Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy – A systematic review

Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy – A systematic review

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265 www.theijs.com Review Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy – A systematic review Umar Sadata,*, ...

149KB Sizes 0 Downloads 114 Views

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265

www.theijs.com

Review

Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy – A systematic review Umar Sadata,*, Osman Darb, Stewart Walsha, Kevin Vartya a Cambridge Vascular Unit, Box 201, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK b University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

article info

abstract

Article history:

Visceral artery aneurysm is an uncommon pathology, with a potential for rupture. Splenic

Published online 17 August 2007

artery aneurysms (SAA) are most commonly (60%) associated with a high mortality rate of 25% in case of aneurysm rupture. This increases disproportionately to 75% among pregnant women with fetal mortality of 95%. Although this is a rare event, because of the associated

Keywords:

catastrophic consequences, prompt management of splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) is of

Splenic artery

prime importance. This systematic review provides up-to-date information about the man-

Rupture

agement of splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy.

Endovascular repair

ª 2007 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pregnancy Aneurysm

1.

Introduction

Visceral artery aneurysm is an uncommon pathology, with a potential for rupture. Splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) are the most common (60%), followed by hepatic (20%), superior mesenteric (5.9%) and celiac (4%) artery aneurysms.1 SAAs are either discovered incidentally2–5 or in symptomatic cases when they rupture.6–8 The latter is associated with a 25% mortality9,10 which increases disproportionately to 75% among pregnant women with fetal mortality of 95%.9–11 The fetal distress and mortality usually results from hypovolemia, shock and their resulting consequences. Various anatomical and physiological changes occur during pregnancy, which can alter the presentation of conditions that require surgery making the diagnosis, evaluation and

treatment of a pregnant woman difficult. We present a comprehensive systematic literature review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment options of this rare and potentially fatal condition.

2.

Methods

Two reviewers did a comprehensive systematic English language literature search using PUBMED and EMBASE search engines independently. The search terms used were ‘‘Splenic artery aneurysm’’ and ‘‘Pregnancy’’. All related case reports, case series, review articles which were published between April 1976 and April 2007 were reviewed systematically.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ44 1223 245151. E-mail address: [email protected] (U. Sadat). 1743-9191/$ – see front matter ª 2007 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.08.002

262

3.

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265

Demographics

The true prevalence of SAA in pregnancy or women of childbearing age is unknown. This is because most of them are asymptomatic. The prevalence data in general population is also variable ranging from 0.1–0.2% in a large autopsy series12 to 10.4% in an autopsy series on patients 60 years or older with special attention given to the splenic artery.3 In a study of 3600 arteriograms the incidence was found to be 0.78%.13 Parity, however, seems to influence the incidence of SAA in women, being four times more common in multiparous women.8,14–17 A significant number of women are pregnant when the diagnosis is made probably due to augmented use of ultrasonography and use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging techniques.14 Two-thirds of aneurysms rupture in third trimester followed by second trimester ruptures.15,18

4.

Pathophysiology

The precise etiology of splenic aneurysms remains unclear. Different etiological factors attributed to aneurysm formation include angiodysplasia, portal hypertension, pregnancy, atherosclerosis, diabetes, intracranial aneurysm, polyarteritis nodosa, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency and infective factors.1,8,16,19 Among them pregnancy has a strong association with splenic artery aneurysm formation.1,19–21 Different mechanisms have been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis. Trimble and Hill’s proposals remain even valid today, when they suggested that aneurysmal dilatation of an artery results from two contributing factors: weakness in the arterial wall and increase in the blood pressure.22 In pregnancy, influence of hormones namely estrogen, progesterone and relaxin on the arterial wall plays a significant role. The first two hormones presumably result in histological alteration of the arterial wall mainly medial degeneration leading to aneurysmal dilatation.14,21 Histological changes that have been documented include sub-endothelial thickening, internal elastic lamina fragmentation, medial fibrodysplasia, and accumulation of acid glycosaminogylcans in both subintimal and medial layers.16,21,23 Microcystic degeneration23 and external elastic lamina disruption have also been reported, the latter in patients with portal hypertension.24 Relaxin may augment the effect of these hormones by further enhancing the elasticity of splenic artery as suggested by de Vries et al.25 In patients having portal hypertension, which can be concomitantly present in pregnancy, hormones like aldosterone and rennin have also been implicated to cause arterial wall thinning.24 Concomitant presence of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency can further increase the likelihood of aneurysm formation.26 Physiological changes during pregnancy also enhance the stress on the arterial wall. These include enhanced cardiac output, increased blood volume and portal hypertension.27 The collative effect of these changes is increased chance of splenic aneurysm formation and/or rupture in pregnancy. Other most commonly reported arteries to have aneurysm

rupture during pregnancy include aorta, cerebral arteries, renal, coronary and ovarian arteries.28

4.1.

Pathomechanics of rupture

The frequency of rupture increases in pregnancy and with associated portal hypertension,14 the former affecting 20–50% of women.21,29–32 Early reports of splenic artery aneurysm suggested the risk of rupture to be 10%,33 however, more recent data suggest rupture rates closer to 2–3%.15,17 The size of the aneurysm is usually more than 2.5 cm in most patients at the time of rupture,31 however, rupture of smaller aneurysms has also been reported.15,25,31 This rupture can be either sudden rupture or a two-stage rupture, which is present in 20– 25% of cases.15,25,34 The latter is characterized by containment of initial rupture within the lesser sac by either omentum and/ or blood clots that block foramen of Winslow.35 This is followed by free rupture into greater sac when the tension within the lesser sac increases. The clinical presentation is in the form of sudden initial abdominal pain with an intermediate stable time period followed by sudden collapse. There has been only one report in literature, which describes rupture of splenic artery into splenic vein in a patient with acute portal hypertension in the post-partum period.36

5.

Diagnostic features

The clinical features result from aneurysm rupture usually which is characterized consistently with sharp abdominal pain, either in the epigastrium or more often localized in the left hypochondrial area with associated pain in the tip of the left shoulder (Kehrs sign).37–39 This is associated with nausea, vomiting and sudden collapse. Abdominal tenderness can be elicited in cases of rupture though signs of shock are the most suggestive features. Abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) tracing is also witnessed in cases of advanced pregnancy.10,40,41 Fender and colleagues have reported a case in which clinical signs of rupture were masked by epidural anesthesia used during delivery.41 Richardson and colleagues reported a case of SAA rupture in pregnancy presenting in a manner similar to pulmonary embolism characterized by left sided chest pain, breathlessness, low oxygen saturation and ECG changes indicative of massive pulmonary embolus.42 Therefore, high degree of suspicion is required when making the diagnosis in pregnancy with confirmation usually made at the time of laparotomy. Placental abruption is one of the most commonly made misdiagnosis43,44; however, uterine rupture44 and rupture of other arterial aneurysms may share similar clinical features. The radiological investigations are quite helpful in making the diagnosis in both emergency and elective settings; however, their sensitivities and specificities remain unknown in pregnancy. Moreover, they should not delay the immediate resuscitation and control of the hemorrhage by emergency surgery. It should also be borne in mind that use of investigations that involve exposure of the fetus to radiations should be kept to a minimum because of the danger of teratogenicity.

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265

5.1.

Abdominal X-ray

Although it is not the first line investigative tool for SAA, abdominal X-ray carried out for some other abdominal pathology may reveal calcified SAA as characteristic calcified ring with a central lucent area to the left of the first lumbar vertebral body.45

5.2.

Ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography

It is preferable in pregnancy21 because it is non-invasive and cost effective. In emergency cases it usually reveals presence of free fluid in abdomen and the diagnosis confirmed at laparotomy. There are no contraindications to ultrasound procedures during pregnancy and this modality has largely replaced X-ray as the primary method of fetal imaging during pregnancy.46 There have been no reports of documented adverse fetal effects for diagnostic ultrasound procedures, including duplex Doppler imaging. However, its utility is limited by operator dependency, obese patients, bowel gas shadow and arteriosclerosis.47,48 The likelihood of missing smaller lesions is also quite high because of limited spatial resolution.49,50

5.3. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging Although contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are quite useful in improving three-dimensional evaluation of the splenic artery, readily distinguishing tortuous vessel from aneurysm, however, in pregnancy safety of the fetus has to be given due consideration while considering their use. There have been no documented adverse fetal effects reported, however, the National Radiological Protection Board arbitrarily advises against use of MRI in the first trimester.46 Similarly, teratogenesis is not a major concern after diagnostic CT studies in pregnancy, because the radiation dose is generally too low to cause such effects.51 However, intravascular contrast media should be avoided in pregnancy, in order to avoid any possible hazard to the fetus52 and should only be used if absolutely essential, and only after discussion of risks and benefits with the patient and referring clinician.

5.4.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA)

Though DSA is the gold standard for diagnosis of SAA, however, in pregnancy it is usually employed when concomitant radiological intervention like coil embolization or endoluminal stent deployment is to be performed.27,50 Nincheri and colleagues suggest transcatheter embolization or percutaneous embolization to urgently stop hemorrhage.53 To date no reports were found in literature where these treatment modalities were used in ruptured SAA in pregnancy. As far as safety of DSA is concerned, the above-mentioned rules for use of contrast media also hold true for DSA in pregnant women.

6.

Management

6.1.

Asymptomatic SAA

263

There is no consensus with regard to management of asymptomatic cases. But it is suggested that aneurysms that are larger than 2 cm should be treated.15,16 In pregnancy, minimally invasive techniques should be utilized which can be transcatheter embolization, percutaneous angiographic embolization or laparoscopic ligation or resection.53 However, appropriate treatment of SAA depends on location of the lesion, age of the patient, operative risks and clinical status.49 The preservation of spleen should be a consideration in the treatment of SAA.14 Aneurysms located in the proximal or middle third of the splenic artery may be treated with simple excision, with proximal and distal ligation of the artery and splenic preservation (through the short gastric vessels). For aneurysms located in the distal third, resection with splenectomy is most often performed, which is unfortunately the case in 70% of the patients with portal hypertension.17,54 The operative mortality is greater than 0.5% in elective cases.14 The use of embolization does significantly decrease the mortality and morbidity but data from long term follow up of these patients are not available and is believed to be less successful in 85% of the cases.8,53 When no pregnancy is planned and aneurysm is less than 2 cm, management options are inconclusive because the understanding of natural history of SAA is incomplete. However, in pregnancy proactive management of aneurysms less than 2 cm should be carried out.

6.2.

Symptomatic and ruptured SAA

In symptomatic cases, immediate treatment is warranted which can be open, laparoscopic or as embolization of the aneurysm.53 However, in cases of rupture, the aim is immediate resuscitation and cessation of bleeding, which is usually through caesarian section laparotomy. Splenectomy or splenopancreatectomy is usually employed in these cases with ligation of the splenic artery.5

7.

Conclusion

Although observant treatment can be adopted in aneurysms less than 2 cm in non-pregnant patients, however, keeping in view the catastrophic consequences of rupture in pregnancy, proactive approach should be adopted in women of childbearing age. More research is required in understanding the natural history of splenic aneurysms and their response to hormonal influence in controlled environment before a definite management strategy can be agreed upon in elective setting. In emergency settings, high degree of suspicion is required to make diagnosis of SAA rupture in pregnant females having sudden collapse with or without sharp abdominal pain. Immediate resuscitation and cessation of hemorrhage is essential for maternal and fetal survival. National health authorities should maintain their SAA databases for rupture and elective cases and report their results annually to further improve management strategies, and

264

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265

obstetricians should involve vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists as soon as they suspect SAA.

Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest.

Funding None.

references

1. Arabia R, Pellicano S, Siciliani R, Dattola OL, Giusti S, Terra L, et al. Splenic artery aneurysm and portal hypertension. Report of a case. Minerva Med 1999;90940:143–5. 2. Wagner WH, Allins AD, Treiman RL, Cohen JL, Foran RF, Levin PM, Cossman DV, et al. Ruptured visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1997;11:342–7. 3. Bedford PD, Lodge B. Aneurysm of the splenic artery. Gut 1960;1:312–20. 4. Moore SW, Guida PM, Schumacher HW. Splenic artery aneurysm. Bull Soc Int Chir 1970;29:210–8. 5. de Perrot M, Buhler L, Deleaval J, Borisch B, Mentha G, Morel P. Management of true aneurysms of the splenic artery. Am J Surg 1998;175:466–8. 6. Popham P, Buettner A. Arterial aneurysms of lienorenal axis during pregnancy. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003;12(2):117–9. 7. Jung SI, Joh YG, Um JW, Suh SO, Whang CW, Corbascio M, et al. The Seoul experience of splenic artery aneurysms. Ann Chir Gynaecol 2001;90(1):10–4. 8. Dave SP, Reis ED, Hossain A, Taub PJ, Kerstein MD, Hollier LH, et al. Splenic artery aneurysm in the 1990s. Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14(3):223–9. 9. Shahabi S, Jani J, Masters L, Cobin L, Greindl J. Spontaneous rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm in pregnancy: report of two cases. Acta Chir Belg 2000;100(5):231–3. 10. Caillouette JC, Merchant EB. Ruptured splenic artery aneurysm in pregnancy. Twelfth reported case with maternal and fetal survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1810–1 [discussion 1811–3]. 11. Hillemans P, Knitza R, Muller-Hocker J. Rupture of splenic artery aneurysm in a pregnant patient with portal hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(5):1665–6. 12. Babb RR. Aneurysm of the splenic artery. Arch Surg 1976;111: 924–5. 13. Arepally A, Dagli M, Hofmann LV, Kim HS, Cooper M, Klein A, et al. Treatment of splenic artery aneurysm with use of a stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002 Jun;13(6):631–3. 14. Mattar SG, Lumsden AB. The management of splenic artery aneurysms: experience with 23 cases. Am J Surg 1995;169:580–5. 15. Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Joyce JW, Hollier LH, Bernatz PE. Splenic artery aneurysms. Surgery 1982;91(6):694–9. 16. Abbas MA, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, Gloviczki P, Oldenburg WA, Pairolero PC, et al. Splenic artery aneurysms: two decades experience at Mayo clinic. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:442–9. 17. Stanley JC, Fry WJ. Pathogenesis and clinical significance of splenic artery aneurysms. Surgery 1974;76:898–909. 18. Sam CE, Rabl M, Joura EA. Aneurysm of the splenic artery: rupture in pregnancy. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000;112(20):896–8. 19. Abad C, Montesdeoca-Cabrera D, Saez-Guzman T. Review of two surgically operated cases. An Med Interna 2006;23(3):130–2. 20. Jorgensen BA. Visceral artery aneurysms. A review. Dan Med Bull 1985;32(4):237–42. 21. Selo-Ojeme DO, Welch CC. Review: spontaneous rupture of splenic artery aneurysm in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;109(2):124–7.

22. Trimble WK, Hill JH. Congestive splenomegaly (Banti’s disease) due to portal stenosis without hepatic cirrhosis; aneurysms of the splenic artery. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1942; 34:423. 23. Martinez E, Menedez AR, Ablanedo P. Splenic artery aneurysms. Int Surg 1986;71(2):95–9. 24. Evans HM, Sharif K, Brown RM, Platt C, Crisp WJ, Kelly DA, et al. Fatal and life threatening rupture of splenic artery aneurysms in children with portal hypertension. Pediatr Transplant 2004;8:192–5. 25. de Vries JE, Schattenkerk ME, Malt RA. Complications of splenic artery aneurysm other than intraperitoneal rupture. Surgery 1982;91:200–4. 26. Gaglio PJ, Regenstein F, Slakey D, Cheng S, Takiff H, Rinker R, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and splenic artery aneurysm rupture: an association? Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95: 1531–4. 27. D’Ambrosio R, Ricciardelli L, Lanni GL, Iarrobino GF, Moggio G, Casale LS, et al. Intraperitoneal haemorrhage from rupture of an aneurysm of splenic artery: case report and literature review. Ann Ital Chir 2003;74(1):97–101. 28. Barrett JM, Van Hooydonk JE, Boehm FH. Pregnancy related rupture of arterial aneurysms. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1982;37(9): 557–66. 29. Wadsworth R, Devine A, Raychaudhuri K. Splenic aneurysm rupture as a cause of maternal collapse. Int J Obstet Anesth 1996;5(2):99–102. 30. Messina LM, Shanely CJ. Visceral artery aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:425–42. 31. Salo JA, Salmenkivi K, Tenhunen A, Kivilaakso EO. Rupture of splanchnic artery aneurysms. World J Surg 1986; 10:123–7. 32. Lang W, Strobel D, Beinder E, Raab M. Surgery of a splenic aneurysm during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2002;102: 215–6. 33. Busuttil RW, Brin BJ. The diagnosis and management of visceral artery aneurysms. Surgery 1980;88:619–24. 34. O’Grady JP, Day EJ, Toole AL, Paust JC. Splenic artery aneurysm rupture in pregnancy: a review and case report. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:627–30. 35. Brockman RL. Aneurysm of splenic artery. Br J Surg 1929–1930; 17:692–3. 36. Regent D, Hodez C, Bigard MA, Regent MC, Gaucher P, Roussel J, et al. Splenic arterial aneurysm rupturing into the splenic vein. A rare cause of acute portal hypertension in the post-partum period. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 1977;58(2): 151–4. 37. Khan HR, Low S, Selinger M, Nelson N. Splenic artery aneurysm rupture in pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2004;14:298–9. 38. Loke SS, Bullard MJ, Liaw SJ, Liao HC. Splenic artery aneurysm rupture in pregnancy – a review and case report. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 1995;18(2):166–9. 39. Tanchev S, Popova M, Slavov I. The splenic emergency syndrome during pregnancy (a report of two cases). Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 1992;31(1):32–4. 40. Lowry SM, O’Dea TP, Gallagher DI, Mozenter R. Splenic artery aneurysm rupture: the seventh instance of maternal and fetal survival. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:291–2. 41. Fender GRK, Haslett E, Leary T, Bland E, Hackett G. Management of splenic artery aneurysm rupture during trial of with epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1038–9. 42. Richardson AJ, Bahlool S, Knight J. Ruptured splenic artery aneurysm in pregnancy presenting in a manner similar to pulmonary embolus. Anaesthesia 2006;61(2):187–9. 43. Al Asfar F, Saber M, Dhar PM, Al Awadhi N. Rupture of splenic artery aneurysm during labour: a case of maternal and fetal survival. Med Princ Pract 2005;14(1):53–4.

international journal of surgery 6 (2008) 261–265

44. Gallot D, Bournazeau JA, Amblard J, Pouly JL, Lemery D. Rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm during pregnancy. Report of a case. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1999;28: 168–70. 45. Parangi S, Levine D, Henry A, Isakovich N, Pories S. Surgical gastrointestinal disorders during pregnancy. Am J Surg 2007; 193:223–32. 46. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. ACOG Committee opinion no. 158. Washington, D.C.: ACOG; 1995. 47. Derchi LE, Biggi E, Cicio GR, Bertoglio C, Neumaier CE. Aneurysms of the splenic artery: noninvasive diagnosis by pulsed Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:41–4. 48. Lin CT, Chiang CW, Hsieh HC. Extrasplenic pseudoaneurysm: the role of color flow Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis. Jpn Heart J 1999;40:365–8.

265

49. Pilleul F, Beuf O. Diagnosis of splanchnic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, with special reference to contrastenhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography: a review. Acta Radiol 2004;45:702–8. 50. Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: clinical distinctions and CT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:992–9. 51. Mole RH. Irradiation of the embryo and fetus. Br J Radiol 1987; 60:17–31. 52. Nelson JA, Livingston JC, Moon RG. Mutagenic evaluation of radiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol 1982;17:183–5. 53. Nincheri Kunz M, Pantalone D, Borri A, Paolucci R, Pernice LM, Taruffi F, et al. Management of true splenic artery aneurysms. Two case reports and review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2003;58(2):247–56. 54. Puttini M, Aseni P, Brambilla G, Belli L. Splenic artery aneurysms in portal hypertension. J Cardiovasc Surg 1982;23:490–3.