Accepted Manuscript Sydney Harbour: Beautiful, diverse, valuable and pressured J.L. Banks, L.H. Hedge, C. Hoisington, E.M. Strain, P.D. Steinberg, E.L. Johnston PII: DOI: Reference:
S2352-4855(16)30052-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.04.007 RSMA 130
To appear in:
Regional Studies in Marine Science
Received date: 10 August 2015 Revised date: 27 April 2016 Accepted date: 28 April 2016 Please cite this article as: Banks, J.L., Hedge, L.H., Hoisington, C., Strain, E.M., Steinberg, P.D., Johnston, E.L., Sydney Harbour: Beautiful, diverse, valuable and pressured. Regional Studies in Marine Science (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.04.007 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References
1
Title: Sydney Harbour: beautiful, diverse, valuable and pressured
2
Author names and affiliations:
3
Banks J.L.1, Hedge L.H.1, Hoisington, C.1, Strain, E.M. 1, Steinberg P.D.1,2 and Johnston E.L.1,2
4
1
5
2088, Sydney, Australia
6
2
7
Corresponding author:
8
Dr Joanne Banks, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Building 19 Chowder Bay Rd, Mosman NSW
9
2088,
[email protected],au, T: +61 412 800 839
Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman, New South Wales,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052
10
Keywords: Sydney Harbour; threats; socio-economic; culture
11
Abstract
12
Sydney’s Harbour is an integral part of the city providing natural, social, and economic benefits to 4.84
13
million residents. It has significant environmental value including a diverse range of habitats and
14
animals. A range of anthropogenic and environmental pressures threatens these including loss and
15
modification of habitats, oversupply of nutrients and introduction of pollutants such as metals,
16
organics, and microplastics, introduction of non-indigenous species and the impacts of recreational
17
fishing. Many people now recognise not only the environmental value of Sydney Harbour, but also the
18
economic and social benefits a healthy harbour provides. Over 80% of residents recognise the
19
importance of maintaining a pollution-free coastal environment and conserving the Harbour’s
20
abundant and diverse marine life. A recent review gathered information to make some first estimates
21
of economic revenues and values associated with Sydney Harbour. Port and maritime revenues ($430
22
million/yr), ferries ($175 million/yr), cruise ship expenditure ($1025 million/yr), major foreshore
23
events such as New Year’s Eve and the Sydney Festival ($400 million/yr), and also income from
24
culture, heritage, arts and science (over $33 million/yr) inject considerable funds into the Australian
25
economy. Notably, proximity to the harbour enhances Sydney domestic real estate capital by an
26
estimated $40 billion, equivalent to $3,775 million/yr and biological ecosystem services were valued at
27
$175 million/yr. Here we provide i) a synthesis of our current understanding of the natural, social, and
28
economic resources of Sydney Harbour, ii) the threats and pressures these resources face, and finally
29
iii) how a new marine management framework is being used to address these threats to the natural,
30
social and economic wellbeing of Sydney Harbour. This review clearly shows that Sydney Harbour is a 1
31
valuable and valued environment that deserves continuing scientific, social, and economic research to
32
support management now and in the future.
33
1
34
Sydney Harbour, situated in south-eastern Australia (Latitude:-33.846355°, Longitude:151.212248°),
35
sits within a catchment of 4.84 million residents—approximately one-fifth of the total population of
36
Australia (23.49 million; (ABS 2013-14). The harbour is iconic, and is officially recognised as one of
37
Australia’s Natural Landscapes; areas that embody the cultural and natural spirit of the nation
38
(Tourism Australia 2013). The population of Sydney is set to grow by approx. 1.9 %/yr (City of Sydney
39
2014b) and is projected to reach 7 million by 2050. This upward trend places increasing pressure on
40
coastal resources and habitats (Barragán and de Andrés 2015). The natural habitats of the Harbour
41
and its threats have been extensively covered in Johnston (2015) and Mayer-Pinto (2015). Therefore
42
unlike the other world harbour reviews in this manuscript we only briefly describe the natural
43
resources and current threats, and focus on the history, and social and economic values associated
44
with the Harbour. This knowledge will contribute to this special issue reviewing the specific
45
opportunities and challenges found within harbour environments.
46
2
47
The Sydney Harbour surrounds were inhabited from up to 50,000 years ago (Heiss and Gibson 2015).
48
The most ancient camp, located at Cammeray in Middle Harbour (Figure 1), is approximately 6000
49
years old (Hoskins 2009). Campsites were usually located close to the shore, especially during summer
50
when fish and shellfish was the main food (Heiss and Gibson 2015). A prominent Harbour-side carving
51
of a marine creature with a man carved inside its body indicates the importance of the Harbour’s
52
marine resources to the local community (Figure 2) (Hoskins 2009).
53 54
Figure 1: A map of Sydney Harbour featuring sites mentioned in the text
2
Introduction
History
55
56 57
Figure 2: Aboriginal carving at Balls Head Reserve on Sydney’s North Shore (see Figure 1 for location).
58
Photograph (circa 1900) is in the North Sydney Heritage Centre Collection, Stanton Library (Hoskins 2009)
59
Europeans first entered Sydney Harbour on 28 April 1770; the 400-ton British ship The Endeavour,
60
under the captaincy of James Cook, sought safe anchorage, freshwater, food and a place for Joseph
61
Banks, the renowned naturalist, to gather flora and fauna (Hoskins 2009). Colonisation by the First
62
Fleet of British ships began in 1788 with the foundation of a penal colony (Hoskins 2009). The fleet
63
consisted of two Royal Navy vessels, three store ships and six convict transports, carrying more than
64
1,000 convicts, marines and seamen, and stores (Hoskins 2009). The expedition leader Captain Arthur
65
Phillip described Sydney Harbour as ‘one of the finest harbours in the world, in which a thousand sail of
66
the line might ride in perfect security’ (Hoskins 2009). The colony quickly grew with the arrival of the
67
Second (June 1790) and Third Fleets (August 1791) (Birch 2007). For the indigenous owners of the
68
land, the arrival of Europeans had devastating consequences: conflicts arose with the new settlers and
69
almost half of the population died in a smallpox epidemic (Heiss & Gibson, 2015).
70
The settlement developed rapidly from a penal colony to a thriving town and then city and a gateway
71
to the continent (Hoskins 2009). By the 1800s tanneries, metal foundries, coppersmiths and paint
72
manufacturers were established on the shores of the Harbour (Birch 2007). Shoreline industry
73
expanded along with imports of raw materials and exports of manufactured goods (Walsh 1962). By
74
the latter half of the century, engineering, building materials, metals, clothing and textiles were the
75
major industries on the foreshore (Birch 2007). Industrialisation of the Harbour surrounds grew rapidly
76
in the 19th century and into the first half of the 20th century. Factories, oil refineries, and power
77
stations made use of the freshwater supplies and transport links, and the surrounding population
78
continued to expand. By 1850, industry occupied 95 % of the eastern shoreline of Darling Harbour and
79
expanded into Iron Cove and Hen and Chicken Bay between 1892-1936 (Figure 1), (Birch et al. 2015). 3
80
The harbour environment deteriorated and water quality plummeted. Sewage and industrial pollution
81
were released directly into the Harbour and public abattoirs dumped blood, offal and effluent into the
82
drains and sewers (Hoskins 2009). During the summer months the smell from the harbour engulfed
83
the city, leading to fears of pestilence and disease (Hoskins 2009).
84
Despite these issues, the land surrounding the harbour rapidly urbanised (Birch et al. 2015). An 1888
85
painting of the Harbour by the artist A. H. Fulwood depicts the intimate connection between the busy
86
Harbour and its people (Figure 3). Sydney was and is a city ‘intrinsically connected to its waterfront’
87
(Hoskins 2009). Sydney’s population doubled between 1901 and the early 1920s (Hoskins 2009). Ferry
88
and railway expansion and the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge enabled settlement to the north
89
and west of the Harbour (Birch et al. 2015). By the end of the Second World War Sydney began its
90
gradual evolution from a site of heavy industry and shipping to the more modern city that we know
91
today (Hoskins 2009). Over the next half a century, heavy industries such as chemical plants, gasworks,
92
and paint manufacturers relocated from the waterfront and the input of heavy metal and organic
93
contaminants reduced (Birch 2007). In addition, the Harbour began to lose it status as a major
94
shipping terminal (Hoskins 2009).
95 96
Figure 3: Bird's-eye view of Sydney, 1888 / A.H. Fullwood. ‘A representation of a city intrinsically connected to its
97
waterfront (Hoskins 2009). Reproduced with permission of Sydney’s Historic Houses Trust,
98
http://collection.hht.net.au/firsthhtpictures/fullRecordPicture.jsp?recnoListAttr=recnoList&recno=41984
99
Prior to 1960, Sydney's international shipping facilities were exclusively located at Darling Harbour and
100
Walsh Bay, with bulk and break bulk docks, and bulk and roll-on, roll-off docks at Glebe Island and 4
101
White Bay (Figure 1), (Port Authority of New South Wales 2016). However, as both the volumes of
102
trade and the size of ships increased, Sydney’s wharves were gradually becoming less adequate
103
(Sydney Ports Accessed 05.04.16) and the Harbour’s steep topography made further reclamation of
104
land difficult (Hoskins 2009). As a result, in 1979, a deep-water seaport located in Botany Bay, Port
105
Botany, was opened to the south of the city and this has since become Australia’s second biggest
106
container port (Sydney Ports Accessed 05.04.16).
107
By the 1960s Sydney was fast becoming Australia’s financial capital and the waterfront close to the
108
CBD was rapidly modernised (Hoskins 2009). By the 1980s the city and its harbour was a global tourist
109
attraction: the number of tourists increased from approximately 1 to 5 million from 1980 to 1985
110
(Hoskins 2009). The waterfront Sydney Opera House had opened in 1973, highlighting the cultural
111
development of the city. The Bicentennial celebrations of 1988 continued the development of ‘cultural
112
precincts’ remodelling the waterfront and replacing old harbour infrastructure (Hoskins 2009). In
113
2000, Sydney hosted the successful 2000 Olympics, engendering a massive shoreline rehabilitation
114
program at Homebush Bay (Figure 1), a former wetland site that had been heavily degraded by a
115
century worth of pollution from an abattoir, brickworks, armaments depot and waste dumps
116
(Burchett et al. 1999). Sydney is now a world city – cosmopolitan, vibrant with culture, and an
117
economic powerhouse. Sydney Harbour has been integral to its evolution.
118
2.1
119
Sydney Harbour lies in the Hawkesbury Sandstone and Ashfield Shale of the Sydney Basin. It is a
120
drowned river valley that formed approximately 10,000 years ago during a rise in sea level (Roy 1984,
121
Birch 2007). The estuary is approximately 30 km long with an area of 50 km2 and a total catchment of
122
about 500 km2 (Birch 2007) and a steep sandstone shoreline approximately 300 km long (Creese et al.
123
2009). The entrance to the harbour is 3 km wide and ~30 m deep (Hutchings et al. 2013). Tidal
124
patterns generally determine circulation in Sydney Harbour and tides are diurnal, reversing every six
125
hours (Das et al. 2000) and the maximum tidal range is 2.1 m (Roy et al. 2001). The bathymetry is
126
complex consisting of dredged channels for shipping, a number of deep holes (28-45m) and shallow
127
embayments (Figure 4) (OzCoasts 2015). Sand, transported by waves, has created a tidal delta at the
128
mouth and sediments transported and deposited by rivers have formed a fluvial delta in the upper
129
parts of the estuary (Johnston et al. 2015). Thus the sand content of the bottom sediments decreases
130
upstream: the lower harbour towards the mouth has mostly sandy sediments, the central and upper
131
harbours have mostly muddy sand sediments, and the shallow mid-harbour embayments are mostly
132
blanketed in thick mud (Birch 2007).
5
Geology
133 134
Figure 4: The bathymetry of Sydney Harbour, which includes a series of deep ‘holes'. The dashed line indicates the
135
position of the landward margin of the flood tide delta. To the west (left) of this line the bottom sediments
136
become dominated by terrestrial mud (OzCoasts 2015)
137
2.2
138
Sydney’s climate is temperate-humid; the mean atmospheric temperature range from a mean
139
minimum of 8.1 °C to a mean maximum of 16.3 °C in July (austral winter) and from a mean minimum
140
of 18.7 °C to a mean maximum of 25.9 °C in January (austral summer), (Bureau of Metereology).
141
Under normal conditions rainfall in the Sydney catchments is small, with 32.7 mean number of days of
142
rain > 10 mm per year (157 year average), (Bureau of Metereology). During these dryer periods, inputs
143
of freshwater are low, and the harbour remains mostly saline (Lee et al. 2011, Lee and Birch. 2012).
144
However, under periodic heavy rainfall conditions (>50 mm/day), large volumes of rainwater flow into
145
the harbour creating an upper freshwater layer up to 2m thick (Beck and Birch 2012a).
146
3
147
Sydney Harbour has a diverse biota reflecting the diversity of the habitats found in the Harbour
148
including: rocky intertidal, mangrove, saltmarsh, sub-tidal rocky reef, seagrass, soft-sediments,
149
beaches and open water systems (Johnston et al. 2015). These habitats support a rich diversity with
150
over 3000 species of crustacea, mollusc, fish, polychaete and echinoderm species (Hutchings et al.
151
2013) and an unknown number of microbial taxa (estimated at > 10,000 by Chariton et al. 2010).
152
There are a number of threats to this diversity and resultant ecosystem functioning. Over 50% of the
153
original shoreline of Sydney Harbour has been altered and replaced with artificial structures such as
154
seawalls and pontoons (Chapman and Bulleri 2003, Mayer-Pinto et al. 2015). These changes can have
155
major impacts on adjacent ecosystems (e.g. soft-sediment and rocky-shore communities) via physical
156
disturbance, loss of habitat, and noise and light pollution (Airoldi and Beck 2007, Dafforn et al. 2015a).
157
The Sydney Harbour catchment is largely impervious to rainfall, due to infrastructure and housing, and
158
stormwater run-off can be as great as 500 gigalitres per year (Beck and Birch 2012b). Stormwater
159
contains an array of pollutants such as litter, sediment, oil and metals that are picked up from roads 6
Climate and hydrology
The natural resources of Sydney Harbour and current threats
160
and properties (Beck and Birch 2012b).
161
Other pollution sources are from a large chemical industry that historically operated in the western
162
areas of Sydney Harbour (Birch and Taylor 2000, McCready et al. 2000, McCready et al. 2004). Poor
163
environmental management strategies and waste disposal mechanisms at the time created pockets of
164
dangerous contamination, in particular dioxins, Pb and other heavy metals (Dafforn et al. 2012). The
165
introduction of the Clean Waters Act and Regulations in the early 1970s banned the dumping of
166
domestic and industrial waste into the harbour (except under licence), producing an improvement in
167
water and sediment quality (Birch and Taylor 2000). There remains, however, a historical legacy of
168
contamination in the benthic sediments around these areas (Dafforn et al. 2012).
169
Introduced marine species are a problem in ports and coastal waters around the world and Sydney
170
Harbour has a diverse array (AMBS 2002). In 1996, Australia’s Centre for Research on Introduced Pests
171
formulated sampling protocols for Australian Ports prioritising sampling areas and targeted species
172
likely to create the most disturbance within the Australian environment (Hewitt and Martin 1996). The
173
report recommended top priority areas for sampling within ports: 1) around commercial shipping
174
facilities, particularly active berths and slipways, and 2) around non-commercial facilities, particularly
175
mariculture facilities and fishing vessel berths and moorings (Hewitt and Martin 1996). Species of
176
particular concern were identified as Schedule 1: those classified by the Australian Ballast Water
177
Management Advisory Council (ABWMAC) as target introduced pest species and Schedule 2) marine
178
species that pose a threat to Australia (Hewitt and Martin 1996). Two schedule 1 species have been
179
recorded in Sydney Harbour – the toxic dinoflagellates Alexandrium catenella and A. tamarense; and
180
one species in Schedule 2 – the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) (AMBS 2002).
181
Climate change is also likely to impact upon the ecosystems of Sydney Harbour as waters warm, sea
182
level rises and ocean acidification progresses (Mayer-Pinto et al. 2015). Warming waters in subtidal
183
waters could result in the south-ward expansion of tropical species and northern retreat of temperate
184
species (Hughes 2003), altered biotic interactions (Vergés et al. 2014), and potentially greater
185
exposure of hosts to pathogens and disease (Lafferty et al. 2015). In the intertidal, sea level rise,
186
warming and changes in precipitation and salinity may lead to loss of foreshore and intertidal
187
vegetation and changes to some natural systems (Johnston et al. 2015).
188
4
189
Some argue that a key socio-ecological question of our times is whether humans are losing their
190
connection with the natural world (Vining et al. 2008) and if so, what are the consequences of this
191
(Mayer and Frantz 2004). One idea is that to protect the natural environment and use its resources
192
sustainably, humans first need personally to value it in monetary terms. This can be difficult because 7
Societal-environmental interactions in Sydney Harbour
193
the social benefits conferred by natural resources, such as security, basic material for good life, health
194
and good social relations (Pleasant et al. 2014), are rarely captured by conventional market-based
195
economic activity and analysis (Balmford et al. 2002, Glaser and Glaeser 2011).
196
It is clear that many people value the natural world in many ways without reference to financial or
197
economic values. We like walking along the Harbour or picnicking in a park, swimming etc. without
198
any thought of estimating economic values for these activities. However, when decision-makers have
199
to decide where public funds will be spent (and sometimes private investors also), benefit-cost (and
200
other financial calculations) become important. This is where non-estimated values, whether social,
201
environmental or others tend to be left out because we often do not have the means to put them into
202
monetary terms. When decisions regarding funding priorities and budgets are based on financial
203
calculations, the non-estimated values become in effect zero, despite the fact that people may care a
204
great deal about these non-quantified and non-estimated values.
205
However, efforts are now made to review the non-monetary values that humans place on their
206
natural environment (Lehtonen 2004, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005, Millennium Assessment
207
2005, Olsen et al. 2006, Glaser and Glaeser 2011, de Jonge et al. 2012) and, increasingly, researchers
208
are incorporating the valuation of ecosystem services in environmental decision making (Heal et al.
209
2005, Fisher et al. 2009, Jones-Walters and Mulder 2009, Liu et al. 2010, Atkins et al. 2011, Luisetti et
210
al. 2011, van den Belt 2011, Costanza et al. 2014, Dickinson et al. 2015, Guerry et al. 2015, Li et al.
211
2015, Marre et al. 2015, Ruckelshaus et al. 2015).
212
In this vein, in a recent review of the economics of Sydney Harbour, Hoisington (2015) characterised
213
the economic values of Sydney Harbour as all aspects of the Harbour ‘that society would want to
214
retain or enhance, and for which it would consider incurring a sacrifice’. The report, Our Harbour Our
215
Asset made a first attempt to gather and assemble data on all of the wide range of uses and values for
216
which Sydney Harbour is essential or very important. The report was organised into eight groupings of
217
values, ranging from harbour activities through social values to ecosystems services. It is a compilation
218
of estimations and a listing of information gaps. It offers a framework for beginning the complex task
219
of estimating values of a harbour that residents and visitors use in a variety of ways and value highly,
220
without directly paying for the harbour itself.
221
The economic assessments include user activities that can be explicitly calculated or estimated (e.g.,
222
the marginal uplift in property values, the total revenue for boat storage and mooring operations, or
223
the generation of income for local businesses as a result of Harbour-side events), and also those that
224
rely implicitly on the Harbour to provide goods and services. The latter includes the non-material
225
benefits to the community such as beach trips, swimming, snorkelling, diving, boating, bushwalking, 8
226
and enjoyment of the natural beauty. Recreation activities such as these have become a major
227
contributor to the gross domestic product (GDP) and wellbeing of coastal populations worldwide
228
(Ghermandi et al. 2011). Here we summarise key features of the review.
229
At the centre of a populous city, Sydney Harbour supports a transport network, tourism and cruise-
230
liners, port operations, a large recreational boating community, fishers, swimmers, divers, snorkelers,
231
adventure and entertainment seekers, and many users of harbour-side parks and walkways. Many
232
private businesses are associated with these uses of the Harbour, but financial revenue data is often
233
commercial in confidence. Therefore, only some of these values (harbour operations, cruise ships,
234
ferries, and some major events and icons) are estimated. The value of scientific research and the more
235
abstract values of aesthetic enjoyment and the spiritual beliefs of traditional owners are also
236
important, but unquantified.
237
For some people, a boat trip on the Harbour forms part of their daily commute while others use ferries
238
for recreation. Out of 14.7 million ferry journeys in 2011-12, sightseers made commuters made 32 %
239
and 47 % (Sydney Ferries 2012). During this time Sydney Ferries generated a $9.8 m income surplus
240
(Sydney Ferries 2012). Not quantified is the additional economic value attributable to both the
241
aesthetic value of travelling by ferry and resulting from there being fewer cars on the road, lessening
242
road maintenance costs and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
243
The Glebe Island and White Bay port precincts in Sydney Harbour are home to deep-water berths that
244
accommodate dry bulk imports and cruise terminals (Figure 1), (Port Authority of New South Wales
245
2016). Although most Sydney-bound container traffic now flows to Port Botany, the Harbour supports
246
a substantial volume of vessels. In 2013, 1419 commercial vessels were recorded in Sydney Harbour
247
(Maritime Management Centre 2013). Sydney Port Operations generated $80.1 m income in 2014
248
with 1.570 million mass tonnes of total trade, comprised of 1.345 million mass tonnes of bulk liquids,
249
gas and oil and dry bulk (Sydney Ports Corporation 2014). Note that this figure combines Sydney
250
Harbour figures with those for the much larger Port Botany and the report did not supply the
251
information necessary to separate the accounts.
252
Recreational boaters use Sydney Harbour for sailing, kayaking, motor cruising, fishing, and attending
253
public events such as New Year’s Eve fireworks (NSW RMS 2012). The harbour has a large number of
254
boat moorings: 4850 private, 920 commercial, 1700 marine berths, 220 marina-visitor and charter
255
vessel berths, 1680 domestic berths, moorings and associated storage spaces, and 480 private marina
256
berths (Maritime Management Centre 2013).
257
Fishing, whether via boat or from the shore, is popular: a three-month survey of recreational fishers in
258
the summer of 2008 recorded 300,000 hours of daytime fishing effort on the Harbour (Ghosn et al. 9
259
2010). In 2013, recreational fishing was worth $71 m/year based on figures for amount spent on
260
equipment and supplies (Hoisington 2015) rather than the lesser value of retail equivalent prices for
261
fish caught. Additionally, Sydney resident day fishers are estimated to spend around $100/day (in
262
2003 figures) on tackle, boat fuel and hire, clothes and travel (Dominion Consulting PL 2003, McIlgorm
263
and Pepperell 2013 ). A large proportion (62 %) of fishing in Sydney Harbour is from the shore, with
264
average expenditure estimated at $75/day (Hoisington 2015).
265
Sydney is an internationally renowned tourist destination receiving 2.6 million international visitors in
266
2012-13 (Tourism Australia 2013). Tourist expenditure in Sydney in 2014 was estimated at $14.5
267
billion, although these figures are for Sydney as a whole, it is frequently acknowledged that the
268
Harbour is a vital part of the city’s appeal (Destination NSW 2015). The growth of the cruise ship
269
industry overall, largely from tourists, but to some extent by Australian travellers as well, has been
270
around 24% per year for about 10 years. During 2009/10, 119 cruise ships visited Sydney Harbour,
271
while 280 were scheduled for 2014/15 (AEC Group Ltd. 2013 , Sydney Ports Corporation 2014). Visitors
272
and residents use the Harbour side for walks (there are 122 km of Harbour walks), visiting parks and
273
reserves, dining out, as well as water recreation such as swimming, diving, and snorkelling.
274
Residents and tourists also visit the most well-known and iconic sights in the Harbour, including the
275
Opera House, Darling Harbour and the Botanical Gardens, which are closely related to the Harbour.
276
Revenue figures for some of these were found (e.g. the Opera House and immediate surrounds are
277
estimated at $245 million/year in value added, and Taronga Zoo revenues at $42 million just in entry
278
fees), but the value of these in attracting tourists is hard to quantify (Hoisington 2015). In addition, it is
279
estimated that 86,000 people are directly employed in the tourism industry in Sydney (Tourism
280
Australia 2013).
281
A large number of events take place on the water or on foreshores of the Harbour, and enjoyed by
282
residents and visitors alike. The value of some of the foreshore events has been estimated (City of
283
Sydney 2014a, Thomsen 2014, Destination NSW 2015).
284 285
New Year’s Eve fireworks – $156 m (http://www.sydney.com/destinations/sydney/sydneycity/new-years-eve-sydney)
286
Sydney Festival – $57 m (http://www.sydneyfestival.org.au/info/)
287
Handa Opera – $30 m (http://www.sydney.com/events/handa-opera-on-sydney-harbour)
288
Vivid Festival – $20 m (http://www.vividsydney.com/ )
289
The Harbour is also a centre of employment in traditional port industries, such as cargo handling and
290
cruise liner docking, as well as in recreation and tourism oriented businesses, for example harbour-
291
side attractions, such as the Sydney Opera House and Opera Bridge, as well as restaurants, nightclubs 10
292
and bars. The value of retail and services was not estimated due to the private ‘commercial in
293
confidence’ basis of such financial information. Businesses benefiting from proximity to the Harbour
294
include: water taxis; marinas and commercial docks; boating businesses; fishing businesses; water
295
sport businesses; charter boats; sightseeing and commuter seaplanes; and Harbour-side restaurants.
296
The visual appeal of the Harbour and the desire to be close to its amenities adds a massive boost to
297
the Sydney property market. Proximity to the Harbour greatly increases residential property values. A
298
$40 billion price premium has been estimated for private residences near the Harbour (Hoisington
299
2015, based on data from NSW Government 2012 and 2013) and four of the top five most expensive
300
suburbs in Australia have Sydney Harbour frontage or views (Pelosi 2014).
301
Natural environments still provide humanity with critical ecosystem services (Balmford et al. 2002, de
302
Jonge et al. 2012). Ecosystem services are the benefits people derive from functioning ecosystems; the
303
ecological characteristics, functions, or processes that directly or indirectly contribute to human well-
304
being (Costanza et al. 1997, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). Understanding the value of
305
ecosystem services to society, relative to other marketed and non-marketed goods and services, as
306
well as the costs of their loss and degradation is vital for policy, planning, and regulatory decisions
307
(Fisher and Kerry Turner 2008, Costanza et al. 2011). Examples of useful environmental functions
308
provided by Sydney Harbour include: water filtration, nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration,
309
cooling the city and moderating its temperature swings, providing nurseries for important seafood
310
species for recreational fishers in the harbour and (for both recreational and commercial fishers) in
311
the ocean and aesthetic and recreational value.
312
Hoisington used an assessment of the value of ecosystem services in Australian estuaries (calculated in
313
Blackwell 2005) to estimate those in the Harbour. The ecosystem services provided by Sydney Harbour
314
are estimated as $175 million per year taking as an area the entire estuary of 55 km2, but reducing the
315
area estimated for swimming to 3 km2 and for fish nursery services to 15km2. A survey of all the
316
ecosystem services provided by Sydney Harbour along with a more accurate calculation of their value
317
will be an important next step in identifying species, habitats, and spatial areas to protect for the
318
maintenance of key goods and services.
319
5
320
5.1
321
The natural resource management of Sydney Harbour is made particularly difficult given the Harbour
322
sits in such a large, urbanised catchment, with a community that places much social and economic
323
value on a functioning Harbour ecosystem (Hedge et al. 2014b). In the past few years there has been a 11
Managing a complex, urbanised estuary Implementing a streamlined management authority
324
consistent effort to understand the biophysical characteristics of Sydney Harbour and how the Sydney
325
community is impacting on natural resources by research and government agencies (Johnston et al.
326
2015, Mayer-Pinto et al. 2015, Banks et al. in review).
327
Coastal zone management, generally, is weakened by multiple governance frameworks (Bruns 2013)
328
due to ‘conflicting authorities, unclear or lack of responsibilities allocation, poor stakeholder
329
involvement/ commitment and lack of scientific knowledge’. To overcome this uncertainty in the
330
waters of New South Wales, the state Government established The Marine Estate Management
331
Authority (MEMA) under the Marine Estate Management Act 2014. The role of the Authority is to
332
advise the NSW Government on how to have ‘a healthy coast and sea, managed for the greatest
333
wellbeing of the community, now and into the future’ (p.3, MEMA 2013). Recently, MEMA initiated a
334
Sydney Harbour project to promote and facilitate information sharing and collaboration to support a
335
scientifically sound approach to management (http://www.marine.nsw.gov.au/key-initiatives/sydney-
336
harbour).
337
The MEMA currently has a toolbox of state and federal legislation such as the NSW Protection of the
338
Environment Operations Act 1997, the NSW Coastal Protection Act 1979 and the Environment
339
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Hedge et al. 2014a). Further, a new Marine Estate
340
Expert Knowledge Panel (MEEKP) provides MEMA with scientific advice. The main goal is to implement
341
an overarching plan for the management of the NSW marine estate, including Sydney Harbour, to
342
overcome the problems inherent in multiple agencies (Banks et al. in review). In 2015, MEMA
343
introduced a Threat and Risk Assessment Framework (TARA) for the NSW Marine Estate to manage
344
the confluence of intense human activity and natural biodiversity found in in the region (MEMA,
345
2015). The Framework will prioritise current threats, how they interact, whether they are cumulative
346
and prospects for remediation (NSW MEMA 2014).
347
The first step collates existing knowledge about the Harbour natural resources, in particular the
348
benefits provided to the community and the threats to those benefits. A series of reports and peer-
349
reviewed articles synthesised the current scientific knowledge. Secondly, MEMA sought to measure
350
community benefits by identifying the key economic, social and environmental benefits, and
351
perceived threats and opportunities derived from the estate via community consultation, expert input
352
and stakeholder surveys (MEMA, 2015). This work is on-going (MEMA 2014). The vision of MEMA for
353
Sydney Harbour and the NSW marine environment is ‘to have a healthy coast and sea, managed for
354
the greatest well-being of the community, now and into the future’ (www.marine.nsw.gov.au).
355
5.2
356
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to reside in greater Sydney with 29 clan groups 12
Recognising traditional owners
357
collectively referred to as the Eora Nation (Figure 5, Heiss and Gibson 2015). For them, the Sydney
358
landscape holds significant spiritual and religious importance (Heiss and Gibson 2015).
359 360
Figure 5: Map of locations of Aboriginal groups in the Sydney area in (Heiss and Gibson 2015) reproduced from
361
(Mulvaney and White 1987)
362
Today the City of Sydney acknowledges the Gadigal clan as the traditional custodians (City of Sydney
363
Accessed 03/07/15). Sydney and the Harbour surrounds have many fine rock engraving sites (for
364
example see Figure 2 and http://www.thegreatnorthwalk.com/rockart) and ancient Aboriginal sites
365
containing relics such as stone tools, and midden deposits (Heiss and Gibson 2015). The National Parks
366
and Wildlife Act 1974 and Heritage Act 1977 protect Aboriginal relics and sites, and natural and
367
cultural heritage (Heiss and Gibson 2015).
368
Tourism is identified as a way for indigenous groups to maintain their cultural values and for traditions
369
to be perpetuated (Sweeney Research 2014). Programs and initiatives aimed at supporting Aboriginal
370
tourism in the Harbour include the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Aboriginal
371
Discovery Program and the Indigenous Tourism Champions Program instigated by Tourism Australia
372
and Indigenous Business Australia. An example of a successful tourism company is the non-profit
373
Tribal Warrior (http://tribalwarrior.org/) that offers tourist charters on Sydney Harbour. Initiated and
374
directed by Aboriginal people, Aboriginal Elders work to empower young people by offering training
375
aboard the Tribal Warrior and the Mari Nawi vessels. 13
376
Indigenous people are critical stakeholders in coastal research with legally recognized ownership,
377
management, and cultural rights to the coastal zone (Bayliss 2015). The importance of increasing the
378
involvement of indigenous Australians in marine research and monitoring was highlighted in the 2016
379
National Marine Science Plan (National Marine Science Committee 2015). The Plan notes that
380
indigenous cultural connection to and knowledge of the ocean must be valued and used in strategies
381
to use and manage marine resources, including those of Sydney Harbour (National Marine Science
382
Committee 2015).
383
5.1
384
Many government organisations are increasingly reliant on community organisations to an
385
understanding of the marine environment and to help promote stewardship of local community
386
towards their environment (ABS 2010). In NSW, there are currently 4 local volunteer groups that focus
387
on monitoring the marine environment in Sydney Harbour (Dalton and Smith 2009) and 2 Australia
388
wide groups that include monitoring of this area.
389
Local groups:
Community involvement – citizen science
390
Underwater Research Group of NSW: http://www.urgdiveclub.org.au/
391
Underwater Sydney: http://www.underwatersydney.org/Activities.aspx
392
Eco divers: http://www.manlyaustralia.com.au/11366/eco-divers/
393
Harbour and coast keepers: http://www.landcareonline.com.au/?page_id=44
394
Australia wide groups:
395
Reef Life Survey: http://reeflifesurvey.com/
396
Red map: http://www.redmap.org.au/region/nsw/
397
These groups quantify marine biodiversity, identify threatened and introduced species, quantify and
398
remove marine debris, and identify changes in species ranges (Dalton and Smith 2009). The joint
399
benefits include, increased spatial and temporal coverage of data collection (e.g. Stuart-Smith et al.
400
2015) and increased personal satisfaction for volunteers through their contributions, feelings of
401
enjoyment and socialising (Koss and Kingsley 2010). Successful groups ensure regular training of
402
volunteers, data management, and online availability, social media exposure and funding. There is
403
considerable scope to expand and consulate the data collected by these groups for management and
404
monitoring purposes.
405
5.2
406
Sydney Harbour has been the focus of extensive research. The five major universities in the area all 14
Scientific research
407
have a strong interest understanding the threats and pressures to the marine environment. The
408
collaboration between University of Macquarie, University of New South Wales, University of Sydney,
409
and University of Technology lead to the formation of the Sydney Institute of Marine Science in 2009
410
and its associated Marine Discovery centre in 2015 (http://sims.org.au/).
411
There is a growing scientific interest in the Harbour and approximately 65% of the current research on
412
the harbour was published in the last 10 years (www.webofknowledge.com). The recent focus of
413
these publications has turned from understanding the effects of historical uses and impacts to
414
assessing solutions for these complex harbour problems such as use of green engineering techniques
415
(Chapman and Underwood 2009, Browne et al. 2015, Dafforn et al. 2015b) and implementation of
416
marine protected areas (Edgar and Stuart-Smith 2009). This research has sparked public interest
417
(Morris et al. 2016). Current research efforts are focused on developing management and policy
418
efforts targeted at addressing point pollution sources (Davies and Wright 2014)
419
(http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/beach/ar1415/FB5-sydney.pdf) and addressing the
420
multiple anthropogenic and climatic stressors (Mayer-Pinto et al. 2015) to improve the biodiversity of
421
this highly urbanised estuary .
422
6
423
Harbours are subject to sustained anthropogenic pressure that threatens their ecological, social and
424
economic value, as are many international harbours (for examples see Lin et al. 2004, Wang et al.
425
2007, Lepland et al. 2010, Taylor 2010, Xu et al. 2011, Hamzeh et al. 2013, Hamdoun et al. 2015,
426
Valdor et al. 2015). Sydney Harbour is no exception. Fortunately there is growing political and public
427
recognition of the unique value of the Harbour environment (Banks et al. in review) and an increased
428
desire to understand and protect its natural assets.
429
Environmental systems are not only a function of their biophysical dynamics, but are also strongly
430
influenced by social dynamics and this creates a coupled socio-ecological system (Young et al. 2006).
431
The resilience of a city through time depends on its ability to simultaneously maintain both its
432
ecosystem and its human functions (Alberti et al. 2003). It seems likely that the resilience of harbours
433
and their adjoining urban environments will similarly rely on managing both their natural and socio-
434
economic characteristics. Sydney Harbour shares many of the challenges related to urbanisation and
435
economic development faced by other international harbours featured in this Special Issue: multiple
436
users place demands on finite natural resources, managers, and policy architects struggle to
437
incorporate ecological, social, and economic demands into a coherent management package. One size
438
does not fit all when managing such complex systems, but the comparison of the challenges and
439
solutions in world harbours in this issue offers an important knowledge source and guidance in 15
Conclusion
440
achieving sustainable and resilient harbours.
441
Here we detail a first estimation of the values of Sydney Harbour (we have been unable to find any
442
other attempt at listing economic values of Sydney Harbour, and comparable international attempts
443
seem to be very few in number to date). Hoisington (2015) offers a framework for valuing a harbour
444
that residents and visitors use it in a variety of ways and on which the community places high social
445
and cultural value. The Marine Estate Management Authority will facilitate information sharing and
446
collaboration to support a scientifically sound approach to management within the Harbour. Their
447
ongoing Threat and Risk Assessment Framework project will greatly assist in the management of the
448
particular problems arising from the confluence of intense human activity and incredible natural
449
biodiversity. Importantly, the involvement of the community and indigenous groups will be vital to
450
ensure the equitable development and ongoing management of the iconic Sydney Harbour.
451
7
452
ABS. 2010. 4441.0 - Voluntary Work, Australia, 2010 in Australian Bureau of Statistics, editor.
453 454
ABS. 2013-14. Regional Population Growth, Australia. Cat. No. 3218.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/
[email protected]/mf/3218.0/.
455 456
AEC Group Ltd. 2013 Economic Impact Assessment of the Cruise Shipping Industry in Australia (201213).
457 458
Airoldi, L., and M. W. Beck. 2007. Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. An Annu. Rev. 45:345-405.
459 460 461
Alberti, M., J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, G. Bradley, C. Ryan, and C. Zumbrunnen. 2003. Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems. BioScience 53:1169-1179.
462 463 464
AMBS. 2002. Port Surveys For Introduced Marine Species Sydney Harbour Final Report. Australian Museum Business Services http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/54203/200511170000/portsurvey1.pdf.
465 466 467
Atkins, J. P., D. Burdon, M. Elliott, and A. J. Gregory. 2011. Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62:215-226.
468 469 470 471
Balmford, A., A. Bruner, P. Cooper, R. Costanza, S. Farber, R. E. Green, M. Jenkins, P. Jefferiss, V. Jessamy, J. Madden, K. Munro, N. Myers, S. Naeem, J. Paavola, M. Rayment, S. Rosendo, J. Roughgarden, K. Trumper, and R. K. Turner. 2002. Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature. Science 297:950-953.
472 473
Banks, J., P. Hutchings, B. Curley, L. Hedge, B. Creese, and E. Johnston. in review. Biodiversity conservation in Sydney Harbour Pacific Conservation Biology.
474 475
Barragán, J. M., and M. de Andrés. 2015. Analysis and trends of the world's coastal cities and agglomerations. Ocean & Coastal Management 114:11-20. 16
References
476 477 478
Beck, H., and G. F. Birch. 2012a. Metals, nutrients and total suspended solids discharged during different flow conditions in highly-urbanised catchments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:837-653.
479 480 481
Beck, H. J., and G. F. Birch. 2012b. Spatial and temporal variance of metal and suspended solids relationships in urban stormwater and implications for monitoring. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 223:1005-1015.
482 483 484
Birch, G. 2007. A short geological and environmental history of the Sydney estuary, Australia. Pages 217-246 in G. Birch, editor. Water, Wind, Art and Debate. Sydney University Press, The Sydney University.
485 486
Birch, G., J. Lean, and T. Gunns. 2015. Historic change in catchment land use and metal loading to Sydney estuary, Australia (1788-2010). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187:594.
487 488 489
Birch, G. F., and S. E. Taylor. 2000. The distribution and possible sources of organochlorine residues in sediments of a large urban estuary, Port Jackson, Sydney. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 47:749-756.
490 491 492
Blackwell, B. 2005. The ecoservice values for some of Australia’s natural coastal assets: How much are our coasts worth and what’s missing from the mosaic? ANZSEE conference -‘Re-inventing Sustainability: A climate for change', Noosaville, Queensland, Australia.
493 494 495
Browne, M. A., A. J. Underwood, M. G. Chapman, R. Williams, R. C. Thompson, and J. A. van Franeker. 2015. Linking effects of anthropogenic debris to ecological impacts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282: 20142929.
496 497 498
Bruns, A. 2013. The environmental impacts of megacities on the coast. Page 288 in M. Pelling and S. Blackburn, editors. Megacities and the Coast: Risk, Resilience and Transformation. Earthscan from Routledge
499 500 501
Burchett, M. D., A. Pulkownik, C. Grant, and G. Macfarlane. 1999. Rehabilitation of Saline Wetlands, Olympics 2000 Site, Sydney (Australia)—I: Management Strategies Based on Ecological Needs Assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37:515-525.
502 503 504
Bureau of Metereology. 2015. Summary statistics Sydney (Observatory Hill). Climate statistics for Australian locations: Monthly climate statistics. Bureau of Metereology, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml.
505 506
Chapman, M. G., and F. Bulleri. 2003. Intertidal seawalls - new features of landscape in intertidal environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 62:159-172.
507 508 509
Chapman, M. G., and A. J. Underwood. 2009. Comparative effects of urbanization in marine and terrestrial habitats. Pages 51-70 in M. J. McDonnell, A. K. Hahs, and J. H. Breuste, editors. Ecology of Cities and Towns: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.
510 511 512
Chariton, A. A., L. N. Court, D. M. Hartley, M. J. Colloff, and C. M. Hardy. 2010. Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA. Front Ecol Environ 8:233-238.
513 514
City of Sydney. 2014a. All-seeing eye's first glimpse of 2014. www.sydneynewyearseve.com/seeingeyes-first-glimpse-2014/.
515 516
City of Sydney. 2014b. Metropolitan Sydney - population. http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/learn/research-and-statistics/the-city-at-a17
517
glance/metropolitan-sydney, NSW.
518 519 520
Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, S. Naeem, K. Limburg, J. Paruelo, R. V. O’Neill, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. J. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
521 522 523
Costanza, R., R. de Groot, P. Sutton, S. van der Ploeg, S. J. Anderson, I. Kubiszewski, S. Farber, and R. K. Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26:152-158.
524 525 526
Costanza, R., I. Kubiszewski, D. Ervin, R. Bluffstone, J. Boyd, D. Brown, H. Chang, V. Dujon, E. Granek, S. Polasky, V. Shandas, and A. Yeakley. 2011. Valuing ecological systems and services. F1000 Biology Reports 3:14.
527 528
Creese, R., T. Glasby, G. West, and C. Gallen. 2009. Mapping the estuarine habitats of NSW. Nsw Fisheries Final Report Series 113:94.
529 530 531
Dafforn, K. A., T. M. Glasby, L. Airoldi, N. K. Rivero, M. Mayer-Pinto, and E. L. Johnston. 2015a. Marine urbanization: an ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13:82-90.
532 533 534
Dafforn, K. A., M. Mayer-Pinto, R. L. Morris, and N. J. Waltham. 2015b. Application of management tools to integrate ecological principles with the design of marine infrastructure. Journal of environmental management 158:61-73.
535 536 537
Dafforn, K. A., S. L. Simpson, B. P. Kelaher, G. F. Clark, V. Komyakova, C. K. C. Wong, and E. L. Johnston. 2012. The challenge of choosing environmental indicators of anthropogenic impacts in estuaries. Environmental Pollution 163:207-217.
538 539 540
Dalton, S. J., and S. D. A. Smith. 2009. A Review of Underwater Volunteer Groups in NSW. Report prepared for the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority, http://www.ozcoasts.gov.au/geom_geol/nsw/UnderwaterVolunteerGroups.pdf.
541 542
Das, P., P. Marchesiello, and J. H. Middleton. 2000. Numerical modelling of tide-induced residual circulation in Sydney Harbour. Marine and Freshwater Research 51:97-112.
543 544 545
Davies, P., and I. Wright. 2014. A review of policy, legal, land use and social change in the management of urban water resources in Sydney, Australia: A brief reflection of challenges and lessons from the last 200 years. Land Use Policy 36:450-460.
546 547 548
de Jonge, V. N., R. Pinto, and R. K. Turner. 2012. Integrating ecological, economic and social aspects to generate useful management information under the EU Directives' ‘ecosystem approach’. Ocean & Coastal Management 68:169-188.
549 550
Destination NSW. 2015. SydneyTourism Statistics - Snapshot year ending December 2012. http://www.destinationnsw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/sydney-ye-dec-14.pdf.
551 552 553 554
Dickinson, T., T. Male, and A. Zaidi. 2015. Incorporating Natural Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services in Federal Decision-Making. The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/10/07/incorporating-natural-infrastructure-andecosystem-services-federal-decision-making.
555 556 557
Dominion Consulting PL. 2003. Identifying the recreational fishing expenditure of Sydney’s recreational fishers and its economic and social importance in regional communities of NSW. NSW Fisheries, http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/151960/sydney18
558
survey.pdf.
559 560
Edgar, G. J., and R. D. Stuart-Smith. 2009. Ecological effects of marine protected areas on rocky reef communities-a continental-scale analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 388:51-62.
561 562
Fisher, B., and R. Kerry Turner. 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 141:1167-1169.
563 564
Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643-653.
565 566 567 568 569
Ghosn, D. L., A. S. Steffe, and J. J. Murphy. 2010. An assessment of the effort and catch of shore-based and boat-based recreational fishers in the Sydney Harbour estuary over the 2007/08 summer period. Industry and Investment, NSW, Fisheries Final Report Series No. 122, http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/545728/FFRS-122_Ghosn-et-al2010.pdf.
570 571 572
Glaser, M., and B. Glaeser. 2011. 11.02 - The Social Dimension of Social–Ecological Management. Pages 5-30 in E. Wolanski and D. McLusky, editors. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science. Academic Press, Waltham.
573 574 575 576 577
Guerry, A. D., S. Polasky, J. Lubchenco, R. Chaplin-Kramer, G. C. Daily, R. Griffin, M. Ruckelshaus, I. J. Bateman, A. Duraiappah, T. Elmqvist, M. W. Feldman, C. Folke, J. Hoekstra, P. M. Kareiva, B. L. Keeler, S. Li, E. McKenzie, Z. Ouyang, B. Reyers, T. H. Ricketts, J. Rockström, H. Tallis, and B. Vira. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:7348-7355.
578 579 580
Hamdoun, H., E. Van-Veen, B. Basset, M. Lemoine, J. Coggan, L. Leleyter, and F. Baraud. 2015. Characterization of harbor sediments from the English Channel: assessment of heavy metal enrichment, biological effect and mobility. Marine Pollution Bulletin 90:273-280.
581 582 583
Hamzeh, M. A., M. Shah-Hosseini, and A. Naderi Beni. 2013. Effect of fishing vessels on trace metal contamination in sediments of three harbors along Iranian Oman Sea coast. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185:1791-1807.
584 585 586
Heal, G. M., E. B. Barbier, K. J. Boyle, A. P. Covich, S. P. Gloss, C. H. Hershner, J. P. Hoehn, C. M. Pringle, S. Polasky, K. Segerson, and K. Shrader-Frechette. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision Making. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
587 588 589 590
Hedge, L., E. L. Johnston, S. T. Ahyong, G. F. Birch, D. J. Booth, R. G. Creese, M. A. Doblin, W. F. Figueira, P. E. Gribben, P. A. Hutchings, M. Mayer Pinto, E. M. Marzinelli, T. R. Pritchard, M. Roughan, and P. D. Steinberg. 2014a. Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science. Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia.
591 592 593
Hedge, L., J. Turnbull, C. Hoisington, and E. Johnston. 2014b. Sydney Harbour Background Report. Report prepared for NSW Department of Primary Industries by the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Insititute of Marine Science.
594 595
Heiss, A., and M.-J. Gibson. 2015. Aboriginal people and place. Sydney's Aboriginal History. Sydney Barani, City of Sydney, http://www.sydneybarani.com.au/sites/aboriginal-people-and-place/.
596 597 598
Hewitt, C. L., and R. B. Martin. 1996. Port surveys for introduced marine species - background considerations and sampling protocols. CSIRO Marine Research, http://acquire.cqu.edu.au:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/cqu:9500. 19
599
Hoisington, C. 2015. Our Harbour, Our Asset. Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia.
600
Hoskins, I. 2009. Sydney Harbour - A history. UNSW Press
601 602
Hughes, L. 2003. Climate change and Australia: Trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecology 28:423-443.
603 604
Hutchings, P., S. T. Ahyong, M. B. Ashcroft, M. A. McGrouther, and A. L. Reid. 2013. Sydney Harbour: its diverse biodiversity. Australian Zoologist 36:255-320.
605 606 607 608
Johnston, E. L., M. Mayer-Pinto, P. Hutchings, E. M. Marzinelli, S. T. Ahyong, G. Birch, D. Booth, R. Creese, M. A. Doblin, W. Figueira, P. E. Gribben, T. Pritchard, M. Roughan, P. D. Steinberg, and L. H. Hedge. 2015. Sydney Harbour: What we do and don't know about a mega-diverse estuary. Marine and Freshwater Research 66:1073-1087.
609 610
Jones-Walters, L., and I. Mulder. 2009. Valuing nature: The economics of biodiversity. Journal for Nature Conservation 17:245-247.
611 612
Koss, R. S., and J. Y. Kingsley. 2010. Volunteer health and emotional wellbeing in marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management 53:447-453.
613 614 615
Lafferty, K. D., C. D. Harvell, J. M. Conrad, C. S. Friedman, M. L. Kent, A. M. Kuris, E. N. Powell, D. Rondeau, and S. M. Saksida. 2015. Infectious Diseases Affect Marine Fisheries and Aquaculture Economics. Annual Review of Marine Science 7:471-496.
616 617 618
Lee, S., B., and G. F. Birch. 2012. Utilising monitoring and modelling of estuarine environments to investigate catchment conditions responsible for stratification events in a typically well-mixed urbanised estuary. Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 111:1-6.
619 620 621
Lee, S. B., G. F. Birch, and C. Lemckert. 2011. Field and modelling investigations of fresh-water plume behaviour in response to infrequent high-precipitation events, Sydney Estuary, Australia. Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 92:380-402.
622 623
Lehtonen, M. 2004. The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics 49:199-214.
624 625 626
Lepland, A., T. J. Andersen, A. Lepland, H. P. H. Arp, E. Alve, G. D. Breedveld, and A. Rindby. 2010. Sedimentation and chronology of heavy metal pollution in Oslo harbor, Norway. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60:1512-1522.
627 628 629
Li, R., Y. Li, M. van den Brink, and J. Woltjer. 2015. The capacities of institutions for the integration of ecosystem services in coastal strategic planning: The case of Jiaozhou Bay. Ocean & Coastal Management 107:1-15.
630 631
Lin, J., H. V. Wang, G. M. Sisson, and R. Shen. 2004. Toxic modeling in an industrial harbor - A case study for Baltimore Harbor.
632 633 634
Liu, S., R. Costanza, A. Troy, J. D’Aagostino, and W. Mates. 2010. Valuing New Jersey’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: A Spatially Explicit Benefit Transfer Approach. Environmental Management 45:1271-1285.
635 636 637
Luisetti, T., R. K. Turner, I. J. Bateman, S. Morse-Jones, C. Adams, and L. Fonseca. 2011. Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England. Ocean & Coastal Management 54:212-224. 20
638 639 640
Maritime Management Centre. 2013. Sydney Harbour Boat Storage Strategy. NSW Government, http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/b2b/publications/sydney-harbour-boatstorage-strategy.pdf.
641 642 643
Marre, J.-B., O. Thebaud, S. Pascoe, S. Jennings, J. Boncoeur, and L. Coglan. 2015. The use of ecosystem services valuation in Australian coastal zone management. Marine Policy 56:117124.
644 645 646 647 648
Mayer-Pinto, M., E. L. Johnston, P. Hutchings, E. M. Marzinelli, G. Birch, D. Booth, R. G. Creese, M. A. Doblin, W. Figueira, P. E. Gribben, T. Pritchard, M. Roughan, S. Ahyong, P. D. Steinberg, and L. H. Hedge. 2015. Sydney Harbour: A review of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and ecosystem function of one of the world’s largest natural harbours Marine and Freshwater Research 66:1088-1105.
649 650
Mayer, F. S., and C. M. Frantz. 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:503-515.
651 652 653
McCready, S., D. J. Slee, G. F. Birch, and S. E. Taylor. 2000. The Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surficial Sediments of Sydney Harbour, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40:999-1006.
654 655 656
McCready, S., G. Spyrakis, C. R. Greely, G. F. Birch, and E. R. Long. 2004. Toxicity of Surficial Sediments from Sydney Harbour and Vicinity, Australia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 96:53-83.
657 658 659 660 661
McIlgorm, A., and J. Pepperell. 2013 Developing a cost effective state wide expenditure survey method to measure the economic contribution of the recreational fishing sector in NSW in 2012. A report to the NSW Recreational Fishing Trust, NSW Department of Primary Industries. Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS), University of Wollongong.
662 663 664 665
MEMA. 2013. Managing the NSW Marine Estate: Purpose, Underpinning Principles and Priority Setting. Marine Estate Management Authority, http://www.marine.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/498604/Managing-MarineEstate.pdf.
666 667
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
668 669
Millennium Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Island Press, Washington, DC.
670 671 672
Morris, R. L., G. Deavin, S. Hemelryk Donald, and R. A. Coleman. 2016. Eco-engineering in urbanised coastal systems: consideration of social values. Ecological Management & Restoration 17:3339.
673 674
National Marine Science Committee. 2015. National Marine Science Plan 2015-2025: Driving the development of Australia’s blue economy. http://www.marinescience.net.au/.
675 676 677 678
Olsen, S. B., J. G. Sutinen, L. Juda, T. M. Hennessey, and T. A. Grigalunas. 2006. A Handbook on Governance and Socioeconomics of Large Marine Ecosystems, http://www.unep.org/regionalseas/publications/otherpubs/pdfs/lme_gov_handbook.pdf. University of Rhode Island. 21
679 680 681
OzCoasts. 2015. The benthic environments of Sydney Harbour, New South Wales. Australian Online Coastal Information. Geoscience Australia, http://www.ozcoasts.gov.au/geom_geol/case_studies/sydney_final_report.jsp.
682 683 684
Pelosi, J. P. 2014. Top 5 most expensive suburbs in Australia for houses. My Wealth News. Commonwealth Bank, https://www.mywealth.commbank.com.au/property/top-5-mostexpensive-suburbs-in-australia-for-houses-news20140923.
685 686
Pleasant, M. M., S. A. Gray, C. Lepczyk, A. Fernandes, N. Hunter, and D. Ford. 2014. Managing cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 8:141-147.
687 688
Port Authority of New South Wales. 2016. Port Facilities: Glebe Island and White Bay. http://www.sydneyports.com.au/corporation/port_facilities/glebe_island__and__white_bay.
689 690
Roy, P. S. 1984. New South Wales estuaries - their origin and evolution. Pages 99-121 in B. G. Thom, editor. Developments in Coastal Geomorphology in Australia. Academic Press, New York.
691 692 693
Roy, P. S., R. J. Williams, A. R. Jones, I. Yassini, P. J. Gibbs, B. Coates, R. J. West, P. R. Scanes, J. P. Hudson, and S. Nichol. 2001. Structure and Function of South-east Australian Estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53:351-384.
694 695 696 697
Ruckelshaus, M., E. McKenzie, H. Tallis, A. Guerry, G. Daily, P. Kareiva, S. Polasky, T. Ricketts, N. Bhagabati, S. A. Wood, and J. Bernhardt. 2015. Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics 115:11-21.
698 699 700
Sweeney Research. 2014. Marine Estate Community Survey Final Report. http://www.marine.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/531519/marine-estatecommunity-survey-report-minus-appendices.pdf.
701 702 703
Sydney Ferries. 2012. Annual Report 2011-12. Transport, NSW Government, http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/b2b/publications/annual_reports/sydne y-ferries-annual-report-2012.pdf.
704 705 706
Sydney Ports. Accessed 05.04.16. Evolution of Botany the Port. http://www.sydneyports.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/1188/Centenary_book_Chapte r_4.pdf.
707 708 709
Sydney Ports Corporation. 2014. Annual Report 2013/14. http://www.sydneyports.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/31473/Sydney_Ports_Corporat ion_Annual_Report_2013-14_FINAL_-Approved_27_October_2014.pdf.
710 711
Taylor, D. I. 2010. The Boston Harbor Project, and large decreases in loadings of eutrophicationrelated materials to Boston Harbor. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60:609-619.
712 713 714
Thomsen, S. 2014. MAKE IT VIVID MONTH: Why Sydney's Amazing Light Festival Needs To Last Twice As Long. Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com.au/make-it-vivid-month-whysydneys-amazing-light-festival-needs-to-last-twice-as-long-2014-6.
715 716 717
Tourism Australia. 2013. Sydney Harbour National Landscape - Experience Development Strategy. National Parks and Wildlife Services and Ecotourism Australia, http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/parksecopass/grants-sydney-harbour.pdf.
718 719
Valdor, P. F., A. G. Gómez, and A. Puente. 2015. Environmental risk analysis of oil handling facilities in port areas. Application to Tarragona harbor (NE Spain). Marine Pollution Bulletin 90:78-87. 22
720 721
van den Belt, M. 2011. 12.01 - Ecological Economics of Estuaries and Coasts. Pages 1-14 in E. Wolanski and D. McLusky, editors. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science. Academic Press, Waltham.
722 723 724 725
Vergés, A., P. D. Steinberg, M. E. Hay, A. G. B. Poore, A. H. Campbell, E. Ballesteros, and S. K. Wilson. 2014. The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. . Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1789), 20140846. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0846.
726 727 728
Vining, J., M. S. Merrick, and E. A. Price. 2008. The Distinction between Humans and Nature: Human Perceptions of Connectedness to Nature and Elements of the Natural and Unnatural. Research in Human Ecology 15:1-11.
729 730
Walsh, G. P. 1962. The geography of manufacturing in Sydney, 1788-1851. Business Archives and History 3:21-28.
731 732
Wang, X. C., H. Feng, and H. Q. Ma. 2007. Assessment of metal contamination in surface sediments of Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao, China. Clean-Soil Air Water 35:62-70.
733 734 735
Xu, J., J. H. W. Lee, K. Yin, H. Liu, and P. J. Harrison. 2011. Environmental response to sewage treatment strategies: Hong Kong’s experience in long term water quality monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62:2275-2287.
736 737 738
Young, O. R., F. Berkhout, G. C. Gallopin, M. A. Janssen, E. Ostrom, and S. van der Leeuw. 2006. The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change 16:304-316.
739
23