Journal Pre-proof Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for polychlorinated biphenyl detection: Recent developments and Future Prospects Jie Cheng, Peilong Wang, Xiao-Ou Su PII:
S0165-9936(19)30295-X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115836
Reference:
TRAC 115836
To appear in:
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Received Date: 13 May 2019 Revised Date:
1 February 2020
Accepted Date: 1 February 2020
Please cite this article as: J. Cheng, P. Wang, X.-O. Su, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for polychlorinated biphenyl detection: Recent developments and Future Prospects, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115836. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for
2
polychlorinated biphenyl detection: Recent developments
3
and Future Prospects
4
Jie Cheng, Peilong Wang*, Xiao-Ou Su**
5 6
Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technologies for Agro-products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural
7
Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
8 9 10
*Corresponding author. Peilong Wang (P. L. Wang); Fax: +86 010 82106580; Email:
[email protected]. **Corresponding author. Xiao-Ou Su (X. O. Su); Fax: +86 010 82106580; Email:
[email protected].
11 12
1
13
Abstract:
14
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have gained much attention for their carcinogenic,
15
teratogenic, and mutagenic properties. Although banned in the 1970s, PCBs are still
16
frequently found worldwide in environment, animal-origin food and natural waters. Therefore,
17
the development of determination methods is an indispensable step for the monitoring of
18
PCBs. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is an emerging technique for the
19
chemical analysis. With the advantages of excellent sensitivity and significant enhancement
20
to identify the target, SERS has become a promising alternative method for PCBs analysis.
21
This paper comprehensively reviews the recent progress of SERS development in the
22
determination of PCBs, mainly focusing on the preparation of SERS substrates. As the
23
current SERS research on PCBs analysis is still in an early stage, there are several hurdles for
24
further advancing SERS for complex samples. This review includes our discussion on the
25
current challenges and outlook on real-word applications of SERS in PCBs analysis.
26 27 28
Keywords: surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; polychlorinated biphenyl; substrates; matrix; detection
29
2
30
1. Introduction
31
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which are synthetic organic chemicals consisting of two
32
phenyl rings with substitution of hydrogen with chlorine at any of the 10 hydrogen sites, have
33
209 different possible congeners. These compounds are used as coolants, lubricants, paint
34
additives, carbonless copy paper, plastics, and in electric transformers and capacitors. PCBs
35
are classified as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) as they exhibit significant toxicity,
36
bioaccumulation, environmental persistence, and long-distance migration. Several reports
37
have shown that a large number of people have been exposed to PCBs via food
38
contamination. Consumption of PCB contaminated rice oil in Japan in 1968 and Taiwan in
39
1979 caused nail and mucous membrane pigmentation as well as eyelid swelling, fatigue,
40
nausea, and vomiting. PCBs can also persist in the environment, bioaccumulate through the
41
food chain, and pose a constant threat to human health and the overall ecosystem [1]. Thus,
42
PCBs were banned by the United States Congress in 1979 and were listed as a POP at the
43
Stockholm Convention (managed by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)) in
44
2001. Depending on the number and position of the chlorine atoms, PCB congeners have
45
been assigned IUPAC numbers ranging from 1 to 209. Among these compounds, co-planar
46
and non-planar PCBs are distinguished based on whether the two benzene rings exist in the
47
same plane. Co-planar PCBs adopt a configuration similar to those of polychlorinated
48
dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and are commonly referred to as “dioxin-like” PCBs (DL-PCBs)
49
demonstrating similar toxicity. DL-PCBs have been assigned toxic equivalency factors (TEFs)
50
by comparing their toxicity to that of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD),
51
which is the most toxic dioxin with an assigned TEF value of 1 (Table 1) [2].
52
Table 1. Dioxin-like PCBs (non-ortho PCBs + mono-ortho PCBs) and their respective TEF values. IUPAC No.
IUPAC Name
TEF values
non-ortho PCBs 77
3,3’,4,4’-tetrachlorobiphenyl
0.0001
81
3,4,4’,5-tetrachlorobiphenyl
0.0003
126
3,3’,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl
0.1
169
3,3’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl
0.03
mono-ortho PCBs 105
2,3,3’,4,4’-pentachlorobiphenyl 3
0.00003
53
114
2,3,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
118
2,3’,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
123
2’,3,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
156
2,3,3’,4,4’,5-hexachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
157
2,3,3’,4,4’,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
167
2,3’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
189
2,3,3’,4,4’,5,5’-hepachlorobiphenyl
0.00003
In addition to DL-PCBs, so-called “indicator PCBs” (Table 2) are often selected as suitable
54
representatives for risk assessments of foodstuffs and environmental samples. For example,
55
six indicator PCBs (PCB 28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180) are target compounds for the risk
56
assessments of food and foodstuffs as prescribed by the European Food Safety Authority
57
(EFSA) [3]. In China, the maximum residue limit (MRL) of seven indicator PCBs, including
58
PCB 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, and 180, in aquatic animals and products has been set as 0.5
59
mg/kg [4], which is the same level selected by Global Environmental Monitoring Scheme
60
(GEMS). The focus on the constant threat to human health and the strict regulation about
61
MRL have indicated the necessary of developing highly sensitive quantification and
62
confirmation methods for the monitoring of PCBs. Table 2. Names of the indicator PCBs.
63 IUPAC No.
IUPAC Name
28
2,4,4’-trichlorobiphenyl
52
2,2’,5,5’-tetrachlorobiphenyl
101
2,2’,4,5,5’-pentachlorobiphenyl
118
2,3’,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl
138
2,2’,3,4,4’,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl
153
2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl
180
2,2’,3,4,4’,5,5’-heptachlorobiphenyl
64
Generally, high resolution gas chromatography combined with high resolution mass
65
spectrometry (HRGC-HRMS) is the gold standard for PCB determination and laboratory
66
confirmation. Other confirmation methods include two-dimensional gas chromatography with
67
time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOF/MS) [5], gas chromatography coupled to a
68
triple quadruple mass spectrometer (GC-QQQ-MS/MS) [6], and atmospheric-pressure
69
chemical ionization gas chromatography coupled with a tandem quadruple mass spectrometry 4
70
(APGC-MS/MS) [7]. These conventional detection methods are very accurate, but require
71
time-consuming sample pretreatment steps, expensive instrumentation, and sophisticated
72
technical operators, which are unsuitable for on-site and rapid detection. To reduce the cost of
73
monitoring PCBs, other bioanalytical screening methods have been developed, including
74
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [8] and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD)
75
[9], which can detect dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated
76
dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and DL-PCBs simultaneously. In addition, a detection method based
77
on chemical reporter gene assays [10] has also been developed. The testing results are usually
78
calculated as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) toxic equivalents. Despite
79
the success of these rapid and simple bio-analytical screening methods, many challenges
80
remain. The ELISA technique depends on the specific interaction between antibodies and
81
antigens, but has a high rate of “false positives” for PCB detection. The preparation of
82
PCB-antibodies to identify multiple of PCBs simultaneously is difficult. For the EROD
83
method, the actual PCB concentrations could not be directly obtained and detection recovery
84
is impossible. In addition, other emerging fast detection techniques have recently been
85
developed to detect trace amounts of PCBs, including fluorescence probes [11], biomimetic
86
sensors [12], fluorescence quantitative PCR [13], electrochemical sensors [14], and
87
surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [15]. These novel detection methods have
88
improved existing screening methods and attracted increasing amounts of attention.
89
The SERS technique has been developed over the past two decades and is considered to be
90
a promising analytical tool for label-free molecular diagnostics. As a powerful analytical tool
91
for trace detection, the SERS technique has been widely used in drug discovery [16], food
92
safety [17], environment monitoring [18], and biomedical diagnostics [19]. So far, a few
93
reviews about the SERS detection of harmful compounds have been published in the past.
94
For instance, Jiang described a general process for SERS-based common harmful chemical
95
residues [20]. Pang, Yang, and He reviewed the SERS detection of synthetic chemical
96
pesticides [21]. Recently, Yaseen and his co-workers focused on the functionalization
97
techniques for improving SERS substrates [22]. However, these reviews mainly focused on
98
the common harmful chemical residues in the area of food safety. No review is available on 5
99
advanced SERS techniques for the detection of POPs, especially PCBs. Therefore, in the
100
current review, the principles of SERS are discussed first. Then the current developments of
101
SERS for PCBs detection including the critical technique points are discussed. Furthermore,
102
the future use, limitations, and development trends of SERS for PCB detection are
103
emphasized.
104 105 106
2. Theoretical basis of SERS The Raman signal intensity can be significantly amplified when the target molecules are
107
adsorbed or come into close proximity to the nanostructured noble metal surfaces, a
108
phenomenon first observed in the early 1970s [23] (Fig. 1). The nanostructure-induced
109
enhancement can reach as high as 14 to 15 orders of magnitude compared to that of the
110
corresponding bulk Raman signal. In the stimulation of the two enhancement mechanisms
111
analytes at the extremely low concentration can be detected by SERS even down to the level
112
of a single molecule [24]. The first mechanism called electromagnetic (EM) enhancement
113
dominated the SERS effect by an enhancement of more than 105 in most cases, which is
114
caused by the local surface plasmon resonances (LSPR) and depends on the shape and size of
115
the nanostructures [25]. The other mechanism is chemical enhancement (CM), which is
116
caused by a resonance Raman like process associated with the charge transfer (CT) between
117
the surface of a metallic nanostructure and the molecule analytes by the enhancement factor
118
of 102 [26]. The CT state increases the polarizability of analytes, resulting in a higher degree
119
of Raman transition. Generally, SERS is simultaneously generated from both EM and CT
120
mechanisms.
121
The remarkable characteristics of its rapid response, ultra-sensitivity, specificity, and
122
simple operation make SERS particularly well suited for PCBs monitoring, especially for
123
field tests. This method can be used to screen large numbers of samples to verify presumptive
124
positive samples.
125
3. Current advancement of SERS in PCBs detection
126
In SERS detection procedure, the metal nanostructured substrate and sample cleanup are
127
fundamental components, which mainly includes substrate preparation, sample pretreatment,
128
and Raman instrument analysis. However, the current research is still at an early stage and the 6
129
reported target PCBs are largely based on a pure format without spiking into any matrix or
130
real samples from the field. There were few reports about the sample cleanup before SERS
131
detection of PCBs. In contrast, significant progress has been made towards the preparation of
132
SERS substrates in the past few years (Table 3). In summary, four kinds of substrates have
133
been prepared to enhance the Raman signal of PCBs. Table 3. The substrates preparation for SERS detection of PCBs in recent years.
134
SERS Substrates
Targets
Matrixes
Sensitivity (LOD)
Ref.
50 pM
[36]
/
[37]
Modified with alkanethiol and perfluoroalkanethiol
PCB-47, PCB-77
standard solution
β-CD modified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)
PCB-40, PCB-54, PCB-65, PCB-80
agriculture soil
Ag-nanowire tip array and modified with β-CD
PCB-77
standard solution
10-10 M
[38]
β-CD coated SiO2 @ Au @ Ag core-shell nanoparticles
PCB-3, PCB-77
standard solution
10-6 M
[39]
Ag nanosheet-assembled micro-hemispheres modified with HS-β-CD
PCB-77
standard solution
10-7 M
[40]
glutathione (GSH) functionalized Au NPs
PCB-47
rangeland extract
/
[41]
rGO-AgNPs
PCB-47, PCB-77
standard solution
10-7 M
[52]
GO wrapped flower-like Ag microparticles (Ag @ GO)
PCB-3, PCB-77
standard solution
10-4 M
[53]
AgNPs @ PAN-nanohump
PCB-77
standard solution
10-5 M
[30]
Ag-nanosheet-grafted polyamide-nanofibers modified with
PCB-3, PCB-77
standard solution
1.6×10-5 M
[32]
ZnO-NRs decorated with Ag-NRs and Ag spheres
PCB-77
standard solution
10-11 M
[33]
AgNPs modified with Fe3O4
PCB-77
standard solution
10-8 M
[34]
Modified with a –SH3 group
PCB-77
standard solution
10-8 M
[42]
Ag-nanorod modified with aptamers
PCB-77
standard solution
1.0×10-8 M
[75]
PCB-29,
PCB-52,
7
land
soil
Ag-nanorod modified with aptamers
PCB-77
standard solution
3.3×10-8 M
[76]
DNA aptamer modified SiO2 @ Au core shell nanoparticles
PCB-77
standard solution
1 µM
[77]
135 136
3.1 Substrates possess high density of “hot spots”
137
As is known to us, the EM enhancement mechanism dominates the SERS effect, showing
138
an enhancement of ˃105 in most cases, arising from LSPR depending on the shape and size of
139
the nanostructures. The LSPR is usually present at the gaps between the nanostructures,
140
resulting in so called “hot spots” that stimulate the SERS effects. A good substrate possesses
141
a high density of “hot spots” to achieve high sensitivity for SERS detection. The design and
142
preparation of a high density of “hot spots” is key for sensitive SERS detection. A variety of
143
substrates besides gold and silver nanoparticles (Au and Ag NPs) have been successfully
144
prepared and applied as SERS substrates (Fig. 2), including flower-like Ag nanoparticles [27],
145
Ag nanoparticle hierarchical structures [28], sea urchin-like Au micro-particles [29], Ag
146
nanoparticles decorated on nanohumps [30], and gecko-inspired nano tentacle [31]. The hot
147
spots reside within the nano-sized gaps in the inter space of the abovementioned
148
nanostructures and the SERS signals of the target molecules are largely governed by their
149
capture by the hot spots. Li et al. developed a facile SERS fabrication method using large
150
scale films, with one surface consisting of Ag NP decorated polyacrylonitrile (PAN)
151
nanohumps (Ag NPs @ PAN-nanohump) [30]. The designed 3D hybrid exhibited a high
152
density of hot spots and large surface area, demonstrating good SERS performance for
153
sensing a congener of PCBs (Fig. 3(A)). In the same manner, a high-density hot spot 3D
154
SERS substrate consisting of polyamide nanofibers was grafted with vertical Ag-nanosheets
155
[32]. Homogeneous nanoscale gaps between neighboring Ag-nanosheets were formed,
156
resulting in a high density of 3D SERS hotspots and demonstrating high SERS activity (Fig.
157
3(B)). Similarly, the 3D SERS substrate can be fabricated via simultaneous assembly of small
158
Ag NPs and large Ag spheres on the side surface and top ends of large scale vertically aligned
159
cone shaped ZnO nanorods [33] (Fig. 3(C)). Another method combined a traditional SERS
160
substrate (Ag NPs) with a magnetomotive enrichment compound (Fe3O4) to detect PCB-77
161
[34]. The authors increased the EM field enhancement of the substrates by modulating the
162
magnetic response of Fe3O4 to dynamically adjust the distances of neighboring Ag NPs. This
163
method created more effective “hot spots” and resulted in an improved SERS detection limit 8
164
for PCBs (Fig. 3(D)). However, the preparation of the sophisticated substrates requires long
165
synthesis times.
166
3.2 Substrates with modified surfaces
167
According to the CM mechanism, the charge transfer between the substrate and analyte
168
PCBs increases the polarizability of the analytes, resulting in a higher degree of Raman
169
transition. The close proximity of target PCBs to the surface of the substrate is regarded as
170
the premise for the phenomenon of CT take place [35]. However, bare Au or Ag NPs
171
experience are difficulty in obtaining SERS signals because of the strong hydrophobicity of
172
PCBs. Thus, significant efforts have been made to modify the surface of the substrates.
173
Modifying the surface with appropriate functional groups has become quite popular and three
174
major types of modification have been developed. (1) Alkanethiols and perfluoroalkanethiol
175
can be coupled with the substrate surface to concentrate analytes and facilitate SERS
176
detection (Fig. 4(A)) [36]. Through Van der Waal interaction with PCBs, the straight chain
177
alkanethiol can be used to modify the substrate surface and capture the hydrophobic PCBs. (2)
178
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are also effective modification agents, as they contain a hydrophobic
179
inner cavity and hydrophilic outer part. They can trap water-insoluble molecules in the cavity
180
to form stable host-guest inclusion complexes. CDs coated on the surface of the core shell
181
nanostructures or nanosheets has demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity of detection.
182
Jency et al. performed early studies using a highly sensitive SERS platform for trace
183
detection of PCBs in agricultural soil based on β-CD modified AuNPs [37]. When
184
contaminated soil was added to the detection system, the binding of the soil contents with
185
β-CD resulted in the aggregation of AuNPs, and a Raman signal of the target PCBs molecules
186
was obtained. A similar method was developed by Xu et al [38]. To increase the efficiency of
187
capturing PCB-77, β-CD was modified on an Ag-nanowire tip array, achieving a limit of
188
detection as low as 1×10-10 M and demonstrating that the sensitivity and selectivity for SERS
189
detection of PCBs can be significantly improved (Fig. 4(B). Hybrid substrates have been
190
fabricated by SH-β-CD via thiol binding. However, the thiolated modifier occupies the active
191
site of the metal surface and interferes with substrate uniformity [39, 40] (Fig. 4(C, D)). In
192
addition, this method is not selective since the other interferents with similar sizes and shapes
193
can be identified by the β-CD. (3) The third type is glutathione (GSH) modification, which
194
can be easily adsorb onto the substrate surface by its thiol groups and the GSH-AuNPs
195
composites have been extensively applied for PCB detection [41].
196
3.3 Indirect measurement 9
197
Besides the modification of the surface of the substrates, the target analytes can also be
198
converted into analogues through addition or substitution reactions for realizing indirect
199
measurements (Fig. 5). Rindzevicius et al. developed an improved procedure for the
200
analytical detection of PCB-77 through modification with a –SH3 group. The vibrational
201
modes of PCB-77 and PCB-77-SCH3 were very similar, but the vibrational intensity of
202
PCB-77-SCH3 was much stronger than that of PCB-77. The experiments showed improved
203
sensitivity towards the detection to PCB-77-SCH3 (10-8 M) over that of PCB-77 (10-5 M) [42].
204
Thus, chemical variations improved the SERS sensitivity, but the selectivity must also be
205
considered. The functional groups interact with the target and other molecules that interfere
206
with the process due to their similar structures and properties.
207
3.4 Substrates with high stability
208
Metal nanoparticle colloids are widely used as SERS substrates due to the hot spots formed
209
between the nanoparticles. However, metal nanoparticle aggregation in colloidal solutions is
210
difficult to control, leading to the random formation of hot spots. When the target molecules
211
exist near the hot spots, the intensities of the enhanced Raman signals were unstable. Other
212
factors influenced by the chemical adsorption such as vibration, charge transfer, and the
213
deformation or distortion of molecules also affect the Raman signals [43]. It is of significant
214
interest to improve substrates from a randomly rough surface to obtain highly ordered
215
nanostructures. Thus, many researches have attempted to control hot spot formation by the
216
modulation of pH [44], temperature [45], and DNA aptamers [46]. Cleaning of the glass
217
sample vials, vortexing time used for sample mixing, and vortexing duration of the enhanced
218
solution significantly influence the aggregation of the metal nanoparticles and affect the
219
reproducibility of the associated analytical method [47]. In addition, the metal nanoparticles
220
decorated on supporting materials, such as graphene sheets, have demonstrated improved
221
stability. Graphene can be used as a platform for molecular decoration and quench
222
fluorescence to provide Raman enhancement. Meanwhile, the sp2 hybridized structure of the
223
carbon atoms constituted a large π bond network, allowing the target molecules to
224
homogeneously adsorb on the surface through π-π interactions, improving the stability of the
225
hybrid substrates [48-50]. This function of graphene has been called the graphene-enhanced
226
Raman scattering (GERS) effect [51]. Shanta et al. described the fabrication of reduced
227
graphene oxide (rGO) assemblies with Ag nanoprisms for improved SERS detection of three
228
tetrachlorobiphenyl isomers from a mixture. The hybrid substrate offered remarkable trace
229
detection ability for PCB-77 [52]. The fabricated periodic nanoprism array on top of the GO 10
230
layers attracted the aromatic rings of the PCBs to the surface via π-π stacking interactions and
231
the captured PCBs showed enhanced SERS signals due the increased charge transfer (Fig.
232
7(A)). The GO structure may also improve the reproducibility of SERS detection. For
233
example, an effective SERS substrate based on GO wrapped flower-like Ag microparticles
234
(Ag @ GO) exhibited higher stability over 50 days of exposure to ambient conditions and
235
demonstrated excellent enrichment and SERS effect for target PCBs molecules [53] (Fig.
236
7(B)). Another method focuses on the fabrication of uniform nanostructures using various
237
advanced nanofabrication techniques [54, 55]. Among these techniques, oblique angle
238
deposition (OAD), which is a physical vapor deposition technique based on a shadowing
239
effect and surface diffusion, has been widely used. The vapor atoms are deposited on a
240
substrate at a large incident angle with respect to the substrate surface normal. Under these
241
conditions, typical Ag nanorod arrays (Ag NRs) can be prepared [56]. By controlling the
242
deposition conditions, including deposition angle, deposition time, growth rate, and
243
temperature, the morphology of the Ag NRs can be easily controlled. In addition, the SERS
244
enhancement factors are mainly dependent on the metal nanorod length [57], incident angle
245
[58], and polarization of the excitation light [59]. Through rigorous control of the above
246
parameters, the nanorod array demonstrated good uniformity and reproducibility [60].
247 248
4. Challenges and perspectives
249
As a sensitive and prominent tool for on-site detection, SERS has been made significant
250
progress towards PCBs detection in the past few years. However, some challenges remain,
251
including the narrow focus of the sensors; the current target PCBs are mainly focused on only
252
PCB-77. Additional PCBs, such as the 12 DL-PCBs and 7 indicator PCBs, should be
253
considered. The current research is still at an early stage and the reported target PCBs are
254
largely based on a pure format without spiking into any matrix or real samples from the field.
255
And the sensitivity of SERS detection for PCBs is relatively low (LOD>10-8 M). Therefore,
256
moreresearch is needed as shown in Fig. 8.
257
4.1 Technology integration
258
SERS is often used as detection tool rather than a separation method. Multiple
259
interferences from structural analogs in the complex matrices exhibit their own characteristic
260
Raman peaks that contribute to SERS spectral patterns. Thus, it is difficult to establish
261
reliable SERS spectral features for target compounds. The integration of effective separation
262
or concentration techniques with further SERS detection are therefore necessary. In past 11
263
studies, many advanced separation techniques have been combined with SERS. However,
264
their applications in PCBs analysis are still very limited. And more research can be conducted
265
from this part.
266
4.1.1 Antibody-based SERS
267
Because of the high selectivity and specificity, antibody-based SERS has attracted
268
increasing attention. Antibodies with a high affinity and specificity for target antigen
269
recognition can be used to capture the target molecules from the complex matrices. The
270
traditional method is based on a sandwich structure consisting of antibodies, target molecules,
271
and tags. The tags are usually composed of the substrates and antibodies called
272
immune-nanoparticles. Typically, a three-step method is used to develop the
273
sandwich-structure. First, the antibodies are immobilized on a metal substrate surface or
274
magnetic beads. Second, the immobilized antibodies specifically capture target molecules
275
(antigens) and finally the antibody-antigen complexes bound with tags are formed into a
276
sandwich structure. To remove the interference originating from the complex matrices, the
277
sandwich structure can be separated via washing or magnetic field application. Compounds
278
that are not bound with the antibodies are eliminated during this step. In the detection step,
279
some substrates exhibit their own characteristic SERS signals, which can be used as an
280
internal standard to decrease the variation of the resulting quantitative calculations [61].
281
Generally, sandwich-structured SERS immunoassays are known as label-free detection, a
282
type of indirect detection. Considering the interaction between target antigens and substrates,
283
Raman reporter molecules are introduced. The Raman reporter is used to characterize the
284
concentration of large proteins composed of repeating units, because the signal intensity of
285
the Raman reporter is correlated to the concentration of the antigen [62]. This detection
286
system can be used for multi-target detection if the corresponding antibodies and different
287
tags can be immobilized or labeled. Magnetic beads used for the separation and enrichment
288
of the target compounds have allowed for remarkable progress in the field of antibody-based
289
SERS detection. In addition to indirect detection, direct immunoassay SERS detection
290
methods have also been developed [63, 64]. These methods usually use antibodies
291
immobilized on the surface of immunomagnetic beads to capture target molecules from the
292
matrices. Elution solutions are used to break the non-covalent bonds between the target
293
molecule and antibodies, which can be subsequently separated and the isolated molecules
294
detected in presence of the SERS substrate. In addition to the classical metallic nanospheres,
295
Raman active nanoparticles including gold nanorods [65], gold nanostars [66], gold 12
296
nanocubes [67], and Au @ Ag NPs [68] have been developed as tags. To improve the stability
297
of the self-aggregating substrates, more stable SERS tags have been fabricated and include
298
core-Raman reporter-shell substrates [69], metal-organic framework (MOF) @ Au tetrapods
299
(Au TPs) immobilized Raman reporter or antibodies [70], and Ag NPs @
300
antibody-functionalized polyethyleneglycol coatings [71]. Some research about the
301
antibody-based SERS used in PCBs detection have been carried out in our research group.
302
We found that the main hurdle remains in preparing antibodies and more research is needed.
303
4.1.2 Aptamer-based SERS
304
In 1990, the first report of an in vitro selection technique was published and used to find
305
specific nucleic acid sequences that bind non-nucleic acid targets with high affinity and
306
specificity [72, 73]. Unlike interactions between antibodies and antigens, aptamer-based
307
sensors operate based on the selectivity between an aptamer and a corresponding aptamer
308
modified with a reporter. Aptamers are oligonucleotides or peptides that bind specific target
309
molecules for the separation, recognition, and enrichment of target analytes. The most
310
common aptamers are composed nucleic acid ligands such as single standard
311
deoxyribonucleic acid (ssDNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA), obtained by repeated rounds of in
312
vitro selection or equivalently, SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential
313
enrichment) [74]. These oligonucleotides can recognize target molecules because of their
314
three-dimensional structures. Once the target PCBs are captured, the ssDNA molecules can
315
fold themselves into three-dimensional formations such as hairpin loops, T-junctions, or
316
G-quadruplexes. For example, an ssDNA oligomer PCB-77 binding aptamer containing the
317
sequence (5’-3’)
318
SH-(CH2)6-GGCGGGGCTACGAAGTAGTGATTTTTTCCGATGGCCCGTG (40 bases)
319
was used for many detections and confirmed to be effective [75-77]. By changing the DNA
320
structure formed upon conjugation with the target molecules, selective and quantitative
321
determination can be realized because of the high affinity and specificity toward the target.
322
Another method involves the change of conformation of the probe when the target gets close
323
to substrate, leading SERS signal changes. The specific recognition of aptamers has the
324
potential to improve the selectivity of SERS detection in complex matrices. A third method is
325
using aptamer-modified metal nanostructures for trace detection of PCBs (Fig. 6). These
326
aptamers are usually composed of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligomers where one end of
327
ssDNA is anchored covalently to an Ag surface via a thiol linker.
328
ssDNA used in aptamer-based SERS is usually selected from a large and random pool of 13
329
nucleotides by the SELEX method, which is time-consuming and exhibits some degree of
330
randomness in the final results. The use of aptamer-based SERS applications remains at an
331
early stage and more research are required.
332
4.1.3 Molecularly imprinted polymer-based SERS
333
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are highly selective and sensitive for separating
334
target analytes from complicated matrices. Typical MIPs include template molecules,
335
functional monomers, and cross-linking reagents. The recognition and capture of target
336
molecules are realized by creating template-shaped cavities in the polymer matrices. The
337
target analytes act as the templates and interact with functional monomers via covalent or
338
non-covalent bonds in solution. The formed covalent complex then inter-act with
339
cross-linking reagents. After removal of the template molecules from the polymers,
340
microcavities with complementary 3D structures conforming to the shape and chemical
341
functionality of the templates are generated. These polymers exhibit excellent capabilities for
342
specifically and sensitively rebinding targets with the similar shapes and microstructures to
343
the original template [78]. MIPs are often referred to as “artificial antibodies” and the target
344
molecule will form a “lock and key” combination with the artificial antibody when reacted
345
with the MIP. The selective MIP method was developed to separate targets from a
346
complicated matrix or for the selective removal of pollutions from environmental matrices
347
[79]. The combination of MIPs with SERS has been validated as a promising platform for the
348
simultaneous separation and determination of trace levels of analytes [80, 81]. For instance,
349
MIP can be doped with AuNPs (AuNPs @ MIPs) via one-pot precipitation polymerization as
350
a template and was successfully applied for chemical sensing [82]. Moreover, novel
351
surface-imprinted core-shell AuNPs were fabricated and applied for the sensitive and
352
selective detection of bisphenol A (BPA) by SERS in real samples. The BPA imprinted MIP
353
layer was fabricated on the AuNPs using a sol-gel process. The formed MIP-AuNPs
354
containing specific recognition sites were used to rebind the BPA molecules [83]. Before
355
MIP-based SERS detection, the selectivity of MIPs for the target compounds and their
356
affinity towards the substrates surface must be evaluated or only weak SERS signals will be
357
obtained.
358
4.1.4 Other techniques combined with SERS
359
Other advanced separation techniques have been used to remove matrix interference and
360
improve SERS detection selectivity [84, 85]. Chemical separation methods such as thin layer
361
chromatography [86, 87, 88], phase separation (liquid-liquid extraction [89], gas-solid 14
362
extraction [90, 91], column chromatography [92, 93]), transmission electron microscopy [94]
363
and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [95] have shown that sample pretreatment can
364
condense the target analytes, reduce interferences, and enhance SERS detection selectivity.
365
And many techniques that have not yet been used in combination with SERS could be
366
attempted.
367
4.2 Expanding the detection range and realizing of the high-throughput detection
368
Most reported methods focused primarily on PCB-77 or PCB-3 detection and expanding
369
the scope of the target PCBs should be addressed. For example, 12 congeners of DL-PCB
370
that show dioxin-like toxicity and 7 indicator PCBs as representative POPs for monitoring
371
should be used in the development of novel methods. TEFs and toxic equivalency quantity
372
(TEQ) values are used by the World Health Organization (WHO), scientists, and regulators as
373
a consistent method to evaluate the toxicities of individual dioxin compounds and their
374
mixtures, respectively. The concentration of one of these PCBs is insufficient for estimating
375
the TEQ level. Therefore, research regarding the capacity of SERS detection should continue.
376
The target scope should be expanded to include the entire family of PCBs. Hence, various
377
SERS-active substrates should be further designed. For example, complex 2D or 3D
378
nanostructures could be used, and the shape and structure of substrates could be adjusted
379
according to the scope requirements.
380
One the other hand is the realizing of high-throughput detection. Novel multi-channel
381
SERS active devices should be developed to enable high-throughput detection. Most reported
382
SERS detection methods for PCBs focused on only a single analyte in a single test. The
383
simultaneous detection integrated into one system is a developing trend. Another way is the
384
use of capturer units modified on the surface of SERS substrates. Currently, some MIP
385
materials have been used for the class specific recognition of structural analogs in complex
386
matrices [96]. The multi-target PCBs with similar chemical structures can be simultaneously
387
captured through MIP. In the case, with the multiple recognition from MIP and the Raman
388
enhancement from SERS substrates, the core-shell nanoparticles consisting of metal core and
389
a MIP shell can be used for the identification of a variety of PCBs. Further, the chemometric
390
resolution methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) can be used to calculate the
391
composition of chemical mixtures [97]. One way is to calculate the adsorption kinetics factor
392
for each component using a standard sample as the reference, with which one could correct
393
the predictions given by PCA [98]. In this situation the determination of multi-target PCBs
394
may be realized. 15
395 396
4.3 Improving the feasibility of SERS substrates
397
The different kinds of substrates for SERS detection of PCBs have been developed.
398
However, the current sensitivity of SERS detection for PCBs is relatively low (LOD>10-8
399
M), which cannot meet the requirements of detection for actual samples. The sensitivity of
400
SERS detection is primarily attributed to the “hot spots” on nano-substrate. These hot spots
401
are generated at the interstitial gaps between metallic nanoparticles. Therefore, increasing the
402
number and location of hot spots can improve the sensitivity of detection. One example is the
403
pre-concentrations of nanoparticles through physical means such as filtration, which can be
404
used to improve the limit of detection. Another example is the coupling of electrokinetic
405
pre-concentration with SERS, which was developed to detect antibiotics and phenols [99,
406
100]. Besides increasing the number of hot spots, alternations of the shape of the
407
nanoparticles can also increase of localized electromagnetic field and increase the likelihood
408
of the contact of target compounds with the hot spots. Nanoparticle with the shape of sea
409
urchin-like [29], and gecko-inspired nano tentacle [31] have been applied. However, their
410
applications in PCBs detection are still very limited, and future studies can be conducted in
411
this way. In addition, during the immobilization of aptamer on the surface of SERS substrate,
412
nonspecific binding of PCBs due to the difficulty of full coverage of the aptamer on the
413
SERS substrate can greatly interfere with the sensitivity of the analysis. The optimization of
414
the surface modification by adding blocker molecules to backfill the empty spaces on the
415
substrates may be the future direction.
416
Meanwhile, the stability and portability of substrates have to be improved further to realize
417
the commercial applications. Traditional colloidal substrates have not been used on a
418
large-scale due to issues concerning their stability and reproducibility. Hence, solid substrates
419
are more suitable for portable on-site detection and fiber-based SERS facilitates the used of
420
solid substrates in field applications [101]. And nanotechnology is often used to fabricate
421
solid metal nanostructures. By adjusting the preparation parameters, different substrates with
422
different morphological characteristics can be fabricated. Higher reproducibility and
423
homogeneity of the substrates will result in precise quantitative detection of PCBs. Therefore,
424
future research efforts should be devoted to developing novel nanotechnologies and exploring
425
the relation between the preparation parameters and structural characteristics. However, the
426
background level of the fiber material may interfere with the detection, limiting the
427
application of the fiber-based SERS. In contrast, paper-based SERS offers a promising 16
428
platform for field detection. Due to its low cost, portability, and feasibility, paper-based SERS
429
platforms have just been developed. Generally, submicron size metal is deposited on filter
430
paper using a spinning device and the paper-based substrate mounted on a holder inside a
431
vacuum chamber, where metal is then allowed to thermally evaporate onto the substrate [102].
432
The deposited metal particles are usually composed of Au NPs [103] or Ag NPs [104].
433
However, the deposited metal particles are exposed on the paper and subject to oxidation,
434
which may decrease their SERS activity. Finally, to improve the feasibility of the SERS
435
detection methods the standardized operation protocols should also be developed.
436
4.4 Reduction of the cost of the procedure
437
Uniform SERS substrates are usually fabricated by relatively new nanotechnology methods.
438
Based on the properties of PCBs molecules, these substrates are often modified with various
439
functional groups for SERS detection. For a wider range of applications, the SERS cost
440
should be reduced by lowering the cost of substrate production and the price of portable
441
Raman spectrometers. Specifically, the source materials of the SERS substrates, optical
442
design, laser devices, charge-coupled devices, and software design will be the improved in
443
the future, leading to significant cost savings.
444 445 446
5. Conclusions The remarkable characteristics of its rapid response, ultra-sensitivity, and simple operation
447
make SERS particularly well suited for PCBs monitoring, especially for on-site detection.
448
The current review presents the rapid advances in the preparation of SERS substrates for the
449
detection of PCBs in the past few years. And some critical technology points have been
450
discussed. However, some challenges still remain. The current target PCBs are mainly
451
focused on only PCB-77. The reported target PCBs are largely based on a pure format rather
452
than the real samples. And the sensitivity of SERS detection for PCBs is relatively low.
453
Future studies should focus on the integration of SERS with other techniques, broadening the
454
detection range, improving the feasibility of SERS substrates, realizing of the
455
high-throughput detection, reduction of the cost of the procedure. Continued efforts and
456
achievements in this field will significantly improve the practical application of SERS for
457
PCBs detection.
458 459 460
Acknowledgment The project was supported in 13th five-year development plan of China by the National 17
461
Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC1600301), the Fundamental Research
462
Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution, Chinese Academy of Agricultural
463
Sciences (NO. 1610072017006) and a special fund for the innovation project for the Chinese
464
Academy of Agricultural Sciences (The innovation team of testing and evaluation for feed
465
quality & safety).
466 467
References
468
[1] F. Wania, D. Mackay, Tracking the Distribution of Persistent Organic Pollutants, Environ. Sci.
469
Technol. 30 (1996) 390-396.
470
[2] M. Van den Berg, L.S. Birnbaum, M. Denison, M. De Vito, W. Feeley, H. Fiedler, et al., The 2005
471
World Health Organisation Re-evaluation of Human and Mammalian Toxic Equivalency Factors for
472
Dioxins and Dioxins-like Compounds. Toxicol. Sci. 93 (2006) 223-241.
473
[3] Commission desicion 277/2012/EC, Off. J. Eur. Commun. L91 1-7.
474
[4] National Food Safety Standard, GB/T 2762, China, 2017.
475
[5] D. Xia, L. Gao, M. Zheng, S. Wang, G. Liu, Simultaneous analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls and
476
polychlorinated
naphthalenes
by
isotope
dilution
comprehensive
two-dimensional
gas
477
chromatography high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta 937 (2016)
478
160-167.
479
[6] G.D. Dam, I.C. Pussente, G. Scholl, G. Eppe, A. Schaechtele, S.V. Leeuwen, The performance of
480
atmospheric pressure gas chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry compared to gas
481
chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry for the analysis of polychlorinated dioxins and
482
polychlorinated biphenyls in food and feed samples, J. Chromatogr. A 1477 (2016) 76-90.
483
[7] D. Geng, P. Kukucka, I.E. Jogsten, Analysis of brominated flame retardants and their derivatives by
484
atmospheric
pressure
chemical
ionization
using gas chromatography coupled
485
quadrupole mass spectrometry, Talanta 162 (2016) 618-624.
to tandem
486
[8] L. Ching, B. Eric, L. James, Z. Wei, Optimized efficiency of mapping a site contaminated with
487
dioxins by immunoassay compared to gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry, Anal.
488
Bioanal. Chem. 408 (2016) 1095-1105.
489
[9] D. Crump, A. Farhat, S. Chiu, K.L. Williams, S.P. Jones, V.S. Langlois, Use of a Novel
490
Double-Crested Cormorant ToxChip PCR Array and the EROD Assay to Determine Effects of
491
Environmental Contaminants in Primary Hepatocytes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (2016) 3265-3274.
492
[10] H. Kojima, S. Takeuchi, M. Iida, S.F. Nakayama, T. Shiozaki, A sensitive, rapid, and simple
493
DR-EcoScreen bioassay for the determination of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in environmental
494
and food samples, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (2018) 7101-7112. 18
495
[11] I. Ahmad, J.Y. Weng, A.J. Stromberg, J.Z. Hilt, T.D. Dziubla, Fluorescence based detection of
496
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water using hydrophobic interactions, Analyst 144 (2019):
497
677-684.
498
[12] M. Mascini, A. Macagnano, G. Scortichini, M.D. Carlo, G. Diletti, A.D. Amico, C.D. Natele, D.
499
Compagnone, Biomimetic sensors for dioxins detection in food samples, Sens. Actuators B Chem.
500
111 (2005) 376-384.
501
[13] G. Yang, H. Zhuang, H. Chen, X. Ping, B. Du, A gold nanoparticle based immunosorbent bio-barcode
502
assay combined with real-time immuno-PCR for the detection of polychlorinated biphenyls, Sens.
503
Actuators B Chem. 214 (2015) 152-158.
504 505
[14] X. Zheng, H. Li, F. Xia, D. Tian, X. Hua, X. Qiao, C. Zhou, An electrochemical sensor for ultrasensitive determination the polychlorinated biphenyls, Electrochimica Acta 194 (2016) 413-421.
506
[15] C.Y. Zhang, R. Hao, Y.Z. Fu, H.J. Zhang, S. Moeendarbari, C.S. Peckering, Y.W. Hao, Y.Q. Liu,
507
Graphene oxide-wrapped flower-like sliver particles for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and
508
their applications in polychlorinated biphenyls detection, Appl. Surf. Sci. 400 (2017) 49-56.
509 510 511 512 513 514
[16] G.B. Adam, M.R. Stephen, M.W. Ian, Vertical-flow paper SERS system for therapeutic drug monitoring of flucytosine in serum, Ana. Chim. Acta. 949 (2017) 59-66. [17] Y.F. Jiang, D.W. Sun, H.B. Pu, Q.Y. Wei, Ultrasensitive analysis of kanamycin residue in milk by SERS-based aptasensor, Talanta 197 (2019) 151-158. [18] J.J. Du, C.Y. Jing, One-step fabrication of dopamine-inspired Au for SERS sensing of Cd2+ and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Anal. Chim. Acta 1062 (2019) 131-139.
515
[19] J. Cheng, X.O. Su, C.Q. Han, S. Wang, P.L. Wang, S. Zhang, J.C. Xie, Ultrasensitive detection of
516
salbutamol in animal urine by immunomagnetic bead treatment couping with surface-enhanced
517
Raman spectroscopy, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 255 (2018) 2329-2338.
518
[20] Y.F. Jiang, D.W. Sun, H.B. Pu, Q.Y. Wei, Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): A novel
519
reliable technique for rapid detection of common harmful chemical residues, Trends Food Sci. Tech.
520
75 (2018) 10-22.
521 522
[21] S. Pang, T.X. Yang, L.L. He, Review of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic (SERS) detection of synthetic chemical pesticides, Trend. Anal. Chem. 85 (2016) 73-82.
523
[22] T. Yaseen, H.B. Pu, D.W. Sun, Functionalization techniques for improving SERS substrates and their
524
applications in food safety evaluation: A review of recent research trends, Trends Food Sci. Tech. 72
525
(2018) 162-174.
526 527 528
[23] M. Fleischmann, P.J. Hendra, A.J. McQuillan, Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode, Chem. Phys. Lett. 26 (1974) 163-166. [24] M. Moskovits, Surface enhanced spectroscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985) 783-826. 19
529
[25] E.C.L. Ru, E. Blackie, M. Meyer, P.G. Etchegoin, Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Enhancement
530 531
Factors: A comprehensive study, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 13794-13803. [26] Y.S. Yamamoto, T. Itoh, Why and how do the shapes of surface-enhanced Ramsn scattering spectra
532
change? Recent progress from mechanistic studies, J. Raman Spectrosc. 47 (2016) 78-88.
533
[27] H.Y. Liang, Z.P. Li, W.Z. Wang, Y.S. Wu, H.X. Xu, Highly surface-roughened “flower-like” silver
534
nanoparticles for extremely sensitive substrates of surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Adv. Mater. 21
535
(2009) 4614-4618.
536
[28] B. Zhang, P. Xu, X.M. Xie, H. Wei, Z.P. Li, N.H. Mack, X.J. Han, H.X. Xu, H.L. Wang, Acid-directed
537
synthesis of SERS-active hierarchical assemblies of silver nanostructures, J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011)
538
2495-2501.
539
[29] X.S. Wang, D.P. Yang, P. Huang, M. Li, D. Chen, D.X. Cui, Hierarchically assembled Au
540
microspheres and sea urchin-like architectures: formation mechanism and SERS study, Nanoscale 24
541
(2012) 7766-7772.
542
[30] Z.B. Li, G.W. Meng, Q. Huang, X.Y. Hu, X. He, H.B. Tang, Z.W. Wang, F.D. Li, Ag
543
nanoparticles-grafted PAN-nanohump array films with 3D high-density hot spots as flexible and
544
reliable SERS substrates, Small 40 (2015) 5452-5459.
545
[31] P. Wang, L. Wu, Z.C. Lu, Q. Li, W.M. Yin, F. Ding, H.Y. Han, Gecko-inspired nanotentacle
546
surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy substrate for sampling and reliable detection of pesticide
547
residues in fruits and vegetables, Anal. Chem. 89 (2017) 2424-2431.
548
[32]
Y. Qian, G.W. Meng, Q. Huang, C.H. Zhu, Z.L. Huang, K.X. Sun, B. Chen, Flexible membranes of
549
Ag-nanosheet-grafted polyamide-nanofibers as effective 3D SERS substrates, Nanoscale 6 (2014)
550
4781-4788.
551
[33]
H.B. Tang, G.W. Meng, Q. Huang, Z. Zhang, Z.L. Huang, C.H. Zhu, Arrays of cone-shaped ZnO
552
nanorods decorated with Ag nanoparticles as 3D surface-enhanced raman scattering substrates for
553
rapid detection of trace polychlorinated biphenyls, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 (2012) 218-224.
554
[34]
Z.Y. Bao, X. Liu, Y. Chen, Y.C. Wu, H.L.W. Chan, J.Y. Dai, D.Y. Lei, Quantitative SERS detection
555
of low-concentration aromatic polychlorinated biphenyl-77 and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, J. Hazard. Mater.
556
280 (2014) 706-712.
557
[35] K. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Wu, Y. Liu, D. Shi, B. Liu, On-demand quantitative SERS bioassays
558 559
facilitated by surface-tethered ratiometric probes, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 8089-8093. [36] K.C. Bantz, C.L. Haynes, Surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection and discrimination of
560 561 562
polychlorinated biphenyls, Vib. Spectrosc. 50 (2009) 29-35. [37]
D.A. Jency, M. Umadevi, G.V. Sathe, SERS detection of polychlorinated biphenyls using β-cyclodextrin functionalized gold nanoparticles on agriculture land soil, J. Raman Spectrosc. 46 20
563 564
(2015) 377-383. [38]
W. Xu, G.W. Meng, Q. Huang, X.Y. Hu, Z.L. Huang, H.B. Tang, J.X. Zhang, Large-scale uniform
565
Ag-NW tip array with enriched sub-10-nm gaps as SERS substrates of rapid determination of trace
566
PCB77, Appl. Surf. Sci. 271 (2013) 125-130.
567
[39] Y.L. Lu, G.H. Yao, K.X. Sun, Q. Huang, β-Cyclodextrin coated SiO2@Au@Ag core-shell
568
nanoparticles for SERS detection of PCBs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 21149-21157.
569
[40] C. Zhu, G.W. Meng, Q. Huang, Z.B. Li, Z.L. Huang, M.L. Wang, J.P. Yuan, Large-scale
570
well-separated Ag assembled micro-hemispheres modified with HS-β-CD as effective SERS
571
substrates for trace detection of PCBs, J. Mater Chem. 22 (2012) 2271-2278.
572
[41]
J.D. Arocikia, R. Parimaladevi, S.G. Vasant, M. Umadevi, Glutathione functionalized gold
573
nanoparticles as efficient surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate for poly chlorinated biphenyl
574
detection, J. Clust. Sci. 29 (2018) 281-287.
575
[42] T. Rindzevicius, J. Barten, M. Vorobiev, M.S. Schmidt, J.J. Castillo, A. Boisen, Detection of
576
surface-linked polychlorinated biphenyls using surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy, Vib.
577
Spectrosc. 90 (2017) 1-6.
578
[43] J.F. Li, Y.F. Huang, Y. Ding, Z.L. Yang, S.B. Li, Z X.S. hou, F.R. Fan, W. Zhang, Z.Y. Zhou, D.Y. Wu,
579
B. Ren, Z.L. Wang, Z.Q. Tian, Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced raman spectroscopy, Nature 464
580
(2010) 392-395.
581
[44] T.B. Patricia, J.B. Niklaas, R.L. Laura, P.J. Jorge, M.L.M. Luis, H. Pablo, Reversible assembly of
582
metal nanoparticles induced by penicillamine. Dynamic formation of SERS hot spots, J. Mater. Chem.
583
21 (2011) 16880-16887.
584
[45] A. Bonyár, I. Csarnovics, M. Veres, L. Himics, A. Csik, J. Kámán, L. Balázs, S. Kökényesi,
585
Investigation of the performance of thermally generated gold nanoislands for LSPR and SERS
586
applications, Sens. Actuators B 255 (2018) 433-439.
587 588
[46] N.H. King, S.J. Lee, M. Moskovits, Reversible tuning of SERS hot spots with aptamers, Adv. Mater. 23 (2011) 4152-4156.
589
[47] J. Cheng, X.O. Su, C.Q. Han, S. Wang, P.L. Wang, S. Zhang, J.C. Xie, Ultrasensitive detection of
590
salbutamol in animal urine by immunomagnetic bead treatment couping with surface-enhanced
591
Raman spectroscopy, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 255 (2018) 2329-2338.
592 593
[48] C.T. Zhang, K. Lin, Y.Q. Huang, J.H. Zhang, Graphene-Ag hybrids on laser-textured Si surface for SERS detection, Sensor 17 (2017) 1462.
594
[49] J. Guo, S.C. Xu, X.Y. Liu, Z. Li, L.T. Hu, Z. Li, P.X. Chen, Y. Ma, S.Z. Jiang, T.Y. Ning, Graphene
595
oxide-Ag nanoparticles-pyramidal silicon hybrid system for homogeneous, long-term stable and
596
sensitive SERS activity, Appl. Surf. Sci. 396 (2017) 1130-1137. 21
597 598 599 600 601 602
[50] H.H. Tian, N. Zhang, L.M. Tong, J. Zhang, In situ quantitative graphene-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Small Methods 1 (2017) 1700126. [51] W.G. Xu, N.N. Mao, J. Zhang, Graphene: A platform for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Small 8 (2013) 1206-1224. [52] P.V. Shanta, Q. Cheng, Graphene oxide nanoprims for sensitive detection of environmentally important aromatic compounds with SERS, ACS Sensors 1 (2017) 817-827.
603
[53] C.Y. Zhang, R. Hao, Y.Z. Fu, H.J. Zhang, S. Moeendarbari, C.S. Peckering, Y.W. Hao, Y.Q. Liu,
604
Graphene oxide-wrapped flower-like sliver particles for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and
605
their applications in polychlorinated biphenyls detection, Appl. Surf. Sci. 400 (2017) 49-56.
606 607
[54] B.A. Heman, K. Jan, K. Andrzej, Modification of surfaces of silver nanoparticles for controlled deposition of silicon, manganese, and titanium dioxides, Appl. Surf. Sci. 427 (2018) 334-339.
608
[55] C.Q. Han, Y. Yao, W. Wang, L.L. Qu, L. Bradley, S.L. Sun, Y.P. Zhao, Rapid and sensitive detection
609
of sodium saccharin in soft drinks by silver nanorod array SERS substrates, Sens. Actuators B 251
610
(2017) 272-279.
611 612
[56] Y. He, Y.P. Zhao, Advanced multi-component nanostructures designed by dynamic shadowing growth, Nanoscale 3 (2011) 2361-2375.
613
[57] J.D. Driskell, S. Shanmukh, Y.J. Liu, S.B. Chaney, X.J. Tang, Y.P. Zhao, R.A. Dluhy, The Use of
614
Aligned Silver Nanorod Arrays Prepared by Oblique Angle Deposition as Surface Enhanced Raman
615
Scattering Substrates, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 895-901.
616 617
[58] Y.J. Liu, J.G. Fan, Y.P. Zhao, S. Shanmukh, R.A. Dluhy, Angle dependent surface enhanced Raman scattering obtained from a Ag nanorod array substrate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 173134.
618
[59] Y.P. Zhao, S.B. Chaney, S. Shanmukh, R.A. Dluhy, Polarized Surface Enhanced Raman and
619
Absorbance Spectra of Aligned Silver Nanorod Arrays, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 3153-3157.
620
[60] A. Barranco, A. Borras, A.R. Gonzalez-Elipe, A. Palmero, Perspectives on oblique angle deposition of
621
thin films: from fundamentals to devices, Progress in materials science 76 (2016) 59-153.
622
[61] Y. Wang, M. Salehi, M. Schütz, S. Schlücker, Femtogram detection of cytokines in a direct dot-blot
623
assay using SERS microspectroscopy and hydrophilically stabilized Au-Ag nanoshells, Chem.
624
Commun. 50 (2014) 2711-2714.
625 626
[62] S. Laing, K. Gracie, K. Faulds, Multiplex in vitro detection using SERS, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 1901-1918.
627
[63] J. Cheng, X.O. Su, S. Wang, Y.P. Zhao, Highly sensitive detection of clenbuterol in animal urine using
628
immunomagnetic bead treatment and surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)
629
32637.
22
630
[64] A. Lopez, F. Lovato, S.H. Oh, Y.H. Lai, S. Filbrun, E.A. Driskell, J.D. Driskell, SERS immunoassay
631
based on the capture and concentration of antigen-assembled gold nanoparticles, Talanta 146 (2016)
632
388-393.
633
[65] M.E. Pekdemir, D. Ertürkan, H. Külah, I.H. Boyacı, C. Özgen, U. Tamer, Ultrasensitive and selective
634
homogeneous sandwich immunoassay detection by Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS),
635
Analyst 137 (2012) 4834-4840.
636
[66] Y.W. Pei, Z.Y. Wang, S.F. Zong, Y.P. Cui, Highly sensitive SERS-based immunoassay with
637
simultaneous utilization of self-assembled substrates of gld nanostars and aggregates of gold
638
nanostars, J. Mater. Chem. B 1 (2013) 3992-3998.
639
[67] A. Phranot, R. Patcharee, I. Wishulada, P. Thantrira, I. Numpon, Synthesis, characterization, drug
640
release and transdentinal delivery studies of magnetic nanocubes coated with biodegradable poly (2-
641
(dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate), J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 427 (2017) 235-240.
642
[68] Y. Xie, H.F. Chang, K. Zhao, J.G. Li, H. Yang, L.Y. Mei, S.M. Xu, A.P. Deng, A novel
643
immunochromatographic assay (ICA) based on surface-enhaned Raman scattering for the sensitive
644
and quantitative determination of clenbuterol, Anal. Methods 7 (2015) 513-520.
645
[69] Y.W. Chen, T.Y. Liu, P.J. Chen, P.H. Chang, S.Y. Chen, A High-Sensitivity and Low-Power
646
Theranostic Nanosystem for Cell SERS Imaging and Selectively Photothermal Therapy Using
647
Anti-EGFR-Conjugated Reduced Graphene Oxide/Mesoporous Silica/AuNPs Nanosheets, Small 12
648
(2016) 1458-1468.
649
[70] Y. He, Y. Wang, X. Yang, S.B. Xie, R. Yuan, Y.Q. Chai, Metal organic frameworks combing CoFe2O4
650
magnetic nanoparticles as highly efficient SERS sensing platform for ultrasensitive detection of
651
N-Terninal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 7683-7690.
652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659
[71] N. Guarrotxena, G.C. Bazan, Antibody-functionalized SERS tags with improved sensitivity, Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 8784-8786. [72] A.D. Ellington, J.W. Szostak, In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands, Nature 346 (1990) 818-822. [73] C. Tuerk, L. Gold, Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase, Science 249 (1990) 505-510. [74] M. Famulok, J.W. Szostak, In Vitro Selection of Specific Ligand-binding Nucleic Acids, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 31 (2010) 979-988.
660
[75] C.C. Fu, Y. Wang, G. Chen, L.Y. Yang, S.P. Xu, W.Q. Xu, Aptamer-based surface-enhanced Raman
661
scattering-Microfluidic sensor for sensitive and selective polychlorinated biphenyls detection, Anal.
662
Chem. 87 (2015) 9555-9558.
663
[76] K. Sun, Q. Huang, G.W. Meng, Y.L. Lu, Highly sensitive selective surface enhanced raman 23
664
spectroscopy label detection of 3,3’,4,4’-tetrachlorobiphenyl using DNA aptamer-modified
665
Ag-nanorod arrays, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 5723-5728.
666
[77]
based on DNA aptamer modified SiO2@Au core/shell nanoparticles, Analyst 139 (2014) 3083-3087.
667 668
Y.L. Lu, Q. Huang, G.W. Meng, L.J. Wu, J.J. Zhang, Label-free selective SERS detection of PCB-77
[78] R.J. Gui, H. Jin, H.J.Guo, Z.H. Wang, Recent advances and future prospects in molecularly imprinted
669
polymers-based electrochemical biosensors, Biosens. Bioelectron. 100 (2018) 56-70.
670
[79] D.S. Mkhize, H. Nyoni, L.P. Quinn, B.B. Mamba, T.A.M. Msagati, Molecularly imprinted
671
membranes (MIMs) for selective removal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in environmental
672
waters: fabrication and characterization, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 24 (2017) 11694-11707.
673
[80] H. Li, X. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Jiang, Y. Qiao, M. Wei, Y. Yan, C. Li, A high-performance
674
SERS-imprinted sensor doped with silver particles of different surface morphologies for selective
675
detection of pyrethroids in rivers, Mew J. Chem. 41 (2017) 14342-14350.
676
[81] Y. Xie, M. Zhao, Q. Hu, Y. Cheng, Y. Guo, H. Qian, W. Yao, Selective detection of chloramphenicol
677
in milk based on molecularly imprinted polymer surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic nanosensor,
678
J. Raman. Spectrosc. 48 (2017) 204-210.
679
[82] T. Shahar, T. Sicron, D. Mandler, Nanosphere molecularly imprinted polymers doped with gold
680
nanoparticles for high selectivity molecular sensors, Nano Res. 10 (2017) 1056-1063.
681
[83] J.Q. Xue, D.W. Li, L.L. Qu, Y.T. Long, Surface-imprinted core-shell Au nanoparticles for selective
682
detection of bisphenol A based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Anal. Chim. Acta 777 (2013)
683
57-62.
684
[84] Y. Zhang, S.J. Zhao, J.K. Zheng, L.L. He, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined
685
techniques for high-performance detection and characterization, Trend. Anal. Chem. 90 (2017) 1-13.
686
[85] W. Liao, X.N. Lu, Determination of chemical hazards in foods using surface-enhanced Raman
687
spectroscopy coupled with advanced separation techniques, Trends Food Sci. Tech. 54 (2016)
688
103-113.
689
[86] F. Fang, Y. Qi, F. Lu, L. Yang, Highly sensitive on-site detection of drugs adulterated in botanical
690
dietary supplements using thin layer chromatography combined with dynamic surface enhanced
691
Raman spectroscopy, Talanta 146 (2016) 351-357.
692
[87] Y.C. Ho, W.W.Y. Lee, S.E.J. Bell, Investigation of the chemical origin and evidential value of
693 694
differences in the SERS spectra of blue gel inks, Analyst 141 (2016) 5152-5158. [88]
Q. Zhu, Y. Zhao, Y. Cao, Y. Chai, F. Lu, Rapid on-site TLC-SERS detection of four antidiabetes
695
drugs used as adulterants in botanical dietary supplements. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406 (2014) 1877.
696
[89] M. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Shi, Z. Liu, J. Zhan, Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy hyphenated with
697
surface microextraction for in-situ detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on food contact 24
698
materials, Talanta 158 (2016) 322-329.
699
[90] Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, F. Pan, J. Liu, K. Wang, C. Zhang, S. Cheng, L. Lu, W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. Zhi,
700
Q. Zhang, G. Alfranca, J.M. De la Fuente, D. Chen, D. Cui, Breath analysis based on
701
surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor distinguishes early and advanced gastric cancer patients
702
from healthy persons, ACS Nano 10 (2016) 8169-8179.
703
[91] B. Li, Y. Shi, J. Cui, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Zhan, Au-coated ZnO nanorods on stainless steel fiber for
704
self-cleaning solid phase microextraction-surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Anal. Chim. Acta
705
923 (2016) 66-73.
706
[92] W. Wang, M. Xu, Q. Guo, Y. Yuan, R. Gu, J. Yao, Rapid separation and on-line detection by coupling
707
high performance liquid chromatography with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, RSC Adv. 5
708
(2015) 47640-47646.
709
[93] C. Zaffino, G.D. Bedini, G. Mazzola, V. Guglielmi, S. Bruni, Online coupling of high-performance
710
liquid chromatography with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the identification of historical
711
dyes, J. Raman Spectrosc. 47 (2016) 607-615.
712
[94] E. Cepeda-Pérez, T. López-Luke, G. Plascencia-Villa, L. Perez-Mayen, A. Ceja-Fdez, A. Ponce, et al.
713
SERS and integrative imaging upon internalization of quantum dots into human oral epithelial cells,
714
Journal of Biophotonics, 9 (2016) 683–693.
715 716
[95] A. Convertino, V. Mussi, L. Maiolo, Disordered array of Au covered Silicon nanowires for SERS biosensing combined with electrochemical detection. Scientific Reports 6 (2016) 25099.
717
[96] C. Dougal, M.C. Adam, The use of effective fragment potentials in the design and synthesis of
718
molecularly imprinted polymers for the group recognition of PCBs. Org. Biomol. Chem. 11(2013)
719
4646-4656.
720
[97] H. Luo, Y. Huang, K. Lai, B.A. Rasco, Y. Fan, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy coupled with
721
gold nanoparticles for rapid detection of phosmet and thiabendazole residues in apples. Food control
722
68(2016) 229-235.
723 724
[98] S. Zou, M. Hou, J. Li, Z. Zhang, Semi-quantitative analysis of multiple chemical mixtures in solution at trace level by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Scientific Reports 7(2017) 6186.
725
[99] Y.T. Li, L.L. Qu, D.W. Li, Q.X. Song, F. Fathi, Y.T. Long, Rapid and sensitive in-situ detection of
726
polar antibiotics in water using a disposable Ag-graphene sensor based on electrophoretic
727
preconcentration and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Biosens. Bioelectron. 43 (2013) 94-100.
728
[100] D. Li, D.W. Li, J.S. Fossey, Y.T. Long, Portable surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor for rapid
729
detection of aniline and phenol derivatives by on-site electrostatic preconcentration, Anal. Chem. 82
730
(2010) 9299-9305.
731
[101] X. Yang, C. Gu, F. Qian, Y. Li, J.Z. Zhang, Highly sensitive detection of proteins and bacteria in 25
732
aqueous solution using surface-enhanced Raman scattering and optical fibers, Anal. Chem. 83 (2011)
733
5888-5894.
734 735 736 737 738 739
[102] T. Vodinh, M.Y.K. Hiromoto, G.M. Gegun, R.L. Moody, Surface-enhanced Raman spectrometry for trace organic analysis, Anal. Chem. 56 (1984) 1667-1670. [103] S.W. Hu, S. Qiao, J.B. Pan, B. Kang, J.J. Xu, H.Y. Chen, A paper-based SERS test strip for quantitative detection of Mucin-1 in whole blood, Talanta 179 (2018) 9-14. [104] W.X. Wei, Q.L. Huang, Rapid fabrication of silver nanoparticle-coated filter paper as SERS substrate for low-abundance molecules detection, Spectrochim. Acta. A 179 (2017) 211-215.
740
26
741
Figure captions
742
Fig.1 Illustration of SERS mechanism
743
Fig.2 SEM pictures of (a) “flower”-like Ag nanoparticles [27]; (b, c) Ag nanoparticles
744 745
hierarchical structures [28]; (d) “sea urchin”-like Au micro-particles [29]; (e) Ag nanoparticles decorated on nanohump [30]; (f) gecko-inspired nano tentacle [31].
746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757
Fig.3 (A) The fabrication of Ag NPs @ PAN nanohump arrays substrate via Ag sputtering method [30]; (B) Schematic for the fabrication of Ag-nanosheet-grafted PA-nanofiber membranes. Step Ⅰ: a PA-nanofiber membrane is synthesized by electrospinning; Step Ⅰ: Au-nanoparticles are assembled onto the nanofiber as seeds for the growth of Ag-nanosheets; Step Ⅰ: Ag-nanosheets are electrodeposited on the PA nanofibers [32]; (C) Schematic image of the fabrication of an array of ZnO-NRs decorated with Ag NPs (on the NRs side surface) and Ag spheres (on the NRs tops) on Si wafers. There are three kinds of “gaps” between the Ag NPs to form 3D “hot spots” as indicated as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd schematically. “1st” stands for the gaps between the Ag NPs located on the side surface of the same NR; “2nd” stands for the gaps between the two Ag NPs located on the side surface of two neighboring NRs; and “3rd” stands for the gaps between the two large Ag spheres located on the tops of two neighboring NRs [33]; (D) TEM of Ag NPs decorated on Fe3O4 complex and the SERS spectra of PCB-77 with different concentrations [34].
758
Fig.4 (A) The formation of alkanethiol binding layer on SERS substrates for PCBs detection [36]; (B)
759
β-cyclodextrin functionalized gold nanoparticles for the determination of PCB-77 [38]; (C) Schematic
760
representation of β-CD assisted synthesis of uniform SiO2 @ Au @ Ag @ CD NPs for detection of
761
PCB-3, PCB-29, and PCB-77. First, silica NPs are synthesized by the StÖber method, and then Au
762
seeds are conjugated to the silica surface, followed by the formation of the Au shell, and finally, the
763
Ag shell and β-CD capping are achieved simultaneously by using β-CD under alkaline conditions [39].
764
(D) Schematic diagram for the formation of the well separated Ag nanosheet-assembled
765
micro-hemispheres on an ITO substrate. (1) Ag atoms form sparse nuclei on the sparsely distributed
766
and raised tips of the ITO substrate. (2) Newly formed Ag clusters (or particles) attach onto the
767
pre-existing Ag nuclei. (3) Ag particles form nanparticles-assembled hemispheres by oriented
768
attachment. (4) The nanoparticles in the micro-hemispheres fuse together in parallel planes to form
769
rough nanosheets by Ostwald ripening and thus well-separated nanosheet-assembled
770
micro-hemispheres are achieved. (5) The modification of HS-β-CD on the surface of bare Ag
771
nanosheet-assembled micro-hemispheres for PCB-77 detection [40].
772 773 774 775 776 777 778
Fig.5 Schematic comparison of the SERS-based PCB detection principles utilizing ~500nm tall gold-capped Si nanopillars on 200nm thick gold film. Average pillar head dimensions are ~300nm and ~100nm in height and width, respectively. (a) Solvent drying forms nanopillar clusters and encapsulates standard PCB-77; (b) -SCH3 modified PC077 molecules; (c) The SEM images illustrate the clustering step of gold-capped silicon nanopillars; (d) SERS spectra of PCB-77 at concentrations of 5 ×10-3~5 × 10-6 M. (e) SERS spectra of PCB-77-SCH3 at concentrations of 5 ×10-3~5 × 10-8 M [42].
779
Fig.6 (A) SERS measurement of PCB-77 with aptamer capturing in a microfluidic device [75]; (B) 27
780
The label detection of PCB-77 using DNA aptamer-modified Ag-nanorod arrays [76]; (C) Label-free
781
selective SERS detection of PCB-77 based on DNA aptamer modified SiO2@Au core/shell
782
nanoparticles [77].
783 784 785
Fig.7 (A) Fabrication of Ag-nanoprisms on top of GO covered glass slides and the SERS spectra of PCB-47, PCB-52 and PCB-77 [52]; (B) The SERS substrates based on GO wrapped flower-like Ag microparticles (Ag@GO) for the determination of PCB-3 and PCB-77 [53]
786
Fig.8 The trends of SERS for PCBs detection.
787
28
788
Figures
789
Fig.1
790 791
29
792
Fig.2
793 794
30
795
Fig.3
796 797
31
798
Fig.4
799 800
32
801
Fig.5
802 803
33
804
Fig.6
805 806
34
807
Fig.7
808 809
35
810
Fig.8
811 812
36
Highlights
The SERS technical points to the detection of PCBs have been discussed. The rapid advances of SERS substrates preparation for PCBs detection have been presented. The perspectives and the development trends are proposed.
AUTHOR CV Jie Cheng is an associate professor of Agro-products safety in the Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technology for Agro-products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. He received his PhD degree in food safety at the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. His research focuses on the synthesis and self-assembly of nanomaterials, and rapid screening methods based on SERS, mainly in the food safety area.
Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: