TotrahdronLettom No.14,pp. 1551~155g,,1966,
Porgamn PromoLtd.
Printed in Groat Briwn.
STEREOCHEMISTRY
Y.
Inubuahi,
Faculty
AND
BIOGENESIS
Ii. Inhii,
OF SERRAX'ININK
B. Yamui
of Pharmaceutical
and
Sciencba,
Toyonaka,
Osaka-fu,
aerratinine
warn isolated
var.
Thunbargii
MAKINO.
wish
to prement
the
biogeneaia
alkaloid.
Braun
degradation
neutral
lubwtance
N2W3;
pmax
yield.
Treatment
m.p.
239-2401
no carbonyl in this
k&al
2188
from
and
of
band.
alao
(II),
1739
(II) with
C17R2403N2,
and
alkali
timax 3509
ra#
m.p.
the absolute
to the hypothetical
cm -'
and
of the
demonatratod
by
(I,)*l
200-202°*2, (;C=O)
furnished (OH)
TRUNB,
tha author8
including
refer
1729
Participation
formation
#erratum
corrrminication (IX)
(I) for
diacotylserratininb*
, cyanobroride (N-CN),
structure
Lycopodium
atereorrtructure
of thin
On von
tha
In this
of serratinine
configuration
University,
1966)
paper 1) we proposed
which
Osaka Japan
(Rooolvod 29 JanIn the predodfng
T. Rarhyama
in good
cm -'
(III), (N-CN),
Cl3 hydroxyl
group
the formation
of an
01
Physical con&ants and preparation of the compound marked with an anteri8k in thi8 paper appeared in the preceding comication.
l2
All melting point8 were obaexvod hotntage and are uncorracged.
l3
All compounds analy8ea.
given
on a Kofler
by formulaegave
1551
correct
a
C21H2905
a k&al
2188
gave
type
microscope
elementary
1552
Np.14
anhydroketal the ketal rum
l4
(III) (IV),
Of
ton)
and
(IV),
8.29
with the
in (III)
adjacent
to
the
two
from
with
CrO3-pyridine
e., vinyl
muet
following gave
monoacetylserratinine degradation
C19H2504N2Br,
vmax
on treatment Although
might
tion
steric
of the
conclusion sented
th&t
by the
Because junction being
must
axially
in the
formula
Oxidation
l4
hand,
cause
Another
5.8-6.2
Jones'
has
1745,
been
structure
of
284-285', (3H, m.;CI&O-
and
of von
m.p.
169-172':
1698
cm-1
(X-0)
dehydroketal that
(V).
von
Braun
D, a consideraL
formation
of the ketal
(III)
(VI),
of ring
for ketal
support
reagent
presented
the cleavage
free
treatments
1733,
afforded
pro-
(C8)
oxidation
successive
(Ib) with
limitation
situated
NMR
the
atom
carbon
group.
(>C=O),
alkali
be cis,
on the
of
epect-
olefinic
that
(VI, m.p.
with
of this
showed
dehydroketal
(N-CN),
formula
methyl)
Thus,
2193
the
(H-I, m.,
dehydrocyanobromide
no evidence
degradation
In the NMR
finding.
II* gave
on treatment
at 4.37
metKy1
On the other
+-o-W,-).
C171Q202N2,
be located
“max 1692 cm-l
C17H2203N2'
which
signale
secondary
came
Braun
175-1780,
PoCl 3 in pyridine.
't (3~,
hYdrOxy1
the
m.p.
led
should
to the
be repre-
(III). readyketal
formation,
the participating with
respect
the A/B
hydroxyl
to the ring
ring
group
at C
A as shown
(VII). of monoacetylsarratinine
II*
(Ib)
with
Jones'
All NMR spectra were taken on a Varian A-60 machine with SiMe4 as an internal standard by Dr. T. in CDCl Shingu,3Kyoto University, to whom we express our thanks.
13
No.14
(0 (14 (Ib) (IO) (Id) (10)
R1 = R2 = OH, R3 = H RI= OAo, R2=OH, B3=R RI= OH, R2=OAo, R3=H R1=H , R2-OH, R3=OH RI-H, R2-OR, RJ-OAo R1=R2=OAo , RJ=H
(Ie)
I BrCN
I
f Br
(11)
(III)
(IV) CH3 0 0
(III)
Cf13 - Pyridi;l
1p II ii
0
*
03
T
OH-
(II)
I
oxidation
dehydromonoaoetyl aerratlnlne 11 BrCN >
No.14
1554
reagent
afforded
the
sole
acetylserratinine
II*
yield,
NaBH4
gave
which
upon
a mixture
CIiCl3, the
be
with
elufion
with
serratinine 3340 and
(OH)
be
Jones'
epimeric reagent
difference alcohols
two
‘,C=b);
spots
gave
cm-1
in all
to give
in the
the
in 8-episerratinine
chromatography.
since
would
on
found
to
Subsequent
compound,
&pi-
they
the
of serratinine
These were
two
products
oxidized
with
a triketone*.
behavior
of two
conformation
be axial,
being
was
ratio
product,
that
mixture
, C16H2503N, VIMx 3520,
l:2.5.
chromatographic
in serratinine
layer epimeric
The
s&me
to assume
by hydrolysis
crystalline
about
in good
respects.
234-237O
(X=0).
was
-0Ac)
followed on thin
dehydromono-
eluted'component
another m.p.
C13,
of this
first
at Ca only,
, permits
group
group ring
1737
8-episerratinine
must
xyl
AcOEt
product.5,
reduction,
serratinine
(VIII=Ic), and
Ca,
purification
alumina'with identical
:
(Ib
showing
On.chromatographic
oxidation
equatorial
that
The
epimeric of Ca hydro-
of Ca hydroxyl
with
respect
to
A. This
Acetylation (Id,?,
deduction of
was
(VIII=Ic)
m'.p. 220.5-221",
also gave
confirmed
by the
monoacetyl
C1aH2704N*
showed
"max virtually
spectral
means.
8-episerratinine 3270
one
(OH),
spot
1747
and
*5
The reaction product layer chromatography.
on thin
l6
That an introduced acetyl group in monoacstyl &episerratinine must be at C was based'on the fact that dem.p. 16q-170~Cl~H2504 hydrcmonoacetyl B-episer B atinine, R =OAc in Id) derived from monoacatyl &piNserra tcl?9:c-o; inine (Ia) by oxidation with Jones' reagent 9 WC not identical with both dehydromonoacetylserratinine I* in Ia) and dehydromonoacetylserratir R2=OAc in Ib).
No.14
(VIII)
(VII) 1732
cm -1
N 11
c.p.s.,>Cg-OAc),
(=c-01,
The
OAc).
acetoxyl 4.94
eignal
group
the
On the that
the
1250
cm-lie
ary methyl scopic methyl
peak6
for
have
been
conformations
u-e
group
findinge.
also
obtained
well
known
at 1200-
but 2)
coneieta .
ehored
IR spectra that
conformation came
In comparison
in diaaetyl
concerned.
by Burnell The
a8
et al. 3) of
the
reasonable.
equatorial
in eerratinine
been
eubetituente
eerratinine quite
proton
epimern
at
(Id)
vibration
alkaloide.
from
of
equatorial the axial
acetates
aeeignment
etreching
to an
5 c;p.e.)
8-epieerratinine
it h&s
‘0,
appeared
(half-width,
of acetatee,
the
(3R,
gominal
(Ia)
to the
J2
c.P.s.,
7.96
I*
conformation
for
5.5
to a proton
in monoacetyl
C-O
p., J1-
m.,>Cg-OH),
multiplet
of lycopodium
group
clean
attributable
to the
results
epimeric
The
due
three
in acetates
aeeigned
(1H,
aeeignbd
simple
Comparable
6.48
IR spectra
band
of two or
(lH,
sharp
to that
suggeeting
5.17
in monoacatyleerratinine
z ae a rather
conetraekted
two
NM?
benzylidene
to the
from
the NMR
of the
chemical
aerratinine'
eecond-
epectro-
lhiSQt with
of
tHat
1556
No.14
of this
group
shift
(ca.
ribed
to the
ved.
that
favorably benzene
also
the
which
range
has
field
would
ring,
beneilidene
methyl
be asc-
was
obser-
aerratinine
the hydrogens
.ehielding
been
coupling
170'are
effect
of the
Jl=
5.5
c.p.8.
in
the
formula
has
formation
resulted The
that from
11 c.p.s. the
established,
of Cl5 -CH3
group
sidered
(VIII)
should to the
the
equatorial
cis relationship to ring
B was
, since
Conformation
because
deduced
group
of C4-N
group
and
by pKa'
to J
the
f+,-HC
in
that
the
This
deduction
assignment
it would
junction that
Of Cg-Hb
equatorial.
of that
shown
cia
in turn,
mulrt be assigned
it can be
of
coupling
be allocated
the A/B
indicated,
methyl
epimerization
The
45°should
4)
respectively
11 c.p.s..
conformational
in serratinine,
angles,
in the NMFt spectrum
axial
be
calculated
dihedral
11 c.p.s.,
B I ca.
for
SinCe
been
JS=
This
JS=
be applicable
methyl
and
eatabliahed. constant
and
in serratinine
The
to the
constants
J l= 5.5 c.p.s.
group
finding.
4 c.p.s.
coupling
e = 1700.
(Vlll)
of methyl
JS corresponding
J 1 and
observed
to JHamHb
respect
long
a high
of a benzene
equatorial
for
former,
of diacetyl
by another
Br
conat&n$
would
model
supported
were
for
effect
conformation
for
the
(Id)
only
in the
ansigned
@=45'and
l7
anisotropic
of 6erratinine,
ring.
valuea
has
p.p.m.1
situated
The
and
0.3-0.4
A Dreiding
showed
was
in derivative6
of the
be hardly
in (VIII)
con-
con-
has
in serratinine.
ClB-Cl3
bond
measurements
with
'7 on two
~~!1;11uea were measured in l/10 N-H SO (1 ml)- EtOH m - HSO (4 ml) solvent system by 2 ti t ration with l/10 N- NaoH solution.
No.14
ho
eight-carbon
polyacetate straiqht mains 1
1V’ .I
.
(XII)
NO.14
155g
pairs
of the
following
diacetylmerratinine (pKa*
10.9)
and
These
1.1. mation
compounds:
of pXa' hydrogen
and protonated
merratinine
is represented
values
by
the
and
deoromerratinine
suggested
bonding
that
(~Xa~7.0)
A plCa'
(pita' 9.81,
nitrogen
it can be concluded
Thus,
1.7;
diacetyldeoxoserratinine differences
group
A pXa'
(pXa'5.31,
of intramolecular
hydroxyl
aerratinine
between
the the
C
forw 13
atom.
the
of
stereostructure
formula
(IX)
or its mirror
image. Application tinine
II*,
[a]:'
serratinine (>C=O)
: 25.60
-1
cm
1600
(bensoate)
+ 62.30
conclumion
that
center
8-O-bensoyl-monoacetyl-
, C25D3105N,
(01) -82.4O
the absolute
~~~~1742,
[b]E3 + 14.630
(aromatic),
- [W],
(EtOH);
- 144.7O,
configuration
1700
led
CM],
to the
at C8 asymmetric
is S-form.
Consequently, im represented This simtent
with
by
the
(XI)
It has inherent
strong
(trough), m.p. mhould
been
(XII;
[+I308
configuration
Cotton +3735'
effect (peak);
81-85O , C16H250N give
a positive
whome Cotton
by Conroy 6) that
alkaloids,
no OH at C8), polyacetate
Details of preparation in the full paper.
of serratinine
(IX).
pomitive
suggested
eight-carbon
stereostructure
of the absolute
in lycopodium
lycodoline of two
the formula
assignment
the ketone*8(X), shown
the abmolute
by
Wl 273 -1023O
l8
(EtOIi) and
, m.p. 134-135O
II
and
rule 5) to monoacetylserra-
of the benaoate
such
might
owe
ketone
con-
(RD in HeOH, a- +47.58)
Octant
of
projection
curves.
the
skeleton
as lycopodine
straight
of this
was
to the
and
condensation
chains.
will
be reported
1559
No.14
If lycodoline
or a close
tinine
in the
plant,
by the
supposed
as shown This
assumption from
posed
absolute
that
appears
of an alkaloid type
hydroxyl
alkaloids
ara
lycofarcine') Cl2.
experimental
the
together
which
lycodoline
sequence
by
serratinine,
be
the
the
oxygen
collsllonlyfound possessing
expected
supposed
at C5,
Of course,
while
is plausible
the
enough
was
iso-
the
pro-
with
to arise
does
not
from
the
saem to be
lycopodium Cl2,
functions
scheme
, it
and
uncertain.
transformation.
C8 and
oxygen
alkaloid
coincides
functiomin
three
type
lycodoline
of serratinine might
to aride
is somewhat
since
with
of serra-
be visualised
at C8 in serratinine
since
transformation
could
reasonable
alkaloids
group
is the precursor
from
confi@tration
unaccountable,
and
although
the plant
lycodoline The
serratinine
transformation
in Chart,
lated
derivative
on this will
especially, at C5,
C8
biogenetical
require
the
support. REFERENCES
1.
The
preceding
communication,
Tetrahedron
Letters
in press.
Humphries, F. Herling and K. Dobriner, 2. 2. N. J. Jones,P. m. &. z, 3215 (?951); A. Fiirst, H. H. Kuhn, e. R. Scotoni jr. an-s. H. W;5L;952); H. Hirshmann, . 3.R. H. Burnell and D. R. Taylor, Chem. Tetrahedron x, 173 (1961); -XL, 4. H. Conroy, Advances in Organic Chemistry, Vol II, Interscience publisher, Inc., New York. (1960). 5. J. H. Brewster, 6. H. Conroy,
Tetrahedron
Tetrahedron
l&,. 106
Letters
7. W. A. Ayar, W. R. Bowman 9, 328 (1965). -
and
No.
(1961). 10,
P. Kebarle,
34 (1960). Can.
2. m
p.310,