Tetmhedrm VoL 48. No. 28, pi. 58825900,1992
oo4o420192
RiinGnslBW
h8U”O” hZsS Ltd
SYNTHESIS
OF FURO-FURANS
Angela
M.Celli,
Istituto
di
BY REARRANGEMENT
Mirella
Chimica
Scotton*,
Organica,
53100
- Siena
OF 4-ACETYLPYRANS
Alessandro
Piano
$5.00+.00
dei
Sega
Mantellini,
44
(Italy)
(Receivedin UK 18 May 1992)
Key
words:
Abstract
furo-furans,
- The
c bearing
hetero-Diels-Alder
4c
and
6c.
Cycloadducts
3a,
3c
and
7a was
with
7c
4c'easily
vinyl
ether
and
8c. by
of
the
aspects
The
single
of
to
6c
to
stereochemistry crystal
other the
and
5a-c
and
furo[2,3-blfurans
difuro[2,3-b:3',4'of
X-ray
compounds
reaction
and
5,6-dihydro-4H-pyrans
rearranged 5a
la-
l-oxabutadienes
ethyl
functionalized
cycloadducts
determined
Some
the
2a and and
configurations data.
groups
of
noes.
4H-4aB5,6,6a;Sz!etrahydrofuro[2,3-blpyrans
9c
7a,
dlfurans
gave
hetero-Diels-Alder,
reaction
electron-withdrawing
2,3-dihydrofuran 2a-c,
furo-pyrans,
compounds
analysis.
were
5c
established
mechanisms
are
and
Relative by
nOe
discussed.
Introduction
The bony1 the
hetero
Diels-Alder
compounds synthesis In
earlier
2,5-dione,
and of
la
electron-rich
dihydropyran
work and
reaction
by ethyl
one
of
substituted
dienophiles
is
a,R-unsaturated an
attractive
carroute
to
derivatives. of
vinyl
us1 ether
it
was
gave
5883
found the
that
expected
3,4-diacetyl-3-hexencycloadduct
2a
with
5884
A. M. CELLIet al.
a 4-acetylpyran ibly the
to
the
furo[2,3-blfuran
reaction We
yield
was
therefore
tent
of
with
one
this
desired
or
This
structure.
The
3a.
practically
undertook
a
was
labile,
isomerising
rearrangement
was
irrevers-
stereospecific
and
quantitative.
study
in
rearrangement
more
compound
to
gain
some
understanding
$-SCylpyrahS.
other
electron-withdrawing
groups
We
such
as
of
used
la-c 2-4
the
ex-
heterodienes to
obtain
the
4-acylpyrans.
Results
The
reaction
of
2,3-dihydrofuran which
were
acetyl
and
well-known 'H-NMR
gave
4b
ethoxy
one
(coupling
more
easily
of
with in
The
and
vinyl
case,
the
on
4b
and
5b were
not
than
the
former.
This
or
with
structures between
the
reactions5"
nOe
ether
configuration
attributed
Diels-Alder
constants
ethyl
each
trans
tentatively
was
endo-selectivity
lb
cycloadduct
respectively.
groups
cycloadducts
latter
only
5b
and
spectra
The
Z-3-hexen-2,5-dione
basis
and
of the
of
the
confirmed
by
experiments). very
stable
made
their
and
the
decomposed,
purification
diffi-
cult. The 3 and
introduction 4
of
but
also
la
reacted
tive by
the
made
yield.
acidity.
two
heterodiene the
with This On
of
other not
cycloadducts
the
basis
gave of
to rise
spectral
18 R= R’=R”=Ac lbR=R’=H,
only
increased
obtained
2,3-dihydrofuran compound
electron-withdrawing
R”=Ac
lc R= R”= COOEt , R’=Ac
more
give to
rate
stable. cycloadduct
the
rearranged
in
positions
cycloaddition
of
Thus
a rearrangement
data
2al-c
the
the
groups
the 5a
which
in
tetraketone a quantita-
was
product
4b,c
catalyzed was
at-
Synthesis of fin-furans
5885
fOOEt
EtOOC\
tributed
structure
the
of
3,3a-diacetyl-2,7a-dimethyl-3b,4,5,6a-tetra-
hJ-drodifuro[2,3-b:3',4'-dlfuran. the
configuration X-ray
ranged
made
of
analysis
compound
had
The
substitution
the
cycloaddition
reaction
trend
endioic which
two
On
was
undertaken cis-syn-cis
by
X-ray
data
out
of
and
basis
of
than
in
Thus
analysis,
eight
was
that
two of
ester
compound of
la,
for The
and
8c
exo in
cis-syn-cis The
compound adduct the
a mixture
6c
ratio
lc
even
of but
data
the
stable
cycloadduct
established
if
products
stable
other
groups the
6c.
This
diethyl
the
from
other
slowly was
attribution
tenwas
4a-acetyl-2-methylas
the
struc-
5c.
configuration
alkene
rear-
E-2,3-diacetyl-3-but-
1H-4aB,j,6,7aR-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]pyran-3,4-dicarboxylate t.ure
the
ethoxycarbonyl
was
the
establish
possibilities.
One
and
which
to
7a.
case
gave
sufficient
established
by
diethyl
spectral 5c
the
it
the
isolated.
structure
not
groups
2,3-dihydrofuran were
was
configuration
acetyl
analogous.
attributed
confirmed
two
slower
with
the
compound
the
cycloadducts
rearranged. tativelh
lc
this
of
was
acid
The
also
rearranged 60:40. for reacted
easily
Spectral 7c
and with
to data,
give
chiefly
cis-syn-trans ethyl
a mixture
vinyl
nOe for
ether
of
compounds
data,
compound to
yield
7c
confirmed 8c. a
mixture
A. M. Wetal.
of three
compounds
in the
as the cycloadduct
ratio
4c. The
83:13:4.
other
two
The
had
main
the
product
was
identified
furo[2,3-blfuran
structures
3c and 9c respectively.
MO
R
Discussion
NMR and X-ray The group
NMR
is
constant
in
Data spectrum axial
values
coupling
spect
to the ethoxy
the
lished.
relative
in
The
group
4b fact
trans
clearly the
support
on saturation
ethoxy
group
for this
of
the from
C6 chiral
interpretation
3J~5g,H~
and
ethoxy
cowling
of the H6 axial-H5
acetyl the
the
group
reaction
centers
is offered
can
with
re-
mechanism be estab-
by nOe experi-
on both methylene
hydrogens
of the
(2.3 % and 3.7 %) and no nOe on H6. However
we cannot
choose
conformation
of H3 we have noes
that
the presence
be deduced
of C4 and
indicates
35 H5,H6
position
can then
configuration
ments:
between
position:
pathway.
Further
compound
(2.48 and 4.60 Hz) exclude
axial
and
of
A and B:
6Et
A
B
5887
Synthesis of furo-furans
The
relative and
nism,
configuration
also
and
4 we
is
possible
fairly
have
noes to
well
on
(3.4
distance
pendent
of
between
tion
we
111
the
4a
conformation
Dreiding
be on
results:
and
2.1
%
nOe
analysis
deduced
from
irradiation
of
respectively);
terms
and
7a
or
D)
of
compound
= 2.5
r4,4a
the
in
protons
this
and.equation
are
mecha7a
case
it
can
be
[l]
negligible':
111
(C
models
obtain
may
6 r 4a,4 6 r 4a,7a
=
sponding
%
5b
cross-saturation
f4a(4)
The
nOe
quantitative
that
f4a(7a)
compound
from
4a
exploit
provided
written,
of
protons
(r4a,7a)
can
and, 5b:
be
is
a
estimated =
r4a,7a
2.30
constant from
A.
inde-
the
corre-
Applying
equa-
1.
c If to
the
and
4a
3.1
1
the
7a
protons for
cis
and is
thus
we
f4(3) PC-= f4(7a)
Introducing
r3,4 model,
cis
in
2.5
can
the
then
(from
trans
this
the
NOe
distance
Dreiding
are
noes
on
position
is
model
reveals the
4
with
satisfied
that
As on
proton
only
= 2.45
r4,4a
respectively).
analysis
a
A
and
and
if
the
4
r4,4a
=
consequence
irradiation
(12.5%
respect
1.05%
of
the the
3
respec-
write:
12.5
r6
1.05
r63,4
=
pseudo-equatorial
configuration
A".
there
protons,
is
ring,
are
r3,4
tively),
Dreiding
ring
dihydropyran
distance and
furan
2.50
however,
r4 Ls
4,7a
1, this
7a
r3,4
we
obtain
distance
r4,7a should
[21
1.51 -
= be
3.8 4.2
A. 1.
According
to
the
A. M. CELLIef al.
5888
Now,
if the
hydropyran either then
furan
ring,
axial
or equatorial
to the Dreiding as
= 3.3 A).
trans
to the acetyl The
methyl
and H-6a
fore
solved
shown
ORTEP
X-ray
ORTEP
of
on H6a
= 3.8 ff (whereas is axial, to
probably
then the
di-
H4
in
according = 2.9 A
r3,4
Dreiding
in axial
be taken
settled
of a cis
as conclusive. The
Bond
(Fig.1).
be
on saturation
in favor
diffraction.
plot
7a cannot
(3.4%),
evidence
cannot
configuration
plot
are listed The
of
the
structure
(Me group
from
model
position
and
so
distances
and
coupling
of the quaternary
relationship
The
structure
using
problem
between
was
determined angles
there-
is
are
7a
as
listed
in
on both
is shown
data
analysis.
to 7a carbon)
nOe on 3b (0.088)
5c was
of the compounds
3b and
in the case
compound
determined
by
Bond
in Fig.2.
X-ray
study.
distances
and
The
angles
3 and 4, respectively.
nOe
bonded
of
molecule
in Tables
be deduced
As
the
the
that H4 is equatorial,
(according
is very
to
with
1 and 2, respectively.
The
noes
offers
but
by
in the
Tables
problem
The nOe obtained
hydrogens,
Me-78
ring
If H4 i
respect
group.
configurational
constants.
[2] r4,7a
= 4.4
furan
with
bl is satisfied
Let us suppose
= 4.0 1).
r4,7a
So the
position
= 2.5
equation
r4,7a
a consequence,
in axial r4,4a
position.
from
model
r4,7a
is
distance
= 2.5 i% and
r3,4
and,
ring
the
6a protons
5b,
from
6c by
irradiation
of the more
of
abundant
on
(0.013),
and on irradiation
of compound
derived On
rearrangement the
it is possible
was
of
a nOe
to apply
can
protons
we obtained
compound
irradiation
of 3b there
methyl
6a there on 6a
was
a
(0.143).
quantitative
ana-
lysis:
f6a(3b)
=
p-efg,(Me)
r 6 Ga,Me
fgb(6a)
I31
6
fgb(Me)
r 6a,3b
From if
these
r3b,6a
distance
equations
it is possible
is
Let
known.
is 2.35 A and
from the equations
r 6 3b,Me 6 r 3b,Ga
=
us
suppose
to extract that
it is independent
[3] and
[4] we have
6a of
r3b,Re
r~~,he and
3b
(4 1
and r6a,Re are
syn or anti
cis:
distances then
structures.
= 3.2 1 and r6a,Me
their Thus
= 3.5 A.
Synthesis of tie-furans
However,
from
the Dreiding
= 3.3-3.5
r3b,Me
structures
the
express
ton).
If 3b and
[3).and
(41,
matched
by
tributed
(Me
6a are
r3b,Me trans
the less
group
bonded
irradiation
of
bonded
abundant to
3b
to
equation
=
independent
trans then
on
the
On
NMR
syn
(the
methyl
pro-
from
equations
distances
7c can
be
are
not
safely
at-
1.5%
for the minor
the compounds
a
6a
and
nOe
on
(0.042)
on
of the methyl
protons
3b
proton
(0.026),
and
methyl
protons
irradiation
of
6a there
on (Me
is
a
write:
E51
of r3b,Me
on
be
compound was
Their
distance
is 3.1
equation
[5] we
by configuration
6a are with
of
lc and
obtained
relative
the protons
cis
r3b,6a
any
structure.
of
vinyl ratio
configuration
the methyls
the methylenes
derivatives
ethyl
in the
have
cis-syn-
= 2.35 A and Thus
the
and
minor
9c, the ethoxy
group
may
assume
a mix-
3:l as deestablished
in position
respectively).
major
ether, ca.
was
of ethoxy
to the
attributed
Let us
to the compound.
products
and major
3c and
If 3b and
is known.
their
from
only
is not compatible
the protons
then
Thus,
is satisfied
between
of
if r3b,6a
are trans,
structure.
= 3.4 A.
integration.
saturation
then
on
(0.031)
distance
reaction
obtained
tion.
structure
have
noes
or anti
r3b,Me
were
9c could
we
the calculation
two rearranged
from
nOe.
are
8c can be attributed
From
by
carbon)
= 2.45 A which
r3b,Me
duced
These
on irradiation
the 3b and 6a protons
for which
of
the closest
f
r63b,Me
3.2 A. This
q
structure
ture
4.3-4.5
is 3.1 1 and,
= 4.6 A.
the
range
for the other
r63b,6a
allows
that
suppose
7a
there
fgb(6a)
r3b,Me
Thus
We can therefore
f3b(Me)
A
distance
r6a,Me
compound,
7a carbon)
nOe on 3b (0.033).
This
structure.
the
= 3.5 A and
rGa,Me
(7c), while
3b or 6a and
their
A and
in
are
to the compound.
For
group
values
between
trans,
= 4.3
distances
structure
have
distances
the distances
any
these
i for the cis-syn-cis same
values
model,
5889
groups
6a, noes (11%
Structures
derivatives, a pseudo-axial
and
3c and In both posi-
A. M. CELLIet al.
Mechanistic
aspects
The
formation
explained
by
the
ring
pyran
or
5c
and
of
the
rearranged
nucleophilic in
attack
attack 2a
compound by
the
of
or
pyran
products
3a,
4-acetyl
group
a
2c,
or
oxygen
on
on
the
the
If
both
this
the
Since that
only
the
carbon The
a
syn
would
of
obtain
the 2a
crystal
of
similar
ethyl From
vinyl the
endo-adduct
of
two
or
the
furan
quite
carbon
of we
conclusion
7a
can
ring
7a as
as
can
6 position system
shown
be of 5a
below:
can
5a
partecipated
in
in
we
a suitable
have
to
position
conclude to
attack
5a.
determined that out
by
X-ray
only
the
reached
be
and
products.
is
of
deduce
carried
2a
stereospecific
groups
carbon
structure
cycloadduct
rearranged
is
acetyl
the
so
the
two
rearrangement
6 of
side A
the
the
groups
configuration,
other
and
we
one
the
7c
5a.c
acetyl
attack,
on
and
furo[2,3-blpyran
acyl
2 a,c
7a,
3c,
the
analysis
acetyl
re\,ealed
group
on
the
between
la
rearrangement.
for
the
cycloadduct
etherl. reaction 5c
and
between the
exe
lc
and
adduct.
2,3-dihydrofuran 6c.
The
former
we
isolated
showed
the
both aoetyl
5891
Synthesis of furo-furans
group
cis
to the
exo-adduct
6c slowly
7c and
8c. The
rearrangement
In this
ity. It
can
be
attacks the
case
cis
carbonyl
oxygen
the
In
la.
were
can
of
the
spectrum
fact
isolated
of
the
derived two
raw
from
rearranged
and their
slower of
rise
to the
the
by
rearranged
traces
in the
pyran
the
of
of
intermediate
7a
on
of acid-
former
ring
both
rear-
cases.
6c
first
9c.
Then,
sides
of
the
ether
the
7c and 8c. lc
and
was so high
material.
The
less
ethyl
that
vinyl
it was not even
rearrangement
stereospecific
compounds,
formation
than
carbonium
between
lc are
give
to a mixture
giving
compounds
reaction
not
accelerated
atom
at C-4
attack
the
was
oxygen
group
did rise
was
rate of the exo-adduct
the cycloadducts of
the
ring to give
case
rearrangement NMR
that
and
gave
rearrangement
carbonyl
tetrahydrofuran
in the
the
supposed
the
In
ring
The
rangeeent. products
tetrahydrofuran
3c and
9c,
can be explained
seen
reactions
than
in the
of
in the case ratio
75:25,
as for compounds
7c and
8c. The
cycloaddition
dihydrofuran withdrawing fully
was
tion
lb with
slower,
expected,
much
groups.
as
in contrast
Moreover,
stereospecific, Compounds
of compound
giving
hydrogen
atom
in position
pathways
to yield
but, 4, the
a mixture
ether
lb
has
or with
less
the behavior
2,3-
electron-
of lc,
it was
only.
the acetyl
possibly
vinyl
since
with
one cycloadduct
4b and 5b seem to have
for the rearrangement,
ethyl
due
group
in a suitable
to the presence
cycloadducts
prefer
to
posi-
of a mobile
follow
different
of products.
Experimental
Unless 782
otherwise
stated,
spectrophotometer
spectra strument shifts
were
recorded
(60 MHz) (J in Hz)
Proton-Proton
samples
are
pulse
reported
were
were
XL-200
with
with
from gated
on
bromide
a Perkin-Elmer pellets;
'II NMR
a Hitachi-Perkin-Elmer
FT spectrometer
downfield
measured
recorded
in potassium
solutions
for CDC13
or a Varian
noes
nOe difference Silica
using
IR spectra
(200 MHz);
internal
in-
chemical
tetramethylsilane.
decoupling
techniques
using
sequences.
gel plates
(Merck
F2.54) and
silica
gel
60
(Merck
70-230
mesh)
5892
A.M.Ceuretal.
were
used
for analytical
phy,
respectively.
were
evaporated Starting
cited:
la2,
General
Extracts
over
and
for
sodium
column
sulphate
chromatograand
solvents
were
prepared
by
the
literature
procedures
lb3 and lc4.
Procedure
for Cycloadditions
la-c
up (see Table
were
When
the excess
heated
the
reagent
with
starting
an
excess
material
was removed
had
under
of
ethyl
vinyl
disappeared
vacuum
ether
or
(TLC
or NMR
and the residue
worked
5).
5 - Cycloaddition
Heterodiene
dried
TLC
in vacua.
2,3_dihydrofuran.
Table
preparative were
heterodienes
Compounds
check),
and
Ether
Reactions
"C
Time
(h)
Products
% Yield
x,ya
la
X
36
28
la
Y
55
6
lb
X
60
lb
Y
lc lc
a x = Ethyl
Compound The 5a
and
revealed
2a
89
5a t 7a
54:36
50
2b
80
85
29
5b
90
X
60
40
2c t
Y
55
8
vinyl
3c t 9c
83:13:4 32:49:6:4
5c t 6c t '7c t 8c
y = 2,3-dihydrofuran.
ether;
la and 2,3-Dihydrofuran NMR 7a.
spectrum
of the
Preparative
TLC
5a as the faster
residue with
running
showed
the
presence
ether/petroleum
of
ether
3:l
band and la as the slower
Z-Methyl-3,4,4-triacetyl-dH-4aa,5,6,7aa-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]furan, oil;
IR
(neat)
1730,
4.4-3.8(m,2H,H6,H6'),
1710,
162O(vs)
2.7-3.l(m,lH,H4a),
cm-';
NMR
6:
two as
products eluent
band. 5a:
5.56(d,lH,J=4.8,Hia),
2.17(s,3H,Me),
2.29(s,6H,2xMe),
5893
Synthesisoffuro-furans
2.12(s,3H,Me),
1.7-lB9(m,2H,H5,H5')
H 6.77;
C 63.05,
found:
ppm. Anal.calcd
for Cl4Hl805:
C 63.16,
H 6.71.
3,3aa-Diacetpl-2,7aa-dimethyl-3ba,4,5,6aa-tetrahydrodifurof2,3-b:3',4'-dl 7a:
furan,
NMR
6:
mp
145-148°C
(cyclohexane);
5.95(d,lH,J=6.4,H6a), 2,34(s,3H,MeCO),
H5'), lH,H4)
1.45
63.16., H 6.77;
Compound
lb
The
ether
found:
and
residue
1:l.
The
vinyl
was
band was a mixture
3.79(m,lH,H3b),
ppm.
1710,
lH,J=3.05,H3),
by preparative band
was
of E and Z starting
NMR
the
TLC
1.04(t,3H,J=7.08,Me)
Compound
The
lb
and
for
with
Cl4Hl805:
residue
2b and
H3),
oil;
2b: and
4.60,
IR
(neat):
H6),
4.51(brd,
3.34-3.49(m,lH,CH2-O),
1.68-le79(m,2H,H5,H5'),
was
sublimed
1670
cm-';
NMR
and
at
room
1.59(brd,3H,J=l.g5,Me-2),
temperature
Compound
and
with
residue
1:2. The the
Diethyl
ethyl
was
faster
stereoisomer
6:
and
0.05mm.Hg
to
give
vinyl
IR
4.43(brd,lH,J=5.4,
3,02(brd,lH,J=5,7,H4),
1.7-1.92(m,2H,H5tH5'),
2.45-2.57
1.62(s,3H,Me-2)
ppm.
ether
purified running 9c.
oil;
56:
5.25(d,lH,J=4.1,H7a),
16.9,H6tH6'),
2.07(s,3H,MeCO),
ether
3.06-3.13(m,
5b.
(m,lH,H4a),
The
slower
ppm.
3.79(dd,ZH,J=8.0
lc
the
alkene.
4a-rlcetyl-Z-methyl-4H-4aa,5,6,7aa-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]pyran,
1705,
C
2,3-dihydrofuran
the cycloadduct
(neat):
(m,
ether/petroleum
cycloadduct
6: 4.84(dd,lH,J=2.48
3.60-3.75(m,lH,CH2-O),
lli,H4), 2.01(s,3H,MeCO),
3.54(m,lH,
ether
running
1690 cm-';
cm-l;
1.75-1.95
Anal.calcd
4a-AcetJ71-4H-5,6-dihydro-6R-ethoxy-2-methylpyran,
1720,
16OO(vs)
H 6.88.
purified
faster
1680,
2.11(s,3H,Me-2),
1.42(s,3H,Me-5)
C 63.42,
ethyl
1700,
3.87(m,lH,H5),
2,36(s,3H,MeCO),
(m,lH,H4'),
:
IR
by preparative band
The
slower
was
the
band
TLC
rearranged was
the
with
ether/petroleum
compound
cycloadduct
3c
together
2c.
2,6aa-dimethyl-5R-ethoxy-3a,4,5,6a-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-bJfuro-3,
3an-dicarboxylate,
3c:
oil;
IR (neat):
1730,
1720,
1680,
1610 cm-';
NMR 6:
A. M. CELUet al.
5.17(dd,lH,J=4.2 (m,lH,0CH2
acetal),
14.1, H4), MeGa),
and 7.6, H5),
2.44
(dd,lH,J=4.2
Jaa-dicarboxylate, esters),
(m,SH,JxMe
9c,
oil
1720,
oil,
(purified 1690,
Compound
5.27(d,lH,J=5.3,H5), acetal),
sublimation NMR
6:
2.27(s,3H,Me-2),
1.23(t,6H,J=7.8,2xMe
eluent
was
and
solved
gave,
(s,3H,
4.05-4.25(m,4H,
3.41-3.48(m,lH,0CH2
acetal),
1.47(s,3H,Me-6a),1,05-1.30
at
5O'C,
0.02
4.88(dd,lH,J=2.4
mmHg), and
IR
2.20(dd,lH,J=7.0 esters),
(neat):
7.O,H6),
3.49-3.64(m,lH,0CH2),
4.08-
2.51(dd,lH,
and 13.3, H5'),
l.l9(t,3H,J=7,3,Me
by preparative
in
order
of
TLC with
mobility,
2.19
acetal).
7c was
purified
repeated
preparative
TLC
from
traces
ether/petroleum
the
7c and 8c, and the cycloadduct
products
of the
in the same mixture
ether
cycloadduct
6c,
the
5c. diastereoisomer
anti
8c
of solvents.
4a-acetyl-Z-methyl-4H-4aa,5,6,7aa-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]furan-3,4R-
dicarboxylate,
6c:
oil;
(m,lH,HS'),
IR
(neat):
2.36(s,3H,Me-2),
1720,
2.11(s,3H,MeCO),
1.21(t,3H,J=7.6,Me
for C16H2207:
1735,
1680,
4.14(q,2H,J=7.6,CH2-ester),
5.87(d,lH,J=5.3,H7a), CH2 ester),
C 58.89;
ester), H 6.75;
1610
cm-';
1.78-2.0(m,lH,
1.14(t,3H,J=7.6,Me
found:
'H NMR
3.65-4.09(m,6H,
C 58.44;
H5),
6
H4atH6+ 1.5-
ester).
1.7
Anal.
H 6.76.
2,7aa-dimethyl-3a,3ba,4,5,6aa,7a-hexahydrodifuro[2,3-~~:3',~'-dl
Diethyl
furan-3,3aa_dicarboxylate, 6:
(s,3H,Me-2),
3H,J=7.2,
7c: oil;
5.64(d,lH,J=3.8,H6a),
1.60
Me ester)
TR (neat):
4.1-4.3(m,
3.16(dt,lH,J=3.8
8.5 and 16.2,H5'), 2.24
1.52
ppm.
2.20(s,3H,Me-2),
cm-',
Compound
1 ; NMR
6:
3.79-3.95(m,lH,0CH2),
residue
rearranged
calcd
(s,3H,Me-2),
and
lc and 2,3_dihydrofuran
The
Diethyl
NMR
by
1620
and 13.3,H5),
(s,3H,Me-CO),
with
2.79(dd,lH,J=7.5
t acetal).
4.26(m,4H,2xCH2),
as
t acetal)
2.26
3.76-3.92
4a-Acetyl-4H-5,6-dihydro-6a-ethoxy-Z-methylpyran-3,4-dicarboxyl-
2c,
J=2.4
esters
and 14.1,H4),
esters
Diethyl
1:3
and 14.1, H4'),
3.61-3.78(m,lH,OCH2
3.01(dd,lH,J=5.3
1740,
acetal),
ester),
2,6aa-dimethyl-5a-ethoxy-3a,4,5,6a-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-b]furo-3,
Diethyl
ate,
3.52-3.66(m,lH,0CH2
1.05-1.30(m,9H,3xMe,
2xCH2
4.05-4.26(mS4H,2xCH2,CH2
(s,3H,Me-7a),
ppm. Anal.calcd
1730,
5H, 2xCH2tH5),
and 9.2,H3b), 1.23
1715,
Me ester),
C 58.89;
1600
I.Ol(dd,lH,J
2.15-2.24(m,2H,
(t,3H,J=7.2,
for C16H2207:
1680,
cm-
=
H4+H-I'), 1.22
H 6.75;
(t,
found:
Synthesis of furo-fimns
C 58.57;
H 6.79,
Diethyl
2,7aa-dimethyl-3a,3ba,4,5,6aR,7a-hexahydrodifuroC2,3-b:3',4'-d]
furan-3,3aa_dicarboxylate, cm -1;
NMR
6:
(m,lH,H3b), 1.3(m,6H, Diethyl
8c: oil;
5.98(d;lH,J=5.2,H6a),
5c:
and
mp
65-68°C
16.9,H6),
(cyclohexane);
or
Me-4),
1.19(t,3H,J=5.9,Me
found:
X-Ray
Structure
Single
C 58.52;
1610
3.45-3.65
1.43(s,3H,Me-7a),
1.15-
were
Cell
reflections.
The weighting
temperature
standard
Compound
and
9.5,H4a),
Anal.calcd
examined
deposited
were
1690,
1625
3.96(dd,
2.34(s,3H,Me-2
or
1.25(t,3H,J=5.9,
for Cl6H2207:
with
was
from O=
C 58.89;
H
and
X-ray angle
where
difof 25
o(Fo)
is
from the diffractom-
and
equivalent
parameters
isotropic
the Cambridge
setting
reflection
temperature and
the
crystalliza-
CAD4
[o~(Fo)J-~,
parameters
observed
by slow
an Enraf-Nonius
for each
parameters of
with
used
Positional
a list
7a, obtained
determined
deviation
anisotropic
positional and
5c and
scheme
statistics.
atoms,
been
ester).
parameters
factors,
atoms,
hydrogen
1720,
1.69-1.85(m,2H,H5tH5'),
of compounds
fractometer.
counting
1740,
Analysis
crystals
the individual
IR
H 6.69.
from cyclohexane,
isotropic
of carbon
temperature
calculated
and oxy-
parameters
structure
Crystallographic
of
factors
Data Centre.
7a mw 266.29
C14H1805 Monoclinic, 2622(6)
1665,
3.9-4.3(m,5H,H5+2xCH2-estei-s),
2.80(dt,lH,J=3.7
2.25(s,3H,Me-2
6.75;
have
1710,
2xMe esters).
Me ester),
gen
1725,
4R-acetyl-2-methyl-4H-4aa,5,6,7aa-tetrahydrofuro[2,3-blfuran-3,4a-
lH,J=8.5
eter
(neat):
2.18(s,3H,Me-2),
cm-';- NMR 6: 5.53(d,lH,J=7.3,H7a),
Me-4),
IR
3.7-4.3(m,6H,2xCH2,H5+H5'),
2.0-2.3(m,2H,H4tH4'),
dicarboxylate,
tion
5895
a = 23.53(3),. b = 9.61(l),
A3, Qc
chromated 1148
= 1.349
Mo-Ka, Unique
intensities
were
reflections
with
A=
g.cms3,
0.71069
1330(I)
Z = 8, F(000)
A), p(Mo-Ka)
reflections corrected
c = 12.07(2)
in for
were
the
used
= 1136
and
5'629<50'
Space were
polarization
for structure
106.15(10)',
q
(20-C,
= 0.62 cm-'.
range
Lorentz
A, R
solution
graphite group
mono-
C2/c.
collected.
effects.
V=
The
and refinement
The 694
A.M.Ca.uetal.
5896
Table1
Ebnd
Figure
. Bond lengths(A)
Bond
0(1)-C(2)
1.36t2)
C(4Mx.5)
1.50(2)
O(l)-C(7a)
1.48(2)
C(5)-O(6)
1.48(2)
C(Z)-c(3)
1.36(2)
O(6)-C(6a)
1.43(2)
c(2b-W)
1.48(2)
C(6a)-0(7)
1.45(2)
C(3bC(34
1.56(2)
O(7)-Ct7a)
1.40(2)
C(3)-C(9)
1.40(2)
C(7a)-C(l5)
1.50(2)
C(3a)-C(3b)
1.51(z)
C(9)-C(lO)
1.52(3)
C(3a)-C(7a)
1.56(2)
C(9)-O(11)
1.22(2)
C(3aHXl2)
1.47(Z)
C(l2)-C(l3)
1.55(3)
C(3b)-C(4)
1.56(2)
C( 13)-0(
C(3b)-C(6a)
1.50(2)
1. ORTEP plot
of compound
7a.
14)
Figure
1.19t2)
2. ORTEP plot
of compound
Sc.
Synthesis of furo-furans
5S97
Table 2. Bond angles(deg)
116(l)
108(l)
114(l)
108(l)
113(l)
108(l)
132(l)
108(l)
108(l)
111(l)
132(l)
106(l)
119(l)
106(l)
115(l)
121(l)
98(l)
108(l)
117(l)
107(l)
110(l)
109(l)
10411)
120(l)
110(l)
121(2)
118(l)
119(l)
106(l)
121(l)
103(l)
122(l)
106(l)
116(l)
101(l)
and were solved
corrected
by direct
hydrogen were
atoms.
introduced
groups
were
bon atoms used
once
methods 9 . Successive All
atoms,
atoms.
of the residual
refined. Final
electron
solved 8 . The structure
had been Fourier
synthesis
except
positions;
in the Fourier
isotropically
for all oxygen
tuation
hydrogen
in calculated
located
were
the structure
those hydrogen
difference
map;
Anisotropic
R = 0.096, density
of
was
revealed the
atoms
acetyl
groups,
of
acetyl
the
all hydrogen
temperature
Rw = 0.074. 0.31 eAm3.
The
was
all non-
and
car-
factors
were
maximum
fluc-
A.M.CEuretal.
Compound
5c
C16H2207
mw 326.34
Triclinic,
a = 8.06(l),
75.99(8),
7 = 83.19(8)',
= 348
(20-C,
Cm -1.
Space 2495
grafite group
Unique
b = 10.31(2), V = 818(2)
monochroeated
were
corrected
reflections
with
I&30(1)
solved
corrected
atoms.
and not
refined.
gen
atoms.
residual
gc = 1.325
Mo-Ka,
in
the
a = 70.65(7),
gcmW3,
a = 0.71069
range
for Lorents
A),
6 =
2 = 2, F(000)
p(Mo-Ka)
were
used
for
once the structure
All hydrogen
Final
electron
Anisotropic R
= 0.096,
density
atoms
structure
= 0.64
Fourier
were
= 0.070.
factors The
solution
synthesis
introduced
were
maximum
used
Bond
0(1)-C(2)
1.34(l)
C(6)-O(7)
1.47(l)
O(l)-C(7a)
1.51(l)
0(7bC(7a)
1.38(l)
C(2bCt3)
1.30(l)
C(9bO(lO)
1.24(l)
C(2)-C(8)
1.52(l)
C(9)-O(ll)
1.35(l)
C(3bCf4)
1.56(l)
O(llbC(12)
1.43(l)
C(3)-C(9)
1.45(l)
C(l2bCtl3)
1.46(l)
C(4)-C(4a)
1.54(l)
C(14bO(lS)
1.20(l)
C(4)-C(14)
1.53(l)
C(l4bC(l6)
1.54(l)
C(4)-C(l7)
1.51(l)
C(l7)-Of181
1.19(l)
C(4abC(5)
1.53(l)
C(17)-O(l9)
1.32(l)
C(4a)-C(7a)
1.50(l)
0(19bC(20)
1.47(l)
C(SbC(6)
1.51(l)
C(20)-C(21)
1.47(l)
1495
was
all nonpositions
for non-hydro-
fluctuation
Wh
The
refinement
structure
in calculated
was 0.48 effm3.
Lene;th
and
The
revealed
Table 3 . Bond lengths(A)
Bond
collected.
effects.
solved 8 . The
had been
temperature Rw
5',<26,(50' were
and polarization
methods 9 . Successive
by direct
hydrogen
h3,
A,
Pl. reflections
intensities
and were
c = 10.77(2)
of
the
5899
Synthesisof furo-furans
Table 4.
Bond andes(deg)
Angle(d-4
hzle(deg)
118.6( 7)
106.0(7)
105.4(7)
109.3(7)
127.0(8)
104.5(6)
127.6(8)
107.8(8)
122.5(8)
128.3(9)
121.6(7)
112.8(7)
115.6(7)
118.9(8)
107.6(6)
120.3(7)
108.2(6)
110.3(7)
107.9(6)
124.0(8)
106.5(6)
117.3(7)
108.4(7)
118.6(8)
117.9(7)
123.7(g)
116.3(7)
112.8(8)
115.8(7)
123.4(9)
101.9(7)
115.1(7)
102.4(7)
106.7(7)
108.7(7)
~11
ca!culations
Personal
System
2/80
were with
analytical
approximation
dispersion
corrections
were produced
performed SHELX-76 for
the
for all
by the program
on set
atomic
the atoms
ORTEPl'.
an
IBM
of
personal
programs
scattering from
computer
10 ,
factors
which and
model uses
the
anomalous
ref. 11. The molecular
plots
A. M. CELLIet al.
Acknowledgment This Chimica
research
Fine
was
funded
by
the
e Secondaria
(Italy).
G.; Donati,
D,; Cini,
National
Research
Council,
Progetto
References
1.
Adembri, 1980,
2.
Celli,
A.M.;
Lampariello,
Can. J.Chem.,
1982,
3.
Wilfiams,P.D.;
4.
Adembri,
5,
1983, W.
Noggfe,
8.
Walker,
9,
Burls,
Press:
M.
Can.J.Chem.,
New
Maier,
G.M.
Reactions
Scotton,
M.
46, 4143. A.M.;
in Organic
Lett.,
C.K.
The nuclear
SHELX
Tables
dcta
M.;
Scotton,
Synthesis;
1985,
M. Gazz.
Pergamon
86, 2065 and
Overhauser
Crystallogr.,
Calcarano,
D, J.Appl.Cryst., 76, Program
of Cambridge,
U.K.,
Tennessee,
R.E.
D.D.
Camalli,
International migham,
R.;
effect;
Academic
1971.
R.; Viterbo,
12. Johnson,
1981,
A.; Celli,
M. Tetrahedron
Shirner,
York.
M.C.;
University
Nesi,
113, 489.
N.; Stuart,
Spagna,
S.;
therein.
J.H.;
10. Sheldrick,
11.
Scotton,
1990.
R.R.;
references
Chimichi,
C.; Camparini,
Cycloaddition
Oxford.
Schmidt,
L,R+;
E. J.Org.Chem.,
G.; AnseImi,
Carruthers,
7.
R.;
60, 1327.
LeGoff,
Chim.Ital.,
Press: 6.
R,; Nesi,
58, 1645.
Sect.A,
1983,
G.; Giacovazzo, 1989,
C.;
67, Polidori,
2605. G.;
22, 389.
for Crystal
Structure
Determination,
1976.
for
K-Ray
Crystallvgrayhy;
Kynoch
Press:
Bir-
1874; ~01.4. ORTEP,
USA.
1971.
Report
ORAL
3791, Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory,