Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET)

Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET)

Accepted Manuscript Title: Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) Autho...

661KB Sizes 1 Downloads 68 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) Author: P.H. Jones, S. Dawson, R.M. Gaskell, K.P. Coyne, Á. Tierney, C. Setzkorn, A.D. Radford, P-J.M. Noble PII: DOI: Reference:

S1090-0233(14)00241-X http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.044 YTVJL 4180

To appear in:

The Veterinary Journal

Accepted date:

31-5-2014

Please cite this article as: P.H. Jones, S. Dawson, R.M. Gaskell, K.P. Coyne, Á. Tierney, C. Setzkorn, A.D. Radford, P-J.M. Noble, Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET), The Veterinary Journal (2014), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.044. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Surveillance of diarrhoea in small animal practice through the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) P.H. Jones a, c, S. Dawson b, R.M. Gaskell a, K.P. Coyne a, Á. Tierney a, C. Setzkorn a, A.D. Radford a, P-J.M. Noble b, * a

University of Liverpool, Institute of Global Health, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK b University of Liverpool School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK c National Consortium for Zoonosis Research, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 795 6205. E-mail address: [email protected] (P-J.M. Noble).

Page 1 Page 1 of 21

20 21

Abstract Using the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET), a national

22

small animal disease-surveillance scheme, information on gastrointestinal disease was

23

collected for a total of 76 days between 10 May 2010 and 8 August 2011 from 16,223

24

consultations (including data from 9,115 individual dogs and 3,462 individual cats) from 42

25

premises belonging to 19 UK veterinary practices. During that period, 7% of dogs and 3% of

26

cats presented with diarrhoea.

27 28

Adult dogs had a higher proportional morbidity of diarrhoea (PMD) than adult cats (P

29

< 0.001). This difference was not observed in animals < 1 year old. Younger animals in both

30

species had higher PMDs than adult animals (P < 0.001). Neutering was associated with

31

reduced PMD in young male dogs. In adult dogs, miniature Schnauzers had the highest PMD.

32

Most animals with diarrhoea (51%) presented having been ill for 2-4 days, but a history of

33

vomiting or haemorrhagic diarrhoea was associated with a shorter time to presentation. The

34

most common treatments employed were dietary modification (66% of dogs; 63% of cats)

35

and antibacterials (63% of dogs; 49% of cats). There was variability in PMD between

36

different practices.

37 38

The SAVNET methodology facilitates rapid collection of cross-sectional data

39

regarding diarrhoea, a recognised sentinel for infectious disease, and characterises data that

40

could benchmark clinical practice and support the development of evidence-based medicine.

41 42

Keywords: Breed; Companion animal; Diarrhoea; Surveillance; SAVNET

43

Page 2 Page 2 of 21

44 45

Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) disease commonly results in the presentation of pets to UK

46

veterinary surgeons, but few national statistics record the frequency or the diagnostic and

47

therapeutic approach to these cases. A study of dogs presented to veterinary practices in the

48

USA suggested that 2.2% of veterinary consultations were related to diarrhoea (Lund et al.,

49

1999). In UK, a survey using client questionnaires reported that up to 20% of dogs had mild

50

vomiting and up to 15% had mild diarrhoea over a 2-week period (Hubbard et al., 2007), and

51

using data from notes provided with referral cases, German et al. (2010) highlighted the high

52

levels of antibacterial drugs used to treat GI disease. However, that study lacked

53

denominators to set it in the context of all animals with GI disease and was based on a

54

comparatively small sample with low statistical power.

55 56

Radford et al. (2011) showed that the presence of GI disease increased the probability

57

that a veterinary surgeon would prescribe antibacterials in first opinion practice, although the

58

prevalence of diarrhoea was not reported. In comparison, data on human disease are much

59

more detailed, with studies of far larger populations coordinated by National Health Service

60

recording and surveillance systems alongside national auditing (O'Brien et al., 2010; Smith et

61

al., 2010).

62 63

It is clear that a more coordinated approach to diarrhoea surveillance in companion

64

animals is needed. As well as quantifying the disease burden, such an approach could identify

65

risk factors for disease susceptibility as well as determining outcome measures associated

66

with specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, a prerequisite for the development of

67

evidence-based medicine. Changes in the incidence of diarrhoea could act as a sentinel for

68

infectious disease outbreaks (Smith et al., 2010) and warn of the emergence of new GI

Page 3 Page 3 of 21

69

pathogens.

70 Disease surveillance schemes exist for livestock 1 and horses.2 The Small Animal

71 72

Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) monitors disease in small animals attending

73

first opinion practice, using data collected from veterinary laboratories and near real-time

74

collection of consultation records from participating veterinary practices. In this novel study,

75

we used data gathered during pilot studies to establish the feasibility of SAVSNET

76

methodologies to profile the presentation, diagnostic approach and management choices for

77

dogs and cats presenting with diarrhoea to small animal practices in the UK.

78 79

Materials and methods

80

Data collection

81

Data were collected from practices using a compatible version of practice

82

management software (Premvet, Vetsolutions, v03.02.12) following a positive response to a

83

postal request. Seventy-four practices were approached, recruiting 16/59, 3/7, 0/6 and 0/2

84

practices in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, respectively (in total 19 practices

85

comprising 42 premises). Data on GI disease were collected over a total of 76 days between

86

10 May 2010 and 8 August 2011. Data were only collected from consultations relating to sick

87

animals, and excluded vaccine consultations.

88 89

At the end of each consultation, the veterinary surgeon was asked whether the case

1

See: AHVLA, 2012. Veterinary Laboratories Agency: Veterinary Investigation Surveillance Report. http://www.defra.gov.uk/ahvla-en/publication/vida12/ (accessed 29 May 2014).

2

See: AHT, 2012.Animal Health Trust. DEFRA/AHT/BEVA Equine Quarterly Disease Surveillance Reports. Animal Health Trust. http://www.aht.org.uk/cmsdisplay/disease_surveillance.html (accessed 29 May 2014).

Page 4 Page 4 of 21

90

had presented for vomiting or diarrhoea. If the answer to this question was ‘no’, the

91

questionnaire terminated; if ‘yes’, the questionnaire was completed as shown (Fig. 1). The

92

questionnaire responses, signalment and demographic data and the free text consultation

93

record were collected and stored in the SAVSNET database. Data were excluded if the client

94

had opted out of study participation.

95 96 97

Statistical analysis Multiple visits for individual animals were not included in the analysis. For animals

98

that never presented with diarrhoea, data from the first consultation only were used. For

99

animals that presented with diarrhoea, only data from the first consultation for diarrhoea were

100

selected. Thus, the proportions of cases of diarrhoea approximated the proportional morbidity

101

of diarrhoea (PMD; Martin et al., 1987), where the total number of diseased animals was

102

approximated by the total number of animals presenting to participating veterinary practices

103

for sick animal consultations.

104 105

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to model the presentation

106

of diarrhoea (as a binary dependent variable) and the resulting models were used to estimate

107

morbidity odds ratios (ORs), a statistic that can be interpreted as a relative risk on the

108

assumption that the morbidity rate for all other causes was unrelated to exposure to the risk

109

factor (Miettinen and Wang, 1981). The explanatory variables considered in the analysis

110

were species, breed, age and a combined gender-neutering variable that consisted of male-

111

entire, male-castrated, female-entire and female-neutered categories. Log-odds diarrhoea did

112

not show a clear linear association with age and, therefore, the continuous age variable was

113

categorised as young (< 1 year old), adult (1 to < 8 years old) or aged (≥ 8 years old).

114

Page 5 Page 5 of 21

115

Due to the very limited number of explanatory variables available, automated,

116

forwards and/or backwards stepwise algorithms for variable selection were not considered to

117

be appropriate and a more empirical approach was adopted. Based on a combination of

118

statistical and biological considerations, species and age were found to be the most important

119

explanatory variables. The effects of including additional variables or interaction terms were

120

assessed using likelihood ratio (LR) tests. The odds of animals presenting with diarrhoea

121

varied between practices and, therefore, following LR tests, the parameters of reported

122

models were recalculated using robust standard errors to account for intragroup correlation

123

within practices. The effects of each stage of the model building process are described in the

124

results. When testing many between-group comparisons using a single logistic regression

125

model, the overall Type I error (α) was controlled using the Bonferroni adjustment.

126 127

Many breeds were represented in the dataset. In cats, the vast majority of animals

128

were characterised as ‘domestic short-haired’, an unofficial breed that was most likely

129

applied indiscriminately to many cats, thereby limiting useful analysis. Breed was recorded

130

more reliably in dogs but many breeds and breed crosses were represented by only a few

131

individuals, limiting analysis of the whole dataset for breed associations with canine

132

diarrhoea. However, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed using a restricted

133

dataset consisting of breeds where there had been 10 or more cases of diarrhoea in adult

134

animals (≥ 1 year old).

135 136

Cases of diarrhoea were classified as either complicated (diarrhoea was haemorrhagic

137

and/or accompanied by vomiting) or uncomplicated. The time taken from the onset of clinical

138

signs to owners presenting sick animals to veterinary practices was recorded for each case.

139

For dogs and cats, the trend of odds of uncomplicated diarrhoea over each time category was

Page 6 Page 6 of 21

140

calculated using methods based on score statistics; the homogeneity of odds of haemorrhagic

141

diarrhoea across different gender-neuter status categories and, in dogs, across different

142

breeds, were similarly tested (StataCorp, 2007b). Descriptive statistics are presented to

143

illustrate the similarities and differences between diagnostic tests requested and the

144

treatments employed for cases of diarrhoea in dogs and cats. The comparison between dogs

145

and cats were made using univariate logistic regression.

146 147

Data were analysed using commercially available software (Excel, Microsoft and

148

Stata 10 IC, StataCorp, 2007). All proportions and logistic regression models were calculated

149

to allow for clustering within veterinary practices. In the case of large samples, confidence

150

intervals (CIs) were calculated directly, assuming a normal distribution of sample

151

proportions. When only small numbers were involved, CIs were estimated from logistic

152

regression models to avoid issues of error bars extending below zero or above 1. In all

153

analyses, statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

154 155

Results

156

Study sample

157

Individual consultation records (including repeated consultations for the same animal;

158

n=16,223) were recorded in the database in response to the ‘diarrhoea and vomiting’

159

questionnaire. Of these, 11,060 consultations (68%) were from dogs, 4,092 (25%) from cats,

160

387 (2%) from rabbits, 164 (1%) from guinea pigs, 416 (2.6%) from other species and 104

161

consultations where the species was not noted (Fig. 2a). Presentation for diarrhoea comprised

162

6% of canine consultations, 3% of feline consultations, 2% of rabbit consultations and 4% of

163

guinea pig consultations (Fig. 2b). Subsequently, data were analysed on a single visit per

164

animal basis, providing 9,115 and 3,462 unique records for dogs and cats, respectively.

Page 7 Page 7 of 21

165 166

As described, the odds of dogs presenting with diarrhoea were significantly different

167

between practices (likelihood-ratio χ2df=18=69.79; P < 0.001); the proportion ranged from 3-

168

13% (Fig. 3). In cats, the differences between practices were not statistically significant

169

(likelihood-ratio χ2df=18 = 14.73; P = 0.680; data not shown).

170 171

Species

172

On a single visit per animal basis, 7% of dogs and 3% of cats presented with

173

diarrhoea on at least one occasion. On univariate analysis, dogs were 2.2 (95% CI 1.8–2.6)

174

times more likely to present with diarrhoea than cats (P < 0.001; Table 1).

175 176 177

Age distribution The proportion of dogs and cats presenting with diarrhoea in each of the age

178

categories is shown in Table 1 and Fig. 4. The inclusion of age (and an interaction term)

179

significantly improved the fit of a model over one that contained species only. Species was

180

not associated with an increase or decrease in presentation with diarrhoea in puppies and

181

kittens (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.7-1.9, P = 0.470). However, adult and aged dogs were 3.2

182

(95% CI 2.3-4.5) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-2.9) times more likely, respectively, to present with

183

diarrhoea than cats of similar ages (Table 1). In both dogs and cats, adult animals were

184

significantly less likely to present with diarrhoea than young animals (dogs, ORadult vs. young =

185

0.6, 95% CI = 0.5–0.7, P Bonferroni < 0.001; ORaged vs. young = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.4–0.6, P Bonferroni <

186

0.001; cats, ORadult vs. young = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1–0.4, PBonferroni < 0.001, ORaged vs. young = 0.3,

187

95% CI = 0.2–0.4, PBonferroni < 0.001). In dogs and cats, no difference was observed in the

188

presentation with diarrhoea in aged and adult animals as calculated by the OR and 95% CI

189

(ORdogs = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.8–1.0, PBonferroni = 0.048; ORcats = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8–2.0, P =

Page 8 Page 8 of 21

190

1.000; see Fig. 4).

191 192

Gender and neutering

193

The inclusion of the sex-neutering status variable (together with interaction terms)

194

significantly improved the fit of the model compared to one that contained species only (P <

195

0.001). However, the inclusion of the gender-neutering variable (main effects only) did not

196

significantly improve the fit of the model over one that contained age and species (P =

197

0.402), although including all two- and three-way interaction terms did have a significant

198

effect (P = 0.025). In order to facilitate the interpretation of multiple interaction terms, further

199

analyses were conducted in dogs and cats separately. In dogs, the inclusion of gender-

200

neutering status (plus interactions) significantly improved the fit of the model that contained

201

age only (P = 0.025). Young, neutered males had a significantly reduced odds of disease

202

compared with entire male animals of the same age (PBonferroni < 0.001); there were no other

203

significant associations. In cats, gender-neutering status was not associated with diarrhoea

204

when age was included in the model (P = 0.189).

205 206

Breed

207

Breed was significantly associated with presentation for diarrhoea in adult dogs. The

208

PMD (± 95% CI) in adult/aged dogs (≥1 year) is shown in Fig. 5. Miniature schnauzers had

209

the highest PMD (19%, 95% CI 5-33) whilst West Highland white terriers had the lowest

210

PMD (3%, 95% CI, 1-6).

211 212 213 214

Duration of illness and presence of complicating factors Most animals with diarrhoea (51%) presented with a history of illness over the previous 2-4 days. The presence of haemorrhagic diarrhoea and/or concurrent vomiting

Page 9 Page 9 of 21

215

(‘complicated diarrhoea’) occurred in 43% of cases (12% had vomiting, 25% had

216

haemorrhagic diarrhoea and 6% had both vomiting and haemorrhagic diarrhoea). In dogs, the

217

odds of uncomplicated diarrhoea showed a highly significant (P < 0.001) increasing trend

218

across categories of duration of illness (i.e. uncomplicated diarrhoea was more common in

219

dogs presenting later in the course of clinical signs; Fig.6). A similar pattern was seen in cats,

220

but the numbers involved were smaller and the association was less pronounced (P = 0.041).

221 222

The tests of homogeneity of odds of haemorrhagic diarrhoea across breeds and

223

gender-neuter status categories in dogs >1 year were not statistically significant (P = 0.658

224

and P = 0.218, respectively). Similarly, the test for homogeneity of odds of haemorrhagic

225

diarrhoea across age categories was not statistically significant (P = 0.983).

226 227

Diagnostic tests performed

228

Diagnostic tests were performed in 16% of cases with diarrhoea (118/729; 15% of

229

dogs; 24% of cats). Haematology/serum biochemistry, parasitology and bacteriology were

230

the most common tests used in 7% dogs and 15% cats, 7% dogs and 8% of cats and 6% of

231

dogs and 7% of cats, respectively (Fig. 7). Other testing modalities included diagnostic

232

imaging, GI function tests and biopsy.

233 234

Treatment of diarrhoea

235

Dietary modification was used in the majority of cases of diarrhoea (66% of dogs;

236

63% cats), as were antibacterials (63% dogs; 49% cats). Intravenous fluids and oral fluids

237

were used relatively infrequently (4% and 1%, respectively, for dogs; 5% and 0%,

238

respectively, for cats; Fig. 8a). In dogs and cats, the probability of using antibacterials was

239

increased in cases where haemorrhagic diarrhoea had been noted (ORDogs 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-

Page 10 Page 10 of 21

240

6.9, P < 0.001; ORCats 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.2, P = 0.018; Fig. 8b). Potentiated amoxicillin,

241

metronidazole and amoxicillin were the most commonly chosen antibacterials (Fig. 8c). Use

242

of antibacterials did not change the probability that a dietary modification would be used.

243 244 245

Discussion This study demonstrates the frequency of GI disease as a presenting complaint in

246

small animal practice using proportional morbidity, a measure that has previously been used

247

in circumstances where a population denominator data has not been available. Proportional

248

morbidity, as an epidemiological measure, has the limitation in that the denominator is

249

affected by the prevalence of other diseases. In addition, the ratio of proportional morbidity

250

for groups that have either been exposed or unexposed to a given risk factor can be

251

interpreted as the relative risk only when the total overall morbidity in exposed and

252

unexposed groups is equal (Miettinen and Wang, 1981). Consequently, an increase in the

253

morbidity rate for the disease of interest would need to be accompanied by an equivalent

254

decrease in morbidity for all other causes for the relationship to hold, a condition that is

255

unlikely to be realised in practice. Alternatively, however, the morbidity OR can be used as

256

an estimate of relative risk providing the morbidity rate of all other causes is equal in both

257

exposed and unexposed groups – a condition that is much more likely to occur in real-life

258

situations (Miettinen and Wang, 1981). In the current study, the significant associations of

259

risk factors were assessed using morbidity ORs.

260 261

The PMD was in broad agreement with that seen in other UK-based studies. Stavisky

262

et al. (2010) reported that 16/186 (8.60%; 95%CI 5.00–13.59) randomly selected dogs that

263

presented to veterinary practices in the UK (not including vaccination consultations) showed

264

signs of diarrhoea whilst German et al. (2010) reported that 2,058 of approximately 40,000

Page 11 Page 11 of 21

265

(5.15%; 95%CI 4.93–5.37) dogs seen at a referral hospital had originally presented with

266

diarrhoea. However, the PMD was different from that reported in vet-visiting dogs in the

267

United States. Lund et al. (1999) estimated that the prevalence of diarrhoea in the vet-visiting

268

populations of dogs and cats was 2.2% (95%CI 2.0–2.4) and 1.8% (95%CI 1.6–2.0),

269

respectively. Based on the information presented by Lund et al. (1999), the PMD can be

270

estimated by removing vaccination and pre-operative checks from the denominators and is

271

calculated to be 2.37% (95%CI 2.20–2.55) and 2.74% (95%CI 2.43–3.08) for dogs and cats,

272

respectively. The difference in PMD between the UK and the US does not necessarily reflect

273

differences in the prevalence of diarrhoea in the two countries, but could instead indicate that

274

animals in the US are presented more frequently to veterinary practices for conditions other

275

than diarrhoea.

276 277

In both dogs and cats, the PMD was significantly higher in animals <1 year of age,

278

potentially reflecting a higher incidence of infectious diarrhoea in younger animals

279

(Batchelor et al., 2008), or a greater tendency to present young animals with diarrhoea to a

280

veterinary surgeon. Our study is in agreement with findings in a previous study evaluating the

281

frequency of diarrhoea in four selected breeds of dogs at different age intervals (Saevik et al.,

282

2012). Adult and aged cats were significantly less likely to be presented to a veterinary

283

surgeon for diarrhoea than dogs of equivalent ages.

284 285

While causes of diarrhoea in cats and dogs have broad similarities (Cooper, 2011;

286

Hall, 2009), the difference in PMD could reflect key species differences. More specific

287

information about these differences could be more readily analysed by collecting a larger

288

sample of consultations with more follow-through of individual animals, thereby allowing

289

further assessment of disease characteristics including overall duration, response to therapy

Page 12 Page 12 of 21

290

and the number of repeat visits. It is also possible that the low PMD in cats might be because

291

the faeces of adult/aged cats are often unobserved. As a consequence, diarrhoea that is not

292

accompanied by other clinical signs (such as weight loss, malaise or inappropriate

293

defaecation in the home) could go unnoticed.

294 295

Neutering appeared to be protective for diarrhoea in young (< 1 year) male dogs only.

296

The explanation for this association is not immediately obvious, but it could reflect

297

differences in the attitudes of the owners of these dogs towards presenting their pets to

298

veterinary practices, rather than a true reduction in the prevalence of diarrhoea in this

299

subgroup of animals.

300 301

Analysing the data by individual breeds produced small sub-populations. Despite this,

302

some interesting patterns began to emerge, highlighting the potential utility of this data to

303

identify breed-related disease risk factors. For example, Yorkshire terriers >1 year of age had

304

one of the highest PMD for diarrhoea among adult dogs. Protein-losing enteropathy has been

305

reported in this breed (Waddell and Michel, 2000) and might be a severe manifestation of the

306

predisposition to diarrhoea suggested here.

307 308

National and regional statistics for breed numbers would have been useful to provide

309

a denominator for breed presentation in this study. National statistics of pet ownership are

310

available from the Pet Food Manufacturers Association,3 however, these would not allow for

311

partial national coverage of veterinary practice surveillance or for local variations in disease

312

prevalence. Overall, comparatively small numbers of breed-specific predispositions were

3

See PFMA, 2012. Pet Food Manufacturers Association: Dogs by breed. http://www.pfma.org.uk/dogs-by-breed/ (accessed 29 May 2014).

Page 13 Page 13 of 21

313

identified. With ongoing data collection through SAVSNET, substantially larger datasets will

314

become available, allowing for higher resolution analysis of the breed and age associations

315

that were hinted at in the current study.

316 317

Dietary modification was the most common therapy consistent with the accepted

318

position that the majority of cases of diarrhoea presented to small animal practice reflect

319

either dietary indiscretion (Stavisky et al., 2011), or diet-responsive disease. Antibacterials

320

were frequently used to treat diarrhoea, in keeping with previous findings that diarrhoea

321

increased the probability that antibacterials would be used in veterinary consultations

322

(Radford et al., 2011) and were the most common treatment used in dogs with diarrhoea prior

323

to referral (German et al., 2010).

324 325

A number of infectious agents are recognised to cause diarrhoea (Hackett and Lappin

326

2003; Parsons et al., 2010) but, in the current study, confirmation of infection using faecal

327

sampling was only performed in 6% of cases. Antibiotic-responsive diarrhoea is recognised

328

(Hall, 2011; Hostutler et al., 2004; Westermarck et al., 2005) but represents a minority of

329

cases. Enteropathogens are often present in faeces (Hackett and Lappin 2003; Marks et al.,

330

2011; Stavisky et al., 2011) but these are often found in the absence of diarrhoea (Westgarth

331

et al., 2009). The use of antibacterials may reflect a perception that animals with diarrhoea

332

often lose mucosal barrier function and our study showed increased usage when haemorrhage

333

was present. However, in the absence of sepsis, there is no evidence that outcomes are

334

affected by use of antibacterials in cases of haemorrhagic diarrhoea (Unterer et al., 2011).

335

Thus, the frequent use of antibacterials might reflect our incomplete understanding of the role

336

of suspected pathogens in the pathogenesis of diarrhoea.

337

Page 14 Page 14 of 21

338

SAVSNET has undertaken to communicate individual practice statistics to facilitate

339

benchmarking of prescribing behaviour in relation to anonymised peers. When combined

340

with expert opinion and longer-term follow-up of cases through SAVSNET, such

341

benchmarking might help practitioners review practice protocols and clinical decision-

342

making.

343 344

The practices recruited to the SAVSNET pilot project were widely distributed around

345

England and Wales. Consequently, variations in PMD in, for example, dogs from different

346

practices, could have reflected differences in diagnostic procedures among veterinary

347

practices, or might have indicated true geographical differences in disease prevalence. While

348

variations in PMD between different practices could provide a surrogate for geographical

349

variations in PMD in this pilot study, SAVSNET data also includes full postcode

350

information, which will allow true geographical mapping of disease as the project expands.

351 352

Ultimately, it will be valuable to establish baseline data that characterise the

353

occurrence of GI disease in companion animals. The approach taken by SAVSNET requires

354

the completion of short questionnaires by participating veterinary surgeons at the end of each

355

consultation. Questionnaire responses, together with signalment data and clinical notes, are

356

collated and stored on SAVSNET servers. SAVSNET will also have access to laboratory data

357

regarding the diagnosis of, for instance, infectious diarrhoea. This multi-component approach

358

allows for cross-correlation of data between different sources and parallels the approach

359

taken in large studies in human medicine (O'Brien et al., 2010).

360 361 362

Conclusions SAVSNET allows the collection of ethically-approved surveillance data in real-time

Page 15 Page 15 of 21

363

from veterinary practices. Using limited data from pilot studies, this study demonstrated the

364

ability to identify age and breed variation in PMD as well as inter-practice variation in PMD.

365

Factors were identified that could potentially influence clinical decision-making in practice.

366

Combined with expert opinion, data so gathered could be used to benchmark clinical

367

approaches in participating practices and identify targets for veterinary education and

368

research.

369 370 371 372

Conflict of interest statement None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

373 374 375

Acknowledgements During the study period (September 2008 - August 2011), SAVSNET was funded by

376

a consortium including Dechra, Defra, IntervetSP, Merial, Novartis, Pfizer, University of

377

Liverpool and Virbac, and was additionally supported by BSAVA. We are extremely grateful

378

to the 19 practices that participated in this study, and to our colleagues at Vet Solutions

379

without whose dedicated help and support, collection of these data would not have been

380

possible.

381 382

References

383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393

Batchelor, D.J., Tzannes, S., Graham, P.A., Wastling, J.M., Pinchbeck, G.L., German, A.J., 2008. Detection of endoparasites with zoonotic potential in dogs with gastrointestinal disease in the UK. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 55, 99–104. Cooper, S., 2011. Recurrent diarrhoea in cats. In Practice 33, 272–281. Feldman, R.A., Banatvala, N., 1994. The frequency of culturing stools from adults with diarrhoea in Great Britain. Epidemiology and Infection 113, 41–44. German, A.J., Halladay, L.J., Noble, P.J.M., 2010. First-choice therapy for dogs presenting with diarrhoea in clinical practice. Veterinary Record 167, 810–814. Page 16 Page 16 of 21

394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443

Hackett, T., Lappin, M.R., 2003. Prevalence of enteric pathogens in dogs of north-central Colorado. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 39, 52–56. Hall, E., 2009. Canine diarrhoea: a rational approach to diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. In Practice 31, 8–16. Hall, E.J., 2011. Antibiotic-responsive diarrhea in small animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 41, 273–286. Hostutler, R., Luria, B., Johnson, S., Weisbrode, S., Sherding, R., Jaeger, J., Guilford, W., 2004. Antibiotic-responsive histiocytic ulcerative colitis in 9 dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 18, 499–504. Hubbard, K., Skelly, B.J., McKelvie, J., Wood, J.L.N., 2007. Risk of vomiting and diarrhoea in dogs. Veterinary Record 161, 755–757. Lund, E.M., Armstrong, P.J., Kirk, C.A., Kolar, L.M., Klausner, J.S., 1999. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 214, 1336–1341. Marks, S.L., Rankin, S.C., Byrne, B.A., Weese, J.S., 2011. Enteropathogenic bacteria in dogs and cats: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and control. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 25, 1195–1208. Martin, S.W., Meek, A.H., Willeberg, P., 1987. Veterinary Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, p75. Miettinen, O.S. and Wang, J-D., 1981. An alternative to the proportionate mortality ratio. American Journal of Epidemiology 114, 144-148. O'Brien, S.J., Rait, G., Hunter, P.R., Gray, J.J., Bolton, F.J., Tompkins, D.S., McLauchlin, J., et al., 2010. Methods for determining disease burden and calibrating national surveillance data in the United Kingdom: the second study of infectious intestinal disease in the community (IID2 study). BMC Medical Research Methodology 10, 39. Parsons, B.N., Porter, C.J., Ryvar, R., Stavisky, J., Williams, N.J., Pinchbeck, G.L., Birtles, R.J., et al., 2010. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in a cross-sectional study of dogs attending veterinary practices in the UK and risk indicators associated with shedding. The Veterinary Journal 184, 66–70. Radford, A.D., Noble, P.-J., Coyne, K.P., Gaskell, R.M., Jones, P.H., Bryan, J.G.E., Setzkorn, C., Tierney, A., Dawson, S., 2011. Antibacterial prescribing patterns in small animal veterinary practice identified via SAVSNET: the small animal veterinary surveillance network. Veterinary Record 169, 310–U91. Saevik, B.K., Skancke, E.M., Trangerud, C., 2012. A longitudinal study on diarrhoea and vomiting in young dogs of four large breeds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54, 8. Smith, S., Elliot, A.J., Mallaghan, C., Modha, D., Hippisley-Cox, J., Large, S., Regan, M., Page 17 Page 17 of 21

444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479

Smith, G.E., 2010. Value of syndromic surveillance in monitoring a focal waterborne outbreak due to an unusual Cryptosporidium genotype in Northamptonshire, United Kingdom, June - July 2008. Euro surveillance: Bulletin Européen sur les Maladies Transmissibles. European Communicable Disease Bulletin 15, 19643. StataCorp. 2007. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA. StataCorp. 2007b. Stata 10 Survival Analysis and Epidemiological Tables. Stata Press, College Station, TX, USA, p75. Stavisky, J., Pinchbeck, G.L., German, A.J., Dawson, S., Gaskell, R.M., Ryvar, R., Radford, A.D., 2010. Prevalence of canine enteric coronavirus in a cross-sectional survey of dogs presenting at veterinary practices. Veterinary Microbiology 140, 18-24. Stavisky, J., Radford, A.D., Gaskell, R., Dawson, S., German, A., Parsons, B., Clegg, S., Newman, J., Pinchbeck, G., 2011. A case-control study of pathogen and lifestyle risk factors for diarrhoea in dogs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 99, 185–192. Unterer, S., Strohmeyer, K., Kruse, B.D., Sauter-Louis, C., Hartmann, K., 2011. Treatment of aseptic dogs with hemorrhagic gastroenteritis with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a prospective blinded study. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 25, 973–979. Waddell, L., Michel, K., 2000. Hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia associated with proteinlosing enteropathy in Yorkshire Terriers: five cases (1992-1998). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217, 703–706. Westermarck, E., Skrzypczak, T., Harmoinen, J., Steiner, J., Ruaux, C., Williams, D., Eerola, E., Sundback, P., Rinkinen, M., 2005. Tylosin-responsive chronic diarrhea in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 19, 177-186. Westgarth, C., Porter, C.J., Nicolson, L., Birtles, R.J., Williams, N.J., Hart, C.A., Pinchbeck, G.L., Gaskell, R.M., Christley, R.M., Dawson, S., 2009. Risk factors for the carriage of Campylobacter upsaliensis by dogs in a community in Cheshire. Veterinary Record 165, 526–530.

Page 18 Page 18 of 21

480

Table 1

481

Species associations with proportional morbidity of diarrhoea (PMD) stratified by age category

482 Age category Young (< 1 year) Adult (1-7.99 years) Aged (≥ 8 years) All ages 483 484 485 486

Cat

33

326

PMD (95% CI) a 0.092 (0.058, 0.13)

Dog

109

900

0.108 (0.087, 0.129)

1.2 (0.6, 1.8)

0.508

Cat

26

1166

0.022 (0.014, 0.030)

1.00



Dog

293

4066

0.067 (0.056, 0.079)

3.2 (2.2, 4.3)

0.000

Cat

49

1772

0.027 (0.020, 0.034)

1.00



Dog

219

3458

0.060 (0.050, 0.069)

2.3 (1.8, 2.8)

0.000

Cat Dog

108 621

3264 8424

0.032 (0.026, 0.038) 0.069 (0.059, 0.079)

1.0 2.2 (1.8,2.6)

0.000

Species Cases Controls

Odds ratio (95% CI) a 1.0

P –

95% CI, 95% Confidence interval a Confidence intervals calculated to allow for intragroup correlation within veterinary practice.

Page 19 Page 19 of 21

487

Figure legends

488 489

Fig. 1. The sequence of questions presented to the veterinary surgeon on completion of the

490

consultation is shown. * Indicates questions where multiple answer options were allowed.

491 492

Fig. 2. The study population. (a) Pie chart with segments representing proportions of different

493

species in the population questioned about diarrhoea. (b) Percentage of cases with diarrhoea

494

by species. Bars represent percentage of individuals presenting with diarrhoea for each

495

species (only species occurring in ≥100 consultations are shown).

496 497

Fig. 3. Proportional morbidity of diarrhoea (PMD) in dogs at individual veterinary practice

498

branches (anonymised). Bars represent the PMD for dogs presenting at individual practice

499

branches where the branch contributed >100 records to the study.

500 501

Fig. 4. The proportional morbidity of diarrhoea (PMD) in dogs and cats, segregated by age

502

group. Bars represent PMD of diarrhoea in dogs (grey bars) and cats (white bars) in indicated

503

age groups (± 95% confidence interval). Practice-adjusted odds ratios for groups with

504

common labels (a, b or c) were not significantly different (Bonferroni-adjusted P > 0.05).

505 506

Fig. 5. Breeds with diarrhoea. Proportional morbidity of diarrhoea (PMD) in individual

507

breeds is shown for adult/aged dogs (≥1 year). Bars represent PMD (± 95% confidence

508

intervals) for each breed. For the purposes of this study, the term ‘cross’ refers to a non-

509

pedigree animal where the breeds of one or more of the parents are recognizable and have

510

been recorded in the animal’s record. The term ‘crossbreed’ refers to a non-pedigree animal

511

where the breeds of the parents have not been recorded.

512 Page 20 Page 20 of 21

513

Fig. 6. The proportions of dogs and cats with uncomplicated diarrhoea presenting after given

514

durations of illness. Bars represent cases classed as uncomplicated (no vomiting or

515

haemorrhage) as a proportion of all cases of diarrhoea with a given duration of illness prior to

516

presentation. Strata representing 5-7 days and ≥8 days have been collapsed into a single

517

category to ensure sufficient sample size at each level. Grey bars represent dogs and white

518

bars represent cats.

519 520

Fig. 7. Diagnostic tests performed in cases of diarrhoea. Bars represent the proportion of

521

cases for which the given diagnostic test was performed. Grey bars represent dogs and white

522

bars represent cats. TLI, trypsin-like immunoreactivity; PLI, pancreatic lipase

523

immunoreactivity.

524 525

Fig. 8. Treatment choices in diarrhoea. (a) Frequency of use of different treatment classes.

526

Bars represent proportions of cases receiving a given treatment. (b) Frequency of use of

527

antibacterials in cases presenting with haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic diarrhoea, bars

528

represent proportion of cases (± 95% confidence intervals) treated with antibacterials (*

529

indicates proportion different to ‘no’ group, P < 0.05). (c) Antibacterials used in treating

530

diarrhoea. Bars represent the proportion of diarrhoea cases that were treated with

531

antibacterials that received each drug type. Grey bars represent dogs and white bars represent

532

cats.

Page 21 Page 21 of 21