991

are in cm.

992

Fig.2 (a) Cross-sectional view (XZ section) of successive stages of wedge evolution over a

993

weak decollement. Note that wedge slope gradually increased until the deformation of the

994

wedge reached the final stage of wedge growth. The final stage is marked by the onset of

995

decreasing the wedge slope (α) with continuous shortening. Corresponding line drawings for

996

successive stages are shown below. Dashed lines represent the traces of long axes of

997

deformed ellipses. The light shaded portion of the model marks the width of the deformed

998

wedge (also demarcated by a double sided arrow); while the dark shaded portion represents

999

the undeformed segment of the model. Vertical and horizontal scale bars are shown in cm.

1000

(b) Progressive evolution of particle flow trajectory (using the software Image J) and strain

1001

pattern (computed with SSPX software, using the Grid Distance Weighted method). Here

1002

each set of flow vector diagram (top) and strain distribution map (bottom) corresponds to

1003

successive stages of progressive shortening shown on the left in (a). Coloured vertical scale

1004

shows the magnitude of strain. Tm and Tn represent time in model and nature respectively.

1005

Fig.3 Graphical plots show evolution of wedge geometry (wedge angle and wedge height) as

1006

a function of horizontal shortening in experimental model over weak (a) and strong (b)

1007

decollements respectively. Schematic representative three-dimensional wedge models (not to

1008

scale) are shown for each stage of wedge evolution.

1009

Fig.4 (a) Top view (YZ section) of successive stages of deformation in experimental model

1010

over a weak decollement. Note that the distance between the strain markers along Y-axis

1011

decreased continuously adjacent to the hinterland buttress, giving rise to a zone of

1012

compression (marked by a white dashed line) and deformed circular markers are shown using

42

1013

red solid arrows. Using Grid Distance Weighted method in SSPX software, evolution of

1014

particle flow trajectory (b) and strain maps (c) are shown corresponding to the stages of

1015

deformation in (a). Note that compressional zone is also shown in strain map (c) by white

1016

dashed line. Coloured vertical scale shows the magnitude of strain. Tm and Tn represent time

1017

in model and nature respectively.

1018

Fig.5 (a) Cross-sectional view (XZ section) of successive stages of deformation in

1019

experimental model over a strong decollement. Note that wedge slope increased until the

1020

deformation of the wedge reached the final stage. The final stage is marked by the beginning

1021

of reduction in wedge slope with continuous shortening. Schematic line drawings of wedge

1022

evolution with progressive shortening are shown below corresponding to each stage. Dashed

1023

lines represent the traces of long axes of deformed ellipses. The light shaded portion of the

1024

model marks the width of the deformed wedge (also demarcated by a double sided arrow);

1025

while the dark shaded portion represents the undeformed segment in the front. Vertical and

1026

horizontal scale bars shown in cm. The two red dashed lines in the final stage mark the zone

1027

of high strain localization, indicating a possible location for large-scale thrusting. (b)

1028

Progressive evolution of particle flow trajectory and strain pattern (computed with SSPX

1029

software, using the Grid Distance Weighted method) are shown corresponding to deformation

1030

stages in (a). Note that the trace of the final position of the initial horizontally aligned dots

1031

produce recumbent fold geometry (marked by red dashed line in the final model) with

1032

increasing shortening. Chaotic alignment of extension axes in strain maps represent the

1033

undeformed parts of the model at different stages as indicated by negligible particle

1034

displacement in the frontal part of the model in each corresponding flow vector diagram.

1035

Coloured vertical scale shows the magnitude of strain. Tm and Tn represent time in model and

1036

nature respectively.

43

1037

Fig.6 (a) Top view (YZ section) of successive stages of deformation in experimental model

1038

over a strong decollement. Using Grid Distance Weighted method in SSPX software,

1039

evolution of particle flow trajectory (b) and strain maps (c) are shown corresponding to the

1040

stages of deformation in (a). Chaotic alignment of extension axes in strain maps represent the

1041

undeformed parts of the model at different stages as indicated by negligible particle

1042

displacement, as shown in (b), in the frontal part of the model. Coloured vertical scale shows

1043

the magnitude of strain. Tm and Tn represent time in model and nature respectively.

1044

Fig.7 Flinn plots for weak decollement: strain ratios correspond to the entire model (a),

1045

hinterland (b) and foreland (c) respectively. Separate plots in (b) and (c) estimate the nature

1046

and amount of strain partitioning within the hinterland and foreland at different stages of

1047

wedge growth. Initial flattening type of deformation in the hinterland region is transformed to

1048

constrictional type with progressive shortening in (b). The intensity of flattening increases

1049

with shortening towards the foreland (c).

1050

Fig. 8 Three-dimensional representation of deformed viscous wedge developed over a weak

1051

basal decollement. The deformed wedge is characterised by a low surface slope as revealed

1052

from XZ section of finite model. The XY section is characterised by undulating topography

1053

near the hinterland buttress (oblique view of three dimensional wedge model in

1054

Supplementary Fig. S2 distinctly shows the topographic variations). Note the region of

1055

topographic low between two lateral topographic highs adjacent to lateral walls (front wall

1056

and back wall), responsible for generating convergent flow along Y-axis of bulk strain

1057

(shaded area in the central part of the hinterland and marked by black arrows). Schematic

1058

representation of strain ellipsoids indicates the manifestation of spatially varying three-

1059

dimensional strain pattern from foreland to hinterland: flattening type of strain characterises

1060

the foreland and constrictional deformation localizes preferentially towards the rear part of the

1061

hinterland. Undeformed cube at the extreme foreland represents region of no deformation. 44

1062

Fig.9 Strain maps (using Grid Distance Weighted method in SSPX software) for successive

1063

incremental steps of top-view (YZ section) in model with weak decollement. (a) Development

1064

of compressional zone (marked by white dashed line) near the hinterland buttress in the initial

1065

stage of wedge growth, indicating the development of constrictional strain field. (b) and (c)

1066

Constrictional strain field (marked by white dashed line) persists during the intermediate stage

1067

of wedge growth. Note that extensional strain axes (black line) always run parallel to the Y-

1068

axis of bulk strain during the initial and intermediate stages of wedge growth. (d) Incremental

1069

strain map, showing reduction in surface area of compressional zone and development of

1070

extensional zone near the hinterland buttress. Note that extensional axes are now aligned

1071

parallel to Z- axis of bulk strain in the zone of extension (e) Incremental step showing the

1072

increase in surface area of extensional zone, (f) Complete obliteration of compression zone by

1073

extensional zone near the hinterland buttress. Change from compressional zone to local

1074

extensional zone near the hinterland buttress indicates increase in the intensity of convergent

1075

flow along Y-axis of bulk strain. Coloured vertical scale shows the magnitude of strain.

1076

Fig.10 Flinn plots for strong decollement: strain ratios correspond to the entire model (a),

1077

hinterland (b) and foreland (c). Note that, both hinterland (b) and foreland (c) are

1078

characterised by flattening type of deformation with increasing progressive shortening, in

1079

contrast to strain pattern over weak decollement discussed in Fig. 7.

45

Parameter

Units

Length of viscous slab ( ) Thickness of viscous slab (h) Convergence velocity (V)

metre (m)

In nature

In model

= 400 km = 4 x 105 m

Scale Factor= (Nature/Model)

= 40 cm = 4 x 10-3 m

= 106 (after Rossetti et al., 2001)

4

metre (m)



metre per second (ms-1)

V = 3.1 cm/year (after De Mets et al., 2010; Argus et al.,

= 20 km =2 x 10 m

2011) = 9.83× 10

-10

Pascal second (Pas)

Density of slab material ( )

kilogram per metre cube (kgm3 )

= 2700 kgm-3

Strain rate ( )

per second (s-1)

= 10-15 s-1



= 2 cm= 2 x 10 m

V

= 1.97 × 10-4 ms-1

-----------V = 4.9898×10

-6

ms-1

= 5.6 × 1021 Pas

Viscosity of slab material ( )

-2

(calculated)

= 104 Pas (Weijermars, 1986)

= 965 kgm-3 (Weijermars,

= 5.6 × 1017 (calculated from eq.2 in text)

=2.7979 ≈ 2.8

1986)

= 2 × 10-4 s-1 (calculated)

= 4.5 × 10-12 (calculated from the values of and V respectively)

Time (t)

second (s)

= 6.8493 Ma (calculated)

=1080 s (measured experimental run time)

Gravitational stress (

)=

Pascal (Pa)

--------------



Weak decollement [ = 965 kgm-3 × 9.8ms-2 × 4.06×10 2 m] = 383.954 Pa

= 2 × 1011 (derived from the inverse of )

------------

(calculated)

Strong decollement [ = 965 kgm-3 × 9.8ms-2 × 8.78×10-2m] = 830.324Pa (calculated)

Compressive normal viscous stress ( ) = V w

Pascal (Pa)

--------------

Weak decollement [ = (5×104 Pas × 1.97×10-4 ms-1) / (17.5×10-2 m)] = 56.285Pa

------------

(calculated)

Strong decollement [ = (5×104 Pas × 1.97×10-4 ms-1) / (10×10-2 m)] = 98.5 Pa (calculated)

Argand Number (Ar) =

Dimensionless

---------------

Weak decollement = 6.82 (calculated)

Strong decollement = 8.42 (calculated)

-----------

Table. 1 Scaling of experimental parameters.

X-axis

Camera 2

Z-axis Y-axis

d

e Fix

ll a w

Bac

kw

all

Pas

sive

Fro

nt w

all

2

ma

ll a rs e w p) l b ea ksto v Mo (Bac

rke

0

40 25.3

Camera 1

Motor driven piston 0

Strain in entire model

Strain at 3.8 cm (9.5% shortening)

Field of constrictional strain

Strain in foreland

Strain in hinterland in

tra

f

a pl

o ne

Field of constrictional strain

in

Field of constrictional strain

s ne

tra

s ne

in

tra

a

Li

ne

l fp

s ne

o

Li

Axially symmetric Field of flattening strain stretching

la fp Field of flattening strain

o ne

Li

Field of flattening strain

Axially symmetric flattening

in

Strain at 8.4 cm (21.0% shortening)

Field of constrictional strain

Field of constrictional strain

tra

s ne

a

f eo

pl

Axially symmetric stretching

Axially symmetric flattening

Field of constrictional strain

n

Strain at 12.8 cm (32.0% shortening)

e in

n

Li

Field of flattening strain

n

Field of constrictional strain

an

an

pl

f eo

tr es

of

pl

n

p of

Li

ai

Field of constrictional strain

ai

tr es

tr es

la

ne

ne Li Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

n

ai

Field of constrictional strain

n

la

p of

n

Li

n

ai

tr es

n

ai

tr es

an

f eo

L Field of flattening strain

pl

n Li Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Strain at 14.5 cm (36.2% shortening)

in

n

ai

Field of constrictional strain

n

la

ne

Li

p of

tr es

Field of constrictional strain

in

ne

a str

ne

Li

p of

Li Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Axially symmetric flattening

(a)

(b)

s ne

la

fp

o ne

la

Field of flattening strain

tra

Field of constrictional strain

(c)

3.3 % shortening

8.76°

4

35

40

30

25

20

15

10

(in cm) 0 510.5 % shortening

Tm=196 s, Tn= 1.25 Ma

4

10.15°

ETL

2

35

40

0

5

30

25

20

15

10

Initial stage

2

0

5 2

30

25

20

15

10 5 Deformed wedge

12.80°

25.2 % shortening

Tm=334 s, Tn=2.13 Ma

0

Intermediate stage

35

40

4 2

35

40

30

25

20

10

15

5

0

10

5

0

10

5

0

2

35

30

25

(in cm) 0 532.3 % shortening

15 20 Deformed wedge 7.35°

ETL

4 2

35

40

Tm=602 s, Tn= 3.84 Ma

30

25

20

15

4

Magnitude of strain

2

35

40

30

25

(in cm) 43.0 % shortening

20

Deformed wedge 6.11°

15

10

5

Tm=860 s, Tn=5.49 Ma

0

2

40

35

30

25

20

15 4

10

5

0

7.58 e-02 2.05 e-02

Tm=990 s, Tn=6.32 Ma (a)

35

30

25 Deformed wedge

20

15

2.42 e-01

1.31e-01

2

40

2.97 e-01

1.86 e-01

4

ETL

Final stage

40

10

5

0

(b)

Initial stage

Intermediate stage

Final stage

Initial stage

Intermediate stage

Final stage

x

x

z

z x

y

y x

z x

z

y y x

z

z

y

(a)

y

Wedge angle Wedge height

Wedge angle Wedge height

(b)

Initial stage 10 (in cm) 0 ETL

6.0 cm (15.00% shortening)

10 (in cm) 0 ETL

10.4 cm (26.00% shortening)

10 (in cm) 0 ETL

15.2 cm (38.00% shortening)

10 (in cm) 0 ETL

18.3 cm (45.75% shortening)

Tm =105s,Tn =0.67 Ma

Tm =271s,Tn =1.73 Ma

Tm =474s,Tn =3.02 Ma

Tm =715s,Tn =4.56 Ma

Tm =858 s,Tn =5.48 Ma

Deformed circular marker

10 (in cm) 0 ETL

(a)

21.0 cm (52.50% shortening)

Intermediate stage

2.5 cm (6.25% shortening)

Final stage

10 (in cm) 0 ETL

Tm =1001 s,Tn =6.39 Ma

(b)

(c)

Magnitude of strain

Tm = 264s, Tn = 1.68 Ma

Initial stage Intermediate stage

Tm = 68s, Tn = 0.43 Ma

Tm = 688s, Tn = 4.39 Ma Magnitude of strain

Final stage

1.35 e+00 1.07 e+00 7.88 e-01 5.07 e-01 2.27 e-01

Tm = 872s, Tn = 5.57 Ma (b)

0

-5.43 e-02

Initial stage 0

2.4 cm (6.0% shortening)

0

3.8 cm (9.5% shortening)

0

8.4 cm (21.0% shortening)

0

12.8 cm (32.0% shortening)

ETL

10

(in cm) ETL

10

(in cm) ETL

10

(in cm) ETL

Tm=282 s, Tn=1.80Ma

Tm=690 s,Tn =4.40Ma

Tm=900 s,Tn=5.75Ma

Tm=1080 s, Tn=6.90 Ma

Magnitude of strain

1.48 e-01 1.18 e-01 8.71 e-02 5.66 e-02 2.62 e-02 0 -4.28 e-03

10

(in cm) ETL

(a)

0

Intermediate stage

(in cm)

14.5 cm (36.2% shortening)

Tm=1188 s, Tn=7.59Ma

(b)

(c)

Final stage

10

n ne la

fp eo Li n

Field of constrictional strain

in tra pl

of ne Li

Li

Li

ne

ne

of

of

pl

pl

an

an

es

tra

in

Field of flattening strain

es

in tra es an

Strain at 10.4 cm (26.0% shortening)

Axially symmetric stretching

ai

n ai str la

fp eo Field of constrictional strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of constrictional strain

Field of constrictional strain

Li n

la eo

fp

Axially symmetric flattening

Li n

Axially symmetric stretching

Strain in foreland

ne

str

ai

n

Field of constrictional strain

ne

Strain at 6 cm (15.0% shortening)

Field of constrictional strain

Strain in hinterland

str

Strain in entire model

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Axially symmetric flattening

in tra

in tra es

an of

of

ne

ne

Li

Li

Li

ne

Axially symmetric flattening

pl

pl

of

an

pl

an

Field of constrictional strain

es

in tra

Field of constrictional strain

es

Strain at 15.2 cm (38.0% shortening)

Field of constrictional strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

tra in ne s

Li

Li ne

ne

of

of

Axially symmetric flattening

pl an

pl a

of ne Li

Axially symmetric stretching

Field of constrictional strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

Field of flattening strain

(a)

(b)

es tra

ne s

Field of constrictional strain

pl a

Strain at 21cm (52.5% shortening)

Field of constrictional strain

in

tra in

Field of flattening strain

(c)

Orogen transverse trend

x x y

Foreland

Hinterland

z

d

l

r

e all

og r O

e

a np

n tre

2.5-6 cm displacement (15.00% shortening)

(c)

6-10.4 cm displacement (26.00% shortening)

(d)

10.4-15.2 cm displacement (38.00% shortening)

Initial stage

(b)

Intermediate stage

2.5 cm displacement (6.25% shortening)

Final stage

(a)

Magnitude of strain 1.27 e-01 9.46 e-02

(e)

15.2-18.3 cm displacement (45.75% shortening)

6.22 e-02 2.97 e-02 0

(f)

18.3-21 cm displacement (52.50% shortening)

-2.68 e-03 -3.51 e-02

Research Highlights • • • •

Development of ductile structures in fold-and-thrust belts is sensitive to decollement strength L-tectonites and cross folds preferentially localize in a tectonic wedge over weak decollement Strong decollement leads to recumbent fold in convergent setting Hinterland-dipping ductile fabrics in the foreland correspond to flattening type of deformation

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.