Stratospheric methane and nitrous oxide

Stratospheric methane and nitrous oxide

Adv. Space Re:. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. (1)31—(1)44, 1993 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved. 0273-1177193 $15.00 Copyright ~ 1992 COSPAR STR...

583KB Sizes 1 Downloads 205 Views

Adv. Space Re:. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. (1)31—(1)44, 1993 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved.

0273-1177193 $15.00 Copyright ~ 1992 COSPAR

STRATOSPHERIC METHANE AND NITROUS OXIDE F. W. Taylor Department ofAtmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Phsycis, Oxford University, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford OXJ 3PU, U. K

ABSTRACT

A model of the abundances of nitrous oxide and methane in the stratosphere has been produced using data from the Stratospheric and Mesospheric Sounder on Nimbus 7, and reported in the Handbook for Map, Vol.31 (in press).

This paper describes the

data which went into the model, its limitations, and the general behaviour of methane and nitrous oxide in the middle atmosphere. Plans for preparing an improved model from new data expected from the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite program beginning in late 1991 are outlined.

(1)3 1

(1)32

F. W. Taylor

INTRODUCTION

A model of the abundances of nitrous oxide and methane in the stratosphere has been reported in the Handbook for Map, Vol.31

/1/.

The data for this came primarily from the Stratospheric

and Mesospheric Sounder on Nimbus 7 /2/. Rodgers

Taylor,

Dudhia &

(1986) described the model in an earlier paper /3/,

while Taylor and Dudhia /4/ performed an error analysis and analysed three and five year data sets for trends in the abundance of either species at any level in the range 20 to 0.2 mb pressure (25 to 62 kin altitude).

No trend was detected, but

this is not surprising since the errors in the observing technique are quite large and the changes which would be expected, even over a five year span, are only a few percent at most.

New measurements with better accuracy and precision are planned for the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite program beginning in late 1991.

With these, it will be possible to produce an

improved model with better global and height coverage, as well as smaller errors.

There will be a much better chance of

observing trends in the abundances, especially if the UARS measurements are extended beyond their initial 1.5 year goal, and in any case the UARS data set can be compared to the Nimbus observations from ten to fifteen years earlier.

Finally, it is

to be hoped that improvements in both satellite and in-situ techniques will lead to some resolution of the discrepancies with balloon data noted previously /4/.

Stratospheric CH

4 and N20

STRATOSPHERIC

(1)33

METHANE

All of the methane in the atmosphere originates

at the surface,

mostly in plant matter in humid regions (especially bogs and marshes) and in animal interiors, especially ruminants.

It is

estimated /5/ that 443 to 850 megatons is produced annually by these biological sources.

In addition, there is an estimated 16

to 110 megatons from non-biological (chiefly industrial) sources.

The total atmospheric burden of methane is about 4,600

megatons.

Removal is by reactions with hydroxyl, atomic oxygen, or atomic chlorine, or by photolysis, and the mean lifetime is around seven years.

The main product of methane destruction is water

vapour, but carbon monoxide (as an intermediate product, which finally itself is oxidised by OH to form carbon dioxide), and molecular hydrogen, are produced as well. showed that the sum

[2 CH4

+

H2O]

Jones et al /6/

is approximately conserved

aver a large range of latitudes and heights in the stratosphere, showing that the proportion of H2 produced is relatively small, as expected.

Methane is a strong infrared absorber in spectral regions where the atmosphere would otherwise be relatively transparent, and is therefore

an important component of the atmospheric

‘greenhouse’, coming after CO2 and H20.

Because the column

abundance of CH4 is small compared to the latter two gases, the

(1)34

F. W. Taylor

transmittances in the methane bands are not in general in the saturated part of the curve of growth /7/ and increases in the methane burden therefore have a proportionately larger incremental greenhouse contribution.

Thus, the fact that

methane is observed to be increasing near the surface by more than 1% per annum is of particular interest, as is its fate in the middle atmosphere.

Methane in the stratosphere exhibits a considerable natural variability, as we would expect from its injection from the troposphere at preferred places and times and its subsequent redistribution by the prevailing motions in the stratosphere. This, together with its intermediate lifetime (long enough to survive in parcels of air following global-scale trajectories, but not so long that the mixing ratio tends to become constant everywhere), make methane a good dynamical tracer/5/.

Nitrous oxide is also a species of intermediate lifetime (several decades in the stratosphere) which originates at the surface in a variety of natural and anthropogenic processes (fixation of nitrogen by bacteria, lightening, artificial fertilisers,

etc.).

Destruction in this case is mainly by

photolysis to form nitrogen and atomic oxygen.

Stratospheric CH

(1)35

4 and N20

GLOBAL

OBSERVATIONS

NITROUS

OF

STRATOSPHERIC

METHANE AND

OXIDE

The only global observations to date are from the from the Stratospheric and Mesospheric Sounder (SANS) on Nimbus 7 /2/. The SANS data extend from 50°Sto 70°Nin latitude, and have useful accuracy for a vertical range from 20 mb ( 0.2 mb

(

60 kin) for CH4

and 0.6 mb (

25 km) up to

53 kin) for N20.

The

accuracy, according to Jones and Pyle /8/, who combined conservative estimates of all of the known sources of error including spectroscopic and retrieval uncertainties, and noise due to instrumental sources and spacecraft jitter, is at best 20% for CH4 and 25% for N20. The corresponding precision is -3% for CH4 and -6% for N2O.

Comparisons have been made between SANS retrievals and other measurements, particularly from balloons. The in-situ and satellite data agree quite well near the top of the region of overlap (about 10 mb or 30 kin) but lower down discrepancies occur with the SANS amounts being systematically higher. The reason for this are not likely to be known until new observations are forthcoming/4/.

IMPLICATIONS

FOR

DYNAMICS

The dynamical implications of the SANS-observed fields of both methane and nitrous oxide have been discussed in general terms

(1)36

F. W. Taylor

by Taylor and Dudhia /9/

and Taylor /2/.

The former includes

colour maps of the residual distribution of methane (that is, the deviation from the mean value) as a function of height, latitude and season for zonal and time averaged observations by SANS, which are useful for understanding the following summary. The overall appearance of the plots for CH4

and N2O

is quite

similar, tending to confirm that their distributions are controlled more by dynamics than chemistry.

The general characteristics of the distributions feature negative gradients with latitude and with height, so that the general appearance is of a bulge over low latitudes. Following the monthly changes, the most noticeable trend is for the bulge to migrate towards the Summer hemisphere. This is due to the seasonal dependence of the mean circulation, a feature of which must be more rapid vertical transport in the summer than in the winter.

The total amounts of methane and nitrous oxide, and

hence presumably of all minor constituents having their sources in the troposphere, in each hemisphere rises and falls with the seasons.

Local maxima

relative to the mean occur at about 0.6

mb and 20°latitude, towards the end of Summer, i.e. in September/October in the Northern Hemisphere and March/April in the Southern (Plate 2 of ref. 9).

Minima occur at the same

latitudes six months later in each case. The

late summer low-

latitude maxima (in the N hemisphere at least) are accompanied by higher-latitude minima, and vice-versa. The 60°N minimum in

-

L

_‘

-

~

Stratospheric CH

~~-r

4 and N20

0.3~

(1)37

8

5 -

30

-



50S

u

r

40$

30$

~

~ i

20S

los

r

o

r

U

iON

20N

3aM

40N

50N

i

60N

3 70N

lat.i,tude

Fig..1

Mean latitudinal distribution of stratospheric methane

(ppmv) for March (solid line) and September (dashed line) /2/.

CH4

concentration could be produced by a mass of descending

air, which has spent an extended period of time in the stratosphere and so become depleted of CH4 by reaction with OH and other radicals. A single circulation cell with maximum upwelling at 200 and maximum downwelling at about 60°, building up in intensity during the summer and declining in the winter, would then be implied.

The reversal of the abundance maxima and

minima during late winter does not imply necessarily that the circulation reverses, since these are maxima and minima relative to the mean values at that particular latitude. In fact, the absolute amounts of methane and nitrous oxide are always lower at 60°N than at 200 N. Thus,the sense of the circulation is

(1)38

F. W. Taylor

always from equator to pole, only its strength changing with the solar energy available

to drive it.

The data also show that at

any given latitude, the zonal mean abundances tend to peak earlier at higher altitudes,

the opposite to the behaviour to be

expected if material from the troposphere was simply being advected vertically. There has therefore to be strong horizontal, poleward, advection as well.

This is qualitatively

consistent with theoretical expectations (c.f. fig.2).

l~6

L......—’

~

~

E~(O~

I

:!--

~--:.-~-

--

~

36

16

\~.

~

60

SUMMER

Fig.2

Streamlines

30

0

‘~::

30

LATITUDE (degrees)

_~: -

60

90

WINTER

(heavy lines) and net diabatic heating and

cooling, from the model of Garcia and Solomon /10/

Stratospheric CH

4 and N20

OUTSTANDING

(1)39

QUESTIONS

Next we summarize the main uncertainties which exist in the seasonal variation of of CH4 and N20 abundances, and the scientific questions which are raised thereby

The first three

arise from prominent features of the SANS fields, which are observed but remain only very marginally understood.

(1)

The

‘double peaked’ structure.

This is strongest in April

/8/ but can also be seen in other months (cf. fig.1). It appears to be due to downward velocities over the equator which occur as a consequence of the semi-annual oscillation in tropical temperature and zonal wind. /11,12/

(ii)

Other long-period oscillations.

At high altitudes (near

the 0.2 mb level) there is a pronounced semi-annual oscillation in the which is not directly related to the semi-annual oscillation in temperature at tropical latitudes.

The methane

SAO occurs at higher latitudes than the temperature SAO and is much more prominent in the Southern than the Northern Hemisphere.

(iii) Non-seasonal trends.

At

the highest levels at which CH4

was observed, i.e. 0.2 mb or around 60 kin,

all latitudes in

both hemispheres tend to have maxima around September, and minima around March. This effect may be associated with the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit, and if so it suggests that increased advection of ex-tropospheric air upwards due to

(1)40

F. W. Taylor

stronger heating

dominates increased photolytic

destruction,

since the solar intensity is greatest in the Northern Spring.

A number of other issues, not arising directly from SANS findings but relevant to the improvements to be desired in future reference models,

(iv)

and

Contribution N2O

can be listed as follows.

to greenhouse

effect.

The precise role of CH4

in determining the temperature structure of the

atmosphere through their contribution to heating and cooling rates by radiative transfer needs clarifying.

(v)

Trends in abundances.

The surface production rates of both

gases are thought to be increasing, although the existing global data is not precise enough to detect stratospheric changes /4/ and local measurements cannot adequately distinguish trends from seasonal and other fluctuations.

(vi)

Chemical budgets.

Much remains to be done to show that

the oxidation of methane is in detailed balance with the stratospheric water and carbon monoxide budgets, and the oxidation of nitrous oxide with nitric oxide and other species involved in ozone chemistry. determine,

for example,

It would be very valuable to

how much free hydrogen is produced in

the methane oxidation cycle, and how much N2O is changed by photolysis back to N2 after reaching the stratosphere.

Stratospheric CH

4 and N20

(vii)

Polar Dynamics.

(1)41

There is almost endless scope for

improving the use of CH4 and N20

as dynamical tracers by

obtaining higher precision and, particularly, higher spatial resolution measurements.

A particular priority must be to get

good coverage of the polar regions, in order to understand exchange processes going on in major phenomena like sudden warmings in northern winters and the onset and decay of the Antarctic ozone hole.

(viii)

Stratospheric-tropospheric exchange.

Water vapour has

traditionally been the focus for observations of species which allow inferences to be drawn about the mechanism whereby tropospheric air enters the stratosphere and vice-versa. Information will also be present in studies of methane and nitrous oxide gradients near the tropopause.

FUTURE

OBSERVATIONS

It is likely that all of the issues discussed above will be resolved, or at least addressed, by new data which will be obtained from satellite and other measurement programmes presently under development.

One of the most important, and

most imminent, is the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, which will carry an improved version of SANS (ISAMS) into orbit in August 1991.

The following table shows how the basic parameters

of ISANS compare to SANS.

Note in particular the improvement in

vertical resolution, in sensitivity, and in global coverage. see in more detail

how the expected instrumental

improvements

To

(1)42

affect

F. W. Taylor

the vertical

coverage and precision

of the CR4

and N20

measurements, test retrievals incorporating estimates of all known error sources have been carried out (C.J. Marks, private communication).

The results suggest that reliable profiles can

be expected from 15 to 50 km for N20 methane will be forthcoming.

and 15 to 60 km for

Within this range, the principal

source of error is likely to be uncertainties in the spectroscopic line parameters, which limit the precision to the region of 10%. ________________________

SANS

ISAMS

Vertical Resolution

10 km

2.4 km

Integration time (typical, for a signal to noise ratio of 100:1)

20 sec

2 sec

6

32

CO2. H~O,CH4, CO, N20

CO2. H20, CH4, CO, N20, NO, NO2, N205, H~JO3, 03, window

Number of detectors Species observed

Latitude coverage

Table 1.

50°S

-

70°N

80°S

-

80°N

Comparison between SANS and ISANS parameters.

For measurements close to the tropopause, channels chosen for their relative transparency, while the remaining opacity continues to be dominated by methane or nitrous oxide, need to be used.

The High-resolution Infra Red Dynamics Limb Sounder

(HIRDLS) intended for the Eos-A polar platform in 1997 includes this facility.

It has been calculated that the HIRIJLS CH4

Stratospheric CH

4 and N20

channel,

(1)43

for example, will measure down to heights as low as 7

to 8 kin above the surface under cloud-free conditions.

REFERENCES 1 (in press). 1.

Handbook for Map, Vol.3

2.

F.W. Taylor. Remote sounding of the middle atmosphere from

satellites: the Stratospheric and Mesospheric Sounder experiment on Nimbus 7.

3.

Surveys in Geophysics,

9, 123-148 (1987).

F.W. Taylor, Dudhia, A., and Rodgers, C.D. Reference models

for CH 4 49-62

4.

and N20 in the middle atmosphere. Adv. Sp. Res., 7, 9, (1987).

F.W. Taylor and A. Dudhia.

and Trends.

5.

‘Adv. Space Research, 10, 6, 65-70 (1990).

G. Brasseur and S. Solomon.

Atmosphere.

6.

Reference Model for CH4 and N20

D. Reidel, Dortrecht (1986).

R.L.Jones, J.A.Pyle, J.E.Harries, A.M.Zavody, J.M.Russell,

and J.C.Gille.

The water vapour budget of the stratosphere

studied using LIMS and SANS data. 112,

Aeronomy of the Middle

1127-1143

(1986).

Quart.J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,

(1)44

7.

F. W. Taylor

R.M. Goody and Y.L.Yung.

Atmospheric Radiation. Theoretical

Basis. Oxford University Press (1989).

8.

R.L.Jones and J.A.Pyle.

observations

of CR4

and N20

by

the Nimbus 7 SANS: A comparison with in situ data and twodimensional model calculations. J. Geophys. Res. 5279,

9.

(1985)

89, 5263

-

-

Taylor, F.W., and A.Dudhia. Satellite measurements of middle

atmosphere composition. 576,

,

Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond.,

A323, 567-

(1987)

10. R. Garcia and S. Solomon.

A numerical model of the zonally-

averaged dynamical and chemical structure of the middle atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res.,88, 1379,

11.

Gray, L.D. and

(1983).

J.A.Pyle. The semi-annual oscillation and

equatorial tracer distributions. Quart.J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 116, 387-407

12.

(1986).

S. Solomon, J.T. Kiehl, R.R. Garcia, and W. Grose. Tracer

transport by the diabatic circulation deduced from satellite observations. J. Atmos.

Sci.,

43, 1603-1617

(1986).