Synthesis and characterization of a composite polymeric material including chelating agent for adsorption of uranyl ions

Synthesis and characterization of a composite polymeric material including chelating agent for adsorption of uranyl ions

Accepted Manuscript Title: Synthesis and Characterization of a Composite Polymeric Material Including Chelating Agent for Adsorption of Uranyl Ions Au...

1006KB Sizes 54 Downloads 180 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Synthesis and Characterization of a Composite Polymeric Material Including Chelating Agent for Adsorption of Uranyl Ions Authors: Selc¸uk S¸ims¸ek, Zeynep Mine S¸enol, Halil ˙Ibrahim Ulusoy PII: DOI: Reference:

S0304-3894(17)30418-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.059 HAZMAT 18618

To appear in:

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

30-12-2016 30-5-2017 31-5-2017

Please cite this article as: Selc¸uk S¸ims¸ek, Zeynep Mine S¸enol, Halil ˙Ibrahim Ulusoy, Synthesis and Characterization of a Composite Polymeric Material Including Chelating Agent for Adsorption of Uranyl Ions, Journal of Hazardous Materialshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.059 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Synthesis and Characterization of a Composite Polymeric Material Including Chelating Agent for Adsorption of Uranyl Ions Selçuk ŞİMŞEK1,#, Zeynep Mine ŞENOL2, Halil İbrahim ULUSOY3 1

Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, 58140 SIVAS, TURKEY

2

Cumhuriyet University, Zara Vocational School, Department of Food Technology, 58140 SIVAS, TURKEY

3

Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, 58140 SIVAS, TURKEY

Highlights    

A new adsorbent including a powerful chelating was developed for effective uranyl. Characterization was carried out by FTIR, EDX, SEM, UV-VIS-NIR, and PZC technical. As we know, this is the first application for grafting of CCA to a polymeric matrix. CCA-g-PAA can be used as potential adsorbent for removal or pre-concentration of uranyl.

Abstract In this study, a versatile polymeric material was synthezed by grafting Calcon Carboxylic Acid (CCA), which is known as a chelating agent for some metal ions, to polyacrylamide (PAA) structure. Thus, the adsorptive properties of inert PAA polymer were significantly improved owing to this procedure. The obtained new material, CCA-g-PAA, was characterized by point zero charge (PZC), FTIR, SEM, and UV-VIS-NIR analysis. The adsorption properties of new material were investigated comprehensively and experimental variables were optimized such as pH, temperature, time, and concentration. Experimental data were evaluated by using therotical adsorption models. The maximum adsorption capacity of material was calculated as 0.079 mol kg-1 by considering Langmuir equation. The constants calculated from Freundlich and DR model were found as 6.98 and 0.441, respectively. Adsorption kinetic was also explained with pseudo second order and intra particular diffusion models. Experimental studies were showed that adsorption was endothermic and occured spontaneously. The developed material has important advantages such as reusability, cost-effective synthesis procedure, high adsorption capacity, and selectivity. Keywords: Uranyl; adsorption; polyacrylamide; calcon carbocylic acid 1. Introduction Needs for new energy sources have a vital importance in the developing countries since industrial evaluation. Conventional energy sources including crude oil cause seriously

environmental problems. So, important of various alternatives sources such as wind, sun, nuclear energy is increasing every day. Among these sources, nuclear energy is preferred as a clean energy and it is primer source in a lot of developed country. Uranium is the most used elements as a radioactive source. But it is difficult to obtain it due to limited reserves and expensive costs. So, it is generally produced from seawater, wastes of nuclear plants by recovery and preconcentration. For example, seawater includes 3.3 ppb uranium and this is important amount for recovery studies [1]. By increasing usage of radioactive elements including uranium as energy source causes spreading of toxic and dangerous chemicals to environment. The main reasons of this contamination are leaks from nuclear plants, accidents, and natural sources. This circumstance threats both human health and environment. A lot of study showed that uranium species mainly exist as uranyl form (UO22+) in the aquatic medium [2]. These ions can accumulate at organs and tissues by forming stable complexes with various biochemical molecules in the huma body. In addition, it causes a lot of negative circumstances like cancer, organ failure, and finally death. So, removal of uranium species is very important and attracts great attention due to their negative effects on the human health [3]. Most used conventional methods for recovery or pre-concentration of uranium species are adsorption [4], precipitation [5], membrane filtration [6] and biological accumulation [7]. Among these approaches, adsorption is mostly preferred in last decades owing to positive advantages. In the adsorption, ion or molecules in the solution or gas phase are retained on a solid surface through physical or chemical interaction. Mechanism of adsorption is fairly complex, but it is very useful method with easy applications. Especially, if the concentration of target species is very low and so recovery of these species is so expensive and laborious with conventional methods, the adsorption is first preference method with simplicity, cost effectivity, and environmental friendly. So, it is one of the most studied research areas for removal of toxic species. The first step of adsorption studies is focused on developing a suitable, accessible, reusable, and cost-effective adsorbent for target species. Kinetic of adsorption should be fast in order to shorten recovery time. The most used adsorbents are carbon [8, 9], zeolite [10], clay [11], composites [12] and natural polymers [13] and synthetic polymers [14,15]. Polymers are mainly preferred owing to changeable structural properties according to target species. Selectivity of polymer adsorbents can be increased by using specific molecules having functional groups. Chelating groups having high affinity for metal ions can be grafted to a

polymeric sturucture by a physical or chemical way. So, a useful material is obtained for selective adsorption of some target ions. This approach is one of the popular research area at last decades. Moreover, this method is not limited only with metal ions. There are a lot of studies about development of selective and effective material for organic molecules such as dyes, pesticides, and drugs [16]. The aim of this study is to develop a new material for selective and effective removal of uranyl ions. Calcon carboxylic acid molecule having potential for strong complex formation was grafted to polyacrylamide structure which is an inert material for uranyl ions. CCA [1-(2hydroxy-4-sulfo-1-naphtylazo)-3-naphtolic acid] can coordinate with uranyl ions through its azo-nitrogen and phenolic oxygen sites. 2. Experimental 2.1 Reagents All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade. Calcon carboxylic acid, acrylamide monomer, N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide (Bis–AA) , N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl ethylenediamine (TEMED) and 4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol (PAR) were purchased from Sigma (St. Loius, MO, USA). UO2 (NO3)2.6H2O and the remaining of the chemicals were obtained from Merck (Germany). Ultra-pure water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm was used during all experiments produced by a Labcanco water purification system. All experiments were performed in duplicates and within ±5% experimental error limit. 2.2. Characterization and Instrumentations The fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis were done to study the functional groups in the range of 400-4000 cm-1 using modified FTIR spectrophotometer (Bruker, Tensor II) in KBR pellets. The concentration of uranyl ions was determined using modified spectrometric method mentioned at section 2.4 by means of a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). This spectrophotometer has a wavelength accuracy of ±0.2 nm and a bandwidth of 2 nm in the wavelength range of 190–1100 nm. A pH meter with a glass-calomel electrode (Selecta, Spain) was used to measure the pH values. A centrifuge (Hettich Universal) was used to accelerate the phase separation. A thermostated water bath (Nuve NT 120, Turkey) was used in order to keep constant the temperature. 2.3. Preparation of new composite, CCA-g-PAA

For synthesis of CCA-g-PAA, 10 g of acrylamide (AA) monomer and 0.2 g of cross linker (N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide) were weighed and dissolved in 10 mL of water. 400 mg of CCA was added onto this mixture and stirred on a magnetic stirrer. Then, 300 mg of ammonium persulphate was added as starter agent. Polymerization reaction was sustained by adding 200 μL of N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine at room temperature. The obtained new composite was washed with ultrapure water and the ethanol for several times in order to remove non-grafted reagents. After then, it was dried, ground, and sieved by obtaining a homogene material. 2.4. Determination of uranyl ions in the solution The concentration of uranyl ions was determined by using the modified PAR method as spectrophotometrically [17]. In this method, uranyl ions are formed a selective complex with PAR (4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol) at pH 8.5. For this purpose, 3.5×10 -3 mol L-1 of PAR was prepared in Tris/HCl buffer (pH 8.5). Then, 50 µL of sample solution was added to 3 mL of PAR solution and the absorbance of the formed complex was followed at 530 nm. After a calibration graph was plotted, the concentration of uranyl ions was determined in the supernatants. 2.5. Adsorption studies Adsorptive

features of the developed adsorbent were investigated for UO 22+ ions. For this

purpose, 0.1 g of the adsorbent were equilibrated with 10 mL of UO 22+ in the concentration range of (0.37 - 3.70) ×10-3 mol L-1. The adsorbent–solution systems were equilibrated for 24 h at 298 K in a thermostatic water-bath and equilibrium solutions aqueous phase were obtained by centrifuging at 2.500 rpm for 5 min. The concentration of uranyl ions was determined as explained in section 2.4. 2.6. Point of zero charge and pH dependence of adsorption The determination of point of zero charge (PZC) was done to investigate the surface charge and acidic-basic character of adsorbent. For that 0.1 mol L-1 KNO3 solution was prepared and its initial pH was adjusted in the range of 1-12 by NaOH and HCl. Then 10 mL of KNO3 and 0.100 g adsorbent were interacted in test tubes. The samples were kept at 25 ºC for 24 hours and the final pH of solutions was measured by using a pH meter. The graph was plotted using initial versus final pHs and point of zero charge was determined by the obtained experimental results.

3. Result and Discussion 3.1. Characterization of new material The characterization of new material was carried out by ATR, UV-VIS-NIR, SEM, and EDX technicals.
The characteristic peaks of PAA and CCA were shown in the Figure 1a. When it was analysed the Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) spectra belong to PAA, CCA, and CCA-gPAA structures, it can be seen that the desired CCA-g-PAA material was obtained successfully. More detailed comments about PAA material were presented in our previous study [18]. By considering this study, if it was focused on the ATR spectrum of CCA-g-PAA, a new peak can be seen at 1050 cm-1. In addition, the intensities of peaks at 1120 and 1190 cm-1 was became equal while they had different intensity in PAA structure. This change is also one of the evidences for grafting of CCA to PAA structure. Because, a change occurred in the chemical bonds of PAA during synthesis process. UV-VIS-NIR measurments were also used for more detailed characterization. It can be seen in the Figure 1b that all of PAA, CCA, and CCA-g-PAA structures have high reflectance intensity. Uranyl adsorbed CCA-g-PAA was also compared in order to see the change of reflectance intensity in UV-VIS region. Because, the color of new material is changed when it adsorps uranyl ions. So, it can be said that it works as a sensor. The reflectance of PAA and CCA-g-PAA shows difference significantly. At this region, the reflectance of CCA-g-PAA decreases while PAA’s reflectance is high still. The colors of CCA and PAA are pink and white, respectively. After CCA was grafted to PAA structure, the color of new material, CCA-g-PAA, turns to more dark and its reflectance decreases. Lighther color means more reflectance. The color of CCA-g-PAA is darker when it adsorps uranyl ions. All of these evidences showed that grafting of CCA to PAA structure and adsorption of uranyl ion by this material were performed successively. [19]
EDX and SEM instruments were also used for more detailed structural analysis of CCAg-PAA and results were shown in Figure 2. SEM view at seconder electron mode was presented at Figure 2a. It is clearly seen that there are distinctive changes in the images at back scattered electron mode (BSE, Figure 2b). The brightness is increased in some zone due to high atomic

mass of uranium and this provides the existing of uranium in the structure after adsorption. The obtained EDX diagram which presents the elemental composition of surface was given in the Figure 2c. The characteristic peak of uranium (Mα 3.17) can be seen next to gold peak which is used for plating of material. Moreover, the elemental composition of surface was also given in Table 1. In addition, as a result of EDX analysis, red points are demonstrated the zones where uranyl was adsorbed in the material (Figure 2d). This also provides adsorption of uranyl ions. 3.2. Influnce of pH to adsorption A series solutions having different pH in the range of 1-7 were prepared by using diluted HCl and NaOH. Test tubes including 50 mg of CCA-g-PAA and 100 mg L-1 uranyl ion were treated with these solutions. pH is one of the main parameters effecting the achievement of adsorption process. Because, both surface charge of adsorbent and ionic charges of species in the medium are depend on pH. The mobility of the other ions in the medium is affected by concentration of H + ions. Moreover, it also affects interest and capacity of adsorbent for target species. There is always a competition between H+ ions and target species depending on pH in the medium [20]. Espicially, if there are polyanionic or polycationic species in there solution, interactions are fairly affected by pH of medium. As a results of this experiments, it was observed that the adsorption of uranyl ions on surface of CCA-g-PAA was low at acidic pHs and then increased by pH (Figure 3a). This circumstance can be explained by two ways. Firstly, the charge of surface is changed by pH. Point of zero electric charge (PZC) experiments also showed that surface charge of adsorbent is negative beyond pH 5.5 and positive the pHs below 5.5 (Figure 3b) [21]. So, surface charge is going to negative by increasing pH. Then, as expected, adsorption of cationic uranyl ions increased in these pH values. Uranyl ions can precipitate at alkaline pHs as expected. So, it was not studied pHs beyond 7.0. Secondly, a lot of study showed that uranyl ions exist as hexavalent UO22+ ions at low pHs. This cationic ion can competite with H + ions and this competition is more at low pHs. This affect decreases with increasing pH. Initial pH of uranyl solutions used in adsorption studies was measured in range of 4-6.
3.3. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherms obtained from experimental results and harmony of this data with therorical adsorption models (Langmuir, Freundlich, and DR) were illustrated in Figure 4. The required equations and calculated parameters for these models were given in Table 2. Nonlineer regression method was applied to results in order to see the harmony between experimental results and theorical models.
As a resuts of this study, the experimental results are suitable with L-Type adsorption isotherm by considering Giles classification. In view of r 2 values which show the harmony of results to adsorption model, the best explanation for adsorption can be given with Langmuir model. According to this model, the surface of adsorbent is homogeny and monolayer [22]. So, the adsorption is increased by concentration until active center on surface is fulled by analyte ions. The adsorbed amount reaches a platue and equilibrium with increasing concentration. Q value as a measure of monolayer adsorption capacity and K value which shows adsorption energy can be calculated by using this model. The possible mechanism about binding of CCA on PAA structure and complex formation of uranyl ions by using active groups of CCA-g-PAA were presented in Figure 5. As can be seen in Figure 5, the peak intensities at 1120 and 1190 cm-1 were became equal by grafting of CCA into PAA. Increasing of peak intensity at 1190 cm-1 can be explained by new C-O bonds. Moreover, Milikan charges of atoms in CCA structure were theroticaly calculated and the most likely mechanism for adsorption process was illustared as given in Figure 5. The adsorption process drives with complex formation between nitrogene and oxigene atoms. So, it is reached to the maximum adsorption capacity when all groups fulled on the surface. This amount equals to the maximum adsorption capacity which can be easily calculated by using isotherms. The color of adsorbent changed due to forming complex between uranyl ions and active centers on the surface of material. This changing was determined by optical microscope and showed on the Figure 4. Color of adsorbent was light pink before adsorption, then it changed to dark purple by adding uranyl ions and kept constant for a day. After uranyl ions were striptted by 1 M HCl it changed to original form (light pink).


Freundlich model explains the tendancy of adsorption as hyperbolic plot and submits important informations about heterogenty of surface. n value which in the range of 0 and 1 is accepted as a measure of this heterogenty [23]. It is accepted that heterogenty of surface is increased if n value approaches to 1. D-R model is related with energy of adsorption. In this model, it is accepted that the adsorption is over when monolayer fulled. The mechanism of adsorption can be proposed by using EDR values obtained from isotherms. According to this evaluation, the interactions between adsorbent and uranyl ions may be chemical based on ion-exchange or complex formation or physical interactions based on van der waals forces. If E DR value is lower than 8 kj mol-1, the adsorption is physical and chemical [24]. Experimantal results showed that adsorption of uranyl ions on CCA-g-PAA is based on chemical interactions by using ionexchange mechanism. PAA as a hydrogel is an inert material and does not include active center for uranyl adsorption. After CCA molecule is grafted to PAA structure, new active centers are formed on surface. The adsorption capacity of new material was found as 40 mg g -1 by considering the amount of CCA in the unit structure. 3.4. The studies about adsorption kinetic The effective parameters in the design of adsorption process may be counted as adsorption capacity, selectivity, kinetic mechanism for adsorption and desorption. Especially, it is important how long does time takes in order to complete the adsorption. For this purpose, it is important to know initial rate of adsorption, half-time of adsorption, rate constant of reaction. Primer and seconder interactions proceed together in both adsorption and desorption procedures. Dissoaciton of solvent-ion (dehydration), transferring of molecules to surface, forming of a thin-film layer on the surface, diffusion to pores in the material including pore, charge transfer on the surface, intraparticular diffusion are carried out in this process. All of these events can be performed together or individually. In this study, a series experiment was studied at constant concentration and temperature in order to investigate the effect of time on the adsorption process. Various kinetic models such as pseudo first order, pseudo second order ve intraparticle diffusion were applied to experimental results [25]. The therotical equations and kinetic parameters for all model were

submitted at Table 3. According to these studies, experimental data are not consistence with pseudo-first-order model as can be seen in the Figure 6.
It was observed that r2 values, which show the harmony of experimental data to model, greatly deviated from pseudo first order model. So, it is impossible to explain the adsorption kinetic with this model. The r2 values belong the other model were more suitable to evaluate the kinetic mechanism of adsorption. Pseudo second order model is generally an ideal model to explain adsorption kinetic if initial concentrations are too low. It was showed the most oftenly used form in Table 3. In this table, qt and qe shows the adsorption amounts at t time and equilibrium, k2 shows rate constant of pseudo second order which is a function of initial concentrations and related with diffusion to solid surface, and h shows initial rate. The closness of experimental q e values and therotical qe value derivied from models is used to explain the ideal model for adsorption model [26]. Results showed that the adsorption of uranyl ions on CCA-g-PAA structure can be explained with pseudo second order models. Theorical and experimental q e values are fairly close each other. Namely, a part of adsorption kinetic is a result of a chemical reaction carried out on surface. The other parameters calculated by pseudo second order were also given in Table 3. Another model used for explanation of adsorption kinetic is intraparticular diffusion model which can successfully explain the adsorption phenomenon. A lot of studies in the literature showed that the lineer regression of intra particular diffusion model does not generally pass from origin and multilineer [27]. This explains that the adsorption process is drived a film formation on surface and intraparticular diffusion steps. The harmony between experimental data and models was summarized in the Table 3 with related parameters. Results showed that it is not enough to explain the kinetic of adsorption by using only a theorical model. Adsorption kinetic can be explained by pseudo second order and intra particular models together. The surface of adsorbent is quickly fulled at initial by chemical interactions, and then intraparticular diffusion process starts slowly. 3.5. The effect of temperature on adsorption and thermodynamic parameters

Thermodynamic parameters are also used to explain the mechanism of adsoption. The calculated entropy value gives important informations whatever the adsorption happens spontaneously. The effect of temperature on adsorption was studied in order to obtain the required data for calculation of thermodynamic parameteters. Adsorption is fairly complex event ongoing with other mechanism in the medium. So, it is difficult to determine the properties about adsorbent and adsorbed species by using thermodynamic parameters. These parameters are generally given as a measure of all adsorption process. For example, enthalpy which shows direction and size of energy flow throughout adsorption process while entropy is an expression of disorder in the system. Gibbs enthalpy is used whatever an event can be take place spontaneously or not. Adsorption of uranyl ions on CCA-g-PAA structure were studied at three different temperature (278.15, 298.15, and 313.15 K) in order to examine the effect of temperature. The distribution coefficients (Kd) were derived from [28,29]; 𝐾𝑑 =

𝑄 𝐶𝑒

The free energy of adsorption (ΔG0) is related to K. ΔG 0 = −𝑅𝑇𝑙𝑛𝐾𝑑 The value of enthalpy changes (H0) and entropy changes (S0) for adsorption was calculated using equation in below; 𝑙𝑛𝐾𝑑 =

ΔS 0 ΔH 0 − 𝑅 𝑅𝑇

Thermodynamic parameters obtained from Figure 7 were presented in Table 4.
Results showed that the adsorption process is endothermic and spontaneous. So, the entropy of system increases throughout adsorption. Endothermic process does not only cover the transferring of uranyl ions to surface of solid but also it contains other steps such as dehydration, dissoaction, complex forming, and transferring on surface. These events were illustrated in Figure 8. On account of, all process needs heat in order to make start adsorption process. Namely, the adsorption of uranyl ions onto solid surface creates energy deficiency and this energy causes comsumption from solution.


Likewise, both enthalpy and entropy cover all process during adsorption. As a result of experimental studies, an increase was observed at entropy as expected. Entropy is determined by dissocation in solution phase during transferring of ions to solid surface and assosication events in the solution. The calculated positive entropy means that disorderness increases throughout adsorption process. Dissassocaiton of water molecules from hydratized uranyl ions causes an increase at entropy. The aquatic form of uranyl ions has a fairly complex structure. A lot of studies showed that the molecular structure of hydratized uranyl ions is changed by pH of solution and the most existing form is covered five water molecule in the first shell and ten water molecule in second shell [30]. In the adsorption process, a ligand changing can be carried out by losing a few water molecule or ion-exchange is possible. If the amounts of individual energy is known in this events, it can be explained reason of increasing in total energy. Gibbs free enthalpy was found negative as expected and that means the adsorption process goes spontaneously. 3.6. Recovery Experiments and reusability of new material Recovery studies were carried out by various solvents in order to strip retained uranyl ions on adsorbent surface. After 200 mg L -1 of uranyl ions were equlibried with 100 mg adsorbent, aqua phase was removed by using a pipette. Then, 1 mL of solvent including 1 M HCl, 1 M HNO3, 1 M NaOH and ethyl alcohol was added and vortexed for 60 s. By following seperatio of solid phase, the amount of uranyl ions in the solvent were analysed by the method explained in section 2.5. Results of this study were illustrated in Figure 9. As can be seen from the figure, the highest recovery was obtained with HCl and NaOH solutions.
Recovery values obtained with ethanol were so low. Namely, the adsorbed uranyl ions could not stripted with ethanol solvent. This explains that the adsorption is based on chemical mechanism because the retention of uranyl ions on adsorbent surface carry out by covalent binding. Acidic or basic solvents can easly desorb the adsorbed ions by ion-exchange mechanism. 3.7 Selectivity The model solutions including several ions [Cu(II), Mn(II), Fe(III), Hg(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), Co(II), Pb(II)] at equivalent concentrations (0.06 mol L -1) were prepared in order to investigate the selectivity of new syhntezied material. The concentration of metal ions was

determined by ICP-OES. As a result of experimental studies, it was observed that none of adsorption % for metal species was not over 15 % if adsorption of uranyl ion was accepted 100 %. 4. Conclusions In this study, the grafting a chelating molecule, CCA, to an inert hydrogel, PAA, structure was successfully carried out for first times and its characterization was made by SEM, FTIR and UV-VIS-NIR. Newly developed adsorbent, CCA-g-PAA was examined for uranyl adsorption. Experimental variables were investigated and optimized conditions were determined by using model solutions. Adsorption of uranyl ions could be achieved in their natural pHs and mechanism of process was explained by considering surface charge. As a result of experimental studies, it was found that process goes with L-type adsorption model and Langmuir adsorption capacity was calculated as 0.079 mol kg -1. The constants calculated from Freundlich and DR model were found as 6.98 and 0.441, respectively. The obtained results were explained in the related sections. A table was added in order to compare the proposed method with literature. As can be seen in the Table 5, the adsorption capacity of new material is comperable with the other material. The using potential of new adsorbent as a sensor with color change, adsorption rate, cost effective removal of uranyl ions are important advantages of this study. Moreover, the amount of active molecule providing adsorption (CCA) is so low in the unit mass. In the similar studies, more chaleting agent was grafted to structure, so cost of the obtained material is not cost effective. Whereas, similar adsoption capacity was obtained in our study by using too low active molecule. Finally, we achieved to synthese a material both cost effective and having high adsorption capacity.
The kinetic mechanism of adsorption was also studied by using various kinetic model such as lagargen, pseudo second order, and intraparticular diffusion. Thermodynamic parameters were determined and commented in the related sections. Results showed that adsorption process is endothermic and spontaneously. Recovery and re-usability of material were tired by using various solvents in order to strip adsorbed uranyl ions. After stripping experiments, the material was obtained without any deformation and loss capacity. New developed material can be used as potential adsorbent with high capacity in order to removal

or recovery of uranyl ions from various medium such as sea water, wastewater, waste of mining etc. Acknowledgments The present study was partly supported by Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects Commission. The authors have declared no conflict of interest. The authors gratefully thank to Dr. Ali Özer for SEM images and Prof. Dr. Ebru Şenadım Tüzemen for UV-VIS-NIR measurments. This study was carried out in Cumhuriyet University Advanced Technology Research Center (CUTAM).

References 1. H.İ. Ulusoy, Determination of trace uranyl ions in aquatic medium by a useful and simple method, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 302 (1) (2014) 497504. 2. L.S. Keith, O.M. Faroon, B.A. Fowler, Uranium, in: M. Berlin, R.K. Zalups, B.A. Fowler (Eds.), Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, Academic Press, Denmark, 2007, pp. 880-903. 3. A.P. Gilman, D.C. Villeneuve, V.E. Secours, A.P. Yagminas, B.L. Tracy, J.M. Quinn, V.E. Valli, R.J. Willes, M.A. Moss, Uranyl nitrate: 28-day and 91-day toxicity studies in the sprague-dawley rat, Toxicol. Sci., 41 (1998), pp. 117-128 4. H.İ. Ulusoy, S. Şimşek Removal of uranyl ions in aquatic mediums by using a new material: Gallocyanine grafted hydrogel, J. Hazard. Mater., 254 (2013), pp. 397-405 5. T.K. Tokunaga, Y. Kim, J. Wan, L Yang Aqueous uranium (VI) concentration controlled by calcium uranly vanadate precipitates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46 (2012), pp. 7471-7477 6. E.M. Wylie, K.M. Peruski, J.L. Weidman, W.A. Phillip, P.C. Burns Ultrafiltration of uranyl peroxide nanclusters for the separation of uranium from aqueous solution, Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (2014), pp. 473-479

7. T. Reitz, A. Rossberg, A. Barkleit, R. Steudtner, S. Selenska-Pobell, M. Merroun Spectroscopic study on uranyl carboxylate complexes formed at the surface layer of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, Dalton Trans., 44 (2015), pp. 2684-2692 8. M. Carboni, C.W. Abney, K.M.L. Taylor-Pashow, J.L. Vivero-Escoto, W. Lin Uranium sorption with functionalized mesoporous carbon materials, Am. Ceram. Soc., 52 (2013), pp. 15187-15197 9. Z. Li, F. Chen, L. Yuan, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, Z. Chai, W. Shi Uranium (VI) adsorption on graphene oxide nanosheets aqueous solutions, Chem. Eng. J., 210 (2012), pp. 539-546 10. S. Şimşek, U. Ulusoy Uranium and lead adsorption onto bentonite and zeolite modified with polyacrylamidoxime, J.Radional. Nucl. Chem., 292 (2012), pp. 41-51 11. B. Campos, J. Agular-Carrillo, M. Algarra, M. Gonçalves, E. Rodriguez-Castellon, J.C.G.E. Silva, I. Bobos Adsorption of uranyl ions on kaolinite, montmorillonite, humic acid and composite clay material, Applied Clay Sci., 85 (2013), pp. 53-63 12. S. Şimşek Adsorption properties of lignin containing bentonite-polyacrylamide composite for UO22+ ions, Des. and Water, 57 (2016), pp. 23790-23799 13. M. Monier, D. A. Abdel-Latif Synthesis and characterization of ion-imprinted resin based on carboxymethyl cellulose for selective removal of UO 22+, Carbohydr. Polym. 97.2 (2013), 743-752. 14. S. Şimşek, E. Yılmaz, A. Boztuğ Amine-modified maleic anhydride containing terpolymers for the adsorption of uranly ion aqueous solutions, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 298 (2013), pp. 923-930 15. S. Şimşek, H.İ.Ulusoy, Effective mercury removal using a new developed polymer containing 2-(2′ thiazolylazo) p-cresol, Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 15-11 (2016) 23472356. 16. M.T. Yagub, T.K. Sen, S. Afroze, H.M Ang Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: A review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 209 (2014), pp. 172-184 17. T. Laussman, R. Eujen, M. Weisshuhn, U. Thiel, G. Vogel Structures of diphosphomyo-inositol pentakisphosphate and bisdiphospho-myo-inositol tetrakisphosphate from Dictyostelium resolved by NMR analysis, Biochem. J., 315 (1996), pp. 715-720 18. U. Ulusoy, S. Şimşek, Ö. Ceyhan Investigations for modification of poliacrylamidebentonite by phytic acid and its usability in Fe3+, Zn2+ ve UO2+ adsorption, Adsorption, 9 (2003), pp. 165-175

19. S. Zhang, M. Ye, S. Chen, A. Han, Y. Zang Synthesis and characterization of mica/γCe2-xYxS3 composite red pigments with UV absorption and high NIR reflectance, Ceram. Int., 42 (2016), pp. 16023-16030 20. S.M. Ghoreishi, M. Behpour, S. Mazaheri, M. Motaghedifard High sensitive sensor based on carbon nanotube electrode for determination of lanthanum in the presence of calcon carboxylic acid, Anal. Lett., 46 (2013), pp. 156-170 21. L.S. Cerovic, S.K. Milonjic, M.B. Todorovic, M.I. Trtanj, Y.S. Pogozhev, Y. Blagoveschenskii, E.A. Levashov Point of zero charge of different carbides, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 79 (2007), pp. 1-6 22. C.F. Chang, C.Y. Chang, K.H. Chen, W.T. Tsai, J.L. Shie, Y.H. Chen Adsorption of naphthalene on zeolite from aqueous solution, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 277 (2004), pp. 29-34 23. W.J. Weber, E.H. Smith Simulation and design model for adsorption processes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 21 (1987), pp. 1040-1050 24. Parker H.L, Budarin V.L., Clark J.H., Hunt A.J., Use of Starbon for the Adsorption and Desorption of Phenols, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1 (2013) 1311-1318 25. W. Plazinski, W. Rudzinski, A. Plazinska Theoretical models of sorption kinetic including a surface reaction mechanism: A review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 152 (2009), pp. 2-13 26. Y.S. Ho, G. McKay Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes, Process Biochem., 34 (1999), pp. 451–465 27. F.C. Wu , R.L. Tseng, R.S Juang, Initial behaviour of intraparticle diffusion model used in the description of adsorption kinetics, Chem. Eng. J., 153 (2009), pp. 1-8 28. I. Anastopoulos, G.Z. Kyzas, Are the thermodynamic parameters correctly estimated in liquid-phase adsorption phenomena?, J. Mol. Liq. 218 (2016), pp. 174-185. 29. A. Rahmani-Sani, R. Shan, L. Yan, A. H. Bandegharaei, "Response to Letter to Editor: Minor correction to the thermodynamic calculation using the distribution constant by Shan et al. and Rahmani-Sani et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 325 (2017), pp. 367. 30. S. Tsushima, Hydration and water-exchange mechanism of the UO22+ ion revisited: the validity of the “n+1” model, J. Phys. Chem. A., 111 (2007), pp. 3613-3617 31. M.G. Mahfouza, A.A. Galhouma, N.A. Gomaaa, S.S. Abdel-Rehemc., A.A. Atiad, T. Vincentb, E. Guibal Uranium extraction using magnetic nano-based particles of diethylenetriamine-functionalized

chitosan:

Chem.Eng. J., 262 (2015), pp. 198–209

Equilibrium

and

kinetic

studies,

32. S. Chatterjee, V.S. Bryantsev, S. Brown, J.C. Johnson, C.D. Grant, R. Mayes, B.P. Hay, S. Dai, T. Saito Synthesis of naphthalimidedioxime ligand-containing fibers for uranium adsorption from seawater, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55 (2016), pp. 4161-4169 33. S. Şimşek, U. Ulusoy Adsorptive properties of sulfolignin–polyacrylamide graft copolymer for lead and uranium: Effect of hydroxilamine–hydrochloride treatment, React. Funct. Polym., 73 (2013), pp. 73-82 34. C. Özeroglu, N. Metin Adsorption of uranium ions by crosslinked polyester resin functionalized with acrylic acid from aqueous solutions, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 292 (2012), pp. 923–935 35. L. Li, F. Huang, Y. Yuan, J. Hu Praparation and sorption performance of magnetic 18crown-6/Fe3O4 nanocomposite for uranium (VI) in solution, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 298 (2013), pp. 227-235 36. S.A. Sadeek, E.M.M. Moussa, M.A. El-Sayed, M.M. Amine, M.O.A. El-Magied Uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) adsorption studies on chelating resin containing pentaethylenehexamine as a functional group, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 35 (2014) pp. 926-933 37. M.F. Hamza, M.G. Mahfouz, A.A.-H. Abdel-Rahman Adsorption of uranium (VI) ions on hydrazinyl amine and 1,3,4-thiadiazol-2(3 H)-thion chelating resin, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 33 (2012), pp. 1544-1551 38. A.M. Starvin, T.P. Rao Solid phase extractive preconcentration of uranium (VI) onto diarylazobisphenol modified activated carbon, Talanta 63 (2004), pp. 225–232 39. S. Seyhan, M. Meralivan, N. Demirel Use of o-phenylene dioxydiacetic acid impregnated in Amberlite XAD resin for separation and precontration of uranium (VI) and thorium (IV), J.Hazard. Mater., 152 (2008), pp. 79-84 40. Q. Song , L. Ma, J. Liu, C. Bai, J. Geng, H. Wang, B. Li, L. Wang, S. Li Praparation and adsorption performance of 5-azacytosine-functionalized hydrothermal carbon for selective solid-phase extraction of uranium, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 386 (2012), pp. 291-299 41. Y. Wang, Z. Gu, J. Yang, J. Lia, Y. Yang Amidoxime-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes by plasma techniques for efficient removal of uranium (VI), Appl. Surf. Sci. 320 (2014), pp. 107-114 42. C. Lee, J.S. Kim, M.Y. Suh, W. Lee, A chelating resin containing 4-(2-thiazolylazo) resorcinol as the functional group: synthesis and sorption behaviour for trace metal ions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 339 (1997), 303–312

43. J. Fasihi, S. Ammari Alahyari, M. Shamsipur, H. Sharghi, A. Charkhi Adsorption of uranyl ion onto an anthraquinone based ion-imprinted copolymer, React. Funct. Polym. 71 (2011), 803–808

Figure 1: (a) ATR Spectra of PAA, CCA and CCA-g-PAA; (b) UV-Vis-NIR of PAA, CCA, CCA-g-PAA and Uranyl adsorbed CCA-g-PAA Figure 2: (a) SEM view at seconder electron mode, (b) SEM view at backscatter electron mode, (c) EDX spectrum (d) EDX map. Figure 3: (a) pH dependence of the adsorption, (b) PZC plots of CCA-g-PAA Figure 4: Experimentally obtained adsorption isotherms UO22+ and their compatibility to Langmuir, Freundlich and DR models Figure 5: The possible reaction mechanism of grafting process and binding of uranyl ions onto CCA-g-PAA Figure 6: Compatibility of UO22+ adsorption kinetics to pseudo-first-order model, pseudosecond-order model and intraparticle diffusion model. Figure 7: The effect of temperature on the adsorption. Figure 8: Illustrative explanation of increase at entropy Figure 9: Recovery percent of various solvent for desorption of uranyl ions

100

80

T%

60

40 1050 cm-1 CCA PAA CCA-g-PAA

20

1190 cm

(a) 0 4000

1120 cm-1

3000

2000

-1

1000

Wavenumbers cm-1 60

50

R%

40

30

CCA-g-PAA PAA Uranyl adsorbed CCA-g-PAA CCA

20

(b) 10 500

1000

1500

2000

Wavelenght/ nm

Figure 1. (a) ATR Spectrum of PAA, CCA and CCA-g-PAA (b) UV-Vis-NIR spectrum of PAA, CCA, CCA-g-PAA and uranyl adsorbed CCA-gPAA

Figure 2. a) SEM view at seconder electron mode, (b) SEM view at backscatter electron mode, (c) EDX spectrum (d) EDX map.

Q x 102/ mol Kg-1

7

(a) 6

5

4

3

2

1 0

2

4

6

8

pHi

pHf

12

6

10 8

(b)

6

4

4 2

2

0 2

4

6

8

pH

0

10

12

14

pHi

0 4

6

8

10

pHi

12

-2

-4

Figure 3. (a) pH dependence of the adsorption, (b) PZC plots of CCA-g-PAA

Figure 4. Experimentally obtained adsorption isotherms UO22+ and their compatibility to Langmuir, Freundlich and DR models

Figure 5: The possible reaction mechanism of grafting process and binding of uranyl ions onto CCA-g-PAA

0

10

20

t0.5

30

40

5

6

5

4

Q x 102 / mol Kg-1

Q x 102 / mol Kg-1

6

4 3 3 2

Experimental Pseudo first order Pseudo second order Intraparticle diffusion

1

2

0 0

200

400

600

800

1 1200

1000

t / dk

Figure 6. Compatibility of UO22+ adsorption kinetics to pseudo-first-order model, pseudosecond-order model and intra particle diffusion model.

lnKe

9.6

9.4

9.2

9.0

8.8

8.6

8.4

8.2 3.0

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8 T

-1

3 -1 x10 /K

Figure 7. The effect of temperature on the adsorption.

Figure 8. Illustrative explanation of increase at entropy

80

% Recovery

60

40

20

0 HCl

NaOH

HNO3

Ethyl Alcohol

Figure 9. Recovery percent of various solvent for desorption of uranyl ions

Table 1: The elemental composition of Uranyl adsorbed CCA-g-PAA Element

Weight %

Atomic %

N

18.38

23.83

O

65.87

74.76

Au

12.74

1.17

U

3.02

0.23

Table 2: Mathematical equation of isotherm models and adsorption parameters. Model

Equation

Parameters

Q L K L Ce Qe = 1 + K L Ce

Langmuir

Qe =

Freundlich

K F Cen

−KDR ε2

QL

KL

R2

0.079

2537

0.92

KF

n

R2

6.98

0.661

0.887

QDR

KDR

EDR

R2

0.441

6.1 10-9

9.05

0.900

Qe = QDR e

Dubinin-Raduskevich

QL: Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity (mol kg-1), KL: Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mol-1), KF: Freundlich constants, n: Intensity of adsorption (n represents the heterogeneity of the adsorptive surface), K DR; DR constant related to the sorption energy (mol 2 K J-2), QDR: DR adsorption capacity (mol kg-1), ε: Polanyi 1 potential given with 𝜀 = 𝑅𝑇𝑙𝑛 (1 + 𝐶 ), R: Ideal gas constant (8.314 J mol-1 K-1), T: absolute temperature (298 K), 𝑒

Free energy change (E; J mol-1) required to transfer one mole of ion from the infinity in the solution to the solid surface was then derived from E= (2KDR)-1/2.

Table 3. Mathematical equations of kinetic models and kinetic parameters of adsorption. Model

Pseudo-first-order

Pseudo-second-order

Intraparticle diffusion

Equation

Parameters

−k1 t

qt = qe [1 − e

qt =

1 t ]+[ ] qe k 2 q2e

𝑞𝑡 = 𝑘𝑖 𝑡 0.5

Qe

k1

R2

0.044

0.041

0.069

0.667

Qexp

Qe

k2

t1/2

H

R2

0.044

0.043

2.566

9.05

4.75 x 10-3

0.816

---

---

ki

R2

---

---

6.48 x 10-4

0.869

]

t [

Qexp

qt: The adsorbed amounts at time t (mol kg-1), qe: The adsorbed amounts at equilibrium (mol kg-1), k1 (dk-1), k2 (mol-1 kg min-1), and ki (mol kg-1 min-1) are the rate constants, initial adsorption rate, H (mol kg-1min) for pseudosecond-order is also calculated from H= k2Qe2

Table 4: Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption ΔH0/ kJ mol-1

ΔS0/ J mol-1 K-1

-ΔG0/ kJ mol-1

R2

16.32

128.62

21.98

0.999

Table 5. Comparision of various adsorbent with chelating agent for removal of UO 22+ ions

Matrix Polyacrylamide Magnetic Chitosan nanoparticles Polyethylene Polyacrylamide Polyester resin Fe3O4 Glycidyl methacrylate/divinylbenzene Acrylonitrile-divinyl benzene Acrylonitrile-divinyl benzene Activated carbon Amberlite XAD Hydrothermal carbon Multi walled carbon nanotube Polystryne- divinylbenzene Polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate Polyacrylamide

Chelating agent Gallocyanine Diethylenetriamine Naphthalimidedioxime Sulfonated lignin Acrylic acid 18-crown-6 ether pentaethylenehexamine Hydrazinyl Amine

Capacity (molkg-1) 0.030 0.744 0.129 0.190 0.340 0.337 0.422 0.870

References [3] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37]

1,3,4-Thiadiazol-2 (3 H)-thion

0.726

[37]

diarylazobisphenol o-phenylene dioxydiacetic acid 5-azacytosine Hydroxylamine 4-(2-Thiazolylazo)-resorcinol 1-Hydroxy-2-(prop-20-enyl)9,10-anthraquinone CCA

0.870 0.121

[38] [39]

0.630 0.610 0.005 0.051

[40] [41] [42] [43]

0.079

This study