Tetrahedron: Asymmetry Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 23432346.1993 Ritcd in Gnat Britain
Synthesis
09574166193 .%.0&.00 PergamonpnrrLtd
of
Acids
C- a-D-Glucosyl-a-amino
M K G-jar*, Indian Institute
A S hbinkar and M Syamb of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India
(Received in UK 15 September 1993)
Abstmct
: The Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation of s-allyl-U-D-glucopyranoside with variety of ligands and its application to synthesise c-a -D-glucosyla -amino acids have been described. C-Glycosylamino of their
ability
chemical
stability,
developments* very
little
they. are
that work
we believe
that
acids
to withstand
(1) arose accepted
on C-glycosylamino
acids
is a significant
In our previous
because
of the
cial
Ieve+.
communication4,
significantly
introduction
In continuation,
as shown in scheme as an ideal
allylglycoside
inhibitors’.
alternate
because
of their
In spite
andE-glycosylamino encountered
to develop
primarily
virtue
acids,
of many practically
in literature3. and versatile
high
Therefore, protocols
to-
acids (Il.
(ADH) of ally1 D-glucopyranosides has been
scope
been
years
By the
glycosidase of g-
has
in recent
of hydrolysis.
as potential
in the synthesis
there
interest
process
have occurred
wards C-glycosylamino
reaction
considerable
the biological
precursor
we described
to prepare improved
of reagents we planned
1. The proposition for the target
in terms such as
the
AD-mix-o
I, was based Scheme - 1
dihydroxyiation Since
simplicity
then
ADH5
and predictability
and AD-mix-g
at the
commer-
of c-glycosyl-
a -amino
acid
the enantiomerically
(Ill).
2343
asymmetric
derivatives.
of efficiency,
retrosynthesis
to prepare molecule
the Sharpless
glucosylglycerol
(I)
pure diol (II), serving
on the application
of ADH on c-
M. K. GURJARet al.
2344
The
preparation
cosepentaacetate ward
of s-ally1
(1) and 7
exercise
. Subsequently,
by employing
NaH-BnBr
representative
examples
2,3,4,6-tetra-g-acetyl-cc-D-glucopyranoside
allyltrimethylsilane
in the
2 was deacetylated
combination
in dry
of the present
presence
under DMF to
ADH study Scheme
Zemplen provide
(scheme
(2) from
of BF3:OEt2 condition
2).
- 2
MO BnO
0
’
C
(b)
(i)
NaOMe,
Treatment merit
MeOH,
mixture
into
the
The
HPLC
Py,
of 3 with of dials
mono
TBS-ether
analysis
RT,
(lrl),
70”,
3h,
2h, 96%; L&and,
O”-RT,
DMF,
NaH,
ISh,
70-85%;
in I:1 t-BuOH-H20
In order
(6/7) or the
of 6/7
(ii)
BnBr,
R=H R=TBS R=fr
Oo-RT,
d) TBS-Cl,
ISh,
92%; (c)
Imid.,
CH2C12,
to determine
the
mono trityl-ethers
on a chiral
column
(chira-ccl
at O”-RT for ratio,
4/5
18 h gave
a diastereo-
were
converted
selectively
(S/9) by adopting
standard
procedures.
OD,
8% isopropanol/n-?exane,
Table
Entry
Substrate
Ligand
Product 2R
Yield
I
3
AD-mix-
61
39
73%
3
DHQD-9-0phenathryl ether
78
22
83%
3
3
DHQD-p-CIbenzoate
64
36
84%
4
3
DHQ-9-Ophenanthryl
41
59
75%
ether
DHQD-J-Ophenanthryl
70
30
70%
ether
2
8
2s
2
5
OR
90%.
AD-mix-B
(B/5).
dLl
2
R=fr
K3Fe(CN)6,tBuOH-H20
RT, )h; 75%; e) TrCI,
c
R = TBS
1
c x
R=H
l dLk
Ref.6,
OH 7
+
-
h
OsOp
cell
OAc
I
a)
benzylated
2 and 3 formed
-F
C
D-glu-
a straightfor-
and then
3. Compounds
b L
was
UV
C-a-D-Glucosyl-a-amino
228 nm) resolved Since
the
other
cinchona
Indeed
the
mixture
diastereofacialselectivity alkaloids,
ADH reaction
tion of TBS-ethers On the
other
expected,
the
(6/7) showed with
reverse
by
and multigram separated
instance,
derivative,
the
oxidation
and
10% Pd-C at
formed
36 h, followed
for
acid derivative
a) (i) Py,
the hope to improve ether
with
gel column
esterification I atm
into
reaction
was
the
ADH
to utilise
StereOSekCtiVitY8.
by derivatisa-
78:22 as judged by HPLC.
4) as ligand,
ratio
1, Table).
we decided
2) followed
in the ratio,
3 demonstrated,
41:59 for 6/7.
the diastereomeric
Both these
converted
group
(entry
(entry
~-o-glucosyla-amino
trityl
of 61:39 (6/7) (entry
Other
as
exmaples
in the Table.
scale,
displacement
ratio
improvement
by silica
8 was first
of 10 over &amino
significant
diastereofacialselectivity
to nucleophilic
Jones
with
DHQ-9-0-phenanthrylether
into the corresponding For
azido
ligands,
pure (2R)-8 and (2S)-9 isomers.
subjected
the
was only moderate,
AD-mix-6
with 2 and 3 are included
(8/9) were cleanly
dently
with
as chiral
On a preparative merically
to provide
of 3 with DHQD-9-g-phenanthryl
hand,
of ADH reactions tives
efficiently
2345
acids
removed providing
in methanol
by conventional
mixture
of trityl
chromatography, products
ether
deriva-
thus providing
enantio-
transformed
indepen-
were then
acid derivatives. the with
mesyl
by using the
containing acetylation
derivative
with
NaN3-DIMF at
80% aqueous
azido
ester
acetic
(IO).
1.2 equivalent with
MsCl-Py
120“. From
Ac20-Py
and then
the
resulting
acid
followed
Exhaustive
of Boc20 to give
reduction
was then pero-c-glucosyl-
(11)9.
MsCI, CH2C12, O”-RT, 3h; (ii) NaN3, DMF, 120”, 3h, 35% (from 81, (iii) 80% AcOH,
SO”, 2h, 70%; (iv) Jones reagent, (b) (i) Pd-C,
EtOH, BOC20,
In a similar (13) -via the
azido
Oa-RT,
Ih; (v) CH2N2,
H2 (1 atm), 36 h, 7096; (ii) Ac20-Py,
fashion, ester
MeCOMe,
compound
substrate
9 was
also
12, by following
converted essentially
EtOEt,
O”, 30 min, 63%,
O”-RT, ISh, 90%. into
the s-glycosylamino
identical
reaction
acid
conditions.
M.K. GUIUAR~~ al.
2346
In the
preceding
g-glycosylamino
acids.
acids
upon the g-alkenylglycosides
depending
lines,
we have
The process
described
a simple
in principle
could
used
and versatile
be expanded
as substrates.
approach to other
This study
to synthesise
C_glycosylamino is under
progress.
Adawwledgments We acknowledge References 1.
UGC, New Delhi for Junior
Wittman,
V.;
July 5-10,
1992, pp 268.
Kunz,
3.
a)
4.
Gurjar,
5.
a) Sharpless,
Kessler,
H.;
K.B.;
H.-L.;
V.;
Horton,
8.
a) Jacobsen,
Morikawa,
D.; Miyaki, E.N.;
1988,
Lubben,
110,
D.;
3.;
for
Wang,
from
4.34
Lett.
= 6.75
Hz);
b) Ogino,
2H), 4.92 (t,
[a],
12.5 Hz),
+36 4.23 (m,
8.5 Hz); [o]D +42
IICT Communication
Paris-France,
Z.-M.;
Res.
Crispino,
G.A.;
Hartung,
X-L.;
J.
J.; Jeong,
K-S.;
Chem.
1992,
Org.
1992, 48, 10515.
Co. Inc.
1988, 184, 221. Chen,
Tetmhedmn
lH,
H.; Lett.
K.B. J. Am. Chem.
G.; Sharpless,
Manoury,
E.; Shibata,
1991,
5761;
(c 1.0, 2H),
lH,
6
J = 2.2,
41,
T.;
c) Oi,
Beller,
R.;
M.;
Sharpless,
1.40 (s, 9H), 2.01 (s, 6H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 13.5 Hz),
J = 9.0 HZ), 5.16 (t, CHC13);
b) Data
for
lH,
II:
‘H
4.21 (dd,
lH, J = 4.4,
J = 9.0 Hz), NMR (200
5.28 (d,
4.39 (m,
IH),
4.91
(t,
IH,
J = 8.3 Hz),
13.5 lH,
J
MHz, CDC13):
2.08 (s, 3H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 4.06 (dd,
(c 1.0, CHC13).
No. 3263
Engl.
1990, 525.
W.S.; Schroder,
Y.;
Ed.
1992, 3, 21.
Xu, D.; Xhang,
Chem.
Int.
Chem.
1992, 33, 2095.
6 1.43 (s, 9H), 2.04 (s, 6H), 2.0,
Y.L.;
13: 1H NMR (200 MHZ, CDC13):
(m,
Symposium,
M. Angew.
Asymmetry,
I.; Mungall,
K.B.,
Kottehan,
E.; Synthesis,
Aldrich
2.07 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.96 (dd, Hz),
Carbohydrate
K.B.; Tetrahedron,
T.; Carbohydr.
1968;
M.;
W.; Bennan,
Sharpless,
Marko,
Sharpless,
K.B. Tetrahedron a) Data
Kock,
Tetrahedron
Amberg,
was purchased
7.
International
G.; Purkner,
AS.
57, 2768; b) Kolb, H.C.; AD-mix+
XVIth
Wittman,
M.K.; Mainkar,
Kwong,
9.
to ASM.
award
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 294.
H.; Angew.
Kesseler,
H.;
1992, 31, 902; b) Simchen,
Sot.
Fellowship
and Notes
2.
6.
Research
5.18 (t,
IH,
J =
IH,
J =