Accepted Manuscript Suitability of chlorine dioxide as a tertiary treatment for municipal wastewater and use of reclaimed water for overhead irrigation of baby lettuce Luana Tombini Decol, Francisco López-Gálvez, Pilar Truchado, Eduardo César Tondo, Maria I. Gil, Ana Allende PII:
S0956-7135(18)30445-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.036
Reference:
JFCO 6300
To appear in:
Food Control
Received Date: 1 March 2018 Revised Date:
11 July 2018
Accepted Date: 29 August 2018
Please cite this article as: Luana Tombini Decol, Francisco López-Gálvez, Pilar Truchado, Eduardo César Tondo, Maria I. Gil, Ana Allende, Suitability of chlorine dioxide as a tertiary treatment for municipal wastewater and use of reclaimed water for overhead irrigation of baby lettuce, Food Control (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.036 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Running Title: ClO2 disinfection of wastewater to be used as agricultural water.
2 3 Suitability of chlorine dioxide as a tertiary treatment for municipal wastewater
5
and use of reclaimed water for overhead irrigation of baby lettuce
6
RI PT
4
Luana Tombini Decol1; Francisco López-Gálvez2; Pilar Truchado2; Eduardo César
8
Tondo1; Maria I. Gil2, Ana Allende2*
SC
7
9 10
1
11
Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (ICTA/UFRGS).
12
Av. Bento Gonçalves 9.500, prédio 43212, Campos do Vale, Agronomia, CEP: 91501-
13
970, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.
14
2
15
Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo,
16
30100, Murcia, Spain.
M AN U
TE D
Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of
AC C
EP
17
Laboratório de Microbiologia e Controle de Alimentos, Instituto de Ciência e
*
Corresponding author: Ana Allende – E-mail:
[email protected]
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT
19
Reclaimed wastewater used for agricultural irrigation should meet specific
20
microbiological standards in order to prevent microbial contamination of the irrigated
21
produce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of chlorine dioxide
22
(ClO2) for the disinfection of secondary-treated municipal wastewater and its
23
subsequent use for overhead irrigation in greenhouse production of baby lettuce. The
24
impact of reclaimed water tertiary-treated with ClO2 on E. coli concentration, the
25
presence of pathogenic bacteria, and the occurrence of chlorates as disinfection by-
26
products was evaluated in water and in baby lettuce. E. coli was quantified using both
27
conventional plating methods and a quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) method with
28
propidium monoazide (PMA) pre-treatment to differentiate between viable and non-
29
viable bacteria. Population density of cultivable E. coli was significantly lower (p
30
<0.05) in reclaimed water, tertiary-treated using ClO2 (ClO2W), when compared with
31
secondary-treated municipal wastewater (SW). However, no significant differences in
32
viable but non-cultivable (VBNC) E. coli loads were observed between treatments when
33
quantifying using the PMA-qPCR method. These results could indicate that ClO2
34
treatment of wastewater water did not kill the bacteria present in the water but it
35
induced bacteria to enter a VBNC state. The proportion of samples positive for the
36
presence of pathogenic bacteria was lower in ClO2W (1/8) compared with SW (7/8).
37
Significantly lower E. coli counts (p <0.05) were detected in plants irrigated with
38
ClO2W compared with those irrigated with SW. Relationship between higher E. coli
39
counts and the presence of pathogens was observed when lettuce samples were analysed
40
by PMA-qPCR (Mann-Whitney U Test, p<0.05). Baby lettuce irrigated with ClO2W
41
showed a significantly higher concentration of chlorates than lettuce irrigated with SW.
42
The quantification of viable bacteria using molecular methods suggests that the efficacy
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
18
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of ClO2 could be overestimated when conventional plating quantification methods are
44
used. Additionally, the accumulation of chlorates in the tissue should be considered as it
45
represents an adverse effect of this disinfection treatment.
46
Keywords: Fresh produce; fruits and vegetables; agricultural water; water
47
disinfection; foodborne pathogens; disinfection by-products; chemical risk.
RI PT
43
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
48
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 49
1.
Introduction Water reclamation and reuse for irrigation in agriculture are priority innovation
51
practices. Water reuse is indicated by the European Commission (EC) as an important
52
topic for the circular sustainable economy, a regenerative system in which resource
53
input and waste, emission, and energy leakage are minimized. Currently, reclaimed
54
water is mostly used in agricultural irrigation, especially in semi-arid and arid regions to
55
overcome water scarcity (Becerra-Castro et al., 2015). Limited awareness of potential
56
benefits among targeted end-users, and lack of a supportive and coherent framework for
57
water reuse are major reasons for reducing this practice in the EU (EC, 2017a).
58
Wastewater usually contains pathogenic microorganisms, many of which are able to
59
survive in the environment and be transmitted to humans through fresh produce (EPA,
60
2004; Steele & Odumeru, 2004; Uyttendaele et al., 2015; López-Gálvez et al., 2016a).
61
Although reclamation treatments can improve the microbiological quality of water, the
62
effluents of wastewater treatment plants can be vehicle of microbiological and chemical
63
hazards that can affect the safety of irrigated vegetables (Pérez-Sautu et al., 2012). In
64
fact, the microbiological safety of irrigation water is one of the most important factors
65
to be considered in the production of leafy greens (Allende & Monaghan, 2015;
66
Uyttendaele et al., 2015; Decol et al., 2017).
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
Chemical disinfection treatments are often used as tertiary treatments for the
AC C
67
RI PT
50
68
reclamation of municipal wastewater. Among the chemical disinfectants, chlorine is one
69
of the most commonly used biocides for wastewater disinfection and irrigation water
70
treatment. However, chlorine is highly reactive with organic matter and causes the
71
generation of organo-halogenated disinfection by-products (e.g. trihalomethanes and
72
haloacetic acids) (Ayyildiz, et al., 2009; Nikolaou & Lekkas, 2001; Rodriguez &
73
Serodes, 2001). Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) has been defined as a potential alternative to
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT chlorine for disinfection of agricultural water. The main advantage of ClO2 over
75
chlorine is the formation of fewer types and lesser amounts of organo-halogenated by-
76
products (Veschetti et al., 2003; López-Gálvez et al., 2010; Van Haute et al., 2015; Van
77
Haute et al., 2017). However, the use of ClO2 can lead to the presence of other DBPs
78
such as chlorites (ClO2-) and chlorates (ClO3-) in the treated water via
79
disproportionation reactions (AHDB, 2016). ClO2 shows a higher oxidation capacity
80
and bactericidal capability compared to chlorine (Hassenberg et al., 2017). Bactericidal
81
effectiveness of ClO2 depends on several factors, including disinfectant dose, contact
82
time, water temperature, pH, and organic load (Junli et al., 1997; Ayyildiz, et al., 2009).
83
Sprinkler irrigation is the most utilized irrigation system for the commercial
84
growth of baby leaves (Oron, 2002; Pachepsky et al., 2011). Current Spanish and US
85
legislation classify reclaimed water based on specific microbiological standards in
86
different categories, each one for specific crops and irrigation system (Real Decreto
87
1620/2007, 2007). For example, only reclaimed water with less than 2 log CFU E. coli
88
/100 mL can be applied in direct contact with the edible part of the crop using overhead
89
irrigation.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
74
Based on these factors, the aim of present study was to evaluate the suitability of
117
ClO2 for the reduction of the microbiological contamination present in secondary-
118
treated wastewater used for overhead irrigation of commercially grown baby lettuce.
119
The effect of ClO2 on the concentration of the fecal indicator E. coli, and on the
120
presence of the bacterial pathogens Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) and
121
Salmonella spp. were assessed. These pathogenic microorganisms were selected as the
122
most relevant foodborne pathogens on leafy greens (Ahmed et al., 2012; Ferguson et al.,
123
2012; EFSA and ECDC, 2015; Decol et al., 2017). Additionally, the potential
124
occurrence of chlorates in water and in the irrigated plants was evaluated.
AC C
EP
116
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 125 126
2.
Materials and methods
127
2.1. Experimental setup Ten day-old Red oak lettuce plants obtained from a local nursery (Semilleros
129
Jimenado S.A., Torre Pacheco, Spain) were grown in a greenhouse located next to the
130
wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) (Murcia, Spain) (37°47′48″ N, 0°57′33″ W). Data
131
acquisition including climatological data and the irrigation system’s layout have been
132
described in previous studies (López-Gálvez et al., 2014). In the present study, two
133
types of water were used for overhead irrigation system. The first water type was
134
secondary effluent from the WWTP (SW) obtained by the treatment of municipal
135
wastewater. Secondary treatment consisted in activated sludge systems followed by
136
coagulation-flocculation for the removal of suspended solids, colloids and organic
137
matter present in wastewater (Renault et al., 2009; López-Gálvez et al., 2016b). The
138
second irrigation water type consisted of secondary effluent from the WWTP treated
139
with chlorine dioxide (ClO2W). The plants were grown on trays with peat as substrate.
140
A total of eight lettuce trays with 294 plants each were used for each irrigation water
141
type.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
128
Two preliminary tests were carried out in order to adjust the ClO2 doses and the
143
experimental conditions for lettuce growth. For the selection of the optimum
144
disinfectant doses, the reduction of E. coli in the water and the phytotoxic effects in the
145
plants were taken into account. During November and December 2016, a final
146
experiment that lasted 21 days was performed using the optimum conditions previously
147
established. In the final experiment, minimum and maximum temperatures inside the
148
greenhouse were 14.4 °C and 28.3 °C, respectively, with an average of 17.2 °C. The
149
relative humidity (RH) in the greenhouse ranged from 52.6 % to 91.6 % with an average
AC C
142
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 150
of 76.8 %. The day length during this period was approximately 10 hours. The
151
approximate total amount of irrigation water applied throughout the experiment was 1.6
152
m3 per treatment. During the growing cycle, the lettuce plants were irrigated once a day
153
for 5-15 minutes. During the experiments, the concentration of culturable and presumptive viable E.
155
coli, as well as the presence of pathogenic bacteria were assessed in water and lettuce
156
samples. Additionally, residual ClO2 concentration and other physicochemical
157
parameters of the irrigation water such as pH, temperature, oxidation reduction potential
158
(ORP), absorbance at 254 nm (UV254), and the concentration of chlorates (ClO3-) were
159
analyzed.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
154
160 161
2.2. Preparation, measurement, and application of chlorine dioxide The company Servicios Técnicos de Canarias (STC S.L.U., Las Palmas de Gran
163
Canaria, Spain) provided reagents and instructions for the preparation of the stable
164
chlorine dioxide solution AGRI DIS® (ClO2). A concentrated ClO2 solution (7000
165
mg/L) was prepared weekly and kept in an opaque plastic jerry can at ambient
166
temperature. Chronoamperometric measurement of ClO2 concentration was performed
167
using the equipment ChlordioXense® (Palintest, Gateshead, United Kingdom). A
168
diluted ClO2 solution (100- 300 mg/L ClO2) was prepared daily just before starting the
169
irrigation using the concentrated ClO2 solution and tap water. The diluted ClO2 solution
170
was pumped directly to the pipes using a peristaltic pump. Pipe length and contact time
171
from the ClO2 application point to the sprinklers were ≈50 m and ≈6 min, respectively.
172
The ClO2 doses applied were selected based on the results of the preliminary trials.
AC C
EP
TE D
162
173 174
2.3. Sample collection
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Water sampling was performed every 2 to 5 days over the lettuce growing cycle.
176
Irrigation water was sampled during the irrigation of lettuce from the sprinkler emitters
177
located at the end of the irrigation lines. Each sampling day, three to five 2-L water
178
samples were collected using sterile plastic jars. For microbiological analysis, in order
179
to quench residual ClO2, 5 mL of sodium thiosulfate (17.5 g/L) were added to the
180
ClO2W samples. A total of n=74 water samples (38 SW, and 36 ClO2W samples) were
181
collected in eight different sampling days along the lettuce growing cycle. For
182
pathogenic bacteria analysis, one 10-L sample per treatment was collected each
183
sampling day (n=16). Additionally, for the measurement of chlorates, three samples (45
184
mL) per treatment (n=74) were taken each sampling day.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
175
Lettuce sampling was performed 5 times during the last two weeks of the lettuce
186
growing cycle. Samples were taken every 2 to 5 days, and the last sampling was done at
187
the end of the cycle. Each sampling day, three samples (60 g each) per treatment were
188
aseptically taken and were transported to the lab in refrigerated conditions. A total of
189
n=30 lettuce samples were collected (15 samples per treatment) in five different
190
sampling days. Lettuce samples were always taken before irrigation.
193
EP
192
2.4. E. coli analysis
Culturable E. coli quantification was carried out on water and lettuce samples. For
AC C
191
TE D
185
194
water samples, depending on the expected E. coli concentration, pour plating (1 mL)
195
and/or membrane filtration (10 and 100 mL) were used. Samples were filtered through
196
0.45 µm membrane filters (Sartorius, Madrid, Spain) using a filter holder manifold
197
(Millipore, Madrid, Spain). Chromocult coliform agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
198
was used for membrane incubation and pour plating. Plates were incubated for 24 h at
199
37 °C before interpretation of the results. Dark blue-violet colonies were considered
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT positives for E. coli. For lettuce samples, 25 g were homogenized in 100 mL of sterile
201
0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) for the quantification
202
of culturable E. coli. The homogenate was serially diluted and 1 mL aliquots were pour
203
plated using Chromocult coliform agar. Incubation of the plates and interpretation of
204
results were performed as explained before for water samples.
RI PT
200
Molecular quantification of E. coli in irrigation water and baby lettuce was
206
performed following the combined use of propidium monoazide (PMA, Biotium Inc,
207
Hayward, CA, USA) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) (PMA-qPCR)
208
as previously described in Truchado et al. (2016) with some modifications. Three water
209
samples (200 mL) per treatment (SW and ClO2W) and sampling day were centrifuged at
210
3000 g for 20 min. In the case of lettuce samples, three samples (25 g each) were
211
homogenized in 100 mL of sterile 0.1% BPW using a Stomacher at low speed for 1
212
min. The homogenate of each sample was centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min. Then, each
213
obtained pellet was activated with PMA (20 µM) and kept at -20 ºC until the DNA
214
extraction was performed. Master Pure TM Complete DNA and RNA purification kit
215
(Epicenter, Madison, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions was used. For
216
molecular quantification, primers and probes for detecting genes of E. coli 23S rRNA as
217
well as the PMA-qPCR procedure were identical to those previously described
218
(Truchado et al., 2016). Standard curves were made using known concentrations of
219
genomic DNA isolated from E. coli CECT 515T. The E. coli concentration in the stock
220
solution was verified by plating on PCA.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
205
221 222
2.5. Detection of pathogenic microorganisms
223
For the detection of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC), E. coli O157:H7 and
224
Salmonella spp. in water samples, 10-L samples were filtered at the greenhouse through
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Modified Moore Swabs (MMS) as previously described (Sbodio et al., 2013). The
226
MMS were transferred aseptically into sterile stomacher plastic bags and transported to
227
the lab in refrigerated conditions. Once in the lab, 200 mL of 20 g/L buffered peptone
228
water (Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) was added to the bags that were incubated for 24 h
229
at 37 °C for enrichment. After incubation, a volume of 7 mL was transferred into 15 mL
230
centrifuge tubes and stored at −20 °C with 30% glycerol until the analyses were
231
performed.
RI PT
225
For the lettuce samples analyses, the homogenate described in paragraph 2.3.1
233
was supplemented with 125 mL of BPW (40 g/L) and homogenized by massaging by
234
hand the stomacher bags. Afterwards, bags were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for
235
enrichment, and then a volume of 7 mL was transferred into 15 mL centrifuge tubes and
236
stored at −20 °C with 30% glycerol until the analyses were performed.
M AN U
SC
232
Aliquots of 1 mL from each frozen sample were added to 9 mL of selective
238
enrichment broth specific for the target pathogens. Modified Buffered Peptone Water
239
(20 g/L) supplemented with sodium pyruvate (Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain; mBPWp)
240
incubated for 24 h at 42 °C was used for STEC and E. coli O157:H7. Tetrathionate
241
Broth (TT; Scharlau) incubated for 24 h at 37 °C was used for Salmonella. Prevalence
242
of pathogenic microorganisms in water (n= 16) and lettuce samples (n=30) were
243
performed using the Salmonella-STEC GeneDisc Pack in a Genedisc Cycler multiplex
244
PCR (Pall® Corporation, WA, USA) following manufacturer instructions. Confirmation
245
of presumptive positive samples was performed by isolation in selective culture media.
246
For STEC, CHROMagar STEC (CHROMagar, Paris, France) incubated for 24 h at 37
247
°C was used. For E. coli O157:H7, two culture media were used: CT-SMAC (Scharlab,
248
Barcelona, Spain) and CHROMagar O157 (CHROMagar, Paris, France), followed by
249
further confirmation using a latex test (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). For Salmonella, the
AC C
EP
TE D
237
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 250
IBISA method (AES Chemunex, Bruz, France) was used, followed by further
251
confirmation using a latex test (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK).
252 253
2.6. Physicochemical analysis of irrigation water Temperature, pH and ORP were measured using a multimeter (pH and redox 26,
255
Crison, Barcelona, Spain). For measuring UV254, water was filtered through 0.45 µm
256
syringe nylon filters (Fisherbrand-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), and a UV-VIS
257
spectrophotometer (Jasco V-630, Tokyo, Japan) and quartz cuvettes with a path length
258
of 1 cm (Hellma, Müllheim, Germany) were used.
260
M AN U
259
SC
RI PT
254
2.7. Presence of chlorates in irrigation water and in lettuce
Chlorates (ClO3-) content in water and lettuce was analysed by LC-MS as
262
described in Gil et al. (2016), using an analytical standard of chlorate (RTC, ICS-004-
263
100, Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, Spain) for quantification. Areas of the peaks detected by
264
MS were used for the quantification of chlorates. Results were expressed in mg/L and in
265
mg/kg for water and lettuce samples, respectively.
268
EP
267
2.8. Statistical analysis
Counts derived from microbiological analyses were log transformed and entered
AC C
266
TE D
261
269
in an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel, 2016). Results were compiled and graphs
270
were made using Sigma Plot 11.0 Systat Software, Inc. (Addilink Software Scientific,
271
S.L. Barcelona). SPSS statistics 21 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical
272
analysis at a significance level of 5% (p = 0.05). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and
273
Levene's test were used to assess normality and equality of variance, respectively. When
274
data was not following a normal distribution, nonparametric tests were applied. Mann–
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 275
Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine the difference between the
276
raw data of the indicators and the presence of pathogens. The Pearson’s correlation
277
coefficient was calculated (p<0.01) to assess links between physicochemical
278
characteristics of wastewater (SW and ClO2W).
280
3.
281
3.1. ClO2 treatment
RI PT
279 Results and discussion
In our study, the initial ClO2 concentration applied for the treatment of the
283
secondary wastewater ranged between 3.3 and 9.2 mg/L. These initial ClO2 doses were
284
necessary to reduce the levels of E. coli of reclaimed water below 2 log CFU/100 mL,
285
which is the threshold recommended for irrigation water in the guidance addressing
286
microbiological risks of fresh fruits and vegetables at primary production (EC, 2017b).
287
Fig. 1 shows the initial and residual ClO2 levels in the ClO2W samples taken the days in
288
which water and lettuce samples were taken for microbiological and physicochemical
289
analysis. The contact time between ClO2 and reclaimed water in the irrigation
290
distribution system was approximately 6 minutes. In all the cases, the ClO2 residual in
291
wastewater as measured in the irrigation emitter was less than 1 mg/L (<0.02 to 0.33
292
mg/L) to avoid any damage of phytotoxicity to the plants (WEAH, 2016).
M AN U
TE D
EP
Absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) was measured as an indicator of the organic
AC C
293
SC
282
294
matter content of the irrigation water distribution system. Values of UV254 for SW
295
ranged between 0.05 and 1.36 cm-1. Based on previous studies the increasing order of
296
reactivity of some disinfectants commonly used in the treatment of wastewater with
297
organic matter is: peracetic acid
298
Haute et al., 2017; Veschetti et al., 2003). Although ClO2 is less reactive with organic
299
matter than chlorine (Van Haute et al., 2015; Rodriguez & Serodes, 2001), the
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concentration of ClO2 is affected by the presence of organic matter. In the present study,
301
the concentration of organic matter in the water influenced the residual ClO2
302
concentration. For example, when lower concentrations of organic matter were observed
303
(UV254=0.05 cm-1 at day 4 and 0.08 cm-1 at day 6), higher ClO2 residuals were detected
304
(0.26 and 0.33 mg/L) (Fig. 1). A significant (p<0.01) negative correlation of -0,508 was
305
found between residual ClO2 concentration and UV254. Similar results have been
306
described in other studies (Tomás-Callejas et al., 2012; Praeger et al., 2016; Hassenberg
307
et al., 2017; Van Haute et al., 2017).
SC
RI PT
300
308
3.2. Changes in microbiological quality of irrigation water by chlorine dioxide
M AN U
309
In our study, when SW and ClO2W samples were analyzed by conventional plate
311
count methods, significant differences (p <0.05) in E. coli counts were observed (Fig.
312
2A). E. coli counts of SW and ClO2W samples ranged between 2.00 and 4.76 log
313
CFU/100 mL (IQR=3.32 – 3.82) and between 0.70 and 3.49 log CFU/100 mL
314
(IQR=1.59 – 2.18), respectively. Considering the mean counts of SW and ClO2W, it
315
was possible to calculate a mean reduction of 2.21 log CFU/100 mL. However, when E.
316
coli levels were quantified using the PMA-qPCR method, the average difference in E.
317
coli enumerations between SW and ClO2W was 1.07 logarithmic units, and no
318
significant differences were detected (p>0.05) (Fig. 2B). E. coli levels in SW and
319
ClO2W samples as determined by PMA-qPCR were 3.17 to 6.27 log cells/100 mL (IQR
320
4.19 – 5.10) and 2.71 to 5.46 log cells/100 mL (IQR 3.66 – 4.54), respectively (Fig.
321
2B). In agreement with our results, some studies have reported that the levels of E. coli
322
cells quantified by PMA-qPCR assay in different water samples such as drinking water,
323
wastewater, irrigation water and seawater were higher than those obtained by cultivation
324
based techniques (Van Frankenhuyzen et al., 2013; Gensberger et al., 2014; Li et al.,
AC C
EP
TE D
310
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2014; Truchado et al., 2016; López-Gálvez et al., 2018a). PMA is a DNA photoreactive
326
binding dye, which allows the differentiation between viable and dead cells, avoiding
327
an overestimation of results by qPCR (Gensberger et al., 2014; Truchado et al., 2016).
328
Therefore, the differences observed between PMA-qPCR and plate counts may be due
329
to the presence of viable but not cultivable (VBNC) bacteria. The results obtained could
330
indicate a bacteriostatic action of ClO2, which can induce the entrance of E. coli cells
331
into a VBNC state. Oliver et al., (2005) reported that the VBNC stage can be induced
332
when microorganisms are exposed to chemical disinfectants. The presence of VBNC
333
bacteria in the reclaimed wastewater due to water reclamation processes has been
334
demonstrated previously (Zhang et al., 2015; Lin et at., 2016; Kibbee and Örmeci,
335
2017). Recently, Kibbee and Örmeci (2017) have evaluated the levels of E. coli present
336
in secondary wastewater effluent after chlorine disinfection, showing that high numbers
337
of VBNC E. coli survive chlorination. Therefore, the use of conventional plate counting
338
methods might lead to an overestimation of the efficacy of the water disinfection
339
treatments (Zhang et al., 2015). It should be taken into account that the only culture
340
method used in the present study to detect injured E. coli cells after treatment was based
341
in the use of a selective culture medium and incubation for 24 h at 37 °C.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
325
Several studies have shown that different factors may influence the bactericidal
343
effect of ClO2 (Ayyildiz, et al., 2009; Junli et al., 1997). Some of the most important are
344
temperature, pH, and presence of organic matter. The temperature of water can strongly
345
influence the microbial inactivation capacity of ClO2. Barbeau et al. (2005) observed
346
that 0.25 mg/L of free ClO2 were sufficient to inactivate 99% of E. coli in water after 16
347
seconds at 30 °C. However, when the temperature of water was 5 °C, the same
348
reduction was reached only after 110 seconds. Junli et al. (1997) reported that 10 °C
349
increase of the water temperature doubles the inactivation power of ClO2 against
AC C
342
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT microorganisms. Although these studies reported the influence of temperature on the
351
microbiological inactivation capacity of ClO2, this influence was not observed in the
352
present study. The reductions of E. coli observed in reclaimed wastewater demonstrated
353
no correlation with water temperature (p>0.01) and this may be due to the narrow range
354
of temperature variation in the irrigation water (15.2 to 19.3 °C).
RI PT
350
Globally, water demand is predicted to increase significantly over the coming
356
decades. According to WWAP (2017), more than 70% of the water that is consumed all
357
over the world is used for agricultural irrigation. Therefore, there is a big potential for
358
the application of reclaimed water for irrigation (WHO, 2006). To evaluate the
359
microbiological suitability of reclaimed municipal wastewater for agricultural irrigation,
360
the recommendations and microbiological limits described in guidelines and regulations
361
should be used. For example, World Health Organization (WHO, 2006) recommends
362
that wastewater used for irrigation of agricultural crops likely to be eaten raw should
363
have a level of fecal coliforms ≤103 CFU/100 mL. In the United States, the Food and
364
Drug Administration (FDA) established a limit of 23 CFU/100 mL for E. coli
365
concentration in agricultural irrigation water when there is a direct contact with the
366
produce (Sugano et al., 2016). In Italy, the limit for E. coli concentration in treated
367
wastewater used for agricultural irrigation is 10 CFU/100 mL (Decreto Ministeriale,
368
2003). Spanish legislation establishes in reclaimed water in direct contact with produce
369
consumed raw a maximum of 102-103 CFU of E. coli per 100 mL in irrigation water
370
(number of sample units (n) = 10, threshold value for the number of E. coli (m) = 100
371
CFU/100 mL, maximum value (M) = 1000 CFU/100 mL, number of sample units where
372
the E. coli count may be between m and M (c) = 3) (Real Decreto 1620/2007, 2007).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
355
373
In the present study, E. coli concentration was above the 2 log/100 mL threshold
374
in all SW samples analyzed. On the other hand, due to the treatment with ClO2, 69.4%
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of ClO2W samples (25 out of 36) were in accordance with the Spanish legislation for E.
376
coli (Real Decreto 1620/2007, 2007) based on conventional plate counting techniques.
377
Therefore, even after ClO2 treatment, 30.6% of the ClO2W samples were not acceptable
378
for being used in overhead irrigation of raw consumed leafy green vegetables according
379
to the Spanish legislation.
380 381
RI PT
375
3.3. Microbiological characteristics baby lettuce irrigated with reclaimed water disinfected with chlorine dioxide
383
Culturable E. coli counts in baby lettuce irrigated with SW and ClO2W ranged
384
between <0.70 and 2.90 log CFU/g (IQR 0.69 – 1.30) and between <0.70 and 1.40 log
385
CFU/g (IQR 0.69 – 0.69), respectively, throughout the sampling period (Fig. 3A).
386
Significant differences (p <0.05) in culturable E. coli counts were observed between
387
baby lettuce irrigated with SW and ClO2W. These differences could be explained by the
388
higher microbial contamination of SW that caused a higher contamination over the
389
entire growing period. Similar results were demonstrated by Makkaew et al. (2016) and
390
Amahmid et al. (1999) investigating the influence of different levels of E. coli
391
contamination present in wastewater stabilization ponds in South Australia and
392
retention of E. coli contamination when compared with the other types of lettuces. In
393
our study, we used the variety red Oak leaf, whose morphology/topography may have
394
contributed to the retention of E. coli.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
395
SC
382
E. coli enumerations using PMA-qPCR rendered counts in SW and ClO2W
396
irrigated lettuce of 2.17 to 3.83 log cells/g (IQR 2.83 – 3.25) and 2.18 to 3.31 log cells/g
397
(IQR 2.55 – 2.98), respectively (Fig. 3B). PMA-qPCR analysis resulted in log counts
398
around 2 logarithmic units higher than those from the same samples analyzed by the
399
plating method in agreement with previous findings (Truchado et al., 2016). As
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mentioned before for water samples, the differences observed between plate count and
401
PMA-qPCR methods could be due to the presence of VBNC E. coli by the biocide and
402
the stress induced by the environmental conditions. The phyllosphere is a hostile habitat
403
for microorganisms due to nutrient limitation, shift in temperature and solar radiation
404
exposure, which can induce by VBNC state of the bacteria (Wilson and Lindow, 2000).
405
This phenomenon should be considered with caution because bacteria can persist for
406
long periods of time in this state and they could retain their virulent potential (Dinu and
407
Bach, 2011).
SC
RI PT
400
408
3.4. Correlation between E. coli levels and presence/absence of pathogens
M AN U
409
The prevalence of pathogens was detected by a multiplex PCR in 9 out of 16
411
samples of all irrigation water samples (56.2 %). Among the positive samples, 8
412
samples were confirmed using selective media and latex agglutination tests. Seven out
413
of eight corresponded to SW (1 Salmonella and 6 STEC) while only one sample of
414
ClO2W was positive for STEC. For the lettuce samples, the presence of pathogens was
415
detected in 4 out of 33 samples (13.33 %), by a multiplex PCR. Only 1 lettuce sample
416
irrigated with SW was confirmed for the presence of STEC using selective media and
417
latex agglutination tests. E. coli O157:H7 was not confirmed in any water or lettuce
418
sample (Table 2).
EP
AC C
419
TE D
410
Fig. 4 shows the relationship between the E. coli levels enumerated using plate
420
count and PMA-qPCR methods and the presence/absence of pathogenic bacteria in
421
irrigation water samples. For both quantification methods (plate count and PMA-qPCR)
422
positive samples for pathogenic bacteria showed significantly higher E. coli levels than
423
samples negative for the presence of pathogenic bacteria (Mann-Whitney U Test,
424
p<0.05) (Fig. 4B). The only exception was for SW when E. coli was enumerated using
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT conventional plating methods, which could be due to the high levels of E. coli found in
426
samples both positive and negative for pathogenic bacteria. Corroborating these
427
findings, Ferguson et al. (2012) and Truchado et al. (2016) reported that molecular
428
techniques are suitable techniques to predict the potential presence of pathogenic
429
bacteria in groundwater, and secondary reclaimed water, respectively.
RI PT
425
Other studies also found correlation between E. coli levels and the presence of
431
STEC and Salmonella in agricultural settings (Ceuppens et al., 2014; Holvoet et al.,
432
2014; López-Gálvez et al., 2014; Park et al., 2014; Castro-Ibáñez et al., 2015). These
433
findings support the hypothesis that considers E. coli as a good microbial indicator of
434
fecal contamination and the association with enteric pathogens.
M AN U
SC
430
435 436
3.5. Occurrence of chlorates in chlorine dioxide treated reclaimed water and irrigated baby lettuce
438
ClO2 has recently been used as an alternative to chlorine as it does not lead to the
439
formation of chlorinated DBPs after reaction with organic matter. However, chlorite and
440
chlorate ions (ClO2-, ClO3-) can be formed due to disproportionation reactions, and they
441
are the main DBPs from ClO2 that may have a significant human health risk.
EP
TE D
437
When irrigation water samples were analyzed for the presence of ClO3-, SW
443
showed very low levels (0.00-0.01 mg/L), while the concentration in ClO2W ranged
444
between 1.44 and 5.94 mg/L (Fig. 5). In other studies, lower chlorates concentrations
445
were detected in irrigation water treated with disinfectants (Nitsopoulos et al., 2014;
446
López-Gálvez et al., 2018a; López-Gálvez et al., 2018b). However, in those studies,
447
water with a much better microbiological and physicochemical quality was used and,
448
therefore, lower disinfectant concentration was needed for the treatment. In our study,
449
due to the characteristics of the treated water, a high initial concentration of ClO2 was
AC C
442
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 450
needed to achieve the desired microbiological reduction (Fig. 1). The concentration of
451
ClO3- showed a significant positive correlation (p<0.01) of 0.65 with the initial ClO2
452
concentration. According to Korn et al. (2002), lower concentration of ClO2 and lower levels of
454
organic matter can reduce the presence of chlorates in treated water. In the present
455
study, the high amount of organic matter present in the water influenced the increase of
456
chlorate concentration due to the higher disinfection capacity needed.
RI PT
453
In baby lettuce irrigated with ClO2W, concentration of ClO3- ranged between 1.13
458
and 8.49 mg/kg (Fig. 5). These levels are much higher than the maximum residue limit
459
for chlorate allowed in the European Union in food (0.01 mg/kg; EC, 2005), although
460
these levels are currently being revised (EC, 2014). In a previous study from our group
461
(López-Gálvez et al., 2018a), lower chlorate concentrations were detected in baby
462
spinach cultivated in open field and irrigated by overhead irrigation with ClO2-treated
463
surface water. However, much lower disinfectant concentrations were used compared
464
with the present study, leading to lower chlorate concentration in irrigation water and in
465
the crop. Other studies performed using irrigation water treated with chlorine-based
466
disinfectants reported lower chlorate concentration in the crop compared with our study,
467
probably due to the lower concentrations of disinfectants applied (Nitsopoulos et al.,
468
2014; López-Gálvez et al., 2018b).
469 470
4.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
457
Conclusions
471
ClO2 treatment reduced culturable E. coli concentration and the prevalence of
472
pathogenic bacteria in the water used for irrigation. However, when viable bacteria was
473
enumerated by molecular techniques combined with the use of PMA, no significant
474
differences were observed between untreated and ClO2 treated water, indicating a
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT potential bacteriostatic action of ClO2, which can induce the entrance of E. coli cells
476
into a VBNC state. Baby lettuce irrigated with ClO2 treated water beared lower
477
concentrations of culturable E. coli than the plants irrigated with the untreated
478
secondary effluent of the WWTP. However, as in the case of the water samples, the
479
differences between treatments were not significant when the enumeration of E. coli
480
was performed by PMA-qPCR. Detection of pathogens in lettuce was almost null, and,
481
as a consequence, the potential effect of ClO2 on the occurrence of pathogens in the
482
lettuce plants could not be detected. The results obtained suggest that the use of plate
483
count methods to estimate the efficacy of disinfection methods could lead to an
484
overestimation of the microbial reductions. In any case, the accumulation of chlorates in
485
the crop as a consequence of the ClO2 treatment exceeded the maximum recommended
486
limits of chlorates (0.01 mg/kg), making this treatment unsuitable to be applied under
487
the conditions evaluated in the present study.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
475
489
Acknowledgments
490
TE D
488
Authors are thankful for the financial support from the Center for Produce Safety Grant
Agreement
(Projects
492
(ProjectsAGL2013-48529-R and AGL2016-75878-R). Support provided by the
493
Fundación Séneca (19900/GERM/15) and the CNPq/MCTI with the PVE Project
494
313835/2013-6 is highly appreciated. P. Truchado is holder of a Juan de la Cierva
495
incorporation contract from the MINECO (IJCI-2014-20932).
2015-374
and
2017-01)
and
the
MINECO
AC C
EP
491
496 497
References
498
AHDB, Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. (2016). Chlorine and its
499
Oxides:
Chlorate
and
Perchlorate
Review.
Available
at:
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 500
https://horticulture.ahdb.org.uk/sites/default/files/research_papers/CP%20154a_R
501
eport_Final_2016.pdf [26 January 2017]. Ahmed, W., Richardson, K., Sidhu, J.P.S., & Toze, S. (2012). Escherichia coli and
503
Enterococcus spp. in rainwater tank samples: comparison of culture-based
504
methods and 23S rRNA gene quantitative PCR assays. Environ. Sci. Technol.,
505
46, 11370−11376.
RI PT
502
Allende, A., & Monaghan, J.M. (2015). Irrigation water quality for leafy crops: A
507
perspective of risks and potential solutions. Int. J. Environ. Health. Res., 12,
508
7457−7477.
SC
506
Amahmid, O., Asmama, S. & Bouhoum, K. (1999). The effect of wastewater reuse in
510
irrigation on the contamination level of food crops by Giardia cysts and Ascaris
511
eggs. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 49, 19–26.
513
Ayyildiz, O., Ileri, B., & Sanik, S. (2009). Impacts of water organic load on chlorine dioxide disinfection efficacy. J. Hazard. Mater., 168, 1092–1097.
TE D
512
M AN U
509
Barbeau, B., Desjardins, R., Mysore, C., & Prevost, M. (2005). Impacts of water quality
515
on chlorine and chlorine dioxide efficacy in natural waters. Water Res., 39, 2024–
516
2033.
EP
514
Becerra-Castro, C., Lopes, A.R., Vaz-Moreira, I., Silva, E.F., Manaia, C.M., & Nunes,
518
O.C. (2015). Wastewater reuse in irrigation: A microbiological perspective on
519 520
AC C
517
implications in soil fertility and human and environmental health. Environ. Int., 75, 117–135.
521
Ceuppens, S., Hessel, C.T., de Quadros Rodrigues, R., Bartz, S., Tondo, E.C., &
522
Uyttendaele, M. (2014). Microbiological quality and safety assessment of lettuce
523
production in Brazil. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 181, 67–76.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 524
Decol, L.T., Casarin, L.S., Hessel, C.T., Batista, A.C.F., Allende, A., & Tondo, E.C.
525
(2017). Microbial quality of irrigation water used in leafy green production in
526
Southern Brazil and its relationship with produce safety. Food Microbiol., 65,
527
105–113. Decreto Ministeriale 12 giugno 2003, n. 185.Regolamento recante norme tecniche per il
529
riutilizzo delle acque reflue in attuazione dell’articolo 26, comma 2, del D.Lgs. 11
530
maggio 1999, n. 15. (G.U. 23 luglio 2003, n. 169).
RI PT
528
Dinu L.-D., & Bach, S. (2011). Induction of viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli
532
O157:H7 in the phyllosphere of lettuce: a food safety risk factor. Appl. Environ.
533
Microbiol, 77, 8295–8302.
M AN U
SC
531
EC, European Commission, 2005. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (2005) of the
535
European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum
536
residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and
537
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union,
538
L 70/1, 16/03/2005.
TE D
534
EC, European Commission, 2014. Standing Committee of the Food Chain and Animal
540
Health on 12-13 June 2014, Statement as regards the presence of chlorate in food
541
and
542
https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_mrl_eu-1119-
feed.
Available
at
AC C
543
EP
539
2014_scfcah-statement.pdf. Accessed January 2018-
544
EC, European Commission, 2017a. Water re-use factsheet. EC - Water Reuse -
545
Background and policy context UN – Water and Jobs. Available at
546
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/pdf/water_reuse_factsheet_en.pdf.
547
Accessed January 2018.
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 548
EC, European Commission, 2017b. Commission notice on guidance document on
549
addressing microbiological risks in fresh fruits and vegetables at primary
550
production through good hygiene (2017/C 163/01). Official Journal of the
551
European Union, C 163/1, 23/05/2017. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) and ECDC (European Centre for Disease
553
Prevention and Control), 2015. The European Union summary report on trends
554
and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014.
555
EFSA Journal, 13, 4329. Available at: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4329 (Acessed
556
February 2016).
SC
RI PT
552
Ferguson, A.S., Layton, A.C., Mailloux, B.J., Culligan, P.J., Williams, D.E., Smartt,
558
A.E., Sayler, G.S., Feighery, J., McKay, L., Knappett, P.S.K., Alexandrova, E.,
559
Arbit, T., Emch, M., Escamilla, V., Ahmed, K.M., Alam, M.J., Streatfield, P.K.,
560
Yunus, M., & van Geen, A. (2012). Comparison of fecal indicators with
561
pathogenic rotavirus in groundwater. Sci. Total Environ., 431, 314–322.
TE D
M AN U
557
Gensberger, E.T., Polt, M., Konrad-Köszler, M., Kinner, P., Sessitsch, A., & Kostić, T.
563
(2014). Evaluation of quantitative PCR combined with PMA treatment for
564
molecular assessment of microbial water quality. Water Res., 67, 367-376
566
Gil, M.I., Marín, A., Andujar, S., & Allende A. (2016). Should chlorate residues be of concern in fresh-cut salads? Food Control, 60, 416–421.
AC C
565
EP
562
567
Hassenberg, K., Geyer, M., Mauerer, M., Praeger, U., & Herppich, W.B. (2017).
568
Influence of temperature and organic matter load on chlorine dioxide efficacy on
569
Escherichia coli inactivation. LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 79, 349–354.
570
Holvoet, K., Sampers, I., Seynnaeve, M., & Uyttendaele, M. (2014). Relationships
571
among hygiene indicators and enteric pathogens in irrigation water, soil and
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 572
lettuce and the impact of climatic conditions on contamination in the lettuce
573
primary production. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 171, 21–31.
574 575
Junli, H., Li, W., Nanqi, R., Fang, M., & Juli (1997). Disinfection effect of chlorine dioxide on bacteria in water. Wat. Res., 31, 607–613. Kibbee, R.J., & Örmeci, B. (2017). Development of a sensitive and false-positive free
577
PMA-qPCR viability assay to quantify VBNC Escherichia coli and evaluate
578
disinfection performance in wastewater effluent. J. Microbiol. Meth., 132, 139–
579
147.
SC
581
Korn, C., Andrews, R.C., & Escobar, M.D. (2002). Development of chlorine dioxiderelated by-product models for drinking water treatment. Water Res., 36, 330–342.
M AN U
580
RI PT
576
582
Li, D., Tong, T., Zeng, S., Lin,Y., Wu, S., & He, M. (2014). Quantification of viable
583
bacteria in wastewater treatment plants by using propidium monoazide combined
584
with quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR). J. Environ. Sci., 26, 299–306. Lin, Y.W., Li, D., Gu, A.Z., Zeng, S.Y. & He, M. (2016). Bacterial regrowth in water
586
reclamation and distribution systems revealed by viable bacterial detection assays.
587
Chemosphere, 144, 2165–2174.
TE D
585
López-Gálvez, F., Allende, A., Martinez-Sanchez, A., Tudela, J.A., Selma, M.V., & Gil,
589
M.I. (2010). Suitability of aqueous chlorine dioxide versus sodium hypochlorite
590
as an effective sanitizer for preserving quality of fresh-cut lettuce while avoiding
AC C
591
EP
588
by product formation. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 55, 53–60.
592
López-Gálvez, F., Allende, A., Pedrero-Salcedo, F., Alarcon, J.J., & Gil, M.I. (2014).
593
Safety assessment of greenhouse hydroponic tomatoes irrigated with reclaimed
594
and surface water. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 191, 97–102.
595
López-Gálvez, F., Gil, M.I., Pedrero-Salcedo, F., Alarcón, J.J., & Allende, A. (2016a).
596
Monitoring generic Escherichia coli in reclaimed and surface water used in
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 597
hydroponically cultivated greenhouse peppers and the influence of fertilizer
598
solutions. Food Control, 67, 90–95. López-Gálvez, F., Truchado, P., Sánchez, G., Aznar, R., Gil, M.I., Allende, A. (2016b).
600
Occurrence of enteric viruses in reclaimed and surface irrigation water:
601
relationship with microbiological and physicochemical indicators. J. Appl.
602
Microbiol., 121, 1180-1188.
RI PT
599
López-Gálvez, F., Gil, M.I., Meireles, A., Truchado, P., & Allende, A. (2018a).
604
Demonstration tests of irrigation water disinfection with chlorine dioxide in open
605
field cultivation of baby spinach. J. Sci. Food Agr., 98, 2973-2980.
SC
603
López-Gálvez, F., Andújar, S., Marín, A., Tudela, J.A., Allende, A., & Gil, M.I.
607
(2018b). Disinfection by-products in baby lettuce irrigated with electrolyzed
608
water. J. Sci. Food Agr., 98, 2981-2988..
M AN U
606
Makkaew, P., Miller, M., Cromar, N.J., & Fallowfield, H.J. (2016). The influence of the
610
microbial quality of wastewater, lettuce cultivars and enumeration technique when
611
estimating the microbial contamination of wastewater irrigated lettuce. J. Water
612
Health, 15, 228-238.
TE D
609
Nikolaou, A.D., & Lekkas T.D. (2001). The role of natural organic matter during
614
formation of chlorination by-products: a review. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 29,
615
63–77.
AC C
EP
613
616
Nitsopoulos, A., Glaumer, T., & Friedle, A. (2014). Chlorate- a contaminant in
617
foodstuff and drinking water. Agilent technologies Labor Friedle GMBH.
618
Available
619
http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/posters/Public/EPRW_Poster_Chlorat_
620
2014_V6.pdf.
at
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 621
Oliver, J.D., Dagher, M., Linden, K. (2005). Induction of Escherichia coli and
622
Salmonella typhimurium into the viable but nonculturable state following
623
chlorination of wastewater. J. Water Health, 3, 249−257. Oron, G. (2002). Effluent reuse in agricultural production in modern and traditional
625
irrigation technologies in the eastern Mediterranian. Chap. 9 International
626
Development
627
http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources/Publications/Pages/DRCBookDetails.aspx?Publ
628
icationID=276. Accessed 20 April 2017).
Centre,
(Available
at:
SC
Research
RI PT
624
Pachepsky, Y., Shelton, D.R., McLain, J.E.T., Patel, J., & Mandrell, R.E. (2011).
630
Irrigation waters as a source of pathogenic microorganisms in produce: a review.
631
In: Donald, L.S. (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy, vol. 113. Academic Press, pp. 73–
632
138.
M AN U
629
Park, S., Navratil, S., Gregory, A., Bauer, A., Srinath, I., Szonyi, B., Nightingale, K.,
634
Anciso, J., Jun, M., Han, D., Lawhon, S., & Ivanek, R. (2014). Farm management,
635
environment, and weather factors jointly affect the probability of spinach
636
contamination by generic Escherichia coli at the preharvest stage. Appl. Environ.
637
Microbiol., 80, 2504–2515.
EP
TE D
633
Pérez-Sautu, U., Sano, D., Guix, S., Kasimir, G., Pintó, R.M., & Bosch, A. (2012).
639
Human norovirus occurrence and diversity in the Llobregat river catchment,
640
AC C
638
Spain. Environ. Microbiol., 14, 494-502
641
Praeger, U., Herppich, W.B., & Hassenberg, K. (2016). Aqueous chlorine dioxide
642
treatment of horticultural produce: Effects on microbial safety and produce quality
643
e a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci., 58, 318-333.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 644
Real Decreto 1620/2007, 2007. de 7 de diciembre, por el que se establece el regimen
645
jurídico de la reutilización de las aguas depuradas, (BOE num. 294, 8 de
646
diciembre de 2007). Renault, F., Sancey, B., Charles, J., Morin-Crini, N., Badot, P.-M., Winterton, P., Crini,
648
G. (2009). Chitosan flocculation of cardboard-mill secondary biological
649
wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 155, 775–783.
651
Rodriguez, M.J., & Serodes, J.B. (2001). Spatial and temporal evolution of trihalomethanes in three water distribution systems, Water Res., 35, 1572–1586.
SC
650
RI PT
647
Sbodio, A., Maeda, S., López-Velasco, G., Suslow, T.V. (2013). Modified Moore swab
653
optimization and validation in capturing E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica
654
in large volume field samples of irrigation water. Food Res. Int., 51, 654–662.
655
Steele, M., & Odumeru, J. (2004). Irrigation water as source of foodborne pathogens on
656
M AN U
652
fruit and vegetables. J. Food Protect., 67, 2839–2849.
Sugano, J., Uyeda, J., Nakamura‐Tengan, L., Hollyer, J., Motomura, S., Kahana, J.,
658
Murakami, M., Mencher, F., Miyamoto, B., Gushiken, E., Akahoshi, K., Wong,
659
K., Reppun, F., Fiedler, K., & Sibonga, S. (2016). Dissecting the Food Safety
660
Modernization Act (FSMA) and Produce Rule & Good Agricultural Practices
661
(GAP). University of Hawaii at Manoa. College of Tropical Agriculture and
662
Human
664
EP
AC C
663
TE D
657
Resources.
Available
at:
https://cms.ctahr.hawaii.edu/Portals/224/SOAP/Policies/CTAHR%20FSMA%20
Grower%20Overview-Interpretations%20May%202016.pdf
665
Tomás-Callejas, A., López-Velasco, G., Valadez, A.M., Sbodio, A., Artés-Hernández,
666
F., Danyluk, M.D., et al. (2012). Evaluation of current operating standards for
667
chlorine dioxide in disinfection of dump tank and flume for fresh tomatoes. J.
668
Food Protect., 75, 304–313.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 669
Truchado, P., López-Gálvez, F., Gil, M.I., Pedrero-Salcedo, F., Alarcon, J.J., &
670
Allende, A. (2016). Suitability of different Escherichia coli enumeration
671
techniques to assess the microbial quality of different irrigation water sources.
672
Food Microbiol., 58, 29–35. EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Guidelines for water reuse. Office
674
of Wastewater Management Office of Water, Washington, D. Office of Research
675
and Development Cincinnati. Avaliable at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/tiff2png.cgi.
676
Accessed 5 July 2017.
SC
RI PT
673
WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). (2017). The United
678
Nations World Water Development Report 2017: Wastewater, The Untapped
679
Resource. Paris, UNESCO
M AN U
677
Uyttendaele, M., Jaykus, L-A., Amoah, P., Chiodini, A., Cunliffe, D., Jacxsens, L.,
681
Holvoet, K., Korsten, L., Lau, M., McClure, P., Medema, G., Sampers, I., & Jasti,
682
P.R. (2015). Microbial hazards in irrigation water: standards, norms, and testing to
683
manage use of water in fresh produce primary production. Compr. Rev. Food Sci.
684
F., 14, 336–356.
TE D
680
Van Frankenhuyzen, J.K., Trevors, J.T., Flemming, C.A., Lee, H., & Habash, M.B.
686
(2013). Optimization, validation, and application of a real-time PCR protocol for
687
quantification of viable bacterial cells in municipal sewage sludge and biosolids
AC C
688
EP
685
using reporter genes and Escherichia coli. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot., 40, 1251–126.
689
Van Haute, S., López-Gálvez, F., Gómez-López, V. M., Eriksson, M., Devlieghere, F.,
690
& Allende, A. (2015). Methodology for modeling the disinfection efficiency of
691
fresh-cut leafy vegetables wash water applied on peracetic acid combined with
692
lactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 208, 102–113.
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 693
Van Haute, S., Tryland, I., Escudero, C., Vanneste, M., & Sampers, I. (2017). Chlorine
694
dioxide as water disinfectant during fresh-cut iceberg lettuce washing:
695
Disinfectant demand, disinfection efficiency, and chlorite formation. LWT - Food
696
Sci. Technol., 75, 301–304. Veschetti, E., Cutilli, D., Bonadonna, L., Briancesco, R., Martini, C., & Cecchini, G.
698
(2003). Pilot-plant comparative study of peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite
699
wastewater disinfection. Water Res., 37, 78–94.
RI PT
697
WEAH, Water Education Alliance for Horticulture, Treatment Technologies: Chlorine
701
dioxide. (2016). Available at: http://watereducationalliance.org/keyinfo.asp.
702
Accessed January 2018.
M AN U
SC
700
Wilson, M., & Lindow, S.E. (2000). Viable but nonculturable cells in plant-associated
704
bacterial populations. In Colwell, R.R. & Grimes D.J. (Eds.) Non-culturable
705
Microorganisms in the Environment (pp. 229–241). ASM Press, Washington,
706
D.C.
TE D
703
WHO, World Health Organization. (2006). WHO guidelines for the safe use of
708
wastewater, excreta and grey water. Wastewater use in agriculture. Available
709
from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241546832_eng.pdf. Accessed
710
5 July 2017.
EP
707
Zhang, S., Ye, C., Lin, H., Lv, L. & Yu, X. (2015). UV disinfection induces a VBNC
712
state in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Sci. Technol.,
713
AC C
711
49, 1721-1728.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure Legends
715
Figure 1. Initial and residual concentrations of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) in treated water
716
from the secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant (ClO2W) used for irrigation
717
of lettuce cultivated in a greenhouse. The figure shows only the data obtained in days
718
when lettuce and water samples for microbiological and physicochemical analyses were
719
taken.
720
Figure 2. Boxplot representing E. coli counts (log CFU/100 mL) of water from the
721
secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant untreated (SW) and ClO2 treated
722
(ClO2W) used for irrigation of lettuce cultivated in a greenhouse. (A) Counts obtained
723
by conventional plate count method. (B) Counts obtained by PMA–qPCR molecular
724
quantification method. In a boxplot, the bottom and top of the boxes represent the
725
quartiles (25th and 75th percentile), with the line inside the box representing the
726
median. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05).
727
Figure 3. Boxplot representing E. coli counts (log CFU/g) of baby lettuce irrigated with
728
water from the secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant untreated (SW) and
729
ClO2 treated (ClO2W) and cultivated in a greenhouse. (A) Counts obtained by
730
conventional plate count method. (B) Counts obtained by PMA–qPCR molecular
731
quantification method. In a boxplot, the bottom and top of the boxes represent the
732
quartiles (25th and 75th percentile), with the line inside the box representing the
733
median. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05).
734
Figure 4. Boxplot representing E. coli counts (log CFU/100 mL) in the subset of water
735
samples with either absence or presence of pathogens in the water from the secondary
736
effluent of a wastewater treatment plant untreated (SW) and ClO2 treated (ClO2W) used
737
for irrigation of lettuce cultivated in a greenhouse. (A) E. coli counts obtained by
738
conventional plate counting method. (B) E. coli counts obtained by PMA–qPCR
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
714
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT quantification method. In a boxplot, the bottom and top of the boxes represent the
740
quartiles (25th and 75th percentile), with the line inside the box represents the median.
741
Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05).
742
Figure 5. Chlorate concentration in water samples (mg/L) and baby lettuce (mg/kg)
743
irrigated with secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant untreated (SW) and
744
ClO2 treated (ClO2W) for irrigation during cultivation in a greenhouse.
RI PT
739
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
745
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 1
Initial ClO2 Residual ClO2
9
RI PT
8
6
SC
5 4 3 2 1 0 20
18
17
M AN U
ClO2 (mg/L)
7
13
11
AC C
EP
TE
D
Days before harvest
6
4
0
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 2
6 a
E. coli (Log cfu/ 100 mL)
5 4
SC
b
M AN U
3 2 1 0 a
3
D TE EP
4
a
AC C
E. coli (Log cells/100 mL)
6 5
RI PT
AA
2 1 0
SW
ClO2W
Irrigation water types
BB
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3
A
RI PT
a
SC
3
2
b
M AN U
E. coli (Log cfu/g)
4
1
0
a
2
D TE EP
3
a
AC C
E. coli (Log cells/g)
4
1
0
SW
ClO2W
Irrigation water types
B
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 4.
A 7
a a
4
0
a
3
TE
B A
b
AC C
2
B
EP
4
D
6 5
B
SC
2 1
E. coli (Log cells/100 mL)
A
3
7
RI PT
5
M AN U
E. coli (Log cfu/100 mL)
6
1
Pathogen: Presence Absence
0
SW
ClO2W Irrigation water types
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 5
SW Water ClO2W Water SW Lettuce ClO2W Lettuce
9.0 8.0
RI PT
7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0
SC
3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 20
18
13
11
6
Days before harvest
AC C
EP
TE D
2 3 4
M AN U
Chlorate concentrations (mg/L or mg/kg)
1
4
0
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. pH, temperature, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), and UV254 of secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant untreated (SW) and ClO2 treated (ClO2W) for irrigation of baby lettuce cultivated in a greenhouse. SW pH
Temperature ORP (°C)
(mV)
pH
Temperature
ORP
(°C)
(mV)
19.1
477
16.7
493
6.57
20.0
460
7.75
-
-
RI PT
Days before harvest
ClO2W
6.43
19.3
472
6.36
18
6.34
16.7
482
6.38
13
6.31
19.2
463
11
7.60
-
-
6
8.13
16.5
431
7.95
16.9
432
4
8.01
15.2
514
7.89
15.3
791
0
7.58
16.9
450
7.51
17.0
698
M AN U
TE D EP AC C
SC
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Presence and absence of pathogen microorganisms in water samples and baby lettuce irrigated with secondary effluent of a wastewater
Samples type
Salmonella
STEC
Genedisc®
Confirmed
Genedisc®
SW
5/8
1/5
7/8
ClO2W
1/8
0/1
Lettuce
Genedisc®
Confirmed
SW
2/15
0/2
ClO2W
2/15
0/2
E. coli O157:H7
Genedisc®
Confirmed
6/7
6/8
0/6
1/8
1/1
1/8
0/1
Genedisc®
Confirmed
Genedisc®
Confirmed
2/15
1/2
1/15
0/1
1/15
0/1
1/15
0/1
M AN U
TE D EP
AC C
Confirmed
SC
Water
RI PT
treatment plant untreated (SW) and ClO2 treated (ClO2W) for irrigation during cultivation in a greenhouse.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights
RI PT
ClO2 is a suitable treatment for irrigation water ClO2 reduced levels of cultivable E. coli in water and in irrigated lettuce Levels of viable by no-cultivable E. coli were higher than cultivable E. coli Plate count might led to overestimation of the efficacy of the treatment. Irrigation with ClO2-treated water led to the accumulation of chlorate in the crop
AC C
EP
TE
D
M AN U
SC