Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4

Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4

Accepted Manuscript Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4 Jalila Chékir-Mzali, Karima Horchani-Naifer, Mokhtar Férid PII: DOI: ...

1MB Sizes 2 Downloads 50 Views

Accepted Manuscript Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4 Jalila Chékir-Mzali, Karima Horchani-Naifer, Mokhtar Férid PII: DOI: Reference:

S0925-8388(14)01320-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.213 JALCOM 31402

To appear in: Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

4 February 2014 29 May 2014 29 May 2014

Please cite this article as: J. Chékir-Mzali, K. Horchani-Naifer, M. Férid, Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4, (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.213

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

Structural study and spectroscopic properties of NH4Er(PO3)4

2

Jalila Chékir-Mzali*, Karima Horchani-Naifer and Mokhtar Férid

3

Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Mineral Materials and their Applications, National

4

Research Center in Materials Sciences, Technopole Borj Cedria B.P. 73- 8027 Soliman,

5

Tunisia.

6

Corresponding author: jalila Chékir-Mzali E-mail: [email protected]

7

8

Tèl. : +216 --- 7932--- 5470

9

Abstract

10

Single crystals of NH4Er(PO3)4 polyphosphate have been prepared by the flux method

11

and its structural and physical properties have been investigated. This compound crystallizes

12

in the monoclinic system, with space group P21/n and the following parameters:

13

10.259(3) Å, b = 8.884(3) Å, c = 10.910(3) Å, β = 106.27(1)°, V = 954.5(5) Å3 and Z = 4. Its

14

structure is characterized by PO4 phosphate groups which are assembled through common

15

vertices to form (PO3)n spiral chains running along the [101] direction. These chains are

16

linked to each other by ErO8 polyhedra through common corners. In such a way the resulting

17

3D framework forms large tunnels, parallel to the [100] direction, where the NH4 + ions are

18

located. Raman and FT-IR spectra have been registered and discussed. Absorption, excitation

19

and emission spectra of NH4Er(PO3)4 have been investigated for the first time: they show

20

bands characteristics of the Er3+ ions. Decay curves for 2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 levels of Er3+ ion

21

have also been studied.

22

Keywords: Rare earths; Polyphosphate; X-ray diffraction; Vibrational spectroscopy;

23

Spectroscopic property.

a =

24

1. Introduction

25

Presently, Rare earth doped materials attract much attention due to their practical importance

26

in many fields such as novel three-dimensional solid-state displays and biomedical multi-

27

color imaging [1], lasers materials [2]. Particularly, the Er3+ attracts the attention of scientists

28

due to their infrared spectral emission around 1530 nm through the 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition

29

which exhibit extensive applications used in wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM)

30

network applications [3], laser applications [4] and waveguide amplifier applications [5].

31

Due to their rich energy level structure, the spectroscopy of the trivalent erbium in the

32

ultraviolet, visible and infrared (IR) wavelength range, is studied in many matrices such as

33

glasses [6] and [7], oxides [8], silicates [9], phosphates [10].

34

Moreover some of them present interesting optical properties due to the relatively

35

large Ln-Ln distances [11-12]. In addition, they show a high stability under normal conditions

36

of temperature humidity, and perfect crystallinity. Besides, they are not water soluble as may

37

be inferred from their estimated molecular weights and they all produce glasses when heated

38

to their melting points. Due to these interesting reasons, many works have been devoted to the

39

study of alkali rare earths polyphosphates. For example, LiMІІІ(PO3)4 (MІІІ = Y, Er [13], La

40

[14], Tb [15], Pr [16], Sm [17], Gd [18], Yb [19], Nd [20], Mn [21] and NH4MІІІ(PO3)4 (MІІІ

41

= Er [22], Bi [23], Ce [24] have been reported recently. They crystallize in the monoclinic

42

system with C2/c space group for LiYb(PO3)4 and LiEr(PO3)4 compounds. Their structure

43

consist of 3D frameworks made up of spiral (PO3)n chains linked by MIIIO8 polyhedra and the

44

Li atoms are tetra-coortinated [19]. NH4Bi(PO3)4 and NH4Ce(PO3)4 crystallize in the non-

45

conventional space group P21/n [23, 24]. In the cerium phosphate, the rare earth atoms are

46

eight coordinated while the NH4 groups have nine oxygen neighbors. Infinite (PO3)n chains

47

with a period of eight tetrahedral spread along the [101] direction.

48

NH4Er(PO3)4 (type: IV) is a member of the MІMІІІ(PO3)4 family. It has been previously

49

synthesized as powder by thermal method [22]. In this paper, we report its chemical

50

preparation as single crystals and its crystal structure. Its characterization by IR and Raman

51

and its photoluminescence study are also reported.

52

2. Experimental

53

2.1. Synthesis

54

Single crystals of NH4Er(PO3)4 have been synthesized by the flux method starting

55

from a mixture of 3g of (NH4)2 HPO4 and 0.4 g of erbium oxide Er2O3 which were slowly

56

added to 13 ml of phosphoric acid H3PO4 (85%). This mixture was homogenized, transferred

57

into a vitreous carbon crucible, and placed in a muffle furnace for 3h at 473 K and

58

subsequently heated to 623K and kept at this temperature during 7 days before switching off

59

the furnace. After few hours of decreasing temperature, purple and parallelepiped crystals

60

were obtained by washing the product in boiling water to remove the excess of phosphoric

61

acid.

62

2.2. Measurements

63

All measurements were recorded at RT. The X-ray data were collected on a crystal of

64

dimensions 0.20 mm × 0.18 mm × 0.16 mm, by an Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer using

65

Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). A total of 3550 unique reflections was measured using the

66

w/2θ scan type for 2θmax = 33.06 but only 3356 reflections were considered as observed

67

according to the statistic criterion [I >2σ (I)]. The systematic absence of k =2n+1 for 0 k 0

68

and h = 2n+1 for h 0 l indicated the monoclinic space group P21/n. The intensity data were

69

corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The structure solution was performed by

70

SHELXS97 [25], and subsequently refined by SHELXL97 [26]. These two programs are

71

included in the basis of WINGX [27]. The positions of the erbium atoms were obtained using

72

the Patterson heavy atom method. Successive Fourier analysis allowed the localization of the

73

remaining atoms. A last cycle of refinement, including anisotropic thermal parameters for all

74

non hydrogen atoms, led to the reliability factors R1 = 0.0308 and wR2= 0.0923. The

75

crystallographic data and recording conditions are reported in Table 1. The coordinates of

76

atoms, inter-atomic distances and bond angles are reported in Tables 2, and 3 respectively.

77

The graphic structure was created by DIAMOND program [28].

78

The IR spectrum of the synthesized sample was recorded by a Perkin Elmer

79

(FTIR2000) spectrometer in the range of 4000−400 cm-1 using KBr pellets. The Raman and

80

PL spectra were recorded using HORIBA Scientific (labRAM HR) spectrometer equipped

81

with Laser source (632 nm and 325nm) and CCD detector. Absorbance spectrum was

82

registered on a sintered pellet of polycrystalline powders in a wavelength range of 250–

83

1800nm, using a double-beam Lambda 950 Series UV/Vis & UV/Vis/NIR Perkin-Elmer

84

Spectrophotometer with a diffuse reflectance accessory integrating sphere. The IR

85

photoluminescence measurement was performed under 488nm line of an argon ion Ar + laser

86

as excitation source. The excitation spectrum and delay time curves were registered by a Perkin-

87

Elmer spectrophotometer (LS 55) with Xenon lamp (200-700 nm).

88

3. Results and discussion

89

3.1. Description of the structure

90

NH4Er(PO3)4 crystallizes in the monoclinic system with space group P21/n. The

91

asymmetric unit (Table 2) contains 22 atomic positions including one for N, four for H, one

92

for Er, four for P and twelve for O. All these atoms occupy general positions.

93

The structure as projected along the [100] direction is viewed in Figure 1 showing the

94

great complexity of the [Er(PO3)4]-∝ anionic framework, consisted by (PO3)n infinite spiral

95

units, made of corner-sharing PO4 tetrahedra. Such units are arranged parallel to the

96

crystallographic b-direction, around the 2 1 helicoidal axis (Fig. 2). Their connection is ensured

97

by the ErO8 polyhedra through Er–O–P links. This structure can be considered as an ordered

98

defect variant of threefold supercell of monazite [MIIIPO4] [29].

99

It is worth pointing out that, despite their different crystal structures, the

100

NH4Ln(PO3)4 (Ln = Er (this work), Ce [24], Bi [23], Gd [30]) ammonium rare earth

101

phosphates are all exhibiting three-dimensional frameworks which form large tunnels where

102

the NH4 + groups are located. These tunnels, which are parallel to the [101] direction, are

103

formed by infinite screw (PO3)∝ chains joined to each other by LnO8 polyahedra.

104

3.1.1 Anionic groups

105

The bond distances and angles in NH4Er(PO3)4 are given in Table 3. All phosphorus

106

atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated forming phosphate tetrahedra. Each tetrahedron is

107

connected by two common corners in cis position to two other tetrahedra giving rise to a

108

twisted (PO3)n- chain.

109

The P-O distances in the PO4 tetrahedra (Table3) can be divided into two groups:

110

linking distances (P–O)(Lij), that range from 1.566(4) to 1.592(5) (Å), and exterior distances

111

(P–O)(Eij) ranging from 1.448(4) to 1.474(4) (Å), where O(Lij ) denotes the O atom that links

112

Pi with Pj and O(Eij ) corresponds to the jth in O atom exterior to the chain and bonded to

113

phosphorus Pi (Fig. 3). The O-P-O angles vary from 97.3(8)° to 121.1(1)°. The calculation of

114

the distortion indices (ID) for the O–P–O angles and the O–O and P–O distances [DI (O–P–

115

O), DI (O–O) and DI (P–O), respectively] (Table 4) according to the Baur method [31]

116

shows the relative deformation of all the PO4 tetrahedra.

117

3.1.2 Er3+ and NH4+ environments

118

In the titled structure, the erbium and ammonium atoms are located between (PO3)4-

119

chains to ensure the cohesion and the neutrality of the structure. The ErO8 polyhedra are

120

isolated from each other. The Er-O distances range from 2.333(1) to 2.475(8) (Å) (Table 3).

121

Corresponding mean distance = 2.406(5) Å is somewhat higher than those observed in

122

other Erbium phosphates [32], showing that the Er–O bonds are weakened due to the highly

123

covalent character of the antagonist P–O bonds, as determined for both NH4+ and H2PO4−

124

groups of the NH4H2PO4 compound during the crystallization of ADP crystals [33, 34].

125

According to Errandonea et al. [35], the bulk modulus can be estimated from Er-

126

O average distance = d by the equation B0 = 610 * Z / d^3, where B0 is the bulk modulus

127

in GPa and Z the formal charge of Er = 3. The calculation leads to B0 = 130 GPa.

128

The shortest distance between erbium atoms is Er…Er = 5.695 Å. Its comparison with

129

other related compound shows that the evolution of this distance is consistent with the radii of

130

the Ln3+ ion. In fact, the Er…Er distance is slightly higher than the shortest Y…Y distance of

131

5.687(Å) observed in NH4Y(PO3)4 [36] but lower than that of 5.739 (Å) reported for Gd…Gd

132

distance in NH4Gd(PO3)4 [30]. This evolution is consistent with the fact that r(Gd3+) > r(Er3+)

133

> r(Y3+).

134

The NH4+ cationic group is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms with N−O distances

135

ranging from 2.911 (Å) to 3.326 (Å) (Fig. 1). Similar coordination for ammonium has already

136

been observed in NH4Y(PO3)4 [36]. We note that the NH4 tetrahedron is slightly distorted as

137

N−H−N angles shows 81.9(6) to 141.3(6) °. The positions of the hydrogen atoms attached to

138

nitrogen were determined from a difference Fourier map and were refined isotropically.

139

3.1.3 Bond valence analysis

140

The bond valence sums (BVS) for the erbium and phosphors atoms were calculated by

141

the Brown and Alttermat method [37] using the cation-oxygen distances obtained by X-ray

142

diffraction. The obtained values for P (Table 5) range from 5.039 to 5.149 with an average

143

value of 5.084, close to the ideal value of 5. The BVS calculated for Erbium (2.776), for

144

oxygen (-1.919) are in accordance with their formal charges of +3 and -2, respectively.

145

3.2. Vibrational characterization of NH4Er(PO3)4

146

The IR and Raman spectra for NH4Er(PO3)4 are shown in Figures 4 and 5,

147

respectively. The frequencies for the corresponding bands are given in Table 6. The observed

148

bands clearly indicate the existence of infinite chains of PO4 tetrahedra bound by bridging

149

oxygen [38]. Moreover, the IR absorption spectrum is characterized by the appearance of an

150

intense and strong band around 3275 cm-1, attributed to ν(N-H). The band observed around

151

1437 cm-1 correspond to δ(NH4+). Our results are in accordance with those reported in recent

152

results studies about the compounds of NH4 H2PO4 and KH2PO4 by using in situ ATR-IR

153

spectroscopy [33, 39, 40]. Similar assignments were also reported for NH4Ce(PO3)4 [24].

154

The strong band around 1252 cm-1 which is assigned to the asymmetric vibration νas(PO2)-

155

corresponds to the few lines in the Raman spectrum that appear in the 1400-1200cm-1 region.

156

The average bands observed at 1167 and 1084 cm-1 in the IR spectrum and the broad line at

157

1186 cm-1 in the Raman spectrum can be assigned to the symmetric vibration of νs(PO2)-.

158

Also, we attribute the two bands between 812 and 780 cm-1 in the IR spectra and the few lines

159

occurring at 1151 and 974 cm-1 in the Raman spectrum to the asymmetric vibration of νas(P-

160

O-P). Symmetric stretching vibrations νs(P-O-P) in chain polyphosphate occur by large bands

161

located in the 810-619 cm-1area in IR spectrum and intense lines at 744 cm-1 in the Raman

162

spectrum. It is worth pointing out that it is very difficult to distinguish between the symmetric

163

deformation (δs) and the asymmetric deformation (δas) bending modes of (PO2)- species and

164

δ(POP) bending, located in the low frequency region below 621 cm-1, Moreover, these modes

165

often overlay with external modes. A comparison of the IR bands and Raman lines of the

166

titled compound shows that the majority of them do not coincide, which is in agreement with

167

the centrosymmetry of the NH4Er(PO3)4 structure.

168

3.3. Luminescence properties

3.3.1. Absorption spectrum

169 170

Absorption spectrum of NH4Er(PO3)4 is presented in Fig. 6. This spectrum shows 10

171

bands peaked at 350, 387, 429, 470, 505, 527, 635, 777, 978 and 1515 nm corresponding to

172

the absorption transitions from the ground state 4I15/2 to the excited states 4G11/2, 4F3/2, 4F5/2,

173

4

F7/2, 2H11/2, 4S3/2, 4F9/2, 4I9/2, 4I11/2 and 4I13/2 respectively [41, 42]. In order to determine the

174

band gap energy, we used the Tauc plot method [43]: (αhν)2 = ( hν – Eg); where hν is the

175

photon energy (eV). The optical band gap was estimated by extrapolating the straight line

176

portion of the (αhν)2 versus photon energy E = hν plot until null absorption what leads to the

177

determination of the gap of 4.169 eV ( Fig. 7). 3.3.2 Emission spectrum

178 179

The emission spectrum is presented in Fig. 8(a). It shows the characteristic emission

180

lines resulting from the intra-configurational electronic from different excitations levels to

181

4

I15/2 fundamental level in the range of 350 to 700 nm under excitation at 325 nm (≈ 30769

182

cm-1). The origin of all emission lines observed in the spectrum (Fig. 8(b)) is indeed the result

183

of the re-absorption of the laser light by the erbium ions incorporated in the entitled matrix,

184

which is in accordance with the work of Eric Tanguy [44]. In order to identify different

185

groups of lines, we have referred to Hangjun Wu et al. [45]: two green emissions lines that

186

are located around 523 nm (≈ 19120 cm-1) corresponding to (2H11/2 → 4I15/2) transition and at

187

541nm (≈ 18480 cm-1) corresponding to (4S3/2 → 4I15/2) transition, one red emission line which

188

is situated around 652 nm (≈ 15334 cm-1) undoubtedly corresponding to (4F9/2 →4I15/2)

189

transition and all emissions lines of 4G9/2, 4G11/2, 2H9/2, 4F3/2, 4F5/2, 4F7/2 are situated

190

respectively at 364 nm (≈ 27470 cm-1), 378 nm (≈ 26455 cm-1), 404 nm (≈ 24752 cm-1), 442

191

nm (≈ 22624 cm-1), 449 nm (≈ 22270 cm-1) and 487 nm (≈ 20530 cm-1). The emission

192

spectrum upon 488nm wavelength excitation, registered between 1400 and 1700 nm is shown

193

in figure 8(b). It presents the characteristic emission band observed at 1535 nm (≈ 6666 cm-1)

194

[46], assigned to the security ocular and undoubtedly originating to (4I13/2 → 4I15/2) transition.

195

3.3.3 Excitation spectrum

196

The photoluminescence excitation spectrum of the Er

3+

in NH4Er(PO3)4 is shown in Figure

197

9. It was measured upon the emission wavelength λ = 657 nm. The broad excitation band that

198

appears at the beginning of the spectrum (more precisely in the UV range) is identified as due

199

to the charge transfer (CT) transitions of ligand O2- atoms and 4f–4f transitions within Er3+

200

4f11 electron configuration. In Reference, the O2- →RE3+ CTB (RE3+ = Rare earths trivalent

201

cation) were located in the range of 200–300 nm in most phosphates [47]. In fact, this is due

202

to the strong binding of the oxygen ligands in the polyphosphate compound. Our results show

203

a reasonable accordance with other compounds [48]; additionally it indicates that the

204

interactions between Er3+ ions and host lattice are strong. Along this band, it is also possible

205

to observe several narrow bands situated between 360 and 550 nm which are assigned to the

206

appropriate electronic transitions of Er(III) ion. The attributions to these bands are reported in

207

Table 7. This assignment was based on data from the literature concerning the Er3+ excitation

208

in phosphate host lattices. The intensities of all emission lines should gauge of the quality for

209

atoms occupation in the titled structure [46].

210

3.3.4 Decay curve (2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2)

211

Figure 10 shows the decay curves for three emission under UV-excitation wavelength

212

of NH4Er(PO3)4. The decays are shown to be exponential. The values of τ1 = 7.04µs and

τ2 =

213

5.26µs have been obtained for both green emissions located at 523 nm (19120cm-1) and at 541

214

nm (18484cm-1) assigned respectively to the 2H11/2 → 4I15/2 transition and to the 4S3/2 →4I15/2

215

transition. The red emission centered on 652 nm (≈ 15337 cm-1) assigned to the 4F9/2 →4I15/2

216

transition with τ3= 3.69µs; where: τ1, τ2 and τ3 are fluorescence lifetime components

217

contributing to the average lifetime. It is worth pointing that all impurities introduced,

218

structural defects, water molecule vibration modes (Jaba et al., 2010) [41] and OH groups [49]

219

may be invoked for explaining the very short fluorescence decay time of the 2 H11/2, 4S3/2 and

220 221

4

F9/2.

4. Conclusions

222

The structure of the NH4Er(PO3)4 polyphosphate has been determined by single crystal

223

X-ray diffraction. In this structure, erbium atoms are coordinated by eight oxygen atoms

224

forming ErO8 polyhedra isolated from each other. These polyhedra serve as links between

225

(PO3)n spiral chains of corner-sharing PO4 tetrahedra, that run along the [101] direction. The

226

infrared and Raman spectroscopy results are in agreement with the structure. Absorption and

227

PL measurements have been performed at RT. The decay curves for 2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2

228

levels under UV-excitation wavelength are characterized by a short radiative lifetime. Under

229

UV-excitation, a re-absorption phenomenon has been evoked as the main mechanism to

230

explain the appeared emission lines. NH4Er(PO3)4 showed an interesting emission at 1.53 µm

231

related to the 4I13/2→4I15/2 transition. The excitation spectrum shows that the position of the

232

charge transfer band (CTB) is located between 230 nm and 300 nm, in agreement with most

233

phosphates. From these results, it appears that study is an interesting material for optical

234

applications.

235

Acknowledgement

236

This work is supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in

237

Tunisia.

238

References

239

[1] G.A. Kumar, M. Pokhrel, A. Martinez, R.C. Dennis, I.L. Villegas, D.K. Sardar, J. Alloys

240

Compd. 513 (2012) 559–565.

241

[2] Y. El Sayed, J. Alloys Compd. 561 (2013) 234–240.

242

[3] H. Tran Minh , W. Rongfei , Y. Xue , Z. Dacheng , S. Zhiguo , Y. Zhengwen , H. Xijia

243

,Q Jianbei, J. Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 73 (2012) 1182–1186.

244

[4] K. Maheshvaran, S. Arunkumar, V. Sudarsan, V. Natarajan, K. Marimuthu, J. Alloys

245

Compd. 561 (2013) 142–150.

246

[5] J.A. Vallés, Opt. Mater. 35 (2013) 397–401.

247

[6] K. Ouannes, M.T. Soltani, M. Poulain, G. Boulon, G. Alombert-Goget, Y. Guyot, A.

248

Pillonnet, K. Lebbou, J. Alloys Compd. 603 (2014) 132–135.

249

[7] I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, S. Hraiech, M. Ferid, J. Luminescence. 132 (2012) 832–840.

250

[8] B. Julián-López, V. de la Luz, F. Gonell, E. Cordoncillo, M. López-Haro, J. J. Calvino, P.

251

Escribano, J. Alloys Compd. 519 (2012) 29–36.

252

[9] E. O. Serqueira, R. F. de Morais, N. O. Dantas, J. Alloys Compd. 560 (2013) 200–207.

253

[10] F. Rivera-López, P. Babu, L. Jyothi, U.R. Rodríguez-Mendoza, I.R. Martín, C.K.

254

Jayasankar, V. Lavín, Opt. Mater. 34 (2012) 1235–1240.

255

[11] K. Jaouadi, H. Naîli, N. Zouari, T. Mhiri, A. Daoud, J. Alloys Compd. 354 (2003)

256

104–114.

257

[12] M. El Masloumi, V. Jubera, S. Pechev, J.P. Chaminade, J. J. Videau, M. Mesnaoui,

258

M. Maazaz, B. Moine, J. Solid. State. Chem. 181 (2008) 3078–3085.

259

[13] J.-C. Liu & D.-Y. Li, Acta Phys. Sin. 32 (1983) 786–790.

260

[14] M. Férid, N. K. Ariguib, M. Trabelsi, J. Solid. State. Chem. 38 (1981) 129–133.

261

[15] M. Fang, W.D. Cheng, Z. Xie, H. Zhang, D. Zhao, W.L. Zhang, S-L. Yang, J.

262

Molecular Structure. 891 (2008) 25–29.

263

[16] M. Férid, B. Piriou, M. Trabelsi-Ayedi, J. Ther. Analysis. 53 (1998) 227–234.

264

[17] M. Férid, M. Dogguy, N. K. Ariguib, M. Trabelsi, J. Solid. State. Chem. 53 (1984)

265

149–154.

266

[18] H. Ettis, H. Naïli, T. Mhiri, J. Solid. State. Chem. 179 (2006) 3107–3113.

267

[19] E. Ben Zarkouna, A. Driss, Acta Crystallogr. E60 (2004) i102–i104.

268

[20] H. Y-P. Hong, Mater. Res. Bull. 10 (1975a) 635–640.

269

[21] M. Moutataouia, M. Lamire, M. Saadi and L. El Ammari. Acta Cryst. E70 (2014) i1.

270

[22] S. Ben Moussa, M. Férid, M. Trabelsi-Ayedi, Thermochimica Acta. 249 (1995) 189–

271

197.

272

[23] M. T. Averbuch-Pouchot, M. Bagieu-Beucher, Z. anorg. allg. Chem. 552 (1987)

273

171–180.

274

[24] M. Rzaigui, N. K. Ariguib, J. Solid. State. Chem. 49 (1983) 391–398.

275

[25] G M. Sheldrick, SHELXS 97, Program for Crystal Structure Determination,

276

University of Gôttingen, Germany (1997).

277

[26] G M. Sheldrick, SHELXL 97, Program for Crystal Structure Determination,

278

University of Gôttingen, Germany (1997).

279

[27] WinG X-version 1.63, L J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Cryst. 32 (1999) 837–838.

280

[28] K. Brandenburg, M. Berndt, DIAMOND, Crystal Impact Gb R, Bonn, Germany,

281

1999 (Version 2.1.b).

282

[29] S. N. Achary, D. Errandonea, A. Muñoz, P. Rodríguez-Hernández, F. J. Manjón, P. S. R.

283

Krishna, S. J. Patwe, V. Grover and A. K. Tyagi, Dalton Transactions. 42 (2013) 14999–

284

15015.

285

[30] E. Ben Zarkouna, A. Driss, M. Férid, Acta Crystallogr. C62 (2006) i64–i66.

286

[31] W.H. Baur, Acta Crystallogr. B30 (1974) 1195–1215.

287

[32] S. Ben Moussa, S. Ventemillas, A. Cabeza, E. Gutierrez-Puebla, J. Sanz, J. Solid. State.

288

Chem. 177 (2004) 2129–2137.

289

[33] C. Sun and D. Xue, J. Physical Chemistry C. 37 (2013) 19146–19153.

290

[34] X. Dongfeng and Z. Siyuan, J. Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 57 (1996) 1321–1328.

291

[35] D. Errandonea and F.J. Manjon, Progress in Materials Science. 53 (2008) 711–716.

292

[36] M. Bagieu-Beucher and J-C. Guitel, Z. anorg. allg. Chem. 559 (1988) 123–130.

293

[37] I D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Cryst, B. 41(1985) 244–247.

294

[38] M. Ferhi, K. Horchani-Naifer, M. Férid, Opt. Mater. 34 (2011) 12–18.

295

[39] C. Sun, D. Xu and D. Xue, CRYSTENGCOMM. 38 (2013) 7783–7791.

296

[40] C. Sun and D. Xue, CRYSTENGCOMM. 48 (2013) 10445–10450.

297

[41] N. Jaba, M. Ajroud, M. Férid, H. Maaref, Opt. Mater. 32 (2010) 479–483.

298

[42] K. Horchani, J. Amami, D. Merle, M. Férid, J. Phys. IV France. 122 (2004) 123–

299

128.

300

[43] J. Tauc, R. Grigoroyici, A. Vancu, Phys. Status Solidi. 15 (1966) 627–637.

301

[44] E. Tanguy, Thèse d’état, U.F.R Scientifique d'Orsay, Université de Paris Sud, 1996.

302

[45] H. Wu, Z. Yang, J. Liao, S. Lai, J. Qiu, Z. Song, Y. Yang, D. Zhou, Z. Yin, Optics

303

Express. 21 (2013) 22186–22193.

304

[46] X. Tiefeng, Z. Xudong, L. Guangpo, D. Shixun, N. Qiuhua, S. Xiang, Z. Xianghua,

305

Spectrochimica Acta Part. A 67 (2007) 559–563.

306

[47] Q. Shang, H. Yu, X. Kong, H. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang. Q. Zeng, J.

307

Luminescence. 128 (2008) 1211–1216.

308

[48] K. Li, P. Yang, L. Niu, and D. Xue. J. Physical Chemistry. 25 (2012) 6911–6916.

309

[49] B. Grobelna, A. Synak, P. Bojarski, Optica Applicata. 42 (2012) 337–344.

310

Captions figures and tables

311

Fig. 1. Projection along the [100] direction of the NH4Er(PO3)4 structure.

312

Fig. 2. A partial view of the structure along [101] direction, showing the spirals chains.

313

Fig. 3. The association mode of the PO4 tetrahedra within the chains.

314

Fig. 4. The IR spectrum of NH4Er(PO3)4.

315

Fig. 5. The Raman scattering spectrum of NH4Er(PO3)4.

316

Fig. 6. The absorption spectrum of Er3+ in NH4Er(PO3)4 ( λex = 325 nm).

317

Fig. 7. A Plot of (αhν)2 versus photon energy (hν) of NH4Er(PO3)4 ; α: absorption coefficient.

318

Fig. 8. The emission photoluminescence spectrum of Er3+ in NH4Er(PO3)4 at room

319

temperature. (a) in the UV-Vis range, (b) in the IR range.

320

Fig. 9. UV-excitation spectrum of Er3+ in NH4Er(PO3)4 (λem = 657nm).

321

Fig. 10. Decay time profiles of both green ( 2H11/2→4I15/2, λem = 523 nm and 4S3/2→4I15/2, λem

322

= 541 nm) and red (4F9/2→4I15/2, λem = 652 nm) emissions of NH4Er(PO3)4 crystal under

323

excitation wavelength λexc= 375 nm.

324

Table 1 Crystal data, recording conditions and refinement results for NH4Er(PO3)4.

325

Table 2 Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for

326

NH4Er(PO3)4.

327

Table 3 Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) in NH4Er(PO3)4.

328

Table 4 Distortion indices (ID) in the PO4 tetrahedra.

329

Table 5 Bond valence sums (BVS) for NH4Er(PO3)4 ∑exp and ∑th are the experimental and the

330

theoretical band valence sums(BVS).

331

Table 6 Raman and Infrared frequencies (cm-1) and their assignments.

332

Table 7 Excitation lines attribution of Er3+ in NH4Er(PO3)4.

333

Table 1 Crystal Data Diffractometer Empirical formula Formula weight (g. mol-1) Crystal system Space group Unit cell dimensions (Å)

Z Volume (Å3) ρcal(gcm-1)

CAD4 (Enraf-Nonius) NH4Er(PO3)4 501.18 Monoclinic P 21/n (no. 14) a = 10.259(3) b = 8.884(3) c = 10. 910(3) and 4 954.5(5) 3.49

β = 106.27(1)°

Data collection Crystal dimensions (mm3) Monochromator Scan type 2θmax (°) λ (Å) µ (mm-1) Limiting indices F (0 0 0) Number of measurement reflexions Number of unique reflexions; Rint Number of observed reflexions [I > 2σ (I)]

0.20 x 0.18 x 0.16 Graphite ω/2θ 33.06 0.71073 9.534 -15 ≤ h ≤ 15; 0 ≤ k ≤ 13; 940 3705 3550; Rint = 0.0126 3356

0 ≤ l ≤ 16

Structural refinement Absorption correction 2

Ψ scan

Goodness-of-fit on F 0.984 Theta range for data collection 3.01 – 33.06 Number of parameters 164 Extinction coefficient 0.0060 Weighting scheme w = 1/ (σ2 (I) + 0.1000 I2) Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2 R [F2 > 2σ (F2)], wR (F2), S R1 = 0.0308, wR2 = 0.0923, S = 0.9840 -3 ∆ρmax, ∆ρmin (e .Å ) 2.282, -2.272 2 2 2 2 2 1/2 wR2 = (∑[W(F0 – Fc ) ] / [W(F0 ) ]) , R1 = ∑[|F0|-|Fc|] / ∑|F0| where W = 1 / [σ2(F20 ) + (0.0524P)2 + 21.5635P] and P = ( F20 + 2 Fc2 ) /3.

Table 2 Atoms Wyckoff

x

y

z

Ueq(Å2)

Er

4e

0.00149(3)

0.22447(2)

0.18677(6)

0.0069(9)

P1

4e

0.95991(10)

-0.17451(11)

0.14202(10)

0.0018(4)

P2

4e

0.17694(10)

0.39878(12)

0.48113(10)

0.0018(5)

P3

4e

0.75023(10)

0.97190(11)

0.22847(10)

0.0014(3)

P4

4e

0.95992(10)

0.82549(11)

0.14204(10)

0.0014(3)

O1

4e

0.0644(3)

0.2369(4)

0.9876(3)

0.0061(5)

O2

4e

0.2418(3)

0.1786(4)

0.2548(3)

0.0075(3)

O3

4e

0.1005(3)

0.4619(4)

0.1769(3)

0.0064(3)

O4

4e

0.0709(3)

0.2954(4)

0.4129(3)

0.0065(2)

O5

4e

0.8261(3)

0.4032(4)

0.1910(3)

0.0055(5)

O6

4e

0.8539(3)

0.0824(4)

0.2904(3)

0.0046(9)

O7

4e

0.8173(3)

0.1514(4)

0.0177(3)

0.0073(1)

O8

4e

0.0417(3)

0.9606(4)

0.1806(3)

0.0066(1)

O9

4e

0.1668(4)

0.5511(4)

0.4051(3)

0.0074(6

O10

4e

0.6442(3)

0.0407(4)

0.1066(3)

0.0040(8)

O11

4e

0.0198(3)

0.7011(4)

0.2461(3)

0.0059(1)

O12

4e

0.8171(3)

0.8434(3)

0.1665(3)

0.0041(7)

N

4e

0.3010(5)

0.4284(6)

0.0417(5)

0.0177(1)

H1

4e

1.3879(3)

0.4209(9)

0.1306(1)

0.0448(9)*

H2

4e

1.2544(9)

0.4803(4)

0.0050(9)

0.0400(1)*

H3

4e

1.2468(4)

0.3897(1)

0.0350(7)

0.0246(8)*

H4

4e

1.3429(8)

0.3978(1)

0.0077(8)

0.0159(4)*

Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor; Ueq = 1/3∑i ∑j Uij ai* aj*aiaj *, isotropic displacement parameters

Table 3 ErO8 Er1 — O8 Er1 — O6 Er1 — O1 Er1 — O5 Er1 — O12 Er1 — O2 Er1 — O9 Er1 — O11

2.333(15) 2.357(4) 2.384(4) 2.402(8) 2.410(3) 2.437(7) 2.450(8) 2.475(8) 2.406(5)

O8 — Er1 — O6 O8 — Er1 — O1 O6 — Er1 — O1 O8 — Er1 — O5 O6 — Er1 — O5 O1 — Er1 — O5 O8 — Er1 — O12 O6 — Er1 — O12 O1 — Er1 — O12 O5 — Er1 — O12 O8 — Er1 — O2 O6 — Er1 — O2 O1 — Er1 — O2 O5 — Er1 — O2 O12 — Er1 — O2 O8 — Er1 — O9 O6 — Er1 — O9 O1 — Er1 — O9 O5 — Er1 — O9 O12 — Er1 — O9 O2 — Er1 — O9

118.47(12) 79.18(12) 142.98(12) 136.96(12) 75.39(11) 70.81(12) 75.81(11) 75.22(12) 141.66(12) 144.40(11) 70.44(11) 72.15(12) 85.88(11) 77.16(13) 111.90(12) 144.13(11) 78.98(11) 106.09(11) 75.46(12) 79.60(11) 144.23(11)

P(1)O4 P1 — O1 P1 — O2 P1 — O3 P1 — O4

1.457(4) 1.474(4) 1.569(4) 1.580(5) 1.520(1)

O1 — P1 — O2 O1 — P1 — O3 O2 — P1 — O3 O1 — P1 — O4 O2 — P1 — O4 O3 — P1 — O4

121.11(11) 110.60(9) 106.75(9) 107.06(14) 110.68(9) 98.27(9)

P(2)O4 P2 — O8 P2 — O9 P2 — O7 P2 — O10

1.452(5) 1.459(6) 1.575(4) 1.592(5) 1.520(1)

O8 — P2 — O9 O8 — P2 — O7 O9 — P2 — O7 O8 — P2 — O10 O9 — P2 — O10 O7 — P2 — O10

119.12(19) 108.79(20) 110.04(20) 107.46(19) 110.16(19) 99.44(18)

P(3)O4 P3 — O12 P3 — O11 P3 — O3 P3 — O10

1.464(6) 1.465(6) 1.578(5) 1.586(9) 1.524(2)

O12 — P3 — O11 O12 — P3 — O3 O11 — P3 — O3 O12 — P3 — O10 O11 — P3 — O10 O3 — P3 — O10

116.32(20) 108.99(18) 109.64(19) 107.89(18) 111.52(18) 101.42(18)

P(4)O4 P4 — O5 P4 — O6 P4 — O4 P4 — O7

1.448(4) 1.461(4) 1.566(4) 1.583(4) 1.515(2)

O5 — P4 — O6 O5 — P4 — O4 O6 — P4 — O4 O5 — P4 — O7 O6 — P4 — O7 O4 — P4 — O7

109.16(19) 109.94(12) 109.6(2) 109.39(22) 111.56(18) 97.38(19)

Table 4 Tetrahedron

P–Om

O–Om

O–P–Om

DI(P–O)

DI(O–O)

DI(O–P–O)

P1O4

1.520(1)

2.470

109.08

0.0358

0.0198

0.0463

P2O4

1.520(1)

2.472

109.23

0.0421

0.0112

0.0360

P3O4

1.524(2)

2.482

109.29

0.0385

0.0100

0.0306

P4O4

1.515(2)

2.463

107.84

0.0396

0.0185

0.0323

Table 5 exp

th

1.451

1.804

2

1.390

1.701

2

2.225

2

1.133

2.229

2

Atoms

Er

P1

O1

0.353

O2

0.311

O3

1.124

O4

1.096

P2

P3

P4

1.101

O5

0.338

1.485

1.823

2

O6

0.378

1.439

1.817

2

1.089

2.197

2

O7

1.108

O8

0.400

1.469

1.869

2

O9

0.301

1.446

1.747

2

1.082

2.149

2

O10

1.067

O11

0.283

1.426

1.709

2

O12

0.332

1.430

1.762

2

exp th

2.776 3

5.061 5

5.090 5

5.039 5

5.149 5

Table 6 IR frequencies (cm-1) 3273 3047

Intensity

1437 1412 1425

m vw vw

1297 1252

Raman frequencies (cm-1)

Intensity

Assignment

vs s δ (NH4+) 1313

s

1243

m

1229

vs

1180 1162 1143

vs vw m

s νas

-

νs

-

vs

1167 1148 1129 1117 1095 1084

sh m vw sh vw s

1064 1029 987 934 878

sh s m sh m

791 741 726 716

s vw m s

617 559 537 519 471

m vs s vw m

443 422 409

m sh m

1121 1104

sh vw

1063 1055 1036 971 864

m vw sh vw vw

736 725 716 713 703

vs s sh vw vw

556 520 483 467

w s m w w

418 404 389 340 313

m vw m m s

νas

νs

δ (PO)2

+ ν (M – O)

Table 7 Bands

Wavelength(nm)

Attribution

NH4Er(PO3)4 4

I15/2 → 2G9/2

a

367

b

394

4

I15/2 → 4F3/2

c

415

4

I15/2 → 4F5/2

d

444

4

I15/2 → 4F7/2

e

459

4

f

504

4

I15/2 → 4S3/2

g

533

4

I15/2 → 4F9/2

I15/2 → 2H11/2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8 (a)

(b)

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

388 389

390 391 392

Fig. 6

460 461

Highlights :

462



A structural study of NH4Er(PO3)4 is reported.

463



IR and Raman spectroscopy results are discussed.

464



A photoluminescence properties of NH4Er(PO3)4 are developed.

465

466 467

468 469 470 471 472

Figure 1: Projection along the [100] direction of the NH4Er(PO3)4 structure.