1 mbar). For quantitative kinetic studies - not dealt with in this short communication calibration of the omegatron is required, taking into account, e.g.: transition from
D. Barkowski et al. /Oscillations 235 I
VI +: s
Fig. 2. Onset
of oscillations
in platinum catalyzed CO oxidation 240 I
with increasing
245,,260 I
temperature;
L331
T / Y
2.5’C/min, p(tota1) = 16 mbar, 1.3%
co. viscous to molecular flow along the leak, influence of the temperature on gas density, calibration of ionization gauges. The capability of the versatile catalytic flow reactor and mass probe device is exemplified by results obtained in a study on oscillating instabilities in the platinum catalyzed CO oxidation. Typical results of non-stationary flow experiments with a polycrystalline platinum foil (0.05mm thickness, 0.9cm2 area, distance from leak
Fig. 3. Oscillations
at increasing
oxygen
pressure;
0.5 mbar 02/s,
p(C0)
= 0.2 mbar,
26O’C.
Fig, 4. Intluence of oxygen (a) 01 carbon monoxide (b) preadsorption oscillations: 26O’C.
on the evolution of
escalations suddenly appear at a critical gas composition of 1.3% CO with decreasing amplitude and increasing frequency. Particularly instructive are experiments in which the platinum surface is previously exposed to either 02 or CO with sudden addition of the other reactant, When oxygen is preadsorbed the oscillations set in practically irlstantaneously at full ampfitude and constant frequency (fig. 4a). The small time lag is mainly caused by gas mixing. Contrar~y, in the case of CO preadsorption a conside~ble delay is observed and the osculations develop only gradually (fig. 4b). While so far oscillations in the catalytic CO/O2 reaction have only been observed near atmospheric pressure, alike instabihties were found here in the range of a few mbar. Recently, Adlhoch, Lintz and Weisker [lo] reported the occurrence of osculations even at pressures below 7 X lo4 mbar for the oxidation of CO with NO on platinum. The present findings in transient flow experiments are in agreement with results obtained in comprehensive studies, particularly by Wicke et al. [ 1 I]. These authors give an interpretation based on kinetic argurnents for the cyclic surface reaction which proceeds almost iso~ermal~y. Two different sites are assumed, both of which can adsorb CO with different energies, while only one is able to competitively adsorb oxygen atoms. Reaction OGGWS between species adsorbed on adjacent sites (~ngmuir-~~inshelwood ~~echanism~. The oscillations in the rate of CO2 pruduction are caused by alternations between the forn~at~on of CO clusters subsequent to a high reactivity state, and stimulated CO desorption subsequent to a low reactivity state. While the CO adsorption on a preadsorbed oxygen layer is readily possible (WITIpression of the surface layer, surface mobility of CO [12]), oxygen adsorption in the reverse case requires prior CO desorption {fig. 4).
D. Barkowski et al. / ~s~ill~~ions in platinum catalyzed CO oxidation
I.333
The nature and distribution of the different adsorption sites is as yet not clear. In principle, two concepts may be considered: (i) the bonding configuration of the adsorbate depends on the crystallographic structure and topography of the substrate surface; (ii) different bonding configurations on a uniform surface may be due to mutual interactions between adjacent adsorbed species of the same or different kind; correspondingly the surface coverage is a determining factor. For instance, in CO adsorption on platinum it is known [12] that the adsorption energy as well as the structure of the overlayer changes abruptly at certain coverages. Further information on the oscillation mechanism could be obtained from studies on single crystal faces in a wide pressure range, in connection with results obtained particularly from TDS, work function change, and photoelectron spectroscopy. We wish to thank Prof. Dr. H. Gentsch, Universitst Essen, for his readiness to leave the omegatron set up at our disposal and for helpful suggestions. Financial support by “Fonds der Chemischen Industrie” and “Max Buchner Forschungsstiftung” are gratefully acknowledged.
References [I] H.D. Polaschegg, A. Jungel and E. Schirk, Vakuum-Tech. 28 (1979) 227. [ 21 M. Seidl, E. SteinheiI and W. Scherber, Deut. Pat. Off. 2620941 (1977). [3] D. KitzeImann, W. Vieistich and T. Dittrich, Chem. Ing.-Tech. 49 (1977) 463. [4] D.W. Blakely, E.I. Kozak, B.A. Sexton and G.A. Smorjai, J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. 13 (1976) 1091. [5 ] H. Hammarquist, B. Kasemo, K.E. Keck and T. Hogberg, Ned. Tijdschr. Vacuumtech. 16 (1978) 67 (presented at ECOSS I, Amsterdam, 1978). [6] H. Gentsch, W. Grossmann, N. GuiIlen, M. Kijpp and H. Rinne, Vakuum-Tech. 23 (1974) 230. [7] F.P. Lossing and A.W. Tickner, J. Chem. Phys. 20 (1952) 907. [8] B. Kasemo, Rev. Sci. Instr. 50 (1979) 1602. [9] E.g., LeyboldHeraeus, K&t, IM-Type 110. [lo] W. AdIhoch, H.G. Lintz and T. Weisker, presented at: Kinetics of Physicochemical OsciIIations, Discussion Meeting by Deutsche Bunsenges. Physik. Chem., Aachen 1979. Abstract in: Ber. Bunsenges. Physik. Chem. 84 (1980) 410. [ 1I] E. Wicke, P. Kummann, W. Keil and J. Schiefler. Ber, Bunsenges. Physik. Chem. 84 (1980) 315; W. KeiI and E. Wicke, Ber. Bunsenges. Physik. Chem. 84 (1980) 315. 1121 T. Engel and G. Erti, Advan. Catalysis 28 (1979) 1.