F. Ffnop er al.
2346 iodide
salt
iodine,
the
thioether
proved
the
analogous
ditions, and g.
of
which
2 and 4 with
iodide
formed.
substance
However,
!, gave
on slight
containing
under
no ionic
identical
a 3~7 mixture
of
concompounds
heating,
could be transformed 2 and 6 were obtained in good yields
derivatives
methyl
2.
derivative
mixture,
2-methylthio
pounds
thiolcarbamate
trans-thioxo
Compound $ in this
The desired
1, but a water-insoluble
to be the
iodide
in the presence
of
-CiS
I
-cis:
2
-6 -cis:
trans: -_
8
trans: -_
4
trans:
a base
binding
to a. from com-
the hydrogen
X=Br:
2
6
2
x = Cl:
&E,
Scheme 1 In the
reaction
113 formation of the corresponding Z-__ with methyl iodide, methylthio derivative was supposed 14 and the correct structure 12g ___ of the reaction 17 product was later determined . An analogous finding was made for the oxazine 15 18,19 17 homologues . On the basis of earlier literature data , Clapp --et al. assumed that the 4,4-dimethyl substitution exerts a stabilizing effect in the reaction of of
4,4-dimethyloxazolidinethione
S 6;;
s I-CT$-(C&+,-NW-SCT+S
-
-r
methyl
ring-opened
n = 1
119 -___ gig
n = 2
amine hydrobromide19 As the
above
has not
been
nations
are
reaction
seemed
vative
2.
After
with
the
reagents
detailed
proving
that
its
a short
standing
iodide
to give
on the action
bromoethyl-
different. methyl
of
studies, and contradictory results 17-19 , we performed investigations step
in the
reaction takes
iodide
by adding
quantitative
was achieved
reaction
of
deri-
thione
The ring-opening
the hydrogen
of
was obtained
S-substituted with
the
Formation
from 4,4-dimethyl-2-oxazolidineare
IR
iodide
and explaon the
generalizability.
the first iodide.
12.
vative
in the two reactions
ring-opening
of
structure
the corresponding
on the subject
hydrogen
in nearly
hydrogen
129
aim of
likely of
mechanism
was formed
n = 2
surprising
on the.action
this
&ZZe
subject
the
formation
step, of
the
n = 1
, 1.~.
to be found
with
It the
However, the intense -1 at 1646 cm rather indicates
band’g
Go
with
iodide.
formed hydrogen
(Scheme iodide
at room temperature, yield.
The trans
the ring-opened
urea
is S-methylation, place 1). to
the isomer
with
in the following Unambiguous
the
proof
2-methylthio
deri-
ring-opened
product
6,
reacted
derivative
however, fl only
2
on slight
heating. The cis chloride
compound
derivatives
2 and Je could
oxazolidinethione the of
4,4-dimethyl the bromide In contrast
cis-
2 underwent
at room temperature, relative
no reaction
be isolated. to that
substitution
with
but on refluxing of
hydrogen
bromide
in ethanolic the stability
Thus,
P-bromoethylamine
as assumed earlier
“,
but
or hydrogen
solution of
the halogen
4,4-dimethyl-2-
hydrobromide
is
to the
nucleophilicity
lower
due not
anion. to
the
reactions
of
2 and f,
ethanol
at room temperature
opening,
but the expected
to yield 2-thioether
not
their
structural reacted
and trans-l,S-perhydrobenzoxazine-2-thiones, the
hydrogen
isomers12
with
methyl
iodomethylthiolCaTt)aA5’tas iodide
salts
(12,’
16).
and
iodide
13, in
by ringThe
to
F. 1FoL(kCI al. Tebla
1.
Selected
Com-
IR and
‘H NHR date
IR bands
pound
on compounds
j-&Q,
12 and 16’
,.hemical
shifts
(bppm)
Coupling
constants Jag,
(Hz)
?NH
3c=o
SC=N
42-H
bz- H
10-H
Jbtz, b&
-
-
1615
4.21
4.06
3.59
-10.4
3.4
4.5
-
-
1650
4.19
3.90
2.91
-10.2
4.4
10.8
5
5
‘bg,
3300
1630
3.22
2.98
4.39
-9.9
6.0
8.5
3280
1630
-
3.41
3.05
3.60
-9.6
2.9
9.6
3200
1625
-
3.42
3.19
4.40
-10.2
6.5
8.1
3150
1630
-
3.54
3.32
4.40
-11.0
6.6
7.1
-
-
1620
3.51
3.31
4.44
-15.7
5.3
2.6
-
-
1615
3.49
3.04
3.84
-15.6
5.0
11.1
and trans
(A@)
a For ease of comparability of the spectroscopic data on the compounds investigated, the following numbering has been used:
distortion
in the heterorings
compounds
were identified
compound 15, O-inside --
analogously
firm
to
predominates
Table
2.
of
compounds. with
the P-thioxo (Fig.
The &
earlier
(12)
NMR parameters9.
derivatives
In the -cis earlier ‘1, the
investigated
1).
13C NMRchemical
shifts
of
compounds
13C NMRchemical
Compound
these
by comparison
shifts
Z-JP,
12 and iaa
(6ppm) c-9
c-10
21.3
32.3
52.3
13.5
25.3
34.1
58.5
13.5
C-2
C-b
C-5
C-6
C-l
c-e
z
156.5
10.5
32.3
2b.lb
2b.2b
6_
157.2
71.6
38.0
27.3
25.3
SCH,
I
167.6
0.7
43.1
21.1
24.1
21.0
30.5
50.6
12.2
B
167.3
11.5
45.2
32.3
25.3b
25.0b
33.5
54.9
12.2
P
167.1
35.8
42.7
26.1
24.0
20.9
30.4
49.6
12.2
lP
167.5
46.15
42.7
25.1
24.0
20.9
30.3
40.9
12.1
12
157.2
49.6
32.5
25.2
23.9
19.9
29.8
74.7
13.2
16
157.7
50.4
37.6
28.2
23.9
24.9
31.1
79.7
13.2
is
possible.
a See Table
1.
b Reversed
assignment
also
EXPERIMENTAL The ‘H and “C on a Sruker meter, spectra data
NHR spectra
YM-250 spectrometer
respectively, were
recorded
and the
synthesis
were
recorded
and at 20.14
in COC13 solution,
with
in
5 and 10 mm tubes UP-80
TMS as internal
standard.
on a SPECORO 75 IR spectrometer methods
are
given
in
at
MHz on a Bruker
Table
3.
in KBr pellets.
250.13
MHz
SY spectroThe
IR
The physical
s~8-.saturatalhetcrocycka-99 Reaction
of
2 - or 4 _ with
Thioxo methyl
compound
iodide
reaction
of
Thioxo ml) with product of
wes
methyl was
the
iodide extracts,
H.p.
30% thioether
in
3.
(OC)
5
oil
6
6
oil
B
presence
which,
of
of
the
conditions,
on refluxing
water ml).
for
on compounds
C
H
N
8)
5X methanolic
KOH (20
(20 ml) vas added
After
drying as
>-1Q, - -_
Found (X)
(X1
in
2 or $ was obtained
data
Yield
KOH (Method
gl was stirred (3x30
thioether
Analytical
ml> and
(30
Under similar
salt,
evaporation,
extraction
the
Method
pound
the
0.85
After
(1 ill.
chloroform
5 hr and evaporation
was obtained.
(1)
iodide
by ether
Table
Corn-
methyl
for
in
compound e.
2 or 4 (5 mmole,
isolated
combined
about into
converted
compound
standing
product
compound fl with
A)
g> was dissolved
After
edded.
2_ or 4_ with
(Method
0.85
a crystalline
was completely
Reaction
iodide
2 (5 mmole,
(1 ml)
mixture,
compound 4 gave 3 hr,
methyl
2349
and the
and evaporation a pale-yellow
oil.
12 and IQ
Calculated
Formula
(Xl
c
H
‘N
89 82
50.59 58.25
0.46 8.25
7.99 7.97
C9N15NOS
50.34
8.16
7.56
97 78 L$
34.72 34.47
5.32 5.32
4.97 4.22
C9H161NOS
34.51
5.15
4.47
I
116-117a
;
!!
127-12Sb
;
P
SO-8Sb
C
61
40.94
6.74
5.05
CqH166rNOS
40.60
6.06
5.26
19
50-55c
C
63
40.06
7.81
6.61
C9H16C1NOS
40.74
7.27
6.32
lZd
112-114’
A A
95 93
34.27 34.11
5.40 5.12
4.66 4.92
C9H161NOS
34.51
5.15
4.47
Jhd
170-172a
a From EtOH. b From EtOAc. Reaction
of
2 (0.5 stand
5 - or 6 - with
cc.
salt
6 underwent
HEr or cc.
Attempted
12 (0.5
il could
lit.9
of
thioether for
Al and &B1’. m.p.
was refluxed by
185.5-186 of
residue
extracts,
was obtained,
epimerizetion
be detected
the
was refluxed
oil
oxazinones ‘C,
Attempted
gl
of
d Hydrogen
(Method (15 ml)
salts
for
6 hr.
3 hr.
was extracted
with
crystalline
products
12 and 16 (Method (25 ml>.
‘H NMR spectrum
Under similar ‘C).
of
conditions,
was allowed The trans
After
thioether
evaporation
chloroform. (I-lQ> _ __
and
After
were obtained.
01
On evaporation,
which
to
The ring-opening
HI (1 ml).
HI for
S hr in ethanol the
salt.
and the solution
40X aqueous with
iodide
C)
out by refluxing
on refluxing
10% NaOH, the
ring-opening
crystallizing
with
HCl was carried
and evaporation
186-187
halides
in ethanol
ring-opening
with
neutralization
of
hydrogen
g) was dissolved
with
ture
From I-hexane.
1 hr at room temperature
for
drying
’
suggested
16 __ gave
a slowlya 3:l
18 __ (67X,
mixm.p.
11
for R hr in ethanol 1 H NMR spectroscopy;
(20 ml)
with
4gX aqueous
70% unchanged
HI (1 ml).
&I was recovered.
No ia
F. Ftkdr er al.
2350 References la
Part for
96:
Gy.
Argay,
publication;
A. Kalman,
lb
Part
submitted ’ 1.
Kanetani,
for
Heterocycles,
12,
735
J.
Simon,
Szabb,
G. BernBth, L.
Fodor,
2.
&.
accepted
Struct.,
E. Szfics,
G. BernBth,
P.
Sohar,
publication.
K. Kigasawa,
’ A. V. Bogatskii,
L.
98:
M. Hiigari,
K. Yakisaka,
H. Sugi,
K.
lanigera,
(1979).
N. G. Lukianenko,
1.
I.
Kirichenko,
-.
E.
Soed _*,
1%@,
723. 4
K. T. 29,
Potts,
1677
’ P.
Richter,
6 I.
Lantos,
0.
E.
K. G. Bordeaux,
Y. R. Knehuling,
R. L.
Salsbuny,
2.
m.
m.,
(1965). D. Horgenstern, P.
E.
Griswold,
Pharmazie,
Bender, 0.
T.
22,
’ F.
Fulop,
G. BernBth,
P.
* F.
Fiilop,
G. Bernath,
Gy.
2.
Med. u.,
SohBr,
I.
(1984).
B. H. Sutton,
K. A. Razgaitis, Walz,
301 21,
Pelcter,
. s.
2.
A. KBlmtin, P. SohBr,
Argay,
M.
J.
Oi Hartino,
72 (1984). Perkin
I,
Tetrahedron,
C!Nj, ip,
2043.
2053
(19B4). 9 G. BernBth, lo
Gy.
GtindBs, K. Kovks,
A. E.
G. StBjer,
Szabb,
F.
P. Sohar,
Fulop,
Tetrahedron,
G. Bernath,
P.
20,
Sohar,
981
(1973).
Heterocvcles,
13,
1191
(1982).
l1 F. Fiilijp, l2
G. Bernath, A. E.
G. Sttijer, Tetrahedron,
13
14
P. SohBr,
22,
1829
G. Bernath,
A. F. McKay,
M.
1’
T. Hukaiyama,
l6
F.
Csirinyi,
Gy.
Sohar, F.
Tetrahedron,
a.
m.
Kuwajima, J.
Reson.,
Can.
2.
2o 0.
M. Grant, F.
22 F. W. Wehrli, London,
1978,
8. V. Cheney,
Fiiliip, pp.
for
A. KBlmBn,
22-48.
159 49,
publication. Gy.
Argay,
P. SohBr,
2.
A. Szabb,
G. BernBth,
3. fi.
&.
a.
Interpretation
a.
(1963).
Chem.,
21,
-Can. a.
2.
@.,
Q,
1982, 1149. _-__ 2, 107 (196B).
m., 24,
m.,
Reson.,
of
32 (1966).
Synthesis,
Heterocyclic
%.,
w.
(1973). 205
K. Hikui,
G. Bernath,
T. Wirthlin,
2,
Chem.,
L. Long, J., ” R. C. Clapp, F. H. Bissett, 18 H. Skulski, 0. L. Garmaise, A. F. McKay, 19 R. C. Clapp, L. Long, T. Hasselstrom, J. 21 P. SohBr,
accepted
G. BernBth,
FiilBp,
(19B3).
E. Kreling,
I.
FulSp,
P.
Szabb,
za, 5315 22,
Carbon-13
815
1308
(1956).
(1963).
(1967). 527
(1984).
NMR
spectra,
Heyden
Ltd,