Synthesis of doxorubicin-PLGA loading on chitosan stabilized (Mn, Zn)Fe 2 O4 nanoparticles: Biological activity and pH-responsive drug release studies Wararat Montha, Weerakanya Maneeprakorn, Nattha Buatong, I-Ming Tang, Weeraphat Pon-On PII: DOI: Reference:
S0928-4931(15)30424-0 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.098 MSC 5810
To appear in:
Materials Science & Engineering C
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
14 June 2015 3 September 2015 28 September 2015
Please cite this article as: Wararat Montha, Weerakanya Maneeprakorn, Nattha Buatong, I-Ming Tang, Weeraphat Pon-On, Synthesis of doxorubicin-PLGA loading on chitosan stabilized (Mn, Zn)Fe2 O4 nanoparticles: Biological activity and pH-responsive drug release studies, Materials Science & Engineering C (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.098
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Synthesis of doxorubicin-PLGA loading on chitosan stabilized
PT
(Mn, Zn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles: Biological activity and
RI
pH-responsive drug release studies
SC
Wararat Montha a, Weerakanya Maneeprakornb, Nattha Buatonga, I-Ming Tangc,
a
NU
Weeraphat Pon-On a,*
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
c
National Nanotechnology Center, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
MA
b
Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Kasertsart University
*
AC CE P
TE
D
Bangkok10900, Thailand.
Corresponding author:
[email protected] Tel.:662 562 5555 ext. 3008-3011; Fax: 662 942 8029
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2
Abstract We have synthesized Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 ((Mn, Zn) ferrite) magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs)
PT
having radius of 25 nm to act as platforms for delivering drugs. The Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 MNPs They were
RI
exhibits superparamagnetic behavior with large saturation magnetization (Ms).
SC
encapsulated in polymer in order for them to be developed into PLGA-coated chitosan stabilized (Mn,Zn) MNPs, i.e., DOX-PLGA@
[email protected] as an effective carrier of the anti-
NU
cancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) whose release would be controlled by the pH in the environment
MA
surrounding the cancer tumor. The structure of the as-prepared particles is of a magnetic coreencapsulated by polymer shell layer of around 50 nm thick. At a pH of 4.0, the DOX release
D
within the first 5 hr. is fast (around 57%). It becomes slower (around 46% over the next 25
TE
hours) when the pH is increased to 7.4. The DOX-PLGA@
[email protected] (for concentrations lower than 125μgmL-1) showed lower toxicity against HeLa cells that using DOX
AC CE P
only. When the DOX-PLGA@
[email protected] is increased to 250μgmL-1, the DOXPLGA@
[email protected] show greater anti-cancer activity and has satisfactory therapeutic effect. The slow sustained release of the DOX by the drug loaded particles while they are in the physiological pH environment (7.4) of normal tissues and mild toxicity of DOX against cancer cell at low concentration point to the DOX loaded PLGA@
[email protected] being safely used for treating cancer. The higher dosage of DOX needed to kill the cancer cells will be released when the synthesized carriers are subject to the pH stimuli surrounding these cells.
Keywords: drug delivery systems; pH responsive; magnetic particles; controlled release
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3
1. Introduction The possible use of nano particles as platforms for delivery of therapeutic drugs has
PT
recently emerged [1-11]. Much of the research on these drug delivery systems (DDSs) have
RI
been for the treatment of cancer. The research has center on overcoming the main obstacle to the treatment of cancer by chemotherapy, i.e., the destruction of healthy tissue by the therapeutic
SC
agents. To overcome this, nanoparticle delivery systems have been developed which have a
NU
specific (size) distribution of anticancer agents and which have a mechanism to trigger the release of the therapeutic agents so that the drug release would only lead to an accumulation of
MA
the agents at the tumor sites. The typical materials in the platforms used primarily for drug delivery are either polymer or inorganic materials or combinations of these two materials. These
TE
D
materials are then mixed with the anti-cancer drug in a way such that they will be released in response to the physiological environment surrounding a tumor (internal stimuli).
AC CE P
During the past ten years, great efforts had been devoted to synthesizing stimuli-sensitive nanoparticles that would release the agents when certain values of a stimulus based on some physiological parameters (internal stimuli) such as pH, glucose or enzyme etc [12-20] were encountered. Special attention has been paid to the development of pH responsive nano-particle materials since the pH surrounding different types of tissues are different. The pH in the environment surrounding cancer cells is around 6.5 while the value around acidic organelles is around 4.0 to 5.0 [12,18, 22]. As the drugs are released from the DDSs into the acidic region, the toxicity of the drug in the other parts of the body will be lessen. In addition to external stimuli, external stimuli such as light, magnetic field, heat and ultrasound have been employed to make the particles more useful for applications in the biomedical fields [11-13, 21]. Use of an externally applied magnetic field gradient to increase
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4
the accumulation of drug in the target region, one must have magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). The magnetic materials for these DDSs must be biodegradable and be able to release the drugs in Such a material that is the most
PT
response to internal stimuli (endo/lysomal condition).
RI
commonly used material in biomedical applications, are the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) [23-29]. In the present study, we have chosen Mn and Zn substituted
SC
ferrite (Mn1-xZnxFe2O4) nanoparticles since they can be easily made to have a small size and the
NU
high magnetization needed for them to respond to an external magnetic field [29, 30]. Furthermore, Li et al. [30] reported that Mn-Zn ferrite embedded in a polymer matrix exhibited
MA
low Tc (Curie temperature) close to the body temperature which would be useful for clinical viability and safety.
TE
D
To achieve the required pH sensitive controlled release properties, we have pick chitosan (CS) as the agent for triggering the release of the therapeutic agents. There is widespread
AC CE P
interest for its potential application in DDSs [31-41] due to them being biodegradable and being a biocompatible cationic polymer with low toxicity. Javid et al [35], Unsoy et al [36], Deng et al [37] and Hu et al [38] reported that chitosan-coated super paramagnetic iron oxide and silica nanoparticles showed better doxorubicin (DOX) drug-loading, pH controlled release, enhanced cancer cell uptake and inhibition cancer cell growth after exposure to the doxorubicin. To improve the effectiveness of this drug, we have coated chitosan stabilized (Mn,Zn) MNPs with Poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolic acid (PLGA). PLGA is a FDA approved biocompatible and biodegradable polymer [42-44]. For PLGA application, Sivakumar et al. [45] studied on SPION and curcumin encapsulated HER2 targeted PLGA and found that they displayed promising potential anticancer activity by destroying pancreatic cancer cells. Functionalize PLGA by chitosan nanoparticles have been widely used for the delivery carrier of various chemo-therapeutic agents
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5
to the target site [39-44]. Utilizing the above interesting properties, we aimed to synthesis the anti-cancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) into the PLGA-coated chitosan stabilized (Mn, Zn) ferrite (DOX-PLGA@
[email protected]).
We
have
characterized
the
PT
nanoparticles
RI
physicochemical properties and biological effects of the (DOX-PLGA@
[email protected]) particles and compared them with those of the free drug. To further investigate the drug delivery
SC
application, we studied their pH stimuli controlled release to see whether they would be an
NU
effective doxorubicin (DOX) anti-cancer drug carrier, i.e., released the doxorubicin (DOX) at the target sites.
MA
2. Materials and methods 2.1 Materials
TE
D
Ferric chloride (FeCl3 anhydrous), Manganese nitrate (Mn (NO3)4H2O) and zinc nitrate ((Zn (NO3))2 6H2O) were obtained from UNIVAR (Australia). The sodium dodecyl sulfate
AC CE P
(SDS), Na2SO4, citric acid, and ethylene glycol (EG) were obtained from Fluka (Switzerland). Glutaraldehyde (UNILAB) and Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) 85/15 with molecular weight of approximately 190,000-240,000, Chitosan (CS, deacetylation degree 90%, Mv 3.8x105) with 3-[4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and other biological reagents, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). 2.2. Fabrication of the PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite nanoparticles. The PLGA-coated chitosan stabilized (Mn, Zn) ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized in a two-step process based on the electric attraction between the positively charged (–NH3+) ions on surface of the chitosan and the negatively charged carboxyl groups (–COO-) radicals of the PLGA. First, chitosan coated citric acid functionalized (Mn, Zn) ferrite nanoparticles are made. The chains on the chitosan are needed for the formation of the layer which would be sensitive to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6
the pH stimuli. To stabilize surface and to increase the drug adsorption by the colloidal CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite nanoparticles, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) was coated onto them
PT
to form the core-shell (PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite nanoparticles. The inclusion of PLGA
RI
assisted in making the outer shell biodegradable.
2.2a. Preparation of chitosan-stabilized (Mn, Zn)Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
SC
Magnetic Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles were made using the chemical co-precipitation
NU
method with x value adjusted from 0.1 to 0.9. Typically, 50 ml of mixed solution containing manganese nitrate (Mn(NO3) 4H2O), zinc nitrate ((Zn(NO3))2 6H2O) and ferric chloride in their
MA
respective stoichiometry were first prepared. 10 ml EG and 5 ml HCl (0.2M) was then added into the mixture under vigorous stirring. The solution was then stirred for an addition 30 min at room
TE
D
temperature. Then, in a 250 ml three-neck round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, 3 g NaOH and 0.54 g SDS was dissolved in 25 ml of distilled water at 80°C for 30 min. The
AC CE P
precursor solution was injected into the flask slowly and the stirring was continued for another 30 min under N2 at 80°C. The precipitate was collected by exposing the final solution to them to an external magnetic field. The concentrated precipitates were physically removed from the solutions and washed three times with ethanol and deionized water. They solutions were then freeze dried to obtain the nanoparticles. We used the MNPs having the highest magnetic moments as determined by our VSM measurement (Fig. 3). Our next step was the fabrication of the chitosan-stabilized (Mn, Zn)Fe2O4 particles (CS@Mn1-xZnxFe2O4) and the detailed procedures combined with previous reports [20, 30, 40].
We selected x = 0.1, i.e., Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 as the magnetic
precursor. Surface modification of these magnetic nanoparticles was carried out by first treating it with citric acid. Citric acid (CA) (0.05M) and the Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 NMPs were mixed together in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7
a three-neck round-bottom flask having a magnetic stirring bar inside. The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 85°C under N2 atmosphere. At the end of reaction, the carboxylic functional magnetic
PT
particles were washed with deionized water for three times. The synthesized nanoparticles were
RI
freeze-dried and stored at -20°C for further studies.
The chitosan stabilization was achieved by dispersing the CA-modified Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4
SC
nanoparticles into 15 ml of chitosan solution (CS) (1g of chitosan dissolved in 100ml of 2.5 wt%
NU
acetic acid). This was achieved by rapidly stirring the mixture using a magnetic stirrer for 30 min at room temperature. At the end of the mixing, 3ml glutaraldehyde solution (GD, 25wt %) was
MA
added in the solution and stirred for an addition 4 hr. Finally, the CS-stabilized magnetic nanoparticles were collected by magnetic bar and washed three times with ethanol and deionized
TE
D
water, respectively. The obtained products were by freeze dying and stored at -20°C for further studies.
AC CE P
2.2b. Preparation of PLGA-coated chitosan stabilized (Mn, Zn)Fe3O4 nanoparticles and doxorubicin drug loading (DOX-PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite). 50 mg CS-modified Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 nanoparticles were added to a solution of PLGA (50mg in 0.5ml chloroform) and doxorubicin (1mg/ml). This was mixed with a magnetic stirrer for 4 hrs. The mixture was then stirred continuously overnight at 4°C so that the organic solvent (chloroform) would evaporate.
The DOX encapsulated PLGA@
[email protected] nano
particles were collected by centrifugation with the supernatant being collect so that the concentration of drug remaining in it could be determined. The resulting products were freezedried and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C for further investigations. 2.3
Physicochemical
characterization
(Mn, Zn)Fe3O4 nanoparticles
of
the
PLGA-coated
chitosan
stabilized
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8
The crystal structures of the synthesized powders were determined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker diffractometer, Model D8 Advance) using the Cu Ka radiation and
PT
operating at 40 kV with 40 mA current. The XRD patterns were scanned from 2θ = 20°-70° at a
RI
scanning speed of 1 s per step with an increment of 0.037° per step. For the FT-IR absorption measurements of the with and without DOX-loaded PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite, the powders
SC
were mixed with KBr and pressed into pellets under a pressure of 10 tons for 1 min. The pellets
NU
were analyzed using a FT-IR spectrophotometer (Spectrum GX, Perkin Elmer) which performed 16 scans over the range 370-4,000 cm-1. The magnetic properties of PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn)
MA
ferrite particles were measured using a room temperature VSM (vibrating sample magnetometer (Lakeshore, Model 4500)). Meanwhile, the core-shell particles were also examined by a
D
transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL model JEM-2010). Dynamic light scattering
TE
(DLS) with the concentration of 0.5 mg mL-1 was utilize to record hydrodynamic radius at 25°C
AC CE P
using DLS, Zetasizer nanoseries model S4700 (Malvern instrument, UK)). The chemical composition of the PLGA@CS@(Mn,Zn) ferrite nanoparticles was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy (Senterra Raman microscope; Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) using an excitation wavelength of 532 nm at 5mW. Raman spectra were recorded in the range 450070 cm-1. 2.4
Cell culture and cytotoxicity analysis Human cervical cancer cells (HeLa cells) were cultured onto 25 ml flask using a culture
medium (RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin G and 100 mg/ml streptomycin). The cultured cells were kept at 37
C in a humidified CO2 incubator during
cultivation and during the experiments. Cytotoxicity analysis was conducted on HeLa cells. The cultured
cells
were
treated
with
different
concentrations
of
doxorubicin
loaded
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9
PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96 well plates and allowed to grow overnight at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. The culture medium was then replaced
PT
with fresh medium containing nanoparticles in the range of concentrations 0-50 g(Fe)/mL.
RI
The cells were then allowed to grow for a further 24 h at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. The wells
SC
were then washed with PBS to remove any excess nanoparticles and replaced with fresh medium containing the Presto Bluecell viability reagent (Life Technology) according to the
NU
manufacturer’s specifications. The treated cells were incubated for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. The fluorescence of each well was measured in a microplate reader at an excitation
MA
and emission of 560 and 590 nm, respectively. The fluorescence intensity is directly proportional to the number of viable cells in the well. Experiments were performed in triplicate and results
TE
D
were normalized to control conditions (cells that were not exposed to nanoparticles). A negative control where cells were exposed to 0.1% Triton-X-100 instead of the nanoparticles was used in
AC CE P
each experiment.
2.5 In vitro release studies
The in vitro study of pH controlled DOX release from the PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles was performed as follows: First, 1mg of DOX-PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles were placed in 15 mL of phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (pH=7.4 and 4.0) with the
temperature
at
37°C.
The
lengths
of
time
that
the
DOX
released
PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles were kept in the PBS solution were then varied (the time periods being 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, 15, 20 and 25 hrs). At the end of each time period, the supernatant was taken out. The concentration of the DOX was determined using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Jenway, model 6405) operating at a wavelength of 480 nm. The drug content in supernatant is determined by comparing the measured absorbance to a standard curve for the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10
DOX adsorption. The DOX release experiments were performed in triplicate and the amount of DOX released at each time point was determined as a mean value ± standard derivation (SD).
PT
3. Results and discussion
RI
3.1 Material characterization
SC
Figure 1 shows the powder XRD patterns of as-prepared magnetic Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles. The XRD patterns show that the (Mn, Zn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites have a single phase
NU
cubic spinel ferrite structure and do not exhibit any undesirable crystalline phase. The diffraction
MA
peaks at about 30.2, 35.6, 43.0, 57.1 and 62.5° corresponds to index of (220), (311), (400), (511) and (440), respectively, are clearly observed, which are the peaks of ferrite [29, 30], matching
D
well with the JCPDS file of PDF 00-022-1012, 01-089-6609, 01-070-8731, 01-089-7556 and 01-
TE
086-0509 for Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles with x value adjusted from 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9, respectively. In addition, the variation of the lattice parameters of 8.46 Å (x=0.1), 8.44 Å
AC CE P
(x=0.3), 8.45 Å (x=0.5), 8.44 Å (x=0.7) and 8.42 Å (x=0.9) are observed. A decrease in lattice parameter with further substitution of Zn atoms can be explained by substitution of bigger Mn2+ ions (0.91 Å) by smaller Zn2+ (0.74 Å) ions [29]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to investigate the magnetic core and polymer shell of the samples. As seen in Fig 2(a), the as-synthesized magnetic nanoparticles show a monodispersed spherical morphology with a uniform size of 25 nm. In Fig 2(b), the coreshell structure of PLGA@
[email protected] can clearly be seen. Dark particles of about ~20 nm surrounded by polymer shells of 25-30 nm thickness are clearly seen in each particle. On the basis of the images, most of the magnetic nanoparticles appear to have a double shell composed of a modified biodegradable external shell of PLGA and an internal pH responsive shell of CS on the surface of the (Mn, Zn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites. Next, the average diameter of particles measured
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11
by DLS was about 368 nm at 25°C. The hydrodynamic size of PLGA@
[email protected] from DLS (Fig. s1) was larger than those determined from TEM. This could possible due to the
PT
shrinkage of the hydrate layer in the dry environment present during the TEM measurements.
RI
The room-temperature magnetization curves of (Mn, Zn)Fe2O3 and PLGA@CS@ferrite are
coercivity (Hc) or remanent magnetization (Mr).
SC
shown in Fig. 3. The magnetic hysteresis curves of the synthesized particles do not exhibit any They do however exhibit a saturation
NU
magnetization MS showing that that all the (Mn, Zn) ferrites possess super paramagnetic
MA
properties at room temperature. We see that the saturation magnetization MS of Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 systems depend on the Mn/Zn ratio. The Ms gradually decrease with the increase of the Zn2+
D
dopants (a non-magnetic ion) (Figure inset). The change in Ms is due to the influence of the
TE
cationic stoichiometry and occupancy of cations in specific sites. The Ms of Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 (56.1 emug-1) nanoparticle is higher than that of PLGA@
[email protected] (13.2 emug-1)
AC CE P
nanoparticles (Fig. 4). The cause of this is the presence of the polymers shell in the latter nanoparticles. Even though the magnetizations of the PLGA@
[email protected] would be less than that of the uncoated substrate, the PLGA@
[email protected], the nano particles still have good magnetic responsiveness (Fig. 4 inset). This means that these coated nano particles can still be affected by an external magnetic field, opening up the possibility of them being targeted to sites by applying an external magnetic field to locations where the pH is not the physiological neutral 7.0. The
FTIR
spectra
of
PLGA@
[email protected]
and
DOX-
PLGA@
[email protected] are shown in Fig 5. The characteristic peak at around 3500 cm-1 corresponded to the O-H stretching band [39]. The characteristic peaks of chitosan in the region around 3431cm-1 ascribed to the N-H group bounded to the O-H group are also seen [40]. The
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12
peaks at 1632 cm-1 and 1560 cm-1 are due to the amide I and II bonds, respectively [40]. The characteristic peak at 1761 cm-1 corresponds to the C=O stretching vibration of lactone in PLGA
PT
[39, 40]. With respect to the PLGA@
[email protected], the amide I and II bands of the absorbed CS are shifted to higher wave numbers (1635 cm-1 and 1569 cm-1). The two new peaks
RI
appearing at 1652 cm-1 and 1586 cm-1 account from the electrostatic interaction between the two
SC
polymers (CS and PLGA) [39, 40] and are the characteristic peaks due to the presences of the –
NU
NH3+ and –COO- radicals. The FTIR analyses were performed in order to account for the DOX loading efficiency on PLGA@
[email protected]. The spectra of DOX alone shows multiple
and 1071 cm-1 (C-O) [35].
MA
peaks at 2932 cm-1 (C-H), 1730 cm-1 (C-O), 1618 cm-1 and 1577 cm-1 (N-H), 1414 cm-1 (C-C) These peaks are also present in the FTIR spectrum of DOX-
results
indicate
that
TE
D
PLGA@
[email protected] , i.e., 2929 cm-1 (C-H) and 1717 cm-1 (C-O), respectively. These the
DOX
had
been
successfully
loaded
onto
the
AC CE P
PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles. In addition, the composition of synthesized particles was investigated by Raman spectroscopy (Fig s2.). The PLGA spectrum of due to the C-O stretching vibrations show peaks at 1771.5cm-1, 1147cm-1 and 1044cm-1. Furthermore, the C-H bending and stretching vibrations are observed at 1453 cm-1and 870 cm-1, respectively. In the spectrum of CS, the strong band corresponding to stretching vibrations of amide bond is confirmed at 1380 cm-1 [46]. 3.2 Drug release The in vitro drug release of DOX from the loaded PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticle was carried out at pH values of 7.4 and 4.0 over 25 h at 37°C. As a control, different pH values were used to simulate the drug release of pH-sensitive nano carriers in normal tissues and tumor tissues conditions, respectively. Figure 6 shows the DOX release rate is pH dependent,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13
increasing as the of pH values decrease. The two behaviors are observed as: an initial small burst release during the first five hour. This is followed by sustained release after fifth hour. The initial
PT
burst release of DOX is attributed to the release of DOX molecules attached to the surface of
RI
particles. As seen for the case of pH = 7.4, the drug release rate is relatively slow (the initial burst release is only about 34.26 %.) and then it slow down after 5h. The accumulated release amount
4.0
is
much
faster
and
more
complete.
The
burst
release
from
the
NU
is
SC
is less than 46.60% after 25h. The release of the nanocarriers when the pH of the buffer solutions
PLGA@
[email protected] particles during the first five hours is about 57.18%. The faster
MA
drug release rate in lower pH medium can be attributed to two factors: one is the loose nanoparticle structure which causes the stronger protonation of the free amino groups of chitosan
TE
D
and the enhancement of PLGA degradation when the pH is low; the other is the higher solubility of DOX at lower pH [35, 36]. The drug release rate from nanoparticles is reduced with the
AC CE P
increase in the pH value of dissolution medium. It is usually assumed that the release of the drug in given by some power law dependence. In the Peppas’s model): [47], the release is given by
Mt kt n M0
(1)
where M t and M o are the concentration of drug released into a medium up to time t and the initial concentration of drug on the particles. M t M 0 is the fractional concentration of the release drug. We have applied a regression analysis to fit Peppas’s model to the data given on Fig. 6 to Eqn, (1). The result fitting shown have correlation coefficients Rc of 0.938 and 0.947 when the pH value of medium is 7.4 or 4.0, respectively. The important parameter obtained from power law is the value of n which provides information on the nature of the transport
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14
mechanism. The regression analyses give the values of n of 0.14 and 0.09 for the two pH values of medium, respectively. Values of n being between 0 and 0.5 indicate that that the transport
PT
process for the DOX release is a Fickian diffusion [47]. The values obtained indicated that at
RI
both pHs, the DOX release from PLGA@
[email protected] is controlled by the diffusion
SC
process. This means that the DOX inside the particles would be stable with very little leakage into the blood when they are circulating in normal blood, thus reducing its toxicity to normal
NU
tissue. Upon reaching the targeted tumor site which has a weakly acidic environment, the DOXPLGA@
[email protected] MCPs would be immobilized by the magnetic field gradient
MA
superimposed there and be concentrated about the cancer tumor. Some DOX would be released because of the low pH of the environment but even more DOX would be released as these As a
TE
D
particles reach the lower pH regions inside the endosome/lysosome compartment. consequence, more cell death would occur.
AC CE P
3.3 In Vitro Cell Assay
The investigation of the cytotoxicity of the Nan carrier materials is the most important task since the entire purpose of the drug is to kill the cancer cells. Figure 7 shows the cell viabilities of
HeLa
cells
incubated
with
different
amounts
of
DOX
and
DOX-
PLGA@
[email protected] for 24 hrs as determined by MTT assay. All the cell viabilities decrease with the increase in the concentration, demonstrating the dose-dependent cytotoxicity of the DOX by itself and as part of the drug carrier, PLGA@
[email protected] . With its small molecular structure, DOX can diffuse into the cells more rapidly, which induces a clear cytotoxicity
of
free
DOX
at
low
concentration.
The
cytotoxicity
of
DOX-
PLGA@
[email protected] is due to the DOX released particles after its endocentric uptake by the cancer cells. At higher concentration (250 μgmL–1), the uptake of these nanocomposites
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15
by the HeLa cells by means of endocytosis, followed by the acid-enhanced release of the DOX inside the endosomes, improves the effect of the drug on the cancer cells and causes the similar
PT
cytotoxicity (3.31% ) to that of free DOX.
RI
Conclusion
In this study, we have synthesized and investigated the possible therapeutic efficiency of
SC
DOX-PLGA@
[email protected] nanoparticles. The nanoparticles clearly showed a magnetic The releasing
NU
core coated with polymer shell and have a good magnetic responsiveness.
efficiencies of DOX by the nanocarriers were found to depend on the pH (pH-responsive). As
MA
seen for the case of physiological pH=7.4, the drug release rate is relatively slow. When the pH of the buffer solutions is 4.0, the release is much faster and more complete. In vitro biological
D
activity shows that the DOX-loaded synthesized nanoparticles exhibit the dose-dependent
TE
cytotoxicity. At concentrations less than 125μgmL-1, the DOX-PLGA@
[email protected]
AC CE P
particles showed lower toxicity against HeLa cells in comparison to that when only DOX was used. At higher concentration of 250μgmL–1, the DOX- PLGA@
[email protected] showed clearer anti-cancer activity to HeLa cells than that seen when using free DOX. On the basis of the above investigation, i.e. pH-responsive controlled release and biological activity give the synthesized nanoparticles potential application in effective drug delivery system. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Thailand Research Fund (TRF)-Office of the Higher Education Commission-Kasetsart University (TRG5780269, to WP), the Departments of Physics and Materials science, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University (to WM,
NB,
(to WM).
WP
and
IMT),
and
the
National
Nanotechnology
Center,
Thailand.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16
References [1] M. Ferrari, Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges, Nat. Rev. Cancer. 5 (2005)
PT
161-171.
RI
[2] L. Zhang, F.X. Gu, J.M. Chan, A.Z. Wang, R.S. Langer, O.C. Farokhzad, Nanoparticles in
SC
medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 83 (2008) 761-769. [3] E. Kai-Hua Chow, D. Ho, Cancer nanomedicine: From Drug Delivery to Imaging. Sci.
NU
Transl. Med. 5(216) (2013) 216rv4.
MA
[4] T Sun, Y.S. Zhang, B. Pang, D.C. Hyun, M. Yang, Y. Xia, Engineered Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 12320-12364.
D
[5] J.H. Adair, M.P. Parette, E.I. Altınoğlu, M. Kester, Nanoparticulate Alternatives for Drug
TE
Delivery. ACS. Nano. 4(9) (2010) 4967-4970.
(2009) 16-20.
AC CE P
[6] O.C. Farokhzad, R. Langer, Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery. ACS. Nano. 3(1)
[7] K. Park, Facing the Truth about Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery. ACS. Nano. 7(9) (2013) 7442-7447.
[8] M. Sinn Aw, M. Kurian, D. Losic, Polymeric Micelles for Multidrug Delivery and Combination Therapy. Chem. Eur. J. 19 (2013) 12586-12601. [9] D.A. LaVan, T. McGuire, R. Langer, Small-scale systems for in vivo drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (2003) 1184-1191. [10] R. Misra, S. Acharya, S.K. Sahoo, Cancer nanotechnology: application of nanotechnology in cancer therapy. Drug. Discov. Today. 15(19/20) (2010) 842-849.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17
[11] X. Li, H. Li, G. Liu, Z. Deng, S. Wu, P. Li, X. Xu, H. Xu, P.K. Chu, Magnetite-loaded fluorine-containing polymeric micelles for magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery.
PT
Biomaterials. 33(10) (2012) 3013-3024.
RI
[12] S. Mura, J. Nicolas, P. Couvreur, Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 12 (2013) 991-1003.
SC
[13] T. Chen, M.I. Shukoor, R. Wang, Z. Zhao, Q. Yuan, S. Bamrungsap, X. Xiong, W. Tan,
NU
Smart Multifunctional Nanostructure for Targeted Cancer Chemotherapy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ACS. Nano. 5(10) (2011) 7866-7873.
MA
[14] J. Yu, X. Chu, Y.l. Hou, Stimuli-responsive cancer therapy based on nanoparticles, Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 11614-11630.
TE
D
[15] Q. Xi-Long, L. Qing-Lan, Y. Zhou, J. Xiao-Yu, Q. Ai-Di, Y. Ying-Wei, Sugar and pH dualresponsive snap-top nanocarriers based on mesoporous silica-coated Fe3O4 magnetic
AC CE P
nanoparticles for cargo delivery. Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 4237-4240. [16] J. Liu, Y. Huang, A. Kumar, A. Tan, S. Jin, A. Mozhi, L. Xing-Jie, pH-Sensitive nanosystems for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biotechnol. Adv. 32 (2014) 693-710. [17] C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, A. Concheiro, Smart drug delivery systems: from fundamentals to the clinic. Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 7743-7765. [18] Y. Wang , M.S. Shim , N.S. Levinson , S. Hsing-Wen, Y. Xia, Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Controlled Release of Theranostic Agents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (2014) 42064220. [19] L. Zhang, R. Guo, M. Yang, X. Jiang, B. Liu, Thermo and pH Dual-Responsive Nanoparticles for Anti-Cancer Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 19 (2007) 2988-2992.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18
[20] Y. Jia, M. Yuan, H. Yuan, X. Huang, X. Sui, X. Cui, F. Tang, J. Peng, J. Chen, S. Lu, W. Xu, L. Zhang, Q. Guo, Co-encapsulation of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and doxorubicin into
PT
biodegradable PLGA nanocarriers for intratumoral drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 7 (2012)
RI
1697-1708.
[21] S.D. Kong, W. Zhang, J.H. Lee, K. Brammer, R. Lal, M. Karin, S. Jin, Magnetically
SC
Vectored Nanocapsules for Tumor Penetration and Remotely Switchable On-Demand Drug
NU
Release. Nano Lett. 10 (2010) 5088-5092.
[22] I.F. Tannock, D. Rotin, Acid pH in Tumors and Its Potential for Therapeutic Exploitation.
MA
Cancer. Res. 49 (1989) 4373-4384.
[23] N. Ahmed, H. Fessi, A. Elaissari, Theranostic applications of nanoparticles in cancer. Drug.
TE
D
Discov. Today. 17(17/18) (2012) 928-934.
[24] J. Gao, H. Gu, B. Xu, Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design, Synthesis, and
AC CE P
Biomedical Applications. Accounts. Chem. Res. 42(8) (2009) 1097-1107. [25] X. Li, D. Zhao, F. Zhang, Multifunctional Upconversion-Magnetic Hybrid Nanostructured Materials: Synthesis and Bioapplications. Theranostics. 3(5) (2013) 292-305. [26] W. Sumit Arora, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers, Int. J. Nanomedicine. 7 (2012) 3445-3471. [27] R. Hao, R. Xing, Z. Xu, Y. Hou, S. Gao, S. Sun, Synthesis, Functionalization, and Biomedical Applications of Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) 2729-2742. [28] C. Xu, S. Sun, New forms of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 65 (2013) 732-743.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19
[29] Z. Beji, A. Hanini, L.S. Smiri, J. Gavard, K. Kacem, F. Villain, J.-M. Grenèche, F. Chau, S. Ammar, Magnetic properties of Zn-substituted MnFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized in polyol as
PT
potential heating agents for hyperthermia. Evaluation of their toxicity on Endothelial cells.
RI
Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) 5420-5429.
[30] J. Li, Y. Qu, J. Ren, W. Yuan, D. Shi, Magnetocaloric effect in magnetothermally-
SC
responsive nanocarriers for hyperthermia-triggered drug release. Nanotechnology. 23(50) (2012)
NU
505706
[31] K.A. Janes, M.P. Fresneau, A. Marazuela, A. Fabra, M.J. Alonso, Chitosan nanoparticles as
MA
delivery systems for doxorubicin. J. Control. Rel. 73 (2001) 255-267. [32] A. Grenha, Chitosan nanoparticles: a survey of preparation methods. J. Drug.Target. 20
TE
D
(2012) 291-300.
[33] M.L. Tan, P.F.M. Choong, C.R. Dass, Review: doxorubicin delivery systems based on
AC CE P
chitosan for cancer therapy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 61 (2009) 131-142. [34] M. Prabaharan, Chitosan-based nanoparticles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 72 (2015) 1313-1322.
[35] A. Javid, S. Ahmadian, A.A. Saboury, S.M. Kalantar, S. Rezaei-Zarchi, Chitosan-Coated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Doxorubicin Delivery: Synthesis and Anticancer Effect Against Human Ovarian Cancer Cells. Chem. Biol. Drug. Des. 82 (2013) 296306. [36] G. Unsoy, R. Khodadust, S. Yalcin, P. Mutlu, U. Gunduz, Synthesis of Doxorubicin loaded magnetic chitosan nanoparticles for pH responsive targeted drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 62 (2014) 243-250.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20
[37] Z. Deng, Z. Zhen, X. Hu, Z. Xu, P.K. Chu, Hollow chitosan-silica nanospheres as pHsensitive targeted delivery carriers in breast cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 32(21) (2011) 4976-
PT
4986.
RI
[38] X. Hu, Y. Wang, B. Peng, Chitosan-Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as pHResponsive Nanocarriers for Controlled Drug Release. Chem. Asian. J. 9(1) (2014) 319-327.
SC
[39] L. Chronopouloua, M. Massimib, M.F. Giardib, C. Camettic, L.C. Devirgiliis, M. Dentinia,
NU
C. Palocci, Chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles: A sustained drug release strategy for cell Cultures, Colloids. Surf. B. 103 (2013) 310-317.
MA
[40] Y. Wang, P. Li, L. Kong, Chitosan-Modified PLGA Nanoparticles with Versatile Surface for Improved Drug Delivery. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 14(2) (2013) 585-592.
TE
D
[41] M. Guo, R. Wen-Ting, J. Hou, W. Dong-Fang, Y. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Shu-Qin, Q. Xu, Mechanisms of chitosan-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles for improving oral
AC CE P
absorption of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin. Nanotechnology. 24 (2013) 245101. [42] Jian-Ming Lü, Xinwen Wang, Christian Marin-Muller, Hao Wang, Peter H Lin, Qizhi Yao, and Changyi Chen, Current advances in research and clinical applications of PLGA-based nanotechnology. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 9 (2009) 325-341. [43] H.S. Yoo, K.H. Lee, J.E. Oh, T.G. Park, In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activities of nanoparticles based on doxorubicin-PLGA conjugates. J. Control. Rel. 68 (2000) 419-431. [44] Z. Wang, C. Wai-Keung, P.C. Ho, Design of a Multifunctional PLGA Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery System: Evaluation of its Physicochemical Properties and Anticancer Activity to Malignant Cancer Cells. Pharmacol. Res. 26(5) (2009) 1162-1171. [45] B. Sivakumar, R.G. Aswathy, Y. Nagaoka, S. Iwai, T. Hasumura, K. Venugopal, K. Kato, Y. Yoshida, T. Maekawa, D.N. Sakthikumar, Augmented cellular uptake and anti-proliferation
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 21
against pancreatic cancer cells induced by targeted curcumin and SPION encapsulated PLGA nanoformulation. Mater. Express. 4(3) (2014) 183-195.
PT
[46] V. Sanna, A.M. Roggio, N. Pala, S. Marceddu, G. Lubinu, A. Mariani, M. Sechi, Effect of
RI
chitosan concentration on PLGA microcapsules for controlled release and stability of resveratrol. Inter. J. Biol. Macro. 72 (2015) 531-536.
SC
[47] N.A. Peppas, C. Paolo, Analysis of drug release behavior from swellable polymer carriers
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
using the dimensionality index. J. Control. Release. 45 (1997) 35.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
22
Figure 1.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
23
Figure 2.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
24
Figure 3.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
26
Figure 4.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
27
Figure 5.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
28
Figure 6.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
29
Figure 7.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 30 Figure Captions
PT
Figure 1. XRD patterns of patterns of as-prepared magnetic Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles.
RI
Figure 2. TEM images of Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 (a) and (b) PLGA@
[email protected], respectively.
SC
Figure 3. Magnetization curves of the Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. Magnetization curves of the as-synthesized Mn0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 and PLGA@
[email protected]
NU
MNPs. Photograph of PLGA@
[email protected] attracted by an external magnet (inset).
MA
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of PLGA@
[email protected] (a) and DOX- PLGA@
[email protected] (b).
TE
analysis to fit Peppas’s model [43].
D
Figure 6. Drug release of DOX from PLGA@
[email protected] at pH 7.4 and 4.0 and a regression
Figure 7. Cell viability of HeLa cells with different amounts of DOX and DOX- PLGA@
[email protected]
AC CE P
for 24 hrs determined by MTT assay.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 31
Graphical Abstract
PT
Synthesis of doxorubicin-PLGA loading on chitosan stabilized
RI
(Mn,Zn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles: Biological activity and pH-responsive
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
drug release studies
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 32
PT
Research highlights
Synthesis of PLGA-coated chitosan stabilized (Mn,Zn) MCPs as an effective carriers.
•
The synthesized nanocarriers were found that the releasing efficiencies of DOX depend on pH
SC
RI
•
In vitro biological activity revealed that the DOX-loaded synthesized nanoparticles
TE
D
MA
demonstrating the dose-dependent cytotoxicity.
AC CE P
•
NU
(pH-responsive).