Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial

Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial

IN CONSULTATION treatment, we compared this risk in patients with a history of torsades de pointes who were and were not subsequently treated with a...

136KB Sizes 1 Downloads 55 Views

IN

CONSULTATION

treatment, we compared this risk in patients with a history of torsades de pointes who were and were not subsequently treated with amiodarone. Of 205 patients with advanced heart failure, 8 (4%) treated with amiodarone had prior druginduced torsades de pointes. Despite similar severity of heart failure, the l-year actuarial sudden death risk was markedly increased in amiodarone patients with than without prior torsades de pointes (55% vs 15%, p = 0.0001). Similarly, the incidence of l-year sudden death was markedly increased in patients with prior torsades de pointes taking amiodarone compared with such patients who were not subsequently treated with amiodarone (55% vs 0%, p = 0.09). In patients with advanced heart failure, prior drug-induced torsades de pointes identifies heart failure patients at high risk for sudden death during therapy with amiodarone.

dieted modes of initiation of ventricular tachycardia and between spontaneous and induced rhythms could result in inappropriate guidance and subsequent failure of antiarrhythmic treatment.

Significance and Incidence of Concordance of Drug Efficacy Predictions by Holter Monitoring and Electrophysiological Study in the ESVEM Trial M.J. Reiter, D.E. Mann, J.E. Reiffel, E. Hahn, V. Hartz. Division of Cardiology, Colorado University Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO. Circulation 1995;91: I988 -95.

Background: Selection of antiarrhythmic therapy may be based on either suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias assessed by Holter monitoring or by suppression of inducible ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological study. This study examines the frequency and significance of concordance of these two approaches in the Electrophysiologlc Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial. Methods and Results: Twenty-fourhour Halter monitoring was performed in patients randomized to the electrophysiology limb of the ESVEM study at the time of the first drug trial and at the time of an effective drug trial. Holter monitors were available in 65% (146/226) of patients at the time of the first drug trial and in 93% (100/108) of palients at the time of an electrophysiology study predicting drug efficacy. There were no clinical differences between patients who had and those who did not have a Holter monitor. At the time of the first drug trial, concordance of Holter and electrophysiological predictions of drug eficacy was observed in 46% of patients (both techniques predicted efficacy m 23%; neither predicted efficacy in 23%). Discordant results were observed in 54% (Holter suppression without electrophyslological suppression in 44%; electrophysiological suppression without Holter suppression in 10%). At the time of an electrophysiology study predicting drug efficacy, 68 of the 100 patients without inducible ventricular tachyarrhylhmias also had suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias on the Holter recorded at the time of the electrophysiological study. Neither arrhythmia recurrence nor mortality was significantly dilTerent in patients with suppression of both inducible and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with only suppression of inducible arrhythmias. Comparison of patients with suppression of both inducible and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias with the 188 patients in the Holter limb, in whom efficacy was predicted by Holter monitoring only revealed no difference in outcome. Conclusions: In this population, (1) there is frequent discordance in prediction of drug efficacy and inefficacy between electrophysiological study and Holter monitoring; (2) a requirement to fulfill both Halter and electrophysiological efficacy criteria reduces the number of patients with an efficacy prediction; and (3) suppression of both spontaneous ventricu-

Spontaneous Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial K.P. Anderson, R Walker, T. Dustman, M. Fuller, M. Mori. Cardiac Electrophysiology Program, Presbyterian University Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26: 489 -96.

Objectives: We compared the QRS waveforms of the initial and subsequent complexes of spontaneous sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and the rhythm induced at electrophysiologic study to test the theory that premature ventricular complexes “trigger” spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and that a stable substrate exists such that the spontaneous arrhythmia can be reproduced at electrophysiologic study. Background: Failure rates have been high m several recent studies in which prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was guided by suppression of premature ventricular complexes or induced ventricular tachycardias. Methods: Digital waveform analysis was used to distinguish events of ventricular tachycardia initiated by configurationally distinct, possibly triggering, complexes (type 1) from events in which the initial QRS waveforms were identical to subsequent complexes, suggesting no requirement for premature ventricular beats (type 2). Results: Of 1.102 episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia, 73 (6.6%) were type 1; 1,012 were type 2 (91.8%); and 17 (1.5%) were uncertain. Of 59 patients only 14 (24%) had only type 1 episodes (group l), whereas 37 patients (63%) had predominantly type 2 events (group 2) (p < 0.0001). Sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in all group 1 patients, and in most (57%) the induced rhythm was similar to the spontaneous rhythm. Ventricular tachycardia could not be induced in 7 patients from group 2 (19%), and in 18 patients (49%) the induced and spontaneous rhythms were dissimilar. Recurrence of arrhythmia rates differed according to the guidance method in group 2. Conclusions: Discrepancies between observed and pre4CC

CURRENT

JCI RNAL

REVIEW

58

Januar~/Frbruaq~

19%