CataZysisTo&y, 7 (1990 ) 299-308 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam-Printed
299
in The Netherlands
STRENGTH AND PORE STRUCTURE OF MODELS FOR CARBON CATALYST SUPPORTS B. McENANEY, I. M. PICKUP AND L. BODSWORTH School of Materials
Science, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
SUMMARY The porous structure, measured by image analysis, and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, flexural strength and toughness) of carbons prepared from phenolic resins (novolaks) by a powder pressing method are compared to those of glassy carbons prepared by casting of liquid resins. Carbons with pore volume fractions up to -0.65 were prepared with mechanical properties which are comparable with those of many other engineering carbon materials. Porosity and mechanical properties can be varied by alterations to the fabrication parameters, e.g., pressing conditions, addition of pore forming agents and carbonisation rate. The combination of high porosity and good mechanical properties suggests that these carbons may be suitable as catalyst supports. INTRODUCTION Activated industrial
carbons are being used increasingly
processes,
e.g.,
as catalyst supports in
hydrodesuphurization
(ref.
1,2)
flue
gas
desulphurization (ref. 3) and ammonia synthesis (ref. 4). Advantages of activated carbons include their large surface areas and the wide range of surface chemical functionality.
Disadvantages
of activated carbons as catalyst supports include
variability in their properties, which reflects the heterogeneous activated
carbon
particular
precursors,
nature of most
and limited ability to tailor pore structure for
applications. Currently, there is interest in developing porous carbon
catalyst supports from polymeric resins, e.g., phenolic novolak powders, since it may be possible to tailor the pore structure of these carbons by careful control of the fabrication process. However, little is known about the relationships between porosity
and strength
performance
of these carbons
and hence
about their mechanical
in industrial situations. This paper reports a study of this subject
which is part of a wider study of the potentiality of resin-based carbons as catalyst supports. Resin carbons prepared by powder manufacturing
routes are related to
glassy carbons prepared from liquid resins by casting (ref. 5). Previous studies of the mechanical
properties of glassy carbons have been principally confined to
commercial materials and the wide variation in mechanical properties reported e.g., flexural strengths ranging from 42 to 130 MPa, probably reflect differences in precursors
and in manufacturing
0920-5861/90/$03.50
processes. Thus there is a need to improve
0 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
300
understanding
of strength-structure
relationships in the general class of carbon
materials prepared from polymeric resins, of which the novolak-based
carbons
are examples. Measurements
are reported
of the pore structure,
made using image
analysis, dynamic elastic modulus and flexural strength of models for porous carbon catalyst supports prepared from phenolic resins. Carbon beams suitable for mechanical testing were prepared from novolak resin powders. Some limited studies were also made on glassy carbon beams prepared from resol resin liquids and a commercial glassy carbon. EXPERIMENTAL Material6 Two types of resin were supplied by British Petroleum plc for this work: (i) a novolak powder (MRM 138) pre-mixed with hexamine hardener and (ii) a liquid resol resin J2018L which was hardened with a commercial catalyst, Phencat 10. In some cases polyethylene
glycol, PEG, was used as a pore-forming
agent. A
commercial glassy carbon, Vitreous Carbon VlO, manufactured by Le CarboneLorraine, France, was used for comparative studies; this carbon, which had been subjected to a nominal maximum heat-treatment temperature of 1000 oC, was reheated to this temperature in flowing nitrogen.
Manufacture ofthe carbon beama Two methods were used to produce carbon beams: a powder pressing route for those prepared from the novolak resin and a casting route for those prepared from the liquid resol resin. In the powder pressing method novolak resin powder (particle size up to 250 m)
was placed in a rectangular steel die, 50x10 mm, and
cold pressed at 580 MPa to produce resin beams with adequate green strength. The resin beams were carbonised in a horizontal tube furnace in an atmosphere of flowing nitrogen at a constant heating rate of either 15 or 60 oC/h to 1000 oC to produce rectangular carbon beams of approximate dimensions 40x9x3 mm. The influences of the following manufacturing and mechanical
properties
variables on the porosity
of the carbon beams were studied:
(i) pressing
conditions, (ii) carbonisation rate, (iii) addition to the resin of 10 wt% PEG as a pore-forming agent; (iv) it was also found that the properties of the carbons varied with the batch of the resin. This gave rise to four main classes of carbon designated by the letters B, C, D, and E, Table 1. Carbons in each class were also identified by a number denoting the carbonisation rate in oC/h, e.g., C.15.
301
TABLE 1 Classification of carbons ---------------_____~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~---------------Carbon R.&II Pressing/curing class
batch
conditions
Carbonisation ratea. oc7h
_____---__------------------------------------_--___-_____ Novolak resin based carbons B.15 1 b Cl5 C ii C.60 : C 60 D.15 2 C 15 2 D.60 C 60 E.15 2+10wt%PEG c 15 E.60 2+10wt%PEG c 60 Glassy carbons d d F” JiOl8L 15 : J2018L 15 : aged J2018L f 15 ~------------------------------------_-------------------a. to 1000 OC in flowing nitrogen. b. cold press at 340 MPa + hot press at 4 MPa and 200 oC for 5 min. c. cold press at 580 MPa d. unknown. Vitreous carbon VlO, Le Carbone Lorraine, France. e. 4 wt% Phencat hardener, cured for 24 h at 35 oC. f. e + stirring with a hollow glass rod. Glassy carbon beams were prepared from the liquid resin containing 10 wt% Phencat 10 hardener by casting between melinex-lined
perspex strips
which were separated by aluminium spacers, 3.5 mm thick. The resin was cured for 24 h at 35 oC to produce sheets 300x40x3.5 mm. Beams, 50x9x3.5 mm, cut from these sheets using a band saw, were packed in activated
charcoal particles in a
graphite crucible and carbonised at 15 oC/h to 1000 oC to produce class F carbons. Carbons of class G were prepared in a similar way except that the resin was stirred
prior to casting
using
a hollow
glass rod to increase
porosity
by
introducing air into the resin as it cured. Class H carbons were prepared in a similar way to class G except that an aged (more viscous) resin was used. The commercial glassy carbon, class A, was supplied as sheets 100x100x2 mm; each sheet was cut into beams, 50x10~2 mm, using a diamond wheel. Microstructure and norositv Microstructures
of the carbons were examined in reflected
using a Zeiss ICM inverted
light microscope.
Sections
white light
for microscopy
were
prepared by mounting samples of the carbons in a cold-setting resin and then polishing them to 1 pm surface finish using diamond paste. Quantitative
pore
structure parameters (see below) were measured on the polished sections using a Joyce-Loebl
Magiscan
2A image
analyser
linked
to a Zeiss Ultraphot
II
microscope. Using a 40x objective lens the resolution of the image analyser was 1 km. The effect of porosity dominated
by large
on the mechanical
macropores
properties
so that the image
of the carbons is
analysis
technique
is
appropriate. However, complete assessment of these carbons as catalyst supports requires requires characterisation of micropores and mesopores. Mechanical ox-one&es Before mechanical testing the carbon beams were ground and polished to 600 grade surface finish to remove surface and edge defects introduced during preparation standard
of the beams. Dynamic elastic modulus, E, was measured using a
sonic resonance
technique
for carbon materials
(ASTM C742-74).
Flexural strength, B, was measured on a model 1122 Instron in 3-point bending mode using a span of 30 mm and a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Novolak Representative
micrographs
of carbons are in Fig. 1. Total pore area
fractions and histograms of pore area distributions
were obtained from image
analysis; statistics were collected from about 10 fields each containing about 1000 pores. The majority of the pore area histograms, Fig. 2, are unimodal, although a few are multimodal. The ratio of Feret diameters of the pores, r, defines an aspect ratio or pore shape factor. For all of the carbons the modal value of r was -1.5 and the
maximum
approximately
value
was -3,
equi-axed
indicating
in shape.
This
that the majority is consistent
with
of pores
are
the globular
appearence of the pores, Fig. 1. Pore area fractions may be equated with pore volume fractions, P, if pores can be considered as an isotropically-dist~buted
array of spheres (ref. 6). This
assumption, which is implicit in much published work on image analysis, is fully justified for the spherical pores of the glassy carbons, Fig. 1, and is a reasonable assumption
for the globular pores in the novolak-based
carbons. The linear
dimension of a pore of area A can be represented by an equivalent circle diameter, D = (4A/x)1’2. Values of P and D obtained from the pore area histograms are in Table 2, together with the mechanical property measurements expressed as the mean and standard deviation of results from 6 to 35 beams. Referring
to mechanical
properties,
the greater degree of scatter for o
compared with E may be attributed to its sensitivity to variations in flaw sizes in the tensile faces of the carbon test beams. By contrast, the values of E are
Fig. 1. Representative micrographs of the resin-based carbons; magnifications: a = 200 pm; b = 100 pm; c = 125 p.
0
123456
Fig. 2. Representative pore area histograms for resin-based carbons.
304
TABLE 2 Mechanical properties and pore structure parameters ___-______-__--__--_--_----_--~------~---------------__--Flexural Carbon Elastic Pore modulusa,
class
strengtha,
E/GPa
volume fractiona. P
o/MPa
Equiv. circle
Toughness,
diameter, D/pm,
IU(J/mz) c
min mode max
---------------------------------------------------------Novolak resin-based carbons B.15 23.97f 2.63 6l.30f 24.19 18.32 + 1.13 35.96 f 15.65 c.15 14.14f 0.89 15.01+ 3.28 C.60 D.15 2099f 1.55 39.86 f 4.68 D.60 23.565 2.28 4456f 4.91 E.15 17.47f 1.41 29.77f 3.76 E.60 14.63f 0.98 27.83f 1.98
0.172f 0.512 + 0.629+ 0.305 f 0.318+ 0.392f 0.411+
0.058 0.024 0.057 0.027 0.056 0.023 0.024
8 100 280 12200360 12 b1000 12 80 300 12 80 300 12 90 360 12 140 360
138 80 50 ; 57 60
Glassy carbons 4 10 28.8 + 0.7 103.2 f 28.2 0.074f 0.014 2 4 10 16 ; 22.3 f 1.8 79.5 f 21.5 0.261 f 0.011 G 23.0 f 0.9 72.7 -+ 12.8 0.613x 0.018 4 b 80 H 22.9 f 0.7 64.9x 8.4 0.654x 0.016 3 b 100 -------------_---_---a. + one standard deviation; b. multi-modal pore area distribution. c. calculated from R = ( 02 x D,,, / E )-
12 14 :
determined by the resonant response of the whole beam and are therefore more representative significant
of the carbon
differences
between
microstructure. the properties
In the following of the carbons
discussion
refer to 95%
confidence levels using the t-test. Comparing pore structure parameters P and D for carbons C.15 and D.15 shows that porosity in the carbons varies with the batch of resin; carbon D.15 has a significantly smaller value of P and a narrower range of pore sizes, Table 2. The lower porosity for carbon D.15 is reflected in its significantly higher elastic modulus, E; no firm conclusions can be drawn about the differences in 0 because of the large scatter of results The majority of carbons were produced by cold pressing at 580 MPa. The effect of hot pressing, significantly,
c.f., carbons
Table 2, with significant
B.15 and C.15, is to reduce
P and D
increases in E and cr. Comparisons
carbon D.15 with E.15 and D.60 with E.60 show that volatilization
of
of the pore-
forming agent PEG during carbonisation produces significant increases in P and D, accompanied
by significant reductions in E and o. In the case of carbons of
class D and E a fourfold increase in carbonisation rate has small but significant effects upon the properties of the carbons. Increases in P when comparing carbon D.15 with D.60 and E.15 with E.60 are reflected in significant reductions in E,
305
although values of 0 are not significantly different from each other. For carbons of class D, there is no change in the range of pore sizes on increasing
the
carbonisation rate, although for carbons class E there is an increase in the modal value of D, Table 2. For class C carbons, however, increasing the carbonisation rate produces a significant increase in P and the development of long crack-like pores, Fig 1, which are reflected in the large D,,,
value for carbon C.60, Table 2.
The increase in porosity and the presence of large crack-like
pores result in
reductions in E and 0. The different effects of carbonisation rate between carbons of class C on the one hand and carbons of classes D and E on the other is another indication of the sensitivity of the properties of the carbons to resin batch.
Pores in the glassy carbons, Fig. 1, are spherical and smaller than those in the carbons formed from the novolak resins, Table 2. For carbon F the pores are relics of bubbles of gaseous condensation
products released during the curing
process which are trapped in the increasingly viscous resin. The morphology of the pores in the commercial glassy carbon A are similar to those of carbon F, suggesting that it has also been formed from a liquid resin by a casting route. The introduction
of bubbles into the resin by stirring with a hollow glass rod has
increased porosity in the carbons significantly, c.f., carbon F with carbons G and H, Table 2. However, the increased porosity of carbons G and H, compared to carbon F has no significant effect upon E, Table 2. This suggests that there are significant changes in the properties of the solid carbon which offset the expected decrement in properties due to increases in porosity. GENERAL DISCUSSION plastic Modulus and Porosity The variation of E with P for various brittle and semi-brittle materials has often been fitted to various equations, including linear and exponential equations of the form E= E,(l -bP)
(1)
E = E,‘exp (-b’P)
(2)
where E, and E,’ are estimates of the value of E at zero porosity and b and b’ are parameters related to pore shape. For the novolak-based carbons the reduction of E with increasing P, Fig. 3 is fitted equally well to either E / GPa = 27.6 (1 - 0.80 P)
(3)
or E/GPa=
29.5exp(-1.17P)
(4)
Eshelby (ref. 7) derived an equation which reduces to Equn (1) with b = 3 for
306
an isotropic body containing an isolated spherical pore. A form of Equn (2) has been derived by Buch (ref. 8) also for an isolated pore in an isotropic medium. For a spherical pore, b’ = 2.78. Note that, since P CC 1 for an isolated pore, both equations give similar values of b and b’ for spherical pores. Values of b and b’ less than -3 found for the novolak-based carbons show that decrements in E are less severe than predicted by these theories, which are however only valid for P CC 1. For large values of P the effects of porosity on E can be described (ref. 9) by E = E,(l - P)3
(5)
0 0.2
0.4
0.6
Pore volume fraction, P Figure 3. Effect of porosity on elastic modulus; open symbols, novolak-based carbons; closed symbols, glassy carbons; error bars show one standard deviation. a: Equn (6); b: Equn (3). Equn (5) has been used to describe the effect of P on E for porous glasses and cements (ref. 9). Equn. 5 is a poorer fit to the data than Equn. (3) and (4) giving E/GPa = 58.9 (l-P)3 This value of E, -59 GPa is unrealistically
(6) high, Fig. 3, which also shows that
Equn (6) over-predicts E at low P and underpredicts it at high P. This shows that the effects of P upon E for novolak-based carbons are less severe than those found for porous glasses and cements.The effects of P on E are also less than those found in a similar study of electrode graphites (ref. 10) This suggests that there are variations in the mechanical properties of the solid carbon material between the different carbon classes which partially offset the effects of porosity. A similar conclusion was reached in studies of the influence of porosity on the strength of metallurgical cokes (ref. 11). The few measurements of E and cs for glassy carbons
307
do not warrant fitting to Equn (1) and (21 but the small effect of P on E, Table 2, indicates that variations in the mechanical properties of the solid carbon material partially offset the effects of porosity in the case of the glassy carbons too. Flexural stre.nath and Porosity Although analogous expressions to Equn (1) and (21 have been proposed to fit Q - P data, the large scatter in the cr data for the resin carbons do not warrant such an approach. The strength of the carbons is influenced by the size of flaws in the tensile face of the specimen. In general the relationship between strength and flaw size, c, is given by the Griffith-Orowan equation a = (E~xcll”2
(71
where R is the fracture surface energy or toughness (J/m2) and is a measure of the resistance of the material to crack propagation. Lawn and Wilshaw (ref. 12) have classified materials with R values less than 10 J/m2 as brittle, while R values in the range lo-100 J/m2 denote semi-brittle materials. Crack propagation in a porous material is influenced by the size of the largest pores or cracks. The microstructure of the carbons, Fig. 1, and measurements of the pore shape factor, r, showed that the majority of pores in the carbons are approximately equi-axed. Thus a reasonable estimate of c in Equn. (7) is provided by Dmax, enabling R to be estimated, Table 2. Novolak-based
carbons are semi-brittle solids with R in the
range 50-80 Jlm2; hot pressing the resin, significantly increases toughness, c.f., carbons C.15 and B.15. The glassy carbons A and F are brittle materials whose R values are similar to those of soda-glass, while the toughness of carbons G and H approaches the values for novolak-based carbons. Values of E, cr and R for the resin carbons fall within the ranges found for many other engineering carbons and graphites: E -10-100 GPa; cr -10-100 MPa, R -50-300
J/m2 (ref. 10,13). Values of 0 for the resin carbons with P -0.5 are
greater than those found for metallurgical cokes with similar porosities using the diametral compression test (ref. 11). The combination of high porosity and good mechanical properties suggests that these carbons may be suitable as catalyst supports. CONCLUSIONS. Porous carbons can be prepared from phenolic resins (novolaks) by a powder pressing method. Carbons with pore volume fractions
up to P -0.65
can be
prepared with mechanical properties which are comparable with those of many other engineering
carbon materials.
Porosity
and mechanical
properties
are
308
dependent upon the batch of the resin and can be varied by alterations to the fabrication parameters, e.g., pressing conditions, addition of pore forming agents and carbonisation rata. The reasons for this are as follows. The successful
production
of resin-based
carbons requires
a carefully-
controlled conversion of the cross-linked structure of the resin to a cross-linked microfibrillar
structure of carbon layer planes in the carbon, so that the carbon
structure retains a “memory” of the molecular structure of the resin. The process is analogous to the conversion of a polymeric fibre to a carbon fibre, where a “memory” of the axial orientation oriented
carbon
layer planes.
of the polymer molecules is retained in the
It follows
that the physical
and mechanical
properties of the solid carbon material will vary with the chemical constitution and cross-linked
density of the cured resin. This in turn is influenced
by the
thermal history of the resin system from its fabrication up to the point of full cure and then by conditions during carbonisation. To produce monolithic
carbon artefacts with adequate strength requires
that the volatiles trapped in the resins during curing and those produced during carbonisation are able to diffuse through the porous structure of the material as it is converted carbonisation
to carbon. For glassy carbons this is achieved using very slow rates. This work has shown that satisfactory
carbons can be
produced from novolak resins using fast carbonisation rates, provided that open porous structures are developed in the resin at the curing stage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Mr S R Tennison and Dr T J Mays for useful discussions and British Petroleum plc and the SERC for financial support. REFERENCES. 1. F.J. Derbyshire, V.H.J. de Beer, G.M.K. Abotsi, A.W. Scaroni J.M. Solar, D.J. Skrovanek, Appl. Catal., 27, (1986) 117. 2. H. Juntgen, Fuel, 65, (1986) 1436. 3. K. Knoblauch, E. Richter and H. Juntgen, Fuel, 60 (1981) 832. 4. A I. Foster, P.G. James, J.J. McCarrol and S.R. Tennison, US Patent 4163775, 1979. G.M. Jenkins and K. Kawamura, Polymeric carbons - carbons, glass and char., Cambridge University Press, 1976. E.E. Underwood, Quantitative Stereology., Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA, 1970. J.D. Eshelby, Proc. Roy. Sot. A241, !957) 376; idem.. ibirl, A252 (1959) 561. J. D. Buch, Extended abstracts 16th American carbon conference, San Diego, American Carbon Society (1983) 400. K. Kendall, A.J. Howard, J.D. Birchall, Phil. Trans. Roy. Sot., London, A310, (1983) 139. 10. Y. Yin, M.Phil thesis, University of Bath, 1987. 11. J.W. Patrick and A. Walker, Carbon, 27, (1989) 117. 12. B.R. Lawn and T.R. Wilshaw, Fracture of brittle solids, Cambridge University Press, 1975. 13. J. E. Brocklehurst, Chem. Phys. Carbon, 13 (1977) 145.