Supersonic expansion cooling of electronically excited OH radicals

Supersonic expansion cooling of electronically excited OH radicals

SUPERSONK 8 April 1963 CHEMICAL PHYSKS LETTERS \‘olume 96. number 3 EXPANSION COOLING OF ELECTRONICALLY EXCITED OH RADICALS A.-l-. DKOEGE and P...

252KB Sizes 46 Downloads 45 Views

SUPERSONK

8 April 1963

CHEMICAL PHYSKS LETTERS

\‘olume 96. number 3

EXPANSION

COOLING OF ELECTRONICALLY

EXCITED OH RADICALS

A.-l-. DKOEGE and P.C. EirfGELKING

Supcr.ur~x nuzzle woiing c~fcxcitcd-srrlre molsculw radicals produced in a corona discharge is demonstuted and in\ck:i;.~tcd using hydro\j I rJdlc&. Ror~rional rcmperatures of I1 _ + 2 I; and tibrational temperatures of 3400 + 300 K are 1ypk-.dI? obux\rd in rhc 011 A ‘Z+ SIJIC.

cals by an electric discharge in the nozzle throat. in casts dispensing with the need for a high-powered laser. Further. the mecfmisn of cooling appears to operate differently on the various internal degrees of freedom, and we show this here. It is generally difficult to strike a uniform discharge in a high-pressure gas, and when struck, usually an arc form in place of the diffuse glow that is characteristic at low pressures [5]. CJnly on the order of 0.1 W of power is necessary to dissociate molecules in a 100 PI diameter nozzle: thus an inexpensive. low-power highvoltage supply could supplant the laser if an efficient method of maintaining the discharge were available. A corona discharge is such a method.

I_ Inrroduction

many

.-\ number c,F techniques r.idicak. including

~~~s-pk~se -_

IlldJSlJhkS.

tron ~nipact

IX+? he used to prodllcc pyrolysis. reactions with 9IOIll abstractio11. photolysis. and elec[ 1 1. Uni~xruri~tely. n10s.t of these tech-

nques prodwc nmtionally hot products. often wdcsir.rblc for spccrroscopic or reaction studies. We repnrf J siiilple nlcIhod for producing in 2 1nolecu13r IC’Il~>tation.Jl> cold ground and excited SI~ICS of IIIOkcul.ir radicals. tk~th ground and rxitcd stales of rotationally coici pusilivc wns kne b een observed in posl-e.~pansion

clcLtron irnpxt on molecu1.m beams [2]_ Cold neutral rJdlc.J> are not readily produced by this technique beCJIISC tllc drpJrrurr ofhca~~ atomic species from the prccu~sor. as opposed to a light electron in the case of iw:t/Jtlotl. imparts a signillcant recall that must be

2. Experimental

.d~sorbed b\ ths rJdica1 thus produced.

Fig. 1 shows schematically how this is done. A glass is made by a technique similar to that described by Kay et al. [6]_ A 6 nun thick-walled glass tube is

This recoil is and lranslational motion 01‘ the radical, and prevents use of post-expsnsion r.tdicai gencrarion JS a general Inems of producing gold rdiktls. (‘old rJdicJ1 species h.~e becri produced in a supersonic SOIIICC by photolyzing the radical precursor in the r~ouic throat u ith a laser [3_4)_ If the radicals are sufficiently dilure in a11 inert carrier gas, and relasation is f2st comparrd to radical destroying reactions, this ap pedrs 10 be ~11 attrxtive mech&sm for producing lowteInperJture niokcul~r radicals. Nevertheless. we have ~LWII~ and rested a simple method for producing radip~11iI~weciin

316

rotatloudl.

kibration&

results

nozzle

flame heared until closure is achieved. Subsequently, the tube is ground back until a suitable diameter openkg is formed, typically 2% 100 pm. This is fastened in the vacuum apparatus with an Ultra-Torr * fitting. A small gauge tungsten wire is introduced through a “tee” fitting attached to the glass tube. and positioned with one end just behind the nozzle aperture on the high-pressure side. When this wire is energized with

* CJjOn Co.. 32550 Old South Miles Road, Solon. Ohio.

0 009-26 14/83/0000-0000/S

03.00 0 1983 North-Holland

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LJTl-TERS

Volume 96, mrmber 3

100

8 April 1963

01,(2) in each band. These originate fromJ’ = l/2 lev& of v’ = 0 and v’ = 1, the lowest levels in each rotational stack. The almost complete absence of other yc

lines indicates rotational cooling of the radical. The intensities of the P1( 1) and P, (2) lines in both the O-O and l-l bands indicate a rotational temperature consistent with 11 2 2 K. The relative u’ = 1 intensities are consistent with a vibrational temperature of 3400 + 300 K.

Fii.

1. Schematic

of corona

discharge

exited

nozzle.

high voltage (typically 15 kV through stabilizing resistors limiting current to 50 PA), a small corona discharge forms at the tip of this tungsten wire. The current passes through the gas in the nozzle throat. making connection to ground by ionic and electronic conduction in the vacuum on the opposite side of the nozzle. Typical of radical spectra we have observed, fig_ 2 shows a spectrum of the O-O and l-l bands of the A ‘F-X zll emission from electronically excited OH produced by dissociating =I 8 Torr Hz0 in 4 atm of He passing through a 35 .um nozzle- The emission from the region x0.5 mm in front of the nozzle is imaged on the 100 pm slits of a 1.26 m Spex monochromator and detected with an RCA CA3 1000 photomultiplier_. Notice the three strong lines’ PI(l), PI,(l) and * Noration

is consistent

with that of Dieke and Crosswhite

171.

O-O bend

p,(l)

1 p,(2)

q-

_

308

3i4

310

rvoveleng:h

316

Cnrr)

Fig 2. The O-O and l- 1 bands in the A-X emission of exOH radicals, taken under pandon cooled A 22+ excited-state equivalent conditions. Peaks labeled P,(l), P,,(l), 2nd 0,201 correspond lo transitions from the lowest rotational levels in LJ*= 0 and u’ = 1 in the respective band% Rotational temperature is 11 t Z I(. while vibrational temperature is 3100 f 300 K, as obrained from the relative intensities in the spectra.

3. Discussion Two alternative methods of producing rotationally cold excited-state OH appear possible_ As one possibility, the OH radicals produced in the nozzle throat are first cooled by expansion, then excited by a low-momentum transfer mechanism, such as electron impact.

to electronically excited, rotationally cold levels from which they radiate. Since electron impact, or other excitation mechanisms. would impart one or more units of angular momentum (consistent with dipole or

higher mu!tipole) in a significant fraction of the excitations, the noticable deficiency of population in rotational levels above J = l/2 is evidence

that this post-

expansion excitation occurs rarely. As another likeiihood, the discharge produces hot OH in both ground and excited states. which subsequently collisionally relax in the expansion_ Since the radiative lifetime (0.69 11s) [S] is greater than the 0.5 JIS flight time, excited radicals made in the nozzle are likely to be in the post-expansion region we observe. To be consistent with the observed spectra, rotational relaxation must be fast compared to the 0.69 ps radiative lifetime, while vibrational relaxation must be comparably slow. We believe that this mechanism accounts for the majority of the cold OH radicals. Interestingly, while the higb vibrational temperature of the radicals is comparable to the temperature (3500 K) one would expect in the nozzle throat if the dissociating power were equipartitioned over the mass flow. the observed rotational temperature is smaller than that obtainable by expansion cooling from such a hi:& “average” temperature [9]. Because a relatively large portion of the discharge power is deposited in molecular components, owing to their higher electron impact cross sections for momentum transfer and excitation [lo], thermal equilibrium between translational. rota317

Volume 96. number 3

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

tional. and vibrational modes would be unlikely in the discharge, and the originally higher vibrational temperatures expected in the discharge would enhance the asymmetry of the rot3tional and vibrational temperatures 3s observed. Thus, even in the nozzle throat. an “werage temper3ture” is an artificial concept. and both discharge 3nd expansion are conducive to low rotational temperatures. These results 3re typical of the cooling of both gou11d .md exited states of other molecular radic3ls obt.rinahle in the coron3 disch.trge. We are currently using this cold r,tdical production technique in contunctwn with laser-induced fluorescence to study polyatomic r,tdic.tl ground and excited state.

Acknowledgement We xkn~~rledge support from the National Science Fcnmdatton. the Department of Energy. and the ,\lurdocl. Foundation during this work.

8 April 19S3

References [ I] D.W. Setser. ed., Reactive intermediates in the gas phase (Academic Press. New York. 1979). [ 2] T-A. Miller. B.R. Zegarski, T.J. Sears and V.E. Bondyhey. J. Chem. Phys. 84 (1980) 3154. [ 3 1 D.L. Monts. T.G. Dietz. M.A. Duncan and R-E. Smalley, Chem. Phys. 4.5 (1980) 133: D.E. Powers. J.B. Hopkins and R.E. SmalIey. J. Phyr Chem. 85 (1981) 2711. [4] A.T. Droege and P.C. EngeIkin_e. unpubEshed. [ 5 1 A. van Lngel. Ionized gasses (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1965). 161 B.D. Kay. T.D. Lindenman and A.W. Castleman Jr.. Rev. Sci. Instr. 53 (1982) 473_ [ 71 G.H. Dieke and H.\I. Crosswhite. J. Quant. Spectry. Radiat. Transfer 2 (1962) 97. [ SJ K-R. German. J. Chem. Phys. 62 (1975) 2584; 63 (1975) 2512. [ 91 I1.N’. Licpmann and A. Rosko. Elements of _easdynamics t\Viley_ ;r;e\\ York. 1957) p. 10: It. Ashkenkas and F.S. Sherman. in: Rarefied g3s dynxnits, 4th Symposium, ed. J.H. Leeuued (.Acddemic Press. New York. 1966). [ IO] J.L. P.rck. K.E. VoshaII and A.V. Phelps. Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 2084: Y. ttakalra. J. Phys. Sot. Japm 36 (1974) 1127: G. Sen_e and I_ Linder. J. Phyr B9 (1076) 1.539: K;. Rohr. J. Phys. BlO (1977) 1735; D. Andrick and A. Bitsch, J. Phys. B8 (1975) 393.