Carbohydrate
Research,
339
210 (1991) 339-347
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
Note
Structural analysis of a second acidic exopolysaccharide of Rhizohium meliloti that can function in alfalfa root nodule invasion B. Levery *’ , Hangjun
Steven
Hakomori*j** * The Bionwmhrane
Institute,
isrry’, Microbiologist.
Zhan *, Chi Chang
Lee*, John
201 Elliotr Ave W, Searfle,
und Purhohioloy,
**, Uniwrsirv
A: LeighI,
WA 98119 [U.S.A.)
_ of Washington,
and Sen-itiroh
of’Chem-
und Departments
Sr~artle, WA 98 195 (U.S.A.)
(Received May 23rd, 1990; accepted for publication in revised form September I st. 1990)
Symbiotic
bacteria
rides that appear produce
of the genus Rhizohium
to be essential
a calcofluor-binding
secrete a variety
of acidic polysaccha-
for root nodulation’-‘.
Normal strains of R. mefiloti (EPS), succinoglycan, a polymer hav-
exopolysaccharide
ing an octasaccharide /?-Glc-( 1-3)~/?-Glc-(
repeating unit with the sequence [4,6-O-( 1-carboxyethylidene)1-3)~/I?-Glc-( I -+6)+Glc-( l-6)]-4)-P-Glc-( 1~4)+Glc-( l-+4)-
&Glc-(
1 -+.Each repeating
1+3)-/?-Glc-(
one acetyl mutants,
and
one succinyl
which
glycan,
either
produce
form “empty”
they contain ride (EPSb),
results
describe
on alfalfa
are also
have been
the structural
monosaccharide
capable
of them
reported
Anul.ysis ojmonosucchuride acidic methanolysis,
Fig. 1. Peaks derivatives identifiable. Dudman pyranoside consistent acetal
methyl whose
0008-62 IS:‘91‘$03.50
g.l.c.-e.i.m.s.
analysis
times and e.i. mass spectra
spectra
were found
identification spectrum
@ 1991
on alfalfa,
succinoglycan’2.
Virtually
In this paper,
spectroscopy,
we
along with
composition. ~ When native EPSb was subjected to by per-O-trimethylsilylation of the resultant
methyl
gave the pattern were readily
shown
assignable
in as
by two major peaks not immediately to match
closely
those
observed
by
4,6-O-( l-carboxyethylidene)-o-galacto-
esters, while the g.1.c. peak ratios
in the I-D ‘H-n.m.r.
exopolysaccha-
nodules
and Walker”.
and
followed
and Lacey14 for the anomeric with the earlier
since
the isolation
by g.l.c.~m.s.
and glucose were followed
The e.i. mass methyl
of producing
exe
of the
fixation,
distinct
of EPSb by ‘H-n.m.r.
glycosides,
retention
of galactose
we reported
nitrogen-fixing
by Glazebrook
analysis
meliloti form
in nitrogen
a structurally
of forming
characterization
anhydrous
monosaccharide
secreting
with approximately
or a non-succinylated
Recently,
are incapable
and methylation
substituted
sites8’9. Rhizohium
that are ineffective
bacteroids’,‘“.“.
of R. meliloti mutants, with
a number
identical
unit is further
at undetermined
no succinoglycan
nodules
no intracellular
characterization although
group
of a resonance
appeared
similar.
for the methyl
of EPSb”.
Elsevier Science Publishers 9.V
This result was group of pyruvic
310
341
NOTE
The identification of the two peaks as arising from I-carboxyethylidene derivatives was confirmed by analysis using g.l.c.-c.i.m.s. with isobutane as reagent gas. The c.i. mass spectra of both derivatives were characterized by quasimolecular ions at m,/z 423 (M-H -) and 479 (MC,H,+), corresponding to the correct calculated nominal mass of 422 a.m.u. (see Fig. 2C). These peaks were accompanied by abundant fragments from loss of neutral MeOH (m/z 391) and methyl formate (mj: 363) (Scheme 1). This pattern can be contrasted with that typical for methyl per-O-trimethylsilyl hexopyranosides (see Fig. 2A), with quasimolecular ions at m/z 483 (M.H ‘) and 539 (MC&I;‘), accompanied by fragments for neutral losses of CH, (m/z 467), MeOH (m/z 451), and, in most cases, an additional loss of (CH~)~HSiOCH~) (I%/=361).
r
+
0
MH+ = 423 a.m.u OMe, H
391 a.m.u
Scheme 1
Coniponent sugar c u/u) 4,6-O-I-curbo~yethJ?[ihncGal (I) Native (21 Au. HOAc treated
51.6
12.1
36.3
54.8
45.2
not detected
-
‘1.
j
-‘.3.!
1.
.I
!.-l,
-,!
,?
_,
,,:_
343
NOTE
each of 3-proton singlets at typical chemical shifts for acetate (2.152 p.p.m.) and pyruvate (1.459 p.p.m.) were initially observed in the spectrum of intact EPSb, as reported previously”. On heating, the latter peak was seen to decay, being replaced by a singlet at 1.464 p.p.m. (free pyruvate), while the former peak was replaced by a singlet at 1.907 p.p.m. (free acetate). In a short time, the pyruvate groupwascompletely lost, even when I OOmMphosphate buffer at pD 9.8 was used as solvent. Therefore, all spectra for this study were acquired after complete hydrolysis of the pyruvic acetal. The downfield portion of a resolution-enhanced 1-D n.m.r. spectrum of depyruvated EPSb is reproduced in Fig. 3. Unambiguous assignments for all proton resonances in the ‘I-I-n.m.r. spectrum of depyruvated EPSb were obtained by successive applications of the Z-D DQF-PSCOSY, RELAY, TOCSY, and TQF-COSY sequences. Results from the latter two experiments are reproduced in Fig. 4A, and the assignments are summarized in Table II. Only two spin-systems were observed, which could be followed from anomeric resonances at 5.42 and 4.75 p.p.m.; analysis of splitting constants made it clear that these were from a-Gal and P-Glc residues, respectively. It was hoped that PS-NOESY data would give indications of linkage sites by displaying clear interglycosidicenhancements. The expected ok-diagonal peaks were indeed observed, one interglycosidic crossrelaxation for each anomeric proton {Fig. 4B). However, in each case the n.0.e. cross peak corresponded to a pair of degenerate resonances, to the cc-Gal H-2/3 from b-Glc H-l, and to the /?-Glc H-3/4 from a-Gal H-l. Thus, it was impossible to specify more precisely the inter-residue linkage sites. This was left to methylation analysis, as described next. Merhylurion analysis. -- Following successive permethylation, hydrolysis, reduction, and acetylation, intact EPSb yielded a simple pattern of partially methylated alditoi acetates (PMAAs): mainly 2,4,6-tri-0-Me-Glc and 2-mono-O-Me-Gal, with a small amount of 2,4,6-tri-O-Me-Gal. When EPSb was depyruvated by acid treatment prior to permethylation, only 2,4,6-tri-0-Me-Glc and a-Gal were obtained. This clearly indicates +3Glc and -+3Gal linkages exclusively, while confirming the 4,6-location of the I-carboxyethylidene groups. These results show that EPSb has a simple repeating-unit structure, -+3Galcc1-+3Glc/3l-+ 4, 5’ C CH/, >OIH confirming our previous proposal”. An acetate group is present at an as yet undetermined site. The same structure was also proposed by Glazebrook and Walker13, who further specified the site of acetylation as the &position of /3-Glc. Details of that structure elucidation appeared just as this paper was being submittedn’. It is interesting to consider how EPSb can perform the same function as the R. ~~~ilo~~succinoglycan, which has a considerably more complex octasaccharidc repeat-
Il-4: d I-1 . i
TQF.
! t
i 5.20
5.00
4.m
4.50
4.40
4.20
4.00
3
85
3.60
3
46
5. &x
p.p_m.
345
NOTE
ing-unit.
As pointed
feature
out by Glazebrook
in common,
might represent
and Walker’j,
the /I-Glc-(l-3)-Gal
a common
if the corresponding
recognition
OAc groups
occupy
the corresponding
pyruvated
as in EPSb. Thus, the proposed
ring (around
galactose
topology,
particularly is not a rather
only the unmodified of the glucosyl
part of the galactose residue.
might be questionable.
and strains
host-related
to which
process,
succinoglycan
structures
the extent
they suggest
would have to occupy
even within the family of related succinoglycan of Rhizohia,
will be required
produced
for clarification
Whether
this is
It is worth noting that, by different
specificity
shared US. unique features is an issue still open to debate15.“. experiments, along with a careful analysis of the three-dimensional of the polysaccharides,
have one
which
in both polysaccharides.
in R. meliloti
determinant
portion
specificity
invasion
the same position residue
including
HO-2), and a contiguous
sufficient to confer the required
linkage,
site in the nodule
However,
small area of molecular
the two structures
disaccharide
species
is conferred
by
Further biological structural features
of this question.
EXPERIMENTAL
strain
Isolution
ofEPSh.~ EPSb was isolated from culture supernatants
Rm7011
exoA (pMuc)
Dqqwvation.
-
as previously
Samples
of EPSb were treated
heated in a sealed tube for 20 hat 100”. Following at 37”, using EtOH
as co-distallant,
Monosaccharide
samples
analysis. -To
of R. meliloti
described”. with 10% v/v aq. HOAc (1 mL),
removal
of HOAc by flushing with N?
were dried in cucuo over NaOH
samples
for 3 h.
of EPSb, before and after depyruvation
(100 pg each), in 13 x 100 test tubes with Teflon-lined screw caps, were added M HCl in anhydrous MeOH (1 .O mL). These were sealed and heated for 16 h at 80”. The solutions were made neutral were centrifuged with MeOH under
and the MeOH
N?, and then dried were converted
selective detector column either
supernatant
into
with those
compounds’4. Hewlett-Packard
pertrimethylsilyl
program
by characteristic
of standard
Alternatively,
ethersi8.”
the precipitate
compounds,
system operating
once
in clean tubes
analyzed
methyl by g.l.c.-
to a 5970B mass-
phase fused silica capillary Monosaccharide
times and mass spectra compared
or with spectra
the analysis
and
interfaced
150-250“ at 4”jmin).
retention
was performed
58905 gas chromatograph
mass spectrometer/data
washing
were evaporated
using a 30-m DB-5 bonded
temperature
were identified
solutions
5890A gas chromatograph
(g.l.c.-MSD),
(splitless injection,
removed,
MeOH
in uucuo over P,O, for 2 h. The monosaccharide
on a Hewlett-Packard
derivatives
and Ac,O (50 ,uL) was added. After 6 h at 4”, the tubes
(1 .O mL). The combined
glycosides e.i.m.s.
with Ag$O,,
interfaced
published
on a system
for pyruvated consisting
of a
to a Jeol HX-1 lo/DA-5000
in the chemical-ionization
(isobutane)
mode.
Fig. 4. Sections of 2-D ‘H-n.m.r. spectra of depyruvated EPSb: A, upper left-hand sector, TQF-COSY; lower right-hand sector, TOCSY; B, NOESY. J, in panel B, refers to a cross-peak corresponding mainly to J coupling between P-Glc H-l and H-2 which was not suppressed; int. refers to interglycosidic dipolar correlations.
NOTE
347
REFERENCES I 2 3 4 5
J. A. Leigh, E. R. Signer, and G. C. Walker, Proc. Nutl. Acad. SC;. USA, 82 (1985) 6231-6235. J. A. Leigh, J. W. Reed, J. F. Hanks, A. M. Hirsch, and G. C. Walker, CelI, 51 (1987) 579-587. A. K. Chakravorty, W. Zurkowski, J. Shine, and B. G. Rolfe. J. Mol. A,&. Genet., I (1982) 5855596. H. Chen, M. Batley, J. Redmond, and B. G. Rolfe, .I. PIant Ph~md., 120 (1985) 331 --349. D. Borthakur, C. E. Barber, J. W. Lamb, M. J. Daniel% J. A. Downie. and A. W. B. Johnston, Mol. Gen. Genel., 203 (1986) 32(t323. 6 S. P. Djordjevic. H. Chen, M. Batley, J. W. Redmond, and B. G. Rolfe, J. Eucleriol., 169 (1987) 53-60. 7 J. A. Downie, and A. W. B. Johnston, Ceil, 47 (1986) 153 154. 8 P. Aman, M. McNeil, L. Franzen. A. G. Darvill, and I’. Albersheim, Curhohydr. Res., 95 (1981)2633282. 9 P.-E. Jansson, L. Kenne, B. Lindberg, H. Ljunggren, J. Liinngren, U. Ruden, and S. Svensson. 1. Am. Chem. Sot., 99 (1977) 3812~ 3815. IO T. M. Finan. A. M. Hirsch. J. A. Leigh, E. Johansen. G. A. Kuldau, S. Deggan, G. C. Walker, and E. R. Signer, Cell. 40 (1985) X69-877. 11 J. A. Leigh, and C. C. Lee, J. Bucteriol., 170 (198X) 332773332. 12 H. Zhan, S. B. Levery, C. C. Lee, and J. A. Leigh, Proc. Null. Aad. Sri. USA, 86 (1989) 3055-3059. 13 J. Glazebrook, and G. C. Walker, Cell, 56 (1989) 661-672. I4 W. F. Dudman, and M. J. Lacey, Cnrhohydr. Res., 145 (1986) 175191. 15 M. McNeil, J. Darvill, A. G. Darvill, P. Albersheim, R. Vanveen. P. Hooykaas. R. Schilperoort, and A. Dell, Curhohqdr. Res., 146 (1986) 307-326. I6 G.-R. Her, J. Glazebrook, G. C. Walker, and V. N. Reinhold, Curhohydr. Res., 198 (1990) 305-312. 17 S. Philip-Hollingsworth, R. 1. Hollingsworth, and F. B. Dazzo, J. Biol. Chem., 264 (1989) 1461-1466. I8 C. C. Sweeley, R. Bentley, M. Makita, and W. W Wells, J. Am. Chem. Sot.. 85 (1963) 249772507. 19 R. A. Lame. W. J. Esselman, and C. C. Sweeley, Mcth. Enzymol. 28 (1963) 159- 167. 20 S. Hakomori, J. Biochem. /Tokyo), 55 (1964) 205 208. 21 S. B. Levery, and S. Hakomori. Method.7 Enzymol., I38 (1987) 13-25 22 H. Clausen. S. B. Levery, E. D. Nudelman, M. R. Stroud, M. E. K. Salyan, and S. Hakomori, J. Biol. Chem., 262 (1987) 14228 14234. 23 H. Bjiirndal, C. G. Hellerqvist, B. Lindberg, and S. Svensson, Angevv. Chrm. Inrl. Ed. Eng., 9 (1970) 61@619. 24 P.-E. Jansson, L. Kenne, H. Liedgren, B. Lindberg. and J. Liinngren, Chem. Commun. Urzic. Stockholm, 8 (1976) l-75. 25 D. Marion, and K. Wiithrich, Biochem. Biophys. Rrr. Commun.. I 13 (1983)967 -974. 26 U. Piantini. 0. W. Sorensen, and R. R. Ernst, J. Am. Chem. Sot.. 104 (1982) 68OC-6801. 27 M. Rance, 0. W. Sorensen. G. Bodenhausen, G. Wagner, R. R. Ernst, and K. Wiithrich, B&hem. Biophys. Rex. Commun., I 17 (I 983) 479 485. 28 G. Eich, G. Bodenhausen, and R. R. Ernst, J. Am. Chem. .%x. 104 (1982) 3731--3732. 29 A. Bax, and G. Drobny, J. Mugn. Reson., 61 (1985) 306-320. 30 L. Braunschweiler, and R. R. Ernst, J. Magn. Re.con., 53 (1983) 521 528. 31 A. Bax, and D. G. Davis, J. Magn. Reson., 65 (1985) 355%360. 32 A. J. Shaka, and R. Freeman. J. Magn. Resort., 51 (1983) 1699173. 33 G. Bodenhausen. H. Kogler, and R. R. Ernst, J. Mqn. Resan.. 58 (1984) 37&388.