RESEARCH NEWS
Moore’s law for organic TFTs ELECTRONIC MATERIALS Improving the performance of transistors by downscaling is much less straightforward with organic thin-film transistors (TFTs) because it has to be balanced by maintaining compatibility with large-area flexible electronics manufacturing. Graphical printing processes have poor resolution compared with the lithographic methods used for Si integrated circuits. Now scientists from the University of Cambridge, UK, have used a self-aligned printing technique to downscale printed TFTs [Noh et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. (2007) doi:10.1038/ nnano.2007.365]. The features that control transistor switching speed – channel length, gate dielectric thickness, and gate to source/drain overlap – can be shrunk from tens of microns down to 100–400 nm. “Our work shows that in this way it is possible to realize printed TFTs that can, in principle, operate at megahertz frequencies,” says Henning Sirringhaus. Switching speeds are improved by several orders of magnitude, devices can operate below 5 V, and carrier mobilities are ~0.1–0.2 cm2V–1s–1. “This is the best performance reported to date for inkjet printed polymer transistors,” the researchers claim. The self-aligned gate process developed by the group is key. The surface of the first printed electrode is modified with a hydrophobic monolayer that repels the ink of the second electrode, resulting in a small but controlled gap between the two electrodes. When a photosensitive dielectric on the top side is illuminated though the back of the substrate, the two electrodes, the source and drain, act as a shadow mask for positioning the gate electrode. “The method they are using is simple and can be easily scaled up,” says Zhenan Bao from Stanford University.
Pauline Rigby
Conducting in the graphene orchestra ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Graphene’s unique band structure has motivated much research toward a unified theory of graphene carrier transport. One of the outstanding mysteries, however, is graphene’s residual conductivity. With a report by researchers at the University of Maryland, a fuller theoretical picture shows that the concentration of unavoidable impurities explains graphene’s transport properties [Adam et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (2007) 104, 18392]. Until now, the theory was that near the Dirac point (a singularity in the band structure where the density of states vanishes and carriers are massless Dirac fermions) graphene’s charge carrier transport is ballistic and the conductivity minimum is a fixed quantity. But the new research shows unequivocally that the conductivity is a function of the concentration of impurities in the sample. “Since we knew that the exfoliation technique used to obtain graphene involves extracting graphene onto a SiO2 substrate and that the high density mobility is limited by dirt in the substrate and not in the graphene itself, we wanted to see if this would also explain the residual minimum conductivity,” says Shaffique Adam. “The basic idea is that the disorder induces carriers that in turn screen the impurities making them appear weaker.” Their theoretical framework to determine the residual density of carriers quantitatively solves the mystery of the residual conductivity.
A schematic of the model where charged impurities in the SiO2 substrate give rise to puddles of electrons and holes whose carrier density needs to be calculated self-consistently. The researchers demonstrate that this residual density is responsible for the minimum conductivity. Also shown is a comparison between theory and experiment for a representative sample, where the only fitting parameter is the impurity concentration.
The work shows that the mobility below room temperature in current samples is set entirely by disorder in the substrate. Thus, changing the substrate or reducing impurities is the clear road to higher mobility – a promising idea for future graphene-based transistors. “By going to cleaner samples or suspended graphene,” says Adam, “we anticipate a whole host of new interesting physics that is the subject of our current research.” D. Jason Palmer
Surface layers allow accurate doping ELECTRONIC MATERIALS A novel process for implanting dopant atoms in semiconductor materials with nanometer precision could be an enabling technology for the continued miniaturization of Si microelectronics [Ho et al., Nat. Mater. (2007) doi:10.1038/ nmat2058]. As transistors shrink in size, it becomes increasingly important to control their doping reliably, particularly for ultrashallow source and drain regions. Ion implantation and solid source diffusion are the standard methods for implanting dopants in semiconductors, but at small scales these methods are not sufficiently precise to put dopants exactly where they are needed. In addition, ion implantation induces significant crystal damage. Now a team of electrical engineers led by Ali Javey at the University of California, Berkeley, has developed an alternative doping method based on surface chemistry. “We have developed a novel and generic approach for controlled nanoscale doping of semiconductors by utilizing the rich surface chemistry of crystalline materials combined with a
self-limiting monolayer formation reaction,” explains Javey. They use dopant-containing reagent molecules that form well-ordered, covalently-bonded thin films on the surface of Si. The molecules are then driven into the Si by rapidly annealing the samples at high temperature. By controlling the heat treatment conditions, it is possible to control the depth to which the dopants penetrate. “The process is highly generic for both planar and nonplanar (such as nanowire) structures with the dopant dose and profile being well controlled through molecular precursor design and the thermal annealing conditions,” says Javey. The new approach addresses a critical need for a robust nanoscale doping technique that can avoid the limitations of conventional methods, claim the researchers. “The method was demonstrated for standard Si substrates as well as Si-on-insulator and bottom-up nanowire materials, and can be readily implemented to other types of semiconductor substrate with the appropriate surface chemistry,” says Javey.
Pauline Rigby
JAN-FEB 2008 | VOLUME 11 | NUMBER 1-2
9