Biological Psychology
28 (1989)
123-133
123
North-Holland
SYMPATHETIC-PARASYMPATHETIC MEDIATION OF THE CARDIAC DEFENSE RESPONSE IN HUMANS Maria
Carmen
Accepted
FERNANDEZ
of Psychology,
Department
for publication
This paper reports mediation
of
response
(CDR)
Thirteen 400-Hz
the
decelerative first
an investigation
replicated
in alternating
in the second a description
components
rate
underwent
two components
support
1988
which examined
response cardiac
period (CP)
a physiological
sequence.
the changes
and pulse transit
reaction
and/or
stimulation
-
pattern
CP
in CP and PTT
and interpretation
of the CDR
with both vagal and sympathetic
and
decelerative moved
PTT
of a distorted
The results
regarding
two accelerative
changes
components in opposite
defense
simultaneously.
test with a single presentation
with four components:
As regards and second
parasympathetic
the cardiac
time (PTT)
rise time and 0.5 s duration.
the typical
accelerative
the sympathetic
to intense’auditory
of 109 dB, instantaneous
form of the CDR occurred
1 December
heart
VILA
Unruersity of Granada, 1801 I Granada, Spam
- by recording
subjects sound
and Jaime
*
the only
coincidences
of the response. directions.
in terms of both accelerative
the
and two
These
In the results
and decelerative
mediation.
1. Introduction Research into the physiological significance of the defence response - also called defense reaction or defense reflex ~ has been greatly influenced by Cannon’s relevance
classical studies on the fight-flight response and by the special attributed by him to the role of the sympathetic branch of the
autonomic nervous system in all emotional and motivational states (Cannon, 1929). The description and physiological interpretation of the defense response put forward by Cannon investigated
have received support
it by means
of the electrical
defense area in animals (Abrahams, Lisander, 1970). From a descriptive
mainly from studies which have
stimulation
of the hypothalamic
Hilton, & Zbrozyna, 1960; Bard, 1960; point of view, the cardiovascular compo-
nents of the defense response include an increase in cardiac activity (positive chronotropic and inotropic effects) and an increase in the volume of blood * This research **
was supported
Scientific
and Technological
Requests
for reprints
Personalidad, B), Universidad
0301-0511/89/$3.50
be addressed 18011
Elsevier
from the Spanish
Consulting
Committee
for
Departamento
de
(CAICYT).
y Tratamiento
de Granada.
0 1989,
PR82-1933
Research
should
Evaluaci6n
by grant
to: Maria
Psicolhgico,
Granada,
Science
Carmen Facultad
Fernlndez, de Filosofia
Spain.
Publishers
B.V. (North-Holland)
y Letras
(Edificio
124
M.C. Ferndnder
and J. Vda / Cardux
defense
response
in humans
supply to the skeletal muscles, accompanied by a decrease in blood supply to the skin and viscera. It is assumed that such reactions are mediated by an increment in sympathetic activation through both neural pathways (stimulation of the sympathetic nerve fibres to the heart and blood vessels) and humoral pathways (increment in circulating catecholamines secreted by the adrenal medulla). This interpretation rules out vagal influences and, in particular, the baroreceptor reflex in the mediation of the defense response (Lisander, 1970). From this point of view, it would seem contradictory to consider the cardiac defense response (CDR) as a pattern of heart rate (HR) changes with both
accelerative
and
decelerative
pathetic
mediation.
However,
auditory
and electrocutaneous
components
descriptive stimulation
those
and duration
of other
intense auditory 1984; Pegalajar,
(Fernandez,
investigators
who have
both
unequivocally
plex response pattern with four components decelerative - in alternating order and perfectly tude, latency
and
vagal
and
data on the HR response demonstrate
- two accelerative defined parameters
1986). These data confirm studied
the CDR
sym-
to intense a comand two of ampliand extend
in humans
using
stimulation (Eves & Gruzelier, 1984, 1985; Knott & Bulmer, 1986; Turpin & Siddle, 1978, 1980, 1981, 1983) and they are
very similar to those obtained by Bond (1943) who investigated emotional responses in unanaesthetized dogs and cats using the same paradigm (short unexpected intense noise). Research into the physiological significance of this response pattern has been carried out using different methodological strategies. Bond (1943) examined it in animals by differential extirpation of the sympathetic-vagal nerves and the adrenal glands and discovered an important sympathetic-vagal interaction
in the elicitation
been focused
on the second
of the response accelerative
1986; Turpin & Siddle, 1978, activation the T-wave amplitude differential
of the carotid
pattern.
component
In humans,
research
of the response
has
(Turpin,
1981). Using as a measure of sympathetic of the ECG, forearm blood flow and the first
pulse (dP/dt),
Turpin
and Siddle have offered
data
which point towards a P-adrenergic interpretation of the second acceleration. Interpretation of the other accelerative and decelerative components has not been attempted directly, although Turpin’s data (Turpin, 1986) would appear to indicate a non-sympathetic mediation of the first acceleration. However, in agreement with Cannon’s proposal on the non-participation of the parasympathetic nervous system in emotions and with the results of studies on electrical stimulation of the hypothalamic defence area, Turpin (1986) identifies the cardiac defense response exclusively with the second accelerative component. Nevertheless, both the assumption of the non-participation of the parasympathetic nervous system in emotions and the definition of the defense response as described in studies on electrical stimulation of the hypothalamic defense
area are questionable
from several points
of view.
125
M.C. Fernrindez and .I. Vila / Cardiac defense response in humans
The
involvement
of the parasympathetic
nervous
system
in stress
and
emotions has been clearly demonstrated 1985, for a review). Vagal predominance
by numerous authors (see Vingerhoets, may form part of a complex response
pattern to some stressors characterized nied by fainting, bradycardia and/or
by enhanced vagal activity, accompaarrythmias (Vingerhoets, 1984, 1985).
Grossman and Svebak (1987) have also reported parasympathetic effects and sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions in stressor tasks, finding exaggerated HR responses associated with extreme parasympathetic withdrawal. On the other hand, the definition of the defense response with reference to the response components elicited by the electrical stimulation of a cerebral “area”
or “centre”
a localizationist vascular
has two important
limitations.
vision of the functioning
reactions
are known
organized
longitudinally
Provoots,
& Shapiro,
to form
throughout 1977;
part
system, when cardio-
of integrated
the central
Gellman,
In the first place, it assumes
of the nervous
nervous
Schneiderman,
response system
Wallach,
patterns (De
Jong,
& Le Blanc,
1981; Hilton, 1975; Larsen, Schneiderman, & De Carlo Pasin, 1986). Secondly, it directs the criterion for the definition of the defense response towards the efferent
components
of the response
itself, neglecting
the situational
context
in
which it is elicited. Cannon stressed the link between the fight-flight reaction and the demands of the situation to which the organism responds in an attempt to adapt itself. Moreover, researchers strongly influenced by Cannon have
preferred to study the defense response in the context of natural situations rather than use electrical stimulation of specific brain centres (Adams, Baccelli, Mancia, & Zanchetti, 1971; Bond, 1943). Under such conditions and in clear contrast to the studies on electrical stimulation (Lisander, 1970), the above-mentioned investigators did encounter accelerative and decelerative changes in HR with both sympathetic and vagal influences. The aim of the present investigation was to examine the sympathetic and/or parasympathetic mediation of the accelerative and decelerative components of the CDR described in previous studies (Fernandez, 1986) by adequately evoking the four-component CDR pattern and by recording cardiac period (CP) and pulse transit time (PTT) simultaneously. As mentioned above, previous work on the autonomic mediation of the HR response to intense stimulation in humans has been limited to the examination of the first and second accelerative components, no mention being made of the two decelerative ones. Progress in the understanding of the physiological significance of the CDR requires, firstly, a precise description of the response pattern itself on which to base further research and, secondly, an accurate analysis of the parametric characteristics of the eliciting stimulus, namely, sensory modality and intensity. The present study takes into consideration the results of a recent descriptive and parametric investigation (Fernandez, 1986) in order to evoke and describe the CDR pattern adequately. AS regards the dependent variable, PTT has been considered as an indirect
126
M. C. Ferminder
and J. Vda / Cardiac
defense
response
m humans
measure of ventricular contractility and, therefore, as a psychophysiological index of P-adrenergic influences on myocardiac performance (Obrist, Light, McCubbin, Hutcheson, & Hoffer, 1979). Consequently, we would expect the recording of PTT during the elicitation of the CDR to permit us to determine whether its specific HR components correspond exclusively to sympathetic mediation, as has been traditionally postulated. Although the problem of preference among different indirect indices of sympathetic activation - namely T-wave and P’IT - is still a controversial issue (Furedy, Heslegrave, & Scher, 1984; Larsen et al., 1986; Schwartz & Weiss, 1983) our choice of PTT has been based not on superiority but on the fact that PTT is one of the few relevant indices which has not been investigated so far in relation to the CDR. The choice
of this index would provide
allow us to compare using T-wave Siddle,
PTT
amplitude,
carotid
d P/dt
1978, 1981). Such a comparison
contractility-based
new evidence
and, at the same time,
results with those obtained
sympathetic
indices,
by earlier investigators
and forearm
blood
is indeed relevant for example
flow (Turpin
&
since PTT, like other
carotid
dP/dt,
may not
be a perfect index of sympathetic activation (Heslegrave & Furedy, 1980; Obrist & Light, 1980). Therefore final interpretation of PTT results should take into consideration the presence or absence of convergent data from previous
studies.
2. Method 2. I. Subjects The subjects were 13 male volunteers; students from the University of Granada subjects receiving
had no cardiovascular psychiatric
disorders
or pharmacological
all were final-year psychology aged between 23 and 26. The
or auditory
deficiencies
and were not
treatment.
2.2. Apparatus A lafayett polygraph was used to monitor HR and pulse amplitude through the LA-76403 cardiotachometer and the LA-76405 pulse amplifier. Both amplifiers received the same input signal provided by a Letica TRU-030 photoelectric plethysmograph, placed on the distal phalanx of the left index finger. The recording of pulse amplitude in this case was done exclusively to control possible artifacts in the cardiotachometer resulting from the use of the photoplethysmograph to activate the cardiotachometer. By simultaneously recording HR and pulse amplitude we were able to control the cardiotachometer trigger level, as well as detect or correct possible artifacts due to double trigger or loss of trigger. The cardiotachometer
amplifier
monitored
HR within
M. C. Fernlinda
and J. Vila / Cardiac defense response m humans
127
a range of 40-120 beats/mm, the cardiotachometer being calibrated before and after each subject. The recording was carried out at a paper speed of 2.5 mm/s. A Leti-Graph 2000 polygraph was used to measure PTI by monitoring the ECG and the pulse amplitude through HSC-400 and CAR-300 amplifiers. The HSC-400 monitored ECG in the lead II configuration using silver-plated electrodes. The CAR-300 amplifier monitored pulse amplitude through a Letica TRU-030 photoelectric plethysmograph, placed on the distal phalanx of the right index finger. The ECG and pulse amplitude recordings were carried out by means of thermic pens on thermosensitive paper at a speed of 100 mm/s. A Letica LE-150 auditory stimulator was used to produce a distorted 400-Hz sound of 109 dB, virtually instantaneous rise time and a duration of 0.5 s. The sounds were presented through SUNSE-20 headphones. The sound pressure level of the stimulus was measured by a Briiel and Kjaer SPL meter using scale A. A Letica LE-100 stimulus programmer, comprising ten independent timers, was used to monitor the sequence and duration of the stimulus and to mark its beginning and end on the polygraph. 2.3. Procedure All subjects underwent a physiological reaction test designed to evoke the CDR following the methodological recommendations derived from previous descriptive and parametric studies (Fernandez, 1986). This consisted of a single presentation of a high-intensity auditory stimulus of 109 dB and 0.5 s duration in the following sequence: (a) lo-min adaptation period; (b) the auditory stimulus presentation; (c) 80-s post-stimulus period. During the test the physiological measures described in section 2.2 were recorded. The tests for all subjects were carried out in the afternoon in the laboratory, which consisted of two sound-attenuated rooms: the subject’s room and the experimenter’s room. The first was a 3 x 3 X 3m room with controlled temperature between 20 o C and 23’ C. On arrival at the laboratory, the subject sat at a desk and was given general information about the session and completed a personal questionnaire with information relevant to the selection criteria. The subject then sat down in an armchair and the instructions for the physiological reaction test were read to him. These described the test as a routine procedure to examine the effect of sound on relaxation. The instructions requested the subject to remain still throughout the test and try to breathe as normally and evenly as possible. Then the experimenter placed the items of apparatus on the subject in the following order: the headphones, the ECG electrodes, the Leti-Graph plethysmograph and the Lafayett plethysmograph. During the test, the experimenter left the subject’s room and turned down the lighting to a
128
M. C. Ferncinder and J. Vda / Curdmc defense response m humans
pre-established
subdued
level.
Once
the
test
returned to the subject’s room, removed the plethysmographs and concluded the session.
was
over,
the
headphones,
experimenter
electrodes
and
2.4. Data analysis 2.4. I. Cardiac defence response Descriptive and
followed
analysis the
of the CDR
was done in terms of CP instead
methodological
recommendations
derived
from
of HR previous
studies (Fernandez, 1986). Accordingly, the response was defined as the second-by-second CP during the 60 s after stimulus onset expressed in terms of differential
scores with respect
the 15 s prior
to stimulus
onset
to the average second-by-second (baseline).
The
second-by-second
CP during CP was
calculated from the recordings provided by the cardiotachometer at the very end of each second withoug weighting for partial inter-beat intervals. Then the 60 CP values were reduced progressively longer intervals: 446) the next interval of of 7 s (seconds 12-18, Finally, the 10 medians reduction of the 60 CP allowed us to apply the variance
without distorting
to 10 corresponding the first two intervals
to the medians of 10 of 3 s (seconds l-3 and
5 s (seconds 7-11) and the following seven intervals 19-25, 26632, 33339, 40-46, 47753 and 54-60). for each subject were converted into Z-scores. The values to 10 using progressively longer intervals trend analysis of the CP changes using analysis of the shape of the CDR
pattern.
On the other hand,
the use of medians instead of means permitted us to exclude extreme values which might not truly represent the temporal
the influence of sequence of the
cardiac
direct
changes.
Finally,
the Z-score
transformation
allowed
compari-
son of the CP and the PTT values. 2.4.2. Pulse Transit Time This was defined as the interval in milliseconds between the peak (first point of maximum amplitude) of the R-wave of the ECG and the peak of the finger pulse wave associated with the same cardiac contraction. Analysis of the PTT was carried out following the same method applied to the CDR. PTT was measured during the 15 s prior to and the 60 s following stimulus onset. These data were converted into second-by-second PTT, by selecting the PTT of the nearest R-wave to each second. The response was then defined as the secondby-second PTT during the 60 s after stimulus onset expressed in terms of differential scores with respect to the average second-by-second PTT during the 15 s prior to stimulus onset (baseline). The 60 PTT values were reduced to 10 corresponding to the medians of the same 10 intervals as selected in the case of CP. Finally, these 10 values for each subject were converted into Z-scores.
129
M. C. Ferncinder and .I. Vila / Cardiac defense response in humans
3. Results Fig. 1 shows the cardiac response to the auditory stimulus expressed in raw CP values. The negative scores indicate HR acceleration while the positive scores indicate HR deceleration, The form of the response replicates the typical CDR pattern described in previous studies (FernLndez, 1986) with its four components, quence.
two accelerative
Fig. 2 shows the PTT values.
The negative
increment
in PIT.
coincides
and
response
scores
to the auditory
indicate
a decrement
As may be observed
temporarily
two decelerative,
in alternating
stimulus
an intial increase
with the first accelerative
expressed
and the positive
in raw
scores
is produced
component
se-
of the CDR.
an
which This
9 ;;;il
li SECONDS
Fig.
1. Cardiac
(Numbers
2
period
4 1; SECONDS
Fig.
2’9
2. Pulse
transit
3’6
STIMULUS
response
on the horizontal
iii
(Numbers
2; FROM
5b ONSET
to
the
axis represent
i2 FROM
2’9 ;6 STIMULUS
time
response
on the horizontal
L’3
;3
5’7
intense
5b ONSET
stimulus
expressed
of the 10 selected
in
raw
values.
intervals.)
5?,
to the intense
axis represent
auditory
the midpoints
auditory
the midpoints
stimulus
expressed
of the 10 selected
in raw values.
intervals.)
M. C. Ferminder and J. Vila / Cardrac defense response in humans
130
-I 00
bi
<
i
1’5
SECONDS
Fig. 3. Cardiac expressed
A? FROM
i6
i9
L13
STIMULUS
io
period (CP) and Pulse transit
in Z-scores.
(Numbers
517
ONSET
time (P’IT)
on the horizontal
response
axis represent
to the intense
auditory
the midpoints
of the 10 selected
stimulus
intervals.)
increase in PTT is immediately reaches its maximum decremental
followed by a progressive decrease point coinciding with the maximum
tude of the second accelerative HR component. towards the baseline is observed, coinciding component of the cardiac response.
which ampli-
Finally, a progressive recovery with the second decelerative
A (2 x 10 X s) ANOVA, the first factor being the type of physiological variable (CP versus PTT) and the second being the form of the response (10 medians),
both
factors
of repeated
measures,
was carried
out on the trans-
formed CP and PTT values. The results showed a significant main effect of the form factor, F(9,lOS) = 9.14, p < .OOl, and a significant effect of the type X form interaction, easily interpreted of their
response.
F(9,108)
= 8.82,
p < .OOl. The
by fig. 3. The two physiological Statistical
analysis
of the form
significant variables
interaction
is
differ in the form
of the response
for each
variable shows that, while CP has significant effects of the linear, F(1,12) = 12.20, p < .Ol, and cubic, F(1,12) = 13.06, p < .Ol, trends, PTT has significant effects of the quadratic F(1,12) = 51.82, p < .OOl, and cubic, F(1,12) = 12.48, p < .Ol, trends. On the other hand, the significant differences between the two variables are seen only in medians 1, F(1,12) = 65.98, p < .OOl, 3, F(1,12) = 10.32, p < .Ol, and 4, F(1,12) = 11.39, p -C .Ol, corresponding to the first accelerative and first decelerative component of the CDR. No significant differences are observed in the rest of the medians, the F values being especially
low from medians
5 to 10.
4. Discussion The results regarding CP confirm previous studies. As far as the PTT
the typical CDR pattern described in results are concerned, the data clearly
131
M. C. Fermindez and J. Vila / Cardiac defense response in humans
indicate
that the only coincidences
between
the CP and the PTT changes
occur
in the second accelerative and second decelerative components of the cardiac response. In the two first components, the changes in CP and PTT move in opposite directions. Consequently, assuming ergic influences on the heart, our results acceleration
and second deceleration
tion, the first acceleration
that PTT does reflect P-adrensuggest that while the second
may be explained
and the first deceleration
by sympathetic
cannot
media-
be explained
in the
same way. Moreover, taking into account the temporal sequence of the PTT changes, the sympathetic influences begin temporarily a few seconds before the initiation the presence
of the second cardiac acceleration, from which we may deduce of a vagally mediated inhibitory effect on the HR which dis-
sipates
a few seconds
after
acceleration. Our results
regarding
to allow
the full onset
the autonomic
mediation
of the second of the first
cardiac
and
second
acceleration bear out those obtained by Turpin and Siddle, who used as a measure of sympathetic activation the T-wave amplitude of the ECG (Turpin & Siddle, 1978), forearm blood flow (Turpin & Siddle, 1981) and the carotid d P/dt (Turpin & Siddle, 1981). Interestingly, Turpin and Siddle’s results regarding these sympathetic indices are remarkably similar to those observed in PTT, suggesting that there is a phasic decrease in sympathetic activation at the beginning of the CDR (first acceleration) and an increase in sympathetic activation
during the second acceleration.
the results of a discriminant applied to the differentiation the second accelerative tive component. higher
number
analysis between
component)
In the typical of non-specific
Our data are equally consistent (Fernandez, the typical
and a pattern
CDR
pattern,
skin resistance
with
Robles, & Vila, in press) CDR pattern (presence of without the second accelera-
greater
vasoconstriction
responses
were observed
and a pre-
cisely during the second acceleration. Consequently, convergent data from different autonomic indices seem to support the interpretation of the cardiac measures employed in the present study. Our data do not provide information as to the possible
mechanism
of the
sympathetic control of the second cardiac acceleration. Sympathetic control may be produced both at a neural level (direct influence on the heart) and at a humoral level (indirect influence through catecholamine production). Bond’s research with animals (Bond, 1943) suggests sympathetic adrenal medullary mediation of the second acceleration and clear vagal mediation of the first deceleration. The vagal mediation of the first deceleration is consistent with the results of the present investigation, which also point towards parasympathetic inhibition as a possible cause of the first acceleration.Thus, our results suggest the presence of important vagal and sympathetic influences in the cardiac defense response. The first two components seem to be controlled vagally whereas the final two components appear to be controlled sympathetically. Furthermore, the alternating pattern of the accelerative and the decelera-
132
M. C. Fermindez
and J. Vila / Cardmc
defense
response
in humans
tive components and the almost perfect coincidence of the amplitudes of the accelerative components, on the one hand, and the decelerative components, on the other, suggest the presence of compensatory homeostatic mechanisms within the cardiovascular system as a whole, although this hypothesis needs further empirical support. The description and interpretation of the CDR supported by our data are contrary
to the traditional
exclusively electrical
view of the defense
on the results stimulation
of studies
which
of the hypothalamic
the unidirectionality
response,
defense
of the HR changes
which is based almost
investigated
it by means
of the
area in animals and assumes
(acceleration)
and its exclusive
sym-
pathetic mediation. However, the results of more behavioral and naturalistic studies on the defense response in animals (Adams et al., 1971; Bond, 1943) as well as on the stress response in general William, & Shapiro, 1982; Vingerhoets,
(Grossman & Svebak, 1987; Surwitt, 1985) are not at all contrary to but
coherent with a description and interpretation of the cardiac as the one proposed here, in terms of both accelerative components
and both vagal and sympathetic
defense response, and decelerative
mediation.
References Abrahams,
V.C.,
stimulation
Hilton,
S.M., & Zbrozyna,
of the brain
stem:
A. (1960).
Its significance
Active
muscle
in the defense
vasodilatation
reaction.
produced
Journal
by
of Physiology,
154, 497LS13. Adams,
D.B.,
Baccelli,
in fighting Bard,
G., Mancia,
to emotion
P. (1960).
Anatomical
D.D.
(1943).
America1
Journal
Cannon, De
Sympathetic
W.B. (1929).
Jong,
Bodily
W.,
Provoots,
hypertension:
Progress
Eves,
F.F.,
Eves,
auditory
F.F.,
In
J.F.
cardiooascular FernBndez,
M.C.,
coronaries. Furedy, of
J.J.,
Science,
(1985). G.
nervous
system
in emotional
in relation
response
hunger, fear and rage. A.P.
(Eds.),
Amsterdam:
Individual
(1977).
to control
of
the
heart
rate.
York:
New
Appleton.
The
nervous
system
in artrriai
in the
cardiac
response
to high
21, 342-352. differences
& L.J.P.
New York: cardiaca
in the cardiac
van
Doornen
Plenum
Press.
de defensa
(Eds.),
en humanos.
response
to novel
Psychophysiology Rev&a
of
de Psrcologia
H., & Vila, J. (in press).
Aspectos
psicofisiol6gicos
de 10s trastornos
de Psicologia. R.J.,
amplitude
& Scher,
in the
H. (1984).
objective
study
Psychophysiological of
behavior.
and physiological
Paulouian
Journal
aspects
of Biological
19, 182-194. Schneiderman,
elicited
of
Elsevier.
differences
Individual
Mulder,
La respuesta
Robles,
Heslegrave,
M.D.,
responses Journal
changes
41, 827-836.
Boletin
T-wave
Gellman,
(1986).
y Aplicada,
FernPndez,
J.H.
of cardiovascular
40, 3-26.
Psychophysiology,
(pp. 637-648).
control
M.C.
General
in pain,
(1984).
stimulation. Orlebeke,
Review,
interaction
& Shapiro,
J.H.
Relation
212, 321-335.
138, 468-478.
in brain research
& Gruzelier,
stimuli.
vagal
changes
A.P.,
& Gruzelier,
intensity
of the central
Physiologmzl
of Physiology,
A. (1971).
of Physiology
Journal
organisation
the heart and blood vessels. Bond,
G., & Zanchetti,
and exercise.
N.,
by hypothalamic
of the Autonomic
Nervous
Wallach,
J.H.,
stimulation System,
&
Le
in rabbits
4, 301-317.
Blanc,
W.
(1981).
reveal a mediolateral
Cardiovascular organization.
133
M. C. Fermindez and .I. Vila / Cardrac defense response in humans Grossman, cardiac
P., & Svebak,
S. (1987)
control
active coping.
Heslegrave,
R.J.,
sympathetic Hilton,
during &
Furedy,
myocardial
S.M. (1975).
Respiratory
J.J.
(1980).
effects:
sinus arrhythmia
Psychophysiology, Carotid
dP/dt
Some considerations.
Ways of viewing the central
as an index of parasympathetic
24, 228-235. as a psychophysiological
Psychophysiology,
nervous
control
index
of
f7, 482-498.
of the circulation:
Old and new.
Brain Research, 87, 213-219. Knott,
V.J.. & Bulmer.
A comparison Larsen,
D.R.
(1984).
Heart
of male alcoholics
P.B., Schneiderman,
lar psychophysiology.
N., & De Carlo In M.G.H.
B. (1970).
Obrist,
Factors
P.A., & Light,
of sympathetic Obrist,
P.A.,
time:
K.C.
Light,
K.C.,
Relationship
Physiological
& S.W. Porges
Amsterdam:
the autonomic
Comments
effects:
stimulus:
bases of cardiovascu-
(Eds.),
Psychophysiology:
Elsevier.
component
on “carotid
dP/dr
Some considerations”,
McCubbin,
to blood
R. (1986).
auditory
Behauiors, 9, 201-205.
of the defense
reaction.
Acta
l-42.
(1980).
myocardial
Addictive
E. Donchin,
(pp. 122-165).
influencing
Scandinaoica , 78,
Physrologica
to a high intensity
controls.
Pasin,
Coles,
Systems, processes and apphcations Lisander,
rate responsivity
and normal
J.A.,
pressure
Hutcheson, and
as a psychophysiological
Psychophysiology,
J.S.,
myocardial
& Hoffer,
J.L.
performance.
index
17, 495-498.
(1979).
Pulse transit
Psychophysiology,
16,
292-301. Pegalajar,
J. (1986).
portamiento, Schwartz,
RX,
Turpin,
concept.
Williams,
New York: G.
(1986).
Turpin,
G.,
logical Turpin, Turpin,
Research,
system
J.J.M.
sympathetic
activity:
(1978).
intensity reflexes.
Cardiac
on autonomic
responding:
Psychophysiology, and forearm
The
problem
of
23 1-14.
plethysmographic
responses
to high
at the twentieth
annual
meeting
lo high intensrty
auditory
of the Society
for Psychophysio-
Vancouver. D.A.T.
G., & Siddle,
Vingerhoets,
as an index of cardiac
Biological Psychology, 6, 267-282. D.A.T. (1980, October). Auronomlc responses
(1981).
Psychophysiology,
J.J.M.
amplitude
20, 696-701. D. (1982). Behavioral approaches to cardiovascular disease.
stimulus
Paper presented
somatic Medicine,
T-wave
and defense
D.A.T.
& Siddle,
Psychophysiology, Vingerhoets,
de Terapia de/ Com-
stimuli.
G., & Siddle,
[summary].
of
orienting
auditory
srimulotion.
Reuista Espaiiola
Press.
Effects
G., & Siddle,
intensity
y autocontrol.
Psychophysiology,
R.B., & Shapiro,
Academic
differentiating Turpin,
cardiaca
P.J., & Weiss, T. (1983).
A misleading Surwit,
Percepcibn
4, 43-55.
D.A.T.
Autonomic
responses
to high intensity
auditory
stimulation
18, 150. (1983).
Effects
of stimulus
intensity
on cardiovascular
activity.
20, 611-624. (1984).
Biochemical
changes
in two subjects
succumbing
to syncope.
Psycho-
46, 95-103. (1985).
The
role of the parasympathetic
in stress and the emotions.
division
of the autonomic
Inrernarionnl Journal of Psychosomatics,
32, 28-34.
nervous