Study of light-induced creation of defects in a-Si:H by means of single and dual-beam photoconductivity

Study of light-induced creation of defects in a-Si:H by means of single and dual-beam photoconductivity

Journal of Non-CrystallineSolids 59 & 60 (1983) 397400 North-Holland Publishing Company 397 STUDY OF LIGHT-INDUCED CREATION OF DEFECTS IN a-Si:H BY ...

158KB Sizes 0 Downloads 15 Views

Journal of Non-CrystallineSolids 59 & 60 (1983) 397400 North-Holland Publishing Company

397

STUDY OF LIGHT-INDUCED CREATION OF DEFECTS IN a-Si:H BY MEANS OF SINGLE AND DUAL-BEAM PHOTOCONDUCTIVITY Daxing HANf and H. FRITZSCHE James Franck I n s t i t u t e , The University of Chicago, Chicago, I l l i n o i s

60637

The d i f f e r e n t response of photoconductive properties of a-Si:H to l i g h t exposure and annealing suggests that two kinds of metastable states can be produced. One kind decreases the m o b i l i t y - l i f e t i m e product ~ , the other increases the subbandgap absorption. I.

INTRODUCTION Infrared (IR) and thermal quenching of the photoconductivity ~p is believed

to be caused by IR or thermal e x c i t a t i o n of holes from class I I centers having small electron recombination rates via the valence band to class I centers having large electron recombination rates. 1

The s i m i l a r i t y of the spectral depend-

ence of IR quenching and of photo-induced IR absorption suggests that class I I centers are hole traps.

An additional center has been postulated to explain IR

enhancement above 30OK.

We report here single and dual beam Op measurements2

on an undoped a-Si:H sample a f t e r annealing and l i g h t exposure.

The l a t t e r

(Staebler-Wronski e f f e c t ) 4 is believed to produce metastable dangling bond defects via recombination. 2. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The 0.8 Im thick a-Si:H sample was glow-discharge deposited at 500K onto a Corning 7059 substrate which carried predeposited NiCr contacts 0.4 cm long and 0.05 cm apart.

The dark c o n d u c t i v i t y ~d of the annealed state A was activated

with Ea = 0.83 eV and a prefactor oo = 2 X 104 (ohm-cm)- I .

Fig. 1 shows the T-

dependences of od and op (with ~d subtracted) a f t e r four treatments:

A = an-

nealed at 430K f o r l h , A* = annealed at 480K f o r lh, B1 = exposed to AM1 for 3h at 30OK, and B2 = exposed to AM1 for 3h at 16OK. reproducible.

All states are reversible and

We were unable to reach state A* by annealing state A for l l h .

One observes the f a m i l i a r decrease of ~r due to photocreation of metastable recombination centers yet the T-dependences of the four states are noticeably different. fDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, Academia Sinica, B e i j i n g , China. Support provided by The National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR8009225. 0022-3093/83/0000-0000/$03.00 © 1983 North-Holland/Physical Society of Japan

D. Han, H. Fritzsche /Study oflight-induced creation o f defects

398

-8

r

I

I

[

300 K

A

ffp ot h~:2eV

~iI\ E E v

-9

o

-

-

j

E

-i0

~-E

o

-

-g -25

-II I

~

[

4

L

I

~

103/T

I

6

5

7

I/Ual .o 48OK onoeol -aTUl//-r°

( K-~)

~/[

FIGURE 1 Temperature dependence of dark and p h o t o c o n d u c t i v i t y of annealed (A,A*) and exposed (BI,B2) a-Si:H

A x 430K onneol

I

Bf ~ 300K exposure 1.0

2.0 3.0 I.O photon energy hl/ (eV)

2.0

FIGURE 2 Spectral dependence of normalized photoconductivity The spectral dependences of the normalized ~p/F at 300K are shown on the l e f t of Fig. 2.

The incident photon f l u x F was changed such that Op and thus

the trap-quasi-Fermi level Etn remained constant over the spectral range.

On

the right the differences in ~T were eliminated by making a l l curves agree with A* at hv = 2 eV.

We interpret the shoulder below hv = 1.4 eV as subbandgap de-

fect-induced absorption ~ in agreement with Amer et a l . 5 although no independent m measurements were made.

An important r e s u l t of our studies is the f o l l o w -

ing. Although low T exposure (B2) reduces Hz as e f f i c i e n t l y

as 300K exposure

(BI) the subbandgap absorption increases much more by exposure at 300K than at 16OK. The dashed curve of Fig. 3 shows the decrease of hT as a f u n c t i o n of the increase in ~ at hv : 1 eV a f t e r i n c r e a s i n g l y longer l i g h t exposures.

We as-

sumed m to be p r o p o r t i o n a l to Op at 1 eV. 7 The increase in m occurs at longer exposures at 300K a f t e r the decrease in ~ e s s e n t i a l l y s a t u r a t e d . posure (B2) only the ~ decrease is observed.

s t a t e at 300K causes an increase in m towards Bl at constant ~ . in Fig. 3 shows the r e s u l t of stepwise annealing from B1 to A*. retrace of the dashed curve one finds t h a t ~

For 160K ex-

A d d i t i o n a l exposure of the B2 The f u l l

curve

Instead of a

recovers more r a p i d l y than m.

This suggests t h a t the photo-induced centers which reduce p~ are not the ones which cause an increase in m , or more p r e c i s e l y , in the r e l a t i v e magnitude of

399

D. Han, H. Fritzsche / Study o f light-induced creation of defects Op/F below 1.4 eV a f t e r normalizing f o r differences in !~ at 2 eV.

IR quenching, which is observed below about 20OK, depends also on the states of anneal and exposure as shown in Fig. 4.

The f i n a l annealing between A and

A* increases quenching s i g n i f i c a n t l y whereas l i g h t exposure diminishes i t w i t h out changing the threshold near 0.42 eV. agree with those of Vanier et a l . 3 t i o n spectra. 6

The shapes of the quenching spectra

and are s i m i l a r to the photoinduced absorp-

Our r e s u l t s suggest t h a t l i g h t exposure diminishes the f r a c t i o n

of class I I center recombination by creating e i t h e r class I or a t h i r d kind of recombination centers. Above approximately 200K one observes 3

IR enhancement which means the dual beam

- -

,

i

~p is l a r g e r than the sum of the two s i n gle beam Op'S.

One cause f o r t h i s e f -

f e c t are the increased number of IR exE i_J

c i t a t i o n s i n t o the conduction band due to the r i s e of Etn in the presence of pump l i g h t .

The results shown in Fig.

5 are measured at 300K f o r the same Opump = 1.2 X 10-7 ohm-I cm-I and nearly the same Etn.

The four states of anneal

and exposure a f f e c t the magnitudes of enhancement and quenching in the oppos i t e manner.

Moreover, the B1 spectrum

shows a pronounced f l a t

region s i m i l a r

I0 v

=L /

o

)

'

~-o • e-

B1 / o

B2@ 2 4 6 8 leV Absorption e (orb. units)

to the B1 s i n g l e beam spectrum of Fig. 2.

There is a very small change in en-

hancement between states A and B2 despite the large change in ~T (see Fig. 3). This suggests t h a t the enhancement

FIGURE 3 Change of o D at h~ = 2 eV (~T) versus absorption at 1 eV as a function of exposure (dashed) and annealing ( s o l i d curve)

process is associated with the cause f o r increased absorption below 1.4 eV and not with the photoinduced recombination centers which decrease ~ . 3. CONCLUSIONS The e f f e c t s of l i g h t exposure at 160K and 300K and of stepwise annealing on single and dual beam Op spectra i n d i c a t e t h a t the metastable centers produced are of two kinds.

One a f f e c t s p r i m a r i l y the p h o t o c a r r i e r l i f e t i m e (~T), the

o t h e r produces an increase in op below 1.4 eV r e l a t i v e to Op at 2 eV (an increase in subbandgap a b s o r p t i o n ) .

This second kind disappears at higher anneal

temperatures than the f i r s t

The photocreated defects are not the sensi-

kind.

t i z i n g states (class I I ) which y i e l d low T quenching but instead they provide a

D. Han, H. Fritzsche / Study o f light4nduced creation o f defects

400

competing recombination channel. o #

300 K

/

O'pomp:L2x~O-7(ohm-cm)-I E

E

'E

TE - I

A'

~o I]OK 8 -I ~Oump:4.7xlO {ohm-crn)

-2

0.4

0:6

o:8

,.%

,.z

,.4

photon energy h~ (eV)

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

photon energy hZZ {eV)

FIGURE 4 Normalized infrared quenching at 130K

FIGURE 5 Normalized infrared enhancement at 300K

REFERENCES I) A. Rose, Concepts in Photoconductivity and A l l i e d Problems ( R. E. Krieger, Huntington, N.Y. 1978). 2) P. D. Persans and H. Fritzsche, J. de Physique 42 (1981) C4 - 597; P. D. Persans, Phil. Mag. 46 (1982) 435. 3) P. E. Vanier and R. W. G r i f f i t h ,

J. Appl. Phys. 53 (]982) 4.

4) D. L. Staebler and C. R. Wronski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31 (1977) 292. 5) W. B. Jackson and N. M. Amer, Phys. Rev. B 15 (1982) 5559. 6) P. O'Connor and J. Tauc, Solid State Commun. 36 (1980) 947. 7) We assumed ~ to be proportional to ap at hv = 1 eV a f t e r normalizing ~p for the differences in ~T at 2 eV as shown on the r i g h t hand side of figure 2.

1.4