Accepted Manuscript Syn- and post-tectonic granite plutonism in the Sausar Fold Belt, Central India: age constraints and tectonic implications Anupam Chattopadhyay, Kaushik Das, Yasutaka Hayasaka, Arindam Sarkar PII: DOI: Reference:
S1367-9120(15)00203-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.006 JAES 2333
To appear in:
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
19 September 2014 28 March 2015 2 April 2015
Please cite this article as: Chattopadhyay, A., Das, K., Hayasaka, Y., Sarkar, A., Syn- and post-tectonic granite plutonism in the Sausar Fold Belt, Central India: age constraints and tectonic implications, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.006
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
2
Syn- and post-tectonic granite plutonism in the Sausar Fold Belt, Central India: age constraints and tectonic implications
3
Anupam Chattopadhyay1*, Kaushik Das2, Yasutaka Hayasaka2, Arindam Sarkar1
1
1
4 5
2
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, India
Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Hiroshima University, Japan
6
*Corresponding Author; Email:
[email protected]
7 8
Abstract:
9
Sausar Fold Belt (SFB) in central India forms the southern part of the central Indian Tectonic
10
Zone (CITZ) – a crustal scale Proterozoic mobile belt dissecting the Indian craton, whose
11
tectonothermal history and age is important for understanding the Proterozoic crustal history of
12
the Indian craton. SFB comprises a gneissic basement (TBG: Tirodi Biotite Gneiss) overlain by a
13
supracrustal sequence of quartzite-pelite-carbonate (SSG: Sausar Group). SSG and TBG are
14
deformed and metamorphosed in greenschist to amphibolite facies. Two phases of granite
15
intrusion are observed in the SSG – a syntectonic foliated granite and a post-tectonic massive
16
granite, with clear structural relationship with the host rocks. Monazite chemical dating (U-Th-
17
total Pb) of the foliated and massive granites yield Neoproterozoic (ca. 945-928 Ma) ages that
18
contradict many earlier geochronological interpretations. Foliated granites and the immediately
19
adjacent TBG show monazite grains with ca. 945 Ma mean age, interpreted as the timing of D2
20
deformation and amphibolite facies metamorphism of SSG. The post tectonic granites intruded
21
these rocks around 928 Ma, and were largely undeformed. A terminal thermal overprint is found
22
in some monazite grain rims at ca. 785 Ma age. The younger Sausar tectonothermal events have
23
overprinted the adjacent high-grade granulites of Ramakona-Katangi Granulite (RKG) belt, and
24
should not be considered as parts of the same tectonothermal event representing different depth
25
sections only. 1
26 27 28
Keywords: Sausar Fold belt, Deformation and Metamorphism, Intrusive granites, Monazite dating, Central Indian Tectonic Zone.
29
2
30
1. Introduction:
31
The Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) is an E-W trending crustal scale Proterozoic
32
mobile belt that dissects the Indian peninsular block and is supposedly continuous through the
33
Chhotanagpur Gneissic complex up to the southern fringe of the Shillong plateau (Radhakrishna
34
and Naqvi 1986, Acharyya 2001, Roy and Prasad 2003) (Fig. 1: inset). It has recently been
35
proposed that two major cratonic blocks of the Indian landmass, i.e. the North Indian Block
36
comprising the Bundelkhand nucleus and the South Indian Block comprising a combined Bastar-
37
Singhbhum-Dharwar nucleus, were stitched together along the CITZ during Neoproterozoic
38
(~1.0 Ga), more or less coinciding with the building of supercontinent Rodinia through a global
39
Grenvillian orogenic event (Bhowmik et al. 2012 and references therein). Alternatively, Mohanty
40
(2010) argued that the major tectonic activity along the CITZ predates the Grenvillian orogeny
41
and should be correlated with the Paleoproterozoic (~1.8 Ga) Capricorn orogeny of Western
42
Australia. Geologically, CITZ comprises a vast country of unclassified Precambrian gneisses
43
within which three major supracrustal belts viz. the Mahakoshal, Betul and Sausar belts occur
44
from north to south (Fig. 1). CITZ is also marked by a number of E-W trending tectonic
45
lineaments e.g. Son-Narmada North Fault (SNNF), Son-Narmada South Fault (SNSF),
46
Gavilgarh-Tan Shear Zone (GTSZ) and Central Indian Shear (CIS) that delimit these
47
supracrustal belts (Fig. 1). Most of these lineaments are major terrain-bounding shear zones of
48
Precambrian ancestry but have since been reactivated repeatedly as brittle faults, and have
49
caused many earthquakes in this relatively stable continental region (Acharyya and Roy 2000,
50
Roy and Devarajan 2003, Chattopadhyay et al. 2008).
51
The Sausar Fold Belt (SFB) is a large (approximately 300 km long and 70 km wide)
52
supracrustal belt near the southern margin of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ). SFB 3
53
comprises two major litho-tectonic ensembles viz. the Tirodi Biotite Gneiss (TBG) and the meta-
54
sedimentary Sausar Group (SSG) (Fig. 2). SSG is a typical platformal assemblage of quartzite,
55
pelite and carbonates with Mn-oxide ore horizons, metamorphosed from greenschist to upper
56
amphibolite facies (Bhowmik et al. 1999). TBG, on the other hand, is an ensemble of different
57
types of gneissic and plutonic igneous rocks (e.g. biotite-plagioclase gneiss, tonalite-
58
granodiorite-granite gneiss) with enclaves of meta-dolerite and mafic/felsic granulites (Bhowmik
59
et al. 1999, Chattopadhyay et al. 2001). The mafic granulites and high-grade felsic gneisses
60
occur along the northern margin of SFB, and constitute the Ramakona-Katangi Granulite (RKG)
61
belt. The RKG belt effectively marks the northern limit of SFB, which is separated from the
62
Betul supracrustal belt lying farther north, by the Gavilgarh-Tan shear zone (GTSZ) (Fig. 1),
63
marked as a zone of transpression and oblique collision (Chattopadhyay and Khasdeo 2011). The
64
southern margin of SFB exposes high-temperature meta-igneous granulites of the Balaghat-
65
Bhandara Granulite (BBG) belt which is separated from the adjacent Sakoli Fold Belt by the
66
Central Indian Shear (CIS) zone that also marks the southern boundary of CITZ (Roy and Prasad
67
2003, Bhandari et al. 2011) (Fig. 1). The central part of SFB is dominated by the metamorphosed
68
sedimentary rocks of Sausar Group (SSG), mainly represented by calc-silicate gneisses, calcitic
69
and dolomitic marble, garnet-staurolite-muscovite-(±fibrolite)-quartz schist and quartzite with
70
Mn-ore bearing gondite horizons (Fig. 3). SSG records evidences of polyphase deformation and
71
metamorphism during Sausar orogeny (Chattopadhyay et al. 2003 a, b). Within the SSG, two
72
phases of felsic plutonism – one early (syntectonic with Sausar deformation) and another post-
73
tectonic phase, have been identified (Pal and Bhowmik 1998, Chattopadhyay et al. 2003b). Time
74
of emplacement of these granites is important as these rocks have clear structural relationship
4
75
with the different deformation phases of SSG and therefore can bracket the timing of tectonic
76
deformation of the Sausar Group of rocks.
77
In the present contribution we describe the spatial distribution of these granitic rocks
78
within the deformed Sausar Group, their structural relationship and tectonic setting. We have
79
attempted to determine the ages of these granites through monazite chemical dating to constrain
80
the timing of the deformation of the Sausar Group, which is not clearly known so far. The
81
tectonic implications of the results and their significance in the context of presently available
82
geochronological data of the Sausar belt are discussed.
83 84
2. Previous geochronological study in the Sausar Fold Belt:
85 86
The Sausar Group (SSG) is known to contain only metasedimentary rocks without any syn-
87
depositional volcanic component (Narayanaswami et al. 1963, Pal and Bhowmik 1998,
88
Chattopadhyay et al. 2001), and has never been dated directly, possibly due the lack of suitable
89
material for geochronological study. Sarkar et al. (1986) reported an Rb-Sr whole rock age of
90
1525 ± 70 Ma and a biotite mineral-whole rock isochron age of ca. 860 Ma from Tirodi Biotite
91
Gneiss. The former age was interpreted by the authors as the timing of main amphibolite facies
92
metamorphism of SSG leading to the partial melting of basal psammo-pelitic units that generated
93
TBG. The latter age was attributed to a terminal thermal overprint on the Sausar rocks. Lippolt
94
and Hautmann (1994) reported an
95
manganese mines, and interpreted it as the age of cooling through the cryptomelane closure
96
temperature following the Satpura (≡ Sausar) orogeny. Recently, SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of
97
Tirodi biotite Gneiss from northern part of the RKG belt has assigned an age of 1618±8 Ma to
40
Ar/39Ar age of 950 Ma from cryptomelane in Sitapar
5
98
the time of magmatic crystallization of TBG protolith derived from a Paleoproterozoic source of
99
dominantly juvenile material with minor crustal components (Bhowmik et al. 2011). In this
100
northern domain, tourmaline-bearing granites intruding the TBG recorded an Rb-Sr whole rock
101
isochron age of 1147±16 Ma (Pandey et al. 1998). Roy et al. (2006) conducted Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd
102
dating of different tectonothermal events of Sausar Belt and proposed that the northern domain
103
(i.e. RKG belt) experienced peak granulite metamorphism prior to 1100 Ma, followed by
104
decompression and cooling at ca. 1100 Ma as reflected in the Sm-Nd age of coronal garnets in
105
metadolerites of this belt. Mafic granulites of the BBG belt, on the other hand, experienced peak
106
metamorphism at ca. 2672 Ma (Sm-Nd WR and mineral separate isochron in Charnockite), and a
107
subsequent cooling around 1400 Ma (mafic granulite and its mineral separate isochron). This
108
indicated a much older age of the BBG belt, which was possibly later juxtaposed with Sausar
109
belt around 1100 Ma. Both the RKG and BBG rocks, however, showed a consistent 800-900 Ma
110
Rb-Sr age which was interpreted as the effect of amphibolite facies Sausar orogenic event over
111
the pre-existing granulites that re-set the Rb-Sr isotopic clock. Mohanty (2010), however, re-
112
interpreted all the geological and geochronological data of the earlier workers to suggest that: (i)
113
the earliest deformation and metamorphism of Sausar Group occurred at 1900-1800 Ma, (ii) the
114
second major tectonothermal event, leading to the present E-W ‘Satpura trend’ in this belt,
115
occurred at 1500- 1400 Ma, and (iii) the 1000-900 Ma ‘Grenvillian’ event reported by some
116
earlier workers were only minor thermal overprints on the Sausar rocks. He thus concluded that
117
tectonic activity of the Sausar (or Satpura) mobile belt can be correlated with Paleoproterozoic
118
Capricorn orogeny of Western Australia, and not with the ~1000 Ma Grenvillian orogeny as
119
suggested by Bhowmik et al. (1999) and Roy et al. (2006). Recently, Bhowmik et al. (2012) have
120
dated different rocks from Northern (RKG) and central (SSG) domains using monazite. In
6
121
garnet-cordierite migmatite of the RKG domain, monazite grain cores have yielded weighted
122
mean ages of 1043±18 Ma while the rims show 955±11 Ma, which was interpreted as age of
123
peak granulite metamorphism and subsequent decompression respectively. Charnockite
124
emplaced during post-peak decompression recorded SHRIMP U-Pb mean age of 938±3 Ma.
125
Garnet-staurolite-kyanite schist and garnet-biotite-muscovite-quartz schist from eastern part of
126
the central domain showed mean monazite ages of 1062±13 and 993±19 Ma, tentatively
127
correlated with peak and retrograde metamorphism of Sausar Group rocks. On the basis of this,
128
Bhowmik et al. (2012) concluded that the amphibolite facies metamorphism of Sausar Group
129
occurred almost concurrently with peak granulite metamorphism of the RKG belt, representing
130
different crustal sections. This tectonic model doesn’t account for the earlier field observation
131
that a strong amphibolite facies ‘Sausar fabric’ was overprinted on the major granulitic fabric in
132
the RKG domain (Bhowmik et al. 1999). It also fails to explain a consistent 800-900 Ma Rb-Sr
133
reset age from all the rocks of RKG belt interpreted as the ‘Sausar imprint’ by Roy et al. (2006).
134
From petrologic evidences, Bhowmik and Roy (2003) suggested that after the peak granulite
135
metamorphism in RKG belt, the hydrous Sausar Group sediments were underthrusted below the
136
hot granulites which led to metamorphism of the Sausar Group and widespread retrogression of
137
the granulites. The nearly coincident monazite ages of peak metamorphism of SSG and RKG
138
reported by Bhowmik et al. (2012) contradicts this model.
139
In light of the above discussion on existing geochronological data of SFB, the timing of the
140
syn- and post-tectonic granites intrusive into Sausar Group sediments become very significant as
141
they can directly and tightly bracket the age of Sausar deformation events which have mostly
142
been judged indirectly from the age of the granulite metamorphism of RKG belt.
143
7
144
3. Structural character of the Sausar Group rocks and the granites:
145 146
Metasedimentary rocks of the Sausar Group and the underlying basement rocks (TBG)
147
show evidences of polyphase deformation. The first deformation manifested in large-scale
148
thrusting and associated recumbent/reclined folding (F1) along the northern margin of the SFB
149
(Fig. 4a). This involved southward transport of allochthonous basement slices over the SSG
150
rocks and their subsequent folding, leading to a large nappe-like structure, best demonstrated in
151
the Deolapar-Manegaon area (Deolapar Nappe: West 1936, Chattopadhyay et al. 2003a) (Fig.
152
3).These thrust planes and the early reclined folds were refolded into E-W trending, upright to
153
steeply northerly inclined, large-scale folds (F2) that define the present map pattern of the SFB
154
(Chattopadhyay et al. 2001, 2003a). The basement rocks (TBG) were often co-deformed with the
155
SSG and show strong nearly co-axial F1/F2 folding near the basement-cover boundary (Fig. 4b).
156
A set of small scale F3 folds was identified in Ramtek area which distorts the F2 fold-axis and
157
associated stretching lineations. Finally outcrop-scale, N-S trending, open folds (F4) overprinted
158
the earlier structures (Chattopadhyay et al. 2003b). As mentioned earlier, Sausar Group rocks
159
underwent Barrovian-type metamorphism varying from lower greenschist in the south and
160
southeast to upper amphibolite facies in the north and northwest. A clockwise P-T trajectory was
161
suggested for the metamorphism of Sausar Group, with peak metamorphism occurring at ~7
162
Kbar and ~ 675°C, followed by rapid decompression and cooling. Overall, four metamorphic
163
events were identified from SSG rocks (Bhowmik et al. 1999). However, different deformation
164
and metamorphic events were not correlated precisely. Study of porphyroblast-matrix
165
relationship in garnet and staurolite bearing mica-schist of Ramtek-Mansar area identified two
166
stages of garnet porphyroblast growth: first post-D1 (but pre-D2), and then syn-D2, while
8
167
staurolite grew only syn-D2 (Chattopadhyay and Ghosh 2007). This led to the conclusion that
168
peak metamorphism (amphibolite facies) in these rocks coincided with the D2 deformation and
169
F2 folding. In the northern part of SFB, near Deolapar, the peak metamorphic assemblage of
170
clinopyroxene-plagioclase±scapolite in calc-silicate gneisses occur along the S2 cleavage axial
171
planar to F2 folds (Khan et al. 2002, Chattopadhyay et al. 2003a).
172
Two distinct types of granites have intruded the metasedimentary rocks (SSG) within the
173
type SFB: foliated and massive (non-foliated) types. Foliated granites are exposed at a number of
174
locations in SFB, e.g. north of Deolapar, east of Karwahi, south of Chorbaoli, near Mansar
175
(Kandri manganese mines) and in Satak mines (Fig. 3). In Mansar-Kandri mines area near
176
Waitola village, pink colored foliated granites intrude the mica-schist and gondite horizons and
177
show a moderate to strong subvertical foliation parallel to the S2 foliation in the host mica-schist
178
(Fig. 4c). Intrusion of granite along the S2 foliation in host rock, and their deformation producing
179
parallel fabrics in mica-schist and granite possibly indicates early syn-D2 granite intrusion into
180
SSG. Under microscope, the foliated granites show an assemblage of quartz, K-feldspar,
181
plagioclase and biotite, with minor muscovite and iron oxides. Quartz grains with undulose
182
extinction, cross-hatched twinning in K-feldspar (microcline), and perthitic intergrowths in alkali
183
feldspar are common. Quartz grains show well developed deformation bands indicating
184
significant strain, and grain boundary migration of less deformed grains into the more deformed
185
ones (Fig. 4d: near black arrow). These microstructures indicate high-temperature (≥ 450°C)
186
deformation of the granitic rocks (e.g. Stipp et al. 2002), possibly in the amphibolite grade
187
similar to the host rocks, as mentioned above. A crude foliation, defined by elongate, deformed
188
quartz grains is observed. Foliation is not as distinct in the thin section as in the field outcrop,
189
possibly because we consciously collected samples from relatively less foliated parts of the
9
190
granite exposure to minimize the effects of weathering and alteration along the foliation. The
191
massive granites typically occur in and around Maudi-Dahoda, around Tangla and near Alesur
192
(Fig. 3). These granites do not show any foliation or any deformation, despite being surrounded
193
on all sides by intensely deformed rocks (mainly calc-silicate gneiss and dolomitic marble) of
194
SSG. Moreover, they often contain xenoliths of biotite gneiss (TBG) (near Maudi) and angular
195
rafts of calc-silicate gneiss (near Tangla) (Fig. 4e), indicating their post-tectonic intrusive
196
character (Khan et al. 2002). Microstructurally, the massive granites represent an interlocking
197
texture comprising subhedral grains of quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase and biotite, along with
198
small amount of chlorite and epidote (Fig. 4f). Foliation is not observed at either thin section
199
scale or in the outcrops.
200
4. Analytical methodology:
201
Geochemical analyses of the granite samples were carried out by X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
202
techniques using a Rigaku ZSX system at Hiroshima University, Japan. X-rays generated by an
203
Rh-W dual anode tube were radiated on fused bead samples. LOI are calculated after baking the
204
powdered sample successively at 120°C for 24 hours and 900°C for 6 hours. The analytical
205
precision (1σ) of major elements measured in XRF ranges between 0.001 and 0.14 wt%, while
206
that for minor elements ranges between 0.68 to 2.39 ppm. LA-ICPMS analysis (using 213 nm
207
Nd-YAG Laser (New Wave ResearchUP-213) coupled with Agilent 7500 ICP-MS at the
208
Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Hiroshima University) was carried out on
209
glass of the same powdered samples for trace elements and rare-earth element concentrations.
210
NIST610 glass using same ratio of sample and flux was also measured as standard sample before
211
and after of each unknown analysis. Blank glass is also measured for REE-content (though very
212
low) correction. The error limits for REE range between 2 and 5%. 10
213
Monazite grains were selected through a detailed study of scanning electron microscope and
214
targeted grains were imaged in SEM-BSE mode with a JEOL JSM-6390A equipped with a JED-
215
2300 energy dispersive system at the Hiroshima University. The operating voltage was 15kV
216
with variable spot sizes. Monazite grains were analyzed for rare earth element concentrations and
217
U-Th-total Pb concentrations with the JEOL JXA 8200 Superprobe at the Natural Science Center
218
for Basic Research and Development (N-BARD), Hiroshima University. The operating
219
conditions were 15 kV accelerating voltage, 200 nA beam current, and 4 to 5 µm beam diameter.
220
The following 16 lines Al-Kα, Si-Kα, P-Kα, S-Kα, Ca-Kα, Y-Lα, La-Lα, Ce-Lα, Pr-Lβ, Nd-Lβ,
221
Sm-Mβ, Gd-Mβ, Dy-Mβ, Pb-Mβ, Th-Mα and U-Mβ were measured, and then recalculated as
222
oxide by ZAF correction. The measurements of Pb-Mβ were carried out with a high-sensitive
223
detector (R = 100 mm). The interferences of Th-Mγ on U-Mβ and U-Mζ on Pb-Mβ were
224
corrected. Correction for Nd-Lβ1 due to Ce-Lβ2 was also employed. Standard materials were
225
ThO2 compound silicate glass and natural thorianite for Th, U3O8 compound silicate glass and
226
natural uraninite for U and Pb–Te for Pb. The peak intensities of Th, U, and Pb were integrated
227
for 60, 120, and 440 s, respectively. The detection limit of Pb at the 2s confidence level is of the
228
order of 45 ppm, and the measurement errors of PbO are 55 ppm for 0.05wt% level, and 66 ppm
229
for 0.5 wt% level, respectively. Details of the followed procedures are described in Fujii et al.
230
(2008). The basic principle of age dating using the U-Th-total Pb CHIME technique was
231
developed by Suzuki and Adachi (1991). However, age calculation in the present study is carried
232
out by employing the improved method of Cocherie and Albarede (2001) and plotted with
233
Isoplot/Ex version 3.7 (Ludwig 2008). The consistency of age data was checked using a standard
234
monazite of 1033 Ma (Hokada and Motoyoshi 2006).
235 11
236
5. Geochemical character of the granites:
237
Four representative samples of granitic rocks of SFB were analyzed for bulk
238
geochemistry prior to the monazite dating work described in detail in the next section. These
239
included one sample of foliated granite (SFB1205) collected from Waitola, one sample of Tirodi
240
Biotite Gneiss (SFB 1204) collected in the north of Chorbaoli, and two samples of massive
241
granite (SFB 1207 and SFB 1209) collected near Maudi and from the west of Tangla,
242
respectively (Fig. 3). Detailed location and modal mineralogy of the samples are shown in Table
243
1. We have analyzed these four representative samples to ascertain their major element, trace
244
element and REE chemistry. The major element, trace element and REE data of the studied
245
samples are given in Table 2.
246
The chemical data of the granitic and gneissic rocks are plotted in different variation
247
diagrams to analyze their broad geochemical character. The modal quartz, alkali feldspar and
248
plagioclase volume percentage, measured from thin sections, when plotted on a QAP diagram of
249
IUGS classification, shows that TBG (SFB 1204) and one of the massive granites (SFB 1209)
250
fall in the granodiorite field, whereas the other massive granite (SFB 1207) comes under the
251
monzogranite field. The pinkish colored foliated granite (SFB 1205) shows lower modal quartz
252
and falls marginally in the quartz-monzonite field (Fig. 5a). Shand’s Index plot of
253
Al2O3/(Na2O+K2O) vs. Al2O3/(CaO+Na2O+K2O) (e.g. Maniar and Piccoli 1989) shows that all
254
the studied rocks (granites and TBG) have a peraluminous character (Fig. 5b). Primitive mantle-
255
normalized trace element spiderplot shows LILE-enriched patterns of all the samples with
256
characteristic enrichment of Rb and Th, and depletion of Ba and Ti (Fig. 5c). The foliated granite
257
with quartz monzonite character, i.e. SFB1205 stands out with its higher content of Nb, Ta, and
258
strong depletion of Sr, P and Eu, while one of the massive granites (SFB1207) shows variable
12
259
depletion of Ba, Sr, Zr and Ti. Mantle-normalized REE plot also shows a LREE-enriched pattern
260
(Fig. 5d) with differential Eu negative anomaly (Eu/Eu* ranges between 0.04 and 0.66).
261
However, the foliated granite (SFB 1205) also shows a characteristic profile than others with
262
strongest Eu-anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.04) and overall HREE enrichment than other samples.
263 264
6. Monazite chemical dating of granites:
265
Three samples namely, SFB1202 (foliated granite, same as SFB 1205 described in the
266
above section), SFB1204 (Tirodi biotite gneiss) and SFB1207 (massive post-tectonic granite)
267
were selected for monazite U-Th-total Pb analysis to calculate their ages and chemical
268
characteristics, as described below.
269
In the foliated variety, i.e. SFB1202, monazite grains are of different size and shape.
270
Majority of the grains are subhedral and equant shaped with complex internal zoning (Fig. 6a).
271
The size ranges between 10 and 40 µm. A few grains are elongate tabular shaped and euhedral in
272
nature. Such grains are 5-7 µm wide but 30-40 µm long. Some grains are having numerous
273
inclusions at their interior as well as at the rim. Selected points (31 in total) from 11 grains are
274
analyzed for REE and U-Th-total Pb. Careful selection is made based on SEM-BSE images
275
covering all the zoned parts, and also both core and rim parts. Strong zoning though are present
276
in terms of Th-content in some grains (ThO2 ranging between 4.6 wt% to 12.3 wt% in same
277
grain). The chondrite-normalized LREE-MREE pattern shows strong enrichment of LREE with
278
respect to the MREE (Fig. 6b). Irrespective of such chemical variability, all the analyzed points
279
in all the grains except one grain (grain 2) yield strong age probability peak at ~950 Ma (Fig. 6c).
280
The point age data ranges from 914 ± 29 Ma to 982 ± 41 Ma (errors in 2σ). The weighted mean
281
age of this pool of data yields an age value of 944 ± 5 Ma (95% confidence, MSWD = 1.4) (Fig.
13
282
6d). It is noteworthy that this strong probability peak seems to be a doublet, and unmixing this
283
peak yields two closely spaced peaks at 935 ± 9 Ma and 949 ± 6 Ma. On the other hand, Grain 2
284
yields quite older age, as two points on this grain estimate age values of 1338 ±28 Ma (near-rim)
285
and 1609 ±32 Ma (near core).
286
Tirodi biotite gneiss (sample SFB 1204) has sizable monazite grains in quartzo-
287
feldspathic part as well as in close association with biotite-rich zones. The grains are anhedral to
288
subhedral in shape, and their size ranges between 30 µm and 100 µm. The larger grains have
289
complex internal zoning in SEM-BSI (Fig. 7a). The chondrite-normalized LREE-MREE patterns
290
show very similar LREE-enrichment with slightly more depletion of MREE than SFB1202 (Fig.
291
7b). Eight analyzed grains (44 points in total), yield a single strong peak at ~950 Ma (Fig. 7c).
292
The data range between 897 ±38 Ma and 978 ±33 Ma (errors in 2σ). The weighted average for
293
all the data is estimated to be 948 ±4 Ma (95% of confidence, MSWD = 1.11) (Fig 7d).
294
Statistically though all the data are plotted as showing one broad peak, the probability curve
295
shows a broad shoulder on the younger age side due to the fact that some of the larger grains
296
have younger age data at the rim (ranging between 897 ±38 Ma and 931 ±34 Ma).
297
On the other hand, the massive post-tectonic granite (sample SFB1207, garnet
298
porphyroblast/megacryst-bearing) contains monazite grains of different size and shape. Grain
299
shape varies from subhedral to anhedral, while grain sizes vary from few µm to nearly 100 µm.
300
Some of the larger grains have complex internal zoning in SEM-BSI (Fig. 8a) and also core-rim
301
structure (Fig. 8a). 36 data points from 7 monazite grains of different size, shape and
302
mineralogical associations are analyzed, where points are selected covering all the visible zones,
303
core and rim of the grains. The REE content of the analyzed data plots again show a LREE-
304
enriched pattern but more variation on MREE spectra (Fig. 8b). It is noteworthy that this is the
14
305
only sample that contains garnet porphyroblasts and a potential sink for MREE to HREE. The
306
calculated age data are plotted on probability density diagram, which yields a major peak at ~930
307
Ma and a minor peak at ~ 780 Ma (Fig. 8c). All the data forming the major peak is calculated for
308
weighted average age, which yields a mean age of 928 ±4 Ma (2σ, 95% confidence) after 2 data
309
rejections (Fig. 8d). However, the pool of data forming this major peak can possibly be a mixture
310
of two peaks, i.e. at 936 ±5 Ma and 917 ±7 Ma. Some of the grains have thin rims (sometimes
311
along resorbed grain boundaries). One such grain yields younger age of 785 ±15 Ma of spot age
312
on the rim.
313 314
7. Tectonic interpretation of age data:
315
Looking at the monazite data and the field observations, the following tectonic interpretation
316
of the age data is presented. The foliated granite (SFB 1202) possibly intruded the Sausar Group
317
sediments along the F2 foliations (early syn-D2 intrusion?), and was deformed during the regional
318
D2 deformation of SSG at ca. 945 Ma. The TBG (SFB 1204), which formed the basement to the
319
SSG, also underwent D2 deformation and metamorphism at ca. 945 Ma along with the foliated
320
granites and the Sausar Group, considering that the mean age found from the foliated granite and
321
TBG samples are almost same within error limits. It also indicates that any older age of the
322
basement TBG is not reflected in the monazite grains as all monazite grains grew with the S2
323
foliation in the granite. Optical microscopy also shows that majority of the monazite grains are in
324
close association with the foliation-forming biotite grains (Fig. 9). In some cases the grains are
325
slightly elongated and direction of elongation is crudely parallel to the foliation. From Ramtek
326
area, very close to the present sample sites, Chattopadhyay and Ghosh (2007) interpreted that
327
Sausar D2 fabric records the peak metamorphism (in garnet-staurolite-muscovite schist). It has
15
328
also been observed from many parts of Sausar Belt that the TBG has been co-deformed with
329
SSG during D1 and D2 deformation (Khan et al. 2002). The foliated granite also shows the
330
strongest foliation parallel to S2 in SSG in the sampling area. All these indicate that ~945 Ma is
331
the possible age of D2 deformation and peak metamorphism (≡ M2 of Pal and Bhowmik 1998) of
332
the Sausar Group. The single older (ca. 1300-1600 Ma) grain found in SFB 1202 might be
333
inherited from its protolith. It is noteworthy here that inheritance of monazite in a granitic melt
334
depends on the LREE content of the protolith and the degree of heating suffered by it (Kelsey et
335
al. 2008) while producing granitic melt, as discussed in the next section.
336
The D2 deformation and metamorphism of Sausar Group was followed by another (ca.
337
928±4Ma) event of granite magmatism represented by the massive granites (SFB 1207) with
338
weak thermal effect on pre-existing rocks (e.g. the younger rim ages of monazite: ca. 897 ±38
339
Ma and 931 ±34 Ma, in SFB 1204 and SFB1202 as mentioned above). The massive granites
340
(SFB 1207 and 1209) post-date Sausar orogenic deformation, and do not record any foliation-
341
forming event, although at a very few places, a weak foliation has been observed in the
342
peripheral parts of the massive granite bodies, indicating terminal tectonic effect (Khan et al.
343
2002). The 785±15 Ma age from monazite rims and resorbed grain boundaries of some monazite
344
grains of the massive granite (SFB 1207) possibly represents a late thermal overprint on these
345
rocks. Presently it doesn’t coincide with any known tectonothermal event in this area.
346 347
8. Discussion:
348 349
The geochemical data of the studied rocks suggest that they are peraluminous
350
granodiorite to monzonite in nature. They all show LILE- and LREE enrichment with negative
16
351
Eu anomaly. Such fractionated character (with possible crustal contamination) is typical of
352
continental granites, and also matches with the suggested continental collision set-up for the
353
high-pressure granulites (RKG belt) along the northern margin of the Sausar Fold belt (e.g.
354
Bhowmik et al. 1999). However, the monazite age data presented here throws new light on the
355
possible ages of deformation and metamorphism of the Sausar Group, and opens up some
356
questions regarding the earlier proposed collisional tectonic model. Roy et al. (2006) reported a
357
number of Rb-Sr ages in the range of 800-900 Ma from different granulitic rocks of RKG and
358
BBG belt and interpreted this age range as the timing of Sausar metamorphism. Later work
359
(Bhowmik et al. 2012) argued against this interpretation and suggested that the Sausar Group
360
was metamorphosed between 1062 Ma and 940 Ma. They correlated the peak metamorphism of
361
Sausar Group with that of RKG granulites at ca. 1043 Ma. However, two samples of Sausar
362
Group meta-sediments from Tumsar and Balaghat yielded widely different monazite ages of
363
1062±13 Ma and 993±19 Ma (Bhowmik et al. 2012). These two samples yielded only single
364
monazite age, and the younger age was interpreted by the authors as the result of monazite
365
growing with a post-peak decompression event. Interestingly, the most well constrained core-rim
366
age of monazite from RKG belt (e.g. sample R23B) reported by Bhowmik et al. (2012) showed a
367
retrogression age of ca. 955 Ma. Our work correlates the deformation phases in syn-tectonic
368
granites and the host rocks (SSG) from the central part of Sausar Belt (near Mansar-Kandri) and
369
suggests that the peak metamorphism and deformation of Sausar Group (D2/M2) took place
370
around 945 Ma (i.e. during the retrogression of the RKG granulites). This interpretation assigns a
371
younger age for peak metamorphism and deformation of the Sausar Group than that of the RKG
372
granulites, and therefore does not agree with simultaneous deformation and metamorphism of
373
SSG-RKG rocks as was tentatively suggested by Bhowmik et al. (2012). On the other hand, the
17
374
present age data indirectly corroborates the earlier interpretation of Bhowmik and Roy (2003)
375
that metamorphism of Sausar Group rocks, placed in an underthrusted pile below the RKG rocks,
376
resulted in devolatilization of Sausar sediments and led to the decompression and retrograde
377
metamorphism of overlying RKG mafic granulites. This may also explain the imprint of a
378
younger amphibolite facies fabric over the granulite fabric in mafic granulites, earlier reported by
379
Bhowmik et al. (1999) and Roy et al. (2006) from the field. Bhowmik and Roy (2003) also
380
suggested a small post-peak heating of the mafic granulites, possibly because of the heat
381
received from syn-tectonic granitoids. The ca. 945 Ma age of the syn-tectonic foliated granite
382
presented here temporally broadly coincide with the retrogression of RKG granulites and
383
therefore supports this assumption. The age of post tectonic granites (ca. 928 Ma) is the first age
384
data of the massive granites from Sausar Belt, and indicates that all major tectonothermal events
385
of the SFB were over by this time.
386
It is now known that during cooling of a granitic melt different proportion of monazite
387
may form at different stages of cooling (Kelsey et al., 2008). Hence, age data spread in monazite
388
forming a broad probability peak should be a natural consequence of differential growth at
389
different stages of cooling. However, a new probability peak at ca. 928 Ma and absence of
390
deformation fabric help to separate this temporally close but a new granitic magmatism at ca.
391
928 Ma. Furthermore, resorbed grain boundaries of some of the monazite grains and much
392
younger age of 785±15 Ma found in such monazite rims seem to indicate an age of monazite
393
dissolution and re-precipitation during a later thermal pulse. It is noteworthy that this youngest
394
age is something new for the Sausar belt, as no major tectonothermal event of such young age
395
has been reported till date from this area. However several ca. 800-900 Ma age Rb-Sr ages have
396
been reported from Sausar belt by earlier workers (e.g. Sarkar et al. 1986, Roy et al. 2006), as
18
397
discussed in section 2 above. For example, garnetiferous metadolerites from the RKG belt were
398
reported to yield an Rb-Sr age of ca. 834±21 Ma (Roy et al. 2006). This ca. 800 Ma age was
399
interpreted as the age of Sausar metamorphism by the authors. However, in light of the present
400
age data, this must be reinterpreted as a later thermal overprint post-dating the Sausar
401
deformation and metamorphism. Broadly, the present age data shows that the tectonothermal
402
history of the Sausar Group and adjacent high-grade rocks temporally correspond to the global
403
Grenvillian orogenic event, and do not match the age of Capricorn Orogen as suggested by
404
Mohanty (2010). It is noteworthy here that the chemically distinct foliated granite has some
405
monazite grains of older age, and we consider them as inherited age from the protoliths of this
406
granite.
407
On a larger perspective, this new set of data of tectonothermal events and granite
408
magmatism in the Sausar Fold Belt between ca. 950 Ma to ca. 800 Ma needs some special
409
attention in terms of the reported ages of similar deep crustal events from other parts of India.
410
The ca. 950 Ma age is considered to be an age of superposed metamorphism and deformation on
411
ca. 1000 Ma UHT granulites in the central part of the Eastern Ghats Belt (EGB) (Das et al. 2011,
412
Bose et al. 2011), possibly due to the Rayner orogenic pulse that primarily affected neighboring
413
east Antarctica in the ‘Rodinia’ supercontinent (Kelly et al. 2002, Harley 2003, Halpin et al.
414
2005, 2007). The present data suggest that the peak metamorphism and deformation in the
415
Sausar Group (D2/M2) is coeval with the orogenic pulse affecting deep crust of EGB, India and
416
Rayner complex, Antarctica. Although the ca. 930 Ma age of post-tectonic massive granite from
417
the present study indicate the end of major tectonic pulses in this cratonic interior part of India,
418
the central EGB and Rayner complex were tectonically active till ca. 900 Ma (Das et al., 2011;
419
Dasgupta et al., 2013). Though the present database imply a minor peak at ca. 800 Ma possibly
19
420
representing an event of thermal perturbation, regionally this age is not that uncommon.
421
Intriguingly it represents different events at different parts. Chatterjee et al. (2010) defined an N-
422
S trending tectonic zone, namely East Indian Tectonic Zone (EITZ) on the eastern boundary of
423
Chhotanagpur gneissic complex and North Singhbhum Mobile Belt of comparable age. This
424
zone seems to have its southward extension beyond Indian craton to the submarine Kerguelen
425
Plateau (Chatterjee and Nicolaysen 2012). Though this inter-continental zone primarily
426
represents deep crustal deformation zone in India, the northern EGB represented by Chilka Lake
427
granulites record a major deep-crustal metamorphism around ca. 785 Ma (Bose et al. 2008).
428
Similarly, the marginal granulite belt in the southern part of West Dharwar Craton also had
429
suffered a deep crustal metamorphism at ca. 800 Ma (Das et al. 2013). Though the exact nature
430
of this ca. 800 Ma event is not yet clear but it seems to be increasingly clear that this represents a
431
major event of tectonic to tectono-metamorphic pulse at the margins of erstwhile Indian cratonic
432
blocks from south to central portion, and to the east.
433 434
9. Conclusions:
435 436
1) Monazite chemical dating of foliated and massive granites from Sausar Fold Belt, central
437
India, yield Neoproterozoic ages which can be interpreted as the timing of regional
438
metamorphism and deformation. The foliated granite and the Tirodi Biotite Gneiss show
439
monazite grains of ca. 945 Ma age which is interpreted as the timing of D2 deformation and
440
accompanying peak amphibolite facies metamorphism of SSG. The massive granites represent
441
post-tectonic intrusion at ca. 928 Ma.
20
442
2) A late thermal imprint is identified in the monazite rims at ca. 785 Ma. This might be the
443
same thermal event (ca. 800 Ma) that was earlier interpreted as the main Sausar metamorphic
444
event by Roy et al. (2006).
445
3) The peak tectonothermal event affecting SSG (ca. 950 Ma) are younger than that in the
446
RKG granulites (ca. 1043 Ma), and in fact temporally coincides with the decompression and
447
retrogression of these granulites (ca. 955 Ma). Therefore the Sausar S2 foliations overprint the
448
pre-Sausar granulite fabric in these rocks as observed in the field by many earlier workers.
449 450
Acknowledgement:
451
This work was partly funded by the University Grants Commission (UGC) (grant no.
452
F.42-66/2013(SR)-HRP) and by the University of Delhi R&D grant (grant no. Dean
453
(R)/R&D/2012/917) to AC. Department of Geology provided the necessary microscopic facility.
454
We are thankful to Prof. M. Santosh for his comments and editorial handling. Critical comments
455
and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers were extremely helpful for revising the manuscript.
456
21
457
References:
458
Acharyya, S.K., 2001. Geodynamic setting of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone in central,
459 460 461
eastern and northeastern India. Geol. Surv. India Spl. Pub. 64, 17–35. Acharyya, S.K., Roy, A., 2000. Tectonothermal history of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone and reactivation of major faults/shear zones. J. Geol. Soc. India 55, 239 –256.
462
Bhandari, A., Pant, N.C., Bhowmik, S.K., Goswami, S., 2011. 1.6 Ga ultrahigh-temperature
463
granulite metamorphism in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: insights from metamorphic
464
reaction history, geothermobarometry and monazite chemical ages. Geol. J. 46, 198–216.
465
Bhowmik, S.K., Pal, T., Roy, A., Pant, N.C., 1999. Evidence for Pre-Grenvillian high-pressure
466
granulite metamorphism from the northern margin of the Sausar mobile belt in central India.
467
J. Geol. Soc. India 53, 385–399.
468
Bhowmik, S.K., Roy, A., 2003. Garnetiferous metabasites from the Sausar Mobile Belt:
469
petrology, P-T path and implications for the tectonothermal evolution of the Central Indian
470
Tectonic Zone. J. Petrol. 44, 387–420.
471
Bhowmik, S.K., Wilde S.A., Bhandari, A., 2011. Zircon U-Pb/Lu-Hf and monazite chemical
472
dating of the Tirodi biotite gneiss: implication for latest Palaeoproterozoic to Early
473
Mesoproterozoic orogenesis in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Geol. J. 46, 574–596.
474
Bhowmik, S.K., Wilde S.A., Bhandari, A., Pal T., Pant N.C., 2012. Growth of the Greater Indian
475
Landmass and its assembly in Rodinia: geochronological evidence from the Central Indian
476
Tectonic Zone. Gond. Res. 22, 54–72.
477
Bose, S., Dunkley, D.J., Arima, M., 2008. Zircon U–Pb SHRIMP ages from Eastern Ghats Belt,
478
India and their implication in the Indo-Antarctic correlation. In: AGU Fall Meeting, San
479
Francisco, USA, Abstract Vol. 2159. 22
480
Bose, S., Dunkley, D.J., Dasgupta, S., Das, K., Arima, M., 2011. India–Antarctica–Australia–
481
Laurentia connection in the Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic revisited: evidence from new
482
zircon U–Pb and monazite chemical age data from the Eastern Ghats Belt, India. Bull. Geol.
483
Soc. Am. 123, 2031–2049.
484
Boynton, W.V., 1984. Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements; meteorite studies. In: Rare
485
earth element geochemistry. Henderson, P.(Eds), Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 63-114.
486
Chatterjee, N., Banerjee, M., Bhattacharya, A., Maji, A.K., 2010. Monazite chronology,
487
metamorphism-anatexis and tectonic relevance of the mid-Neoproterozoic Eastern Indian
488
Tectonic Zone. Precam. Res. 179, 99-120.
489
Chatterjee, N., Nicolaysen, K., 2012. An intercontinental correlation of the mid-Neoproterozoic
490
Eastern Indian Tectonic Zone: evidence from the gneissic clasts in Elan Bank conglomerate,
491
Kerguelen Plateau. Contrib. Min. Pet. 163, 789-806.
492
Chattopadhyay, A., Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Khan, A.S., 2001. Geology and structure of the
493
Sausar Fold Belt: a retrospection and some new thoughts. Geol. Surv. India, Spl. Pub. 64,
494
251–263.
495
Chattopadhyay, A., Ghosh, N., 2007. Polyphase deformation and garnet growth in pelitic schists
496
of Sausar Group in Ramtek area, Maharashtra, India: a study of porphyroblast-matrix
497
relationship. J. Earth Syst. Sc. 116, 423-432.
498
Chattopadhyay, A., Huin, A. K., Khan, A. S., 2003a. Structural framework of Deolapar area,
499
central India and its implications for Proterozoic nappe tectonics. Gond. Res. 61, 107-117.
500
Chattopadhyay, A., Khan, A.S., Huin, A.K., Bandyopadhyay, B. K. 2003b. Reinterpretation of
501
stratigraphy and structure of Sausar Group in Ramtek-Mansar-Kandri area, Maharashtra,
502
central India. J. Geol. Soc. India 61, 75-89.
23
503
Chattopadhyay, A., Khasdeo, L., 2011. Structural evolution of Gavilgarh-Tan Shear Zone,
504
central India: A possible case of partitioned transpression during Mesoproterozoic oblique
505
collision within Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Precam. Res. 186, 70-88.
506
Chattopadhyay, A., Khasdeo, L., Holdsworth R. E., Smith S. A. F., 2008. Fault reactivation and
507
pseudotachylite generation in the semi-brittle and brittle regimes: examples from the
508
Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone, central India. Geol. Mag. 145, 766-777.
509 510
Cocherie, A., Albarede, F., 2001. An improved U–Th–Pb age calculation for electron microprobe dating of monazite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 65, 4509–22.
511
Das, K., Bose, S., Karmakar, S., Dunkley, D.J., Dasgupta, S., 2011. Multiple tectono-
512
metamorphic imprints in the lower crust: first evidence of ca. 950Ma (zircon U–Pb SHRIMP)
513
compressional reworking of UHT aluminous granulites from the Eastern Ghats Belt, India.
514
Geol. J. 46, 217–239.
515
Das, K., Kimura, K., Bose, S., Hayasaka, Y, Hidaka, H., 2013. Neoproterozoic reworking of
516
Archean deep continental crust in the Coorg Massif, India: SHRIMP zircon and EMP
517
monazite geochronology and implication on Dharwar craton margin orogenesis during the
518
assembly of Gondwana. Annual Meeting Abstract, Geol. Soc. Japan.
519 520
Dasgupta, S., Bose, S., Das, K., 2013. Tectonic evolution of the Eastern Ghats Belt. Precam. Res. 227, 247-258.
521
Fujii, M., Hayasaka, Y., Terada, K., 2008. SHRIMP zircon and EPMA monazite dating of
522
granitic rocks from the Maizuru terrane, southwest Japan: Correlation with East Asian
523
Paleozoic terranes and geological implications. Island Arc 17, 322-341.
24
524
Halpin, J.A., Gerakiteys, C.L., Clarke, G.L., Belousova, E.A., Griffin, W.L. 2005. In-situ U-Pb
525
geochronology and Hf isotope analyses of the Rayner Complex, east Antarctica. Contrib.
526
Min. Pet. 148, 689-706.
527
Halpin, J.A., White, R. W., Clarke G. L., Kelsey D. E., 2007. The Proterozoic P–T–t evolution of
528
the Kemp Land Coast, East Antarctica; constraints from Si-saturated and Si-undersaturated
529
metapelites. J. Petrol. 48, 1321-1349.
530
Harley, S.L., 2003. Archean-Cambrian crustal development of East Antarctica: metamorphic
531
characteristics and tectonic implications. In: Yoshida, M., Windley, B.F., Dasgupta, S.
532
(eds.) Proterozoic East Gondwana: supercontinent assembly and breakup. Geol. Soc. Lon.
533
Spl. Pub. 206, 203-230.
534
Hokada,T., Motoyoshi, Y., 2006. Electron microprobe technique for U-Th-Pb and REE
535
chemistry of monazite, and its implications for pre-, peak- and post- metamorphic events of
536
the Lutzow-Holm Complex and the Napier Complex, East Antarctica. Polar Geosc.19, 118-
537
151.
538
Kelly, N.M., Clarke, G.L., Fanning, C.M., 2002. A two-stage evolution of the Neoproterozoic
539
Rayner Structural Episode: new U–Pb sensitive high resolution ion microprobe constraints
540
from the Oygarden Group, Kemp Land, East Antarctica. Precam. Res. 116, 307-330.
541
Kelsey, D.E., Clarke, G.L., Hand, M., 2008. Thermobarometric modeling of zircon and
542
monazite growth in melt-bearing systems: examples using model metapelitic and
543
metapsammitic granulites. J. Met. Geol. 26, 199-212.
544
Khan, A.S., Huin, A.K., Chattopadhyay, A., 2002. Final report on Specialized Thematic
545
Mapping in the Sausar Fold Belt in Manegaon-Deolapar-Ramtek area, Nagpur and Bhandara
25
546
districts, Maharashtra, for elucidation of stratigraphy, structure, metamorphic history and
547
tectonics. Unpub. Rep. Geol. Surv. India, Nagpur. 72 p.
548 549 550 551 552 553
Lippolt, H.J., Hautman, S., 1994.
40
Ar/39Ar ages of Precambrian manganese ore minerals from
Sweden, India and Morocco. Mineral. Deposita 18, 195-215. Ludwig, K. R., 2008. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.6. Special Publication no. 4, Berkley, Berkeley Geochronology Center, 77p. Maniar, P. D., Piccoli, P. M., 1989. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 101, 635-643.
554
McDonough, W.F., Sun, S.-S., 1995. Composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 120, 223-253.
555
Mohanty, S., 2010. Tectonic evolution of the Satpura mountain belt: a critical evaluation and
556
implication on supercontinent assembly. J. Asian Earth Scs. 39, 516-428.
557
Narayanaswamy, S., Chakravarthy, S.C., Vemban, N.A., Shukla, K.D., Subramaniam, M.R.,
558
Venkatesh, V., Rao, G.V., Anandalwar, M.A., Nagarajaiah, R.A., 1963. The geology and
559
manganese ore deposits of the manganese belt in Madhya Pradesh and adjoining parts of
560
Maharastra. Part I: general introduction. Bull. Geol. Surv. India, A-22 (I).
561 562
Pal, T., Bhowmik, S.K., 1998. Metamorphic history of Sausar group of rocks. Unpubl. Report Geol. Surv. India. 98p.
563
Pandey, B.K., Krishna, V., Chabria, T., 1998. An overview of Chotanagpur gneiss–granulite
564
complex and adjoining sedimentary sequences, eastern and central India, In: International
565
Seminar on Precambrian Crust in Eastern and Central India 1998. Abstract Volume
566
UNESCO-IUGSIGCP-368, 131–135.
567 568
Radhakrishna, B. P., Naqvi, S. M., 1986. Precambrian continental crust of India and its evolution. J. Geol. 92, 145-166.
26
569
Roy, A., Devarajan, M.K., 2003. Tectonics and Seismicity of Central India: A Review. In: Roy,
570
A., Mohabey, D.M. (eds.) Seismicity of Central India, Gond. Geol. Mag. Spl. vol. 5, 23-44.
571 572
Roy, A., Prasad M. H., 2003. Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implications in Rodinian crustal assembly. J. Asian Earth Scs. 22, 115-129.
573
Roy, A., Kagami, H., Yoshida, M., Roy, A., Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Chattopadhyay, A., Khan,
574
A.S., Huin, A.K., Pal, T., 2006. Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd dating of different metamorphic events
575
from the Sausar mobile belt, central India: implications for Proterozoic crustal evolution. J.
576
Asian Earth Scs. 26, 61–76.
577
Sarkar, S.N., Trivedi, J.R., Gopalan, K., 1986. Rb-Sr whole-rock and mineral isochron age of the
578
Tirodi Gneiss, Sausar Group, Bhandara district, Maharashtra. J. Geol. Soc. India 27, 30-37.
579
Stipp, M., Stunitz, H., Heilbronner, R., Schmid, S. M., 2002. The eastern Tonale fault zone: a
580
‘natural laboratory’ for crystal plastic deformation of quartz over a temperature range from
581
250 to 700°C. J. Struc. Geol. 24, 1861–84.
582
Suzuki, K., Adachi, M. 1991. Precambrian provenance and Silurian metamorphism of the
583
Tubonosawa paragneiss in the South Kitakamiterrane, Northeast Japan, revealed by the
584
chemical U–Th–total Pb isochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime. Geochem. J. 25,
585
357–376.
586 587
West, W.D., 1936. Nappe structure in the Archaean rocks of the Nagpur district. Trans. Nat. Inst. Sci. India 1, 93-102.
588
27
589
Figure captions:
590
Fig. 1: Simplified Geological Map of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone showing the position of
591
Sausar Belt and the bounding lineaments (modified after Chattopadhyay and Khasdeo
592
2011).
593
(modified after Radhakrishna and Naqvi 1986). Box in the inset shows the area of Fig. 1.
594 595
Inset: Map of India showing different Proterozoic cratons and mobile belts
Fig. 2: Simplified Geological Map of the Sausar Fold Belt (modified after Chattopadhyay et al. 2003a). The box shows the area of the present study, detailed in Fig. 3.
596
Fig. 3: Geological map of the central part of Sausar Fold Belt relevant to the present study,
597
showing the locations of granitic samples (sample numbers in white boxes). Map
598
modified after Khan et al. (2002).
599
Fig. 4: (a) Small-scale reclined F1 fold
in quartzite of Sausar Group. (b) Early
600
reclined/recumbent F1 fold superposed by steeply inclined F2 folds in TBG. (c) Field
601
outcrop of foliated granite near Waitola railway crossing. The yellow box is parallel to
602
the subvertical foliation in the granite. (d) Deformation bands and grain boundary
603
migration microstructure in quartz grains (near black arrows) in foliated granite. (e)
604
Angular xenolith of calc-silicate rock floating in the intrusive massive granite. Lens cap
605
for scale. The host rock (calc-silicate) is seen in the left side of the photo. (f)
606
Inequigranular granitic texture of the massive granite.
607
Fig.5: Geochemical data plots of the granites: (a) Modal percentage values of Quartz, Alkali
608
Feldspar and Plagioclase of the samples plotted in IUGS QAP diagram to indicate broad
609
geochemical classification of the samples. (b) Samples plotted on a Shand’s Index (molar
610
A/CNK ratios) plot indicate a general peraluminous character of the granites. (c) 28
611
Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider plot indicates overall LILE enrichment.
612
Note particular enrichment of HFSE (Nb and Ta) in foliated granite. (d) Mantle-
613
normalized REE spider plot shows LREE-enriched patterns with variable Eu anomaly
614
strong depletion. REE data of primitive mantle is from McDonough and Sun (1995).
615
Sample SFB 1205 is same as sample SFB 1202 used for monazite dating, as explained in
616
Table 1. See text for more details.
617
Fig. 6: (a) SEM-Back Scattered Electron image of representative monazite grain of foliated
618
granite (SFB1202). Grains show complex internal zoning. (b) Chondrite-normalized
619
LREE to MREE plot shows strong LREE enrichment. (c) Density probability diagram of
620
U-Th-total Pb age (n = 31). (d) Weighted average age is plotted for <1000 Ma age data
621
points yielding an age of 944 ± 5 Ma.
622
Fig. 7: (a) SEM-BSE image of representative monazite grain of Tirodi biotite gneiss (SFB1204)
623
with less pronounced internal zoning. (b) Chondrite-normalized LREE to MREE plot
624
shows strong LREE enrichment with more enriched and constrained values of MREE
625
than that of SFB1202. (c) Density probability diagram of U-Th-total Pb age (n = 44). (d)
626
Weighted average age is plotted for all age data points yielding an age of 948±4 Ma.
627
Fig. 8: (a) SEM-BSE image of representative monazite grains of massive post-tectonic granite
628
(SFB1207) with complex internal zoning (left) and core-rim structure (right). (b)
629
Chondrite-normalized LREE to MREE plot shows high LREE enrichment with large
630
variation of MREE than that of both SFB1202 and SFB1204. Note that monazite grains
631
close to garnet grains are highly MREE-depleted.(c) Density probability diagram of U-
632
Th-total Pb age (n = 36). The broad peak ~928 Ma is possibly a mixed one of two closely
29
633
spaced peaks, at 936 ±5 Ma and 917 ±7 Ma. Rare rim of monazite indicates a possible
634
younger thermal event~ 780 Ma.(d) Weighted average age is plotted for all age data
635
points yielding an age of 928 ± 4 Ma.
636
Fig. 9: Photomicrograph showing development of monazite, spatially closely associated with
637
biotite and muscovite grains oriented parallel to S2 schistosity, in the foliated granite
638
(SFB 1202).
639
.
640 641
30
642 643 644 645 646
Highlights: • • • •
Sausar Fold Belt in Central India shows polyphase deformation and metamorphism Intrusive granites are either foliated (syn-D2) or massive (post-tectonic) Monazite ages of granites constrain the timing of Sausar tectonothermal events The new ages cast some doubts on the earlier proposed tectonic models of CITZ
647
31
Figure 1 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 2 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 3 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 4 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 5 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 6 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 7 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 8 Click here to download high resolution image
Figure 9 Click here to download high resolution image
Table 1
Table 1: Inventory of Granite samples from Sausar Fold belt, used in Monazite dating Sample No.
Location
Rock Type
Structure/ microstructure
Modal mineralogy
Remarks
SFB1202/12 05**
N21˚23'41.1'' E079˚17'07.9'' Near Railway crossing, Waitola village (GPS accuracy: 10 m)
Foliated pink Granite intrusive in to Sausar Group sediments (Mansar Fm)
Moderately to weakly foliated, locally strongly foliated. Foliation in granite is parallel to S2 of Sausar Group in adjacent schistose rocks
Quartz (41%)- K feldspar (39%)-Plagioclase (18%)biotite-muscovite- oxides(±Monazite±Zircon)*
Syn-D2 intrusion into Sausar Group: foliations in granite are parallel to S2 in SSG *Very small grains of monazite and zircon were identified by SEM in all samples ** SFB 1202 and 1205 are from same outcrop – one used for dating, another for geochemistry
SFB1204
N21˚27'38.0'' E079˚18'39.8'' South of Chobaoli, near mile stone No. 680 (on NH-31 to Jabalpur) (GPS accuracy 16 m)
Folded Tirodi Biotite Gneiss (TBG)
Perpendicular to shallow plunging fold axis (F2 of Sausar deformation) defined by gneissic foliation
Quartz (16%) -K-feldspar (38%) –Plagioclase (24%)Biotite (14%) – Muscovite (7%) (±Apatite ±Monazite ±Zircon)
Basement gneiss to Sausar Group and the granites Basement gneiss has been codeformed with Sausar Group during F1 and F2 of Sausar deformation.
SFB1207
N21˚31'25.8'' E079˚19'00.2'' West of Maudi village (GPS accuracy 09 m)
Unfoliated Granite intrusive into calcareous sediments (Lohangi Fm)
No foliation recognized either in the outcrop or in thin sections.
Quartz (29%)-K-feldspar (42%)-Plagioclase (25%) Biotite±Muscovite (~1%) ± Garnet (Pyr-Sps) ± Monazite
Post-tectonic undeformed granite intrusive into deformed Sausar Group rocks
SFB1209
N21˚35'08.5'' E079˚24'31.1'' near Umri-Junewani in Sagra Nala (GPS accuracy 10 m)
Un-foliated Granite (intrusive into Sausar Group))
No foliation
Quartz (19%) -K-feldspar (45%)-Plagioclase (35%) Biotite- Garnet (low modal) ±Monazite ±Zircon
-do-
Table 2
Table 2: Major, Trace and REE chemical data of granites and TBG from Sausar Fold Belt SFB1204 SFB1205/1202** 70.63 78.55
SFB1207 75.10
SFB1209 73.80
SiO2
wt%
TiO2
wt%
0.46
0.07
0.04
0.15
Al2O3
wt%
14.24
12.15
14.08
13.82
Fe2O3 MnO MgO CaO Na2O
wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%
4.79 0.06 1.75 1.31 2.63
1.48 0.04 0.38 0.53 4.30
0.98 0.03 0.09 0.84 3.71
1.89 0.02 0.28 1.02 2.94
K2O
wt%
3.35
3.00
4.39
5.44
P2O5
wt%
0.12
0.01
0.04
0.04
LOI (H2O+) Total
wt% wt%
1.26 100.60
0.52 101.03
0.69 99.99
0.60 100.01
Sc V Cr Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Rb Cs Ba Pb Sr Y Zr Nb La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu
ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm* ppm*
10.79 66.65 398.61 9.38 24.99 33.23 100.07 18.97 195.36 4.48 353.58 27.74 114.78 29.94 169.71 13.26 55.32 71.57 7.58 29.06 5.74 1.15
1.78 7.95 383.46 2.49 7.89 8.64 38.96 34.37 278.88 3.42 55.19 29.82 9.38 51.06 170.47 118.08 31.21 70.34 2.14 8.69 3.76 0.06
2.02 2.47 380.14 0.65 5.70 9.74 36.07 28.26 279.35 b.l. 188.29 69.44 46.55 18.62 58.32 16.63 45.38 47.17 4.10 17.37 4.15 0.49
2.92 9.45 413.00 2.16 9.11 6.33 40.51 20.36 191.49 10.07 866.27 69.53 156.02 6.88 126.05 7.65 90.52 122.00 11.76 43.34 7.28 1.13
Gd ppm* 4.97 6.10 Tb ppm* 0.79 1.33 Dy ppm* 4.65 9.81 Ho ppm* 1.06 2.22 Er ppm* 2.65 6.41 Tm ppm* 0.46 0.98 Yb ppm* 3.03 6.79 Lu ppm* 0.45 0.86 Hf ppm* 4.31 9.35 Ta ppm* 1.17 10.11 Th ppm* 18.28 56.02 U ppm 3.40 2.85 b.l. stands for below detection level. * data by LA-ICPMS.
3.79 0.67 3.62 0.65 1.45 0.24 1.52 0.20 3.23 2.14 24.64 5.76
4.27 0.46 1.96 0.31 0.73 0.11 0.40 0.06 3.62 0.50 42.90 3.37
** SFB 1202 and SFB 1205 are samples of foliated granite collected from the same outcrop near Waitola – one used for geochemistry (SFB 1205) and the other for monazite dating (SFB 1202)