Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol turnover by concanavalin a is not sufficient to activate mouse thymocytes

Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol turnover by concanavalin a is not sufficient to activate mouse thymocytes

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 657-664 December 15, 1986 STIMULATION OF PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL TURNO...

639KB Sizes 0 Downloads 46 Views

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 657-664

December 15, 1986

STIMULATION OF PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL TURNOVER BY CONCANAVALIN A IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO ACTIVATE MOUSE THYMOCYTES Alan J. Feister and Harvey J. Sage Department of Biochemistry, Duke U n i v e r s i t y , and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705 Received August 29, 1986

Mouse thymocytes treated with the l e c t i n Concanavalin A do not p r o l i f e r a t e nor do they develop responsiveness to i n t e r l e u k i n 2. Co-treatment with Concanavalin A and e i t h e r l e c t i n - a c t i v a t e d splenocyte conditioned medium or phorbol ester caused increased i n t e r l e u k i n 2 receptor expression and proliferation. Under these conditions, l e c t i n alone stimulated a 3.4 fold increase in phosphatidylinositol turnover which was unaffected by the presence of conditioned medium. Phosphorylation of a 55 kD protein was stimulated in response to conditioned medium or phorbol ester, but not l e c t i n . These results indicate that stimulation of phosphoinositide turnover is not s u f f i c i e n t to activate thymocytes, and suggest that costimulating factors activate a kinase which is d i s t i n c t from protein kinase C, or a l t e r n a t i v e l y , activate protein kinase C through a process which is not coupled to phosphoinositide turnover. © 1986 Academic Press, Znc,

Activation

of

phosphoinositide

turnover

transmembrane s i g n a l l i n g mechanism for stimulated

breakdown of

second messengers: Ca2+ from the

has

a v a r i e t y of

polyphosphoinositides

reticulum,

hormones ( I ) .

gives

inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate,

endoplasmic

b e e n proposed

rise

which

to

two

causes

and d i a c y l g l y c e r o l

as

a

Hormone potential

release

(DG), which

is

of an

a c t i v a t o r of protein kinase C (PKC). PKC has been proposed to be a mediator of activation reported

(2). to

In support of t h i s

activate

lectin

transient

phosphatidylinositol

association

of

T lymphocyte

hypothesis, mitogenic l e c t i n s (PI)

turnover

phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate breakdown (6), stimulate

induced

PKC

with

(3,

4,

have been 5)

and have been found

the

cell

to

membrane (7).

ABBREVIATIONS 04, conditioned medium; Con A, Concanavalin A; d i a c y l g l y c e r o l ; IL2, i n t e r l e u k i n 2; IL2-R, i n t e r l e u k i n 2 receptor; p h o s p h a t i d y l i n o s i t o l ; PKC, protein kinase C.

657

and

DG, PI,

0006-291 X/86 $1.50 Copyright ~5 1986 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any ,/orm reserved.

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Furthermore, phorbol m%ristic acetate (PMA), which activates PKC by acting as a

DG analogue, is

ionophores (9).

strongly

comitogenic with

lectins

(8)

In some instances PMA is also mitogenic

and with

by i t s e l f

Ca2+

(10,11),

and can stimulate both the production of interleukin 2 (IL2) (12, 13) and the expression of IL2 receptors (IL2-R) (14). T lymphocyte mitogenesis occurs in two stages. stimulated

to increase

IL2-R expression

(priming).

First,

resting cells are

Primed cells

mitogenically stimulated following interaction of IL2 with its receptor.

are then

high a f f i n i t y

We have observed that priming of mouse thymocytes by Concanavalin A

(Con A) requires simultaneous exposure to Con A and coactivators present in conditioned medium from lectin-activated splenocytes cells,

Con A provides

only one of

two required

(15). signals

Since, for

in these

priming,

we

examined the effects of Con A and coactivators on PI turnover in order to determine whether Con A,

coactivators,

or

both together

were l i k e l y

to

activate PKC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells: Thymocytes were isolated from 3 to 7 week old Laboratories).

CBA/J mice (Jackson

Conditioned Medium r(CM): Lectin-depleted CM from 48 hour cultures of rat splenocytes (5 x I0 ° cells/ml) cultured with 5 ~g/ml Con A was employed as a source of growth factors. Proliferation Assay: Thymocytes were cultured at 5 x 105 cells/ml_ in 0.2 ml cultures in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum, 5 x I0 "b M 2-mercaptoethanol, and antibiotics. Four hours prior to harvesting, 0.5 pCi [3H] th~midine (20 Ci/mnol) was added to each culture and uptake of radiolabel was determined. IL2-R Expression: 2.5 x 106 cells were stained by sequential treatment with monoclonal rat anti-mouse IL2-R (7D4) (16) and fluoresceinated anti-rat k chain (17). Stained cells were analyzed on an Ortho Cytofluorographic Model 50H using linear amplifiers. Cells exhibiting fluorescence intensities above the region defined by unstimulated thymocytes treated with FITC-anti-rat k alone were considered to be 7D4+. Purified T cell blasts were used as a positive control. PI Turnover: Cells (5 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 2 hrs at 37°C~in phosphate-free minimal essentia~ medium (MEM). 500 ~Ci carrier-free ~Pi was added to aliquots of 3 x 10 cells, incubation was continued for 60 min, stimulants or controls were added, and incubation was continued for another 60 rain. Cells were centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min at 5°C, washed with 2 ml ice-cold phosphate buffered saline and recentrifuged. Lipids were immediately extracted from the cell pellets (18), and phospholipids were

658

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

separated by two dimensional thin layer chromatography (~9). spots were identified by comigration with standards and ~LPi was determined by liquid s c i n t i l l a t i o n counting.

Phospholipid incorporation

Protein Phosphorylation: Cells were suspended at 106/ml i n 6phosphate-free MEM and preincubated at 37°C for 60 m i n . Aliquots (10 cells) were labelled with 200 ~Ci of 32pi for 90 min at 3 7 ° C . Stimulants or controls were added and incubation continued for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were pelleted, dissociated in 50 ~l SDS sample buffer, and heated at 100°C for 5 m i n . Samples were analyzed by 7.5% PAGE SDS electrophoresis ( 2 0 ) and autoradiography. RESULTS At 106 cells/ml or less, thymocytes do not proliferate in response to Con A, CM, or PMA alone, but do respond to a combination of Con A and either CM or PMA (Table I)o

At a concentration

of

Con A which yields optimal

mitogenesis the maximum stimulation by Con A/PMA was t y p i c a l l y 50-80% of that seen with

Con A/CM.

PMA was an effective comitogen at

concentrations

of

0.5-10 ng/ml but was not mitogenic by i t s e l f at concentrations up to 100 ng/ml. We have previously observed (15) that thymocytes treated for

up to 48

hours with Con A alone do not proliferate when subsequently recultured IL2. and

Instead, CM, and

in

effective priming required simultaneous treatment with Con A proceeded concurrently

with

an

upregulation

of

IL2-R.

We

therefore compared the effects of PMA and CM on IL2-R expression (Table I I ) .

TABLE I.

Effect of Con A, CM, and PMA on thymocyte proliferation Stimulusa

cpmb

None

1,148 +

671

Con Ac

2,443 ~

316

CM c

1,715 +

360

PMAc

1,419 ~

582

Con A and CM

74,994 ~ 4,560

Con A and PMA

43,039 ~ 4,035

aThymocytes were incubated for 72 hours in the presence of additions as shown. bResults of triplicate determinations + standard deviation. CCon A = 3 ~g/ml; PMA = 10 ng/ml; CM=-3%. 659

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

TABLE I I .

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Effect of Con A, CM, and PMA on IL2 receptor expression % 7D4+

Stimulants

Total b

High Density b

None

2.5

1.6

Con Ac

8.2

3.0

CMc

3.0

1.9

PMAc

3.5

0.6

Con A and CM

21.9

12.9

Con A and PMA

43.3

21.7

aThymocytes were cultured at 5 x 105 cells/ml for 48 hours in the presence of stimulants as shown prior to staining and cytofluorographic analysis. bTotal 7D4+ cells = channels 72-1000. High density region was a r b i t r a r i l y chosen to be from channels 151-1000. Purified T cells blasts used as a positive control were 99.5% 7D4+ with 90.6% high density. CCon A = 3 pg/ml; CM = 3%; PMA = I ng/ml.

Neither CM nor PMA s t i m u l a t e d IL2-R expression, and Con A alone caused only a small increase in the number o f c e l l s expressing IL2-R. PMA s t i m u l a t e d IL2-R expression in

the presence o f

less e f f e c t i v e than CM as a comitogen, i t

However, both CM and

Con A.

was more e f f e c t i v e

Although PMA was f o r coinduction

o f IL2-R.

TABLE I l l . Experiment

Effect of Con A and CM on 32p incorporation into PI Treatment

cpma

%

None Con Ab Con A and CMb

180 676 689

100 377 385

None Con A Con A and CM

156 401 354

100 258 227

None Con A Con A and CM

480 1,795 1,645

100 374 343

aResults are means of duplicate or t r i p l i c a t e determinations, corrected for r a d i o a c t i v i t y incorporated prior to addition of stimulants. Standard deviations were routinely less than 15%. bcon A = 3 ~g/ml; CM = 3%.

660

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A

B

C

D

E

F

205

116 97.4

66

pp55 45 36 29 24

FIGURE I . Autoradiograph of thymocyte proteins labelled in response to Con A, CM and PMA. (A) no stimulant; (B) 3 pg/ml Con A; (C) 3% CM; (D) I0 ng/ml PMA; E) 3 ~g/ml Con A and I0 ng/ml PMA; (F) 3 ~g/ml Con A and 3% CM.

Previous studies metabolism

have

been

mitogenic ( 3 - 6 ) . but

not

of the e f f e c t s performed

Since,

sufficient

of mitogenic under

lectins

conditions

on p h o s p h o i n o s i t i d e

where

lectin

stimulus

stimulated

I n c o r p o r a t i o n of essentially

32p

for

effective

incorporation

radioactivity

identical

is

under the c o n d i t i o n s employed, Con A was a necessary IL2-R

upregulation

in

thymocytes,

the e f f e c t of Con A and CM on PI t u r n o v e r was examined (Table I I I ) . itself

alone

into

PI

into in

PI

the

by

2.5

to

presence of

Con A by 3.7

fold.

Con A and CM was

to t h a t seen in the presence o f Con A a l o n e ,

indicating

t h a t CM has no enhancing e f f e c t on PI t u r n o v e r . We next examined whether Con A, CM and PMA s t i m u l a t e d similar labelling

proteins.

C e l l s treated

of a 55 kD p r o t e i n

with either

(pp55)

(Figure 661

CM or I).

p h o s p h o r y l a t i o n of

PMA showed an increase Labelling

of

pp55 did

in not

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

appear to be increased by treatment with Con A alone, nor did Con Anoticeably enhance the response to CM or PMA.

DISCUSSION We have examined the proposal that induction~ of involves PI stimulated

turnover-coupled PI

turnover

activation of

(presumably leading

PKC. to

IL2-R on T ljnnphocytes

We observed that activation

of

Con A

PKC) under

conditions where Con A was i n s u f f i c i e n t to prime thymocytes and caused only a small increase in IL2-R expression.

In contrast, simultaneous treatment with

Con A and the PKC activator PMA resulted in primed cells and large increases in IL2-R expression.

These results suggest that activation of PKC by Con A

induced PI turnover either does not occur, or is quantitatively insufficient to induce the large upregulation

of IL2 receptors required for priming.

It

has recently been reported that phytohemagglutinin stimulates transient (from 0 to 60 minutes) association of PKC with the membrane fraction in resting human peripheral

blood lymphocytes (7).

activation, membrane binding (21).

Mitogen-activated

of

PKC is

Although suggestive enhanced by elevated

lymphocytes have been reported

to

of

enzyme

Ca2+ levels have a

peak

i n t r a c e l l u l a r Ca2+ concentration of 250 nM (22), which is below the Ka for Ca2+ activation of PKC in the presence of DG in v i t r o (23), but is in the range

of

values at

which increased membrane binding

is

observed (21).

Although PKC may be transiently activated by lectins, our data indicate that this response i s , at least, insufficient to induce priming.

Activation of PKC

by PMA does co-induce IL2-R in the presence of l e c t i n , but, unlike l e c t i n , activation of PKC by PMA is probably prolonged (7).

We have also found that a

prolonged exposure of thymocytes to Con A (at least 10 hours) is required for co-activation with CM, suggesting that the i n t r a c e l l u l a r signals which are required are sustained over this period. We examined the p o s s i b i l i t y that cotreatment with Con A and ~ the activation of PI turnover beyond that seen with Con A alone.

enhanced Although

both CM and PMA act s i m i l a r l y in priming thymocytes in the presence of Con A 662

Vol, 141, No. 2, 1986 and stimulate

phosphorylation of

enhancing effect additional

of

activation

interleukin costimulators little

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

1 and with

pp55, we were unable to demonstrate any

CM on Con A induced PI of PKC through this IL2,

both of

turnover,

pathway.

which are

present

arguing against

We have observed that in

CM, can

Con A to upregulate IL2-R on thymocytes.

act

as

At present,

is known about the signalling mechanisms activated by these agents.

IL2 has also been suggested to act through PKC (24) but this point remains controversial

(25).

Our results are consistent

factors and PMA stimulate

parallel

with the notion that growth

pathways, resulting in the regulation of

the same key processes by two distinct

kinases.

Alternatively,

PKC may be

activated by growth factors through a process not involving PI turnover

(for

example, proteolytic conversion to the phospholipid independent form) (26, 27). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS- The authors wish to thank Dr. Ethan Shevach for the 7D4 antibody, and Dr. Allen Eckhardt for the anti-rat k chain. We also thank Ms. Curl ey Horton for technical assistance. T h i s work was supported by Veterans Administration General Medical Research Funds and by NIH Grant GM07184. REFERENCES

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Berridge, M.J. (1984) Biochem. J., 22Q, 345-360. Ku, Y., Kishimoto, A., Takai, Y., Ogawa, Y;, Kimura, S., and Nishizuka, Y. (1981) J. Immunol., 127, 1375-1379. Fisher, D.B. and Mueller, G.C. (1968) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 60, 1396-1402. Fisher, D.B. and Mueller, G.C. (1971) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 24__.88, 434-448. Maino, V.C., Hayman, M.J., and Crumpton, M.J. (1975) Biochem. J., 196, 247-252. Taylor, M.V., Metcalfe, J.C., Hesketh, T.R., Smith, G.A., and Moore, J.P. (1984) Nature (London), 312, 462-465. Farrar, W.L. and Ruscetti, F.W. (1986) J. Immunol., !36, 1266-1273. Mastro, A.M. and Mueller, G.C. (1974) Exp. Cell. Res., 88, 40-46. Truneh, A., Albert, F., Golstein, P., and Schmitt-Verhulst, A-M. (1985) Nature (London), 31.__33,318-320. Abb, J., Bayliss, G.J., and Deinhardt, F. (1979) J. Immunol., 122, 1639-1642. Orosz, C.F., Roopernian, D.C., and Bach, F.H. (1983) J. Immunol., 130, 1764-1769. Farrar, J.J., Mizel, S.B., Fuller-Farrar, J., Farrar, W.L., and Hilfiker, M.L. (1980) J. Immunol., 125, 793-798. Depper, J.M., Leonard, W.J., Kronke, M., Noguchi, P.D., Cunningham, R.E., Waldmann, T.R., and Greene, W.C. (1984) J. Immunol., 133, 3054-3061. Suzuki, T. and Cooper, M.D. (1985) J. Immunol., 134, ~TIF1-3119. Feister, A.J. and Sage, H.J., submitted for p u b l ~ t i o n . Malek, T.R., Robb, R.J., and Shevach, E.M. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 5694-5698. Springer, T.A., Battacharya, A., Cardoza, J.T., and Sanchez-Madrid, F. (1982) Hybridoma, ~, 257-273. 663

Vol. 141, No. 2, 1986 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27.

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

B i l l a h , M.M. and Lapetina, E.G. (1982) d. Biol. Chem., 257, 12705-12708. Esko, J.D. and Raetz, C.R.H. (1980) J. Biol. Chem., 257~474-4480. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Nature (London), 227, 680-685. Wolf, M., LeVine, H. I I I , May, W.W. d r . , Cuatrecasas, P., and Sayhoun, N. (1986) Nature (London), 317, 546-549. Tsien, R.Y., Pozzan, T., and Rink, T.J. (1982) Nature (London), 295, 68-7 I . Kishimoto, A., Takai, Y., Mori, T., Kikkawa, U., and Nishizuka, Y. (1980) J. Biol. Chem., 255, 2273-2276. Far~ar, W.L. and Anderson, W.B. (1985) Nature (London), 315, 233-235. M i l l s , G.B., Stewart, D.J., Mellors, A., and Gelfand, E.W. (1986) J. Immunol., 136, 3019-3024. Kishimoto,'--A-., Kajikawa, N., Shiota, M., and Nishizuka, Y. (1983) J. Biol. Chem., 258, 1156-1164. Melloni, E., Pontremoli, S., Michetti, M., Sacco, 0., Sparatore, B., Salamino, F., and Horecker, B.L. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 6435-6439.

664