Synchronization of E. Coli K 12 by membrane selection

Synchronization of E. Coli K 12 by membrane selection

Vol. 41, No. 2, 1970 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS SYNCHRONIZATION OF -E. COLI K 12 BY MEMBRANE SELECTION Donald J. Cummings ...

247KB Sizes 35 Downloads 41 Views

Vol. 41, No. 2, 1970

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

SYNCHRONIZATION OF -E. COLI K 12 BY MEMBRANE SELECTION Donald J. Cummings Department of Microbiology University of Colorado Medical Center Denver, Colorado

Received September 16, 1970

summary E. coli K 12 Hfr and F- strains were synchronized using the membrane The bacteria were deposited onto a Polyvic selec%aTchnique (1,2). (Polyvinyl chloride) Membrane and eluted with growth medium, About 20 percent of the Hfr strain and 7 to 9 percent of the F- strain remained bound to the membraneand at division, each bacterial strain yielded a culture of the youngest cells in an exponential population. Introduction Helmstetter

and Cununings(1) reported that cultures of --E. coli B/r

ctxld be synchrcnised using a membraneselection procedure. the bacteria were deposited on a millipore the bacterium; the filter mediumat 37V.

was inverted

filter

In this procedure

of pore size smaller than

and the cells eluted with

growth

Hithin 35 to 40 minutes, about 95 percent of the initial

populaticm of the cells were eluted from the filter 5 percent of the cells remained firmly

and discarded (2);

bound to the membraneand grcmth

of these cells persisted upon the continual addition of eluant. 95 percent of the newly divided cells eluted,

thus providing

At division,

a continuous

source of the youngest cells in an exponential population. The main advantage of this membranemethod was that no stress was applied to the exponential

population in order to achieve synchrony (1.3).

Consequently, investigations replication

had a direct

on the periodicity

of protein

synthesis and DNA

bearing on understanding the cell cycle (2,4,5,6). 471

BIOCHEMICAL

Vol. 41, No. 2, 1970

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A disadvantage was that only -E. coli B and B/r strains were subject to this selection the effects

(1,2).

of the sex factor

could be studied, above.

Other bacteria,

and conjugaticn

2. &K

of g, coli

readily

cells when division

from the membrane, about half the

thus preventing

and eluted sporadically

the collection

This communication describes the applica-

tion of the membraneselectian

technique to -E. coli

was achieved using a polyvinyl

chloride membrane.

Materials Growth of Bacteria.

E. -- coli K 12 strains

grown in nutrient

AB 253 F- and AB 259 Hfr were

As before (1.2) the bacteria

A 'I-liter

culture

was inoculated with about

2 x 108 cells and grown for 12 to 14 hours at 37°C. culture were used to inoculate

titer

were filtered

Eluticn

to

5 x 107/ml

the synchrony apparatus (2) and the remain-

thrcugh a 0.6511 ME (Millipore

Corporation,

and 6 to 10 x 107/ml, respectively, filter

the bacteria were . (BDWP,293 mmdiameter, 0.6 w pore size, poly-

chloride membrane, Millipore

Corporaticn,

Bedford, Mass.)

wetted with 40 ml of 0.8 percent of Bacto-Tryptone

The filter

broth.

was begun with 2 1 of growth mediumand the eluant volume was

restored to 2 1 after

25 min. and 40 min.

40 to 50 ml/min. at 50 to 55 min. after first

of the

When the cell density of g. coli K 12 Hfr and F- had reached a

of 3

was first

Two liters

and used as the eluant (1.2).

deposited cn a Polyvic vinyl

were

broth and then adapted to minimal medium( a

modified C-salts medium(2)).

Synchrony.

K 12 in which synchrony

and Methods

supplied by Dr. A. L. Taylor.

Bedford, Mass.)

of the ycungest

with 5. -coli K 12 could be eliminated if a different

type of membranewere utilized.

ing 5-liters

with

occurred on the membrane. We considered the possibility

that this difficulty

first

synthesis

cm macromolecular

12 remained on the filter

K

time (unpublished results),

kindly

12 in which

did not bind to the membranein the manner described

Instead of eluting

population

especially

This yielded a flow rate of

commencingelution.

40 minutes, about 80 percent of the Hfr strain 472

Within the

and 91 to 93 percent

Vol. 41, No. 2, 1970

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

eluted from the membrane. Samples for analysis of synchrcny

of F- strain were collected

at 50 to 55 min. which corresponded to the generation times

of these organisms. This time of collecticn to yield Counting.

has been previously

shown (1.2)

optinmm synchrony. Cell number and sine distribution

were determined using a

Coulter Counter Model B, a 35 u aperture tube and a Model J Automatic Particle Size Distributicn

Analyzer (1,2,6). Results and Discussion

The synchrony achieved for -E. coli

SYNCHRONIZATION

I2 Hfr and F' is illustrated

K

OF

E.COLI

I

I

1

I

20

40

60

a0

MINUTES

in

K12

I

I

100

120

INCUBATION

Figure 1. Synchronization ofE. coli K 12. For the Hfr strain, 2-l at 5 x lOy/mlwere deposited cm tEe membraneyielding a synchrcnous populatiq with a cell density of about 1 x 107/m1. For the T strain, 2-l at 1 x 10 /ml were used yielding a synchronous pcpulaticm with a cell density of 6 x 106/ml. 473

Vol. 41, No. 2, 1970

Fig. 1.

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

As expected, for about the first

in cell number occurred;

the bacteria

40 minutes of growth, little

then doubled in number during the next

20 minutes and synchrcny persisted for at least two generations.

SIZE

OISTRISUllOH

DURING

IELATIVE

increase

SYNC~EONOUS

CUSIC

In general,

GROWTH

MlCllONS

of the synchronously dividing populations shown Figure 2. Size distribution in Fig, 1. Note that at 52 and 53 minutes, both strains displayed a broad size distribution and that the I- strain size distribution was biphasic. The vertical dotted lines indicate the midpoint of the exponential size distributions. 474

Vol.

41, No.

BIOCHEMICAL

2, 1970

these results

agreed with

those

AND

obtained

Sampling the Hfr strain

was complicated

action

self

of the pili

property

(71,

may also account

membrane; the Hfr yielded 7 to 9 percent minutes

it

the

in cell

This

titers,

bound to the Polyvic bound whereas

that

only

the first

40

in synchrony the degree of

number is only one criterion

collectian,

cells

again were smaller, as expected.

time

for

In Fig. 2,

the selected cells were distributed sine distribution.

The

and after one generation time, the The size distribution

of the

ane generaticn time (52 min.) was, in fact,

About half the cells were in the

synchrony.

change in cell size (2.6).

increased in size with

biphasic.

size range and the other half in

smallest

This could only occur in a synchronously dividing

the larger range.

B/r,

in the F- strain.

cells

K 12 F- after

at higher

of the cells

range of the exponential

smallest

--E. coli

due to the inter-

number of cells

1) and is an indication

can be noted that just after

within

occurred

with

in the number of cells

must be accompanied by a periodic

This

that

COMMUNICATIONS

remained on the membrane after

This is evident

increases

by the fact

about 20 percent

achieved is best

Periodic

(1.2)

for the greater

under the same conditionscfig. synchrony

RESEARCH

previously

agglutination

of the F- cells

of elutian.

BIOPHYSICAL

popula-

tion, The results presented here indicated that -E. coli K 12 can be synchronized by the membraneselection subject to better alteration alterations

technique.

Whether or not F- strains

synchrony than Hfr strains is not clear.

of the minimal growth mediumcould yield

better

are intrinsically

It may be that synchrony and such

are being investigated. Ackncmledgements

The work reported here was supported by a grant from the U. S. Public Health Service AI-06472. References 1.

Helmstetter,

608 (1964).

C.

E.

and Cummings,D.

475

J.,

Biochim.

Biophys. Acta, 82,

Vol. 41, No. 2.1970

2. 3. b, 5. 6. 7.

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPt-lYSfCAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Cummings,D. J,, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, E, 41, (1965). Maaloe, 0., and Kjeldgaard, "Control of Macromolecular Synthesis," H. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York (1966). Helmstetter, C. E., and Cooper, S., J. Mol. Biol. 3l, 507 (1968). Clark, D. J., and Maaloe, O., J. Mol. Biol., 23, 99 (1967). Helmstetter, C. E., J. Mol. Biol., 2, 417 (1967). Brinton, C. C. Jr., Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 27, 1003 (1965).

476